Professional Documents
Culture Documents
BY "HLB"t
By Wx•,•,x• C. G•,•FFx•r
,/it/asPowderCompany,//Filmington,
Del.
other. The former is called the dis- emulsionformed. In our study and
persedphaseand'thelatter is called use of emulsifiers,it appearsthat
the continuous phase. Industry the action of emulsifiersmay be
demands further that an emulsion relatedto their structureroughlyas
must exhibit a certain stability follows:
under a variety of conditions. First, "what the emulsifieror sur-
Emulsifiers and stabilizers are face-activeagentswill do," that is,
addedto attain the desiredstability. make an O/W or W/O emulsion,
Between the two phasesof an act as a detergent,or solubilizean
emulsion, a large area or interface oil, or have someother action, seems
exists which surroundseach parti- to dependon what we call the HLB
cle. The adsorptionof emulsifiers of the emulsifier. This value is an
at the emulsion interface has been expression
of the relativesimultane-
established. The nature of this ous attraction of an emulsifier for
interface, whether mono- or multi- water and for oil (or for the two
molecular in thickness,is still in phasesof a systemto be emulsified).
questionaspointedout by Schwartz Emulsifiers consist of a molecule
and Perry (5) in their new book. that combines
both hydrophilicand
Sincethe particlesof an emulsion lipophilic groups and it is the bal-
are considerablylarger than molecu- anceof the sizeand strengthof these
lar in size, we may considerthe in- two opposinggroups that we call
terfacethat surroundseachparticle HLB. For purposes of convenience,
as being similar to the interface the effectivebalanceof thesegroups
which separatesthe phaseswhen is assigneda numericalvalue.
present in bulk. If we were to Second,howefficientlythe emulsi-
shake mineral oil with water we ob- fier will work s•ems to be related to
tain an emulsion that will break over-all chemical structure, that is,
quickly into its two phases. Ex- whether the emulsifieris a soap, a
amination of the interface would re-
partial ester, a complete ester,
veal that the interfacial tension is
whetherthe lipophilicgroupis satu-
high, approximately45 dynes/cm. rated, and so forth. This latter ac-
With the addition of an emulsifier of tion appears to be quite specific
suitable type this would drop to al- and no "rules" have been estab-
most zero. This reduction in inter- lished.
facial tension primarily assistsin
forming the emulsionthoughit also DEVELOPMENT OF HLB SYSTEM
promotesstability.
As mentioned above, the assist- In our presentsystem,an emulsi-
ance in emulsion formation and
fier that is lipophilicin characteris
subsequentstabilization appearsto assigneda low HLB numberand an
be only part of the action of an emulsifier that is hydrophilic in
emulsifier. In addition, the emulsi- characteris assigned a high number.
fier usually establishesthe type of The midpoint is approximatelyten
CLASSIFICATION OF SURFACE-ACTIVE AGENTS 313
and the assignedvalueshave ranged one direction than the other. This
from one to forty. When two or would seem to decide the type of
more emulsifiers are combined or emulsion that is formed--whether
blended,the HLB values are addi- O/W or W/O. Presumably,the be-
tive in behavior. Thus, if we blend havior of an emulsion could be ex-
threepartsof emulsifier"A" having pressed by observing the proper
an HLB of 8 and one part of an characteristics of this interface.
emulsifier"B" having an HLB of It occurred to us that the "bend-
16, the resultingHLB of the blend ing" tendencyof the interfacemight
willbethesumof three-quarters of be observedby determining the in-
8 andone-quarterof 16, i.e. (6 4- 4) terfacial tension in different direc-
or 10. tions (i.e., up and down), from one
We should note that chemical phase to the other and vice versa.
hydro- A literature search revealed that
typealonedoesnot establish
balance.Thus,soaps Roberts (4) had already made a
phile-lipophile
may.range fromstronglyhydrophilic brief study of this effect in relation
for sodiumlaurate to strongly lipo- to natural petroleumemulsions. In
philic for aluminumoleate; esters, his work, differencesin interfacial
ether-esters,and ethers may range tension were observed whether the
from low to high HLB's, sulfates duNouy ring was pulled up or
and sulfonates may range from pusheddown throughthe interface.
mediumto high. However, the existenceof a differ-
HLB is not the sameassolubility, ence in interfacial tensionis ques-
thoughthereis an over-allrelation- tioned since interfacial tension is in
ship. Thus, materialshaving low itselfthe differencein free energiesof
values tend to be oil soluble and the two phases. It is possiblethat
materials having high values tend the observed differences are due to
to be.water soluble. However, two the introduction of a third phase,
emulsifiers may have the sameHLB the platinum ring. Whether or not
andexhibitdifferentsolubilitychar- this is true, with efficientemulsifier
acteristics. systems,observationsare most dif-
In the preparation of an emul- ficult because,by their very nature,
sion, the reduction of interfacial these systems have an interfacial
tensionmakes it easier to disperse tensionof almost zero (sincethey
oneof the phasesin the other. The form emulsionsspontaneously)and
nature of the interface established thereforethe precisionof measure-
by the adsorptionof the emulsifier ment is low. Hence, this phaseof
at the interface in some •manner the study was not considered
influencesthe two immiscibleliquids further.
to such an extent that one breaks Other experimentalmeansof esti-
up into dropletswhile the otherre- mating HLB have been considered.
tains its continuity. The interface Lambert and Busse (2) recently
apparently"bends"moreeasilyin publisheda rapid methodof deter-
314 JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF COSMETIC CHEMISTS
mining the "dye solubilization"ef- tiers most often used as O/W emul-
ficiencyof surface-activeagentsas sifiers had assigned HLB values
previouslydescribedby McBain (3). within the range of about nine to
A comparisonof our estimatedHLB twelve. The values of our surface-
values and some of the data pub- active agents used for other pur-
lishedby Lambert and Busseis most poses were then correlated, with
interesting. In their derivation of the results shown in Table 2. After
an equation for a solubilizingiso-
therm, n and K are constantswhich TABLE 2
TAsLe 3
Material Trade Mark Manufacturer or Distributor
with the water. After a few minutes hours due to the poor quality of
the emulsion was reshaken and then of emulsions in an entire series.
storedovernight. Storagewas again Sincethe data are comparativethis
either at room temperaturefor oils is consideredpermissible when an
or at 60-70øC. for waxes. Observa- entire series is handled as a unit.
tions (and pictures) were usually O/W or W/O emulsionsmay result
taken after twenty-four hours. and this behavior must be checked.
Further storage appeared to affect Usually the differenceis readilyap-
results little. In a few cases the ob- parent,in fact is expecteddepending
servations were taken before 24 upon the HLB of the emulsifiers.
. .
hibit high HLB's, higher than re- total amountof fatty acid and a re-
quired for optimum emulsification. ductionof the amount of soap.
However, soap alone is seldom, if Goodey (1) has studied the be-
ever, the sole emulsifier in a for- havior of emulsifiers and has ex-
mula. Weknowthatsoaps hydrolyze, plained,in part, their actionby de-
and the true emulsifieris a mixture, fining a part of the emulsifieras a
or blend,of soapand freefatty acid. coupler. This is not couplingaction
This is illustrated in Fig. 4: where as the word is generally used (the
the sampleswith the arrowsare the addition of an agent to promote
theoreticallyneutralizedsoaps,but clarity of solutionof a concentrate
in eachinstance,the samplesto the or emulsion). He suggests that
left in which there is excessfatty there are four constituents of an
'acid are the better emulsions. O/W emulsion: oil, water, emulsi-
The emulsifier,so-called,in these fier, and coupler. In his explana-
series ranges from all fatty acid tion, the emulsifieris alwaysa highly
at the left to all base at the right. hydrophilic substance and the
This might be consideredas repre- coupler is always oil-soluble. The
senting increasingHLB from left couplingaction of which he speaks
to right, thoughit is only true to a is promotion of solubility of the
point slightly to the right of the emulsifierin the oil phaseto further
theoreticalsoap. At this point suf- the reduction of interfacial tension
ficient base has been added to mini- and improve emulsification. We
mize hydrolysisof the soap. Any prefer to considerall of this action
higher ratio of base to fatty acid under the term emulsification and
merely resultsin a reductionof the to call both components emulsifiers.
320 JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF COSMETIC CHEMISTS
SampleNo. I • 3 4 5
Row 1
Oil 60 50 40 25 10
Water 34.3 45.0 55.8 71.9 88.05
Span20 HLB 8.6 4.5 3.8 3.0 1.9 0.75
Tween 20 HLB 16.7 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2
Row 2
Oil 60 50 40 25 10
Water 34.0 45.0 56.0 72.5 89.00
Span20 HLB 8.6 4.5 3.8 3.0 1.9 0.75
Tween 20 HLB 16.7 1.5 1.2 1.0 0.6 0.25
Row 3
Oil 60 50 40 25 10
Water 34.5 45.0 55.5 71.2 87.0
Span40 HLB 6.7 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.3 0.5
Tween 40 HLB 15.6 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5
Row 4
Oil 60 50 40 25 10
Water 34.0 45.0 56.0 72.4 89.0
Span40 HLB 6.7 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.3 0.5
Tween 40 HLB 15.6 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.3 0.5
CLASSIFICATION OF SURFACE-ACTIVE AGENTS 321
PERCENTAGE OF "•B"
0 S I0 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 •0 85 90 95 I00
27
ATLAS HLB COMPUTOGRAPH 27
FOR COMBINATIONS OF SURFACE ACTIVE AGENTS
26 26
25 -- 25
24 24
2• 2•
22 • 22.•
2l 21"
2O 20 0
19 19 ../
<{lB 18
O 16 -- 16
• ,40
...I 15 15-TW[EN•0
14 14
13 -TWœEN
21
12 12
II I-TWEEN •5
65
9
SPAN 20 --
10 -
-- J. IO-'TWEEN
,
BI
7 •-- 7
SPAN '-- -
6
SPAN 62 -- -
5 5
SPAN, -- -
SPAN 4 4
SPAN 65-
_-2: - z
SPAN
I
0 0
0 .5 I0 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 8,0 65 90 95 100
PERCENTAGE OF "B"
SPAN• TWF...œN:
RE.•. U.S. PAT. OFF,
T. BL• 6
RequiredHLB for
o/w w/o
Oil or Wax Emulsion Emulsion
Cottonseed Oil
Carbontetrachloride
ParafFin(household) . 9
Microcrystallinewax (MicropacQ, S-V) 9.5*
MineralOil, White, light (MarcolGX) io
MineralOil, White, heavy(Nujol) Io.5
Mineral Seal Oil Io.5'
Petrolatum,white (White Perrecta) xo.5
SiliconeOil (G. E.) Io.5'
Kerosene
Naphtha I3'
ßCetyl Alcohol I3
Orthodichlorobenzene
•' i3'
Beeswax,white io-i6
Carnauba Wax I4.5'
Candelilla Wax i4.5'
Lanolin,U.S. P., anhyd. I5
Dimethyl Phthalate i5'
Orthophenylphenol
Stearic Acid 17
* Tentative.
•' Plussmallamounts(3-5%) of pineoil andisopropylalcohol.
The best ratio in this seriesis 45% fected by the type and amount of
Span60 and 55% Tween60 at a polyol.
calculated HLB of 10.3. The dividing line between in-
The evaluation of different chemi- gredients and emulsifie•:sis often
cal typesof emulsifiersis then con- not clear. Stearic acid, lanolin,
sidered as previously mentioned. cholesterol,and beeswax are just
For thisexample,the stearateblend a few examplesof materials that
is the best chemicaltype. Usually may servea dual role. An example
it will be desirable to cover a much of this is in soap-emulsified-facial-
wider range of alternate chemical creams in which the stearic acid is
typesthan the spacelimitationper- partially neutralized. In this, the
mitted us in the third row of Fig. 6. stearic acid forms a bulk of the oil
It must be remembered that all phase, but portions of the stearic
blends must be at the correct acid are present as emulsifier,both
HLB. neutralizedand as free acid. By
It is interestingto note that the examining a system, it is usually
addition of polyol to the aqueous possibleto evaluateeachingredient
phaseof an emulsionsuch as was in the terms of its uses.
just studieddoesnot appearto alter
APPLICATIONS OTHER THAN EMUL-
the HLB appreciably. The samples
SI FICATION
in the top row of Fig. 7 show the
effectof adding various amountsof (1) Atntifoaming
commercialsorbitolsirup. The per- Antifoaming is quite a specific
centagesare the amount of Adex* action, therefore it is surprising
in the total formula, not the amount when most of the Atlas agentsthat
in the aqueousphase. Therefore, have found success as antifoam
for the fourth samplethe aqueous agentsfall in the rangeof 1.5-3 and
phasecontainsapproximately40% all are less than 8. No complete
polyolwhichis a sizableproportion. studyof thissubject,aswith emulsi-
In the secondrow, three different fiers, has been made or is contem-
polyols are employed. Little dif- plated.
ference is noted in the emulsifica-
tion,regardless of the type of polyol (2) PI"ettingand Spreading
used. This doesnot imply that the Atlas wetting and spreading
three polyolswill producesimilar agentsfall in the rathernarrowHLB
cosmetic effects. These differences rangeof 7 to 9. We havefrequently
are well known and are due to the tried productsoutside this range,
variations in hygroscopicities, co- but with little success,particularly
solubilities,and otherphysicalprop- when the values were greater than
erties of the polyols themselves. 9. Wetting is usually desiredin an
The dataindicatethat at the proper aqueous solution, suspension,or
balanceof emulsifier,the emulsifi- O/W emulsion,and this is probably
cation will not be appreciably the cause of the narrow effective
326 JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF COSMETIC CHEMISTS