Way of Life Philippines: Advantages and

Disadvantages of Federalism
Enrique B. Picardal Jr
Naval State University, Naval Biliran
ekyjr26@gmail.com
09093658023

Introduction

We do not need to open our Constitution. We do not need to change our 1987 Constitution.
I am convinced that the proposed highest-ranking government officials do this, as we often; we
simply eliminate one of the most powerful arguments in favor of Federalism. Federalists'
teaching that for decades the federal-provincial- emergency issues as evidence that Mindanao
freedom is threatened and that federalism cannot be changed.

Nationalism can be a destructive force when it promotes discrimination and division. But it can
also be a force for good when it is intended to protect local independence against homogenizing
forces yet large entities.
The federal spending power, eliminate federal programs with the destruction of power, and to
move the taxpayers of the province is the right thing to do from some perspective about it

First: these are the natural things to do

A basic Act is not intended to be a flexible arrangement that changes from one decade to another
depending on political self-esteem. This is what allows the violations of the Constitution- law, the
whole moral foundation of our political system is to participate in its core.

1
Second: this is the federalist thing to do.

Twenty-four countries in 193 countries are a federal political set-up.

Looking at Earth in political history, it can be said that there are two advantages and federalism
costs. Read the following article for a broad and profound analysis of federalism.
Solving this problem is that it is Conservative in things to do. I'm in a Neutral side and I look at
the edge of the Conservative that I believe is a big and interventionist, centralized government.
But in small and limited governments, the government is close to people as much as possible.
For all these reasons, I believe that this proposal should be brought back to the faces of our
political debates. And stay there until we are able to enforce them. When we are successful, it
can be restored to our federal unity with its former exaltation and has helped the United
Kingdom create the 21st century through Life.

Federalism is a political power system divided by any central government and many regional
governments. In a written constitution to propose the sharing of powers and agreements between
the state and the units claimed to be the provincial or regional government with the power to
exercise independence, except in some areas of management. For example in America, local
governments are the absolute authority of issuing licenses, providing for public health,
conducting elections and local governments, to look after the trade direction, and so on twenty-
four countries in 193 countries have a federal political set-up.
Looking at the World in political history, it can be said that there are two advantages and
federalism costs. Read the following article for a broad and profound analysis of federalism.

Solving this problem is that it is the conservative thing to do. I have a Neutral side and see me on
the edge of the Conservative I believe is a good and intervention, centralized government. But in
the small and limited government, the government is close to people as much as possible. For all
these reasons, I believe that this proposal should be brought back in front of our political debate.
And stay there until we are able to implement they are. If we are successful, this has been
restored to our federal unions in its former exaltation and has helped the United Kingdom create
the 21st century through Life.
2
Federalism is a political power system divided into any central government and many regional
governments. In a written constitution suggesting the sharing of power and agreements between
the state and the units that have been claimed that the provincial or regional government has the
power to use independently in certain areas of management. For example in America, local
governments have full authority over the issue of licenses, provide for public health, to conduct
elections and create a local government, to look after the direction of trade, and so on.

Federalism of the World Today

Today, Federalism is studied not only in the first country like the USA, Australia, and Canada but
also in developing countries such as Mexico, India, and Brazil. I think of a change in
governments set in countries, in some countries such as Sri Lanka and the Philippines nowadays
trending because of the planned of the President Duterti to have a Federalism form of
Government for the reason accordingly for peaceful Mindanao, sadly, this idea must be brought
to inform cordially to the people if all willing to accept this kind of government, Filipino’s are
well looked after in the benefits, costs and unexpected conclusion of Federalism.

3
Advantages of Federalism

Every province has political, social and economic problems unique to the region itself.
Provincial government representatives live close to people and the most important of the time
from the same community, so they are in a more good position to understand the problems and
offer unique solutions for them. For example, traffic in the Philippines, Hawaii is a problem that
is best resolved by local governments, keeping local factors ideally, rather than by someone
living in New York. Federalism offers them the place where regional government measures.

As the rules of the framework, local needs preferences and opinions due to government
considerations. Rights of states of minorities are also protected. For example, in states like
Arizona where there is a large Hispanic population and therefore, a large number of schools
provide bilingual education. The State government has the freedom to adopt policies that cannot
be followed nationwide or by any other state. For example, two sex marriages are not
recognized by the federal government of the United States but they are provided with legal status
within the states of Connecticut, Iowa, Vermont, and Massachusetts. The division of employment
between central and regional governments led to the highest use of wealth.

The central government can think deeply about international affairs and protect the country as
the provincial government to deliver local needs Federalism is a room for the representation of
the different populations. Citizens of the ib Different provinces can have different preferences,
grandchildren, and the following cultures. The central government can look at differences and
adopt policies that serve the majority. Innovations and experiments.

Two local governments can have two different strategies to bring reform to any public domain
area, whether it be taxes or education. Comparison of the results of the policies can provide a
clear the idea of where the rules are better and therefore, can be adopted in the future.
Federalism is undoubtedly the many positive Vis a Vis Communism or foreign dialects but even
some political scientists tend to raise the questions about the benefits of federalism.

4
Disadvantages in Federalism

Share the power of the Center and the union with the two pros and cons of the federation.
Sometimes there may be job-displacement and subsequent confusion as to who is responsible for
what. For example, when the hurricane Katrina earned in New Orleans, USA, in 2005, with no
job rescue delay as there was a disagreement between the state and the federal government
responsible for managing disaster work. This would result in the loss of many lives. The federal
government system is very expensive as more people are chosen in the office, in the state and the
centers, than in the requirements. Therefore, it is usually said that only the rich countries can
achieve it. Many more delegates of paper overflow can also lead to decay. Federalism can lead
to unnecessary competition between different regions. Maybe a rebellion by a regional
government against the national government. Two situations posed a threat to the nation's
integrity.

Drawbacks. Well, this is the same political reality, the existence of hundreds, if not thousands of
villages, or political unit pieces have become the basis of the opinion that the Philippine State,
before weakening such forces represented by the sultanates, the rich, and the tribal leaders
though in the Cordillera or in Mindanao, and others, with the possibility of pulling support from
people the Manila government also mentioned the support perspective. The signature to go if the
State is weak, why would they reduce further by proposing a federal setup? The second common
argument that seems to hinder the transition to federalism is to do with the monarchial system
beneath Spain. The Governor-General, who is a government entity in Spain during the colony,
representing a strong central the Philippine government, in the minds of many, the country holds
together for centuries. Then, ask them: "why change is like an accurate system today"?
Federalism constitutes a regional identity of the whole. Natural resources, industry, and
employment opportunities vary from region to region, and wealth is not distributed. It is said to
offer more opportunities and benefits to citizens of poorer conditions may be. Therefore, between
the rich and the poor, saying to send Federalism is the state government self-sufficient and is
concerned with the development of their own regions. It is possible to create policies that could

5
Be dangerous to other regions. For example, pollution from the provinces of industrialization
development in a major way affecting other regions largely through agriculture and cause
damage. Federalism is remembered to eliminate poverty.
In New York, there are poor neighborhoods like Harlem with a majority of black populations.
The reason for this can be the term of employment: it is the intellectuals and the masses are
invited those local governments. The smart person does not understand the local needs properly
and so, the rules can provide better results.
In other words, there is an Islamic State in an Islamic non-federal government form to invite and
possibly later or blind out of the country. In India, USA, Australia, Brazil, Mexico, Argentina are
some of the federal states are the forms of government. The issue of Islam today is not one of
them having a Muslim state. Because they know that it will only result in conflict. When the
Philippines comes to Bangsamoro State's idea. Learn from the mistakes of Russia. And now it
pays a hefty cost. The government and religion need to look for it. Not the Philippine legislators
understand it? But trying to be blind everything about the environment Or it is possible that
legislators in the Philippines "bought and paid for"

Communism vs. Capitalism

This article is what I bring over communism vs. capitalism debate. It talks about the main points
of difference between communism and capitalism Communism vs capitalism disputes a war
between two sophisticated socioeconomic theories. These are the theories that represent two
natural opposing ways of thinking. One is extremely individualistic (capitalism), while another
(Communism) believes in putting the society in front of self-esteem. Communism vs. capitalism
is increasingly polarized in the world during the cold war. These articles describe all measures of
communism vs. capitalism debate and recount two ideologies while comparing their point of
view.

6
Communism vs. Capitalism

Here is a straightforward comparison between communism and capitalism, which deals with
the advantages and disadvantages of the same ideology.

Communism vs. Capitalism: diversification in production methods

The main point of difference between capitalism and communism is about the ownership of
'production means' or resources in general. Communism Disrupts private property of the land or
any of its major resources. Instead, all 'production methods' are like the land and other
resources that the state must possess. By the way here, I refer to the entire community of
people.

Everything in the land and resources can make the production of goods and services belong to
one and all. Everyone shared! All decisions about production are done through the entire
community through a democratic way. There are fair wages for everyone. All decisions are
taken according to what is good for everyone.

On the other hand, capitalism assumes private land ownership and refers to production. Every
person has to own his or her worth. The major part of the profits generated from a business
goes to people who own production methods, while workers who are responsible for running
businesses have a small share of. Everyone takes his wages according to his goodness, and
according to the minds of those who possess the means of production. It's only natural that
people who are self-production methods, the capitalists, are calling shots when it comes to
making a decision!

7
These are the main bones of conflicts between two ideologies, possession of production
methods! Both are serious ideas. While communism is able to kill the ideas of individual
businesses, led by most technological changes we see today, capitalism is the beneficial seed,
which has so much wealth and so power, which is together in one place in the hands of a few
people.

Everything in the land and resources can make the production of goods and services belong to
one and all. Everyone shared! All decisions about production are done through the entire
community through a democratic way. There are fair wages for everyone. All decisions are
taken according to what is good for everyone.

On the other hand, capitalism assumes private land ownership and refers to production. Every
person has to own his or her worth. The major part of the profits generated from a business
goes to people who own production methods, while workers who are responsible for running
businesses have a small share of. Everyone takes his wages according to his goodness, and
according to the minds of those who possess the means of production. It's only natural that
people who are self-production methods, the capitalists, are calling shots when it comes to
making a decision!

These are the main bones of conflicts between two ideologies, possession of production
methods! Both are serious ideas. While communism is able to kill the ideas of individual
businesses, led by most technological changes we see today, capitalism is the beneficial seed,
which has so much wealth and so power, which is together in one place in the hands of a few
people.

8
Communism vs. Capitalism: Individual Freedom

As I said before, communism and capitalism are two major points of view, with diverse views on
individual freedom. Communism questions one to put the society in front of the individual, while
capitalism sets apart individual freedom, before the society.

Therefore, the polarity between the two ideologies is the 'individualism vs Social welfare'.
Capitalism gives more importance to individual aspirations and desires to follow the selfish
character, which is to follow for all mankind. Pure selfishness is a result of instinct self-
preservation.

Communism will show our more righteous part, in which we can think of others before
ourselves. It is a noble thought, which goes against the innocent selfishness of the human being,
though it is an admirable character of their various traits.

Two more points of view, their benefits, and the damages. Some of the greatest advances in
human history have been attributed to individual convergence and trade, which are self-service,
even though they eventually receive the benefit of society. Communism can kill individual
creation streaks, by making a person do what he says. In other words, it is the danger of killing
the creativity and original thinking.

Capitalism, on the other hand, to feed on selfish desires can make capitalist autocrats able to
prevent the lives and deaths of thousands of people, to exploit. Read more, 'Pros and cons of
capitalism'.

9
Communism vs Capitalism: Society

Communism is the focus of a classless, egalitarian society, in which all men and women are
placed in the same state. No ethnicity, race, religion or even nationality! In this way, there is
nothing to fight. It is as beautiful as an idea, but trying to implement this idea is difficult and
asking people to provide all the things that make them different, is that is not fair! Each person
is unique and different from his own way.

Capitalism emphasizes diversity. In fact the major diversity of the rich and the poor, the rich and
the poor. The rich and poor are the ones to get the poorest under capitalism. The varieties of
rich people.

Control of production methods and wields power, as imposing their own diverse and social
capabilities.

Communism vs. Capitalism: Anatomy of power

Communism calls for a higher standard of altruism, while capitalism promotes selfishness. Let us
think about what happens in the power of the same ideology! Capitalism naturally concentrates
on wealth and therefore, power in the hands of people owning production methods. Thus, it
creates a wealthy elite control of wealth, resources and power. Thus, they naturally decide on
the distribution of power.

In communism, that is to say, if all mankind is a godly character, and altruistic in unselfishness,
the distribution of power can be justified. All decisions made in a democratic manner and
unreasonably rules in favor of a few!

10
However, this is not the case here, people are pure greed and the powers of power are so that
these destructive thoughts and the full power can be totally destructive. We have examples of
how communism will concentrate on the full power of a whole nation, in the hands of one man,
in Stalinist Russia! So, both ideologies can fail and create an unrighteous society!

Finally what we need is a balanced way, which is a combination of good points in both
ideologies. A mixed economy where the conditions of control over all the important resources of
a country, provide assistance to the poor, while also enhancing free exercise! Communism as a
serious form of socialism.

Recommended Document
[1] Nene Pimentel gives details on proposal for federalist government
[2] Documents Like To Maxime Bernier: Restoring our Federal Union

11