You are on page 1of 4

0.

15pm CMOS with High Reliability and Performance


K.Takeuchi, T.Yamamoto, A.Tanabe, T.Matsuki, T.Kunio, M.Fukuma,
*K.Nakajima, 'H.Aizaki, *H.Miyamoto and 'E.Ikawa
Microelectronics Research Labs. and *ULSI Device Development Labs., NEC Corporation
1120. Shimokuzawa, Sagamihara-shi, Kanagawa 229, JAPAN

Abstract current is obtained.


0 . 1 5 ~CMOSFETs with high reliability and Hot Carrier Lifetime for nMOS
performance have been realized. The acceptable power
supply voltage V, was estimated to be 1.9V. A To determine the allowable V , the hot carrier
reasonably short ring oscillator delay of 33ps was obtained reliability for both nMOS and PMOS was examined. Fig3
for the 1.9V V, maintaining an 0.4V threshold voltage. shows shift in the drain current AI& (linear region), and
Anomalous surface state generation and Vm shift for the shift in the charge pumping current &, as a function of
PMOS were observed, though the degradation was less stress gate voltage V,, for the nMOS (gate length
severe than the nMOS. LQ=0.18pm, effective channel length I-=O.l6pn). The
surface state generation (AIcp) shows a well-known 'bell'
Introduction shape, and the peak coincides with the maximum in
substrate current ,I vs V, curve, as usual. However, the
Recently, MOSFET miniaturization down to 0 . 1 p corresponding peak in the AIJ, vs V, curve is not
gate length and below is explored. One of the key issues distinct. This suggests that enhanced electron trapping
for achieving high performance with such small devices occurs at high V,, causing an ID degradation comparable
is the choice of power supply voltage V, and hence, hot to that in the maximum 1- condition. The enhanced
camer reliability. It is particularly important for room trapping may have occurred due to some process-related
temperature operation, since Vm is difficult to be scaled problem. Since the worst case stress condition is not clear,
down due to the stand-by current requirements, while the lifetime extrapolation for both maximum I, and V,=VD
delay is roughly proportional to VJ(V,-V,3. conditions were performed (ng. 4). The extrapolated
In this paper, hot carrier reliability and performance lifetime (defined by Ag,,,/g,=lOQ, where g, is the
of 0 . 1 5 ~CMOSFETs are presented. transconductance in the linear region) is shorter for the
maximum I, condition. The acceptable V, to guarantee
Device Fabrication 10 year dc lifetime was estimated to be 1.9V.
Fig.1 shows a schematic cross section of the 0 . 1 5 ~ Hot Carrier Lifetime for PMOS
CMOS. The gate oxide thickness is 5nm. Gate electrodes
were drawn by electron beam lithography. The n+ and p+ Fig.5 shows shift in the threshold voltage AVm, and
gates were doped simultaneously with the source/drain shift in the charge pumping current &,as a function of
formation. The source/drain consists of a shallow stress gate voltage V,, for the PMOS (LQ=0.18pm,
extension [l] and a deeper contact region. The junction L8pp--O.l3pm). Usually, electron trapping dominates in
depth and gate-todrain overlap of the source/drain PMOS degradation, causing a sharp positive peak in a
extensions were suppressed by depositing a thin SiO, AVm vs V, plot at low IV,I. However, in the present
blanket before their implantation. The activation was done case, significant surface state generation (&), and large
by RTA. TiSi, salicidation was used to reduce both the negative AVm, presumably caused by the surface state,
gate poly and the source/drain resistances. All the pattem are observed. Similar AIm vs V, results, but without
layers except for the gate were formed by i-line significant AVm, is found in the literature [2].
lithography, using 0 . 6 ~design rules. Therefore, to The peculiar AIm vs V, curve seems to reflect the rate
reduce the junction capacitance, the channel impurity for of hole injection into the gate oxide; The peak around
punchthrough stop was implanted only around the gate vQ=-2v should correspond to the m a x i " of hot hole
electrode (within 0 . 3 ~of the nominal gate edge), generation, and the monotonic increase for V,<-4V be
covering most of the source/drain regions with a caused by the increase in hole-attractive field near the
photoresist. Fig.2 shows typical I-V curves for a poly gate drain. One reason for the enhanced surface state
length L,=0.15~. Good tum-off and reasonably large generation may be the more hole-attractive vertical field

36.2.1
0-7803-1450-6 $3.00 0 1993 IEEE IEDM 93-883
in surface channel pMOSFETs, compared with buried (AR/R=AgJgJ for the same absolute degradation AR.
channel ones. Electron trapping also occurs, as indicated Fig.10 shows ISJD as a function of VD-VmAT for long
by the slight positive AVm at lower lVol stress. However, and short devices, where VmATis the potential of the
it seems to be less significant in determining the device pinch-off point. V, can be determined from the
lifetime. I d D data itself, as was first pointed out in [5]. TO
The results of PMOS lifetime extrapolation m obtain more well-defined results, particularly for short
shown in Fig.6. Bias conditions similar to the nMOS case channel devices, VmAT was extracted from Isv$ID VS VD
(Vo=VJ2 and V,=V,J were chosen. The lifetime was curves, instead of I, vs V, ones. The horizontal shift of
defined by AVm=20mV, since AVm was severer than Agm. a curve from the one for Vo=Vm was taken as equal to
The estimated allowable V, (2.5V) is much larger than VNAT, assuming V , a for V,=V,. Here, V, for
that for the nMOS. vD=O.lv was used. Following this VmAT determination
procedure, I d D VS VD-VNAT curves almost
Switching speed independent from LBpp.
Thus, if the voltage applied to the pinch-off region
Applying the 1.9V supply voltage, a reasonably short (=VD-VNAT) is fixed, the electron energy distributions near
ring oscillator delay zpdof 33ps (Fig.7) was obtained for the drain is considered to be independent from the
FO=1, &=0.15pm, while suppressing the standby-current channel length even down to 0 . 1 ~ No . singular I-
to about lOpA/pm (IVmI=0.4V). dependence is detected. However, the results do not mean
According to SPICE simulations, junction capacitance the absence of non-stationary carrier transport. Rather, it
C,, overlap capacitance Cov, and source/drain resistance is believed to have occurred, but equally in all the
RSD are the key parasitic factors that determine the samples, resulting in the failure of its detection. To
inverter delay. By means of the area-restricted channel experimentally catch it, samples with different pinch-off
implant technique. C, is adjusted to be equivalent to region length must be compared.
0 . 1 5 design,
~ while using 0 . 6 design
~ rules. Further
reduction of C, is possible by cutting down the alignment Conclusion
tolerance ( 0 . 3 ~ ) Though
. Cov is controlled by the SiO,
blanket, there still remains room for suppressing the Hot carrier reliability of 0 . 1 5 nMOS
~ and PMOS
PMOS overlap ( L 0 - u 0 . 0 6 p ) . By reducing both C, and was evaluated. The allowable V, was as high as 1.9V.
CO,, 2, about 2Ops should be possible. Parasitic The degradation of PMOS, though much different from
resistance becomes a serious problem. In spite of the TiSi, conventional devices, was less severe than nMOS.
salicidation, high source/drain doping, and large contact Applying the 1.9V, a ring oscillator delay T,, of 33ps
holes, RsD caused, through the reduction of the drive was obtained, maintaining sufficiently high V,. The
current, more than 10%increase in zpp The effect of gate results demonstrate that 0 . 1 5 CMOS
~ with both high
sheet resistance was not serious in this work, since the speed and reliability is feasible.
channel width used was small (W4p.m. W p 8 p ) . No singular channel length dependence was found,
either in hot carrier degradation or impact ionization,
Closer look at nMOS hot carrier effects down to 0 . 1 ~ To . experimentally detect non-stationary
carrier transport, the length of pinch-off region, rather
In Fig.8, the allowable V, is compared with that for than channel length, should be varied as a parameter.
0 . 4 generation
~ devices. The 1.9V V, for the 0 . 1 5 ~
devices is much higher than expected from the constant Acknowledgement
field scaling ( V e L , ) , and even higher than the square-
root scaling level (V,=LovL) [3]. This can be a result of The authors would like to thank N.Ehdo for his
non-stationary carrier transport, which is expected to occur continuous encouragement, and I.Sakai, H.Abiko,
when the channel length approaches 0 . 1 ~ Therefore,
. T.Horiuchi for their useful suggestions.
channel length dependence of nMOS hot carrier effects
have been examined. References
Fig.9 shows 'charge to lifetime' (TI,,) vs impact
ionization rate ( I d , , ) plots [4] for various effective [l] G.A.Sai-Halasz et al., in 1987 IEDM Tech. Dig., p.397.
channel lengths LBpp. The lifetime z is defined by either [2] F.Matsuoka et al., IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, ED-
(A) relative shift in transconductance (Ag,,,/gm=lO%),or 37, 1487 (1990).
(B) absolute shift in source-to-drain linear resistance 131 M.Kakumu et al., EEE Trans. Electron Devices, ED-
(AR=300sZm). For a given I d , , the absolute degradation 37, 1334 (1990).
in R is independent from & down to 0 . 1 ~ The . & [4] C.Hu et al., IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, ED-32, 375
dependence of z in the case of (A) is merely due to the (1985).
difference in the initial R. A shorter device has smaller R, [5] T.Y.Chan et al., IEEE Electron Devices Letters, EDL-
and hence suffers from a larger relative degradation 5, 505 (1984).

36.2.2
884-IEDM 93

-
-m
!3D extension lisp
/ A lpMos1
Schematic MOSFET cross section.

fp)qEm
I \ I
/ P- i
punchthrough t of5nm
stopper

E- -04

8 4
-1

-1Z -2
VDM Vo M Vo M Vc M
(a) nMOS (b) PMOS

Fig2 EV curves of n and pMOSFETs. L.&.lSp.


L A . 1 3 p m for nMOS and 0 . 1 0 for
~ PMOS. respecuvely.

Fig3 Shift in linear drain current I,, and charge pumping Fg.4 Lifetime extrapolation for nMOSFET. The lifetime is
current Icp vs stress gate voltage V,. for nMOSFET defined by Ag./&=lO%, where & is the maximum
(LgpP--.16~). transconductance in the linear region.

-1 60 0.5
stress @VD-5V, 310s

VG (v) 1 /VD or')


Fig.5 Shift in threshold voltage V, and charge pumping Fig.6 Lifetime extrapolation for pMOSFET. The lietime is
current I, vs stress gate voltage Vo. for pMOSFET d e f d by AV+2OmV. AVm is much more severe than
W . 1 3 ~ ) . ND.

36.2.3 IEDM 93-885


/-
. ’ 0:r
lk. 1
I
Fig.7 Output waveform of a 101 stage ring oscillator with GATE LENGTH ( p m)
F-1, L , # . 1 5 ~ . W , 4 w W,=8~lm, IVm14.4V and
V e 1 . 9 V . The delay ~ ~ - 3 3 ~ s .
Figs Canparison of allowable , V between 0.15 and
0.4- generations. Junction depth, gate oxide thickness,
substrate concentration are different between the generations.
SD is for single drain.

Fig.10 Is& VS V,-V, for various V,’S and two


different G s . Though slight horizontal shift (SOmV)
between W . 1 0 and 1 . 0 is~ observed, the shape of the
curves are almost identical.

105 10-2 lo-’ 1 00


ISUB/ID

Fig.9 ‘51, VS IsvJrDfor IMOSFETSwith various where


‘c is for (A) AgJg-=lO% and (B) AR=30OS&m. R is the
source-to-drainresistance at V,=2V in the linear region.

36.2.4
886-IEDM 93

In --
1

You might also like