Professional Documents
Culture Documents
D. JUNIQUE
PROCEDURE FOR
OCTOBER 1996
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I- Introduction p1
4- Interpretations of results p 15
1- Material levels p 15
2- Particle-size evolution within the mill p 16
3- Liners p 19
4- Diaphragms p 21
5- Grinding charges p 25
6- Retention time p 27
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
V- Separation balance p 29
1- Objectives p 29
4- Rosin-Rammler slope p 35
5- Separator Inspection p 36
1- Static separator p 36
2- 1st or 2nd generation separator or both p 37
3- 3rd generation separator p 40
6- Interpretations of results p 41
1- Mesh selection p 41
2- Sampling locations for the distribution curve p 41
3- Average values of the distribution curve p 45
4- 3rd generation separator p 45
1- Objectives p 46
2- Calculation principle p 46
5- Numerical example p 50
6- Interpretations of results p 52
1- Static separator p 52
2- Sample representativity p 52
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
VII- Air flow balance p 54
1- Objectives p 54
4- Interpretations of results p 60
1- Anemometric measurements p 60
2- Pitot tube, Strauscheib measurements p 60
3- Gas analysis p 63
4- Calculation of air inleakage from gas analysis p 64
5- Mill ventilation ratios p 66
1- Objectives p 67
3- Interpretations of results p 70
1- Drying balance p 70
2- Heat balance p 71
1- Objectives p 72
2- Energy balance p 72
3- Interpretations of results p 74
1- Energy balance p 74
2- BB10 Test p 74
X- Conclusions p 75
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
1
I - INTRODUCTION
This document is intended for the diagnosis and analysis of problems with ball mill circuits, in order to
bring about the required modifications for a suitable operation.
clinker grinding
raw mix grinding
fuel grinding
All grinding mills are designed to reduce the size of the material at the lowest possible cost and for the last 2
types of mills, to dry the material.
For a given mill with 1, 2 or 3 compartments or birotator, the types of analysis are similar.
A roller press or crusher may be installed ahead of the grinding mill. In that case they perform somewhat like a
grinding mill fist compartment (they would be treated as such).
The following balances will be fully covered: sampling and internal mill observations
separation (dynamic separator distribution curve)
material
air flow
energy
drying (raw mix and fuel)
The calculation formulae will be developed as well as the computer programs for the calculations.
Important:
Measuring devices and various collectors (power, material and air flows, temperature) must be reliable
and calibrated.
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
2
A file should be completed for each finishing mill, updated after each modification and containing the
following process parameters:
☞ Process balances even if sketchy (air flow, material, internal mill investigation, etc.)
☞ Operating data for each product (equipment adjustments, various power draws, air flows,
☞ Source and type of drying gases (essentially raw or fuel mills), type and volume of fuel (in the case
of an auxiliary furnace)
This list is not complete and any parameter modifications that could improve the understanding of the finishing
mill operation can and should be recorded.
This follow-up gives an idea of the evolution of the finishing mill performances.
The audit, involving the techniques presented in this document, consists of a series of prompt measures that
provides a more precise insight of the grinding mill operation at a given time.
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
3
The Table hereunder reviews the principal causes of a finishing mill operation problems, the effects
produced and the analyses that should be undertaken to highlight and quantify the problems.
No matter the type of operating problem, it generally produces a drop in output causing an increase in energy
consumption per tonne of finished product. The drop in output is not necessarily outstanding, often it is a time-
dependent drift. Hence it is important to keep an operating record for each product in the finishing mill.
Certain particular signs will sometimes allow quick spotting of the source of the problem (see 2nd column in the
above Table).
In this case, the analyses indicated in the column should be undertaken as a priority. When the cause of the
operating problem is not clear, a complete audit should be done.
Note: If time and means are not available, the two priority actions to take are :
- Internal inspection and material sampling
- Distribution curve of the dynamic separator
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
4
The grinding mill is the machine that reduces the size of the materials. The role of the separator is to
classify the grains according to their size.
The grinding mill plays therefore a key function in the finishing mill.
The internal mill inspection is an important step in the audit. It should provide a qualitative evaluation of the mill
operation.
The reduction of the particle size of the material which is dependent upon the conditions of the mill parts must
be qualified.
An internal inspection must be made during a crash stop of an installation (all equipment, ventilation and
material feeds having completely stopped) so as to reflect the condition of the mill in operation.
It is strongly recommended to take pictures of the overall compartment and also detailed pictures of all the
essential items covered by the internal audit (liners, diaphragms, charge, etc.).
For each mill, “typical shots” can be systematically taken at the same locations each year.
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
5
IV - 2 - 1 - Material Levels
- Compartment 1, generally short and equipped with lifting liners, the material level with respect to the balls is
homogeneous and therefore a simple average value is sufficient for characterization
- Compartment 2, generally long and equipped with classifying liners, three evaluations must be made (inlet,
center and outlet)
☞ Check if there is an accumulation of unground grains at the outlet grate of the compartment and try to
IV - 2 - 2 - Material Sampling
☞ Sample material in order to characterize the evolution of the particle-size distribution over the length of
each compartment.
Sampling shall be made near the beginning and end of the compartment (a few cm from the diaphragms)
The other locations should be at equal distance one another with about a 50 cm spacing in compartment 1 and
0.75 to 1 m maximum in compartment 2 (modulation as a function of the compartment length to obtain a minimum
of 4 to 5 locations per compartment, up to 7 or 8, even more, for a good-size compartment 2).
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
6
Compartment no 1 Compartment no 2
Samples
Charge
Direction of rotation
C1 C2
1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5
- Sampling procedure
At each sampling location, dig, using a sampling scoop, a 10 to 15 cm deep transverse trench, over a half
diameter of the lifting side of the mill, in order to take material from the ball charge (the surface layer might
become polluted by the material deposit following the crash stop).
Take, over the entire length of the trench, between 0.5 and 1 L of material adapted to the material fineness. The
coarser the material the larger the sample (sample representativity).
In compartment 2 where ball size is smaller, it is recommended to use a sieve (10 to 15 mm mesh) to facilitate the
material / ball classification.
Caution: grains, eventually too coarse, retained on the sieve, must be added to the material and not discarded
with the balls.
Following the grading analysis of each sample, a curve should be plotted for each compartment showing the
percentage of retained particles as a function of the compartment length. This analysis makes it possible to see
the evolution of the particle-size distribution of the material in each compartment and adjust the size of the balls.
As a basis:
10 mm
5 mm
Compartment 1 2.5 mm (important)
1 mm
500 µm
5 mm
2.5 mm (important)
1 mm
Compartment 2 500 µm
200 µm
100 µm
63 µm
40 µm
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
7
When the mill is rotating, take as a reference point a door for example, record the time required for the shell to
make a given number of rotations. Calculate the rotating speed (V).
42.3
Vc is obtained using the formula : Vc (rpm) =
useful Ø (m)
With the measured rotating speed (V in revolutions / minute) the percentage of the critical speed can be
determined (required value for the calculations of the mill power). This is the V/Vc ratio or % Vc.
☞ Survey the types of liners (lifting, classifying, etc.) length and number of rows. For classifying liners,
note the number of plates in a given row (see picture p 8).
☞ Measure the steps (difference in height between 2 consecutive plates in a given row).
Make several measurements, identify the maximum and minimum step and estimate an average value.
Step
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
8
Step
Classifying liners: 1 inclined plate Classifying liners: 1 flat plate + 1 inclined plate
☞ Note the possible presence of material coatings on the liners (hard material should be distinguished
from dust that might have settled during the crash stop).
- a - Inlet head
☞ Measure the diameter (beginning and end) of the mill shell inlet and its length.
☞ Note the possible presence of turns and their length, promoting the feed of material.
Turn height
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
9
- b - Outlet head
☞ Measure the diameter of the ventilation ring and estimate its permeability
% of free surface
Permeability =
Total ring surface
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
10
- c - Diaphragms
☞ Type of diaphragm (simple, double, double adjustable) and supplier (Slegten, Pfeiffer, Polysius, FLS...)
☞ Measure the diameter and assess the permeability of the ventilation ring.
Staggered sectors generate a more or less large spacing that can be assimilated to a slot. If that spacing is large,
coarse grains are likely to enter compartment 2.
Radial slots
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
11
Tangential slots
Circumferential slots
☞ Measure the slots (several measurements including estimated maximum, and average values).
Scrap
Slot width
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
12
Peening is characterized by a partial closing of the slots and with the edges appearing notched.
Scrap and peening restrict the entrance of the material and the slots must be cleaned.
It is normal to see material in the slots (crash stop) but in that case it loosens up.
IV - 3 - 4 - Grinding charges
☞ Measure the length of the free space in 2 or 3 locations along the length of the compartment.
The height is measured on the mill diameter between the center of a step or liner plate and the ball charge.
Length measurements should be averaged in order to determine the filling rate.
It is estimated that the material increases the actual ball filling rate by about 2% in a compartment having a
suitable material rate.
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
13
Vertical
measurement
Middle axis
☞ To complete the free space measurement, measure the distance between the charge and the lower
☞ Estimate, for compartments equipped with classifying liners, the charge classification (very good, right,
poor, reverse) given that the large balls should be at the beginning of the compartment and then, in a regular
decreasing order, the small ones at the end of the compartment.
☞ Measure the diameter of the largest and smallest visible ball (gives an idea of the charge wear
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
14
☞ Note the possible presence of ball coatings. Ball coatings or liner coatings or both may be the cause
of charge declassification.
☞ Note the possible presence of foreign matters as well as their nature in the ball charge. These foreign
matters hinder the charge action and may get stuck in the slots (scrap).
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
15
IV - 4 - Interpretations of results
IV - 4 - 1 - Material levels
- Compartment 1
This level can be controlled to a constant output by means of adjustable scoops (on a double diaphragm only,
opening varying according to the inclination of the scoop) and by adjusting the grading of the grinding charge.
In operation the material level is controlled by means of an electronic listening device placed at about 1/3 of the
compartment length and 15˚ below the horizontal axis (where balls drop).
A charge that is too coarse, hence permeable, will let the material flow too rapidly and the compartment will
become relatively empty of material.
This will create inter ball and ball / liner shocks without grinding results and cause the deterioration of the
equipment.
A charge that is too fine will increase the material rate and when the balls fall back on a bed of material that is too
thick, they loose their grinding efficiency.
Scoop
Increased position
Compartment 2
The material level should be located :
3 to 4 cm above the charge at the beginning of the compartment
at the same level as the charge in the middle of the compartment
3 to 4 cm below the charge at the end of the compartment
The material rate, at constant flow, can be adjusted only by the grading of the charge.
Note: The grinding charge grading should be mainly determined according to the desired fineness of the
finished product and following the analysis of the curves showing the evolution of the particle-size distribution of
the material in each compartment.
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
16
Curves based on samples of material in the mill (for each compartment) should show a decreasing pattern over
the entire length of the compartment.
Case 2 - Compartment 1: There is no more evolution between sample 4 and 5 at the end of the compartment.
Compartment 2: same, no evolution on the last 2 samples
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
17
Case 3 - Compartment 1: Curves are ascending at the end of the compartment, this is typical of an accumulation
of grains in the intermediate diaphragm. If the slots are clean and of proper size, the solution is to raise the
grinding power by increasing the charge grading.
Compartment 2: OK
The grinding charge of compartment 1 should be reviewed.
A good working criterion for compartment 1 charge is to have less than 5% retained on the 2.5 mm mesh
at the beginning of compartment 2 for a cement mill.
Caution: A mill is often used for several products and before changing a charge, the compatibility of the
charge with all the manufactured products (internal samplings and observations) should be insured.
Unfortunately, as seen before, the particle-size evolution curves are distorted by the circulating charge.
The greater the circulating charge, the shorter the material flow time and the flatter the curves.
To do away with the circulating charge, a mathematical treatment procedure is used (based on internal samples)
to plot a RFCS curve (Reduced Fineness Curve Slope).
The RFCS index characterizes a mill for its ability to reduce the size of the material.
In practice, the corresponding calculation sheet is filled (see appendix) with the particle-size distribution analyses
of the samples taken in the mill.
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
18
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
-1.4 -1.2 -1.0 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0.0
LOG x
RFCS for a CEM Type 1 cement at a 45 µm mesh reference, has usual values at Lafarge Ciments ranging
between 11 and 83 with an average standing at 35.
The higher the RFCS the more efficient the grinding charge.
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
19
IV - 4 - 3 - Liners
- Compartment 1
Compartment 1 does the crushing, hence the need to lift the grinding charge with the lifting liners.
From a process standpoint, the step should not be worn out by more than 60% to maintain a lifting function.
In practice the original step usually measures 70 mm. When it wears down to less than 30 mm, assurance should
be given that this will not affect the performance of the mill.
Case 1 - Lifting liners with a suitable step on the front plates and a border line step on the back liners
Case 2 - Lifting liners with completely worn out and heavily scratched steps
On this open-circuit mill, the mere replacement of the C1 liners resulted in a flow rate increase from 20% to 25%.
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
20
- Compartment 2
Compartment 2 works by attrition (grinding produced by the rubbing of balls against the material),
liners being usually of the classifying type.
They may consist of 1 to 3 plates depending on the mill diameter (see pictures p 8).
The last plate of each group of 2 or 3 is inclined (which produces the classifying effect), the preceding ones can
be flat or inclined.
The original step measures about 12 cm, and given the small size of the balls (60 mm max.) in compartment 2,
the evolution is slow.
Wear usually takes place in the form of scratches perpendicular to the compartment axis.
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
21
IV - 4 - 4 - Diaphragm
- a - Simple diaphragm
Possible adjustments involve the permeability of the grinding charge and eventually the partial clogging of the
slots.
- b - Double diaphragm
A front face provided with slots, a rear face provided with blind plates and between the two, lifters which control
the material flow.
A diaphragm similar to a double diaphragm with a system that regulates the amount of material transferred from
C1 to C2. The lifting liners are replaced with scoops allowing, depending on the adjustment, more or less material
to be picked up.
- Slegten: The number of scoops and their positions (opened at x%, closed, not used)
- Polysius: Lifting liner recess
- Pfeiffer: Slide opening
The adjustment can be performed only during a mill stop, which explains that in practice the scoop adjustment is
very seldom modified during product switching.
For a Slegten diaphragm, the optimum scoop adjustment can be determined for each product only through a
series of adjustments of the number of opened scoops and their opening positions (in general, there are 6 to 8
scoop positions).
After each adjustment, the material rate in compartment 1 should be measured. It is a time-consuming and
tedious job but which is important when switching from a straight product to a blended product for example. The
material rate of compartment 1 is one of the indicators of performance.
For the other types of diaphragms, the procedure is similar. The adjustment control designed by the
manufacturer should be used.
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
22
Slot opening width of the outlet diaphragm = opening width of the intermediate diaphragm slots + 2 mm.
The adherence to this rule allows the grains having reached the intermediate diaphragm, but too coarse to be
ground in compartment 2, to move out of the mill without interfering with the operation of compartment 2.
The first one must insure that the grains do not get stuck, the second one facilitate the release of the material
either towards compartment 2 or mill discharge.
Manufacturers provide dimensions of the total slot surface with ratios in the range of:
10 to 20 cm2 per tonne/h of material passing through the diaphragm (= flow of fresh material + rejects)
Slot Diagram
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
23
wear zone
peening
peening
After excessive diaphragm wear, the slot width increases and the C1 side clearance disappears which will cause
the plugging of the slots with grains or scrap.
While waiting for the diaphragms to the replaced, frequent cleaning of the slots are required.
Peening is caused by the impact of the balls on the diaphragm resulting in the closing of the head slots of side 1
clearance; peening is characterized by slots of variable width and notched edges.
Peening may induce in the long term total plugging of the slots.
It is then necessary to clear the slots to allow a suitable flow of material through.
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
24
- e - Ventilation Ring
It must be as large (compatibility with the filling rate of the balls + material) and as permeable as possible to
promote mill ventilation.
However the grate must remain sufficiently rigid to prevent balls from moving from one compartment to another.
This is certainly one of the best types of ventilation ring combining permeability and sturdiness.
Caution: In case of cramming of compartment 1 there is a risk that coarse grains might enter into compartment 2.
To prevent this a grate can be installed on compartment 2 side.
Case 2 - Sturdy grate but less permeable than case 1. It is still acceptable to the extent that the holes with a
diameter larger than 25 mm are sufficiently numerous.
Not recommended in closed-circuit but acceptable in open-circuit where mill ventilation is lower.
Case 4 - Grate with an almost nil permeability. Very few holes of small diameter which will get plugged up with
material. The result is practically no mill ventilation left.
Ventilation rings of this type are stiff found in closed-circuit mills. This belongs more like to the handy-man world
(a few holes drilled on a blind plate) than to process technology.
This type of grate should be banned and replaced with bars with a spacing adapted to the grading of the grinding
charge of compartment 2 (mainly open-circuit where balls can be reduced to a 17 even 15 mm diameter and
liners not necessarily of the classifying type).
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
25
IV - 4 - 5 - Grinding charge
- a - Compartment 1
Filling rate of 30 to 35% which corresponds to a good compromise between flow rate and specify consumption.
In clinker mills, 4 sizes of balls: 90, 80, 70 and 60 mm are typically used:
90 mm 20.0% by mass
80 mm 38.4% by mass
70 mm 25.6% by mass
60 mm 16.0% by mass
Apparent density: about 4.5 t/m3. An average value for a typical charge as described above. This value may
vary ± 0.1 t/m3 depending on the installed charge.
In raw mills the same mass proportions with an almost identical range of balls can be found The raw mix is easier
to grind (decrease in ball range), but the grading at the inlet is coarser (increase in ball range).
The ball sizes and proportions constitute a theoretical base that should be adjusted after an internal inspection
and on the basis of the fineness curves plotted from material sampling data.
If the charge does very little work at the end of the compartment and the 2.5 mm mesh reject < 5%, the charge
will have to be improved. Case 2 page 24. If on the contrary an accumulation of grains is found in the
intermediate diaphragms with 2.5 mm mesh rejects > 5%, the charge will have to be made coarser.
To maintain a good crushing performance an average mass of approximately 1.8 kg per ball should be
maintained.
- b - Compartment 2
Compartment 2 or finishing compartment must produce the fineness and the ball diameters are relatively small (in
a closed circuit) or very small (in an open-circuit since the material must have the required fineness at the mill
discharge).
The theoretical charge is divided into 2 zones: the first of transition (between compartment 1 and compartment 2)
and the second of finishing.
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
26
Transition zone consisting of 50 and 40 mm balls in numbers equal to that of the 60 mm balls of compartment 1.
Number 60 mm = Number 50 mm = Number 40 mm.
Finishing zone made up of balls < 40 mm and with a distribution following slegten equations.
Ø = 3.3 e-0.1x
Where: Ø = ball diameter
x = abscissa in compartment 2 (in meters) with origin at the diaphragm
Knowing for a given diameter the section length and on the basis of the filling rate and apparent density, the ball
mass of the section can be calculated (see the corresponding working sheet in the appendix).
Apparent density: roughly 4.7 t/m3. Average value for a typical charge as described above. This value may vary
±0.12/m3 depending on the installed charge.
The apparent density will be higher if the charge is finer. Here too reference is made to a theoretical base that will
require adjustment based on the internal samples but also the type of mill and the desired fineness.
It is clear that in open-circuit the charge has to be improved to obtain the desired fineness at the mill discharge;
the same applies for a very fine product.
The finer the charge, the finer the product, the greater the risk of coating that will have to be minimized with better
ventilation, failing that with a grinding aid.
A problem often encountered is the multiplicity of products for a given mill. In that case a grinding charge for both
compartments needs to be determined to reach a compromise between optimum charges for each product.
The finer the grinding charge the longer the material will be retained in the mill.
To give an idea of the differences the charge makes between an open and closed circuit, the retention time is:
3 to 5 min in closed circuit
15 to 20 min. in open circuit
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
27
IV - 4 - 6 - Retention time
Fluorescein
introduction
Compartment 1 Compartment 2
Sampling
location
The procedure consists of introducing a tracer and to take samples at regular intervals at the mill discharge
(fluorescein, impregnated on the product either with alcohol for clinker or water for raw mix, is used).
The suggested dosage is 2 g / t of feed. The introduction of fluorescein and the sampling must take place as
close as possible to the mill inlet and outlet.
In plotting a fluorescein concentration curve with time, the retention time at the maximum concentration peak is
obtained (graph hereafter).
From the retention time, the mass of material in the mill can be calculated and a C/M ratio that should be between
8 and 12 can be determined. The C/M ratio only puts a number on the average material level through the entire
mill. The material level should be determined visually during the internal inspection of each compartment.
C = Ball mass
M = Mass of material in the mill
In practice this gives reliable results for a compound mill but this is rarely the case for a birotator mill.
This phenomenon can be explained by the fact that the retention time is determined by the maximum intensity
peak, whereas it would be preferable perhaps to calculate it by surface integration.
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
28
The procedure doubles up the internal inspection, and given its mediocre precision, is almost never used to-day.
It can still be used relatively speaking to compare an operation with another (tests on circulating charges for
example) because it offers the advantage of not requiring the stoppage and opening of the mill gates.
90
80
70
Max. 4 min.
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Time (min.)
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
29
V -SEPARATION BALANCE
The separation balance is done on the separator and allows deduction to be made of its performance coordinates
as much from the standpoint of the characteristic values as for the various material flows.
It is produced from data obtained from material samples taken at both the separator inlet and outlet.
From the particle size distribution analysis of the separator inflow and outflow, a distribution curve is plotted
(abscissa in logarithmic coordinates, ordinate in normal distribution coordinates).
From at least one given flow, the separator inflows and outflows (taken from the average R/A calculation) are
calculated as well as the circulating charge.
Reminder: Additional details of this calculation can be found in the section “Finishing mill operation”.
Feed
Separator
Rejects
Fines
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
30
Note: The distribution curve should be calculated over the entire inflows and outflows. If the separator
is ventilated, the dust carried by the gases must be included.
Where:
- A, R, F = feed, rejects and fines flows (t/h)
- “X” = index characterizing a size fraction
- ax, rx, fx = feed proportion (rejects and fines respectively) in the size fraction X
- A • ax is the material flow (t/h) in size fraction X at the feed end
R fx - ax
From these 2 equations : (x) = is obtained
A fx - rx
R R
(x) is the ratio predicted by the particle size distribution of size fraction x
A A
For the overall particle-size distribution, the average R/A ratio is the integration of all the size fractions and can be
summarized after simplification by the formula:
On the other hand the probability (Px) for an inflow grain of size x to end up with the rejects can be expressed:
Rrx
Px =
Aax
Average R rx
A
Px =
R rx + (1 - Average R ) fx
Average
A A
The average sieve size of each size fraction can be calculated by the formula:
dx = (d1 • d2)
The separator distribution curve is drawn by plotting on the graph the function : px = f(dx)
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
31
2 straight lines are obtained, the first, slightly inclined (zone where the separator does not recognize the size of
the particles, if not globally) and the second, more inclined, called acuity line (zone where the separator
recognizes the size of the particles).
Example of a calculation of the beginning of the distribution curve found in the appendix.
(1) - (2) (88.91 • 76.32) ^ 0.5 = 82.4 97.81 - 95.72 = 74.54 - 67.36 = 60.78 - 50.64 = 89.9 0.636
2.09 7.18 10.14
(2) - (3) (76.32 • 65.51) ^ 0.5 = 70.7 95.72 - 92.71 = 67.36 - 59.89 = 50.64 - 41.04 = 85.4 0.677
3.01 7.47 9.60
(3) - (4) (65.51 • 56.23) ^ 0.5 = 60.7 92.71 - 88.68 = 59.89 - 52.74 = 41.04 - 32.21 = 80.1 0.650
4.03 7.15 8.83
(4) - (5) 56.23 • 48.27) ^ 0.5 = 52.1 88.68 - 83.60 = 52.74 - 46.03 = 32.21 - 24.49 = 73.6 0.617
5.08 6.71 7.72
etc.
Average 0.647
R/A
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
32
It is from the distribution curve that the separator operating parameters are determined.
99.9
99.8
99.5
99
98
95
90
Fines cumulated yield curve
80
70
60
50
40 Line slope =
30
imperfection
20
10
Bypass
reading
Intersection point of the 2 lines
2
1
0.5
0.2
0.1
1 10 Acuity limit reading 100
The Lafarge circulating charge is the ratio of the rejects flow over the fines flow, expressed as a percentage
R/A
Lafarge CC = R / F may be expressed in the form of CC =
1-R/A
Quite often suppliers use the ratio of the feed flow over the fines flow as a definition of the circulating charge or
call it the circulation rate.
Supplier CC = A/F
= 1 + Lafarge CC
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
33
- b - Flow calculation
The distribution curve has allowed the calculation of the average R/A, i.e. the rejects flow with respect to the feed
flow.
Assuming any given flow and with the equation: A = R + F, it is easy to recalculate the other 2 flows.
- c - Acuity limit
It is the minimum particle size that can be recognized by the separator. It is expressed in micrometers and is the
abscissa of the intersection point of the 2 lines.
- d - Bypass
It is the minimum probability for a particle to end up in the rejects. It is expressed as a percentage and is the
ordinate of the intersection point of the 2 lines.
The bypass should be as low as possible but is influenced by the circulating charge (the type of separator aside).
This is why a “corrected bypass” free of the circulating charge is calculated using the formula:
rejects flow
The Lafarge circulating charge being defined by the ratio:
fines flow
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
34
- e - Imperfection
d 75 - d 25
I =
2 • d 50
d 25, d 50 and d 75 (µm) being the abscissa of the corresponding coordinates Px at 25, 50 and 75%.
The lower the imperfection (hence the steeper the slope) the better the separation.
The imperfection is also a function of the bypass. Therefore a “normalized imperfection” is calculated from the
Tromp curve, with no bypass, using the formula:
The “normalized imperfection” is then calculated by the same formula as that of the gross imperfection. A
parameter which is the stripping dimension is also used. It is the sieve size for which a particle has as much
chance to end up in the rejects as in the fines.
(1 - average R/A) = Fx / Ax
A curve showing the cumulative percentage of the feed particles going into the fines is obtained, the maximum
percentage being called fines cumulative yield.
This yield gives a better prediction of the separator efficiency than the bypass.
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
35
V - 4 - Rosin-Rammler Slope
It defines the range of the particle-size distribution of the separator fines and is calculated from the laser analysis.
Draw on a graph (abscissae in logarithmic coordinates, ordinates in decimal coordonates) the relationship: Ln Ln
(proportion of cumulative rejects) = f (Ln sieve size).
Rosin-Rammler adjustment
98.9
93.4
80.8
63.2
45.5
% passing
30.8
20.0
12.7
7.9
4.9
3.0
1.8
1 10 100
Sieve size (µm)
- total slope: from 2 µm to x µm (x µm is the maximum sieve size that produces a very good correlation
coefficient)
- from 2 to 30 µm for a fine product
- from 2 to 20 µm for a very fine product
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
36
V - 5 - Separator inspection
V - 5 - 1 - Static separators
Static separators are connected to the mill ventilation and can be adjusted only one way: by tilting the blades.
The blades are tilted in such a way that be fineness of the filter dust is compatible with that of the finished product.
The more tangential the blades (the static is closed) the higher the fineness of the fines.
Fines
Adjustable blades
Thimble
Inner cone
Outer cone
Rejects
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
37
☞ Check the condition of the ventilation blades. Record their quantity and dimensions.
Tilt
Measure the distance to the casing (interior liners) and the diaphragm
diaphragm d
h
casing d
L
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
38
Motor shaft
Selector blades
Ventilating blades
Diaphragm
control
Casing
Air flow
Rejects
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
39
Fresh air
Feed
Exhaust
Cyclone
Table
Recycling ventilator
Fines
Rejects
The ventilation and the fines recovery with external cyclone on the 2nd generation separators produce a better
fines recovery than the 1st generation separators.
Ventilation being important as it reduces the temperature of the finished product, these separators also produce
better raw mill drying results.
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
40
☞ Check the condition of the fixed blades (O’SEPA) sometimes adjustable with other makes (SEPOL).
Fines
Cage
Primary air
Fixed blades
Rejects
rd
3 Generation Separator (O’SEPA)
It is the type of separator which right now produces the best separation performances.
On the other hand if the type of separator does not take as much space, i.e. requires a larger filter since all the
production goes through it, contrary to the 1st and 2nd generation separators where the filter only handles the dust.
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
41
It is always interesting to use as many sieve sizes as possible, however the smallest mesh should be less than 2
µm for the sake of analysis accuracy.
The largest selected sieve size should be that which corresponds, for the fines, to the percentage immediately
lower than the 100% passing.
Instantaneously, a separator is not perfectly stable this is why it is better to smooth out these fluctuations by
taking samples of material several times.
At each location, take 4 to 6 samples of equal mass over a period of about 2 hours and place in a box These
samples after homogenization will be analyzed by laser.
It is also possible, with one person available at each sampling location, to take 4 to 5 samples over a period of 5
to 10 min.
This procedure is used when controlling the operation of the separator during regular tests. The distribution curve
calculation should be done from material samples taken from all the separator inlets and outlets (simple case p
29).
Separator
Dust (P)
Dust collector
Rejects (R)
Finished
Product (F) Fines (Fs)
In this case A = R + Fs + P
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
42
☞ All that is required is to take samples of material at locations: A, R and F for the calculation of the
distribution curve.
This is certainly the most complex case encountered in finishing mills where a filter handles at the same time
grinding mill dust and separator dust.
To plot the distribution curve, determine the separator outlet dust and fines flows, then recalculate a particle-size
distribution of these 2 flows in proportion to the outputs.
In practice this requires the elaboration of the material balance and part of the finishing mill air flow balance.
☞ Fines from the grinding mill + separator dust collector (Bb + Pb)
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
43
☞ Additionally a first hypothesis must be made on the dust concentration at the mill outlet
It ranges between 200 and 600 g / m3. (Average values since concentrations in excess of 1000 g/m3 have been
encountered under high ventilation in a small diameter duct.
☞ The 2nd hypothesis consists of considering, in terms of particle-size distribution and BSS, that: P = Pa +
Pb and B = Ba = Bb.
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
44
Calculation method
Based on the estimated dust concentration and grinding mill outlet air flow, the mill outlet total dust tonnage is
calculated.
The distribution between mill filter and mill + separator filter branches is done in proportion to the air flows of each
branch.
This equation is resolved given that y is known (hypothesis of the mill outlet dust concentration in proportion to the
air flows) as well as the BSS.
The dust flow to the separator filter is calculated in proportion to the air flows of the branches coming out the
separator and the calculated separator dust flow to the separator + mill filter.
The material flow of the 3 filters being therefore known, the separator fines flow (Fs) remains to be deduced.
For the calculation of the distribution curve, calculate a reconstituted particle-size distribution (size by size) of the
total fines (F) based on the grading of the fines (Fs) and dust (P) in proportion to their respective flows.
The separator feed flow (A), calculated from the distribution curve, corresponds to that calculated by the elevator
power (knowledge of the elevator characteristics required).
The measured Blaine fineness of the finished product with that obtained by the addition of the Blaine fineness of
the 3 filters + separator fines (Fs) in proportion to their respective flows.
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
45
The values of the distribution curve parameters depend highly on the circulating charge. Here is what is usually
obtained with properly controlled finishing mills.
- a - The acuity limit testifies of the ability of a separator to strip a finished product.
- b - The bypass corresponds to the minimum probability of a particle to end up with the rejects. The higher it is,
greater is the amount of fine product returning to the mill, which is inefficient.
- c - The imperfection gives an idea of the separation difficulty. The higher it is, the less sharp is the stripping
and the higher the amount of coarse particles in the finished product.
For the 3rd generation separators, a ventilation criterion characterized by the following ratios is determined:
- Qf / Qa, kg / m3
- Qp / Qa, kg / m3
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
46
VI - MATERIAL BALANCE
The material balance gives the flow of material in each circuit branch.
The most important point lies, without a doubt, with the separator and its circulating charge which was discussed
in the previous section.
It also quantifies the filter fines flow. A filter overloaded with material will give a poor performance and create air
flow problems.
For electrostatic filters, manufacturers use a dimension ratio of: 10 to 50 m2 / 1000 m3 / h to obtain stack dust in
the order of 30 to 40 mg 1 m3.
(Surface area of collecting electrodes with respect to the gas flow through the filter).
If the volume of the filter inlet dust is too large, it is more than likely that the concentration of the filter outlet dust
will increase.
For bag-house filters, the dimension ratio varies between 60 and 140 m3 / h / m2 (filtration velocity or working rate)
which corresponds to velocities ranging from 1 to 2.3 m / min. It defines, based on the gas flow, the surface area
of the filtering medias.
With this kind of filters, if there is sequential unclogging, a material overload will translate into an increase of filter
loss of charge causing air flow problems.
If there is unclogging by a loss of charge, an increase in the energy required for the cleaning of the bags will
become apparent.
VI - 2 - Calculation principle
The flow of the finished product in a dry state is equal to the feed flow. This is known.
On certain installations provided with mass measurements of rejects, this flow is also known. It is used as a basis
of calculation but more currently used for checking the dynamic separator distribution curve and the different
computations resulting from the junction calculation method.
The calculation of the flow traveling in the elevator (under its own power) is also more of a checking mean than a
basis of calculation.
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
47
It is very difficult to know the power efficiency of the motor and in practice the verification consists of confirming
the suitable efficiency of the motor (about 0.9).
Using an installation diagram as shown in section VI-4, the calculation principle can be described as follows:
☞ Starting from the finished product flow, the separator feed and rejects flows are determined from the
The separator feed flow that will be used as a basis for the evaluation of the elevator is now known.
☞ For the elevator, the filter and mill outlet flows are determined using the junction calculation method.
☞ On this simple installation, 2 distribution curves were sufficient to establish the material balance.
☞ If additional junctions are encountered, the same method is applied as often as necessary.
The same procedure is used to determine the material flow in the installation. This is what is called the junction
calculation method. The principle is that of a distribution curve but only the average R/A ratio is retained. Given
one flow the other 2 can be calculated knowing that: A = R + F.
As a matter of fact, in separators there is particle sorting and the particle-size distribution of the various flows are
very different.
The junction calculation method derived from the distribution curve is more random precisely because the
particle-size distribution of the different material flows are too close.
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
48
This could translate into an average R/A > 1, which is impossible since to meet: A = R + F, F would have to be
negative.
In this instance, except when weighing trucks, an attempt can be made to calculate the different flows using the
global fineness (BSS).
By the same principle, a reduced simplified heat balance of the 3 points can be established.
In this perspective, at least one temperature reading at each material sampling location should be made during
the sampling process. Actually this temperature procedure is used more to confirm the Blaine method than to
determine the various material flows.
Wall losses cannot be taken into account. Moreover, the thermocouple reaction time allows time for the material
to cool down slightly. (The thinnest possible thermocouple, although mechanically weak, should be selected to
obtain a better reaction time). Another alternative for a filter is to assume a dust concentration of the gas flows
entering the filter and calculate the material flow with respect to the gas flows. (Case of the mill + separator filter -
pp 41 & 42).
VI - 3 - 3 - Other methods
Certain installations are now equipped with separator rejects scale providing a way to verify part of the material
balance.
Another verification is possible by calculating the elevator flow based on its power (and its characteristics).
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
49
☞ Take material samples on the 3 branches each time 2 material flows intersect to form a third one, or
3
E
L
Separator Separator E
Filter Mill Separator
V
A
5 T 2
O
Finished Product R
4
Mill
Feed 1
Case of a finishing mill equipped with a 3rd generation separator. The mill filter dust is returned to the separator
by the elevator.
☞ In the above case, take samples at locations 3, 4 and 5 needed for the distribution curve.
☞ The separator feed being made up of mill outlet + mill filter material flows, samples should be taken at
The number of samples and sampling frequencies are the same as for those used for the determination of the
distribution curve. Samples taken around the separator form an integral part of the material balance. After
homogenization of each sample, the particle-size distribution should be determined (laser) as well as fineness
(BSS).
For drying mills, it is preferable to express the material balance on a dry basis.
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
50
VI - 5 - Numerical example
- a - Separator flow
Feed flow = finished product flow (location 5) = 100 t/h (dry basis)
- b - Elevator flow
The elevator flows (locations 1, 2 and 3) must now be calculated.
Separator Feed
(location 3)
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
51
The only known flow is the separator feed. Using the junction calculation method (simplified distribution curve)
the mill discharge (location 1) and mill filter dust (location 2) flows are then calculated.
The material balance has therefore been established for the installation. However it is necessary to check the
calculated flows mainly around the elevator.
- Verification by fineness
On the basis of the flows and the fineness of the materials entering the elevator, the elevator discharge fineness
should be close to 20000 cm2/g.
Given the precision of the Blaine test, a 100 to 200 points variation is deemed acceptable.
In the present case, the Blaine 40 points variation confirms the validity of the flows calculated by the junction
calculation method.
An efficiency of 0.91 is a suitable value confirming also the flow entering the elevator.
The flows can also be verified by the material temperature using the same principle as for fineness.
This method is however less accurate since abstraction is made of wall losses. It is used when the 3 flow
finesses are almost identical.
- Weighing of rejects. It is increasingly more common to have a scale installed to weight the separator
rejects and to serve as a mill operation parameter.
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
52
VI - 6 - Interpretations of results
Notwithstanding the difficulty in reconstituting the particle-size distribution of the total fines (see distribution curve
section), there is generally no or very few problems with the distribution curve of dry dynamic separators.
On the other hand, difficulties are encountered when establishing the static separator inflows and outflows.
The other problems stem mainly from the calculations by the junction calculation method and are of 2 types:
- sample representativity
- too close a particle-size distribution of the materials making up the flows.
VI - 6 - 1 - Static separator
Right now nobody seems to know how to take samples of gas-suspended materials. This is why materials are
sampled strictly where only materials circulate (airslides, chutes, belt conveyors, ...).
It is practically impossible, for this reason, to produce a distribution curve with a static separator (no sampling of
materials at the static separator inlet).
Consequently, if the fines flow can be calculated, the static separator rejects and feed flows cannot. The only
solution is to estimate a rejects flow. Another solution would be truck weighing which could be useful for filter dust
for instance.
This is rarely done for practical reason and also because too risky for the quality of the finished product.
For a filter with a small flow, weighing would have to be done over one or several hours to be suitable but then
what would happen to the fineness of the finished product without filter dust?
VI - 6 - 2 - Sample representativity
With bag-house filters in particular, fineness is not always uniform in relation to unclogging cycles and the material
flow is sequential.
Quite often filters unload in airslides which do not have blending capability.
Material sampling resulting from the sum of a filter + separator fines for example, in an airslide, will become
hampered.
At times only separator fines will be sampled, at other times, a filter blend having a higher flow compared to the
average will be sampled.
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
53
Hence the need to increase the number of samples to smooth out this phenomenon.
A second source of error is due to the existing depression (caused by dusting). It is a depression which, when the
scoop is withdrawn from the duct, will lose a portion of the surface layer of the material and as a result may distort
the particle-size distribution.
The best way to counteract this phenomenon is to use a scoop that can be closed before being pulled out of the
duct in order to eliminate the depression inside the sampler.
Simple samplers
“Anti-depression” samplers
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
54
The balance determines the ventilation of each equipment, chiefly the mill and dynamic separator.
Initial air inleakage can also be located and quantified by a drop in output and energy increase of the draft
ventilator.
For drying mills, this also serves as a basis for the drying balance.
An air flow measurement must be made at the inlet and outlet of each equipment (repeat the measurements to
make sure of the result). In ducts, the gas streams must be as stable as possible, and not subjected to
turbulences. Turbulences are generated by elbows, guide vanes, a change in section - - - -.
The measurement should preferably be made over 3/4 of a long and straight portion (8 to 10 times the diameter of
the duct). Unfortunately it is not always possible and to minimize the error, testing is done on 2 diameters at 90˚.
5Ø 3Ø 2 Measurement Axis
Gas Direction
2 Ø exploration at 90°
Measurement Axis
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
55
Propellor
Propellor
Reader
Length
dial
Timer
They are made on so-called “open” sections such as ventilator horn, mill fresh air inlet...
An integrating anemometer is used that cumulates length with time during the measurements.
The “maxant” anemometer is equipped with 2 dials. The first one gives length (m), the second, time (s).
By dividing length by time, velocity (m/s) is obtained. Nowadays electronic anemometers give directly the velocity
measurement. By multiplying the acceleration by the cross section, the flow in m3/s is obtained.
m3 • 273
NM3 =
273 + Ø
Note:
Rectangular ducts: It is considered that in corners there is none or very little flow. Hence a 0.96 coefficient is
used in the calculation of the cross-section: S + L • 1 • 0.96
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
56
Either a pitot tube (clean gas flows), or a type R pitot tube, or a Strauscheib tube (dust-laden gas flows) is used.
Strauscheib
Pitot
Dynamic
pressure
Static
pressure
Total
pressure
Pressure
meter
The formula used is drawn for Bernoulli’s law and applies to clean gases.
V= 2•g•h
ρ
Where V = Velocity ( m/s)
g = 9.81
h = Measured dynamic pressure average (mmCE)
p = Gas unit mass (kg/m3)
But it is necessary beforehand to calculate the unit mass of the gases taking into account first their composition
and then apply a temperature and pressure correction.
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
57
In general for clinker mills, the unit mass of the dry air gases (P0 = 1.293 kg/m3) is used if the additions are in
small quantity and the moisture is low. If not, it must be recalculated based on the gas analysis.
A flow in m3 is obtained that will require a temperature and pressure correction to obtain a flow in NM3/h.
The dynamic pressure is read directly on the meter by connecting the total and static pressures. Dynamic
pressure = total pressure = static pressure.
Notes: Rectangular ducts: it is considered that in corners there is none or little flow. Hence a 0.96 coefficient
is applied for the calculation of the cross-section: S = L • 1 • 0.96.
- Strauscheib or Pitot type R tube: The static pressure is measured opposite the total pressure (Pitot
tube at 90°) and therefore a correction coefficient (k) must be determined in the laboratory (or supplied by the
manufacturer) and applied directly to the calculated velocity. For a Pitot tube k = 1.
Nonetheless the Bernoulli formula is applied (no other means are known today) by correcting the unit mass of the
gases from the dust concentration.
Calculate the unit mass of the gases with the temperature and static pressure correction, then add to it the dust
concentration (kg/m3).
ρ total (kg / m3) = (ρ0 gas • temperature correction • pressure correction) + dust
The dust concentration is determined after doing the material balance (the hourly amount of material moving in
the duct is then known).
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
58
3
Proceed by iteration until the gas flow (m /n) • dust concentration equals the material flow transported in the duct.
Strauscheib tube measurements are subject to criticism and this should be remembered when completing the air
flow balance.
2•g•h
V=k•
ρ + dust Q m3 / s = V • cross section
Numerical example
In the configuration of the finishing mill (p 49), the material balance gives a mill filter material flow of 36.15 t / h.
An air flow measurement was done with the Strauscheib tube in the mill discharge duct leading to the mill filter.
A first analysis, omitting the dust, reveals a flow of 108 000 m3 / h with a ρ for gases of 0.928.
The dust concentration is calculated to be 36.15 • 106 / 108 000 = 335 g / m3 of dust.
Now proceed by iteration, since by including the ρ dust corrections, the flow will change.
The new ρ will then become 0.928 + 0.335 = 1.263. This will give a flow of 92 700 m3 / h.
The dust flow will then become 335 • 106 • 92,700 = 31 t/h instead of 36.15 as desired.
The new dust concentration is 36.15 x 106 / 92,000 = 390 g / m3. Repeat the calculations by iteration until the
obtention of : dust concentration • flow = 36.15 t/h.
On the Pitot calculation sheet, use the target value function which will immediately give the correct dust
concentration value.
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
59
They are used to recalculate the gas unit mass but will also serve when doing the drying balance (moisture).
They must be done at the same locations as the air flow measurements if the composition of the gases varies (air
inleakage, material drying).
The O2 and CO2 analyses are done by pumping the gases out of the duct and the test gases are dried before
going through the various analyzers. The actual analysis should be recalculated taking moisture in the duct into
account.
In a cement plant, the essential analyses involve O2, CO2, N2 and H2O.
O2 and CO2 are determined dry, H2O as is. N2 = 100% - (% actual O2 + actual CO2 + % H2O) • % actual gas =
% dry gas • (1 - proportion of H2O)
H2O is analyzed either by pumping, or by measuring the dry and humid temperatures.
O2 Analyser
Test gas
CO/CO2 analyser
Gas analyzers
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
60
Except when using the technique consisting of sweeping the surface with a regular motion, there are no particular
problems with small and large dimensions.
On the other hand, with big horns (> 1 m) at times the sweeping may not give good results (case of the separator
fresh air intake - Martres BK4 where the separator air flow closure was not good).
A point by point measurement on 2 axis at 90° has allowed the closure of the separator air flow balance and
meeting the plant annubars.
- a - Exploration
Most of the time, a regular depth exploration is used instead of taking an equivalent surface ring measurement
which requires a depth recording for each duct.
In the case of regular depths, instead of calculating the arithmetical mean of the dynamic pressures, the root
mean is determined.
This method gives good results provided the gas flows are not too irregular. If the gas flows are too irregular, the
equivalent surface ring exploration should be done.
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
61
The diagram and table below provide the depths based on the number of measurement points for a 1 m diameter
duct.
Positioning of the measurement points of the equivalent surface rings
D 1m
Table for D = 1 m
d1
Distance from
d2 Number of points Point designation
the edge
d3 6 a1 0.044
a2 0.146
a3 0.296
B A
a4 0.704
a5 0.854
a6 0.956
a1 0.032
8
a2 0.105
a3 0.194
a4 0.323
a5 0.677
a6 0.806
6 5 4 3 2 1
a7 0.895
a8 0.968
10 a1 0.026
a2 0.082
a3 0.146
a4 0.226
a1 a5 0.342
a6 0.685
a2 a7 0.774
a3 B a8 0.854
A
a4 a9 0.918
a 10 0.974
a5 a1 0.021
12
a6 a2 0.067
a3 0.118
a4 0.177
a5 0.250
a6 0.356
The indicated values in the Table apply
a7 0.644
only for D = 1 m a8 0.750
a9 0.823
a 10 0.882
For D = x, multiply the values by x a 11 0.933
a 12 0.979
- b- Dust-Laden Atmospheres
In case of dust-laden atmospheres, the standard Pitot tube gets plugged up too rapidly and the flow cannot be
measured.
Hence, either a Straucheib or Type P Pitot tube is used. Their main feature is that they are provided with a total
pressure - taking opening that is bigger than that of the standard Pitot Tube. It will get plugged up also but less
rapidly allowing a measurement to be made.
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
62
The rapidity with which plugging takes place is not in itself an indication of the dust concentration in the duct.
Other phenomena such as the nature and fineness of the dust come into play.
Contrary to what may be thought, when plugging occurs, the observed dynamic pressure suddenly increases.
Static
Pressure
- c - Dirty Conduits
It occurs sometime that a conduit in an almost level position and carrying dust, becomes dirty.
This can be the case of a conduit where dust-laden gases circulate between the tower and a drying mill. Also,
tower gases are moist and humidity promotes sticking at the base of the conduit (during stoppage, this
phenomenon is amplified by condensation) The gas circulation cross section becomes artificially reduced and the
effective cross-section must be calculated.
h
initial Ø
accumulated
material
The easiest way in that case to calculate the effective cross-section for gas circulation of is to use the mill filling
rate procedure.
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
63
O2 and CO2 analyses are done by pumping over a very short time (1 to 2 min.) and should be confirmed once or
twice.
The moisture analysis by pumping takes much longer (30 min. to 2 hours depending on the moisture level) and
can be checked in case of doubt, being understood that testing must be conducted during stable mill operation.
The moisture analysis under dry humid temperatures is spotty and should be checked one or twice.
- by pumping: it covers everything (particularly dust-laden gases) and integrate with time.
Its main drawback is the set-up (electrical pump, meter, silicagel, sampling lance).
☞ Make sure you place a glasswool pad at the end of the lance to filter the dust.
☞ Make sure you limit condensation between the lance outlet and the silicagel (the shortest possible
distance). Incline the lance towards the silicagel to capture any possible condensation.
Moisture calculation:
The volume of absorbed water is in fact a mass of water to be translated into volume.
22.4 l = volume occupied by a mole of gas. The correspondence of the units gives Nm3.
18 g = molar mass of water. The correspondence of the units gives kg.
- by dry humid temperatures: spot measurements must be limited specially to the exhaust gases.
Drawbacks: there can be no dust (it will stick to the damp cotton and distort the measurement).
The dry temperature should not exceed 110 to 120 ° C otherwise the cotton dries very rapidly and the
measurement becomes impossible.
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
64
Watch the humid temperature because it will progressively increase to a certain level; read it and switch over to
the dry temperature; read it immediately. Humidity readings are done using humid air Tables.
In drying mill circuits, air inleakage can be calculated with the O2 or CO2 elements or both which are influential
elements.
But it is necessary for reasonable accuracy to have different analyses of the ambient air. This is why these
calculations cannot be made unless the hot drying gases originate from a tower or a grate.
outlet O2 - intake O2
% air inleakage / intake = 100
20.94 - outlet O2
•
Caution: The analyses being run on a dry basis, the air inleakage percentage is expressed on a dry basis.
Example:
Intake Outlet
O2 = 8% (as measured) O2 = 11.5 % (as measured)
CO2 = 25% (as measured) CO2 = 15.5 % (as measured)
H2O = 8% (as measured) H2O = 18.2 % (as measured)
10,000 Nm3/h (as measured) 15,000 Nm3/h (as measured
MILL
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
65
The moist measured intake flow is 10,000 Nm3 / h at 8% H2O = 9,200 Nm3 / h dry and 800 Nm3 / h water.
The calculated air inleakage averages 37.5%.
The dry flow at the outlet will be 9,200 • (1 + 0.375) = 12,650 Nm3 / h representing an air inleakage of 3,450 Nm3
/h.
Let’s assume that the ambient air contains 2% moisture.
The water carried by the air inleakage will be : 12,650 + 800 + 2,00 + 70 = 15,520 Nm3 (to be compared with the
measurement taken).
800 = volume of water contained in the intake gases.
2,000 = volume of the material evaporable water in the mill (drying).
79 = volume of water carried by the air linkeage.
The outlet moisture will be : (800 + 2,000 + 90) / 15,520 = 18.5% (to be compared with the measurement taken).
“Moist”
silicagel Thermometer
Sampling
“Dry” lance
silicagel
Reservoir
Pump Meter
Dry / humid
switch
Readers
Dry
thermocouple
Humid thermocouple
An important aspect of the air flow balance is the determination of the mill ventilation.
It is expressed as a fictitious gas velocity in the mill in empty tube equivalent. All that is needed is to divide the
actual gas volume by the internal cross-section of the mill.
As a general rule, the actual volume is calculated at 100° C which is an average temperature in a mill
It is very difficult to measure the volume of gas crossing the mill, although 2 possibilities exist.
1st by measuring the tube outlet flow but in this case it is distorted (by excess) by the air inleakage, namely at the
trommel outlet. This is what can be qualified as an optimistic hypothesis.
2nd by measuring the tube inlet flow, but in this case it is distorted (by default) by the impossibility of measuring
the air entering with the material. This is what can be qualified as a pessimistic hypothesis. The actual value
stands between these 2 hypotheses.
The ventilation ratio for a mill is: in open circuit, from 0.6 to 0.8 m/s
in closed circuit, from 1 to 1.5 m/s
If the finishing mill is equipped with a static separator, the ventilation can be increased up to 2 m/s provided the
static fines are compatible with the finished product.
Also:
- gas velocity at 100° C over the charge (varies according to filling rate)
in open circuit from 0.8 to 1.2 m/s
in closed circuit from 1.4 to 2.1 m/s
- specific ventilation in Nm3 / kg of finished product (varies according to mill output, and gives an
evaluation of the cooling / drying potential.
The ratio ranges from 0.3 to 1 Nm3 / h of finished product depending on the installation.
Currently, in finishing mills equipped with 3rd generation high-efficiency dynamic separator, it is preferable to
return the dust-collected fines at the base of the elevator. This allows a strong ventilation of the tube and
furthermore it is an assurance of quality of the finished product.
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
67
The balance allows material drying optimization and the quantification of the drying energy required.
Therefore it is possible to give priority to the optimization of the energy supplied by the heat source especially if
the latter is generated by a furnace (saving on the purchase of fuel).
It is sometimes possible to give consideration to a drying balance on a clinker mill when a cementitious addition is
very damp and used in large proportion.
In this case the question is to find out if it is useful to add hot gases to the mill or if the heat produced by the mill is
sufficient.
The drying balance is in fact combined with a heat balance because besides knowing where the water in the
material is eliminated and in what amount, 2 ratios are determined that are related to the energies involved.
The first ratio is the theoretical drying efficiency which is the total energy provided at the inlet per kg of
evaporation water.
Total energy means the energy supplied by the heat source but also by the sensible heat from the inlet gases and
materials (the reference used is 0° C).
This ratio may also be expressed as a percentage of the theoretical vaporization (596 kcal / kg of water) to the
total supplied energy.
The second ratio is the useful drying efficiency which is the pure energy provided at the inlet per kg of
evaporation water. The pure energy is strictly coming from the heat source(s).
☞ Measure (flow, temperature) and analyze(H2O) the gas flows coming in and out of the installation and for
each equipment if it is desired to find out more precisely when water evaporation takes place.
☞ Sample (flow, temperature) and analyze (H2O) the materials coming in and out of the installation and for
each equipment if it is desired to find out more precisely when water evaporation takes place.
☞ In the case of a furnace the fuel analysis and flow (pure energy) should be obtained but also all the
amount of air entering the furnace (primary and diluted).
It is essential for the calculation of the volume of the combustion smokes and their analysis. It is frequently
difficult to measure the gas flow at the mill inlet (very short duct).
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
68
Determination of the water flow in and out of the circuit or for each equipment or both.
- Material
Volume of water (Nm3/h) = material flow (kg/h) • H2O proportion • 22.4 / 18
Mass of water (kg/h) = actual gas flow (Nm3/h) • H2O proportion
- Gas
Volume of water (Nm3/h) = actual gas flow (Nm3/h) • H2O proportion
Mass of water (kg/h) = actual gas flow (Nm3/h) • H2O proportion • 18 / 22.4
- Air inleakage
Don’t forget that ambient air carries water
The loss of water in the material in an equipment is called vaporization and is often expressed in
Nm3/h)
It is expressed in kcal / h (or kJ / h) and covers, except in special cases, the entire circuit. It is expressed by
reference to 0° C.
- Material
Sensible heat (kcal / h) = material flow (kg/h) • temperature • average specific heat at the
temperature (kcal / kg).
- Gas
Sensible heat (kcal / h) = material flow (Nm3/h) • temperature • average specific heat at the
temperature (kcal / Nm3/h).
- Fuel
Sensible heat (kcal / h) = fuel flow (kg/h) • temperature • average specific heat at the temperature
(kcal / kg).
Combustion energy (kcal / h) = fuel flow (kg / h) • inferior heat capacity (kcal / kg).
- Mill
Part of the mill energy is transformed into heat and is included in the heat balance.
Heat supplied (kcal / h) = mill power (kW) • 1 h • proportion of transformed energy • 860.
860 : 1 kWh = 860 kcal.
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
69
Note:
I HP = 0.735 kW 1 kW = 1.36 HP
1W=1J/s 1 kW = 1 kJ / s
- wall losses
They are not measured but estimated
A percentage of the sum of the intakes is used (kcal / h)
- vaporization
Do not forget, in the outlets, that the vaporization of water at 0° C uses 596 kcal / kg of evaporated water.
A vaporization value at 0° C is taken since the balance is expressed by reference to 0° C.
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
70
For economical reasons, the contribution of hot gases should be minimized (specially if there is a furnace), but at
the same time a certain outlet temperature must be maintained to avoid water condensation in the filter (risk of
bag plugging and possible corrosion).
It is considered that an outlet temperature in excess of 25 to 30° C above the dew point should be
maintained.
In general, on standard installations, the heat source is controlled so as to maintain a mill outlet temperature at
around 80 to 85° C which is sufficient to prevent condensation in the filter.
The ambient air humidity varies with the climate, so the easiest way is to contact the local weather bureau.
For information:
It can be seen that as a first attempt, only a very small error can be make on the drying balance by considering
the ambient air humidity to be between 1 and 3% based on the temperature.
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
71
The lower the theoretical and useful drying efficiencies the better the drying optimization.
On very efficient installations the theoretical efficiency ranges from 1,100 to 1,200 kcal / kg of evaporation water.
It is usual to see theoretical efficiencies between 1,400 and 1,500 kcal / kg of evaporated water, in particular,
even when the material moisture is low when the installation operates under favorable conditions.
- mill
The electric power of motors is recorded and do not forget the electric motor performance when
calculating the actual power transmitted to the mill.
It is estimated that 80 to 90% of the electrical energy of a ball mill is transformed into heat.
- wall losses
They are not measured because they represent only a small fraction of the heat balance.
The analysis and site measurement of wall losses are very time concerning.
It is estimated that wall losses range between 5 and 10% of the total energy input.
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
72
IX - ENERGY BALANCE
This balance, contrary to others, does not allow the detection of a precise area of operation problem.
This is above all a global indicator of the operation of an installation that is expressed in kWh / t of finished
product.
It is possible however to quantify the energy required for each equipment and the total energy required to produce
one tonne of finished product.
By regularly following up this ratio for each product, any possible drifting along the way can be detected. Any
such drifting will be an incentive for finding what causes it by reviewing the other balances.
An increase in kWh / t is often the result of a drop in production (same energy consumption but a lower divider).
IX - 2 - Energy balance
- mill motor
- elevator
- dynamic separator motor(s)
- exhaust ventilator(s)
- dynamic separator fresh air ventilator
The other pieces of equipment such as auxiliary dust collectors, air slides, pneumex, are not included in the
“process” energy balance. They are normally integrated in the overall circuit total.
☞ Sample on the conveyor belts (once is enough) all the ingredients entering the mill.
The BB10 mill is a calibrated laboratory mill which gives the theoretical “process” energy required to grind a
material at a desired fineness.
The test is conducted on the reconstituted finished product (ingredients sampled from the conveyor belts).
A curve is plotted with the kWh / t in ordinate and the corresponding finenesses in abscissa.
For raw mixes, the fineness is expressed in amount retained on the 100 µm mesh.
The kWh / t of the circuit corresponds to the fineness of the finished product.
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
73
If the mill operates under good conditions, the same fineness should correspond fairly well to the same BB10
kWh/t.
50
40
30
20
14
12
10
2
% retained on 100 µm mesh
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
74
IX - 3 - Interpretations of results
Very often an average is made of the different equipment powers taken from the record of the installation
operating data.
Hence it is good to have an electrician make a control measurement of the electric power of the motor of each
equipment.
The energy balance is calculated from the actual power consumptions (without taking into account the electrical
efficiency of the equipments).
A “process” consumption (kWh/t) is determined as well as a consumption of the mill itself which by far is the
equipment that utilizes the largest amount of energy in a finishing mill (80 to 95% in general).
IX - 3 -2 BB10 Test
The BB10 test was designed for clinker. The practical correlation giving the energy consumption vs the number
of revolutions has been done with finishing mills producing Portland cement or straight products (slag, ...).
It is estimated that for Type CEM I cement, the BB10 test is reliable within about 5%.
For Type CEM II cement and when the addition is limestone, there is a different behaviour of the addition fines
between production (ventilation sweeps the fines) and the test (no ventilation).
The same type of problem is encountered on pure products when high finenesses are obtained (BSS fineness >
4,000 cm2 / kg).
The phenomenon is the same with blended cement, i.e. an overgrinding of the fines that forms coating & thereby
reduced grinding efficiency.
In these 2 foregoing cases the curve is normal in the lower part but distorted in the high fineness range. It
becomes very steep.
When during production a grinding aid is used, it is difficult to maintain the same dosage in the BB10 because of
the small amount of material (1 kg).
For all these reasons, the grindability test error is about 10% with blended cement (with or without admixture) and
also for BSS finenesses below 3,000 - 3,500 cm2/g. Beyond that the interpretation is very uncertain.
With blended cement it is a good practice to run a BB10 test on the pure clinker.
By comparing with previous tests, it is possible to find out if the increase of the finishing mill kWh/t is due to a
change in clinker grindability (major ingredient).
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
75
X - CONCLUSION
The mill follow-up is very important because it helps in spotting a progressive drifting of the installation in terms of
flow or total electrical power.
The progressive drifting should be an incentive to try and determine the cause of a problem by means of airflow,
drying balances, etc.
The evolution of the grinding charges and the internal conditions of the equipment as well as any eventual
modifications should be analyzed.
In that perspective the follow-up becomes very important from an historical standpoint and help in determining the
causes of operation problems.
Grinding aids promote the disposal of the fines from the mill by preventing agglomeration.
Also, they have a beneficial effect on the material flow and in general will slightly increase the Blaine fineness for
equal strength.
☞ It is recommended, for each product, to look for the optimum dynamic separator recirculation
rate.
(This should be done when the grinding charge is suitable after sorting out the charge for example)
This consists of varying either the rejects and feed or elevator power requirements and identifying the requirement
at which maximum feed is obtained.
The feed is the fresh feed from the finishing mill and not the separator feed.
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
76
For satisfactory mill operations, follow-up and targeted actions are required without having to produce exhaustive
balances (refer to mill follow-up manual).
☞ Do a charge sorting out every 8000 h for compartment 1, 10000 h for compartments 2 and 3.
☞ Do a regular internal inspection of the mill (observations and if possible sampling of material to check
the evolution of the fineness). The grinding medium filling rate should be readjusted by adding balls.
☞ “Chase air inleakage” to insure a good mill ventilation (critical with drying mills).
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
77
- Pitot
- Distribution
- Rosin - Rammler
- RFCS (PCFR in French)
- Moisture (silicagel cartridges)
- Moisture (dry / humid) Available under excel 4 or 5 in Macintosh or
- Elevator flow Window version
- Drying / heat balance
- Charge characteristics
- Compartment 1 charge calculation
- Compartment 2 charge calculation
- Filling rate
- Smoke calculation
- Gas characteristics
- Pitot : Airflow calculation.
- Distribution curve : Calculation and plotting of the distribution curve (can be used also for the junction calculation
method).
- Rosin - Rammler: Calculation and plotting of the Rosin - Rammler curve.
- RFCS: Calculation and plotting of the RFCS curve.
- Moisture (silicagel cartridges): Calculation of gas moisture by pumping.
- Moisture (dry / humid): Calculation of gas moisture by dry and humid temperature measurements.
- Elevator flow: Calculation of the material flow from the elevator power draw and its characteristics.
- Drying / heat balance: Calculation of the drying and heat balances (several possible configurations. Maximum: 2
heat sources + furnace + 1 recirculation + 1 water spray).
- Charge characteristics: Calculation of the charge characteristics for each compartment with graphs and power
drawn by each compartment..
- Compartment 1 charge calculation: Calculation of compartment 1 charge plus large ball selected on the basis of
the material and mill characteristics.
- Compartment 2 charge calculation: Calculation of compartment 2 charge.
- Filling rate: Calculation of the compartment filling rate based on the measured height of the free space.
- Smoke calculation: Calculation of the combustion smokes and their analysis based on the solid fuel elementary
analysis.
- Gas characteristics: Calculations of the combustion smokes and their analysis based on the gas fuel elementary
analysis.
An outline, for all these calculation sheets, is given in the appendix.
A list (not complete) of equipment suppliers with price estimate is also given in the appendix together with the
characteristics of the balls and cylpebs vs their sizes.
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
78
LIST OF APPENDICES
Distribution curve
Rosin - Rammler
RFCS
Elevator flow
Charge characteristics
Filling rate
Smoke calculation
Gas characteristics
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
79
MILL FOLLOW-UP SEPARATOR INSPECTION REPORT
Type of separator : STURTEVANT
Plant : Mill :
Date : Type of cement :
3rd
Good Average Poor
G Cage bars condition
E Fixed blades condition
N
E Good Average Poor
R Liner wear condition
A
T
I Rejects valve in order
O out of order
N
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
80
LIST OF APPENDICES
Distribution curve
Rosin - Rammler
RFCS
Elevator flow
Charge characteristics
Filling rate
Smoke calculation
Gas characteristics
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
81
MILL FOLLOW-UP
MILL (2 COMPARTMENTS) INSPECTION REPORT
Plant : Mill :
Date : Type of cement :
MEASUREMENTS COMMENTS
Material level C1 Above* mm
Material Under*
C2 Above* mm
Under*
C1 Useful length M
Dimensions Useful diameter M
C2 Useful length M
Useful diameter M
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
82
LIST OF APPENDICES
Distribution curve
Rosin - Rammler
RFCS
Elevator flow
Charge characteristics
Filling rate
Smoke calculation
Gas characteristics
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
83
MILL FOLLOW-UP
MILL (3 COMPARTMENTS) INSPECTION REPORT
Plant : Mill :
Date : Type of cement :
MEASUREMENTS COMMENTS
Material level C1 Above* mm
Material Under*
C2 Above* mm
Under*
C3 Above* mm
Under*
C1 Useful length M
Dimensions Useful diameter M
C2 Useful length M
Useful diameter M
C3 Useful length M
Useful diameter M
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
84
C1 yes / no * yes / no *
C2 yes / no * yes / no *
C3 yes / no * yes / no *
* Strike out the non applicable mention
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
85
LIST OF APPENDICES
Distribution curve
Rosin - Rammler
RFCS
Elevator flow
Charge characteristics
Filling rate
Smoke calculation
Gas characteristics
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
86
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
87
LIST OF APPENDICES
Distribution curve
Rosin - Rammler
RFCS
Elevator flow
Charge characteristics
Filling rate
Smoke calculation
Gas characteristics
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
88
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
89
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
90
LIST OF APPENDICES
Distribution curve
Rosin - Rammler
RFCS
Elevator flow
Charge characteristics
Filling rate
Smoke calculation
Gas characteristics
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
91
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
92
LIST OF APPENDICES
Distribution curve
Rosin - Rammler
RFCS
Elevator flow
Charge characteristics
Filling rate
Smoke calculation
Gas characteristics
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
93
80.00 Feed
70.00 Rejects
60.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
1.00 10.00 100.00
Mesh (µm)
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
94
99.9
99.8
99.5
95
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
2
1
0.5
0.2
0.1
1 10 100 1000
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
95
LIST OF APPENDICES
Distribution curve
Rosin - Rammler
RFCS
Elevator flow
Charge characteristics
Filling rate
Smoke calculation
Gas characteristics
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
96
% passing
10 7.72 30.06 69.94
11 9.00 33.91 66.09 30.8
12 10.48 38.11 61.89
13 12.21 42.66 57.32 20
14 14.22 47.59 52.41
15 16.57 52.82 47.18 12.7
16 19.31 58.32 41.68
17 22.49 64.03 35.97 7.9
18 26.20 69.92 30.08
19 30.53 75.66 24.34 4.9
20 35.56 81.05 18.95
21 41.43 85.90 14.10 3
22 48.27 90.06 9.94
23 56.23 93.44 6.56 1.8
24 65.61 96.03 3.97
25 76.32 97.87 2.13 1.00 10.00 100.00
26 88.91 99.06 0.94 mesh (µm)
27 103.58 99.72 0.28
28
29
30
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
97
64 95.6 Designation
Correlation coefficient 0.9987 Designation
Designation
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
98
LIST OF APPENDICES
Distribution curve
Rosin - Rammler
RFCS
Elevator flow
Charge characteristics
Filling rate
Smoke calculation
Gas characteristics
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
99
RFCS CALCULATION
Plant: Product:
Mill: Date:
RFCS Curve
3
LOG RFCS (x)
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
-1.4 -1.2 -1.0 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 -0.0
LOG x
Regression line
RFCS 10 2.9
a=
b=
R2 =
1.190
2.845
0.967
LOG RFCS = a • Log
( ) x
1000
+b RFCS 45
RFCS 100
17.5
45.3
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
100
LIST OF APPENDICES
Distribution curve
Rosin - Rammler
RFCS
Elevator flow
Charge characteristics
Filling rate
Smoke calculation
Gas characteristics
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
101
PLANT :
MILL CIRCUIT:
MEASUREMENT POINT:
DATE :
TIME :
Input
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
102
LIST OF APPENDICES
Distribution curve
Rosin - Rammler
RFCS
Elevator flow
Charge characteristics
Filling rate
Smoke calculation
Gas characteristics
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
103
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
104
LIST OF APPENDICES
Distribution curve
Rosin - Rammler
RFCS
Elevator flow
Charge characteristics
Filling rate
Smoke calculation
Gas characteristics
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
105
Input
PLANT:
MILL:
DATE:
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
106
LIST OF APPENDICES
Distribution curve
Rosin - Rammler
RFCS
Elevator flow
Charge characteristics
Filling rate
Smoke calculation
Gas characteristics
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
107
Coal
% of trapped total dust 0 0
Milloutlet dry flow 19 19
Mill inlet temperature 12 12
Mill outlet temperature 56 56
% mill inlet water 9.4 9.4
% mill outlet water 0 0
Grindability (KWH/T) 42.9 42.9
% grinding energy transformed in cal 95 95
% volatile materials 25
Move to line 37
You can enter the detailed composition or indicate the kind of heat source
Air, fuel kiln gas (A/F/C/D)
Coal kiln gas or detail O2
N2 99
H2O
CO2
SO2
3
Flow (Nm /H)
Temperature
Source 1 dust - flow (kg / h dry)
- temperature
Move to line 53
You can enter the detailed composition or indicate the kind of heat source
Air, fuel kiln gas (A/F/C/D)
Coal kiln gas or detail O2
N2 99
H2O
CO2
SO2
3
Flow (Nm /H)
Temperature
Source 2 dust - flow (kg / h dry)
- temperature
Furnace
You can enter the detailed composition or simply indicate the kind of fuel
Normal NO2 LSC, FOD, Detail or gas (N/L/F/D/G) G Gas
IHC 11856 Cal/g 11856
Specific heat 99 0.3
Caution: % by mass H 24.6 24.6
C 74.9 74.9
S 0.0
O 0.0
N 0.5 0.5
H2O 0.0
Fuel flow 141.3 141
Furnace inlet fuel temperature 15 15
% furnace air excess 1013 1013
Aeraulic ratio
3
Nm of gas per kg of dry material 2.82 2.82
% gas flow for a 40% material flow 70 70
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
108
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
109
Theoretical drying efficiency (total inlet calories / kg of evaporation water) 1248 kcal/kg
useful drying efficiency (pure inlet calories / kg of evaporation water) 863 kcal/kg ∆ E - S/E = 0.94%
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
110
58%
Circuit outlet
Flow 31300 Nm3/h
Flow 8.7 Nm3/s
Flow 11.2 m3/s
100% Filter Temperature 80 °C
or cyclones % O2 (dry) 19.7 %
or both H2O amount 0.078 kg/Nm3
% H2O by volume 9.6 %
Cond. ratio 21 %
Mill outlet gas Dew point 46 °C
Flow 53650 Nm3/h Circuit outlet coal
Flow 14.9 Nm3/s Coal flow 19.0 t/h dry 42% Recirculation
Flow 19.3 m3/s Dust flow 0.0 t/h dry Flow 22350 Nm3/h
Temperature 80 °C Total flow 19.0 t/h dry Flow 6.2 Nm3/s
Aeraulic ratio 2.82 Nm3/kg Total flow 19.0 t/h humid Flow 8.0 m3/s
Temperature 56° C Temperature 8.0 °C
% H2O 0%
Coal No 1 Heat Source: none
Flow 21.0 t/h Exhaust dust flow 0.0 t/h dry Flow 0 Nm3/h
% H2O 9.4 % Flow Nm3/s
Dust 0.0 t/h Water spray Flow m3/s
Flow 0 l/h Temperature °C
Dew point °C
% O2 (dry) %
Coal
Mill Furnace : Gas
Comb. flow 141 Kg/h
Air excess 1013 %
Gas flow 21206 Nm3/h
Mill Gas flow 5.9 Nm3/s
Power draw 815 kw Mill Inlet Gas flow 11.4 m3/s
% wall losses 8 % Flow 43556 Nm3/h Temperature 256 °C
Flow 12.1 Nm3/s
Flow 19.4 m3/s No 2 Heat Source: none
Air inleakage Temperature 165 °C Flow 0 Nm3/h
Percentage 14 % outlets Flow Nm3/s
Percentage 18 % inlets Before Recirculation Flow m3/s
Flow 7641 Nm3/h Flow 21206 Nm3/h Temperature °C
Relative humidity 80 % Flow 5.9 Nm3/s Dew point °C
Temperature 4 °C Flow 11.4 m3/s % O2 (dry) %
Temperature 256 °C
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
111
No 1 Heat Source 0 kg/h → 0 Nm3/h
No 2 Heat Source 0 kg/h → 0 Nm3/h
Material 1971 kg/h → 2453 Nm3/h
Spray 0 kg/h → 0 Nm3/h
Total 2427 kg/h → 3020 Nm3/h
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
112
LIST OF APPENDICES
Distribution curve
Rosin - Rammler
RFCS
Elevator flow
Charge characteristics
Filling rate
Smoke calculation
Gas characteristics
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
113
GRINDING CHARGE
Plant
Mill
Charge 1993 / 94 Date
Rotating speed 20.0 tr/min
Compartment 1 Useful length 4.90 m Compartment 2 Useful length 6.04 m
Useful diameter 2.52 m Useful diameter 2.48 m
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
114
LIST OF APPENDICES
Distribution curve
Rosin - Rammler
RFCS
Elevator flow
Charge characteristics
Filling rate
Smoke calculation
Gas characteristics
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
115
Plant
Mill Input
Date
Bond Formula
Standard values
Feed grading, 20% retained 15,000 µm 18,000 µm 20,000 µm Clinker Raw Coal
Bond work index (W) 13.9 kWh/t 10.6 kWh/t 11.4 kWh/t Bond index 13.49 10.57 11.37
Useful mill diameter 3.65 m 3.65 m 3.65 m
Rotating speed 15.8 tr/min 15.8 tr/min 15.8 tr/min Standard values
% of critical speed 71.4 % 71.4 % 71.4 % Clinker Raw Coal
Material unit mass 3.09 t/m3 2.67 t/m3 1.63 t/m3 Unit mass 3.09 2.67 1.63
Bond Formula
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
116
LIST OF APPENDICES
Distribution curve
Rosin - Rammler
RFCS
Elevator flow
Charge characteristics
Filling rate
Smoke calculation
Gas characteristics
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
117
Developed surface at
end of compartment (m2/t) 35.17
(Balls < 25 mm)
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
118
LIST OF APPENDICES
Distribution curve
Rosin - Rammler
RFCS
Elevator flow
Charge characteristics
Filling rate
Smoke calculation
Gas characteristics
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
119
PLANT:
MILL:
DATE:
INPUT
COMPARTMENT 1
COMPARTMENT 2
COMPARTMENT 3
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
120
0.90
0.85 H
0.80
0.75
H/D
0.70
0.65
0.60
0.55
0.50
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Filling rate (%)
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
121
LIST OF APPENDICES
Distribution curve
Rosin - Rammler
RFCS
Elevator flow
Charge characteristics
Filling rate
Smoke calculation
Gas characteristics
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
122
SMOKE CALCULATIONS
Fuel No2 Fuel 2 Fuel 3
Carbon 85.90 % Neutral air 10.55546 Nm3/Kg of fuel Analysis of neutral smokes
3
Hydrogen 10.50 % Dry neutral S. 9.97154 Nm /Kg of fuel of fuel alone
3
Sulfur 3.00 % Humid neutral S. 11.14827 Nm /Kg of fuel % Dry Humid
Oxygen 0.36 % CO2 16.09 % 14.39 %
3
Nitrogen 0.24 % Tot. dry neut. S. 4,986 Nm /h SO2 0.21 % 0.19 %
Water Excess air 134.23 % N2 83.70 % 74.86 %
Ashes Total dry S. 11,678 Nm3/h H2O 0.00 % 10.56 %
3
Analysis 100 % Total humid S. 12,423 Nm /h Total 100.00 % 100.00 %
total
Fuel Q 0.50 T/H
% fuel 100.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 %
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
123
LIST OF APPENDICES
Distribution curve
Rosin - Rammler
RFCS
Elevator flow
Charge characteristics
Filling rate
Smoke calculation
Gas characteristics
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers
124
GAS CHARACTERISTICS
Gas Source Content Fuel consuming Total Total Density Heat capacity
La Malle 95/12 - Type “H” gas in capacity carbonic gas water vapor with respect superior inferior
to air SHC in kWh/m3 IHC in kWh/m3
Gas fuel composition m3/m3 Vair m3/m3 VCO2 m3/m3 VH2O m3/m3
Type of gas % A B A•B C A•C D A•D E A E F A•F G A•G
Hydrogen H2 0.000 2.36 0.000 0 0.000 1 0.000 0.0695 0.000 3.52 0.000 2.96 0.000
Carbon oxide CO 0.000 2.38 0.000 1 0.000 0 0.000 0.968 0.000 3.51 0.000 3.51 0.000
Methane CH4 97.30 0.973 9.54 9.282 1 0.973 2 1.946 0.555 0.540 11.08 10.781 9.97 9.701
Ethylene C2H4 0.000 14.4 0.000 2 0.000 2 0.000 0.976 0.000 17.65 0.000 16.53 0.000
Ethane C2H6 2.10 0.021 16.84 0.354 2 0.042 3 0.063 1.048 0.022 19.58 0.411 17.88 0.375
Propylene C3H6 0.000 21.84 0.000 3 0.000 3 0.000 1.480 0.000 26.06 0.000 24.34 0.000
Propane C3H8 0.20 0.002 24.37 0.049 3 0.006 4 0.008 1.557 0.003 28.22 0.056 25.94 0.052
Butylene C4H8 0.000 29.64 0.000 4 0.000 4 0.000 2.007 0.000 34.99 0.000 32.68 0.000
Butane C4H10 0.10 0.001 32.41 0.032 4 0.004 5 0.005 2.096 0.002 37.41 0.037 34.49 0.034
Pentane C5H12 0.000 40.87 0.000 5 0.000 6 0.000 2.671 0.000 47.11 0.000 43.52 0.000
Carbon dioxide CO2 0.000 0 0.000 1 0.000 0 0.000 1.529 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000
Nitrogen N2 0.30 0.003 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0.968 0.003 0 0.000 0 0.000
Oxygen O2 0.000 -4.77 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 1.105 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000
100.00 1.000 9.717 1.025 2.022 0.570 11.286 10.163
Input
Smoke capacity 0.79 Vair 7.677 m3/m3 Calculated heat capacity Vent mass
+ gas nitrogen 0.003 m3/m3 SHC 9706 kcal/Nm3 0.737 kg/Nm3
+ VCO2 1.025 m3/m3 IHC 8740 kcal/Nm3 Density / Air
Dry = V ds 8.70 m3/m3 IHC 11856 kcal/kg 0.570
+ VH2O 2.022 m3/m3 Proposed Heat capacity
Humid = V hs 10.73 m3/m3 SHC kcal/m3 at 15°C Note: m3/m3
Equals kcal/Nm3 is equivalent to
Smoke analysis Dry CO2 11.78 % Nm3/Nm3
(% volume) N2 88.22 %
Humid CO2 9.56 % Elementary weighted analysis
N2 71.59 % C H N O
H2O 18.85 % 74.44 24.47 0.51 0.00
Practical guide for the audit of grinding mills - 96/10 Department of Studies - Viviers