ae “THE ROOTS OF RITUAL,
very good. 1c seems as though, almost without knowing
then, we have lon the way. Thomas O'Dea has recently
likened our situation to one depicted earlier by Dante, in
the opening lines ofthe Tnerno:
In the middle of te journey of our le
Tame to my senses in dark forest,
for Thad kn the aight path
Dante atleast knew where home was, even if e fle lost
For him God and Paradise were sure. We do not even
know where home is: for us there i literally no diection
home, ‘We have an immense nowalgia and longing for
Thome, for being at home, yet our cule
acute, radical homelesnes,
Most Americans have never been at home io this lad,
‘This is not only because most of us are immigrants or the
descendants of immigrants who have generation after gen
‘ration continued to wander over the face of this éom-
tinent, but aso because most of the founding fathers be
ved in some version of that religous tradition of which
Dante was an earlier voice. For them this earth wat only
1 temporary abude. They were to be in but not of the
world. Their true home was their Father's house, and
theit Father was in heaven. ‘This earth was simply the
Jocation of the long upward climb, the “Pilgtim’s Prog
es.” which was to end gloriously in heaven. Gradually,
‘over the course of several centuries, that upward course
thas become truncated, The heavenly home in which i
‘ends is a split level in suburbia supplied with all the
Tatest electrical equipment. In this transition, hope has
Ihccome gradually overpowered by fear. One cannot really
‘heat home in a house if one feels physically and morally
inure about onics ponewion of Hit one Deeds to pur
‘hase gums to defend it. As Max Weber pointed out
nearly Seventy years ago, the lle lived in obedience to
the heavenly father when the heavenly father has dit
Foam Fe sem Ct ny 1.
inyth of the sky home and
the: deepening. dsllusionment with the. pseu home
Called sucess which gradually took i place that more
than anything has precipitated our rest csi. Seculat
‘als fine nurtured bythe myth of the sky home have
‘weenched themelves lome and have set ou wxcety om 4
Course of uncontrolled acclraton. Wealth and power
when they become ends in themscley, lea inevitably 10
the destruction ofthe natural ensitonmien, eer weaker
Societies, the ls privileged eihin our own society. an
finally and inexorably to the destruction of those mt
fervently and succesflly dedicate to them, As this has
Iecome increasingly clear. there has cacured & manive
revulsion agninat these dominant secular ales, 4 con
alive reaction to the attack by doe mont commited
{o them, and so the cllapse ofthat gest conse Which
has for Tong, though never totally ay the apg have
claimed, characterized Americans.
‘Throughout human history, during those troubled
times when. the common value were collapsing. there
frould arse a nostalgia fora forme. better time In the
Tite twentieth century wesc hat od tendency i a ome-
‘what new form, Teas een common for dhe hostalgia to
te directed toward an eater phase of the same sxiety,
oF t's purely mythical golden age. What is ew b the
fonsderabie historical and anthropological resoutees be
Sng utilized in the current nostalgic fantsicn What we
See is nothing lew than palelihi eval, and its hero
is the one group of people who ever Feally felt at home
jn Amerie, the American Indian
“The young Americans who have made what Thomas
TTR Wel, The Pretunt ihe andthe Spat of
‘eb Tle Peso York Sime 1980.
ce Se ad ali wl°Dea calls “the great refusal," that i the refusal o en
ter the iton cage, have developed a new earth mysticism.
They wane to live with great simplicity and directness, ab
the Indians did. in an earth home or, im Gary Snyders
words, an Barth Howe Hold. Phylis Beauvais in her
poem "Furniture has beautifully captured the contrast
Ferween the old and new visions
there are younger Bow
younger than Ir moving 4 nomads
vou the make camping ground
‘eho do not hope or what a,
expected the catalog comforts
toe once
nor do they imagine
‘hangelean that what they encounter
whose parents
In the Suburbs, inthe small
imidvesera tov
have et down Heavy houses on the land
fn filled them
‘vith a weght of furnishings, and in a manner
ld them down
‘but not their chikren: who dreamed of Indians
tracing
Ad move Tigh om city
exchanging
‘Hornmentis themselves the ay
Shelter they have found?
Unlike these young people, most of the American In-
dans were not nomadic. ‘Fhey found long ago what our
Youth are sll seking. They were at home in their land,
In the cosmos, in their bodies, Among the Pueblo Indians,
Sear Ser, Hark Howe Mold itasphins New Dic
ven,
Pyle Rowe, “ure” New Ye, e316
LLETURGY AND EXPERIENCE
the kiva the underground ceremonial chamber built into
for near every pichlo, wat sll micracou of the wk
were. The iva. according to Frank Waters, "reepiulates
structural form” the "lour'world universe" of Pueblo
mythology:
1 the fori 3 smal ol, the spp, tending down
toto the fant ender, The foot tel fo he coed
world imo wbich sn emerged. The rated veating ge
seprees te thiol wert hd ac Inder rot 30
{he fest opening Un Gerth work to ch oem fn
eter
the kva, man is cver remind that he Hives inthe
whole of the inumense and mad univer. And he i
ny made amare of the phi nivel a
‘mont tet eS Bien
For the Navaho, who have no ivas, the hogan or ordinary
dwelling has the same symbolic meaning as the Pueblo
iva, This is indced being at home in the world.
Tn contrast to the traditional American heroic image
of the Indian as solitary, self reliant, and indi
the new image is more anthropologially informed, if
lin part romantic. Tis the Indian in organic harmony
‘with himself his communal society, and his natural
environment, Not only the Indians But all the remnants
‘of primitive and archaic culture, and theie survival in
the form of heresies and sects in the great civilizations,
ate celebrated in the new culture. Gary Snyder speaks of
a surfacing (na specifically ‘American’ incarnation) of
the Great Subculture which goes back as far pethaps as
the late Paleolithic.» He ses this Great Subculture sur
viving in such forms as shamanism, witchcraft, Taoist,
‘Tantrism, Sufism, and Gnosticism. Unlike the religions
of the sky father, this wadition celebrates Nature a8 a
‘mother. The sky religions emphasize the paternal, hier
(ve York" Rallanine ook, 1970) pW. e
[Yale Russian and East European Publications 13] Ivo Banac, Katherine Verdery - National Character and National Ideology in Interwar Eastern Europe (1995, Yale Center for International and Area Studies)