Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Bezalel Gavish
Information Technology and Operations Management
Southern Methodist University
Dallas, TX 75205
gavishb2000@yahoo.com
1
The Journal Editorial Structure
Baltzer
Kluwer
Publisher
Springer(10
(4(5years)
years)
years)
Editor in Chief
Administrative Assistant
2
Review Process - Steps and Duration
• The author/s submits the paper
• The administrative assistant (AA) checks that all
formal requirements have been satisfied
– In our case, affiliations, Email addresses, Point of contact, abstract,
format of paper, bibliographies (format and order), biographies and
statement
– Sent back for formal corrections
– AA asks the EIC for an AE
• The EIC provides 3 potential AEs (ordered)
• The AA sends the paper to the 1st, 2nd, 3rd AE until an
AE agrees to handle the review
• The AE finds 3 reviewers that agree to review the
paper (sometimes he rejects on his own)
3
The Review Process is not Perfect
The review process can’t be perfect
After all it consists of human beings who are not
perfect
It is rare that rejections are done out of malice
I know of one case, a very famous person reviewed a paper for me in a
top journal
He wrote a 12 page dense review justifying a rejection
The author complained and explained the situation
I sent his paper directly to 5 reviewers
The paper was published
The famous person does not speak with me anymore
The case of Prof. Christofides, developed what is one
of the most important results in heuristics and
combinatorial optimization
He submitted it to Operations Research
The EIC (Prof. Nemhouser) rejected it because it was too short (2
pages of printed material)
My first paper, a reviewers group set on it for 2 years
4
Structure of a Good Research
• Do your research
– Prepare a draft of a paper
– Prepare a presentation of the research and results
– Present and receive feedback
• Show your results to a few known researchers in the
field that you trust their integrity and ask for their
comments (acknowledge their help in the acknowledgement
section)
– Revise the paper (acknowledge feedback)
• Give a few presentations in good institutions and
receive feedback
– Revise the paper (acknowledge feedback)
• Select the appropriate journal (quality and target
audience)
– Format and style the paper to the target Journal
• Submit for publication and pray
5
Structure of a Good Paper
Spend time selecting the target journal
Study the journal, its style and format of papers
Select an informative and attractive title
Abstract – What is new and important in the paper
Introduction and literature review – be expensive and give
credit to earlier research
Describe and explain the research (clearly)
Describe the results, make clear what is new (yours)
Describe what are the implications of your results
Propose open questions and directions for future research
Provide acknowledgements to everyone who helped,
commented on your paper and research
Bibliography according to the journal policy
If 30 is the typical number, provide around 30 references
References should be relevant to the paper and cited
Try to imagine a relevant reviewer who does not see his relevant
paper in your references
6
Errors made During the Submission
Process
Not providing everything asked for on the journal web
site
Primary contact person
Biographies
Affiliations, emails of authors
Copies of relevant self publications
Acknowledgments to Deans, spiritual leaders
indicates politics and not science, a no no
Acknowledging financial support is fine
Providing a list of AEs, Reviewers for the paper
Cover letter addressed to other journals
Plagiarism !!!!!!!
7
Plagiarism
How we handle it in our journals (first offense)?
When a paper arrives from a list of problematic
countries or institutions
We send the submitting author a letter with an option
to withdraw the paper without direct penalty
We state that if they continue and the paper is flagged as
plagiarism
We will send a letter stating it to the Dean, President of his
institution letting them to deal with it.
Most plagiarists withdraw the paper
Most plagiarisms are caught by the reviewers
Excellent tools exist to catch plagiarism, graph
isomorphism and other methods exist. They are
becoming better over time.
8
The Authors Dilemma
The
Big
Elephant
In
The
Room
9
The Competitive Dilemma Faced by an
Author
How many research oriented departments exist in
a field?
Globaly around 500
On average how many researchers exist in each
department?
Roughly 5
Each department requires 1 to 2 papers published
per year in a top ranked journal (we will use 1.5
articles per year)
Thus the aggregate demand in a field is for
500x5x1.5 = 3750 published articles
per year
10
The Competitive Dilemma Faced by an
Author
How do we bridge that gap between?
The demand The supply
3750 720
When the requirement is for one paper/year
2500 720
This is an impossible situation.
Some ideas:
Do research and publish with other authors
Each author can count it in his reports
Submit only high quality research results
Try to develop new methods to evaluate the
research potential of faculty members
11
How to Encourage Top Rank
Publications by Faculty
Reward faculty for top rank journal publications
Salary raises
Publication Awards
Teaching professors versus research faculty
Participation in international conferences
Most conference publications do not count at
all at top US universities
Lower teaching and administrative tasks on
productive research faculty
Citations and impact indexes are good for a
first cut of journal rankings
12
Tell The world about your existance
World means:
Leading figures in the field
Up and coming other researchers
How do you do it?
Identify leading figures from journal publications
(high citations, keynote speakers)
Send them your papers for comments, comment on
their papers (positively, or helpful)
Try to meet them at conferences (best are small
conferences)
Put your working papers on paper sites
Volunteer to organize sessions in conferences, an
excuse to contact many researchers
How to Publish in
High Impact Journals
Malaysia, November 2012
The END
13
Topics to be covered
For further information about this lecture email to: Dr. Mazdak Zamani <mazdak@utm.my>
14