Professional Documents
Culture Documents
I. NEGLIGENCE
I. A. Concept of Negligence
o Articles 2178, 1172, 1173, and 1733
o (Memorize: Articles 1172 to 1174 )
1. Definition; Elements
Article 20, CC
Article 1173 CC
Kinds of Negligence
Tests of negligence
Art. 1173
2. Standard of Conduct
Children
Experts/Professionals
Article 2187,CC
Culion vs. Philippine, GR No. 32611
US vs. Pineda, 37 Phil 456
BPI vs. CA, 216 SCRA 51
Intoxication
Insanity
B. Degrees of Negligence
Article 2231, CC
Marinduqe vs. Workmen’s, 99 Phil 48
C. Proof of Negligence
1. Burden of proof
2. Presumption
respondeat superior
common carrier
D. Defenses
1. Plaintiff’s Negligence
Article 2179 (Memorize)
2. Contributory Negligence
Article 2179 (Memorize)
Genobiagon vs. CA, 178 SCRA 422
Rakes vs. Atlantic, GR No 1719 (1907)
Philippine Bank of Commerce vs. CA, 269 SCRA 695
LBC Cargo v. CA 241 SCRA 619
Jarco Marketing v. CA GR 129792, 21 Dec 1999
Lambert v. CAstillon GR 160709, 23 Feb 2005
NCP v. Heirs of Casionan GR 165969, 27 Nov 2008
3. Fortuitous Event
Article 1174 (Memorize)
4. Assumption of Risk
6. Emergency rule
7. Due diligence
8. Prescription
Article 1146
9. Double recovery
Memorize Article 2177, CC
Farolan v. Solmac Marketing Corporation, G.R. No. 83589, March 13, 1991
BPI Express Card Corporation v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 120639, September
25, 1998
Custodio v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 116100, February 9, 1996
Amonoy v. Gutierrez, G.R. No. 140420, February 15, 2001
DOLE Philippines, Inc., v. Rodriguez, G.R. No. 174646, August 22, 2012