Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Advancement of technology
to improve seismic performance
of concrete bridge after Kobe earthquake
Hikaru NAKAMURA
Nagoya University, Japan
Hanshin-Awaji (Kobe) Earthquake
Date : January 17, 1995
Magnitude : 7.2
Type : inland type due to active fault
Depth of epicenter : 14km
Max. Acc. : 818cm/s2
The dead persons : 6425
Economic Loss 100billion Euro
e
Intraslab
at
100km
pl
Outbreak of
fic
ci
magma
Pa
150km
Mechanism of earthquakes
Kobe Earthquake
on January 17, 1995
Kobe Earthquake occurred at Hyogo
Prefecture in 1995.
Magnitude : 7.2
Type : inland
Depth of epicenter : 14km
Max. Acc. : 818cm/s2
Magnitude : 6.7
Type : intraslab
Depth of epicenter : 50km
Max. Acc. : 830cm/s2
Damage due to Geiyo Earthquake on
March 24, 2001
Typical Damage
For pier, the spalling of the concrete cover and the buckling of the
longitudinal re-bars occurred.
For the floor slab at the end of girder, damage occurred due to the
collision between girders.
Damage of Chiyoda highway bridge
Left photo shows the flexural failure in the piers in which spalling of
concrete cover and buckling of the longitudinal re-bars were observed.
Right photo shows the punching shear failure at support due to
horizontal force from anchor.
Damage of Uroho-gawa railway bridge
Capacity
Moment
Magnitude : 7.1
Type : intraslab
Depth of epicenter : 71km
Max. Acc. : 1106cm/s2
(a) damage of end column (view from a) (b) damage of intermediate column (view from b)
Two of the end columns failed in shear with the spalling of the cover
concrete, while others were observed diagonal cracks. The damage
due to flexure hardly observed.
The feature of structures is that the end columns has severe condition
for shear failure, because they are shorter than intermediate columns
to support simple beam between elevated bridges.
Process of repair and strengthening
of damaged structures
Magnitude : 6.8
Type : inland
Depth of epicenter : 13km
Max. Acc. : 1722cm/s2
Left photo shows damage of end columns failed in shear. The end
columns show severe damage more than intermediate columns. This
failure is the same as the one explained in the South of Sanriku-Oki
Earthquake.
Damage of Uono-gawa Bridge of
Joetsu Shinkansen
The spalling of the concrete cover and buckling of the longitudinal re-bars
occurred at the mid height. Failure occurred at the cut-off plane of the
longitudinal re-bars. Lateral ties at that location detached.
Niigata-ken Chuetsu-oki Earthquake
on July 16, 2007
The Niigata-ken Chuetsu-oki Earthquake
occurred at Mid Niigata Prefecture.
It was caused by inland active fault.
Same type earthquake occurred 3 years ago
near the place.
Magnitude : 6.8
Type : inland
Depth of epicenter : 17km
Max. Acc. : 1018cm/s2
For all structures, the spalling of the concrete cover and buckling of the longitudinal
re-bars occurred at mid height in piers where the longitudinal re-bars are cut off
1.2
reinforcement ratio(%)
JSCE
Railway
Minimum web
0.8 0.2 Highway
0 0
1940 60 80 2000 1940 60 80 2000
year year
Allowable shear stress Min. web reinforcement ratio
Before 1986, the allowable stress design method was applied in JSCE
Specification. Then, the allowable shear stress is large value and the
minimum web reinforcement ratio is small value.
Therefore, structures constructed in 1960’s and 1970’s do not have
sufficient shear capacity. This is the reason that many concrete
structures failed in shear.
Many concrete structures were failed
roadways, railways, the port, and other lifelines
At 1986, limit state design was adopted, then seismic design was described
as one chapter in the specification for design. After Kobe earthquake, seismic
design code was established based on the performance based design.
At 2007, it was included in design code again.
Change of JSCE Specification for
Seismic Performance Verification
1996 JSCE standard specification
for Seismic design
The methods for seismic performance verification of
concrete structures was described basically. It includes
definition of seismic performance, definition of design
earthquake ground motion, modeling and analytical
method and Structural details
END
In the specification, the methods how to consider these items are described.
Concept
The damage is allowable for strong earthquake.
Performance 1 : serviceability
Performance 3 : safety
Performance 2 : serviceability and restoration ability
from social and economic points of view
Important point is to make clear damage for restoration process
Limit values for members
When the seismic performances of structures are verified,
limit values of response should be determined to assure
the defined seismic performance.
Seismic displacement of a member does not exceed the yield
Performance 1 displacement
Seismic shear and torsional capacity of a member, and ultimate
Performance 2 displacement of a member are not reached
Seismic shear capacity of vertical members and self-weight
Performance 3 support capacity is not exceeded
200
0
-200
-400
-600
-800
0 20 40 60 80
Time(S)
-200
-400
0 20 40 60 80
Time(S)
Ultimate
Mm deformation
Damage My,Mn
location Yield
point
Engineering Input to
Subsurface
base layer grounds structures
Earthquake ground
Motion for verification
First, only ground model is solved for input Then, only structure is
earthquake ground motion at the solved for obtained
engineering base layer and obtain the wave ground motion at the
form at the base part of structure. base part of structure.
Verification technique
(analytical method)
0(γ+
(τ+τa)r
γa)−a r−1 G
τy
τ−τa=G
(2G0γy)
1
Hysteresis curve G0
(loading) (γ a , τa )
skeleton curve
γy
(− γ a , − τa )
Hysteresis curve
(unloading)
Revised points
9Development of longitudinal re-bar
9Splices of longitudinal re-bar
9Spacing of Lateral Re-bar
9Splices of Lateral Re-bar
9Anchorage of Lateral Re-bar
Development of longitudinal re-bar
Cut off
plane
Vu : shear force
Vydl : design shear capacity at termination point of re-bar
Mu : flexural moment
Ml : flexural moment at termination point of re-bar
Mudl : design flexural moment at termination point of re-bar
a≦b
s≦a/2 and s≦12φl
ties
ties(diameter φt)
(diameter φl) Shear failure Buckling
Damage due to insufficient amount of lateral re-bar
Anchorage and splices of lateral re-bar
superstructure
Injected longitudinal
direction
mortar Hoop Fiber
pier Rebar direction
Steel plate
Top coat
footing
RC jacket
RC jacket at the root
Girder Girder
Steel Light,
plate High-
2m Strength
Fiber
Scaffold 2m
Cut-off Scaffold
Cofferdam Section
River River
Anchor
Retrofit of
Cut-off Zone
Enhancement
of Ductility
H-beam Retrofit in
Vertical Gap between Plastic Hinge Zone
Jacket and Top of Footing
Enhancement of Flexural
Strength by Anchor Bars
Usual method
Steel Jacketing
MERIT
• Additional cross
section is thin
• Construction
period is short
DEMERIT
• Retrofit materials
is heavy
Merit
No welding work
¾ Good joint quality
¾ No scaffold
Coupler
かみ合わせ
継手joint
Steel
補強
plate
鋼板
RC jacket
cofferdam
water
soil
Strut
( steel pipe)
hold concrete
Steel pipe
footing
RC jacket RC jacket
cofferdam
Steel sheet
piles
water water
soil soil
RC jacket
Usual method
Restrainers
PELDAMPER
Restrainers
Utilization of Seismic Isolator
Retrofit Concept
Elongation of natural period
Enhancement of damping
Seismic Isolation
Seismic Isolator
72
Vibration Control System
Usual Design Expansion joint
Reduction of
displacement
Isolation
bearing unseating prevention
device Scale down of
expansion joint
Omission of unseating
prevention device
Vibration control
dumper is applied
Vibration Control Reduction of
Expansion joint seismic force
Isolation
bearing Dumper Scale down of
isolation bearing
brace