1. Advisory Opinion on the Use of Nuclear Weapon 1996 8.

Russian Socialist Federated Social republic vs Cibrario

 There is no source of law, customary or treaty, that explicitly 
prohibits the possession or even use of nuclear weapons. The only 9. Banco Nacional de Cuba vs Sabatino
requirement being that their use must be in conformity with the law 
on self-defence and principles of international humanitarian law.[ 10. Oetjen vs Central Leather Co.
 A threat or use of force by means of nuclear weapons that is 
contrary to Article 2, paragraph 4, of the United Nations Charter and 11. Yao vs Commission on Immigration
that fails to meet all the requirements of Article 51, is unlawful" 
 "A threat or use of nuclear weapons should also be compatible with 12. US (Alexander Tellech) vs Austria and Hungary
the requirements of the international law applicable in armed

conflict, particularly those of the principles and rules of humanitarian
13. The Canevaro Case
law, as well as with specific obligations under treaties and other

undertakings which expressly deal with nuclear weapons"
14. The Nottebohm Case
 "the threat or use of nuclear weapons would generally be contrary to

the rules of international law applicable in armed conflict, and in
particular the principles and rules of humanitarian law; However, in 15. Chattin Case
view of the current state of international law, and of the elements of 
fact at its disposal, the Court cannot conclude definitively whether 16. US (Noyes) vs Panama
the threat or use of nuclear weapons would be lawful or unlawful in 
an extreme circumstance of self-defence, in which the very survival 17. North American Dredging Co. vs Mexico
of a State would be at stake] 
 "There exists an obligation to pursue in good faith and bring to a 18. Harvey vs Santiago
conclusion negotiations leading to nuclear disarmament in all its 
aspects under strict and effective international control 19. US vs Rauscher
2. Reparation Case (ICJ Advisory Opinion 1949) 
 20. Secretary of Justice vs Lantion
3. International Catholic Migration Commission vs Calleja 

4. Kapisanan ng mga Manggagawa vs The International Rice
Research Institute

5. DFA vs NLRB

6. WHO vs Aquino

7. Jeffrey Liang vs People
