The target in this study are the respondents IP (Indigenous People) or subanen

Statistical Treatment [for quantitative studies]

[Describe the types of data gathered and how these will be treated statistically.

Identify the tests to be conducted. (e.g. t-test, ANOVA or analysis of variance for testing

significant differences or multiple regression or Pearson”r” for testing significant

relationship.)

 No formula

Data Analysis [for qualitative studies]

[Describe what types of data are gathered and how these will be analysed].

Ethical Considerations in Research

[Describe how ethics in research will be ensured. Enumerate the considerations

and what measures are applied to ensure the observance of ethics].

 Consult research books

 How the study observe ethics


 Chapter 4

Presentation, Analysis and Interpretation of Data

This chapter presents, analyzes and interprets the data on Variable 1, Variable 2

and Variable 3. The components of Variable 1 are: component 1, component 2 and

component 3. The indicators for volume 2 are Indicator 1, indicator 2 and indicator 3.

Variable 3 consists of indicator a, indicator b, and indicator c.

Variable 1

This study includes the following indicators of variable 1: indicator 1, indicator 2

and indicator 3. Tables 2 to 5 present the data on Variable 1.

[Present first the overall weighted mean. Second, the item with highest weighted

mean. Third, the item with lowest weighted mean.]

Indicator 1. Table 2 presents the data on indicator 1. As shown, the overall

weighted mean of indicator 1 is 3.5, interpreted as Very Good. The table also presents

that Item No. 4 etcetcetc got the highest weighted mean of 3.8, interpreted as very good.

Item No. 1 The teacher is etcetcetcposted the lowest weighted mean of 2.6, interpreted

as Good.

(Interpret the data (why are they so? Why highest, why lowest)

(Support with literature.Highlight how your data are similar or different from the

findings of related literature. Why is it so?)

ex. The results indicated that etc. etc. etc. The results find support from Agustero

(2013), etc. etc etc. However, Lim (2013: p.12) argued that “etc., etc., etc.,etc”.
 3

Table 1Indicator 1

Items Weighted Interpretation

Mean

1 The teachers is etcetcetc 2.60 Skilled

2 3.25 Skilled

3 3.27 Highly Skilled

4 3.80 Highly Skilled

5 1.78 Not Skilled

Overall Mean Response 2.94 Skilled

Hypothetical Mean Range: 1.00-1.75 Highly Not Skilled

1.76 – 2.5 Not Skilled

2.51 – 3.25 Skilled

3.26 – 4.00 Highly Skilled

[The interpretation of the hypothetical mean must align with the question asked in the

statement of the problem. e.g. Q1 level of skills hence interpreted as highly skilled,

skilled, not skilled, highly not skilled].

Indicator 2. The data on Indicator 2 are presented in Table 3. As shown, the

overall weighted mean of Indicator 2 is 3.26, interpreted Very Good. The table also

presents that Item No. 4 etcetcetc got the highest weighted mean of 3.8, interpreted as

very good. Item No. 3 The teacher is etcetcetcposted the lowest weighted mean of 2.5,

interpreted as Fair.

(Present first the overall weighted mean. Second, the item with highest weighted

mean. Third, the item with lowest weighted mean.)

(Interpret the data (why are they so? Why highest, why lowest)
 4

(Support with literature.Highlight how your data are similar or different from the

findings of related literature. Why is it so?)

ex. According to Agustero (2013), etc. etc etc. Anghad (2013) supported this contention

by saying “etcetc, etcetc”.

Summary Data on Variable 1. Table 5 shows the summary of data on V1

Indicators Overall Interpretation

Weighted

Mean

1 Indicator 1

2 Indicator 2

3 Indicator 3

Overall Mean Response

Hypothetical Mean Range: 1.00-1.75 Highly Not Skilled

1.76 – 2.5 Not Skilled

2.51 – 3.25 Skilled

3.26 – 4.00 Highly Skilled

Variable 2

(Same as variable 1)

Variable 3

(Same as variable 2)

Testing of the Hypotheses

The following hypotheses were tested using the 0.05 level of significance.

There is a significant difference between Group 1 and Group 2 in terms of …..

 5

Action Plan(desired output)

Based on the findings, an action plan was developed to enhance V3 (cf.

Appendix 5). (Discuss the action plan).

 Chapter 5

Summary of Findings, Conclusion/s and Recommendations

[Introductory paragraph stating the contents of the chapter.]

Summary of Findings

Introductory paragraph.

1. (Question 1)

Answer to Question 1

2. (Question 2)

Answer to Question 2

3. And so on

Conclusion/s

(Refer to your general statement of the problem) Make a general statement

relevant to the purpose of your study. Add statements on so what? (ex. Students’

engagement in online games affects their social behaviors and academic-related

behaviors. Then HEIs/Guidance Center should ….[still generic statements]. )

Recommendations

Based on the findings, the researcher endorses the following recommendations:

1. (identify the target group/persons who will implement the recommendation,

then state the specific course of action.) (must jive to the significance).

2. And so on…

3. C

4. C

5. C

6. c
 7

References
 8

Appendix A

[Permission to conduct the study]

 9

Appendix B

(Instrument A)
 10

Appendix C

Instrument B
 11

Curriculum Vitae

[Insert picture in toga]