A Comparative Study On Construction Cost of Same Structural System in Different Seismic Zones of Bangladesh PDF

A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON CONSTRUCTION COST OF SAME
STRUCTURAL SYSTEM IN DIFFERENT SEISMIC ZONES

OF BANGLADESH
BY
MD. SOEBUR RAHMAN
MASTER OF SCIENCE IN ENGINEERING
(CIVIL & STRUCTURAL)
DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING

BANGLADESH UNIVERSITY OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY
2011
i
The thesis titled “A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON CONSTRUCTION COST OF
SAME STRUCTURAL SYSTEM IN DIFFERENT SEISMIC ZONES OF
BANGLADESH” Submitted by Md. Soebur Rahman, Roll No: 040804307 (P),
Session: April 2008, has been accepted as satisfactory in partial fulfillment of the
requirement for the degree of Masters of Science in Engineering (Civil and Structural)
on 28 September 2011.
BOARD OF EXAMINERS
...................................... Chairman
Dr. Munaz Ahmed Noor
Professor
Department of Civil Engineering
BUET, Dhaka
...................................... Member
Dr. Md. Shafiul Bari
Professor
BUET, Dhaka
...................................... Member
Dr. Md. Mujibur Rahman (Ex-officio)
Professor & Head
BUET, Dhaka
...................................... Member
Dr. Md. Nazrul Islam (External)
Professor
DUET, Gazipur
ii
CANDIDATE'S DECLARATION
It is hereby declared that this thesis or any part of it has not been submitted elsewhere
for the award of any degree or diploma.
Signature of the Candidate
Name of the Candidate
iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The author wishes to express his deepest gratitude to his supervisor Dr. Munaz
Ahmed Noor, Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, BUET, for his continuous
guidance, invaluable suggestion and affectionate encouragement at every stage of this
study.
The author wishes to express sincere gratitude to Dr Mujibur Rahman, Professor and
Head, Department of Civil Engineering, BUET, for allowing the author to use
different facilities in connection with this work.
The author is grateful to Dr. Shafiul Bari, Department of Civil Engineering, BUET,
for his helpful suggestion in the successful completion of this research work.
The author wishes to express his profound gratitude to Dr. Md. Nazrul Islam,
Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, DUET, for his encouragement and
guidance in the successful completion of this research work.
The author is grateful to Major General Hameed-Al-Hasan, ndc, Commandant, MIST,

Bangladesh Army for his encouragement to carry out and complete this work.
The author wishes to express sincere gratitude to Major General Mohd Habibur
Rahman Khan, ndc, psc, Engineer in Chief, Bangladesh Army for his encouragement
to carry out and complete this study.
The author is grateful to Colonel Md. Syeed Anwarul Islam, Director of Works, Army
Head Quarter, E in C's Branch, for his encouragement and give different facilities for
completion of this research work.
The author also appreciatively remembers the assistance and encouragement of his
friends and well wishers and everyone related to carry out and complete his study.
Finally, the author acknowledges his parents, wife and also daughter whose sacrifice
made this work possible.
iv
ABSTRACT
Geographical location of Bangladesh makes it ideally suited to natural disasters.

Tectonic frame work of Bangladesh and adjoining areas indicate that Bangladesh is
situated adjacent to the plate margins of India and Eurasia where devastating
earthquakes occurred in the past. The historical seismicity data of Bangladesh and
adjoining areas indicate that Bangladesh is vulnerable to earthquake hazards. As
Bangladesh is the world’s most densely populated area, any future earthquake shall
affect more people per unit area than any other seismically active regions of the
world. The pattern of the ground surface acceleration contours having 200 year return
period presented in forms the basis of seismic zoning of Bangladesh. In the light of
these after various researches BNBC, 1993 has been divided into three seismic zones,
namely zone-3, zone-2 and zone-1 with zone-3 and zone-1 being the most severed and
at least respectively. The occurrence of earthquakes in an earthquake prone region can
not be prevented. So it is suggested to follow seismic code in order to reduce the loss
of life.
The engineers do not attempt to make earthquake proof buildings that will not get
damaged even during the rare but strong earthquake; such buildings will be too robust
and also too expensive. Instead, the engineering intention is to make buildings
earthquake resistant; such buildings resist the effects of ground shaking, although they
may get damaged severely but would not collapse during the strong earthquake. It
mainly depends on proper choice of structural system, combination of load, design
and detailing, compressive strength and reinforcement used in structure. Thus, safety
of people and contents is assured in earthquake-resistant buildings, and thereby a
disaster is avoided. This is a major objective of seismic design codes throughout the
world. This study has discussed about various structural system and strength of
materials for three seismic zones of Bangladesh.
The present study is aimed at finding out the variation of costing for a building of
same structural system in three seismic zones of Bangladesh. To achieve the aim of
this study, three different height of structures 90 feet (27.43 meter), 120 feet (36.37
meter) and 152 feet (46.4 meter) have been selected for two values of R (8, 12).
ETABS 9.5 and SAFE 8.1.0 software are used for analysis and design of various
structural elements. In the present study effort has been made to critically evaluate the
effect of seismic load in same structure in three seismic zones of Bangladesh. It is
found that all structural elements of a building are not designed by same load
combination. The structural elements of all these height structures have been designed
based on wind load combination at seismic zine-1 for both values of R. Few structural
v
elements of these structures are designed based on seismic load combination. Few are
designed on wind load combination at zone-2 for both values of R. Most of the
structural elements of these structures are designed based on seismic load
combination for R equal to 8 and 12 at seismic zone-3.
It has been observed that when height of the structures is increased, more structural
elements are designed based on wind combination. So, seismic load has more effect
comparatively on mid height structures. It has been also found that when a beam
designed by seismic load combination, the increment of negative reinforcement at
higher seismic zone is comparatively higher than positive reinforcement.
Average reinforcement and concrete required for beams and columns in each square
feet, has been calculated separately for three seismic zones of Bangladesh. It is found
that average reinforcement required per square feet of a building is 1.87 kg, 2.09 kg
and 2.29 kg in zone-1, zone-2 and zone-3 for R equal to 8 respectively. In the same
way, reinforcement required in each square feet for a building are 1.87, 1.98 and 2.12
kg in zone-1, zone-2 and zone-3 for R equal to 12. Similarly, concrete required per
square feet of a building is 0.30 cft, 0.32 cft and 0.34 cft in zone-1, zone-2 and zone-3
respectively for both values of R equal to 8 and 12.
vi
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Acknowledgement iv
Abstract v
List of Tables x
List of Figures xi
Notations xiv
CHAPTER-1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 General 1
1.2 Background and Present Status of Problem 2
1.3 Objectives with specific Aims and Possible Outcome 3
1.4 Outline of the Methodology 3
1.5 Layout of Thesis 4
CHAPTER-2 LITERATURE REVIEW

2.1 General 5
2.2 Previous Study 6
2.3 Earthquake 7
2.3.1 Causes of Earthquakes 8
2.3.2 Continental Drift and Plate Tectonics 10
2.3.3 Faults 12
2.3.4 Earthquake Parameters 13
2.3.5 Earthquake Measurement 14
2.4 Seismic Hazards 15

2.4.1 Methodology for Preparing Seismic Hazard Map 16
2.4.2 Attenuation Law of Peak Ground Acceleration 17
2.4.3 Selection of Earthquakes Around the Site 17
2.4.4 Major Past Earthquake and Affecting Area of 18
Indian Sub Continent
2.4.5 Seismic Hazard Map of Bangladesh 20
2.5 Seismic Zoning of Bangladesh 21

2.5.1 Regional Tectonics of Indian Sub-continent 22
2.5.2 Geological Setting 24
2.5.3 Tectonics and Geology 25
2.5.4 Structure and Seismicity 26
2.5.5 Vulnerability of Cities 27
2.5.6 Seismic Zoning and Zone Coefficients 28
2.6 Structural System and Response Modification Coefficient 31

2.6.1 Bearing Wall System 32
2.6.2 Building Frame System 33
2.6.3 Moment - Resisting Frame System 34
vii
2.6.4 Dual System 35
2.6.5 Special Structural System 36
2.6.6 The Evolution of Seismic Codes and R 36
2.7 Seismic Effect and Force on Structure 41

2.7.1 Inertia Forces in Structures 42
2.7.2 Effect of Deformations in Structures 42
2.7.3 Horizontal and Vertical Shaking 43
2.7.4 Flow of Inertia Forces to Foundations 44
2.7.5 Response of Tall Buildings 45
2.7.6 Seismic Forces 46
2.7.7 Analysis of Seismic Force 47
2.8 Earthquake Design Philosophy and Detailing 52

2.8.1 Flexural Members 53
2.8.2 Members Subjected to Flexural and Axial Loads 57
2.8.3 Beam-Column Joints 61
2.8.4 Anchoring Beam Bars 64
2.8.5 Shear Walls 66
2.9 Estimating and Costing 68

2.9.1 Details of Measurements and Calculation of Quantities 68
2.9.2 Abstract of Estimated Cost 69
2.9.3 Plinth Area Rates 69
2.9.4 Analysis of Materials 70
CHAPTER – 3 SELECTED STRUCTURES
3.1 General 71
3.2 Design Criteria 71

3.2.1 Loads 71
3.2.2 Materials Property 72
3.2.3 Structural System 72
3.2.4 Response Modification Factor 73
3.2.5 Detailing 73
3.3 Structural Stability 73

3.3.1 Drift 74
3.3.2 Overturning 74
3.4 Models 74
3.5 Software 78
viii
CHAPTER – 4 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
4.1 General 79
4.2 90 Feet (27.43 meter) Height Structure 79

4.2.1 Analysis Results 80
4.2.2 Comparison of Design Results 85
4.2.2.1 Beam Reinforcement 85
4.2.2.2 Column Reinforcement 91
4.2.3 Total Reinforcement for Beam and Column 93
4.2.4 Comparison of Reinforcement among Zones 95
4.2.5 Comparison of Concrete among Zones 95

4.3.2.3 Shear Wall Reinforcement 107
4.3.3 Total Reinforcement for Beam, Column and Shear wall 107

4.4.2.3 Shear Wall Reinforcement 120
4.4.3 Total Reinforcement for Beam, Column and Shear wall 120
CHAPTER-5 CONCLUSIONS
5.1 General 124

5.2 Conclusion of the study 124
5.3 Recommendation for future studies 128
References 129
Appendix - A 132
Appendix - B 133
Appendix - C 134
Appendix - D 135
Appendix - E 136
Appendix - F 143
Appendix - G 158
Appendix - H 173
Appendix - J 188
Appendix - K 190
Appendix - L 191
ix
LIST OF TABLES
Table No Description Page
2.1 Attenuation Laws 17
2.2 Significant Seismic Sources and Maximum (Bolt, 1987) 20
2.3 Operational Basis Earthquake, Maximum Credible Earthquake 20

and depth of focus of earthquakes for different seismic sources
3.1 Load Combinations 72
x
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure No Description Page
2.1 Inside the earth 9

2.2 Local convective currents in the mantle 9
2.3 Wagener’s theory of continental drift 10
2.4 Major tectonic plate on the earth’s surface 11
2.5 Tectonic plate movement 12
2.6 Type of faults 13
2.7 Geometric notation of earthquake 14
2.8 Arrival of seismic waves at a site 15
2.9 Earthquake occurred around Bangladesh 18
2.10 Faults line in and around Bangladesh 19
2.11 Seismic hazard map of Bangladesh 21
2.12 India’s northward-drift by last 70 million years 23
2.13 Estimated Slip potential along the Himalaya 23
2.14 Generalized geological map of Bangladesh and adjacent areas 24
2.15 Geographical Layout and Tectonic Plate Boundaries at India 25
2.16 Vulnerability of Earthquakes risk cities in Bangladesh 27
2.17 Seismic Map Showing the 200 year Ground Surface Acceleration 28
Contours in Bangladesh and Neighborhoods
2.18 Seismic zoning map of Bangladesh 30
2.19 Bearing wall system 32
2.20 Building frame system 33
2.21 Moment-resisting frame system 34
2.22 Dual structural system 36
2.23 Inertia force and relative motion within a building 43
2.24 Principal directions of seismic force in a building 44
2.25 Response of tall building during earthquake 45
2.26 Center of mass (CM) and center of rigidity (CR) at different locations 46
2.27 Distribution of lateral forces in multistory building 51
2.28 Location and amount of longitudinal steel bars in beams 54
2.29 Details of lapping reinforcement in beams 55
2.30 Details of confinement reinforcement 56
2.31 Location and spacing of vertical stirrups in beam 57
2.32 Weak beam strong column concept 58
2.33 Location and spacing of ties in column 60
2.34 Beam-column joint of a building 61
2.35 Pull-push forces on joint 62
2.36 Transverse reinforcement for joint (not confined by structural members) 63
2.37 Transverse reinforcement for joint (confined by structural members) 63
2.38 Stages for providing horizontal ties in the joint 64
2.39 Anchorage of beam bars in exterior joint 65
2.40 Development length 66
xi
2.41 Shear walls and reinforcement 67
3.1 Plan and front elevation for 90 feet (27.43 meter) height structure 75
3.2 Plan and front elevation of 130 feet (39.62 meter) height structure 76
3.3 Plan and front elevation of 150 feet (45.72 meter) height structure 77
4.1 Storey displacement along X-direction (R=8) - 90• 80
4.2 Storey displacement along X-direction (R=12) 81
4.3 Storey displacement along Y-direction (R=8) 81
4.4 Storey displacement along Y-direction (R=12) 82
4.5 Storey drift along X-direction (R=8) 85
4.6 Storey drift along X-direction (R=12) 83
4.7 Storey drift along Y-direction (R=8) 83
4.8 Storey drift along Y-direction (R=12) 84
4.9 Weight of structure in three seismic zones - 90• 84
4.10 Base shear in three seismic zones (R=8 and 12) 85
4.11 A beam BC in different seismic zone 86
4.12 Negative reinforcement in beam BC (R=8 and 12) 87
4.13 Positive reinforcement in beam BC (R = 8 and 12) 87
4.14 A group of beams in same seismic zone for various R. 88
4.15 Negative reinforcement at zone-3 for various beams (R=8 and 12) 89
4.16 Negative reinforcement at in zone-2 for various beams (R=8 and 12) 89
4.17 Positive reinforcement in zone-2 in different beam (R = 8 and 12) 90
4.18 Total reinforcement in beam (R =8 and 12). 90
4.19 A column in three seismic zones. 97
4.20 Reinforcement for selected column in three seismic zones (R = 8) 92
4.21 Reinforcement for selected column in three seismic zones (R = 12) 92
4.22 Total reinforcement for columns (R=8 and 12) 93
4.23 Total reinforcement in three seismic zones (R=8 and 12) 94
4.24 Reinforcement required in each square feet (R = 8 and 12) 94
4.25 Reinforcement comparison between zone-1and-2, zone-2 and-3 (R = 8 95
and 12)
4.26 Comparison of total concrete among three seismic zones 95
4.27 Concrete required in each square feet for three seismic zones 96
4.28 Comparison of concrete between zone-1 and zone-2, zone-2 and zone-3 96
4.29 Storey displacement along X-direction (R = 8 and 12) - 120• 98
4.30 Storey displacement along Y-direction (R = 8 and 12) 98
4.31 Storey drift along X-direction (R = 8 and 12) 99
4.32 Storey drift along Y-direction (R = 8 and 12) 99
4.33 Weight of building in three seismic Zones 100
4.34 Base Shear in three seismic Zones (R = 8 and 12) - 120• 100
4.35 A beam BC in different seismic zones. 102
4.36 Negative reinforcement in beam BC (R = 8 and 12) 103
4.38 Total reinforcement in beams (R=8 and 12) 114
4.39 A column in three seismic zones 105
4.40 Reinforcement for selected column in three seismic zones(R = 8 and 12) 106
4.41 Total reinforcement for column (R=8 and 12) 106
4.42 Total reinforcement for shear wall (R=8 and 12) 107
4.43 Total reinforcement in three seismic zones(R=8 and 12) 108
4.44 Reinforcement in each square feet ((R=8 and 12) 108
xii
4.45 Comparison of reinforcement between zone-1and zone-2, zone-2 and 109
zone-3 (R= 8 and 12)
4.47 Concrete in each square feet for three seismic zones 110
4.48 Comparison of concrete between zone-1 and zone-2, zone-2 and zone-3 110
4.49 Storey displacement along X-direction (R = 8 and 12) - 150• 112
4.50 Storey displacement along Y-direction (R = 8 and12) 112
4.51 Storey drift along X-direction (R = 8 and12) 113
4.52 Storey drift along Y-direction (R = 8 and 12) 113
4.53 Weight of building in three Seismic Zones 114
4.54 Base shear in three seismic zones (R = 8 and 12) 114
4.55 A beam BC in different zones 115
4.56 Negative reinforcement in beam BC (R=8 and 12) 116
4.58 Total beam reinforcement (R=8 and 12). 117
4.59 A column in three seismic zones 118
4.60 Reinforcement for selected column in three seismic zones (R = 8 and 119
12)
4.61 Total reinforcement for Column (R=8 and12) 119
4.62 Total reinforcement for shear wall (R=8 and 12) 120
4.63 Total reinforcement in three seismic zones (R=8 and 12) 121
4.64 Reinforcement in each square feet for three seismic zones 121
(R=8and12)
4.65 Comparison of reinforcement between zone-1and zone-2, zone-2 122
and zone-3
4.67 Concrete in each square feet for three seismic zones 123
4.68 Comparison of concrete between zone-1 and zone-2, zone-2 and 123
zone-3
xiii
NOTATIONS
Base Shear - V
Seismic zone Co-efficient - Z
Structural Importance co-efficient - I
Seismic Dead load - W
Response Modification co-efficient - R
Numeric co-efficient/horizontal force factor - C
Time period of the structural - T
Site co-efficient of soil - S
Total height of the structure above the base - hn
Structural type co-efficient - Ct
Lateral force applied at storey level –i - Fi
Concentrated lateral force at the top - Ft
Mass of the building - M
Columns Moment - Mc
Girders Moment - Mg
Development length - l dh
Yield strength of Reinforcement - Fy
Dia of bar - d
Compressive strength of concrete - f
xiv
APPENDIX K
Estimate Beam Elements for a Structure by using Microsoft Excel
bar no of Beam no of Beam no of lap total dim. & weight

dim item Length bar Depth Laps Length length 8 10 12 16 20 22 25
(mm) (Nos) (m) (Nos) (m) (Nos) (m) (m) 0.395 0.616 0.888 1.579 2.466 2.98 3.85
1) Reinforcement of Beam
PB-2 (2Nos)
Top-1 16 1 4.63 2 0.375 1 0.46 10.93 0 0 0 17.25847 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 16 1 4.63 5 0.375 1 0.46 27.33 0 0 0 43.14618 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 20 1 1.53 3 0 0 0 4.59 0 0 0 0 11.31894 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 10 1 0.265 58 0 0 0 15.37 0 9.46792 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
190
PB-1 (1 Nos) `
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PB-3 (1Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-1 (2Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-2 (1Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-3 (2Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-5 (2Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-6 (2 Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-7 (2 Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-8 (2 Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-9 (2 Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-10 (2 Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-11 (2Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-12 (1 Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total = 0.00 9.47 0.00 60.40 11.32 0.00 0.00

Summary kg kg kg kg kg kg kg
1) 8mm Q 0.000 kg
2) 10mm Q 9.468 kg
3) 12mm Q 0.000 kg
40 Grade 9.468 kg
4) 16mm Q 60.405 kg
5) 20mm Q 11.319 kg
6) 22mm Q 0.000 kg
7) 25mm Q 0.000 kg
60 Grade 71.724 kg
2) Rainforcement of Beam 1st Floor Roof
B-1 (2Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-2 (1Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-3 (2Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-4 (2Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-5 (2Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-6 (2 Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-7 (2 Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-8 (2 Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-9 (2 Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-10 (2 Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-11 (2Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-12 (1 Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SB-1 (1Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

1) 8mm Q 0.000 kg
2) 10mm Q 0.000 kg
3) 12mm Q 0.000 kg
40 Grade 0.000 kg
4) 16mm Q 0.000 kg
5) 20mm Q 0.000 kg
6) 22mm Q 0.000 kg
7) 25mm Q 0.000 kg
60 Grade 0.000 kg
3) Rainforcement of Beam 2nd Floor Roof
B-1 (2Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-2 (1Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-3 (2Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-4 (2Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-5 (2Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-6 (2 Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-7 (2 Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-8 (2 Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-9 (2 Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-10 (2 Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-11 (2Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-12 (1 Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SB-1 (1Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

1) 8mm Q 0.000 kg
2) 10mm Q 0.000 kg
3) 12mm Q 0.000 kg
40 Grade 0.000 kg
4) 16mm Q 0.000 kg
5) 20mm Q 0.000 kg
6) 22mm Q 0.000 kg
7) 25mm Q 0.000 kg
60 Grade 0.000 kg
4) Rainforcement of Beam 3rd Floor Roof
B-1 (2Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-2 (1Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-3 (2Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-4 (2Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-5 (2Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-6 (2 Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-7 (2 Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-8 (2 Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-9 (2 Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-10 (2 Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-11 (2Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-12 (1 Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SB-1 (1Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

1) 8mm Q 0.000 kg
2) 10mm Q 0.000 kg
3) 12mm Q 0.000 kg
40 Grade 0.000 kg
4) 16mm Q 0.000 kg
5) 20mm Q 0.000 kg
6) 22mm Q 0.000 kg
7) 25mm Q 0.000 kg
60 Grade 0.000 kg
5) Rainforcement of Beam 4th Floor Roof
B-1 (2Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-2 (1Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-3 (2Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-4 (2Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-5 (2Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-6 (2 Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-7 (2 Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-8 (2 Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-9 (2 Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-10 (2 Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-11 (2Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-12 (1 Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SB-1 (1Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

1) 8mm Q 0.000 kg
2) 10mm Q 0.000 kg
3) 12mm Q 0.000 kg
40 Grade 0.000 kg
4) 16mm Q 0.000 kg
5) 20mm Q 0.000 kg
6) 22mm Q 0.000 kg
7) 25mm Q 0.000 kg
60 Grade 0.000 kg
B-1 (2Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-2 (1Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-3 (2Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-4 (2Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-5 (2Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-6 (2 Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-7 (2 Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-8 (2 Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-9 (2 Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-10 (2 Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-11 (2Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-12 (1 Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SB-1 (1Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1) 8mm Q 0.000 kg
2) 10mm Q 0.000 kg
3) 12mm Q 0.000 kg
40 Grade 0.000 kg
4) 16mm Q 0.000 kg
5) 20mm Q 0.000 kg
6) 22mm Q 0.000 kg
7) 25mm Q 0.000 kg
60 Grade 0.000 kg
B-1 (2Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-2 (1Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-3 (2Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-4 (2Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-5 (2Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-6 (2 Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-7 (2 Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-8 (2 Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-9 (2 Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-10 (2 Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-11 (2Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-12 (1 Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SB-1 (1Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

1) 8mm Q 0.000 kg
2) 10mm Q 0.000 kg
3) 12mm Q 0.000 kg
40 Grade 0.000 kg
4) 16mm Q 0.000 kg
5) 20mm Q 0.000 kg
6) 22mm Q 0.000 kg
7) 25mm Q 0.000 kg
60 Grade 0.000 kg
B-1 (2Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-2 (1Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-3 (2Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-4 (2Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-5 (2Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-6 (2 Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-7 (2 Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-8 (2 Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-9 (2 Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-10 (2 Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-11 (2Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-12 (1 Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SB-1 (1Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

1) 8mm Q 0.000 kg
2) 10mm Q 0.000 kg
3) 12mm Q 0.000 kg
40 Grade 0.000 kg
4) 16mm Q 0.000 kg
5) 20mm Q 0.000 kg
6) 22mm Q 0.000 kg
7) 25mm Q 0.000 kg
60 Grade 0.000 kg
B-1 (2Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-2 (1Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-3 (2Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-4 (2Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-5 (2Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-6 (2 Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-7 (2 Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-8 (2 Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-9 (2 Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-10 (2 Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-11 (2Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-12 (1 Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
SB-1 (1Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

1) 8mm Q 0.00 kg
2) 10mm Q 0.00 kg
3) 12mm Q 0.00 kg
40 Grade 0.00 kg
4) 16mm Q 0.00 kg
5) 20mm Q 0.00 kg
6) 22mm Q 0.00 kg
7) 25mm Q 0.00 kg
60 Grade 0.00 kg

B-1 (2Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-2 (1Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-3 (2Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-4 (2Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-5 (2Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-6 (2 Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-7 (2 Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-8 (2 Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-9 (2 Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-10 (2 Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-11 (2Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-12 (1 Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
SB-1 (1Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

1) 8mm Q 0.00 kg
2) 10mm Q 0.00 kg
3) 12mm Q 0.00 kg
40 Grade 0.00 kg
4) 16mm Q 0.00 kg
5) 20mm Q 0.00 kg
6) 22mm Q 0.00 kg
7) 25mm Q 0.00 kg
60 Grade 0.00 kg
B-1 (2Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-2 (1Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-3 (2Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-4 (2Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-5 (2Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-6 (2 Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-7 (2 Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-8 (2 Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-9 (2 Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-10 (2 Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-11 (2Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-12 (1 Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SB-1 (1Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

1) 8mm Q 0.00 kg
2) 10mm Q 0.00 kg
3) 12mm Q 0.00 kg
40 Grade 0.00 kg
4) 16mm Q 0.00 kg
5) 20mm Q 0.00 kg
6) 22mm Q 0.00 kg
7) 25mm Q 0.00 kg
60 Grade 0.00 kg
B-1 (2Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-2 (1Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-3 (2Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-4 (2Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-5 (2Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-6 (2 Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-7 (2 Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-8 (2 Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-9 (2 Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-10 (2 Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-11 (2Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-12 (1 Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
SB-1 (1Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

1) 8mm Q 0.00 kg
2) 10mm Q 0.00 kg
3) 12mm Q 0.00 kg
40 Grade 0.00 kg
4) 16mm Q 0.00 kg
5) 20mm Q 0.00 kg
6) 22mm Q 0.00 kg
7) 25mm Q 0.00 kg
60 Grade 0.00 kg
B-1 (2Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-2 (1Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-3 (2Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-4 (2Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-5 (2Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-6 (2 Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-7 (2 Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-8 (2 Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-9 (2 Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-10 (2 Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-11 (2Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-12 (1 Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
SB-1 (1Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

1) 8mm Q 0.00 kg
2) 10mm Q 0.00 kg
3) 12mm Q 0.00 kg
40 Grade 0.00 kg
4) 16mm Q 0.00 kg
5) 20mm Q 0.00 kg
6) 22mm Q 0.00 kg
7) 25mm Q 0.00 kg
60 Grade 0.00 kg
B-1 (2Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-2 (1Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-3 (2Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-4 (2Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-5 (2Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-6 (2 Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-7 (2 Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-8 (2 Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-9 (2 Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-10 (2 Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-11 (2Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-12 (1 Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
SB-1 (1Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

1) 8mm Q 0.00 kg
2) 10mm Q 0.00 kg
3) 12mm Q 0.00 kg
40 Grade 0.00 kg
4) 16mm Q 0.00 kg
5) 20mm Q 0.00 kg
6) 22mm Q 0.00 kg
7) 25mm Q 0.00 kg
60 Grade 0.00 kg
B-1 (2Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-2 (1Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-3 (2Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-4 (2Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-5 (2Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-6 (2 Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-7 (2 Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-8 (2 Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-9 (2 Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-10 (2 Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-11 (2Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-12 (1 Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
SB-1 (1Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

1) 8mm Q 0.00 kg
2) 10mm Q 0.00 kg
3) 12mm Q 0.00 kg
40 Grade 0.00 kg
4) 16mm Q 0.00 kg
5) 20mm Q 0.00 kg
6) 22mm Q 0.00 kg
7) 25mm Q 0.00 kg
60 Grade 0.00 kg
B-1 (2Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-2 (1Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-3 (2Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-4 (2Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-5 (2Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-6 (2 Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-7 (2 Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-8 (2 Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-9 (2 Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-10 (2 Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-11 (2Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-12 (1 Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
SB-1 (1Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

1) 8mm Q 0.00 kg
2) 10mm Q 0.00 kg
3) 12mm Q 0.00 kg
40 Grade 0.00 kg
4) 16mm Q 0.00 kg
5) 20mm Q 0.00 kg
6) 22mm Q 0.00 kg
7) 25mm Q 0.00 kg
60 Grade 0.00 kg
B-1 (2Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-2 (1Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-3 (2Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-4 (2Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-5 (2Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-6 (2 Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-7 (2 Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-8 (2 Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-9 (2 Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-10 (2 Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-11 (2Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-12 (1 Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
SB-1 (1Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 25 2 9.2 6 1 2 3 194.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 748.4
Total = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 748.44

1) 8mm Q 0.00 kg
2) 10mm Q 0.00 kg
3) 12mm Q 0.00 kg
40 Grade 0.00 kg
4) 16mm Q 0.00 kg
5) 20mm Q 0.00 kg
6) 22mm Q 0.00 kg
7) 25mm Q 748.44 kg
60 Grade 748.44 kg
B-1 (2Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-2 (1Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-3 (2Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-4 (2Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-5 (2Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-6 (2 Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-7 (2 Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-8 (2 Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-9 (2 Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-10 (2 Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-11 (2Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-12 (1 Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
SB-1 (1Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

1) 8mm Q 0.00 kg
2) 10mm Q 0.00 kg
3) 12mm Q 0.00 kg
40 Grade 0.00 kg
4) 16mm Q 0.00 kg
5) 20mm Q 0.00 kg
6) 22mm Q 0.00 kg
7) 25mm Q 0.00 kg
60 Grade 0.00 kg
B-1 (2Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-2 (1Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-3 (2Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-4 (2Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-5 (2Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-6 (2 Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-7 (2 Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-8 (2 Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-9 (2 Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-10 (2 Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-11 (2Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-12 (1 Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
SB-1 (1Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 25 2 9.2 6 1 2 3 194.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 748.4
Total = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 748.44

1) 8mm Q 0.00 kg
2) 10mm Q 0.00 kg
3) 12mm Q 0.00 kg
40 Grade 0.00 kg
4) 16mm Q 0.00 kg
5) 20mm Q 0.00 kg
6) 22mm Q 0.00 kg
7) 25mm Q 748.44 kg
60 Grade 748.44 kg
B-1 (2Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-2 (1Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-3 (2Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-4 (2Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-5 (2Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-6 (2 Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-7 (2 Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-8 (2 Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-9 (2 Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-10 (2 Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-11 (2Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-12 (1 Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
SB-1 (1Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 25 2 9.2 6 1 2 3 194.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 748.4
Total = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 748.44

1) 8mm Q 0.00 kg
2) 10mm Q 0.00 kg
3) 12mm Q 0.00 kg
40 Grade 0.00 kg
4) 16mm Q 0.00 kg
5) 20mm Q 0.00 kg
6) 22mm Q 0.00 kg
7) 25mm Q 748.44 kg
60 Grade 748.44 kg
B-1 (2Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-2 (1Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-3 (2Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-4 (2Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-5 (2Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-6 (2 Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-7 (2 Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-8 (2 Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
B-9 (2 Nos) 0
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-10 (2 Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-11 (2Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B-12 (1 Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SB-1 (1Nos)
Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Top-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ext Bottom-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle bar-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stirrups-2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator-2 25 2 9.2 6 1 2 3 194.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 748.4
Total = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 748.44

1) 8mm Q 0.00 kg
2) 10mm Q 0.00 kg
3) 12mm Q 0.00 kg
40 Grade 0.00 kg
4) 16mm Q 0.00 kg
5) 20mm Q 0.00 kg
6) 22mm Q 0.00 kg
7) 25mm Q 748.44 kg
60 Grade 748.44 kg
APPENDIX L
REINFORCEMENT REQUIRED FOR SLAB AND FOOTING (90 FEET HEIGHT

STRUCTURE)
Slab and footing are designed and estimated by using SAFE software of this structure.
It is found that the total reinforcement required for slab is equal in each seismic zone
separately. In the same way, total footing reinforcement is also same in three seismic
zones individually. These total quintiles of reinforcement are required; it is based on
SAFE software calculation. Figure L.1 shows design result for a slab. Reinforcement
required for slab and footing are given below:
Reinforcement required for slab
SAFE – Approximate Quantities
Total Slab Area = 5429.69 sft
Designed Steel Weight = 7.06 Tons
Reinforcement per square feet =1.30 kg
Figure L.1 Design result for a slab in different seismic zones.
191
It is to be also mentioned here that constant bearing capacity of oil has been
considered for design footing of 90 feet height structure in three seismic zones. It has
been found that same quantity of reinforcement required for three seismic zones
individually. It is to be highlighted here that usually footing design based on
minimum reinforcement equation. Figure L.2 shows design result for a slab.
Reinforcement required for footing
SAFE – Approximate Quantities
Designed Steel Weight = 23.53 Tons
Reinforcement per square feet = 0.67 kg
Figure L.2 Design result for a footing in different seismic zones.
192
193
194
CHAPTER - 1
INTRODUCTION
1.1 General
An earthquake is a phenomenon during which strong vibrations occur in the ground

due to release of enormous energy within a short period of time causing sudden
disturbance in the earth’s crust on the upper mantle. In other words it be defined as a
sudden transient motion or series of motions of the ground originating in a limited
region and spreading there in all direction during an earthquake, the ground motions
cause structures to vibrate and induce inertial forces on them. Hence, structures in
such locations need to be suitably designed and detailed to ensure stability, strength
and serviceability with acceptable levels of safety under seismic effects. Systematic
recording and analysis of data collected from previous earthquake and scientific
investigations carried all over the world over the last few decades have resulted in the
establishment of regulations and guidelines for earthquake resistant design of
buildings and structures.
Historical records indicate that most of the losses due to earthquake have occurred
due to collapse of masonry structure. Recent frequent earthquake and the presence of
highly seismic zone in India near the North-Eastern side of Bangladesh have lead us
to the fact that Bangladesh is situated in a seismically active zone. The response of a
building during earthquake is a complicated issue. Till now no mathematical tool is
available to predict the behavior of a structure during earthquake accurately. Basically
this is because of the unpredictable nature of earthquake excitation that might occur at
a specific time and site and then resulting complicated response of a building itself.
Civil engineers all around the world are by tradition, trained for linear analysis.
Consequently, seismic evaluation or design process, which essentially involves a
nonlinear behavior, is linear zed. As relatively new development, seismic evaluation
and design methods offered a great opportunity to engineers such that they are now
able to directly calculate the nonlinear seismic demand and evaluate its consequences
for the structure, which might be considered as break through, is earthquake
engineering. The correct analysis will depend upon the proper modeling of the
behavior of materials, elements connection and structure.
1
Detailing of structure is the important factor to resist earthquake load. There are
different detailing of structural elements subjected to flexural and axial loads. The
building should be planned in such a way that complete analysis of each component is
possible. Based on the severity of the probable intensity of seismic ground motion and
damages, Bangladesh has been divided into three seismic zones. It is possible to
design and construct earthquake resistant building with only small additional cost to
what is needed to build a building.
1.2 Background and Present Status of Problem
Urban development has been rapidly progressing in Bangladesh but no definite idea is
available for readily applying the knowledge to the design and construction costing of
structures in different seismic zones. Bangladesh is recognized as an earthquake prone
country. All buildings must be earthquake resistant with proper planning and
structural design. New housing in Bangladesh seems to be constructed to meet the
social demand, but the effect of earthquake is not properly considered in most of the
cases.
According to probable magnitudes of earthquake, Bangladesh has been divided into

four zones, namely, major damage zone, moderate damage zone, minor damage zone
and negligible damage zone (Khan and Rahman, 2004). But based on the severity of
the probable intensity of the seismic ground motion and damages, Bangladesh has
been divided into three Seismic zones i.e. zone-I, zone-2, zone-3 with zone-3 being
the most severe.
Structural framing system and components shall be designed with adequate stiffness
to have deflections or any other deformations within the serviceability limit (Nilson at
el, 2003). There are different types of structural-system but it is considered based on
height and seismic zone. Structural systems have gradually evolved for residential and
office buildings, reflecting their differing functional requirements.
Estimates of materials, time and cost provide information to some construction

decisions. In construction of a building or in formulating any project, accurate
determination of the quantities of materials and the probable cost of various items of
works are absolutely necessary.
2
Several studies had been carried out on seismic action in various aspects by different
researches. But very few studies have been carried out on cost estimation of building
materials due to seismic load in Bangladesh. The current study is under taken using
different software’s for structural analysis and determination of the cost of same
structural system for different heights with changing response modification
coefficient in three seismic zones. It will help the structural engineers to get ideas
about cost for designing in different seismic zones.
1.3 Objectives with Specific Aims and Possible Outcome
1.3.1 Objectives with Specific Aims
The objective of the study is to conduct a comparative study on construction cost for
the same structural system in three seismic zones in Bangladesh, considering different
height with different response modification coefficient.
1.3.2 Possible Outcome
The study may give an idea to designers about construction cost in three seismic
zones of Bangladesh.
1.4 Outline of the Methodology
The study will be conducted by considering a high rise building for different height of
same structural system in different seismic zones. Same wind load will be considered
for three seismic zones to find out the actual variation of construction materials and its
cost only for seismic load. This study will also be carried out after changing the value
of response modification coefficient (R) for same seismic zones. Plan and elevation of
selected structure will be prepared by Auto CAD.
Modeling, structural analysis of beam, column and shear wall will be carried out by
ETABS 9.5 software. SAFE 8.1.0 software will be used for the design of slab and
foundation. This software is also be used for estimate the different structural elements.
MS Excel will be used to find out the cost of construction material. In cost analysis
estimation will be done mainly for reinforcement and concrete.
3
An extensive comparative study will be carried out for major structural components
among three seismic zones (i.e. comparison of columns, beam and shear walls
material and there costing). All these comparison will be presented graphically. The
findings will enable us to understand the amount of material and its cost for the same
structural system subjected to three seismic zones in Bangladesh.
1.5 Layout of Thesis
The thesis is organized into five chapters. The general background, objective of the
study and methodology of the work are presented in Chapter 1 to give basic idea of
the work being done under the study. Chapter 2 deals with the literature review which
includes few previous studies, earthquake and its causes, preparation of seismic
hazards and zoning map of Bangladesh. This chapter also discusses about various
structural systems and response modification coefficient, seismic effect and force on
structure, seismic detailing for various structural elements and requirement of
estimating of a structure before starting any project. These all are very much related
with the subject of study. In Chapter 3 is discussion about analysis parameters, model
and software used in this study are reported. Chapter 4 is composed of results and
discussion of the research work. Chapter 5 draws conclusions by summarizing the
outcome of the research work and proposes new directions for further research and
developments.
4
CHAPTER - 2
LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 General
The process of urbanization, which started with the age of industrialization, is still in
progress in many parts of the world. In Bangladesh this process began in the
nineteenth century. People migrated from rural to urban areas, thereby forcing an
increase in the density of cities. The building must cope with the vertical forces of
gravity and the horizontal forces of wind above ground and the seismic forces below
ground. Since the foundation is the point of contact between the building and the
earth, seismic force acts on the building by shaking the foundation back and forth.
The response of a building during earthquake is a complicated issue. Till now, no

mathematical tool is available to predict the behavior of a structure during earthquake.
Basically this is because of the unpredictable nature of earthquake excitation that
might occur at a specific time and site and then resulting complicated response of a
building itself.
The design of the structural members in a building is to be based on the internal forces
resulting from a linear elastic analysis using the code-prescribed seismic forces. In
general, these forces are determined considering the buildings location relative to the
seismic source zone or fault, occupancy, site characteristics, structural system, height
and configuration. The magnitude of earthquake loading is a result of the dynamic
response of the building to the shaking of the ground.
The seismic design forces are a fraction of the actual forces that a structure may
experience during an earthquake. For design purpose, the seismic forces are reduced
since it is impractical as well as uneconomical to design a structure for the maximum
probable forces. In order to prevent collapse, structures must be detailed so that they
are able to dissipate the excess earthquake energy through inelastic deformation. In
general the detailing requirements of the structural members in a building depend on
the seismic performance category. Accurate design of a structure is very much related
to find out the proper costing of that structure. In construction of a building or in
formulating any project an accurate determination of the quanties of materials and the
probable cost of various items of works are absolutely necessary.
5
2.2 Previous Study
Different studies had been carried out on seismic action in various aspects by several
researches. It is found that a very few studies are carried out in these particular
aspects. Earthquakes cause immense economic losses. Reducing disaster risk is a top
priority for all concerns. It is also very much helpful for an engineer to know the
difference in cost of a structure in different seismic zones. So the behavior of building
under the influence of seismic load has been a major point of interest for the engineers
over a long period of time. Various researches carried out on earthquake are given
below:
According to Ghosh and Domel (1992), “Design of Concrete Building for Earthquake
and wind Forces.”
a) Two studies are carried out in this book one of its twelve stories moment
resisting frame another twenty stories duel system building. These two studies
are very much related with this subject study. In these study comparisons are
carried out on single exterior and interior column and beam for both structural
systems among four seismic zones of India.
It is observed that difference in average percentage of reinforcement in beam for 12

storied building between zone-0 and zone-1, zone1 and zone 2B, zone 2B and zone 4
are 34%, 33% and 25% respectively. In the same way, difference in column
reinforcement is 1%, 30% and 52%. As it was considered for single beam and
column, so difference between zones are very high. In 20 storied dual systems
structure reinforcement difference for beam between zone 2B and Zone 4 is 10%.
Objective of the research of Sharfuddin was (2004), “Earthquake Hazard Analysis for
Bangladesh.”
a) To develop a homogenous and complete earthquake catalogue.
b) To develop seismic hazard maps of Bangladesh.
Objective of the research of Islam was (2005), “Seismic loss estimation for Sylhet
city.”
a) Improving our understanding of the seismic risk in the study area
b) Supporting enforcement of seismic provisions of building codes
c) Comparing the seismic risk with that of other natural hazards
6
d) Providing a base line for earthquake policy development and comparison of
mitigation alternating.
According to Masud (2007), “Earthquake Risk Analysis for Chittagong City.”

a) To develop seismic microzonation maps for Chittagong for liquefaction, for
site amplification and for landslide.
b) To overlay seismic microzonation maps and geographic information and to
combine their attributes to produce map of local seismic hazards.
The literature reviews are discussed here elaborately and divided into five parts. The
first part describes the earthquake and seismic zoning map of Bangladesh. The second
part concentrates on structural systems and response modification coefficient, both are
very much related with earthquake force. The third part explains response of a
building during earthquake and the calculation of seismic force. The fourth part gives
an overview of the requirement and specification of seismic detailing for different
structural elements to absorb energy during earthquake. Last part gives the idea on
finite element method for different structural elements which are related with the
structural design software used in this study. It also describes the requirement of
estimating and costing of various construction materials. Above mentioned parts are
very much related with subject study.
2.3 Earthquake
An earthquake is a sudden and violent motion of the earth caused by volcanic

eruption, plate tectonics, or man made explosions which lasts for a short time, and
within a very limited region (Bolt, 1991). Earthquake can be expressed as trembling
or shaking movement of the earth's surface (Banglapedia, 2004). Most earthquakes
are minor tremors, while larger earthquakes usually begin with slight tremors, rapidly
take the form of one or more violent shocks, and end in vibrations of gradually
diminishing force called aftershocks.
Earthquake is a form of energy of wave motion, which originates in a limited region

and then spreads out in all directions from the source of disturbance. It usually lasts
for a few seconds to a minute. The point within the earth where earthquake waves
originate is called the focus, from where the vibrations spread in all directions. They
7
reach the surface first at the point immediately above the focus and this point is called
the epicenter. It is at the epicenter where the shock of the earthquake is first
experienced (Banglapedia, 2004).
Earthquakes originate due to various reasons, which fall into two major categories viz
non-tectonic and tectonic. The origin of tectonic earthquakes is explained with the
help of 'elastic rebound theory'. Earthquakes are distributed unevenly on the globe.
However, it has been observed that most of the destructive earthquakes originate
within two well-defined zones or belts namely, 'the circum-Pacific belt' and 'the
Mediterranean-Himalayan seismic belt’. Although Bangladesh is extremely
vulnerable to seismic activity, the nature and the level of this activity is yet to be
defined. Hazards associate with earthquake are commonly referred to as seismic
hazard. Seismic hazards cause tremendous damage around the world each year. The
historical seism city data of Bangladesh and adjoining areas indicate that Bangladesh
is vulnerable to earthquake hazards.
2.3.1 Causes of Earthquakes
Long time ago, a large collection of material masses coalesced to form the Earth.
Large amount of heat was generated by this fusion, and slowly as the Earth cooled
down, the heavier and denser materials sank to the center and the lighter ones rose to
the top. The differentiated earth Figure 2.1, consists of the Inner Core, the Outer Core,
the Mantle and the Crust. The Inner Core is solid and consists of heavy metals (e.g.,
nickel and iron), while the Crust consists of light materials (e.g., basalts and granites).
The Outer Core is liquid in form and the Mantle has the ability to flow. At the Core,
the temperature is estimated to be ~2500°C, the pressure ~4 million atmospheres and
density ~13.5 gm/cc; this is in contrast to ~25°C, 1 atmosphere and 1.5 gm/cc on the
surface of the Earth (Bolt, 1991).
8
Figure 2.1: Inside the earth (Murty, 2005)
Convection currents develop in the viscous Mantle, because of prevailing high
temperature and pressure gradients between the crust and the core, like the convective
flow of water when heated in a beaker Figure 2.2. The energy for the above
circulations is derived from the heat produced from the incessant decay of radioactive
elements in the rocks throughout the Earth’s interior. These convection currents result
in a circulation of the earth’s mass; hot molten lava comes out and the cold rock mass
goes into the Earth. The mass absorbed eventually melts under high temperature and
pressure and becomes a part of the mantle, only to come out again from another
location, someday. Many such local circulations are taking place at different regions
underneath the Earth’s surface, leading to different portions of the Earth undergoing
different directions of movements along the surface. These sudden movements and
series of movements of the earth surface originating in a limited under ground region
spreading from there in all direction is called earthquake.
Figure 2.2: Local convective currents in the mantle (Murty, 2005)
9
A number of natural and human-induced phenomena may give rise to earthquakes:
meteoric impact, volcanic activity, and large landslides, rock bursts in mines,
underground nuclear explosion, and rock stress changes induced by the filling of large
human made reservoirs, and so on. However, the most important earthquakes from an
engineering standpoint - due to their large frequency of occurrence, the energy they
liberate, and the extent of areas they affect - are those associated with the motion of
the earth's crystal plates and are called tectonic earthquakes (Bolt, 1991). From an
engineering stand point of far most importance are the earthquakes of tectonic origin,
that is, those associated with large scale strains in the earth’s crust. Tectonic
earthquakes are believed to occur according to the elastic rebound theory, which was
developed by H.P. Reid subsequent to the San Francisco earthquake of 1906 (Bolt,
1991).
2.3.2 Continental Drift and Plate Tectonics

It is observed that the similarity between the coastlines and geology of eastern South
America and the western Africa and southern part of India and northern part of
Australia had intrigued scientists since the seventeenth century the theory that has
come to be known as continental drift was not proposed until the early twentieth
century (Kramer, 2008). Wagener for example believed that the earth had only one
large continent called Pangaea Zoo million years ago and it broke into pieces that
slowly drifted Figure 2.3, into the present configuration of the continents. The theory
of continental drift did not receive much attention until about 1960 but it was become
populated when new techniques such as deep-water echo sounding, seismic refraction
and piston coring became available.
Figure 2.3: Wagener’s theory of continental drift (Verney, 1979)
10
The original theory of continental drift (Kramer, 2008) suggested images of massive
continents pushing through the seas and across the ocean floor. It was well known,
however, that the ocean floor was too strong to permit such motion, and the theory
was originally discredited by most earth scientists. From this background, however,
the modem theory of plate tectonics began to evolve. The basic hypothesis of plate
tectonics is that the earth's surface consists of a number of large, intact blocks called
plates, and that these plates move with respect to each other. The earth's crust is
divided into six continental-sized plates (African, American, Antarctic, Australia-
Indian, Eurasian, and Pacific) and about 14 of sub continental size (e.g., Caribbean,
Cocos, Nazca, Philippine, etc.). The major plates are shown in Figure 2.4.
Figure 2.4: Major tectonic plate on the earth’s surface (Murty, 2005)
Smaller platelets, or micro plates, have broken off from the larger plates in the
vicinity of many of the major plate boundaries but are not shown here. The relative
deformation between plates occurs only in narrow zones near their boundaries. This
deformation of the plates can occur slowly and continuously (a seismic deformation)
or can occur spasmodically in the form of earthquakes (seismic deformation). Since
the deformation occurs predominantly at the boundaries between the plates, it would
be expected that the locations of earthquakes would be concentrated near plate
boundaries. The plates move against each other with average speed ranging from 1 to
6 cm/year and their interacting boundaries are the areas of earthquake activity Figure
2.5. The theory of plate tectonics is a kinematics theory (i.e., it explains the geometry
of plate movement without addressing the cause of that movement). Something must
11
drive the movement, however, and the tremendous mass of the moving plates requires
that the driving forces be very large (Murty, 2005).
Figure 2.5: Tectonic plate movement (Hamilton, 2003)
Sometimes two plates move away from one another (and rifts are created). In another
case two plates move side by side, along the same direction or in opposite directions
(Bolt, 1991). The relative movement of these plate boundaries varies across the earth.
2.3.3 Faults
In some places one type of rock can be seen butting up against rock of quite another
type along a plane of contact. Such offsets of geological structure are called faults
(Bolt, 1991). Different types of fault are seen in Figure 2.6. Faults may range in
length from a few meters to many kilometers. The presence of such faults indicates
that, at some time in the past, movement took place along them. Such movement
could have been either slow slip, which produces no ground shaking or sudden
rupture (an earthquake). In contrast, the observed surface faulting of most shallow
focus earthquakes is much shorter and shows much less offset. Indeed, in the majority
of earthquakes, fault rupture does not reach the surface and consequently is not
directly visible. Geological mappings and geophysical work show that faults seen at
the surface sometimes extend to depths of tens of kilometers in the earth's crust. It is
worth noting that fault scarp does not occur if fault plane does not propagate to the
surface.
12
Figure 2.6: Type of faults and movement (Murty, 2005)
In seismology and earthquake engineering (Murty, 2005), the primary interest is, of
course, in active faults, along which rock displacements can be expected to occur.
Many of these faults are in well-defined plate-edge regions of the earth, such as the
mid oceanic ridges and young mountain ranges. However, sudden fault displacements
can also occur away from regions of clear present tectonic activity. The classification
of faults depends only on the geometry and direction of relative slip. The dip of a fault
is the angle that fault surface makes with a horizontal plane and the strike is the
direction of the fault line exposed at the ground surface relative to the north.
2.3.4 Earthquake Parameters
Earthquake events are usually described by the following parameters: date, origin
time, epicenter coordinates (geographical latitude and longitude), focal depth,
magnitude, and maximum intensity in Figure 2.7. Other useful parameters are the
fault dimensions and orientation, seismic moment, and spectral characteristics of
recorded ground motions. For large events, isoseismic maps are compiled and reports
are prepared on damage and other effects of the earthquakes.
13
Figure 2.7: Geometric notation of earthquake (Murty, 2005)
In general, earthquakes can be classified according to the focal depth. Earthquakes

with focal depth within 70 km are called shallow earthquakes, those from 70 to 300
km are called intermediate earthquakes, and those beyond 300 km are called deep
earthquakes (Murty, 2005). The limit of focal depth is considered to be 700 km.
However, different classifications of earthquakes regarding the focal depth are used in
various countries.
2.3.5 Earthquake Measurement

Some earthquakes cause large-scale destruction whereas many others cause limited or
no damage. The damage is more for bigger ones and reduces with increasing distance
from the epicenter for the same earthquake. It is useful to study the nature, extent, and
distribution of damage soon after the earthquake. It can be measured by different
ways such as earthquake intensity, ground motion, earthquake magnitude and seismic
waves. The oldest measurement of an earthquake is earthquake intensity. The
earthquake intensity is the violence of an earthquake felt in particular locality.
Intensity is assessed in terms of the associated effects and is dependent on peak
acceleration, velocity, and duration of an earthquake. Ground motion contains a mix
of seismic waves having two primary characteristics as one is the wave amplitude,
which is a measure of the size of the wave. The other is its period, which is a
measurement of the time interval between the arrival of successive peaks or valleys,
known as one cycle. Earthquake Magnitude is a measure of the size of an earthquake,
determined by recorded ground motion amplitude. It is dependent on the amount of
14
energy released at focus and is independent on the place of observation. When an
earthquake occurs, different types of seismic waves are produced: body waves and
surface waves Figure 2.8. Body waves, which can travel through the interior of the
earth, are of two types: p-waves and s-waves. P-waves, also known as primary,
compression or longitudinal waves, involve successive compression and rarefactions
of the materials through which they pass.
Figure 2.8: Arrival of seismic waves at a site (Murty, 2005)
2.4 Seismic Hazards
Hazards associated with earthquakes are commonly referred to as seismic hazards

(Banglapedia, 2004). When an earthquake occurs seismic waves radiate away from
the source and travel rapidly through the earth’s crust when these waves reach the
ground surface. It does not involve merely shaking of the earth, but is accompanied
by various other phenomena. The phenomena important from an engineering
standpoint are seismic tremors, faulting, tsunamis, landslides, liquefaction, etc.
Seismic hazard can be determined by using different methodology but attenuation
laws of peak ground acceleration is much related to find out hazards of an area. It is
also observed that to prepare a seismic hazards information about past earthquakes are
very much required. So in this section it is discussed and earthquake hazard map of
Bangladesh is given in this section. It is also highlighted here that preparation of
seismic zoning map of an area also is related with seismic hazard.
15
2.4.1 Methodology for preparing Seismic Hazard Map
Numerous methods for earthquake hazard assessment in a given site are available
today. Poisson process is using for the occurrence of large earthquakes. This is used
for calculation of occurrence. The general basis for the most complete analysis of the
whole seismic hazard problem is the inclusion of the propagation mechanism of the
ground motion. A methodology for seismic hazard estimation based on historical
earthquake occurrences is presented in detail. In Japan, the seismic risk method
proposed by Kawasumi is still popular while in the United States. A methodology for
seismic hazard estimation based on historical earthquake occurrences is presented in
detail below (Campbell, 1997). The seismic hazard evaluation at a specified site
depends upon the definition of the following four models:
2.4.1.1 Earthquake source model: It is based on geological evidence, Seismic

sources are identified and modeled as a point, line, area or dipping plane. In this
study, a point source model is used.
2.4.1.2 Seismicity model: The seismicity of each of the modeled sources is first
determined from past data available. The recurrence relationship is relating the size of
the past events in terms of Magnitude (M) and Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA).
2.4.1.3 Attenuation model of ground motion: This describes the transfer of

ground motions from the source to a particular site as a function of magnitude,
distance and soil conditions. Here, the peak ground acceleration is used to
characterize the ground motion.
2.4.1.4 Recurrence forecasting model: Various statistical models have been tested
innumerous research papers; however, for practical purposes, earthquakes are
considered to be random events, and the Poisson process is used, which implies
assumptions of stability and independence over time. Since hazard analysis defines
the occurrence of ground motions equal to or larger than a specified value, the
probability of exceedance is used.
16
2.4.2 Attenuation Law of Peak Ground Acceleration
The quantitative assessment of seismic hazard at any particular site within a region
requires' an attenuation law for the Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA). The maximum
ground motion to be expected in the site constitutes a crucial problem in earthquake
engineering. For Bangladesh, as in many other parts of the world, no PGA attenuation
law has been developed, due mainly to the shortage of strong motion data. However,
in order to assess the seismic hazard in this region, we have to adopt an attenuation
law from the literature. A great amount of PGA attenuation relationships, predicting
strong ground motions in terms of magnitudes, distance, site geology, and in some
cases other factors, using various models and data sets are established for different
parts of the world (Campbell, 1997). Some of the published attenuation laws are
presented in Table 2.1.
Table 2.1 Attenuation Laws
Author Law
Esteva y = 1230e3M(d+25)-2
Esteva & Rosenblueth (1964) y = 110e0.8Mr-1.6
Dugal (1989) y = 227 x 100.308M(d+30)-1.2
McGuire (1978) y = 0.030e0.89Mr-1.17 e-0.2S
where S=0 for rock and S=1 for alluvium
Katayama (1974) Logy=2.308-1 6371og (r+30) + 0.411 M
WoodwardClyde y = 276e(0.68M)*(r+c)-1.2
Consultants( 1978) C=0.864e0.463M
Ambraseys (1995) Logy=-1.43+0.245Ms-0.001 r-0.7861org
r=(d2+2.72)1/2
where y=PGA; M=magnitude; d=epicentral distance; r=hypocentral distance
2.4.3 Selection of Earthquakes Around the Site
To estimate the seismic hazard in any particular site within a region requires a
selection of earthquakes which affect significantly the value of the hazard output
Figure 2.9. However, there is no strict rule for selecting the maximum epicenter
distance to the site. A sensitivity study for different maximum epicenter distances, for
three sites in the region considered, was carried out to show the influence on the
seismic hazard evaluation. A small area around the site results in a smaller number of
earthquakes to be considered and some events outside the zone considered may affect
17
the hazard in the site. This, naturally, will decrease the data set for regression. On the
other hand, a too large area may include earthquakes which do not affect the seismic
hazard in the site and are thus useless. The findings show that for an epicenter
distance of 200 km and beyond, the b-coefficient of the Gutenberg-Richter formula is
relatively stable. Thus, it is assumed that significantly earthquakes are equally likely
to occur anywhere in the area of 200 km in radius surrounding the sites under
consideration. The evaluation of seismic hazard at a site is carried out only if the
number of earthquakes in the area considered (200 km radius) is larger than 10 and
the surface-wave magnitude is equal to or greater than 4.0 (Sarfuddin, 2001).
Figure 2.9: Earthquake occurred around in Bangladesh (Banglapedea, 2004)
2.4.4 Major Past Earthquakes and Affecting Areas of Indian Sub Continent
The seismic hazard is typically determined using a combination of seismological,

morphological, geological and geotechnical investigations, combined with the history
18
of earthquake in the region. Bolt analyzed different seismic sources in and around
Bangladesh and arrived at conclusions related to maximum likely earthquake
magnitude (Bolt, 1987). Bolt identified the following four major sources:
1. Assam fault zone

2. Tripura fault zone
3. Sub- Dauki fault zone
4. Bogra fault zone
Figure 2.10, shows distribution of faults and lineaments capable of producing

damaging earthquakes. The magnitudes of earthquake suggested by Bolt is given in
Table 2.2 are the maximum magnitude generated in these blocks as recorded in the
historical seismic catalogue. The historical seismic catalogue of the regions covers
approximately 250 years of (starting 1762) earthquake data. For example, the Assam
and Tripura fault zones contain significant faults capable of producing magnitude 8.6
and 8.0 earthquakes respectively in future. Similarly maximum magnitude of 7.5 in
Sub- Dauki fault zone and Bogra fault zones are not unlikely events (Bolt, 1987).
DAUKI FAULT
SYSTEM
TRIPURA
FAULT
SYSTEM
SUB DAUKI
FAULT
BOGRA FAULT
SYSTEM
Figure 2.10: Faults line in and around in Bangladesh (Ali, 1998)
19
Table 2.2 Significant Seismic Sources and maximum (Bolt, 1987).
Maximum Likely
Location
Earthquake Magnitude
A. Assam fault zone 8.0

B. Tripura fault zone 7.0
C. Sub-Dauki fault zone 7.3
D. Bogra fault zone 7.0
After a thorough review of available data, the recommended magnitudes of

Operational Basis Earthquakes and Maximum Credible Earthquakes are shown in
Table. 2.3 (Ali, 1998).
Table 2.3 Operational Basis Earthquake, Maximum Credible Earthquake and depth of
focus of earthquakes for different seismic sources (Ali, 1998).
Operational Basis Maximum Credible Depth of

Location
Earthquakes Earthquakes Focus (km)
Assam fault zone 8.0 (Richter Scale) 8.7 0-70

Tripura fault zone 7.0 8.0 0-70
Sub-Dauki fault zone 7.3 7.5 0-70
Bogra fault zone 7.0 7.5 0-70
2.4.5 Seismic Hazard Map of Bangladesh
From the above discussion and considering all past earthquakes seismic hazard map is
prepared for Bangladesh. It is divided into three parts i.e. low hazard, medium hazard
and high hazard. It is observed that North-East parts of Bangladesh are high seismic
hazard part in Figure 2.11.
20
Figure 2.11: Seismic hazard map of Bangladesh (www.asc.india.org)
2.5 Seismic Zoning of Bangladesh

Seismic zones express the proneness of a region to earthquake occurrence in the
historical past including the expectations in future. A region experiencing more
frequent and large earthquakes has a higher seismicity compared to one with less
frequent and small earthquakes. Both the temporal and spatial distributions of all
earthquakes, small and big, have to be systematically accounted for by determining
their past behavior to determine the future trend (Banglapedia, 2004).
The seismicity of various regions in a country is often described by a seismic zoning

map. Preparation of such a map is an important but difficult step, using data about
past earthquakes and taking into consideration the probability and frequency of
damaging earthquakes. It is common practice to carry out detailed seismic tectonic
studies of seismically active regions for the earthquake resistant design of buildings
21
and other structures. For proper guidance in the design of structures, it is essential to
have the full possible understanding of the seismicity and tectonics of the country.
The seismicity at a site is assessed partly by its distance from any fault and partly
from the frequency and size of shocks that have occurred in the past. The zoning of a
country depends primarily on the known seismic history of the region and its tectonic
features (Ashjal, 1997).
It is also the site of the major Dauki fault system along with numerous subsurface
active faults and a flexure zone to be called as Hinge zone. Bangladesh experienced
several historical great earthquakes during last the 100 years and has been affected by
small earthquakes occasionally (Hossain, 1989).
The seismicity of Bangladesh is deeply related with tectonic behavior in and around
Bangladesh which is caused by the sub-duction of the Indian plate below the Tibet
sub plate in the north. The northern and eastern parts of Bangladesh lie in the
seismically active zone. The region is also surrounded by most active seismic zones
which influence the seismicity of Bangladesh. The large earthquake events in India
adjoining Bangladesh caused damage in the region and hence seismicity of
Bangladesh should be considered regionally. On the basis of morph tectonic behavior
and seismicity a seismic zoning map of Bangladesh has been prepared and
Bangladesh has been divided into three generalized seismic zones (Hossain, 1989).
2.5.1 Regional Tectonics of Indian Sub-continent
Plate tectonics provide a physically simple mechanism for large-scale horizontal

motions of separate portions of the earth’s crust. One of the central concepts of plate
tectonics is that a small number of large plates of high strength lithosphere, move
rigidly with respect to one another at rates of 1 to 20 cm/year over the low-strength
asthenosphere. For the past 40 million years the Indian subcontinent has been pushing
northward against the Eurasian plate at a rate of 5 cm/year, giving rise to the severest
earthquakes and most diverse land forms known (Molnar, 1975). Figure 2.12, shows
India’s northward drift over the last 70 million years.
22
Figure 2.12: India’s northward-drift 70 million years (Molnar and Tapponner, 1975)
Recently it is pointed out that there is high possibility that a huge earthquake will
occur around the Himalayan region based on the difference between energy
accumulations in this region (Bilham et al. 2001). So there is a seismic gap that is
accumulating stress, and that a huge earthquake may occur someday when the stress
will be released. Figure 2.13, shows the estimated slip potential along the Himalaya
(Bilham et al 2001).
23
Figure 2.13: Estimated slip potential along the Himalaya (Bilham et al 2001)
2.5.2 Geological Setting
Bangladesh occupies a large pan of the Bengal basin which is bounded by the
peninsular shield area of Rajmahal Hills in the west, the Arakan-Yoma aniiclinorium
and the Naga-Lushai orogenic belts in the east, the Shillong plateau and the
Himalayan foredeep in the north and the Bay of Bengal in the south Figure 2.14. The
pensinsular shield mainly consists of the Archean basement complex and the late
Mesozoic volcanics of the Rajmahal Hills (Hossain and Akter, 1989). The Bay of
Bengal on the south provides with an extended area of deposition of huge sediments,
having an annual discharge of about 1 billion tons through the "swatch of no ground'
to form the longest fan of the world - the Bengal Fan (300 km long) stretched up to
latitude 7°S (Hossain, 2001).. Except for the eastern and northeastern regions
(Chiitagong, Chittagong hill tracts and part of Sylhet), Bangladesh is a flat basin
deposited by huge alluvium carried by the Ganges, Brahmaputra and Meghna rivers
which covers the area between the peninsular shield of India and Arakan-Yoma
folded belts burying the older sediments of the basin. The delta thus formed in the
subsided basin is attributed to be the largest delta of the world having an area of about
23,000 sq. miles which is about twice the size of the Mississippi delta (10,000 sq.
miles) of the USA and the Niger delta (11,130 sq. miles) of Nigeria (Coleman, 1969).
24
Figure 2.14: Geological map of Bangladesh and adjacent areas (GSB, 1990)
2.5.3 Tectonics and Geology
Tectonics and geology of Bangladesh and adjoining areas have been discussed in
details (Bolt, 1991 and Guta, 1978) and it is revealed in the above literatures that
stratigraphy, structure and surface geology of Bangladesh are related to its tectonic
evolution which started during late Cretaceous period when the northward moving
Indian plate collided with the Eurasian plate Figure 2.15.
Bangladesh
Figure 2.15: Geographical layout and tectonic plate boundaries at India (Murty, 2005)
25
The collision caused the northern extremity of Bay of Bengal to separate into gulfs of
Assam and Burma. During second collision at the end of Eocene time, the gulfs were
swallowed. The third collision which was occurred in Middle Miocene which was
intense due to folding occurred in the sediments of Chittagong, Sylhet and Assam.
The fourth and fifth collisions caused mainly vertical movements. The Shillong
Plateau and Mikir Hills formed a horst and Dinajpur shield a graben during the fourth
collision. The fifth collision uplifted the red clay tablelands (Hossain and Akter,
1983).
Geologically most of West Bengal of India and whole of Bangladesh are occupied by
the Bengal Basin, where the Precambrian basement lies more than 3 km below mean
sea level. The basin is bordered on the western side by the peninsula shield of India,
and on the eastern side by the Shillong Massif (Middlemiss, 1885)
2.5.4 Structure and Seismicity
Geological framework of Bangladesh and adjoining areas are surrounded by a number

of tectonic blocks which have produced damaging earthquakes in recent times. To the
east, the Tripura-Naga Organic belt is a zone of highly faulted tertiary deposits. In it
and along the borders of the Shilong massif occur a number of faults of which the
Sylhet fault, the Kopili fault, and the Dauki fault are worth mentioning (Mitra, 1971).
The 180km long Sylhet lineanent passing in a NE-SW direction across the Sylhet
district forms the surface expressiun of a deep-seated, high angle reverse fault called
the Sylhet fault. The fault has a dip of 70° towards South - East and is active
seismically at present. The July 8, 1918 Srimangal earthquake located near the Sylhet
fault originated due to subsidence along the southern side of a normal fault trending
WNW - ESE through Balisera valley in Sylhet. The depth of hypocentre estimated for
this earthquake was 15 km (Hoque and Watney, 1982).
To the northwest part of Bangladesh a northeast -southwest tending fault called Bogra
fault has recently been discovered. This fault is located to the west of the Jamuna river
and south of Bogra town and is assumed to originate in the nasement complex and
extend into the Pleistocene layers upto depths of almost 300m. The Bogra fault
system may be associated with flezure of the basin along its north western margin.
It is running in N-S direction through Longitude 90° E the Jamuna lineament cuts
through all eastern Himalayan structures. It is the surtace expression of a deep-seated
sub vertical fault called Jamuna fault. This fault might have played active role towards
the evolution of the Meghalaya plateau during recent times (Bolt,1991 and Ali, 1998).
26
To the north east of the country the Shillong plateau is separated from the Sylhet plain
by E-W trending Dauki fault. Although a number of epicenters occur in the plateau
proper, only a few epicenters appear on or close to he Dauki fault, including thereby
that this fault is relatively inactive during the recent times. Maximum depth of
hypocenter of earthquakes in the plateau is only 60 km. These earthquakes are caused
by upward material transport from greater depth which produces tensional stress in
the crustal rocks. Considering geology and tectonics of Bangladesh and neighborhood
five tectonic blocks can be identified which have been active in producing damaging
earthquakes (Ali, 1998).
2.5.5 Vulnerability of Cities
By close examination of the seismicity maps and studies of above section it is

observed that Northeastern cities of Bangladesh are more vulnerable to earthquake
hazards than the central, eastern, southern, south western and western cities. The most
vulnerable cities in the northeast are Mymensingh, Kishorognj and Sylhet. The north
western, central and southeastern cities which include Dinajpur, Rangpur Dhaka,
Comilia, Chittagong and Cox's Bazar are comparatively less vulnerable than the afore
mentioned cities in Figure 2.11. The southwestern and western cities are the least
vulnerable and include cities: like Rajshahi, Faridpur, Khulna and Barishal etc (Ali,
1998).
Figure 2.16: Vulnerability of earthquakes risk in Bangladesh (Banglapedia, 2008)
27
2.5.6 Seismic Zoning and Zone Coefficients
The first seismic zoning map of the subcontinent was compiled by the Geological
Survey of India in 1935. The Bangladesh Meteorological Department adopted a
seismic zoning map in 1972. In 1977, the Government of Bangladesh constituted a
Committee of Experts to examine the seismic problem and make appropriate
recommendations. The Committee proposed a zoning map of Bangladesh in the same
year (Banglapedia, 2004).
The seismic zones and the zone coefficients may be determined from the earthquake
magnitude for various return periods and the acceleration attention relationship. It is
required that for design of ordinary structures, seismic ground motion having 10%
probability of being exceeded in design life of a structure (50 years) is considered
critical. An earthquake having 200 year return period originating in Sub-Dauki zone
have epicentral acceleration of more than 1.0g but at 50 kilometer the acceleration
shall be reduced to as low as 0.3g. In the Boguar fault system earthquakes having 200
year return period have a value of only 7.3 and at 50 kilometer distance, the
acceleration shall be reduced to a value of less than 0.1 g. The pattern of the ground
surface acceleration contours having 200 year return period presented in Figure 2.17
forms the basis of seismic zoning of Bangladesh (Hattori, 1979).
Figure 2.17: Seismic map showing the 200 year ground surface acceleration contours
in Bangladesh and neighborhood (Hattori, 1979)
28
In the light of the outcome of these studies, Bangladesh may still be divided into three
seismic zones, namely zone 3, zone 2 and zone 1 with zone 3 and zone 1 being the
most and least severe respectively. For the present zoning north, northeastern part of
greater Rangpur district has been included in zone 3 as this area is close to the Jarnuna
fault where the Dhubri earthquake of 1930 occurred causing great damage. Zone 2
and zone 1 boundary has been taken as the 1.0g contour with some modification of its
location. In Tripura fault zone, magnitude (mb) 8.0 earthquakes is possible in 200
year return period. Earthquake of such shall affect Chittagong and adjoining areas
producing ground acceleration of 0.1 g or more. Therefore 0.1g contours has been
extended to include Chittagong and adjoining areas in southeast part of Bangladesh.
In the northwest this contour has been extended to include parts of Rangpur and
Bogra district not included in zone 3. The proposed zoning map is shown in Figure
2.18.
For determining zone coefficients, comparisons of acceleration contour maps with
earthquake risk maps of the USA indicate that Bangladesh is comparatively less
seismic than California. This indicates that lower values of zone coefficients are
appropriate in Bangladesh. The above comparison and also consideration of 1979
code, issoseismal maps of past earthquakes indicates chat zone coefficient values of
0.25, 0.15 and 0.075 for zone 3, zone 2 and zone I respectively would be appropriate
(Ali, 1998). The occurrence of earthquakes in an earthquake prone region cannot be
prevented. Rather, all that could be done is to make a prediction and issue a warning
for minimizing loss of life and property. It is also suggested to follow seismic code in
the analysis of seismic load. Although precise prediction is not always possible, an
acceptable valid prediction of an earthquake will certainly minimize the loss of life
and property (Banglapedia, 2004).
29
Figure 2.18: Seismic zoning map of Bangladesh (BNBC, 1993)
30
2.6 Structural System and Response Modification Coefficient
A building frame system is a system in which gravity load is carried primarily by a

frame supported on columns rather than by bearing wall. Some minor portions of the
gravity load may be carried on bearing walls but the amount so carried should not
represent more than few percent of the building area. Lateral resistance is provided by
nonbearing structural walls or braced frames (BNBC, 1993 and ASCE, 2003).
From the structural engineer’s point of view the determination of structural system of
a building would ideally involve only the selection and arrangement of the major
structural elements to resist most efficiently the various combinations of gravity and
horizontal loading. In reality, however, the choice of structural system is usually
strongly influenced by other than structural considerations. There are different types
of structural system based on the configuration of the structural elements which will
be described in different section in this chapter. It is to be highlighted here that the
structural systems are also related with height and seismic zone. The taller and more
slender a building the more important the structural factors become and the more
necessary it is to choose an appropriate structural system. Earthquake force is related
with structural system and it is depended on R (Ghosh, 2004).
R factor is a ratio of the forces that would develop in the structure under a specified
ground motion if the behavior were entirely elastic compared to the prescribed design
forces at the level of significant yield (ATC, 1978). In US seismic design codes, the
coefficient R is intended to account for ductility, system over strength and energy
dissipation through the soil-foundation system (Masud, 2007). It is a measure of the
ability of the structure to withstand earthquake motions without collapse. Its
magnitude depends on the type and material of the structure, the possibility of failure
of the vertical load system, the degree of redundancy of the system that would allow
some localized failures without overall failure. The ability of the secondary system is
the case of dual systems, to stabilize the building when the primary system suffers
significant damage.
31
2.6.1 Bearing Wall System
A structural system having bearing wall or braces systems without a complete vertical
load carrying frame is to support gravity loads Figure 2.19. Resistance to lateral loads
is provides by shear walls or braced frame. A structural system without an essentially
complete space frame providing support for gravity loads. Bearing walls provide
support for all or most gravity loads. Resistance to lateral load is provided by the
same bearing walls acting as shear walls. In seismic zones 2 and 3, the shear walls
must be specially detailed. In lower seismic zones, there are no special detailing
requirements for shear walls (BNBC, 1993 Ghosh and Domel, 1992).
The equation for design base shear contains a parameter R which affects the reduction
from elastic response seismic force to design seismic force levels. R would
correspond more or less to elastic response seismic forces. By contrast, the Moment-
resisting frame system with SMRF, the dual system with specially detailed shear
walls and SMRF, the building frame system, and the bearing wall system are designed
for R values of 8, 6 and 4, respectively. Thus, the bearing wall system, the building
frame system, and the remaining two systems are designed for one-half, one-third,
and one-quarter of the elastic response force level, respectively (BNBC, 1993 Ghosh
and Domel,1992).
Figure 2.19: Bearing wall system
32
2.6.2 Building Frame System
Building frame system is a structural system with an essentially complete space frame
providing support for gravity loads Figure 2.20. Resistance to lateral loads is provided
by shear walls or braced frame separately. In seismic zones 2 and 3, the shear walls
must be specially detailed. In lower seismic zones, there are no special detailing
requirements for the shear walls. It should be noted that the concept of the building
frame system also becomes somewhat meaningless in seismic zone 1. In those
regions, making the frames part of the lateral force-resisting system does not involve
any special ductility details for the frame members. Thus, to design the shear walls to
resist 100% of the design base shear does not make economic or practical sense. As
mentioned earlier, in seismic zone 1, structures containing shear walls and frames
should be designed as shear wall-frame interactive systems (BNBC, 1993 Ghosh and
Domel 1992).
The seismic safety of the building frame system is totally dependent on good-faith
satisfaction of the so-called deformation compatibility requirements. The amplified
elastic displacement of the lateral force resisting system is supposed to provide an
estimate of the actual displacement of the entire structure caused by an earthquake of
intensity anticipated by the code. If under the estimated earthquake-induced
displacements, the gravity loads would cause inelasticity (exceedance of design
moment capacity) in any structural element initially designed for gravity only, that
structural element must also be detailed for inelastic deformability.
Figure 2.20: Building frame system
33
If satisfaction of the deformation compatibility requirement would require that
ductility details be provided in structural members originally designed for gravity
only, then the engineer ought to review his original decision, and consider making
such structural elements or subsystems part of the lateral force resisting system. In
other words, he should consider an alternative structural system for his building
(BNBC, 1993 Ghosh and Domel 1992).
2.6.3 Moment - Resisting Frame System
Moment - Resisting Frame System is A structural system with an essentially complete

space frame providing support for gravity loads. Moment-resisting frames Figure
2.21, provide resistance to lateral loads primarily by flexural action of members
(BNBC, 1993). Moment resisting frame system may be classified as one of the
following types:
a) Special moment resisting frame (SMRF)

b) Intermediate moment resisting Frames (IMRF)
c) Ordinary moment resisting Frames (OMRF)
In seismic zone 1, the moment-resisting frames can be ordinary moment-resisting

frames (OMRF). In seismic zone 2, reinforced concrete frames resisting forces in-
duced by earthquake motions must be, at a minimum, intermediate moment-resisting
frames (IMRF).
Figure 2.21: Moment-resisting frame system
34
In seismic zones 2 and 3, reinforced concrete frames resisting forces induced by
earthquake motions must be special moment-resisting frames (SMRF).The framing
system, IMRF and SMRF shall have special detailing to provide ductile behavior for
concrete structure (BNBC, 1993). OMRF need conform to the ductility requirements.
2.6.4 Dual System
A dual system consists of a three-dimensional space frame made up of columns and
beams that provide primary support for the gravity loads Figure 2.22. The moment
frame is required to be capable of resisting at least 25 percent of the specified seismic
force (BNBC, 1993). Normally the moment frame would be a part of the basic space
frame. The walls or bracing acting together with the moment frame must be capable
of resisting all of the design seismic force.
The frame and shear walls or braced frames must resist the prescribed lateral seismic
force in accordance with their relative rigidities considering fully the interaction of the
walls or braced frames and the moment frames as a single system. This analysis must
be made in accordance with the principles of structural mechanics considering the
relative rigidities of the elements and torsion in the system. Deformations imposed
upon members of the moment frame by their interaction with the shear walls or
braced frames must be considered in this analysis. It should be noted that the concept
of the dual system really loses its validity in seismic zones 1, because it is
questionable whether the OMRF can act as a backup to the ordinarily detailed shear
wall, the inelastic deform abilities of both systems being comparable. It is common
practice in the lower seismic zones to design structures containing shear walls and
frames.
35
Figure 2.22: Dual structural system
2.6.5 Special Structural System
A structural system not defined above and specially designed to carry the lateral
loads, such as the exterior columns and beams are spaced so closely that the facade
has the appearance of a wall with perforated window openings. The entire building
acts as a hollow tube cantilevering out of the ground. The interior core increases the
stiffness of the building by sharing the loads with the facade tube (BNBC, 1993). The
example of this type structures are tube-in-tube, bundled tube etc.
2.6.6 The Evolution of Seismic Codes and R
The Great San Francisco Earthquake of 1906 marks the beginning of earthquake
engineering in the U.S. (Atkinson and Kiland, 2004). Over the next two decades,
several seismic events rocked the state of California, and consequently the Structural
Engineers Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) was founded in 1929
(Atkinson and Kiland, 2004). The objective of the SEAOSC were:
“To advance the science of structural engineering; to assist the public in obtaining
dependable structural engineering services; to encourage engineering education; to
maintain the honor and dignity of the profession and to enlighten the public with
regard to the province of the structural engineer” (Atkinson and Kiland 2004).
36
SEAOSC later merged with a similar group from Northern California and the
Structural Engineers Association of California (SEAOC) was formed in late 1931
(Atkinson and Kiland, 2004). The first introduction of a seismic lateral force equation
in 1927 in the Uniform Building Code (UBC), a regional model building code. After
each major earthquake, engineers and researchers studied building behavior and
failures and changed the building codes based on their observations. The beginning of
modern seismic design methodology is found in the first edition of the SEAOC
Recommended Lateral Force Requirements and Commentary (Blue Book) in 1959
(SEAOC, 2007) and was significantly changed in 1978 with the publication of
Applied Technology Council(ATC) 3-06, tentative Provisions for the Development of
Seismic Regulations for Buildings. ATC 3-06 recommended seismic provisions use a
R, and change the seismic load from stress level to strength level. Since 1978, seismic
design methodology and R have continued to change. Currently seismic design forces
(seismic base shear) are determined by dividing lateral seismic forces occurring at the
base of an elastically responding structure by a response modification factor (ATC,
1955). Seismic design has developed through many changes in the calculation of the
prescribed lateral forces, base shear and R to arrive at the current method.
Initially seismic design load (base shear) was calculated without considering the
structural system (Kessler, 2010). Afterward it is found that it is related with
structural system as well as response modification coefficient. The development of
seismic design load and R based on different codes will be discussed in following
sections. A comparison is shown among different Seismic codes with the values of R.
2.6.6.1 Seismic Design Prior to the Blue Book

SEAOC published the first Blue Book in 1959. Before the Blue Book was published
several code writing bodies were in existence and covered different regions of the
U.S., but none considered seismic design until after the 1925 Santa Barbara,
California earthquake. These regional building codes had a general geographic area of
use and, depending on experience; engineers considered the importance of seismic
design very differently even within the same region. The three major model building
codes UBC and BOCA are mainly used for design seismic load (Beavers, 2002). The
37
UBC and the National Building Code (BOCA) will be discussed in detail in later
subsections. Other authoritative bodies, like the Atomic Energy Commission,
American National Standards Institute (ANSI) the American Society of Civil
Engineers (ASCE), ATC, and the Environmental Protection Agency also developed
code documents related to seismic design.
2.6.6.2 UBC (Uniform Building Code)

The International Conference of Building Officials (ICBO) was founded in 1922. The
UBC addressed seismic design in “Section 2312- Earthquake Regulations” written
into the main code body, beginning in 1927 after the 1925 Santa Barbara earthquake
(Beavers, 2002).In 1943, the first jurisdiction to adopt UBC provisions was the city of
Los Angeles (Atkinson and Kiland,2004). The UBC regulations calculated lateral
force without considering structural system effects (Line, 2006). In the 1927 UBC the
lateral force was a constant percentage of building weight, as shown in Equation 2.11
(Beavers, 2002). UBC has prescribed the value of R for various structural systems
which is given in Appendix A.
F=0.075W ( 2.1 )
Where: F = the force in pounds

W = the total dead load tributary to the point under consideration in
pounds
In 1935, the UBC introduced a horizontal force factor in lieu of the constant
percentage of building weight. The horizontal force factor depended on the type of
structural element, the geographic location. Equation 2.12 gives the 1935 UBC
equation for lateral force. This force was the required lateral strength of the structural
element being designed.
F=CW ( 2.2 )
Where: C = horizontal force factor

W = the total dead load tributary to the point under consideration in pounds
38
2.6.6.3 The National Building Code
The Building Officials and Code Administrators International was founded in 1915.
The National Building Code published by this organization is known as the BOCA
model building code and was predominantly used in the upper midwest and
northeastern U.S. In 1950, the BOCA code adopted a seismic design method much
like the 1927 UBC method. In this method, the lateral force at the level of interest are
calculated as a percentage of building weight, with percentages varying based on
building height.
2.6.6.4 Standards from ANSI and ASCE
In 1945, ANSI published ANSI A58.1 (Beavers, 2002), the first national standard to
consider earthquake loads. The lateral force equation was the same as Equation 2.2,
but the C values differed from those in the 1958 UBC. C within ANSI A58.1 varied
from 0.1 for each story in a building to 1.0 for components of the structure, depending
on the member being designed (Beavers, 2002). The Lateral Forces of Earthquake and
Wind, which was eventually, incorporated into the ASCE 7- Minimum Design Loads
for Buildings and Other Structures, replaced the ANSI standard in 1952. This standard
is the first to use a dynamic approach to seismic design (Beavers, 2002). ASCE
introduced the base shear equation, 2.3, in lieu of the lateral force equations given in
ANSI A58.1, the UBC and BOCA. A function relating to the inverse of the structure’s
natural period defined C (Beavers, 2002). The model building codes did not adopt this
concept until 1961.
V=CW ( 2.3 )
Where: V = lateral seismic base shear in pounds
C = 1/T
T = structure’s natural period
W = the total dead load tributary to the point under consideration in pounds
2.6.6.5 Stress versus Strength Design (1987-1997)
The ATC-3 06 method determined a strength level earthquake load. At the time, the
regional codes determined design loads at the working stress (WSD) level; SEAOC
developed a method similar to ATC-3 06 but kept the WSD method for the 1988 Blue
Book. The response modification factor for WSD was called Rw. Regional codes
39
continued to use this method until 1997 when the UBC adopted strength level
earthquake forces, incorporating R into seismic design. In 1995, the ATC published
Structural Response Modification Factors, ATC-19. ATC-19 provided a review of the
R factors and redefined the term using three characteristics of the structural system,
strength, ductility and redundancy. ATC-19 intended to stimulate discussion and
further research on the R factors and how the code should use characteristics of the
structural system to determine the coefficient by providing a quantifiable definition.
In 1997, ICBO joined BOCA and SBCCI to form the ICC, which uses strength level
design (Kessler, 2010).
IBC (International Building Code)
The IBC began in 1997 with the merger of the ICBO, BOCA and SBCCI. In 2000, the
IBC published the first code resulting from the merger, the 2000 edition of the
International Building Code (IBC). The earthquake regulations of the IBC 2000
differed from the 1997 UBC and were based on the 1997 NEHRP Provisions.
Beginning with the 2006 IBC, the ASCE 7-05 is adopted by reference for determining
earthquake forces, though some information is still contained in the IBC. The IBC
2006 offers an alternative method for determining site class, but permits the user to
forgo its requirements if the ASCE 7-05 is used. IBC and NEHRP have been given
the value of R for various structural systems which is given in Appendix A.
ASCE-7 (American Society of Civil Engineers)
The ASCE 7-98 had incorporated many of the recommendations of the ATC-3 06 and
subsequent NEHRP documents. In 1998 ASCE 7 published the values of R for
different structural system from their organization given in Appendix A. Here it is to
be mentioned that it was their first publication. Afterwards some states, such as
California, still imposed stricter requirements, or referenced other standards for
determining earthquake forces, rather than adopting the IBC at the local level.
California adopted the Building Construction and Safety Code 2003, NFP 5000-03 as
the model building code for seismic design, but reversed the decision in 2006 when
the state adopted the IBC as the model building code.
40
ASCE 7-98 was based seismic base shear on the 1997 NEHRP Provisions. Beginning
with the 2006 IBC, the ASCE 7-05 is adopted by reference for determining
earthquake forces, though some information is still contained in the IBC. The IBC
2006 offers an alternative method for determining site class, but permits the user to
forgo its requirements if the ASCE 7-05 is used. ASCE also published the value of R
factor jointly with IBC in 2005 (Appendix A). It was second publication from this
organization.
FEMA-350 and ATC-63(2009-Present)
In September of 2004, FEMA awarded a contract to ATC to recommend method for

quantifying the building system seismic performance factors and response parameters
used in seismic design. As stated previously, current values of R listed in NEHRP and
ASCE 7-05 use the judgment of designers and limited qualitative comparisons to
other similar systems. The NEHRP Provisions include more than 75 structural
systems, each with an assigned R factor based on expert judgment, but many have
never been tested or evaluated after major seismic events. ATC-306 has published the
value of R based on structural system which is given in Appendix A.
2.6.6.6 BNBC-1993
BNBC was published in the year of 1993 jointly by Housing and Building Research
Institute and Bangladesh Standards and Testing Institution. This code also evaluated
the value of R for different structural system which is given in Appendix D. It is to be
highlighted here that for the calculation of base shears in this study values of R are
taken from this code Appendix D.
2.7 Seismic Effect and Force on Structure
The seismic effect on structure during earthquakes depends critically on its overall
shape, size, location of epicenter and geometry, in addition to how the earthquake
forces are carried to the ground. It is observed from the past earthquakes that all
structural elements do not respond equally. It mainly depends on their location in that
structure. When the structures are twisting during earthquake, inertia forces are
developed and it flows in different structural member. It is found that due to seismic
effect on structure, seismic loads are developed on it. This loads are depended on
various factors of structure and its surrounding (weight, height, structural system, soil
41
condition). Effects of inertia forces and calculation of forces in various stories level
are given in following section.
2.7.1 Inertia Forces in Structures
Earthquake causes shaking of the ground. So a building resting on it will experience
motion at its base. From Newton’s First Law of Motion, even though the base of the
building moves with the ground, the roof has a tendency to stay in its original
position. But since the walls and columns are connected to it, they drag the roof along
with them. This tendency to continue to remain in the previous position is known as
inertia. In the building, since the walls or columns are flexible, the motion of the roof
is different from that of the ground.
Let us a building whose roof is supported on columns. Similarly, when the ground
moves, even the building is thrown backwards, and the roof experiences a force,
called inertia force. If the roof has a mass M and experiences an acceleration a, then
from Newton’s Second Law of Motion, the inertia force FI is mass M times
acceleration a, and its direction is opposite to that of the acceleration. Clearly, more
mass means higher inertia force. Therefore, lighter buildings sustain the earthquake
shaking better.
2.7.2 Effect of Deformations in Structures
The inertia force experienced by the roof is transferred to the ground via the columns,
causing forces in columns. These forces generated in the columns can also be
understood in another way. During earthquake shaking, the columns undergo relative
movement between their ends. In Figure 2.23, this movement is shown as quantity u
between the roof and the ground. But, given a free option, columns would like to
come back to the straight vertical position, i.e., columns resist deformations.
42
Figure 2.23: Inertia force and relative motion within a building. (Murty, 2005)
In the straight vertical position, the columns carry no horizontal earthquake force
through them. But, when forced to bend, they develop internal forces. The larger is
the relative horizontal displacement u between the top and bottom of the column, the
larger this internal force in columns. Also, the stiffer the columns are (bigger is the
column size), larger is this force. For this reason, these internal forces in the columns
are called stiffness forces. In fact, the stiffness force in a column is the column
stiffness times the relative displacement between its ends (Murty, 2005).
2.7.3 Horizontal and Vertical Shaking
Earthquake causes shaking of the ground in all three directions – along the two
horizontal directions(X and Y, say), and the vertical direction (Z, say) Figure 2.24.
Also, during the earthquake, the ground shakes randomly back and forth (- and +)
along each of these X, Y and Z directions. All structures are primarily designed to
carry the gravity loads, i.e., they are designed for a force equal to the mass M (this
includes mass due to own weight and imposed loads) times the acceleration due to
gravity g acting in the vertical downward direction (-Z). The downward force Mg is
called the gravity load. The vertical acceleration during ground shaking either adds to
or subtracts from the acceleration due to gravity. Since factors of safety are used in
the design of structures to resist the gravity loads, usually most structures tend to be
adequate against vertical shaking.
43
Figure 2.24: Principal direction of force in a building (Murty, 2005)
However, horizontal shaking along X and Y directions (both + and – directions of

each) remains a concern. Structures designed for gravity loads, in general, may not be
able to safely sustain the effects of horizontal earthquake shaking. Hence, it is
necessary to ensure adequacy of the structures against horizontal earthquake effects
(Murty, 2005).
2.7.4 Flow of Inertia Forces to Foundations
Under horizontal shaking of the ground, horizontal inertia forces are generated at
level of the mass of the structure (usually situated at the floor levels). These lateral
inertia forces are transferred by the floor slab to the walls or columns, to the
foundations, and finally to the soil system underneath. So, each of these structural
elements (floor slabs, walls, columns, and foundations) and the connections between
them must be designed to safely transfer these inertia forces through them.
44
Walls or columns are the most critical elements in transferring the inertia forces. But,
in traditional construction, floor slabs and beams receive more care and attention
during design and construction, than walls and columns. Walls are relatively thin and
often made of brittle material like masonry.
2.7.5 Response of Tall Buildings
In general, tall buildings respond to seismic motion somewhat differently than low-
rise buildings. The magnitude of inertia forces induced in an earthquake depends on
the building mass, ground acceleration in Figure 2.25, the nature of foundation and
the dynamic characteristics of the structure. If a building and its foundation were
infinitely rigid, it would have the same acceleration as the ground. The inertia force F
for a given ground acceleration a given by Newton's Law F =Ma, where M is the
building mass. For a structure that deforms only slightly, thereby-absorbing some
energy, the force F tends to be less than the product of mass and ground acceleration.
Tall buildings are invariably more flexible than low-rise buildings, and in general
experience accelerations much less than low-rise buildings (Schuller, 1977).
Figure 2.25: Response of tall building during earthquake
When the ground shakes, the base of building moves with the ground, and the
building swings back-and-forth. If the building were rigid, then every point in it
would move by the same amount as the ground. But, most buildings are flexible, and
different parts move back-and-forth by different amounts. The building will oscillate
45
back-and-forth horizontally and after some time comes back to the original position,
these oscillations are periodic. The time is taken (in seconds) for each complete cycle
of oscillation is the same and is called Fundamental Natural Period T of the building.
Value of T depends on the building flexibility and mass; more the flexibility, the
longer is the T, and more the mass, the longer is the T. In general, taller buildings are
more flexible and have larger mass, and therefore have a longer T. On the contrary,
low- to medium-rise buildings generally have shorter T (Murty, 2005).
2.7.6 Seismic Forces
Seismic forces are generated by the dead weight of the building. These inertial forces
are essentially created by the shaking of the building foundation by a seismic
disturbance. The horizontal components of the inertial forces have a more significant
effect on a building than the vertical components; consequently, earthquake resistant
design concentrates more on the effects of the horizontal forces (Murty, 2005).
The general philosophy of earthquake-resistant design is to allow some structural and

nonstructural damage of a building subjected to the design ground motion while
minimizing the hazard to life. This is to be achieved by utilizing the inelastic
deformability of the structure and allowing dissipation of the earthquake energy. For
ground motions in excess of the design levels, structural damage may be great, but the
likelihood of collapse will be low (Bolt, 1991). It is to be mentioned that the seismic
forces are applied at the center of mass at each floor level, which for one reason or
another is at a different location than the center of rigidity Figure 2.26.
Opening
Center of mass Center of

(CM) rigidity (CR)
Figure 2.26: Center of mass (CM) and center of rigidity (CR) at different locations.
46
2.7.7 Analysis of Seismic Force
Seismic force analysis is a subset of structural analysis and is the calculation of the
response of a building (or nonbuilding) structure to earthquakes. It is part of the
process of structural design, earthquake engineering or structural assessment and
retrofit (see structural engineering) in regions where earthquakes are prevalent.
Two methods for determining the seismic forces on a building: the equivalent lateral
force (ELF) procedure and the Dynamic Response Method. Both Procedures consider
lateral forces action on the building in the direction of the ground motion; the main
difference lies in the magnitude and distribution of the lateral forces over the height of
the building. The applicability of these methods depends on the structural system, soil
condition and configuration of the structure (Wikipedia.org, 2005).
For low-rise construction with building heights not greater than 65ft and periods less
than 0.7 seconds, use of the more accurate MA procedure is seldom required. The
ELF procedure, which is simple to use, is applicable in most cases, unless special
requirements warrant a more refined analysis. The discussion below will mainly focus
on the determination of the seismic forces using the ELF procedure (Bolt, 1991).
2.7.7.1 The dynamic Response Method
A mathematical model of the physical structure shall represent the spatial distribution
of stiffness and other properties of the structure which is adequate to provide a
complete load path capable of transferring all loads and forces from their points of
origin to the load-resisting dynamic analysis of the structure shall be based on an
established principle of mechanics using mathematical elements for obtaining various
load effects. For dynamic analysis, mathematical model shall also incorporate the
appropriately distributed mass and damping properties of the structure adequate for
the determination of the significant features of its dynamic response. A three
dimensional model shall be used to represent a structure having highly irregular plan
configuration (BNBC, 1993).
47
2.7.7.2 Time History Analysis
Earthquake excitation is time dependent, highly irregular and arbitrary in nature.

Usually earthquake excitation in the form of acceleration or displacement or velocity
is recorded for a time interval of 0.02 to 0.05 seconds. In dynamic analysis procedure
the response of a structure at every time interval is recorded for the whole earthquake
period and the statistical average is represented. Because of its inherent complexities
of the procedure and nondeterministic nature of the input ground motion, the analysis
procedure has not become popular in the design houses for designing of the structures.
Until recently, Bangladesh did not have strong motion data recording centre. Few
instruments for strong motion data recording have been instrumented in Jamuna
multi-purpose bridge and in Dhaka University.
2.7.7.3 Equivalent Static Load Method
In this method the dynamic earthquake effect is represented by an equivalent static
load at different levels proportion to mass at the led Earthquake load is a dynamic
load. Due to earthquake load, a structure librates III different mode shapes and load
on the structure and its intensities and direction is dependent on the mode shapes.
Equivalent Static load method is an assumption of linear mode shape for the first
mode of the structure. It is basically calculation of base shear from an earthquake load
and its comparison with the base shear capacity of the building (BNBC, 1993).
Calculation of Base Shear

Total design base shear, denoted by V, in a given direction is determined from the
following relation.
ZIC
V=
R W ( 2.4 )
The terms in the right hand side of the equation 2.4 may be explained as below.
48
Zone Coefficient, Z
This is the coefficient that represents the earthquake severity of the regions.
Bangladesh is divided into three zones of different earthquake severity. These are
defined in Figure 2.18 given in chapter two in a seismic zoning map in the Code. The
zoning coefficients of the different zones are given in Appendix B. The values of this
coefficient is considered to represent the effective peak ground acceleration
(associated with an earthquake that has a 10% probability of being exceeded in 40
years) expressed as a fraction of the acceleration due to gravity.
Structure Importance Coefficient, I
This is the coefficient that accounts the importance of structure for post earthquake
activities. This coefficient is introduced from the experience of the previous
earthquakes when destruction of hospital and other important installation which has
an important role in post earthquake disaster management results in additional
encumbrance. Now, some structures like hospital, fire station, police station etc are
designed giving more importance so that possibilities of these structures to survive in
earthquake increase. Values of structural importance coefficient are given in
Appendix C. The earthquake lateral force is multiplied by some factor called
Structure Importance Coefficient and are designed for a higher level of force so that
the possibility of these structure being undamaged during an earthquake remains
higher.
Seismic Dead Load, W

This is the seismic weight of the structure that participates in earthquake response of
the structure. The total seismic dead load of a building and applicable portions of
other loads. It represents the total mass of the building and includes the weights of
structural slabs, beams, columns and walls, non-structural components such as floor
topping, roofing, fire-proofing material, fixed electrical and mechanical equipment,
partitions and ceilings. When partition locations are subject to change as in office
buildings, a uniform distributed dead load of at least 10 psf of floor area is used in
calculating W. Typical miscellaneous items such as ducts, piping and conduits can be
covered by using an additional 2 to 5 psf. In storage areas, 25 percent of the design
live load is included in the seismic weight W. In areas of heavy snow, a load of 30 psf
should be used where the snow load is greater than 30 psf. However it may be
49
reduced to as little as 7.5 psf when approved by building officials. In addition to
determining the overall weight W, it is necessary to evaluate tributary weight at each
floor for both vertical and horizontal distribution of loads (Schueller, 1977).
Response Modification Factor, R
Earthquake force is reduced by dividing this factor. This factor accounts for the
structure's ability to undergo inelastic deformation during earthquake. This factor
depends on structure type, its damping properties and ductility. R is a measure of the
capacity of the structural system to absorb energy in the inelastic range through
ductility and redundancy. R is based primarily on the performance of similar systems
in past earthquakes. Different values of R for various structural systems are given in
Appendix D.
Numeric Coefficient, C
This is the coefficient that accounts for fundamental period of the structure and soil
property or the structure site. The value of C need not exceed 2.75 and this value may
be used for any structure without regard to soil type structure period. Except for those
requirements where code prescribed forces are scaled up by 0.375 R the minimum
value of the ratio C/R shall be 0.075 (BNBC, 1993).
1.253
C is calculated as Error! Bookmark
2/3not defined. C=
T
( 2.5 )
Where S is the Site coefficient depending on the characteristics of the soil at the site
as described in the Table 6.2.2.5 of BNBC, 1993 and T is the fundamental period of
the structure. Fundamental period of the structure is calculated by some empirical
formula as
T = C t (h n ) ( 2.6 )
Where h n = Total height of the structure above the base.
C t = a coefficient that depends on the structure type and given in the

code.
50
Vertical Distribution of Lateral Forces
In the absence of a more rigorous procedure the total lateral force, which is the base
shear V, shall be distributed along the height of the structure in accordance with
equation (2.8) (2.9) and (2.10).
n
V= F t +.• F i ( 2.7 )
i=1
Where, F i = Lateral force applied at storey level –i and

Ft = Concentrated lateral force considered at the top of the building in
addition to the force Fn.
The concentrated force F t acting at the top of the building shall be determined as
follows:
Ft = 0.07TV ≥ 0.25V when T>0.7 Second ( 2.8 )
Ft = 0.0 when T < 0.7 Second ( 2.9 )
The remaining portion of the base shear (V- F t ) shall be distributed over the height of
the building including level –n according to the relation :
Fx = (V-nF t ) w x h x ( 2.10 )
• wihi
i =1
At each storey level-x, the force F x shall be applied over the area of the building in
proportion to the mass distribution at that level Figure 2.27.
Fn Ft
N
hn
Fx
x
hx
51
Figure 2.27: Distribution of lateral forces in multistory building.
2.8 Seismic Design Philosophy and Detailing
The engineers do not attempt to make earthquake proof buildings that will not get
damaged even during the rare but strong earthquake; such buildings will be too robust
and also too expensive. Instead, the engineering intention is to make buildings
earthquake resistant; such buildings resist the effects of ground shaking, although they
may get damaged severely but would not collapse during the strong earthquake. It is
mainly depend on proper design and detailing combination of load, compressive
strength and reinforcement used in structure. Thus, safety of people and contents is
assured in earthquake-resistant buildings, and thereby a disaster is avoided. This is a
major objective of seismic design codes throughout the world. The earthquake design
philosophy may be summarized as follows (Wikipedia.org, 2005).
a) Under minor but frequent shaking, the main members of the building
that carry vertical and horizontal forces should not be damaged; however
building parts that do not carry load may sustain repairable damage.
b) Under moderate but occasional shaking, the main members may

sustain repairable damage, while the other parts of the building may be
damaged such that they may even have to be replaced after the earthquake.
c) Under strong but rare shaking, the main member may sustain severe
(even irreparable) damage, but the building should not collapse.
The seismic design forces determined by the methods in previous section are only a
fraction of the actual forces that a structure may experience during an earthquake. For
design purposes, the seismic forces are reduced since it is impractical as well as
uneconomical to design a structure for the maximum probable forces. In order to
prevent collapse, structures must be detailed so that they are able to dissipate the
excess earthquake energy through inelastic deformations. In general, the detailing
requirements of the structural members in a building depend on the Seismic
Performance Category (Bolt, 1991).
52
Detailing of the structure is an integral and important part of the seismic design
process. For reinforced concrete, structural detailing centers around arrangement of
the reinforcing bars. There must be sufficient transverse steel to suppress brittle shear
or crushing failures and to prevent buckling of the main compression steel, once the
cover concrete has been lost. The main steel bars must not lose their anchorage into
the surrounding concrete during the repeated reversing loading cycles to which they
would be subjected during a major earthquake. Regular structures in zone-1 do not
need to be specifically designed or detailed for resistance to earthquake loads. For
irregular structures are dependent upon both the type of structural system adopted and
the type of member being considered. The relevant level of ductility is to be met by
following the detailing requirements for the particular structural system concerned. It
should perhaps be restated here that design and detailing are inseparable. Proper
detailing is required to ensure that the structure will respond under seismic loading in
the manner for which it has been designed (Wikipedia.org, 2005).
Seismic detailing of RC structures are mainly depended on the location of that

structure. All structural elements of a structure are not details in same way. Detailing
of different structural elements i.e. beam, column, joint of beam column and shear
walls will be described in the following section.
2.8.1 Flexural Members
Flexural members are defined as structural members that resist earthquake-induced

forces but have a factored axial compressive load that does not exceed Ag f’c/10,
where Ag is the gross area of the cross section. The members must have a clear span-
to-effective depth ratio of at least 4, a width-to-depth ratio of at least 0.3, and a web
width of not less than l0 in. nor more than the support width plus three quarters of the
flexural member depth on either side of the support. The minimum clear span-to-
depth ratio helps ensure that flexural rather than shear strength dominates member
behavior under inelastic load reversals. Minimum web dimensions help provide
adequate confinement for the concrete, whereas the width relative to the support
(typically a column) is limited to provide adequate moment transfer between beams
and columns (BNBC, 1993).
53
Flexural Reinforcement
Designing a beam involves the selection of its material properties (i.e., grades of steel
bars and concrete) and shape and size; these are usually selected as a part of an overall
design strategy of the whole building. And, the amount and distribution of steel to be
provided in the beam must be determined by performing design calculations.
Longitudinal bars are provided to resist flexural cracking on the side of the beam that
stretches. Since both top and bottom faces stretch during strong earthquake shaking,
longitudinal steel bars are required on both faces at the ends and on the bottom face at
mid-length Figure 2.28.
Figure 2.28: Location and amount of longitudinal reinforcement in beams (BNBC, 1993).
The maximum steel ratio þ is limited to 0.025 to insure ductility. The various
minimum requirements for as are summarized and these minimums are given below
(BNBC, 1993):
a) Minimum top and bottom steel for the full length of beam, at least two
bars top and bottom on each face the area should be at least 200bwd/fy.
b) At any section the top or bottom steel should not be less than of the
steel for the maximum negative moment at the supports.
c) At each support minimum bottom steel must equal of the negative

moment steel.
54
Splices
Steel reinforcement bars are available usually in lengths of 12-14m. Thus, it becomes
necessary to overlap bars when beams of longer lengths are to be made. At the
location of the lap, the bars transfer large forces from one to another. Laps of
longitudinal bars are:
(a) Made away from the face of the column, and
(b) Not made at locations where they are likely to stretch by large amounts and yield
(e.g., bottom bars at mid-length of the beam).
Moreover, at the locations of laps, vertical stirrups should be provided at a closer
spacing Figure 2.29 (BNBC, 1993).
Figure 2.29: Details of lapping reinforcement in beam.
The splice is confined by hoop or spiral reinforcement at a spacing not more than ¼ of
the effective depth or 4 in. Lap splices are not allowed in joints within a distance of
twice the member depth from the face of the support or where flexural yielding is
anticipated under earthquake deformations. Welded splices or mechanical connectors
may be used if no more than half the bars in a layer are spliced at a section and the
distance along bars between such splices on adjacent bars is at least 24 in (BNBC,
1993).
55
Confinement Reinforcement
Adequate confinement is required at ends of flexural members, where plastic hinges

are likely to form, in order to ensure sufficient ductility of the members under
reversible loads. Transverse reinforcement is also required at these locations to assist
the concrete in resisting shear and to maintain lateral support for the reinforcing bars.
Stirrups in RC beams help in three ways, namely (BNBC, 1993).
a) Carry the vertical shear force and thereby resist diagonal shear cracks
b) Protect the concrete from bulging outwards due to flexure, and
c) Prevent the buckling of the compressed longitudinal bars due to flexure. In
moderate to severe seismic zones, the following requirements are related to stirrups in
reinforced concrete beams (BNBC, 1993):
i) The diameter of stirrup must be at least 6mm; in beams more than 5m long,
it must be at least 8mm.
ii) Both ends of the vertical stirrups should be bent into a 135° hook and
extended sufficiently beyond this hook to ensure that the stirrup does not open
out in an earthquake Figure 2.30.
Figure 2.30: Details of confinement reinforcement
d) The spacing of vertical stirrups in any portion of the beam should be determined
from calculations
e) The maximum spacing of stirrups is less than half the depth of the beam.
56
f) For a length of twice the depth of the beam from the face of the column, an even
more stringent spacing of stirrups is specified, namely half the spacing.
Figure 2.31: Location and spacing of vertical stirrups in beam
In regions of high seismic risk, the transverse reinforcement for confinement must
consist of hoops. Hoops are required over a length twice the member depth measured
from face of support or in each direction from any section where yielding is expected.
Wherever inelastic deformation causes the development of yielding away from the
end of a member (as a concentrated load near midspan), this point is treated as a
column face for determining the requirements for closed hoops. Spacing of hoops
must not exceed d/4, 8 times the diameter of the smallest longitudinal bar, 24 times
the diameter of the hoop bars or 12 in Figure 2.31. Along the remainder of the
member, stirrups at no more than d/2 spacing are required (BNBC, 1993).
2.8.2 Members Subjected to Flexural and Axial Load
Members subjected to combined bending and axial loads and would typically apply to
columns of frames and other flexural members which carry a factored axial load
Agf'c
P u > 10 . The geometric constraint requirements are based on results from previous
practice and tests (BNBC, 1993).
57
Flexural Member
Columns must be provided with sufficient strength so that they will not yield prior to
the beams. Lateral sway caused by column hinging may result in excessive damage.
Yielding of the columns prior to the beams could also result in total collapse of the
structure. For these reasons, columns are designed with 20% higher flexural strength
as compared to beams at the same joint Figure 2.32 (BNBC, 1993).
N3
M3
V3
V2 V1
M 2 < M1 M1
V4
M4
N4
Figure. 2.32: Weak beam strong column concept (BNBC, 1993).
Column flexural strength is calculated considering the factored axial force on the
column. This provision is extremely important because it is intended to force hinging
into beam elements or girders. Experience with structures in seismic zones indicates
that column hinging generally leads to greater damage to the structure and less
stability under large lateral deformations. If the requirement in equation 2.11 is not
satisfied at a joint columns must have closely spaced transverse reinforcement over
their full height instead of the critical end regions described in the next section.
• M e ≥ 6/5 • M g (2.11)
• M e = sum of moments, at the center of the joint, corresponding to the
design flexural strength of the columns framing into that joint. Column
flexural strength shall be calculated for the factored axial force, consistent
with the direction of the lateral forces considered, resulting in the lowest
flexural strength.
• M g = sum of moments, at the center of the joint, corresponding to the

design flexural strength of the girders framing into that joint.
58
The column flexural strength is calculated for the factored axial load, consistent with
the direction of the lateral forces considered, resulting in the lowest flexural strength.
Columns contain two types of steel reinforcement, namely:
a) Long straight bars (called longitudinal bars) placed vertically along the length, the
diameter of this bar not less than 16mm and
b) Closed loops of smaller diameter steel bars (called transverse ties) placed
horizontally at regular intervals along its full length.
This lower ratio prevents congestion of steel, which reduces the chance of improperly
placed concrete. It also prevents the development of large shear stresses in the
columns. Typically, providing a reinforcement ratio larger than about 4% is not
practical or economical. The longitudinal reinforcement ratio must be between 1%
and 8%. The smallest dimension of the column must be at least 12" in the ratio of
short-to-long sides of the column should not be less than 0.4 (BNBC, 1993).
Splices
In the construction of RC buildings, due to the limitations in available length of bars

and due to constraints in construction, there are numerous occasions when column
bars have to be joined. A simple way of achieving this is by overlapping the two bars
over at least a minimum specified length, called lap length. Lap splices are to be
located at mid-height to prevent the splices from being in areas of spalling and high
stress as shown in Figure 2.33.
The lap splices should be designed as tension lap splices and adequately confined
with transverse reinforcement. The lap length depends on types of reinforcement and
concrete. For ordinary situations, it is about 50 times bar diameter lap length be
provided only in the middle half of column and not near its top or bottom ends. Also,
only half the vertical bars in the column are to be lapped at a time in any storey.
Further, when laps are provided, ties must be provided along the length of the lap at a
spacing not more than 150mm (BNBC, 1993).
59
Figure 2.33: Location and spacing of ties in column.
Transverse Reinforcement
Column ends require adequate confinement to ensure column ductility in the event of
hinge formation. They also require adequate shear reinforcement in order to prevent
shear failures prior to the development of the flexural capacity of the section. The
correct amount, spacing, and location of the transverse reinforcement must be
provided so that both the confinement and shear strength requirements are satisfied
Figure 2.33. Closely spaced horizontal closed ties help in three ways, namely:
a) It carries the horizontal shear forces induced by earthquakes, and thereby

resist diagonal shear cracks,
b) It holds together the vertical bars and prevents them from excessively
bending outwards (in technical terms, this bending phenomenon is called
buckling), and
c) It contains the concrete in the column within the closed loops. The ends of
the ties must be bent as 135° hooks. Such hook ends prevent opening of loops
and consequently buckling of concrete and buckling of vertical bars (BNBC,
1993).
60
(d) Closely spaced ties must be provided at the two ends of the column over a
length not less than larger dimension of the column, one-sixth the column
height or 450mm.
e) Over the distance specified in item:
i) Above and below a beam-column junction, the vertical spacing of
ties in columns should not exceed D/4 for where D is the smallest
dimension of the column (e.g., in a rectangular column, D is the length
of the small side). This spacing need not be less than 75mm nor more
than 100mm. At other locations, ties are spaced as per calculations but
not more than D/2.
ii) The length of tie beyond the 135° bends must be at least 10 times
diameter of steel bar used to make the closed tie; this extension beyond
the bend should not be less than 75mm. Construction drawings with
clear details of closed ties are helpful in the effective implementation
at construction site (BNBC, 1993).
2.8.3 Beam-Column Joint
In RC buildings, portions of columns that are common to beams at their intersections

are called beam column joints Figure 2.34. The overall integrity of a structure is
dependent on the behavior of the beam-column joint. Degradation of the joint can
result in large lateral deformations which can cause excessive damage or even failure.
Figure 2.34: Beam-column joint of a building. (Murty, 2005)
61
Under earthquake shaking, the beams adjoining a joint are subjected to moments in
the same (clockwise or counter-clockwise) direction. Under these moments, the top
bars in the beam-column joint are pulled in one direction and the bottom ones in the
opposite direction. These forces are balanced by bond stress developed between
concrete and steel in the joint region. If the column is not wide enough or if the
strength of concrete in the joint is low, there is insufficient grip of concrete on the
steel bars. In such circumstances, the bar slips inside the joint region, and beams loose
their capacity to carry load. Further, under the action of the above pull-push forces at
top and bottom ends, joints undergo geometric distortion; one diagonal length of the
joint elongates and the other compresses Figure 2.35. If the column cross-sectional
size is insufficient, the concrete in the joint develops diagonal cracks (Murty, 2005).
Figure 2.35: Pull-push forces on joint (Murty, 2005).
Reinforcement in Beam-Column Joint
For seismic zone-1 and 2 the beam-column joints do not require the special design
and detailing requirements as for zone-3 (BNBC, 1993). Since their constituent
materials have limited strengths, the joints have limited force carrying capacity. When
forces larger than these are applied during earthquakes, joints are severely damaged.
Repairing damaged joints is difficult, and so damage must be avoided. Thus, beam-
column joints must be designed to resist earthquake effects (Murty, 2005).
62
Problems of diagonal cracking and crushing of concrete in the joint region can be
controlled by two means, namely providing large column sizes and providing closely
spaced closed-loop steel ties around column bars in the joint region. Figure 2.36 and
2.37 are shown the various joint confinements. Confinement requirement at joint
mainly depends on joining of various structural elements. It is very difficult to fix
confined reinforcement at joint but its importance is more specially at high seismic
area.
Figure 2.36: Transverse reinforcement for joint (not confined by structural members)
Figure 2.37: Transverse reinforcement for joint (confined by structural members)
63
The ties hold together the concrete in the joint and also resist shear force, thereby
reducing the cracking and crushing of concrete (Wikipedia. org, 2005). It is very
difficult to provide close-loop ties in the joint require some extra effort. Figure 2.38 is
describable the technique to fix loops at joints.
Temporary (a) Stage I :

prop Beam top bars are not
placed, but horizontal
ties in the joint region
are stacked up.
(b) Stage II :
Top bars of the beam are
inserted in the beam
stirrups, and beam
reinforcement cage is
lowered into the form work
(c) Stage III :

Ties in the joint region are raised to
their final locations, tied with binding
wire, and column ties are continued.
Figure 2.38: Stages for providing horizontal ties in joint (Murty, 2005)
2.8.4 Anchoring Beam Bars
The gripping of beam bars in the joint region is improved first by using columns of
reasonably large cross-sectional size. A column in seismic zone-3 is to be at least
300mm wide when they support beams that are longer than 5 meter or when these
columns are taller than 4 meter between floors (or beams). The American Concrete
Institute recommends a column width of at least 20 times the diameter of largest
longitudinal bar used in adjoining beam (Murty, 2005).
In exterior joints where beams terminate at columns Figure 2.39, longitudinal beam
bars need to be anchored into the column to ensure proper gripping of bar in joint.
The length of anchorage for a bar of grade Fe415 (characteristic tensile strength of
415 MPa) is about 50 times its diameter.
64
Figure 2.39: Anchorage of beam bars in exterior joint.
This length is measured from the face of the column to the end of the bar anchored in
the column. In columns of small widths and when beam bars are of large diameter, a
portion of beam top bar is embedded in the column that is cast up to the soffit of the
beam, and a part of it overhangs. It is difficult to hold such an overhanging beam top
bar in position while casting the column up to the soffit of the beam. On the other
hand, if column width is large, the beam bars may not extend below the soffit of the
beam. Thus, it is preferable to have columns with sufficient width. The development
length of bars depends on the bars arrangement at joint (hooked or straight). It also
depends on area (tension or compression) where the bars are located.
Hooked and Straight Bars
The minimum development lengths Figure 2.40, practically depend on the size of
reinforcement. Development length requirements for hooked and straight bars are
given below:
a) The development length, l dh for a bar with a standard 90° hook shall be not
less than (i) 8d b (ii) 150mm, and (iii) the length required by Equation 2.12.
0.185 fydb ( 2.12 )

l dh =
√fc
for bar sizes 10mm dia through 35mm dia.
65
b) For bar sizes 10mm through 35mm dia, the development length, l d , for
straight bar shall not be less than
i) Two-and-a-half (2.5) times the length required by BNBC-1993 Art

8.3.7.4a if the depth of the concrete cast in one lift beneath the bar does not
exceed 300 mm and
ii) Three-and-a half (3.5) times the length required by BNBC-1993 Art
8.3.7.4a if the depth of the concrete cast in one lift beneath the bar exceeds
300 mm.
c) Straight bars terminated at a joint shall pass through the confined core of a
column or of a boundary member. Any portion of the straight embedment length not
within the confined core shall be increased by a factor of 1.6.
Figure 2.40: Development length.
2.8.5 Shear Walls

Reinforced concrete (RC) buildings often have vertical plate-like RC walls called
Shear Walls (Figure 2.41) in addition to slabs, beams and columns. These walls
generally start at foundation level and are continuous throughout the building height.
Their thickness can be as low as 150mm, or as high as 400mm in high rise buildings.
Shear walls are usually provided along both length and width of buildings. Shear
walls are like vertically-oriented wide beams that carry earthquake loads downwards
66
to the foundation. Properly designed and detailed buildings with shear walls have
shown very good performance in past earthquakes.
However, in past earthquakes, even buildings with sufficient amount of walls that
were not specially detailed for seismic performance (but had enough well-distributed
reinforcement) were saved from collapse. Shear wall buildings are a popular choice in
many earthquake prone countries, like Chile, New Zealand and USA. Shear walls are
easy to construct, because reinforcement detailing of walls is relatively straight-
forward and therefore easily implemented at site. Shear walls are efficient, both in
terms of construction cost and effectiveness in minimizing earthquake damage in
structural and nonstructural element (Murty, 2005). Shear walls in buildings must be
symmetrically located in plan to reduce ill-effects of twist in buildings. They could be
placed symmetrically along one or both directions in plan. End regions of a wall with
increased confinement are called boundary element. This special confining transverse
reinforcement in boundary elements is similar to that provided in columns of RC
frames.
Figure 2.41: Shear wall and reinforcement
67
2.9 Estimating and Costing
For all engineering works it is required to know beforehand the probable cost of
construction known as the estimated cost. If the estimated cost is greater than the
money available, then attempts are made to reduce the cost by reducing the work or
by changing the specifications. From this the importance of estimate for engineers
may be understood. In preparing an estimate, the quantities of different items of work
are calculated by simple menstruation method and from these quantities the cost is
calculated. The subject of estimating is simple, nothing much to understand, but
knowledge of drawing is essential (Robert, 1989).
Accuracy in estimate is very important, if estimate is exceeded it becomes a very

difficult problem for engineers to explain, to account for and arrange for the
additional money. Inaccuracy in preparing estimate, omission of items, changes in
designs, improper rates, etc. are the reasons for exceeding the estimate, though
increase in the rates is one. The rate of each item should also be reasonable and
workable. The rates in the estimate provide for the complete work, which consist of
the cost of materials, cost of transport, cost of labour, cost of scaffolding, cost of tools
and plants, cost of water, taxes, establishment and supervision cost, reasonable profit
of contractor, etc. The primary object of the estimate is to enable one to know
beforehand, the cost of the work (buildings, structures, etc). The estimate is the
probable cost of a work and is determined theoretically by mathematical calculations
based on the plans and drawing and current rates. There are numerous methods to
calculate the project cost. Approximate estimate may be prepared by various methods
but accurate estimate is prepared by Detailed Estimate Method. Preparation of
detailed estimate consists of working out the quantities of different items of work and
then working out the cost. Various estimating and costing methods are explained in
following section.
2.9.1 Details of Measurements and Calculation of Quantities
The whole work is divided into different items of work as earthwork, concrete,
brickwork, etc. and the items are classified and grouped under different sub-heads,
and details of measurement of each item of work are taken out and quantities under
each item are computed in prescribed form - Details of Measurement Form. It is better
to add one more column for total quantity or content.
68
2.9.2 Abstract of Estimated Cost
The cost under item of work is calculated from the quantities already computed at
workable rate, and the total cost is worked out in a prescribed form, Abstract of
Estimate Form. A percentage of 3 to 5 percent is added for contingencies, to allow for
petty contingent expenditures, unforeseen expenditures, changes in design, changes in
rates, etc. which may occur during the execution of the work. A percentage of 1 to 2
per cent is also added to meet the expenditure of work-charged establishment. The
grand total thus obtained is the estimated cost of the work.
2.9.3 Plinth Area Rates
Plinth area of a building is the area obtained by the measuring from outside to outside
of all plinth walls. Plinth offset should be included but steps below the plinth should
be omitted. Rates per square meter corrected up to November, 1997 (published by
public works department).
The cost of the building is roughly calculated on the basis of plinth area rate. The rate
per unit of item of any work depends upon the cost of the materials, cost of labour and
other miscellaneous expenses. When the cost of materials and rates of labour go on
changing from time to time, the output constants and the quantities of materials
remain constant.
Plinth area estimates are prepared on the plinth area basis by multiplying the
prevailing plinth area rates of similar building in the locality. Plinth area should be
calculated for the covered area by taking external dimensions of the building at the
floor level excluding plinth offsets. Court yard and other open areas should not be
included.
The building consists of many components e.g. foundation, wall, floor, slab column,
beam, doors and windows, electrical, sanitary and water supply elements. Now for
simplifying the assessment, it is a common practice to formulate the total cost and
divide the same by the plinth area to standardize the cost per plinth area which is easy
to practice.
69
2.9.4 Analysis of Materials
Estimation of a structure can be done by the analysis of required construction

materials. Analysis of few important materials that follows, will give better idea of
quantities of materials and men required to carry out a certain unit of work. This
analysis is mainly done based on the proportion of materials required for particular
work done. Such as Concrete volumes are measured in cubic feet, however, the total
volume of cement, sand and khoa going into the concrete mixture is always more than
the volume of the mixed concrete. This is because the cement and sand go into the
airspaces between the pieces of Khoa. For example, a 1:2:4 concrete mix (one unit
cement, two units sand, four units khoa) does not make 7 units of concrete rather, it
makes just about 4 units of concrete after mixing.
Standard size of bricks is 9.5" x 4.5" x 2.75". Generally, for every one hundred cft of
brick work, 1152 bricks are required. This volume calculation allows for the space
taken by the mortar. The mortar for 100 cft. of brick work in a solid mass of masonry
mixed in a 1:4 ratio (one unit of cement to four unit of sand) required about 7.5 cft of
cement (6 bags) and 30 cft of sand.
70
B/W Print - 5-8,16-17,19-20,22,26-29,31-42,45-60,63,65-70
Auto CAD Print: 32-34,36,45,51,54-58,60,63,66-67
Color Print - 9-15,18,21,23-25,30,43-44,61-62,64
71
CHAPTER - 3
SELECTED STRUCTURES
3.1 General
The main objective of this study is to find out the variation of construction materials
loads required of a structure due to seismic in three different seismic zones. The
materials (reinforcement and concrete) that are generally available in Bangladesh
have been considered in this investigation. Structures of three different heights have
been considered for this study. Each height of structure has been analyzed for two
values of Response Modification Coefficient (R) in three seismic zones. To get the
outcome of this study, each structure has been analyzed, designed and estimated in
three seismic zones separately. This chapter will discuss about assumptions for
analysis, design, structural stability, models and software that have been considered
for the analysis and design of these selected structures. Analysis and design of these
structures have been carried out by using software. Comparisons have been done
based on analysis and design result for each height of structure in three seismic zones
for two values of R separately. Various results have been discussed in chapter four.
3.2 Design Criteria
To analyse and design of any structure using software, it is very much important to
input few important parameters such as, sizes of structural elements, material
properties and various loads. Self weight of a structure is automatically calculated by
the software according to size and material property, but other loads (live, floor finish,
partition wall, seismic and wind) are required to input before analysis. It is to be
mentioned here that seismic load, R and seismic detailing, are the three variables for
this study. Seismic load and detailing depend on location of structure. Other variable,
R depends on structural system. Selected structures have been analyzed and designed
for two values of R. Factors related with design criteria are given in following
sections.
3.2.1 Loads
All structures have been designed to resist gravity and lateral forces. Gravity load of a
structure depends on the sizes of structural elements. Lateral forces depend on the size
and shape of the structure as well as on its geographic location. In the present
investigation, wind and earthquake loads have been chosen as lateral loads. A
constant wind velocity (200 km/hour) is considered for this study in three seismic
71
zones as this wind velocity passes through the three seismic zones of Bangladesh.
Seismic force of a structure depends on weight, location, structural system of that
structure which is described in chapter two. Seismic zone coefficient (Z) and R are the
variable for seismic load in this study. Seismic zone coefficients are given as per
BNBC, 1993 for analysis of these structures. Other loads have been considered as per
BNBC, 1993 for analysis. It is to be mentioned here that all loads are needed to
combine before analysis. Loads combinations are also done as per BNBC, 1993. Load
combination as per BNBC, 1993 presented in Table 3.1.
Table 3.1: Loads Combinations (BNBC, 1993)

Serial No Load Combinations
1. 1.4 D
2. 1.4 D + 1.7 L
3. 1.4 D + 1.4 S
4. 0.9 D + 1.3 (W or 1.1 E)
5. 0.9 D + 1.3 (H or F)
6. 1.4 D + 1.7 L + 1.7 (H or F)
7. 0.75 [ 1.4 D + 1.4 S + 1.7 L ]
8. 0.75 [ 1.4 D + 1.4 S + 1.7 (W or 1.1 E) ]
9. 0.75 [ 1.4 D + 1.7 L + 1.7 W ]
10. 0.75 [ 1.4 D + 1.7 L + 1.7 (H or F) + 1.7 (W or 1.1 E) ]
11. 0.75 [ 1.4 D + 1.4 S + 1.7 L + 1.7 (H or F) + 1.7 (W or 1.1 E) ]
3.2.2 Materials Property
Any material which has got application in engineering constructions is termed as

engineering material. Every engineering structure must be sufficiently strong and
durable to resist the action of external forces and internal stresses due to various types
of loads. In order to achieve maximum economy, the engineer must know the strength
and characteristics of the materials. In this study, compressive strength of concrete
and tensile strength of steel are considered f'c = 4000 psi and fy = 60,000 psi
respectively. Reinforcement and concrete, these two materials have been estimated for
comparison of selected structures.
3.2.3 Structural System
Before starting analysis, a structure must be considered under a structural system.

Structural systems and configuration of a structure have been described in chapter
two. In this study two types of structural systems are considered i.e. moment resisting
frame and dual system. Three different heights (90, 130 and 170 feet) have been taken
in consideration for this study. A building of 90 feet height is considered as moment
72
resisting frame and other two heights of building are considered as dual system. To
fulfill the requirement of this study, each height of structure has been considered in
three seismic zones under same structural system for two values of R separately.
3.2.4 Response Modification Factor
The Response Modification Factor (R) is a measure of the ability of the structure to
withstand earthquake motions without collapse. It represents the ratio of forces in an
entirely linear elastic system to the forces anticipated in a system with significant
yielding. Its magnitude depends on the type and material of the structure, the
possibility of failure of the vertical load system, the degree of redundancy of the
system that would allow some localized failures without overall failure, and the
ability of the secondary system, in the case of dual systems, to stabilize the building
when the primary system suffers significant damage. Different code has been
specified for the value of R based on structural systems which have been described in
the chapter two. Two different values of R, 8 and 12 have been considered for this
study. Comparisons have been carried out on various aspects such as, analysis, design
result, and quantity of materials for these two values of R which have been given in
chapter four.
3.2.5 Detailing
The seismic detailing required for various structural elements, components of the
seismic-force-resisting system are stated in chapter two. The provision of detailing is
one of the major requirements for making a building earthquake resistant. Seismic
detailing for a structure in three seismic zones is not identical. Quantities of material
for same structural system in three seismic zones are varied for detailing of a
structure. Seismic detailing for different structural elements has been done as per
BNBC, 1993 for this study. It is a major factor for which quantity of reinforcement
will vary for a structure in three seismic zones. Detailing of different structural
elements according to BNBC, 1993 has been given in chapter two. It is to be
mentioned here that detailing in BNBC, 1993 for various structural elements are very
close to others national building code which have been discussed in chapter two.
3.3 Structural Stability
After analysis of a structure, few important parameters have been checked to see the
stability of a structure. In this study drift, overturning, base shear, and displacement
are checked for these different heights of structure in three seismic zones.
73
Comparisons are carried out on the analysis result for different heights of structure
which is given in chapter four.
3.3.1 Drift
Storey drift is the displacement of one level relative to the level above or below due to
the design lateral forces. The provision of adequate stiffness, particularly lateral
stiffness, is a major consideration in the design of building for several important
reasons. In terms of serviceability limit state, deflections must be maintained at a
sufficiently low level to allow proper functioning of non structural components and to
prevent excessive cracking and consequent loss of stiffness. One simple parameter
that affords and estimates the lateral stiffness of a building is the drift index, defined
as the ratio of the maximum deflection at the top of the building to the total height.
Design drifts index limits have been considered in this study as per BNBC, 1993.
3.3.2 Overturning
Every building has been designed to resist overturning caused by wind or earthquake,
which ever governs. Moments can be calculated from the triangular load distribution
formula. However, the loading is based on an envelope of maximum shears and may
be less at any moment in time. Overturning moment due to lateral load is checked at
the base of a structure. In this study overturning moment due to lateral load in x and y
direction are checked from ETABS analysis result.
3.4 Models
Three different heights of structures have been considered for this study. These
heights are 90 feet (27.43 meter), 130 feet (39.62 meter) and 150 feet (45.72 meters).
These 150, 130 and 90 feet height structures are identified as A, B and C Types
respectively for further discussion in chapter four. Plan and elevation of 90 feet, 130
feet and 150 feet heights structure have been shown in Figure 3.1, Figure 3.2 and
Figure 3.3 respectively. Initially same sizes of structural elements have been
considered for a structure in three seismic zones. After the analysis, for stability of the
structure, sizes have been increased in higher seismic force zones. So, the quantity of
materials is varying for same structure in different zones. It is discussed in chapter
four.
74
A B C D E F G H
4
21'
3
20'
2
21'
1
14' 12' 14' 11' 14' 12' 14'
( a ) Plan
7TH FLOOR
10'
6TH FLOOR
10'
5TH FLOOR
10'
4TH FLOOR
10'
3RD FLOOR
10'
2ND FLOOR
10'
1ST FLOOR
10'
G. F.
( b ) Front Elevation
Figure 3.1: Plan and front elevation for 90 feet (27.43 meter) height structure
75
A B C D E F G H
4
21'
3
20'
2
21'
1
14' 12' 14' 11' 14' 12' 14'
( a ) Plan
11TH FLOOR
10'
10TH FLOOR
10'
9TH FLOOR
10'
8TH FLOOR
10'
7TH FLOOR
10'
6TH FLOOR
10'
5TH FLOOR
10'
4TH FLOOR
10'
3RD FLOOR
10'
2ND FLOOR
10'
1ST FLOOR
10'
G. F.
Figure 3.2: Plan and front elevation of 120 feet (36.57 meter) height structure
76
A B C D E F G H
4
21'
3
20'
2
21'
1
14' 12' 14' 11' 14' 12' 14'
( a ) Plan
15TH FLOOR
10'
14TH FLOOR
10'
13TH FLOOR
10'
12TH FLOOR
10'
11TH FLOOR
10'
10TH FLOOR
10'
9TH FLOOR
10'
8TH FLOOR
10'
7TH FLOOR
10'
6TH FLOOR
10'
5TH FLOOR
10'
4TH FLOOR
10'
3RD FLOOR
10'
2ND FLOOR
10'
1ST FLOOR
10'
G. F.
Figure 3.3: Plan and front elevation of 150 feet (45.72 meter) height structure
77
3.5 Software
Software’s are used to save time for analysis and design of any structure. Two types
of software have been used for this study. Extended Three Dimensional Analysis of
Building System (ETABS) Nonlinear Version 9.5 and Slab Analysis by Finite
Element Method (SAFE) plus w/ detailer version 8.1.0 have been used for analysis,
design and estimating, of these selected structures.
For nearly 30 years, ETABS has been recognized as the industry standard for building
analysis and design software. Today, continuing in the same tradition, ETABS has
evolved into a completely integrated building analysis and design environment.
ETABS is the solution, whether it can design a simple 2D in frame or perform a
dynamic analysis of a complex high-rise that utilizes non-linear dampers for inter-
story drift control. In this study, ETABS software has been used for analysis and
design of beams and columns for these three selected structures.
SAFE is the ultimate tool for design of concrete floor and foundation systems. From
framing layout all the way through to detail drawing production, SAFE integrates
every aspect of the engineering design process in one easy and intuitive environment.
SAFE provides an immensely capable yet easy-to-use program for structural
designers, providing the only tool necessary for the modeling, analysis, design and
detailing of concrete slab systems and foundations. SAFE, software has been used for
analysis, design and estimation of slab and footing elements for 90 feet height
structure. These two types of software have been formulated based on finite element
method. It is described in Appendix E.
78
4.3 120 Feet (36.37 meter) Height Structure
Analysis, design and materials required for this structure have been carried out for
two different values of R in three seismic zones. In this section, initially comparisons
are carried out on analysis results such as storey deflection, storey drift, weight of
structure and base shear it is mainly carried out to check the stability of this structure
in three seismic zones. Comparisons are also carried out on design result of this
structure, to find out the variation of construction materials due to seismic load. It is
to be mentioned here that materials required for beams and columns are estimated for
comparing of this structure. Shear walls are incorporated for this height of structure to
resist lateral loads. Total quantity of reinforcement and concrete required in this
height of structure in three seismic zones are compared. Comparisons are also carried
out on materials required per square feet of this structure in three seismic zones.
4.3.1 Analysis Results
This structure is analyzed as a dual system frame structure. Here, constant wind
velocity is considered in three seismic zones. Loads are considered as per BNBC,
1993 which has been discussed in chapter three. Results have been compared, on
storey deflection, storey drift, base shear and weight of structure for two values of R
in three seismic zones.
4.3.1.1 Storey Deflection
Storey deflection for lateral load at X and Y-directions are shown from Figure 4.29
and Figure 4.30 for two different values of R. Allowable deflection(h/650 to h/350)
due to lateral loads at different storey levels are compared with actual deflections in
three seismic zones. It is observed that the deflections at different storey level due to
lateral load are less than its allowable limits in three seismic zones for both values of
R.
97
Storey (h/H)
Deflection (inch)
Figure 4.29: Storey deflection along X-direction (R = 8 and 12)

Storey (h/H)
Deflection (inch)
Figure 4.30: Storey deflection along Y-direction (R = 8 and 12)
98
4.3.1.2 Storey Drift
Storey Drift at different levels due to X and Y direction lateral loads are shown in
Figure 4.31 and Figure 4.32 for three seismic zones. It is found that storey drift in
zone-2 and zone-3 are very close to each other. Percentage of variation is more in
zone-2 and zone-3 with respect to zone-1. However, it is very small between zone-2
and zone-3. It is to be highlighted here that allowable drift (0.0015 to 0.004) at
different storey levels as per BNBC, 1993 are more than actual drift of this structure.
Storey (h/H)
Figure 4.31: Storey drift along X-direction (R = 8 and 12)
Figure 4.32: Storey drift along Y-direction (R = 8 and 12)
99
4.3.1.3 Weight and Base Shear of Building
Figure 4.33 shows the total weight of this structure in three seismic zones. It is
observed that total weight of this structure is equal for both values of R in same
seismic zone. So, the value of R has no effect on weight of this structure in same
seismic zone. Lateral loads on this structure are not same in three seismic zones. So,
the sizes of the structural elements are required to change for controlling drift.
Therefore, the weight of this structure is not same in three seismic zones
Weight (Kip)
Figure 4.33: Weight of building in three seismic zones

Base shear of this building is given in Figure 4.34 for two different values of R in
three seismic zones.
Base Shear (Kips)
Figure 4.34: Base Shear in three seismic zones (R = 8 and 12)
100
4.3.2 Comparison on Design Result
Reinforcement and concrete required in beams, columns and shear walls have been
estimated for comparison of this structure in three seismic zones. A beam and a
column have been considered separately in three seismic zones, to find out the
difference of reinforcement due to seismic load. Reinforcement and concrete are
compared for beams, columns and shear walls for two values of R in three seismic
zones. Design out put of various structural elements has been given in Appendix G for
two values of R.
4.3.2.1 Beam Reinforcement
To find out the variation of reinforcement for seismic load, a beam has been designed
in three seismic zones in both the cases; all design parameters are same other than
seismic zone coefficient. These comparisons are carried out for two values of R. It is
observed that the total quantities of beam reinforcement are not same in three seismic
zones for this structure. All beams of this structure are not also designed based on
same load combination.
A Beam in Different Zones
A beam BC at Figure 4.35 is considered for comparing reinforcement among three
seismic zones. It is found that this beam is designed based on wind load and seismic
load combination in seismic zone-1 and seismic zone-3 respectively for both values of
R. But this beam is designed based on seismic load at seismic zone-2 for R equal 8. It
is also found that at seismic zone-2, from 3rd to 7th floor this beam is designed based
on seismic load combination, rest floors beams are designed based on wind load
combination, when the value of R equal to 12.
101
A B C D E F G H
4
21'
3
20'
2
21'
1
14' 12' 14' 11' 14' 12' 14'
( a ) Plan
11TH FLOOR
10'
10TH FLOOR
10'
9TH FLOOR
10'
8TH FLOOR
10'
7TH FLOOR
10'
6TH FLOOR
10'
5TH FLOOR
10'
4TH FLOOR
10'
3RD FLOOR
10'
2ND FLOOR
10'
1ST FLOOR
10'
G. F.
Figure 4.35: A beam BC in different seismic zones.
102
Figure 4.36 and Figure 4.37 shows the percentage of positive and negative
reinforcement of this beam for the two values of R in three seismic zones. It is found
that both reinforcement variations at zone-3 are more than other zones for R equal to
8. It is also observed that both types of reinforcement in other zones are very close for
two values of R.
Storey (h/H)
Reinforcement (%)
Figure 4.36: Negative reinforcement in beam BC (R = 8 and 12)
Storey (h/H)
Reinforcement (%)
Figure 4.37: Positive reinforcement in beam BC (R = 8 and 12)
103
Total Beam Reinforcement
Figure 4.38 shows the total reinforcement required in beams for this structure in three
seismic zones. It is observed that total reinforcement required in zone-1, zone-2 and
zone-3 are 68, 76 and 80 tons respectively for R equals to 8. In the same way,
reinforcement required in zone-1, zone-2 and zone-3 are 68, 72 and 74 tons for R
equal to 12 respectively. Reinforcement required in beam at zone-2 is 11%, 7% more
than zone-1 and zone-3 is 9%, 5% more than zone-2 for R equal to 8 and 12,
respectively.
Reinforcement (Tons)
Figure 4.38: Total reinforcement for beams (R=8 and 12)
4.3.2.2 Columns Reinforcement
A column is considered for two different values of R in three seismic zones. Here,
analysis and design parameters for column elements are equal in three seismic zones,
only seismic zone coefficients are varied. It is also estimated the total quantity of
reinforcement required in three seismic zones for two values of R.
104
A Column for Three Seismic Zones
A column is considered to find out the variation of reinforcement column in three

seismic zones. Figure 4.39 shows the location of column in this structure.
A B C D E F G H
4
21'
3
20'
2
21'
1
14' 12' 14' 11' 14' 12' 14'
( a ) Plan
Figure 4.39: A column in three seismic zones
Figure 4.40 shows the reinforcement required for this column in three seismic zones
for both values of R. It is observed that all columns in seismic zone-1 is designed
based on wind load and in seismic zone-3 is designed based on seismic load. Few
columns are designed based on both wind and seismic load combination in zone-2.
105
Storey (h/H)
Reinforcement (%)
Figure 4.40: A column in three seismic zones (R = 8 and 12)
Total Column Reinforcement
Total reinforcement required for column of this structure is given in Figure 4.41 for
the two different values of R. It is observed that reinforcement in zone-2 is 17% and
14% more than that of zone-1 and at zone-3 is 13% and 8% more than that of zone-2
for R equal to 8 and 12 respectively.
Figure 4.41: Total reinforcement required for column (R = 8 and 12)
106
4.3.2.3 Shear Wall Reinforcement
Reinforcement required for shear wall is shown in Figure 4.42. Here it is found that
reinforcement in Zone-1 and 2 are equal for two different values of R. It indicates that
in seismic zone-1 and 2 these walls are designed based on wind load combination for
both values of R. Reinforcement is differing in seismic zone-3 for R equal to 8 and
12. It indicates these walls are designed based on seismic load combination at zone-3.
Reinforcement requires in zone-1, zone-2 and zone-3 are 9.25, 10.74 and 11.1 tons for
R equal to 12. In the same way reinforcement requires in zone-1, zone-2 and zone-3
are 9.25, 10.74 and 16.43 tons for R equal to 8.
Figure 4.42: Total reinforcement for shear wall (R = 8 and 12)
4.3.3 Total Reinforcement for Beam, Column and Shear wall

Total reinforcement required for beams, columns and shear walls of this structure in
three seismic zones for two values of R is shown in Figure 4.43. The quantity of
reinforcement for beams, columns and shear wall elements in zone-1, zone-2 and
zone-3 are 115, 130 and 141 tons respectively for R equal to 8. In the same way, 115,
125 and 131 tons are in zone-1, zone-2 and zone-3 respectively for R equal to 12.
Here, it is found that same quantity of reinforcement is required in seismic zone-1 for
both two values of R. It is indicating that there is no seismic load effect on this
structure for both values of R. So, this structure is designed based on wind load
combination in that zone.
107
Figure 4.43: Total reinforcement in three seismic zones (R = 8 and 12)
Reinforcement required in each square feet area of this structure for beams, columns
and shear wall elements in three seismic zones for the two different values of R is
shown in Figure 4.44. It is found that average reinforcement required for each square
feet in zone-1, zone-2 and zone-3 are 1.90, 2.12 and 2.30 kg respectively for R equal
to 8. Similarly, reinforcement required in each square feet of this structure are 1.90,
2.02 and 2.13 kg in zone-1, zone-2 and zone-3 respectively for R equal to 12.
Reinforcement (Kg/sft)
Figure 4.44: Reinforcement required in each square feet (R = 8 and 12).
108
4.3.4 Reinforcement Comparison among Zones
Reinforcement is compared in percentage among three seismic zones which is shown

in Figure 4.45. It is mainly carried out between zone-1 and zone-2, zone-2 and zone-3
for two different values of R. Reinforcement required at zone-2 is 11% and 7% more
than that of zone-1 for R equal 8 and to 12 respectively. Again, in the same way
reinforcement required in zone-3 is 9% and 6% more than zone-2 for R equal to 8 and
12 respectively.
Reinforcement (%)
Figure 4.45: Comparison of reinforcement between zone-1and 2, zone 2 and zone-3

4.3.5 Concrete Required in Beam, Column and Shear Wall
An estimation is also carried out to find the variation of concrete in three seismic
zones for this structure. It is found that there is no effect on total volume of concrete
for changing the value of R in same seismic zone. Figure 4.46 shows the total
concrete required in this structure for the beams and columns in three seismic zones,
individually.
Figure 4.46: Comparison of total concrete among three seismic zones
109
A comparison is carried out on concrete required in each square feet of this structure
for the beams and columns in three seismic zones. Figure 4.47 shows the quantity of
concrete required in each square feet of this structure in three seismic zones.
Figure 4.47: Concrete in each square feet for three seismic zones
Finally, a comparison is also carried out for the requirement of concrete between
seismic zone 1 and zone 2, zone 2 and zone 3. Figure 4.48 shows the variation of
concrete of this structure in three seismic zones. It is found that concrete required for
zone-2 is 4% more than that of zone-1and zone-3 is 6 % more than that of zone-2.
Figure 4.48: Comparison of concrete between zone-1 and zone-2, zone-2 and zone-3
110
Analysis, design and materials required for this structure has been carried out
for two different values of R in three seismic zones. In this section, initially
comparisons are carried out on analysis results such as storey deflection, storey
drift, weight of structure and base shear in three seismic zones for two different
values of R. It is mainly carried out to check the stability of this structure in
three seismic zones. Comparisons are also carried out on design result of this
structure, to find out the variation of construction materials due to seismic load,
among three seismic zones for two values of R. It is to be mentioned here that
materials required for beams, columns and shear wall are estimated for
comparing of this structure. Shear walls are incorporated for this height of
structure to resist lateral loads. It is compared on total quantity of
reinforcement and concrete required in this height of structure in three seismic
zones. Comparisons are also carried out on materials required per square feet of
this structure in three seismic zones.
This structure is analyzed as a dual system frame structure. Here, constant wind
velocity is considered in three seismic zones. Loads are considered as per
BNBC, 1993 which has been discussed in chapter three. Results have been
compared, on storey deflection, storey drift, base shear and weight of structure
for two values of R in three seismic zones.
4.4.1.1 Storey Deflection
Storey deflection for lateral load at X and Y-directions are shown in Figure
4.49 and Figure 4.50 for two different values of R. Allowable deflection due to
lateral loads at different storey levels are compared with actual deflections in
three seismic zones. It is observed that the deflections at different storey level
due to lateral load are less than its allowable limits (h/650 to h/350) in three
seismic zones for both values of R.
111
Figure 4.49: Storey deflection along X-direction (R = 8 and 12)
Figure 4.50: Storey deflection along Y-direction (R = 8 and 12)
112
Storey drift at different levels due to X and Y direction lateral loads are shown
in Figure 4.51 to Figure 4.52 for three seismic zones. It is found that storey
drift in zone-2 and zone-3 are very close to each other. Percentage of variation
is more in zone-2 and zone-3 with respect to zone-1. However, it is very small
between zone-2 and zone-3. It is to be highlighted here that allowable drift at
different storey levels as per BNBC, 1993 are more than actual drift of this
structure.
Figure 4.51: Storey drift along X-direction (R = 8 and 12)
Figure 4.52: Storey drift along Y-direction (R = 8 and 12)
113
4.4.1.3 Weight and Base Shear of Building
seismic zone. So, the value of R has no effect on weight of this structure in
same seismic zone. Lateral loads on this structure are not same in three seismic
zones. So, the sizes of the structural elements are required to change for
controlling drift. Therefore, the weight of this structure is varied in three
seismic zones.
Zone
Figure 4.53: Weight of building in three seismic zones
Base shear of this building is given in Figure 4.54 for two different values of R
in three seismic zones.
Figure 4.54: Base shear in three seismic zones (R = 8 and 12)
114
4.4.2 Comparison of Design Result
Reinforcement and concrete required in beams, columns and shear walls have
been estimated for comparison of this structure in three seismic zones . A beam
and a column have been considered separately in three seismic zones, to find
out the difference of reinforcement due to seismic load. Reinforcement and
concrete are compared for beams, columns and shear walls for two values of R
in three seismic zones. Design output of various structural elements has been
given in Appendix H for two values of R.
4.4.2.1 Beam Reinforcement.
To find out the variation of reinforcement for seismic load, a beam has been
designed in three seismic zones in both the cases; all design parameters are
same other than seismic zone coefficient. These comparisons are carried out for
two values of R. It is observed that the total quantity of beam reinforcement is
not same in three seismic zones for this structure. All beams of this structure
are not also designed based on same load combination.
A beam BC at Figure 4.55 is considered for comparing reinforcement among

three seismic zones.
A B C D E F G H
4
6.40
3
6.09
2
6.40
1
4.27 3.66 4.26 3.35 4.26 3.65 4.27
Figure 4.55: A beam BC in different zone
115
It is found that this beam is designed based on wind load and seismic load
combination in seismic zone-1 and seismic zone-3 respectively for both values
of R. But this beam is designed based on seismic load at seismic zone-2 for R
equal to 8. It is also found that at seismic zone-2, from 3rd to 7th floor this
beam is designed based on seismic load combination and the rest floor beams
are designed based on wind load combination, when the value of R equal to 12.
Figure 4.56 and Figure 4.57 show the percentage of positive and negative
reinforcement in this beam for the values of R in three seismic zones. It is
found that reinforcement variations at zone-3 are more than other zones for R
equal 8. It is also observed that reinforcement in other zones are very close for
two values of R.
Figure 4.56: Negative reinforcement in beam BC (R = 8 and 12)
116
Figure 4.57: Positive reinforcement in beams BC (R = 8 and 12)
Figure 4.58 shows the total reinforcement required in beams for this structure
in three seismic zones. It is observed that total reinforcement required in zone-
1, zone-2 and zone-3 are 104, 109 and 116 tons respectively for R equal to 8. In
the same way, reinforcement required in zone-1, zone-2 and zone-3 are 104,
107 and 113 tons for R equal to 12 respectively. Reinforcement required in
beam at zone-2 is 7%, 4% more than zone-1 and zone-3 is 6%, 4% more than
zone-2 for R equal to 8 and 12, respectively.
Figure 4.58: Total beam reinforcement (R = 8 and 12).
117
4.4.2.2 Columns Reinforcement
A column is considered for two different values of R in three seismic zones.

Here, analysis and design parameters for column elements are equal in three
seismic zones; only seismic zone coefficients are varied. The total quantities of
reinforcement required are also estimated in three seismic zones for two values
of R.
A Column for Three Seismic Zones
A column is considered to find out the variation of reinforcement of this

structure for column in three seismic zones. Figure 4.59 shows the location of
column in this structure.
A B C D E F G H
4
21'
3
20'
2
21'
1
14' 12' 14' 11' 14' 12' 14'
( a ) Plan
Figure 4.59: A column in three seismic zones
Figure 4.60 shows the reinforcement required for this column in three seismic
zones for both values of R. It is observed that all columns in seismic zone-1 is
designed based on wind load and in seismic zone-3 is designed based on
118
seismic load. Few columns are designed based on both wind and seismic load
combination in zone-2.
Figure 4.60: Reinforcement for selected column in three seismic zones (R = 8 and 12)
Total reinforcement required for column of this structure is given in Figure

4.61 for the two different values of R. It is observed that reinforcement in zone-
2 is 12% and 7% more than that of zone-1 and at zone-3 is 8% and 6% more
than that of zone-2 for R equal to 8 and 12 respectively.
Figure 4.61: Total reinforcement for columns (R = 8 and 12)
119
4.4.2.3 Shear Wall Reinforcement
Reinforcement require for shear wall is shown in Figure 4.62. It is found that
the shear reinforcement in seismic zone-1 and 2 are equal for two different
values of R. It is indicated that in seismic zone-1 and zone-2 these walls are
designed based on wind load combination. But reinforcement is differing in
seismic zone-3for R equal to 8 and 12. It indicates these walls are designed
based on seismic load combination at zone-3. Reinforcement required in zone-
1, zone-2 and zone-3 are 15.22, 15.87 and 16.59 tons for R equal to 12. In the
same way reinforcement required in zone-1,zone-2 and zone-3 are 15.22, 15.87
and 17.5 tons for R equal to 8.
Figure 4.62: Total reinforcement in shear wall (R = 8 and 12)
4.4.3 Total Beam, Column and Shear wall Reinforcement
Total reinforcement required for beams, columns and shear walls of this
structure in three seismic zones for two values of R is shown in Figure 4.63.
The quantity of reinforcement for beam and column elements in zone-1, zone-2
and zone-3 are 175, 184 and 202 tons respectively for R equal to 8. In the same
way, 175, 182 and 194 tons are in zone-1, zone-2 and zone-3 respectively for R
equal to 12. Here, it is found that same quantity of reinforcement is required in
seismic zone-1 for both two values of R. It is indicating that there is no seismic
120
load effect on this structure for both values of R. So, this structure is designed
based on wind load combination in that zone.
Figure 4.63: Total reinforcement in three seismic zones (R = 8 and 12)
Reinforcement required in each square feet area of this structure for beam and
column elements in three seismic zones for the two different values of R is
shown in Figure 4.64. It is found that average reinforcement required for each
square feet in zone-1, zone-2 and zone-3 are 2.06, 2.25 and 2.42 kg
respectively for R equal to 8. Similarly, reinforcement required in each square
feet of this structure is 2.06, 2.13 and 2.30 kg in zone-1, zone-2 and zone-3
respectively for R equal to 12.
Reinforcement (kg/sft)
Figure 4.64: Reinforcement in each square feet of building (R = 8 and 12).
121
Reinforcement is compared in percentage among three seismic zones which is
shown in Figure 4.65. It is mainly carried out between zone-1 and zone-2,
zone-2 and zone-3 for two different values of R. Reinforcement required at
zone-2 is 9% and 5% more than that of zone-1 for equal to 8 and 12
respectively. Again, in the same way reinforcement required in zone-3 is 7%
and 6% more than zone-2 for R equal to 8 and 12 respectively.
Figure 4.65: Comparison of reinforcement between zone-1and 2, zone 2 and 3
4.2.5 Concrete Required in Beam and Column

Estimation is also carried out to find the variation of concrete in three seismic
zones for this structure. It is found that there is no effect on total volume of
concrete for changing the value of R in same seismic zone. Figure 4.66 shows
the total concrete required in this structure for the beams and columns in three
seismic zones, individually.
Figure 4.66: Comparison of concrete in three seismic zones
A comparison is carried out on concrete required in each square feet of this

structure for the beams and columns in three seismic zones. Figure 4.67 shows
122
the quantity of concrete required in each square feet for this in three seismic
zones.
Figure 4.67: Concrete in each square feet for three seismic zones
Finally, a comparison is also carried out for the requirement of concrete

between seismic zone 1 and zone 2, zone 2 and zone 3. Figure 4.68 shows the
variation of concrete of this structure in three seismic zones. It is found that
concrete required for zone-2 is 5% more than that of zone-1 and zone-3 is 7 %
more than that of zone-2
Figure 4.68: Comparison of concrete between zone-1 and 2, zone-2 and 3
123
CHAPTER – 4
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
4.1 General
To carry out this subject study, a height of structure is considered for two values of R
in three seismic zones. In this way, three different heights of structure are compared
individually, in three seismic zones. Each structure is analyzed, and designed
separately for comparison. Important features which are very much related with
analysis and design of this structure have been described in chapter three.
Comparisons are carried out on various aspects, such as analysis results, design
results, total quantity of materials and materials required in per square feet. These
comparisons are done for each height of structure in three seismic zones individually.
Results obtained from analysis are compared on storey displacement, storey drift,
base shear and weight of structure for three heights structures separately in three
seismic zones. Design results are compared on various structural elements, such as
beams, columns and shear walls. So, quantity of material has been estimated for these
structural elements of all selected structures separately. Materials required in per
square feet of the selected structures in three seismic zones are also calculated. It is to
be mentioned here that two types of material, reinforcement and concrete are
considered for this study.
Analysis, design and materials required for this structure have been carried out for
two different values of R individually in three seismic zones. In this section, initially
comparisons are carried out on analysis results such as storey displacement, storey
drift, weight of structure and base shear in three seismic zones for two different values
of R. It is mainly carried out to check the stability of this structure in three seismic
zones. Comparisons are also carried out on design result of this structure, to find out
the variation of construction materials due to seismic load, among three seismic zones
for two values of R. It is to be mentioned here that materials required for beams and
columns are estimated for comparing of this structure. It is compared on total quantity
of reinforcement and concrete required in this height of structure in three seismic
zones. Comparisons are also carried on materials required per square feet of this
structure in three seismic zones. Slab and footing of this height of structure are
79
designed and estimated by using SAFE software. It is found that the total
reinforcement required in slab is equal in each seismic zone separately. In the same
way, total footing reinforcement is also same in three seismic zones. So, the material
required for slab and footing are not considered in this study.
This structure is analyzed as a moment resisting frame. Here, constant wind velocity
is considered in three seismic zones. Loads are considered as per BNBC, 1993 which
has been discussed in chapter three. Results have compared on storey displacement,
storey drift, base shear and weight of structure for two values of R in three seismic
zones.
4.2.1.1 Storey Displacement
Storey displacement for lateral loads at X and Y-directions are shown in Figure 4.1 to
Figure 4.4 for two different values of R. Allowable displacement due to lateral loads
at different storey levels are also given to compare with actual displacements in three
seismic zones. It is observed that the displacements at different storey level due to
lateral load are less than its allowable limits in three seismic zones for both values of
R.
Storey (h/H)
Displacement (inch)
Figure 4.1: Storey displacement along X-direction (R=8)
80
Storey (h/H)
Allowable
Displacement (inch)
Figure 4.2: Storey displacement along X-direction (R=12)

Storey (h/H)
Displacement (inch)
Figure 4.3: Storey displacement along Y-direction (R=8)
81
Storey (h/H)
Allowable
Displacement (inch)
Figure 4.4: Storey displacement along Y-direction (R=12)
Storey Drift at different levels due to lateral loads in X and Y direction are shown in
Figure 4.5 to Figure 4.8 for three seismic zones. It is found that storey drift in zone-2
and zone-3 are very close to each other. Percentage of variation is more in zone-2 and
zone-3 with respect to zone-1. However, it is very small between zone-2 and zone-3.
It is to be highlighted here that allowable drift at different storey levels as per BNBC,
1993 are more than actual drift of this structure.
Storey (h/H)
Figure 4.5: Storey drift along X-direction (R=8)
82
Storey (h/H)
Storey (h/H)
Figure 4.6: Storey drift along X-direction (R=12)

Storey (h/H)
Figure 4.7: Storey drift along Y-direction (R=8)
83
Figure 4.8: Storey drift along Y-direction (R=12)
4.2.1.3 Weight and Base Shear
seismic zone. So, the value of R has no effect on weight of this structure in same
seismic zone. Lateral loads on this structure are not same in three seismic zones. So,
the sizes of the structural elements are required to change for controlling drift.
Therefore, the weight of this structure is not same in three seismic zones.
Figure 4.9: Weight of 90' structure in three seismic zones
84
Base shear of this structure is given in Figure 4.10 for two values of R in three seismic
zones.
Figure 4.10: Base shear in three seismic zones (R=8 and 12)
4.2.2 Comparison on Design Results
Reinforcement and concrete required in beams and columns have been estimated for
comparison of this structure in three seismic zones separately. A beam and a column
have been considered, to find out the difference of reinforcement due to seismic load.
Reinforcement and concrete are compared for beams and columns for two values of R
in three seismic zones. Design output of various structural elements has been given in
Appendix F.
4.2.2.1 Beam Reinforcement
To find out the variation of reinforcement for seismic load, a beam and a group of
beams have been designed in three seismic zones in both the cases, all design
parameters are same other than seismic zone coefficient. These comparisons are
carried out for two values of R. It is observed that the total quantity of beam
reinforcements is not same in three seismic zones for this structure. All beams of this
structure are not also designed based on same load combination. Detail structural
drawing for a beam and a column in seismic zone-2 is given in Appendix J.
A beam BC at Figure 4.11 is considered for comparing reinforcement among three

seismic zones. It is found that this beam is designed based on wind load and seismic
load combination in seismic zone-1 and seismic zone-3 respectively for both values of
85
R. But this beam is designed based on seismic load at seismic zone-2 for R equal to 8.
It is also found that at seismic zone-2, from 3rd to 7th floor this beam is designed
based on seismic load combination, rest floor beams are designed based on wind load
combination, when the value of R equal to 12.
A B C D E F G H
4
21'
3
20'
2
21'
1
14' 12' 14' 11' 14' 12' 14'
( a ) Plan
7TH FLOOR
10'
6TH FLOOR
10'
5TH FLOOR
10'
4TH FLOOR
10'
3RD FLOOR
10'
2ND FLOOR
10'
1ST FLOOR
10'
G. F.
Figure 4.11: A beam BC in three seismic zones.
86
Figure 4.12 shows the percentage of negative reinforcement required at various storey
levels for beam BC. It is observed from design result that the percentage of negative
reinforcement required at zone-2 is 10% more than zone-1 and at zone-3 is 22% more
than zone-2 for R equal 8. These percentages of variation are carried out based on
total negative reinforcement required at second floor level of this beam in three
seismic zones.
Storey (h/H)
Reinforcement (%)
Figure 4.12: Negative reinforcement in beam BC (R=8 and 12)
Figure 4.13 shows the percentage of positive reinforcement required at various storey
levels. It is also found that the percentage of positive reinforcement required at zone-2
is 25% more than that of zone-1 and at zone-3 is 20% more than that of zone-2 for R
equal to 8. These comparisons are based on total positive reinforcement required at
second floor levels in three seismic zones. Figure 4.13 also shows the reinforcement
required in this beam at zone-3 in different storey is more than other zones for R equal
12.
Storey (h/H)
Reinforcement (%)
Figure 4.13: Positive reinforcement in beam BC (R = 8 and 12)
87
Beams in Same Seismic Zone for Different Values of R
Three different beams AB, BC and CD are shown in Figure 4.14. It is considered to
find out the variation of reinforcement for two different values of R at seismic zone-2
and 3 separately.
A B C D E F G H
4
21'
3
20'
2
21'
1
14' 12' 14' 11' 14' 12' 14'
( a ) Plan
7TH FLOOR
10'
6TH FLOOR
10'
5TH FLOOR
10'
4TH FLOOR
10'
3RD FLOOR
10'
2ND FLOOR
10'
1ST FLOOR
10'
G. F.
Figure 4.14: A group of beams in same seismic zone for various R.
Figure 4.15 shows the percentage negative reinforcement required in this group of
beams at various storey levels in seismic zone-3 for two values of R. It is found that
reinforcement required in these beams is decreasing about 30 to 35 percentage when
R is changing from 8 to 12. These percentages are calculated based on total
reinforcement required at various storey levels in three seismic zones.
88
Storey (h/H)
Reinforcement (%)
Figure 4.15: Negative reinforcement at zone-3 for various beams (R = 8 and 12)
Figure 4.16 and Figure 4.17 show the negative and positive reinforcement in zone 2
for different values of R. These beams are taken for comparison at seismic zone-2 in
different storey levels. Here, it is found that the reinforcement required in these beams
are decreasing about 10 to 15 percent when R changing 8 to 12. Those beams are
design based on seismic load combination. It is found that reinforcements are
decreasing from 3rd floor to roof. It indicates that in seismic zone-2, from 3rd floors to
roof beams are designed based on seismic load and rest for wind load combination.
Storey (h/H)
Reinforcement (%)
Figure 4.16: Negative reinforcement at zone-2 for various beams (R = 8 and 12)
89
Storey (h/H)
Storey (h/H)
Reinforcement (%)
Figure 4.17: Positive reinforcement at zone-2 in different beams (R = 8 and 12)
Figure 4.18 shows the total reinforcement required in beams for this structure in three
seismic zones. It is observed that total reinforcement required in zone-1, zone-2 and
zone-3 are 40, 45 and 49 tons respectively for R equals to 8. Reinforcement has been
calculated using Microsoft Excel Software. Estimation for a beam element is given in
Appendix K. In the same way, reinforcement required in zone-1, zone-2 and zone-3
are 38, 41 and 43 tons for R equal to 12 respectively. Reinforcement required in beam
at zone-2 is 12%, 10% more than zone-1 and zone-3 is 9%, 6% more than zone-2 for
R equal to 8 and 12, respectively.
Zones
Figure 4.18: Total reinforcement in beams (R = 8 and 12).
90
4.2.2.2 Column Reinforcement
A column is considered for two different values of R in three seismic zones. Here,
analysis and design parameters for column elements are equal in three seismic zones,
only seismic zone coefficients are varied. The total quantity of reinforcement required
in three seismic zones is also estimated for two values of R. Detail structural drawing
of a column element is given in Appendix J.
A Column in Three Seismic Zones
A column (B1) considered for comparison is shown in Figure 4.19. Reinforcement

required for column in percentage is shown in Figure 4.20 and Figure 4.21. It is
observed that all columns in seismic zone-1 is designed based on wind load and in
seismic zone-3 is designed based on seismic load. But few columns in seismic zone-2
is designed based on both wind and seismic load combination.
A B C D E F G H
4
21'
3
20'
2
21'
1
14' 12' 14' 11' 14' 12' 14'
( a ) Plan
7TH FLOOR
10'
6TH FLOOR
10'
5TH FLOOR
10'
4TH FLOOR
10'
3RD FLOOR
10'
2ND FLOOR
10'
1ST FLOOR
10'
G. F.
Figure 4.19: A column in three seismic zones.
91
Storey (h/H)
Storey (h/H)
Figure 4.20: Reinforcement for selected column in three seismic zones (R = 8)
Figure 4.21: Reinforcement for selected column in three seismic zones (R = 12)
92
Total reinforcement required for column of this structure is given in Figure 4.22 for
the two different values of R. It is observed that reinforcement required in zone-2 is
25% and 21% more than that of zone-1 and at zone-3 is 20% and 11% more than that
of zone-2 for R equal to 8 and 12 respectively.
Figure 4.22: Total reinforcement for columns (R=8 and 12)
4.2.3 Total Reinforcement for Beam and Column
Total reinforcement required for beams and columns of this structure in three seismic
zones for two values of R is shown in Figure 4.23. The quantity of reinforcement for
beam and column elements in zone-1, zone-2 and zone-3 are 65, 75 and 85 tons
respectively for R equal to 8. In the same way, 65, 71 and 77 tons are in zone-1, zone-
2 and zone-3 respectively for R equal to 12. In percentage the reinforcement at zone-2
is 15% and 9% more than zone-1 and at zone-3 13% and 8% more than zone-2 for R
equal to 8 and 12 respectively. Here, it is found that the same quantity of
reinforcement is required in seismic zone-1 for both two values of R. It is indicating
that there is no seismic load effect on this structure for both values of R. So, this
structure is designed based on wind load combination in that zone.
93
Figure 4.23: Total reinforcement in three seismic zones (R=8 and 12)
Reinforcement required in each square feet area of this structure for beam and column
elements in three seismic zones for the two different values of R is shown in Figure
4.24. It is found that average reinforcement required for each square feet in zone-1,
zone-2 and zone-3 are 1.65, 1.90 and 2.12 kg respectively for R equal to 8. Similarly,
reinforcement required in each square feet of this structure is 1.65, 1.80 and 1.93 kg in
zone-1, zone-2 and zone-3 respectively for R equal 12.
Reinforcement (kg/sft)
Figure 4.24: Reinforcement required in each square feet (R = 8 and 12)
94
Reinforcement is compared in percentage at three seismic zones which is shown in

Figure 4.25. It is mainly carried out between zone-1 and zone-2, zone-2 and zone-3
for two different values of R. Reinforcement required at zone-2 is 15% and 11% more
than that of zone-1 for R equal to 8 and 12 respectively. Again, in the same way
reinforcement required in zone-3 is 14% and 9% more than zone-2 for R equal to 8
and 12 respectively.
Figure 4.25: Reinforcement comparison between zone-1 and zone-2, zone-2 and zone-3
4.2.5 Concrete Required in Beam and Column

Estimation is also carried out to find the variation of concrete in three seismic zones
for this structure. It is found that there is no effect on total volume of concrete for
changing the value of R in same seismic zone. Figure 4.26 shows the total concrete
required in this structure for the beams and columns in three seismic zones,
individually.
Figure 4.26: Comparison of total concrete among three seismic zones
95
A comparison is carried out on concrete required in each square feet of this structure
for the beams and columns in three seismic zones. Figure 4.27 shows the quantity of
concrete required in each square feet of this structure in three seismic zones.
Figure 4.27: Concrete required in each square feet for three seismic zones
Finally, a comparison is also carried out for the requirement of concrete between
seismic zone 1 and zone 2, zone 2 and zone 3. Figure 4.28 shows the variation of
concrete of this structure in three seismic zones. It is found that concrete required for
zone-2 is 3% more than that of zone-1and zone-3 is 7 % more than that of zone-2.
Figure 4.28: Comparison of concrete required between zone-1 and zone-2, zone-2 and
zone-3.
96
CHAPTER - 5
CONCLUSIONS
5.1 General
Earthquake is considered unavoidable for a long time. It was accepted earlier that
building would be damaged as a result of earthquake ground motion. Preventive
measures were therefore mostly limited to disaster management. The structural damages
observed during several earthquakes in the past are very educative. It is helpful in
selecting suitable design for earthquake performance level and also in identifying the
suitable structural systems. The traditional design approach to seismic design of a
building is a force-based design without any measure of the deformation capability of a
member or of a building.
The aim of this study is to increase the knowledge of the structural engineer about the
importance of proper consideration of structural system seismic in detailing for various
structural elements in three seismic zones in Bangladesh. It also gives an idea to a
structural engineer about quantity of material required for same structure in three seismic
zones. It will inspire a structural engineer to use proper seismic load and detailing for
different seismic zones as he knows the variation of costing before.
5.2 Conclusion of the Study
To achieve the aim of this study, three different heights of structure 90 Feet (27.43
meter), 120 Feet (36.37 meter) and 150 Feet (45.72 meter) have been selected for two
values of R (8, 12). A building of 90 feet height is considered as moment resisting frame
and other two heights of building are considered as dual system. Constant wind load (200
km/hour) is considered for all these structures and other loads are considered as per
BNBC, 1993. Beam, column and shear wall elements are designed and estimated to find
out the variation of materials (concrete, reinforcement) of each structure in three seismic
zones separately. Each structure is analyzed, designed and estimated in three seismic
zones for both values of R. ETABS 9.5 and SAFE 8.1.0 software are used for analysis
and design of various structural elements. Slab and foundation are designed and
estimated by SAFE software only for 90 feet (27.43 meter) height structure. After an
extensive and systematic study, the following conclusions could be derived as per height
of the structure:
124
a) 90 feet (27.43 meter) height structure
The structural elements are designed based on wind load combination in seismic zone-1
for both values of R. In seismic zone-2 most of the elements are designed based on
seismic load and few are on wind load combination for R equal 8. In this seismic zone
few elements are designed based on seismic load and few are on wind load combination
for R equal 12. In seismic zone-3 all structural elements are designed by seismic load
combination for R equal 8. But, very few structural elements are designed by wind load
combination for R equal 12 in this seismic zone. Variations of materials for two values of
R in three seismic zones are given below:
(1) Total reinforcement (Beams and columns) required at zone-2 is 15% more than
zone-1 and zone-3 is 13% more than zone-2 for R equal to 8. Similarly, at zone-2 is
9% more than zone-1 and zone-3 is 8% more than zone-2 for R equal to 12.
(2) Average reinforcement required in each square feet of this structure is 1.65, 1.90
and 2.12 kg for beams and column in zone-1, zone-2 and zone-3 respectively for R
equal to 8. In the same way, reinforcement required in each square feet is 1.65, 1.80
and 1.93 kg in zone-1, zone-2 and zone-3 respectively for R equal to 12.
(3) It is found that there is no effect on total quantity of concrete for changing the
value of R in a seismic zone. But concrete required at zone-2 is 5% more than zone-1
and zone-3 is 7% more than zone-2.
(4) Slab and footing are designed and estimated by using SAFE software of this
structure. It is found that the total reinforcement required for slab is equal in each
seismic zone separately. In the same way, total footing reinforcement is also same in
three seismic zones individually. Reinforcement required for slab and footing are
given in Appendix L
b) 120 feet (36.37 meter) height structure
In seismic zone-1 all structural elements are designed based on wind combination for
both values of R. In seismic zone-2, few elements are designed by wind load combination
and few are by seismic combination for R equal 8. But most of the elements are designed
based on wind load combination for R equal 12 in this zone. In seismic zone-3 most of
the elements are designed by seismic load combination and very few by wind load
125
combination for R equal 8. Similarly elements are designed by seismic and wind load
combination, separately for R equal 12 in this zone. Variations of materials for two
values of R in three seismic zones are given below:
(1) Total reinforcement required for beams, columns and shear walls at zone-2 is
11% more than zone-1 and zone-3 is 9% more than zone-2 for R equal 8. In the same
way, at zone-2 is 7% more than zone-1 and zone-3 is 6% more than zone-2 for R
equal 12.
and 2.30 kg for beams, columns and shear walls in zone-1, zone-2 and zone-3
respectively for R equal 8. In the same way, reinforcement required in each square
feet is 1.90, 2.02and 2.13 kg in zone-1, zone-2 and zone-3 respectively for R equal to
12.
value of R in a same seismic zone. Concrete required at zone-2 is 4% more than of
zone-1 and zone-3 is 6% more than zone-2.
c) 150 feet (45.72 meter) height structure
In seismic zone-1 all structural elements are designed based on wind load combination
for both values of R. In seismic zone-2, few elements are designed by seismic load
combination and few are by wind combination for R equal 8. But very few elements are
designed by seismic load combination in this zone for R equal 12. In seismic zone-3 most
of the elements are designed by seismic load combination and very few by wind load
combination for R equal 8. Similarly elements are designed seismic and wind load
combination, separately for R equal 12 in this zone. Variations of materials for two
values of R in three seismic zones are given below:
(1) Total reinforcement required for beams, columns and shear walls at zone-2 is 9%
more than zone-1 and zone-3 is 7% more than zone-2 for R equal 8. In the same way,
at zone-2 is 5% more than zone-1 and zone-3 is 6% more than zone-2 for R equal 12.
and 2.42 kg for beams and columns and shear walls in zone-1, zone-2 and zone-3
126
respectively for R equal 8. In the same way reinforcement required in each square
feet is 2.06, 2.16 and 2.30 kg in zone-1, zone-2 and zone-3 respectively for R equal to
12.
value of R in a same seismic zone. Concrete required at zone-2 is 4% more than of
zone-1 and zone-3 is 6% more than zone-2.
d) It is observed that when height of the structures is increased, in that case more
structural elements are designed based on wind combination. So, seismic load has more
effect comparatively on low height structures.
e) It is found that weight of a structure is gradually increased from seismic zone-1 to

seismic zone-3. The weight of a structure has to be increased for controlling displacement
due to seismic load. It is comparatively more for 90 feet height structure in this study.
f) It is observed that when a beam is designed by seismic load combination the

increment of positive reinforcement at higher seismic zone is comparatively higher than
negative reinforcement.
g) It is found that when the values of R are changed in a seismic zone, reinforcement
is also changed and percentage of the change is related with height. It is more for
comparatively low height structure.
h) It is observed that the percentage of reinforcement cost is more than concrete in
different seismic zones for constructing seismic resistance structure.
j) Average reinforcement and concrete required in per square feet have been
calculated separately from above result for three seismic zones. It is found that average
reinforcement required in per square feet for a building is 1.87, 2.09 and 2.29 kg in zone-
1, zone-2 and zone-3 for R equal to 8 respectively. In the same way, reinforcement
required in per square feet for a building is 1.87, 1.98 and 2.12 kg in zone-1, zone-2 and
zone-3 for R equal to 12 respectively. Similarly, concrete required in per square feet for a
building is 0.30, 0.32 and 0.34 cft in zone-1, zone-2 and zone-3 respectively.
127
5.3 Recommendation for Future Studies
The following recommendations for future study can be made from the present study:
a. Present study has been done for two types of structural system. Further studies
can be done for other structural systems which are given in BNBC, 1993.
b. This study has been done only for regular structure. Future studies can be also
done for various irregular structures.
c. In the present study constant bearing capacity of soil is considered for 90 feet
height structure in three seismic zones. In future, similar studies may be performed for
various bearing capacity of soil.
d. In the present study, during analysis a constant wind load has been considered for
three seismic zones. In future study various wind load may be included (especially for
costal area).
128
References:
Aini (2007), “Earthquake risk analysis for Chittagong City” M.Sc Thesis, Bangladesh
University of Engineering and Technology, Dhaka.
Ali, M. H. (1998), “Earthquake Database and seismic Zoning of Bangladesh”,

INCEDE Report II Bangkok.
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) (2003), “Commentary structural Design

criteria” Chapter 4, PP-36-58.
Applied Technology Council (1995) ATC-19 “Structural response modification

factors”. Redwood City, CA: Author.
Applied Technology Council (1978), ATC-306 “Tentative provisions for the

development of seismic regulations for buildings”. Redwood City, CA: Author.
Ashjal, B.M. (1997), “Seismic Risk map of Iran” Geological Survey of Iran PP-121-
148
Atkinson, T. G. and Kiland, P. J. (2004), “The evolution and history of SEAOC, a

celebration of 75 years of history, 1929 to 2004”. Retrieved January 18, 2010, from
Structural Engineers Association of Southern California.
Banglapedia Encyclopedia (2004), National Encyclopedia for Bangladesh CD-ROM,

February 2004, Asiatic Society of Bangladesh.
Bangladesh National Building Code (BNBC, 1993), Housing and Building Research
Institute, Bangladesh Standard and Testing Institution, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Beavers, J. E. (2002), “A review of seismic hazard description in U.S. design codes

and procedures”. Progress in Structural Engineering and Materials, 4 (1), 46-63.
Bilham, R. V. Gaut, K. and Mdnar, P (2001), “Himalayan Seismic Hazard”

SCIENCE, Volume 293.
Bolt, B.A. (1987), “Site Specific Study of Seismic Intensity and ground motion
Parameters for Proposed Jamuna river bridge, Bangladesh, Report on Jamuna bridge
study”.
Bolt, B.A. (1991), Earthquake, Fourth Edition, W.H Freeman and company, New
York, USA.
Building Officials Conference of America (1950), Basic building code, 1950 edition.
New York.
Campbell, K. W. (1997), Empirical near source attenuation relationships for

horizontal and vertical components of Peck Ground Acceleration peak Ground
Velocity and pseudo Absolute Acceleration Response spectra seismic Res. Lett.
Volume 68, pp. 154-179.
129
Coleman, J. M. (1969), “Brahmaputra river, Channel Processes and Sedimentation”,
Sedimentary Geology, special Issue, 3 (2/3) 131-237.
ETABS, ETABS Nonlinear Version 9.5.0, Computers and Structures, Inc, 1995
University Ave, Berkeley, California, USA.
Geological Survey of Bangladesh (GSB) (1990), “Geological map of Bangladesh”.

Ghosh, S.K, Domel, A.W (1992), “Design of Concrete Building for Earthquke &
Wind Forces “ Skokie, Illinois.
Ghosh, S. K. (2004). Update on the NEHRP Provisions: the resource document for
seismic design. PCI Journal, 49 (3), pp. 96-102.
Ghosh, S. K. and Domel, A.W. (1992), “Design of Concrete Building for Earthquake
and Wind Forces”, International Conference of Building Officials, 5360, South
Workman Mill Road, Whittier, California 90601.
Guta, D. K. (1978), “Tectonic frame work and oil and gas Prospect of Bangladesh”
Proc, 4th Conference Bangladesh Geological.
Hamilton, R. M. (2003), “Milestones in earthquake research”. Retrieved January 25,

2010, from Geotimes.
Hattori, S. (1979), “Bulletion of the International Institute of Seismology and

Earthquake Engineering Building Research Institute”, Ministry of Construction,
Tokyo; Japan.
Hoque, M and Watney, L. (1982), “Tectonic Setup of Bangladesh and its relation to
hydrocarbon accumulation phase-I, centre for Policy Research University of Dhaka”,
PP-177
Hossain, K. M. (1989), “Seismicity and Tectonics of Bangladesh”, Department of

Geology Dhaka University, Dhaka-1000, Bangladesh.
Hossain, K. M. and Akter, S. H. (1983), “Structural behavior of the sitakund Hill”,

Bangladesh J. Geol 2. pp 17-27
Islam, M. R. (2005), “Seismic loss Estimation for Sylhet City” MSc. Engineering
Project BUET, Dhaka.
Khan & Rahman (2004), “Reinforced Concrete Manual and Building Plan”, Second
Edition, Farah Publication, 38, Naya Paltan, Motijheel, Dhaka-1000.
Kessler, S. (2010), “A Study of the Seismic Response Modification Factor for Log
Shear Walls”, Thesis, M.Sc Engg, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas
Kramer, S. (2008), “Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering”, Dorling kindersley

(India) Pvt. Ltd.,Licensees of pearson Education in south Asia.
Line, P. (2006), “Benchmarking seismic base shear to historical practice”. American

Wood Council , 5.
130
Masud, M. A. (2007), “Earthquake Risk Analysis for Chittagong City”, M. Thesis
BUET.
Middlemiss, C. S. (1885), “Report on the Bengal Earthquake of 14th July, 1885”,

Records of Geological Survey of India, Volume 18, PP 201-220.
Mitra, R. N. (1971), “Tectonics of the frontal folded belt of Tripura – Surma Vallely”
Bull of ONGC (8 (2). 71-75
Molnar, P. and Tapponier, P. (1975), “Cenozoic tectonics of Asia, effects of a

continental collision.” Science Volume 189 (8) PP 419-426.
Murty, C. V. R. (2005), “Earthquake Tips”. Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur,

India.
Nilson, Arthur. H, David Darwin and Charles W. Dolan (2003), “Design of Concrete
structure”, Thirteen Edition, McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc, 1221 Avenue of the
Americas, New York, Ny 10020.
Oldham, R. D. (1899), Report of the great Indian earthquake of 12th June, 1987,
Memoir of Geological Survey of Indian.
Robert, C. I. (1989), “Cost Estimating Principal”, ASCE Journal of Construction

Engineering and Management.
SAFE, SAFE Plus W/Detailer Version 8.1.0, Computers and Structures, Inc., 1995
University Ave, Berkeley, California, USA.
Sarfuddin (2001), “Earthquake intensity attenuation relationship for Bangladesh and

its surrounding region.” M.Sc Thesis, Bangladesh University of Engineering and
Technology, Dhaka.
Schueller (1977), “High-Rise Building Structure”, A wiley-Inter science Publication,

JOHN Wiley & Sons, New York, PP 15-59.
Smith and Coull (1991), “Tall Building Structures analysis and Design”, John Wiley
& Sons.Inc., USA.
Structural Engineers Association of California (SEAOC), (2007), SEAOC blue book -

seismic design recommendations preface to the Blue Book online. Retrieved January
18, 2010, from Structural Engineers Association of California Blue Book online.
VARELA, TANNER, KLINGNER (2004), “Development of Response Modification

Coefficient and Deflection Amplification factor for Design of AAC Structural
Systems”, 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering Vancouver, b.c;
Canada.
VERNEY, P. (1979), The earthquake Hand book, Paddington Press, New York.
Wikipedia, org. (2005) “Encyclopedia” Seismic analysis.
131
APPENDIX A
Comparison of R through code updates (1978-2005)
Type of Structural ATC-3 NEHRP UBC - UBC IBC (2000) ASCE 7 IBC
System 06 (1985) Rw (1997) NEHRP (1998) (2006)
(1978) (1994) (1997) (2000) ASCE 7
(2005)
Bearing Wall Systems
Light framed walls 6.5 6.5 6 4.5 6.5 6 6.5
with shear panels
Reinf concrete shear 4.5 4.5 6 4.5 4 4 4
walls
Reinf. masonry 3.5 3.5 6 4.5 2 2 2
shear walls
Unreinf/ partially 1.25 1.25 - - 1.5 1.5 1.5
reinf masonry shear
walls
Building Frame Systems
Light framed walls 7 7 7 5.0 7 6.5 7
with shear panels
Reinforced concrete 5.5 5.5 8 5.5 5 5 5
shear walls
Reinforced masonry 4.5 4.5 8 5.5 2.5 2.5 2
shear walls
Braced frames 5 5 8 5.6 5 5 3.25
Unreinf/partially 1.5 1.5 - - 1.5 1.5 1.5
reinf masonry shear
walls
Moment Resisting Frame System
Special steel 8 8 12 8.5 8 8 8
moment frames
Special reinforced 7 8 12 8.5 8 8 8
conc. moment
frames
Ordinary steel 4.5 4.5 6 4.5 4 4 3.5
moment frames
Ordinary reinforced 2 2 5 3.5 3 3 3
conc. moment
frames
Dual System
Reinforced concrete 8 8 12 8.5 7 7 7
shear walls
Reinforced masonry 6.5 6.5 8 5.5 7 7 5.5
shear walls
Wood sheathed 8 8 - - - - -
shear panels
Braced frames 6 6 10 6.5 8 6 7
Source: Samantha Kessler (2010), Thesis, M.Sc Engg, Kansas State University
132
APPENDIX B
Seismic Zone Coefficients, z
Zone Zone Coefficient, Z Comments

1 0.075 Low earthquake zone
2 0.15 Moderate earthquake zone
3 0.25 Severe earthquake zone
Source: BNBC, 1993 Table 6.2.2.22
133
APPENDIX C
Structure Importance Coefficients, I
Structure Importance Category Structure Importance Coefficients, I

I Essential Facilities 1.25
II Hazardous Facilities 1.25
III Special Occupancy Structures 1.00
IV Standard Occupancy Structures 1.00
V Low risk Structure 1.00
Source: BNBC, 1993 Table 6.2.2.23
134
APPENDIX D
Response Modification Coefficient for Structural System, R
Basic Structural Lateral Force Resisting System - Description R(2)

System
a. Bearing Wall 1. Light framed walls with shear panels
System i) Plywood walls for structures, 3 storey’s or less 8
ii) All other light framed walls 6
2. Shear walls
i) Concrete 6
ii) Masonry 6
3. Light steel framed bearing walls with tension only bracing 4
4. Braced frames where bracing carries gravity loads
i) Steel 6
ii) Concrete (3) 4
iii) Heavy timber 4
b. Building Frame 1. Steel eccentric braced frame (EBF) 10
System 2. Light framed walls with shear, panels
i} Plywood walls for structures 3-storeys or less 9
ii) All other light framed walls 7
3. Shear walls
i) Concrete 8
ii) Masonry 8
4. Concentric braced frames (CBF)
i) Steel 8
ii) Concrete (3) 8
iii) Heavy timber 8
c. Moment 1. Special moment resisting frames (SMRF)
Resisting Frame i) Steel 12
System ii) Concrete 12
2. Intermediate moment resisting frames (IMRF), concrete(4) 8
3. Ordinary moment resisting frames (OMRF)
i) Steel 6
ii) in Concrete (5) 5
d. Dual System 1. Shear. walls
i) Concrete with steel or concrete SMRF 12
ii) Concrete with steel OMRF 6
iii) Concrete with concrete IMRF (4) 9
iv) Masonry with steel or concrete SMRF 8
v) Masonry with steel OMRF 6
vi) Masonry with concrete IMRF (3) 7
2, Steel Eccentric Braced Frame (EBF)
i) With steel SMRF 12
ii) With steel OMRF 6
3. Concentric braced frame (CBF)
i) Steel with steel SMRF 10
ii) Steel with steel OMRF 6
iii) Concrete with concrete SMRF (3) 9
iv) Concrete with concrete IMRF (3) 6
e. Special Structural See Sec 1.3.2, 1.3.3, 1.3.5
Systems.
Notes: (1) Basic Structural Systems are defined in Sec 1.3.2, Chapter 1.
(2) See Sec 2.5.6.6 for combination of structural systems, and Sec 1.3.5 for system limitations.
(3) Prohibited in Seismic Zone 3.
(4) Prohibited in Seismic Zone 3 except as permitted in Sec 2.5.9.3.
(5) Prohibited in Seismic Zones 2 and 3. Sec 1.7.2.6.
Source: BNBC, 1993 Table 6.2.24
135
APPENDIX E
Modeling with Frame and Shell Element Using Finite Element Method
The physical structural members in a structural model are represented by objects. The
geometry of an object is assign properties and loads to the object to completely define
the model of the physical member. For analysis purpose ETABS, SAFE converts each
object into one or more elements. The term element will be used more often than
object, since what is described herein is the finite-element analysis portion of the
program that operates on the element-based analysis model. However, it should be
clear that the properties described here for elements are actually assigned in the
interface to the objects and the conversion to analysis elements is automatic.
The Frame element is a very powerful element that can be used to model beams,
columns, braces, and trusses in planar and three-dimensional structures. It includes the
effects of biaxial bending, torsion, axial deformation, and bi axial shear deformations.
The Shell element is a type of area object that is used to model membrane, plate, and
shell behavior in planar and three-dimensional structures. The Shell element is a three
or four node formulation that combines membrane and plate bending behavior.
Frame Element
The Frame element is used to model beam-column and truss behavior in planar and
three-dimensional structures. The Frame element can also be used to model cable
behavior when nonlinear properties are added (e.g., tension only, large deflections).
This element will often be referred to simply as the frame element, although it can
always be used for cable analysis. The Frame element uses a general, three-
dimensional, beam-column formulation which includes the effects of biaxial bending,
torsion, axial deformation, and biaxial shear deformations (Wilson, 1976).
A Frame element is modeled as a straight line connecting two points. In the graphical
user interface, you can divide curved objects into multiple straight objects, subject to
your specification. Each element has its own local coordinate system (Figure E.1) for
defining section properties and loads, and for interpreting output.
136
Figure E.1: Frame element in local coordinate system
The element may be prismatic or non-prismatic. The non-prismatic formulation lows

the element length to be divided into any number of segments over which properties
may vary. The variation of the bending stiffness may be linear, parabolic, or cubic
over each segment of length. The axial, shear, tensional, mass, and weight properties
all vary linearly over each segment.
Insertion points and end offsets are available to account for the finite size of beam and
column intersections. The end off sets may be made partially or fully rigid to model
the stiffening effect that can occur when the ends of an element are embedded in
beam and column intersections. End releases are also available to model different
fixity conditions at the ends of the element. Each Frame element may be loaded by
gravity (in any direction), multiple concentrated loads, multiple distributed loads,
strain loads, and loads due to temperature change (Figure E.2).
137
Figure E.2: Frame elements with internal force
Element internal forces are produced at the ends of each element and at a user
specified number of equally spaced output stations along the length of the element.
Cable behavior is modeled using the frame element and adding the appropriate
features.
The Shell Element
The Shell element is used to model shell, membrane, and plate behavior in planar and
three-dimensional structures. The shell element is one type of area object. Depending
on the type of section properties, the object could also be used to model plane
stress/strain and axsymmetric solid behavior. The Shell element is a three - or four -
node formulation that combines separate membrane and plate- bending behavior. A
shell element with three nodes is given below (Figure E.3).
138
Figure E.3: Shell elements with three nodes
The four- joint element does not have to be planar (Figure E.4). The membrane
behavior uses an isoperimetric formulation that includes translational in-plane
stiffness components and a rotational stiffness component in the neither direction
normal to the plane of the element (Taylor 1985, and Ibrahim 1991).
Figure E.4: Shell elements with four nodes
139
The plate bending behavior includes two-way, out-of-plane, plate rotational stiffness
components and a translational stiffness component in the direction normal to the
plane of the element. By default, a thin-plate (Kirchhoff) formulation is used that
neglects transverse shearing deformation. Optionally, may choose a thick-plate
formulation which includes the effects of transverse shearing deformation. Structures
that can be modeled with this element include:
a) Three- dimensional shells, such as tanks and domes

b) Plate structures, such as floor slabs
c) Membrane structures, such as shear walls
For each Shell element in the structure, choose to model pure membrane, pure plate,
or full shell behavior. It is generally recommended that use the full shell behavior
unless the entire structure is planar and is adequately restrained.
Each Shell element has its own local coordinate system for defining material
properties and loads (Figure E.5) and for interpreting output. Temperature- dependent,
orthotropic material properties are allowed. Each element may be loaded by gravity
and uniform loads in any direction; surface pressure on the top, bottom and side faces;
and loads due to temperature change.
Figure E.5: Shell elements local coordinate with materials
A variable, four-to-eight-point numerical integration formulation is used for the Shell

stiffness. Stresses and internal forces and moments, in the element local coordinate
140
system, are evaluated at the 2- by-2 Gauss integration points and extrapolated to the
joints of the element. An approximate error in the element stresses or internal forces
can be estimated from the difference in values calculated from different elements
attached to a common joint. This will give an indication of the accuracy of a given
finite- element approximation and can then be used as the basis for the selection of a
new and more accurate finite element mesh (Figure E.6).
Triangular Region Circular Region
Infinite Region Mesh Transition
Figure E.6: Shell elements with mesh
The Plane Element
The Plane element is used to model plane-stress and plane-strain behavior in two-
dimensional solids. The Plane element is one type of area object. Depending on the
type of section properties assign to an area, the object could also be used to model
shell and ax symmetric solid behavior.
The Plane element is a three- or four-node element for modeling two-dimensional

solids of uniform thickness. It is based upon an isoperimetric formulation that
includes four optional in compatible bending modes. The element should be planar; if
it is not, it is formulated for the projection of the element upon an average plane
calculated for the element. The incompatible bending modes significantly improve the
bending behavior of the element if the element geometry is of a rectangular form.
Improved behavior is exhibited even with non-rectangular geometry. Structures that
can be modeled with this element include:
a) Thin, planar structures in a state of plane stress
141
b) Long, prismatic structures in a state of plane strain
The stresses and strains are assumed not to vary in the thickness direction. For plane-
stress, the element has no out-of-plane stiffness. For plane-strain, the element can
support loads with anti-plane shear stiffness. Each Plane element has its own local
coordinate system for defining material properties and loads, and for interpreting out
put. Temperature dependent, orthotropic material properties are allowed. Each
element may be loaded by gravity (in any direction); surface pressure on the side
faces; pore pressure within the element; and loads due to temperature change.
142

A Comparative Study On Construction Cost of Same Structural System in Different Seismic Zones of Bangladesh PDF

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

A Comparative Study On Construction Cost of Same Structural System in Different Seismic Zones of Bangladesh PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON CONSTRUCTION COST OF SAME

STRUCTURAL SYSTEM IN DIFFERENT SEISMIC ZONES

MD. SOEBUR RAHMAN

MASTER OF SCIENCE IN ENGINEERING

(CIVIL & STRUCTURAL)

DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING

Signature of the Candidate

Name of the Candidate

The author is grateful to Major General Hameed-Al-Hasan, ndc, Commandant, MIST,

Geographical location of Bangladesh makes it ideally suited to natural disasters.

CHAPTER-2 LITERATURE REVIEW

2.4 Seismic Hazards 15

2.5 Seismic Zoning of Bangladesh 21

2.6 Structural System and Response Modification Coefficient 31

2.7 Seismic Effect and Force on Structure 41

2.8 Earthquake Design Philosophy and Detailing 52

2.9 Estimating and Costing 68

CHAPTER – 3 SELECTED STRUCTURES

3.2 Design Criteria 71

3.3 Structural Stability 73

4.2 90 Feet (27.43 meter) Height Structure 79

4.3 120 Feet (36.37 meter) Height Structure 97

4.4 150 Feet (45.72 meter) Height Structure 111

5.1 General 124

Table No Description Page

2.1 Attenuation Laws 17

2.2 Significant Seismic Sources and Maximum (Bolt, 1987) 20

2.3 Operational Basis Earthquake, Maximum Credible Earthquake 20

3.1 Load Combinations 72

Figure No Description Page

2.1 Inside the earth 9

bar no of Beam no of Beam no of lap total dim. & weight

Total = 0.00 9.47 0.00 60.40 11.32 0.00 0.00

2) Rainforcement of Beam 1st Floor Roof

Total = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3) Rainforcement of Beam 2nd Floor Roof

Total = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

4) Rainforcement of Beam 3rd Floor Roof

Total = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

5) Rainforcement of Beam 4th Floor Roof

Total = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

6) Rainforcement of Beam 5th Floor Roof

7) Rainforcement of Beam 6th Floor Roof

Total = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

8) Rainforcement of Beam 7th Floor Roof

Total = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

9) Rainforcement of Beam 8th Floor Roof

Total = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

10) Rainforcement of Beam 9th Floor Roof

Total = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

11) Rainforcement of Beam 10th Floor Roof

Total = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

12) Rainforcement of Beam 11th Floor Roof

Total = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

13) Rainforcement of Beam 12th Floor Roof

Total = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

14) Rainforcement of Beam 13th Floor Roof

Total = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Total = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

16) Rainforcement of Beam 15th Floor Roof

Total = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

17) Rainforcement of Beam 16th Floor Roof

Total = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 748.44