Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Science Wars, ed. Andrew Ross. Durham, NC and London: Duke University
Press, pp. 30-60.
Polanyi, M. (1962) Personal Knowledge. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Before saying anything about the positioning of this book within the discur-
sive parameters of current polemics on theory versus literature it would be
as well to assess at least the central thrust of the volume in its own terms. It
is essentially a work of philosophical scholarship which, taking as its basis
various modern theories tending to decentre the author and focus attention
on the role of the interpreter in the constitution of textual meaning, seeks his-
torical antecedents for that approach in German philosophy from the 18th to
20th centuries. Bowie points out that it was in the Romantic period of the
late 18th century that enthusiasm for art and literature came to fill the spiri-
tual void following the rolling back of the tide of western metaphysics, and
he sees a strong parallel between Romantic philosophy and modern literary
theory:
Literary theory is itself a hybrid rather than a unified discipline, com-
bining resources from philosophy, linguistics, psychoanalysis, femin-
ism, social theory and other areas of the humanities, in order to
question basic assumptions about the understanding of texts and other
bearers of truth and meaning in both the human and natural sciences.
Like Romantic philosophy, literary theory can be understood as part of
a growing reaction against the separation of the
everyday ’life world’
from the systemically determined spheres of science, technology and
modern bureacracy. (16)
Bowie notes that the move away from viewing language as a purely mimetic
medium - that is, as a simple representational code reflecting a pre-existent,
universal reality - also surfaced in the 18th century, coinciding with ’the
decline of theological views of the world in which language, to put it crudely,
was regarded as God’s naming of the furniture of the universe’ (21). Since this
rather basic paradigm shift brought about a sense of ’disenchantment’
(’Entzauberung’ is the not easily translatable German term) for all too
obvious reasons (in the English tradition one sees plangent evidence of that
in a variety of writers from Coleridge to D. H. Lawrence), Bowie sees the
NJ: Princeton University Press, 1989] or Sean Burke, The Death and Return
of the Author [Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1992]). In his present
book, however, Bowie consciously eschews (overt) polemic and presents
both his philosophical and Germanistic constituencies with sound historical
analyses that are excitingly brought to bear on present-day debates. At any
rate, writing as a Germanist (rather than as a professional philosopher) I
would recommend the work for its illuminating discussions of philosophical
’background’, which can do nothing but enrich literature studies for students
who will be able to see how the various epistemes confronting creative
writers came to arise in the modern, post-1750 era.
Neil Thomas
Department of German, University of Durham, UK