Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Verbs in Katian
Katialang Englandlang
Ko-séibazun ni, zátpa ztatmi hakommi In this article, the writer intends to
Katialang ni sýkotosí nú yoty. Pa hakommi describe the verb system in Katian. They
daka, edzókka, mehayka mu tendeka describe initial, imaginary, idealistic and
katasí. Pa mou misemi platkeikatasí. imperative forms. They also show
compound forms,
1. Introduction
Katian verbs are conjugated depending on several aspects: these encompass tense, confirmation,
mood, formality and interlocutor. The following diagram shows the full conjugation of the verb
zátmi (to write):
Zedaka (Indicative)
Register
Tense Norennisha (neutral-low) Bisoséiha (high-academic)
Confirmation Affirmative Negative Affirmative Negative
Infinitive/present zátmi zátzéa zátmi zátzéa
“I write / I’m “I don’t write / “I write / I’m “I don’t write /
writing” I’m not writing” writing” I’m not writing”
Past zátpam zátzépam zátpamu zátzéapamu
“I wrote” “I didn’t write” “I wrote” “I didn’t write”
Future zátfem zátzéfem zátfami zátzéafami
“I will write” “I won’t write” “I will write” “I won’t write”
Edzókka (Conditional)
Register
Tense Norennisha (neutral-low) Bisoséiha (high-academic)
Confirmation Affirmative Negative Affirmative Negative
Present zátmikum zátzéakum zátmikfimu zátzéakfimu
“I would write” “I wouldn’t write” “I would write” “I wouldn’t write”
Past zátpamkum zátzépamkum zátpamukfimu zátzéapamukfimu
“I would’ve “I wouldn’t have “I would’ve “I wouldn’t have
written” written” written” written”
Future zátfemkum zátzéfemkum zátfamikfimu zátzéafamikfimu
“I would be “I wouldn’t be “I would be “I wouldn’t be
aiming to write” aiming to write” aiming to write” aiming to write”
Mehayka (Idealized)
Register
Tense Norennisha (neutral-low) Bisoséiha (high-academic)
Confirmation Affirmative Negative Affirmative Negative
Present zátmitýni zátzéatýni zátmittíni zátzéattíni
“I should write” “I shouldn’t “I should write” “I shouldn’t write”
write”
Past zátpamtýni zátzépamtýni zátpamuttíni zátzéapamuttíni
“I should’ve “I shouldn’t have “I should’ve “I shouldn’t have
written” written” written” written”
Future zátfemtýni zátzéfemtýni zátfamittíni zátzéafamittíni
“I should be “I shouldn’t be “I should be “I shouldn’t be
aiming to write” aiming to write” aiming to write” aiming to write”
Tendeka (Imperative)
Confirmation
Register Affirmative Negative
Norenha (neutral) Zátten Zátzéten
“Write” “Don’t write”
Taiha (vulgar) Záttai Zátzétai
“Write, damn” “Don’t write, damn”
Bisoha (polite) Záttensúan Zátzéatensúan
“Write, please” “Don’t write, please”
Oto an lazóiha (male-oriented Zátku Zátzéaku*
affectionate) “Write, my dear man” “Don’t write, my dear man”
Ona an lazóiha (female- Zátla Zátzéala*
oriented affectionate) “Write, my dear woman” “Don’t write, my dear woman”
Bankoka (legislative) Zátmi Zátzéa
“Write” “Do not write”
Emaka (self-directed) Zátsó Zátzésó
“let’s write” “Let’s not write”
Sohbangaika (royal-divine) Záthou Zátzéahou
“Oh, mighty, be so kind to “Oh, mighty, be so kind not to
write” write”
*Southeastern dialects (such as Zétlamuha, Sorkyutyaha and Keitanha) will generally say “zátzéku” and
“zátzéla” instead. Nonetheless, these alternative forms are not well received in writing, even amongst
those who speak the aforementioned dialects (Rimopaski & Mazófei, 2010)
What has been provided above is a summary of the different possible conjugations in Broad
Universal Katian, or KSKT. However, further explanation is needed to grasp the Katian verbs
2. Confirmation
One of the most important features to understand in the Katian verb system is Sánayufea
(Confirmation. Lit: Indication of yes or no). In brief, this feature expresses the affirmation or
negation of an utterance; in other words, whether or not something happens.
While affirmation is the default setting for all endings, negations are always shown inserting the
suffix “-zéa” and after the root of the verb or the replacement of the ending “-mi” with the
former in present forms, as is shown below. Bear in mind that the following examples will all
be in the neutral-low register:
Notice that in the neutral-low register, the “a” at the end of the suffix “-zéa” is dropped both in past
and future tense. Nevertheless, this is never the case in the high-academic register.
3. Basic conjugation
3.1. Indicative forms
In Katian, the use of indicative forms imply veracity and certainty about the message. In
addition, this is the basis upon which both conditional and idealized forms are built. The basic
conjugation schemata are the following:
Confirmation
Affirmative Negative
Zénzí (Present) -mi -zéa
Pamuzí (past) -pam/-pamu -zépam/-zéapamu
Famizí (future) -fem/-fami -zéfem/-zéafami
In order to get an overview, here are some examples. This time, these focus on the high-
academic register:
Oto loyupamu ta sýnmi.
man jump-AFF.PAS.IND.BSH in order to die-AFF.PRE.IND
“The man jumped in order to die.”
Nángusí sýnzéafami.
Angel-PLUR die-NEG.FUT.IND.BSH
“The angels will not die”
In Katian, the use of conditional forms imply uncertainty or mere hypothesis about the message.
The basic conjugation schemata are the following:
Confirmation
Affirmative Negative
Zénzí (Present) -mikum/-mikfimu -zéakum/-zéakfimu
Pamuzí (past) -pamkum/-pamukfimu -zépamkum/-zéapamukfimu
Famizí (future) -femkum/-famikfimu -zéfemkum/-zéafamikfimu
In Katian, the use of indicative forms imply that the state of the world would improve if a
certain action were taken. I does not necessarily imply obligation. The basic conjugation
schemata are the following:
Confirmation
Affirmative Negative
Zénzí (Present) -mitýni/-mittíni -zéatýni/-zéattíni
Pamuzí (past) -patýni/-pamuttíni -zépamtýni/-zéapamuttíni
Famizí (future) -femtýni/-famittíni -zéfemtýni/-zéafamittíni
3.4.1. Neutral
People normally use this form to project “unromantic closeness/intimacy,” which,
in short, means that there is proximity in regards to social hierarchy. In this
category, one can find: similarly-aged friends and acquaintances, siblings, children,
nieces and nephews, cousins and co-workers with similar positions. This imperative
uses the following conjugation scheme:
Confirmation
Affirmative Negative
Neutral imperative -ten -zéten
Ateten spoly.
Give-IMP[neutral] salt
“Pass the salt”
3.4.2. Formal
People normally use this form to project “respectful distance,” which, opposed to
the neutral imperative, showcases respect towards people of higher hierarchical
status. It is usually directed at: visibly older friends, acquaintances, siblings and
cousins, bosses, relatives from previous generations (such as parents, grandparents,
aunts and uncles) and in-laws. This form of imperative is also generally used
towards strangers. This imperative uses the following conjugation scheme:
Confirmation
Affirmative Negative
Neutral imperative -tensúan -zéatensúan
3.4.3. Vulgar
People normally use this form to project anger, disrespect, hatred and/or contempt
for the interlocutor. The use of this imperative, according to Biosthosé’s findings,
transcends any hierarchical differences. This imperative uses the following
conjugation scheme:
Confirmation
Affirmative Negative
Neutral imperative -tai -zétai
This form of imperative is used when talking to a male romantic partner (such as a
boyfriend, husband or lover), regardless of the sex of the speaker. Its conjugation
scheme goes as follows:
Confirmation
Affirmative Negative
Neutral imperative -ku -zéku
1 The Word “sjpernik” (shark) is a common nickname for a male lover. This is due to the traditional
association of this animal to masculine traits, such as strength and vision.
This form of imperative is used in pretty much the same way as the previous,
except it is use addressing a female romantic partner (such as a girlfriend, wife or
lover), regardless of the sex of the speaker. That said, Biosthosé (2013) found a
modern trend amongst young females to use this imperative with close friends of
the same sex. Its conjugation scheme goes as follows:
Confirmation
Affirmative Negative
Neutral imperative -la -zéla
3.4.6. Self-directed
This form of imperative is used when addressing the first person. In other words,
when giving oneself or to a group of people that includes oneself. This imperative
is built as described below:
Confirmation
Affirmative Negative
Neutral imperative -só -zésó
3.4.7. Legislative
This form of imperative is used in order to dictate rules and laws. This is mostly
used in written texts, such as signs and rulebooks. Its conjugation is identical to the
present indicative tense:
Confirmation
Affirmative Negative
Neutral imperative -mi -zéa
2 The Word “nántem” (tiger) is a common nickname for a female lover. This is due to the traditional
association of this animal to feminine traits, such as care for the offspring and sexual confidence.
“Stop” sign “Do not use your cellphone” sign
3.4.8. Royal-divine
This form of imperative is used when asking something from either the Katian
royal family or from a divine entity. This imperative is built as described below:
Confirmation
Affirmative Negative
Neutral imperative -hou -zéahou
Pomansanók, mitensúan.
Orange juice IMP[formal]
“Orange juice, please.”
Osokiu, miku!
slow-ADV IMP[M.O.A]
“Slowly, my dear man!”
Simakazíman, miten!
Careful-ADJ.COMP IMP[neutral]
“Be more careful.”
Notice that one should not use endings of negative confirmation, since verbless sentences
have a different type of negation. This is done by adding the word “na” (no) at the end of
the sentence.
4. Katian copula
Most Katian language registers, except for “séiha” (academic speech), have the possibility of using
verbless copula, by avoiding the verb “mammi” (to be). There are two aspects to consider when
using these phrases: first, they are negated in the same way as verbelss imperatives (by adding “na”
at the end of the sentence). Second, the tense of the sentence can be affected by the use of time
complements.
Mea gakupa.
1s student
“I’m a student.”
Bibliography
Biosthosé, N. (2013). Katiapasí kana tendekatasí. Makarinzhobna: Naska H.
Rimopaski, K., Mazófei, L. (2010). Keulafea, Sorlafea mu Katialang (Northern love, Southern
love and the Katian language). In: Katian Journal of Sociology. Shindan: Síndanka Pasúgakutsu
Pp. 47-58.