Professional Documents
Culture Documents
In
Fulfillment of
Requirements in Research II
Group I
X - Pascal
Arizapa, Kenneth
Espinosa, Neil Florenz
Oxales, Alexander Joseph
Rubia, Paul
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION I REGION IV – A CALABARZON I CITY SCHOOLS DIVISION OF DASMARIÑAS
Table of Contents
Approval Sheet………………………………………………………i
Acknowledgement………………………………………………….ii
Abstract……………………………………………………………...iii
I. Introduction......................................................................1
C. Null Hypotheses.................................................................3
D. Assumptions.......................................................................3
G. Definition of Terms.............................................................5
III. Methodology...................................................................17
C. Procedure.........................................................................18
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION I REGION IV – A CALABARZON I CITY SCHOOLS DIVISION OF DASMARIÑAS
D. Research
Design..............................................................................23
A. Problem 1.........................................................................27
B. Problem 2.........................................................................33
C. Problem 3.........................................................................36
Recommendations.........................................................37
A. Summary of Findings.......................................................37
B. Conclusion.......................................................................38
C. Recommendation.............................................................39
VI. References......................................................................40
VII. Appendices.....................................................................43
A. Questionnaires Used........................................................43
ABSTRACT
subject areas.
using Clip Studio, Photoshop, and Aseprite, and Audio using FL Studio. Three
game, Second group played shooter game, and Third group played nothing.
they are suggested to answer math questions only as much as they want. They
played the game for ten (10) days. The researchers provided no intervention
while the students play the game. The players evaluated the game based on
items answered.
immersion value. The results show that the hyper-casual game have an
confidence rating of the grand mean 3.17, considered to be “neutral”, and the
shooter game have an evaluation rating of the grand mean 4.27, considered to
“good”. For the immersion value, the f-ratio of 127.83 shows that there is a
answered by the hyper-casual, shooter, and controlled group. Lastly, the two
games are compared into one another based on the entertainment and
confidence rating. The results gained no significant difference between the two.