1. Acién P. ș.a.

The female gubernaculum: role in the embryology and development of the

genital tract and in the possible genesis of malformations. In: Eur J Obstet Gynecol
Reprod Biol. 2011, vol.159, nr.2, p.426-432.
2. Ahmadi F, Haghighi H. Detection of congenital mullerian anomalies using real-time 3D
sonography. In: Int J Fertil Steril. 2011, vol.5, nr.2, p.119.
3. Ahmadi F. ș.a. Application of 3D ultrasonography in detection of uterine abnormalities.
In: Int J Fertil Steril. 2011, vol.4, nr.4, p.144-147.
4. Ata B. ș.a. Do measurements of uterine septum using three-dimensional ultrasound and
magnetic resonance imaging agree? In: J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2014, vol.36, nr.4, p.331-
338.
5. Bocca SM. ș.a. A study of the cost, accuracy, and benefits of 3-dimensional sonography
compared with hysterosalpingography in women with uterine abnormalities. In: J
Ultrasound Med. 2012, vol.31, nr.1, p.81-85.
6. Botros R. M. B. Rizk, University of South Alabama, Ultrasonography in Reproductive
Medicine and Infertility, 2010.
7. Buttram VC Jr, Gibbons WE. Müllerian anomalies: a proposed classification. (An
analysis of 144 cases). In: Fertil Steril. 1979, vol.32, nr.1, p.40-46.
8. Constatin Enescu , Embriologie specială, Organogeneza, Malformații - 2011 (Special
Embriology, Organogenesis, Malformations), vol.II , pag. 225.
9. Detti L. Ultrasound assessment of uterine cavity remodeling after surgical correction of
subseptations. In: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014, vol.210, nr.3, p.262.e1-6.

10. Deutch T, Bocca S, Oehninger S, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging versus three-
dimensional transvaginal ultrasound for the diagnosis of Müllerian anomalies. Fertil
Steril 2006; 86: S308.
11. Faivre E1, Fernandez H, Deffieux X, Gervaise A, Frydman R, Levaillant JM. Accuracy of
three-dimensional ultrasonography in differential diagnosis of septate and
bicornuate uterus compared with office hysteroscopy and pelvic magnetic
resonance imaging J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2012 Jan-Feb;19(1):101-6. doi:
10.1016/j.jmig.2011.08.724. Epub 2011 Oct 20.
12. Fedele L , Dorta M , Vercellini P , Brioschi D , Candiani GB Ultrasound in the diagnosis
of subclasses of unicornuate uterus. Obstetrics and Gynecology [01 Feb 1988, 71(2):274-
277]
13. Ghi T. s.o. Accuracy of three-dimensional ultrasound in diagnosis and classification of
congenital uterine anomalies. In: Fertil Steril. 2009, vol.92, nr.2, p.808-813.

14. Graupera B, Pascual MA, Hereter L, Browne JL, Úbeda B, Rodríguez I, Pedrero C
Accuracy of three-dimensional ultrasound compared with magnetic resonance imaging in
diagnosis of Müllerian duct anomalies using ESHRE-ESGE consensus on the
classification of congenital anomalies of the female genital tract Ultrasound Obstet
Gynecol. 2015 Nov;46(5):616-22. doi: 10.1002/uog.14825. Epub 2015 Oct 5
15. Grimbizis GF. S.o. Female genital tract congenital malformations (classifications,
diagnosis and management). Springer. London-Heidelberg-New York. 2015. 318p.
16. Johansson HKL, Svingen T, Fowler PA, Vinggaard AM, Boberg J. Environmental
influences on ovarian dysgenesis-developmental windows sensitive to chemical
exposures. In: Nat Rev Endocrinol 2017 Jul; 13(7): 400-414
17. Jurkovic D, Geipel A, Gruboeck K, Jauniaux E, Natucci M, Campbell S. Three-
dimensional ultrasound for the assessment of uterine anatomy and detection of congenital
anomalies: a comparison with hysterosalpingography and two-dimensional
sonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1995; 5: 233–237.
18. Kaufman RH, Adam E, Binder GL, Gerthoffer E. Upper genital tract changes and
pregnancy outcome in offspring exposed in utero to diethylstilbestrol. Am J Obstet
Gynecol 1980;137(3):299–308.
19. Kaveh M, Mehdizadeh Kashi A, Sadegi K, Forghani F.Int J Fertil Steril. 2018 Jan; 11(4):318-320.
Epub 2017 Oct 12.

20. Khaled Abd AlWahabAbo Dewana,Dina Gamal ElDeinElKholy Septate or bicornuate

uterus: Accuracy of three-dimensional trans-vaginal ultrasonography and pelvic magnetic
resonance imaging Volume 45, Issue 3, September 2014, Pages 987-995.

21. Kougioumtsidou A, Mikos T, Grimbizis GF, Karavida A, Theodoridis TD, Sotiriadis

A, Tarlatzis BC, Athanasiadis AP Three-dimensional ultrasound in the diagnosis and the
classification of congenital uterine anomalies using the ESHRE/ESGE classification: a
diagnostic accuracy study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019 Mar;299(3):779-789. doi:
10.1007/s00404-019-05050-x. Epub 2019 Jan 19.
22. Kupesic S Clinical implications of sonographic detection of uterine anomalies for
reproductive outcome Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Oct;18(4):387-400.
23. Kupesic S, Kurjak A, Skenderovic S, Bjloes D. Screening for uterine abnormalities by
three-dimensional ultrasound improves perinatal outcome. J Perinat Med 2002; 30: 9–17
24. Liana Pleş,Cătălina Alexandrescu,Cringu Antoniu Ionescu,Cristian Andrei
Arvătescu, Simona Vladareanu, Marius Alexandru Moga, Three-dimensional scan of the
uterine cavity of infertile women before assisted reproductive technology use Medicine
(Baltimore). 2018 Oct; 97(41): e12764.
25. Ludwin A. ș.a. Diagnostic accuracy of sonohysterography, hysterosalpingography and
diagnostic hysteroscopy in diagnosis of arcuate, septate and bicornuate uterus. In: J
Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2011, vol.37, nr.3, p.178-186.
26. Moini A. s.o. Accuracy of 3-dimensional sonography for diagnosis and classification of
congenital uterine anomalies. In: J Ultrasound Med. 2013, vol.32, nr.6, p.923-927.
27. Puttabyatappa M, Padmanabhan V. Developmental Programming of Ovarian Functions
and Dysfunctions. In: Vitam Horm. 2018; 107:377-422.
28. Raga F. s.o. Reproductive impact of congenital Müllerian anomalies. In: Hum Reprod.
1997, vol.12, nr.10, p.2277-2281.
29. Reichman D, Laufer MR, Robinson BK. Pregnancy outcomes in unicornuate uteri: a
review. In: Fertil Steril. 2009, vol.91, nr.5, p.1886-1894

30. Saleem SN. MR imaging diagnosis of uterovaginal anomalies: current state of the
art. Radiographics 2003; 23: e13.
31. The American Fertility Society classifications of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal
occlusion, tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, müllerian
anomalies and intrauterine adhesions. In: Fertil Steril. 1988, vol.49, nr.6, p.944-955.
32. Yoo RE. s.o. Magnetic resonance evaluation of Müllerian remnants in
MayerRokitanskyKüster-Hauser syndrome. In: Korean J Radiol. 2013, vol.14, nr.2,
p.233-239.