Religion Politics -Activities that relate to influencing the actions and policies of a government or getting and keeping power in a government
The work or job of people (such as elected
officials) who are part of a government
the opinions that someone has about what
should be done by governments : a person's political thoughts and opinions • Religion A religion is an organized collection of beliefs, cultural systems, and world views that relate humanity to an order of existence. Many religions have narratives, symbols, and sacred histories that aim to explain the meaning of life, the origin of life, or the Universe. Introduction The separation of church and politics is a description for the distance in the relationship between organized religion and the nation state. It may refer to creating a secular state, with or without explicit reference to such separation, or to changing an existing relationship of church involvement in a state (disestablishment). A similar but typically stricter principle of laïcité has been applied in France and Turkey, while some socially secularized countries such as Denmark and the United Kingdom have maintained constitutional recognition of an official state religion. The concept parallels various other international social and political ideas, including, secularism, disestablishmentaria- nism, religious liberty, and religious pluralism. Religion should not mixed with the politics as the politician are taking benefit of its for getting the votes should give the votes by judging the person by education, leadership skill, behavior and not by the which caste he belongs weather he belong to our caste and all after electing him he should work for all religion he should not work for only a single community or religion weather he can try to improve our country our state our district. • The concept of separation of church and state refers to the distance in the relationship between organized religion and the nation state. • The concept of separation has since been adopted in a number of countries, to varying degrees depending on the applicable legal structures and prevalent views toward the proper role of religion in society. • The discussion over the separation of church and state is often connected with the general divide between the concepts of secularism and theocracy.
• Secularism is not atheism (lack of belief in
God) and nor is it humanism (a nonreligious belief system). It is a political movement seeking the separation of religion and government, and eliminating discrimination on the basis of religion. • Secularism is often associated with the age of Enlightenment in Europe and plays a major role in Western society. Many secularists are religious and many religious people – recognising the value of keeping religion and government separate – are secular. • They do not see this as an anti-religious development and, indeed, the Lutheran church has endorsed the process. • Pope Benedict XVI has spoken in recent years about “positive” secularism, and a “new” secularism friendly to religion. • What the Pope pretend not to know is that there is no positive or negative secularism. It is neutral. It is neither a dogma nor a doctrine. It’s an abstention. Secularism abstains from favoring one religion over another, or favoring atheism over religious belief. It is a political principle that aims at guaranteeing the largest possible coexistence of various freedoms. • The forefathers also saw the dangers of an established church or religion for the liberties and equality of those outside that religion. • Religion is strong in America, but no single religion or denomination has direct control over state mechanisms. Religious voices are heard loud and clear, and their influence is felt in the corridors of power. But no religion has any ultimate sanction in the sphere of temporal politics. My concern about the almost hopeless co entanglement of religion and politics centers on the tyranny of the majority . A true democracy is meant to hold, honor, and defend and encourage diversity , plurality. The whole idea of majority rule goes against the very principle, defeats it even though our constitution presumably guarantees that. Conclusion
We have to move away from a two
party system where majority rules to a more pluralistic multi party system where the majority by party ideology cannot rule or control, where collaboration not caucuses is the deliberative process, where the common wisdom can emerge, where our laws and government policies really can manifest what our constitution guarantees. • http://www.e-ir.info/2012/06/14/should- politics-and-religion-be-kept-separate/