Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1. The increased use of drones for civilian applications has presented with
regulatory challenges. Such challenges include the need to ensure that drones are
operated safely, without harming public and national security, and should protect areas
of national, historical, or natural importance. India has often found itself at the back
foot playing regulatory catch up with emerging technologies went from effectively
banning drones or Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) outright to embracing them in
less than 3 years by formulating a comprehensive regulatory framework in form of
CAR.
3. Definitions. Some of the commonly used definitions are listed as per CAR are
listed below: -
(a) Command and Control (C2) Link. CAR defines C2 link as data link
between the UA and the remote pilot station for the purpose of managing the
flight.
(f) Owner. A natural or legal person who owns a remotely piloted aircraft
and its remote pilot station.
(h) Prohibited Area. Airspace of defined dimensions, above the land areas
or territorial waters of India within which the flights are not permitted at any time
under any circumstances.
(j) Remote Pilot. A person charged by the operator with duties essential to
the operation of a remotely piloted aircraft and who manipulates the flight
controls, as appropriate, during flight time.
(k) Remote Pilot Station (RPS). The component of remotely piloted aircraft
system containing the equipment used to pilot the remotely piloted aircraft.
(m) Remotely Piloted Aircraft System (RPAS). A remotely piloted aircraft, its
associated remote pilot station(s), the required command and control links and
any other components, as specified in the type design.
(n) Restricted Area. Airspace of defined dimensions above the land areas
or territorial waters of India within which the flight of aircraft is restricted.
(b) Micro : Greater than 250 grams and less than or equal to 2 kg.
(d) Medium : Greater than 25 kg and less than or equal to 150 kg.
(a) Nano RPA operating below 50 feet (15 m) AGL in uncontrolled airspace/
enclosed premises.
(b) Micro RPA operating below 200 feet (60 m) AGL in uncontrolled
airspace/ enclosed premises. However, the user shall intimate to local police
office 24 hours prior to conduct of actual operations.
(c) RPA owned and operated by NTRO, ARC and Central Intelligence
Agencies are also exempted from obtaining UAOP. However, the agency shall
intimate local police office and concerned ATS Units prior to conduct of actual
operations.
6. All RPA (except for Nano category intending to operate up to 50 ft (15 m) AGL
in uncontrolled airspace/ enclosed premises), shall be equipped with the following
serviceable components/ equipment:
(d) RFID and GSM SIM Card/ NPNT compliant for APP based real time
tracking.
(e) Fire resistant identification plate inscribed with UIN.
7. In addition to the equipment required above all RPA (except Nano and Micro
category operating in uncontrolled airspace) intending to operate in controlled airspace
up to 400 feet (120 m) AGL shall be equipped with the following additional
equipment/capabilities:
9. The tracking system of the RPA shall be self-powered and tamper/ spoofing
proof to ensure data relay even in the event of RPA accident.
10. Indian Air Force shall monitor RPA movements in the country in coordination
with Airports Authority of India.
11. Operating Restrictions. As per the rules, if you are flying Nano-drones
(<250 gm) for recreational purposes only, you don’t need any permission, however, if
your drone is classified under Mini and above categories (>2Kg), you will need several
permissions including permissions from police, flight path authorization, and more.
Apart from these permissions, a user also needs to keep in mind that certain sensitive
areas are restricted, and drones are not allowed in such areas listed below:
(f) Beyond 500 m (horizontal) into sea from coast line provided the location
of ground station is on fixed platform over land.
12. No RPA shall carry out aerial photography/remote sensing survey. However,
DGCA may authorize such operations on case-to-case basis subject to approval of
MoD.
13. Policy Gaps. While the DGCA has taken the first step of framing draft
guidelines for the use of UAVs, there remain several gaps that must be addressed,
keeping in mind the need for balance between security concerns and legitimate uses
of drones in a variety of civilian sectors. The policy doesn’t have any quality control
and few other policy gaps listed below
(a) Quality control. the most striking absence in the regulations is that
of import standardisation. As a sizable percentage of India’s drones continue to
be imported, there is a need to ensure their quality control and standardisation.
(c) The legal liability for a drone comes under question as it is difficult to
ascertain whether the device malfunctioned or if it was incorrectly handled or
operated in the absence of any guidelines. There is also the heightened risk of
air accidents due to malfunctioning of drones
(f) Privacy becomes an intricate problem with use of UAV. The Indian
government has so far made no attempt to address concerns of privacy
infringement by drones.
(g) A hovering UAV can be used to record sound from a room even at
normal conversational levels and It can also be used as a network jammer to
block wireless communication in an area.
(h) As of now there is no single window clearance and the user has to obtain
clearance from various agencies.
(i) Unlike many other country CAR doesn’t make it mandatory for UAV to
have Voice and Data recorder on board (for RPA >150 kg).
14. Laws in various countries. Out of around 200 countries about 45 countries had
passed drone laws till Feb 19. And almost 69 of the countries are in process of
formulating the regulations including Canada, Japan. There are 71 countries that still
have no drone laws at all and are also not yet started the formulation process. 15
countries have banned the use of drones completely (Algeria, Barbados, Brunei, Cote
d’Ivoire, Cuba, Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Madagascar, Morocco, Nicaragua,
Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Syria).
LIST OF IDENTIFIED AREA FOR TESTING/ DEMONSTRATION OF RPAS
The above list of Identified Area for Operation of RPAS excludes the restricted areas
notified by various Government agencies.