Professional Documents
Culture Documents
We are not changing the Government's actions much. We are just using
a nicer plan now. […] We should gain the land occupied by the Indians of
the South and West through a fair trade. It will be paid for by the
United States. We should send the Indians to a land where they may
live a long time. Perhaps their people will live there forever. There is no
doubt it will hurt them to leave the graves of their fathers. However,
is that different than what our ancestors did? […] Our forefathers
wanted to better their lives in an unknown land. To do that they were
willing to leave all the earthly objects they loved. […] Is it sad that our
children have left everything with which the young heart has become
wrapped up in? Far from it. It is rather a source of joy that our
country offers space where our young population may move freely
unconstrained in body or in mind. They can develop the power and
abilities of man in their most perfect way. These young people move
hundreds and almost thousands of miles. They pay for this move on
their own. They buy the lands they move onto. […] The Indian has
become unhappy in his ancient home. He has become unhappy because
of events the Government cannot control. Why is it cruel of the
Government then to buy the Indian's lands? The government will give
him a new and extensive territory, pay the cost of his removal, and
support him for a year in his new home.
HIPPO: Andrew Jackson’s Message to Congress “On
Indian Removal” (1830)
Point of View Read the questions to the left then read the
Did the author support or oppose the Indian document to answer the questions.
Removal Act (1830)?
What were his reasons for supporting or
opposing the new law?