G4-VM Workshop Final Report PDF

SBEC 4843: VALUE MANAGEMENT
VM WORKSHOP FINAL REPORT-GROUP 4
DATARAN ILMU IN THE PARK (UTM KL)
NO STUDENT NAME ID MATRIC NO POSSITON

1 WAN HIDAYATUL MUTAKIM WAN MAT ZAIN SX150037BECS04 CLIENT
2 MOHD NAZRI MOHD RATHA SX150013BECS04 ARCHITECT
3 NURUL FATINI HAIZUM BT ALIAS SX100351BECJ04 C&S ENGINEER
4 MALIKI BIN MUSTAFA SX15009BECSO4 M&E ENGINEER
5 ZAKIA TUSSA’DAH BINTI MOHD KHARUN SX150039BECS04 QS
6 MUHAMMAD AMIRUL ASHRAF BIN AZAHAR SX150016BECS04 END USER
LECTURER:
Dr. ZUHAILI BIN MOHD RAMLY
VALUE MANAGEMENT WORKSHOP REPORT for DATARAN ILMU THE PARK, UTM KL GROUP 4 2018/19
CONTENTS PAGES
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1
2. INTRODUCTION 2
2.1 Introduction to Value Management and Value Management Workshop 2
2.2 Project Background 3
3. INFORMATION PHASE 4
3.1 Stakeholder Presentation and Information 4
3.1.1 Client 4
3.1.1.1 Budget 4
3.1.1.2 Need Statement and Brief 4
3.1.2 Architecture 6
3.1.2.1 Design Concept 7
3.1.3 Civil & Structure (C&S) Engineer 19
3.1.3.1 Structural System 19
3.1.4 Mechanical & Electrical (M&E) Engineer 20
3.1.4.1 Current Situation 20
3.1.4.2 Nearest Building (Electrical source) 20
3.1.4.3 M&E Proposal 21
3.1.5 Quantity Surveyor (QS) 25
3.1.5.1 Introduction 25
3.1.5.2 Main Building Cost 25
3.1.5.3 Civil & Structural Work Cost 26
3.1.5.4 Electrical Work Cost 27
3.1.5.5 ID Works, Built-In Fitments, Loose Furnitures And Equipment Cost 28
4. FUNCTION ANALYSIS PHASE 29

4.1 Function Identification 29
4.2 Function sorting 30
4.3 Fast Diagram 30
5. CREATIVITY PHASE 32
5.1 Key Function 32
5.2 Brainstorming Process 33
5.3 Idea Generation 33
6. EVALUATION PHASE 34
6.1 Categorization of Ideas 34
6.2 Evaluation Criteria 35
6.3 Evaluation of Ideas 36
6.4 Analysis and Discussion 38
7. DEVELOPMENT PHASE 41
7.1 Value Implication of Evaluated Ideas 41
7.1.1 Purposes 41
7.1.2 Cost Implication 42
7.1.2.1 Roof Finishes 42
7.1.2.2 Floor Finishes 43
7.1.2.3 Column Materials 44
8. CONCLUSION & LIMITATION 45
8.1 Conclusion 45
8.2 Limitation 45
SBEC 4843: VALUE MANAGEMENT ii

9. REFLECTION BY PARTICIPANTS 46
9.1 Client 46
9.2 Architect 46
9.3 Civil & Structure (C&S) engineer 47
9.4 Mechanical & Electrical (M&E) engineer 48
9.5 Quantity Surveyor (QS) 48
9.6 End User (Student) 49
10. APPENDIX (PHOTO & STAKEHOLDER SLIDE) 50
10.1 Workshop Activities Photo 50
10.2 Information Slide by Participants 52
10.2.1 Client 52
10.2.2 Architect 58
10.2.3 Civil & Structure Engineer 67
10.2.4 Mechanical & Electrical Engineer 76
10.2.5 Quantity Surveyor 83
10.2.5 End User (Student) 87
SBEC 4843: VALUE MANAGEMENT iii

LIST OF TABLE PAGES
Table 1:Main building cost ................................................................................................................................... 25

Table 2:C&S work cost .......................................................................................................................................... 26
Table 3:Electrical work cost .................................................................................................................................. 27
Table 4:ID, Built-in, loose furniture and equipment cost ..................................................................................... 28
Table 5:List of function identified during workshop ............................................................................................. 29
Table 6:Ideas generate form brainstorming between team members during workshop .................................... 33
Table 7:List of idea after sorting into P1, P2 and P3 ............................................................................................. 34
Table 8:List of criteria for our project ................................................................................................................... 35
Table 9:Result for every selected criterion ........................................................................................................... 37
Table 10:Evaluation for roof materials ................................................................................................................. 38
Table 11:Evaluation for column materials ............................................................................................................ 39
Table 12:Evaluation for floor finishes materials ................................................................................................... 40
LIST OF FIGURE PAGES
Figure 1:Propose location, Dataran Ilmu UTM KL................................................................................................... 3

Figure 2:Plan view for POD arrangement ............................................................................................................... 7
Figure 3:Site current view and situation ............................................................................................................... 20
Figure 4:AirEye for indoor area ............................................................................................................................ 21
Figure 5:PIVOT 2.0 model for indoor area ............................................................................................................ 22
SBEC 4843: VALUE MANAGEMENT iv

1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The project being assigned to our design team is to Propose Dataran Ilmu The Park UTM(KL).
Dataran Ilmu is located at Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM)KL. The place is in front of
Library Perpustakaan Sultanah Zakaria (PSZ). The stakeholders involved in this project
included client, engineer, architect, mechanical engineer, quantity surveyor and end user.
The list participants are mention below:
No. Participants Possiton

1 Wan Hidayatul Mutakim Wan Mat Zain Client
2 Mohd Nazri Mohd Ratha Architect
3 Nurul Fatini Haizum Bt Alias C&S Engineer
4 Maliki Bin Mustafa M&E Engineer
5 Zakia Tussa’dah Binti Mohd Kharun Qs
6 Muhammad Amirul Ashraf Bin Azahar End User
Dataran Ilmu is an open area outside the library PSZ. Total area for this area is 14400-meter
square. The idea to create Dataran Ilmu is to provide a place for students to study, have
discussion and there also have an exhibition corner. It’s because the existing library just can
use at the limit time and the facilities not enough for student, part time student and lecture.
During the pre-workshop session, the client agreed to provide RM 1,000, 000.00 as the
capital of the create project. All the stakeholders have been come to an agreement to
create something new at Dataran Ilmu to attract more students to utilize the open space in
front of library especially after the operation hour of library. In order not to affect the
student routine, the construction work will be carrying out during the semester break and
for the students‟ sake, there will be leaving a passage for students to enter the library.
SBEC 4843: VALUE MANAGEMENT 1

2. INTRODUCTION
2.1 Introduction to Value Management and Value Management Workshop
Literally value management known as a technique used to identify the function of a product
or any available services by using two methods:
• Establish a monetary value for function

• Provide necessary function at the lowest overall cost.
Some said value management is a kind of style of management used to motivate people
involved in design and construction phase to develop their skill and promote interactions
and innovation which can help in maximizing overall performance of an organization.
There are five principles applicable for value management:
a) Multidiscipline
✓ Kind of combination of several academic disciplines to solve a problem
b) Value
✓ This principle is close enough to maximize client profit.
c) Life cycle cost

✓ Always focus on overall cost of the project not solely the initial cost of
production.
d) Function
✓ Crucial element to increase the value of monetary.
e) Structured
✓ Structured and analytic process to achieve value of money.

2.2 Project Background
a. Project Tittle : Cadangan Menaiktaraf Kawasan Dataran

Ilmu Universiti Teknologi Malaysia,
Cawangan Kuala Lumpur (UTM KL) Serta
Kerja-Kerja Yang Berkaitan Dengannya
Untuk Tetuan UTM KL
b. Location Project : Dataran Ilmu UTM KL

c. Client : Pengarah Jabatan Harta Bina,UTM KL
d. Architect Consultant : Nu-Reka Sdn.Bhd
e. Civil & Structure (C&S) Consultant : Fathini Associated Sdn.Bhd
f. Mechanical & Electrical (M&E) Consultant : MBM Engineering Sdn.Bhd
g. Quantity Surveyor (QS) Consultant : Jurukur ZTA Sdn.Bhd
h. Cost Project Estimate : RM 823,775.16

i. Project Estimate Duration : 4 Month
Figure 1:Propose location, Dataran Ilmu UTM KL

3. INFORMATION PHASE
3.1 Stakeholder Presentation and Information
3.1.1 Client
3.1.1.1 Budget
Allocation budget for upgrading Dataran Ilmu has been decided up to RM 1,000, 000.00
after considering all factors raised by the project team.
3.1.1.2 Need Statement and Brief
As an overview and the client’s intent of redeveloping an existing Dataran Ilmu. and to serve
as the initial parameters for reference by consultants to undertake the project for
Upgrading work. The new “Dataran Ilmu in The Park” shall serve primarily for the students
of UTM for gathering, group study/works and 24 hours activities.
The designer has to consider as per below requirement:
• To proposed and upgrade the M&E item.

• To proposed using steel structure as a main canopy.
• To use loose furniture for easy maintenance in future.
• To reuse the existing structure as many as possible.
The project’s proposed concept should consider the following statements and for which the
consultants are to provide further input:
• To enhance value of surrounding development by increasing the level of

comfortability for student to study and hangout.
• Represent a sense of openness and a positive community atmosphere.
• Offer facilities and spaces for the community for social interaction and recreation.
• Optimizing and upgrading the surrounding infrastructure for convenience and
safety.
Design principles for the development should include the following:

Creation of Identity
To develop a strong, active and distinctive neighborhood that caters for a broad cross
section of UTM’s residents (including fulltime student and part timer student).

• Provide visually appealing entry statements.

• Create clear image of landscape design.
• Offer attractive usable public spaces.
• Environmental Sensitivity
✓ innovative green building.
✓ Cost effective engineering solutions.
✓ Cost effective maintenance.
✓ Protect natural area and habitats

3.1.2 Architecture
Information was gathered across during Pre-Workshop and actual workshop from Client
including some survey data from the Students which we referred as the ‘End User’. Positive
inputs are the essential keys to generate design ideas for the successfulness of this project.
Key points have been captured to visualize the Client’s needs as listed below;
• Shaded Area
• Attractive design
• Seating Benches
• Street Cafe
• Power and internet supply
• Dominant Statement

3.1.2.1 Design Concept
At Nu-Reka, we have looked to push the boundaries of transportable architecture, while

creating beautiful modern solutions to the requirement for extra space.
Our Pods have been architecturally designed with careful consideration of the latest design
methodologies and trends. Our aim has been to create modern yet functional spaces that
make the most of every millimeter of the area and volume available, while maintaining a
sophisticated quality and finish.
• push the boundaries of transportable architecture

• creating beautiful modern solutions
• sophisticated quality and finish.
• Flexibility on a number of different level.
Pod Concepts have also been designed to accommodate a number of cluster combinations,
meaning if one pod is not enough you can combine two or more to meet your specific
requirements. Pod Concepts have the flexibility to change with you over time, adapting uses
as your needs change, and if you move, you can take your Pod Concept with you!
Figure 2:Plan view for POD arrangement












3.1.3 Civil & Structure (C&S) Engineer
On this project there is no heavy structural work that involve. Scope of work for this
project is involving some hacking activity on the structure. Some of builders’ work involved
for hacking process towards existing structure (beam, column, etc.) shall be hacked to make
space for cable for electrical appliances that is to be installed as shown in drawing.
The process of hacking shall be made in accordance and supervision of Architect.

Information regarding the alteration of any building structure of the library’s foyer must be
sent to the Architect initially before proceeding to the commencement of work. For the
cable that is located at the ceiling. They shall be installed alongside a conduit.
3.1.3.1 Structural System
i). RC Footing
The footing provides a stable flat supportive base that distributes the weight of the load of
the structure into the surrounding soil. The weight distribution is spread out through the
soil as the distance increases from the footing. For this reason, the texture of the soil is
crucial to the success of any rectangular or continuous footing design.
The soil immediately surrounding the footing is the most crucial area and is also generally
the most damaged area as well. When the soil is disturbed during the digging of the footing,
the texture of the soil is changed and air is introduced. This reduces the bearing capacity of
the soil. For this reason, the soil must be tightly compacted before pouring a concrete
footing.
ii). Metal Column Cladding
Metal column is an ideal choice for metal column cladding, offering a highly flexible solution
to enhance the aesthetic appearance of a building (Dataran Ilmu).
iii). Tensile Roof
A tensile structure is a construction of elements carrying only tension and no compression

or bending. The term tensile should not be confused with tensegrity, which is a structural
form with both tension and compression elements. Tensile structures are the most common
type of thin-shell structures.
Most tensile structures are supported by some form of compression or bending elements,
such as masts (as in The O2, formerly the Millennium Dome), compression rings or beams.
A tensile membrane structure is most often used as a roof, as they can economically and
attractively span large distances.

3.1.4 Mechanical & Electrical (M&E) Engineer
3.1.4.1 Current Situation
• No electrical point (power socket, DB and electrical power supply) inside project
area/boundary.
• Project to provide new electrical power socket (for external use)
• Perimeter project already complete with external lighting but less lighting lux and a
few already damage and not function very well.
• No enough lighting (existing lighting can’t support night activities)
• Thermal comfort/temperature not suitable for outdoor activities (study, student
function and etc.)-Temperature can archive to 35 degree of Celsius.
Figure 3:Site current view and situation
3.1.4.2 Nearest Building (Electrical source)
Power source can be directly connected to existing functional building

A few nearest functional building (existing building) such as:
• Hall
• Library
• Shop
• Lecturer room
• Utilities room
3.1.4.3 M&E Proposal
i. Fan (Option No.1)
Manufacture : Big ass

Model name : Air Eye
Type : Wall Mount
Location use : Indoor area Dataran Ilmu
Purpose specs & details location

• Provide comfort (thermal comfort) during hot weather
• Fan should be mount at column (specific column detail by engineer)
• 2 nos. Should be install with 24inci size of fan (by manufacture details)
Figure 4:AirEye for indoor area

ii. Fan (Option 2)
Manufacture : Big Ass

Model name : PIVOT 2.0
Type : Wall Mount
Location use : Indoor area Dataran Ilmu
Purpose specs & details location:

• Provide comfort (thermal comfort) during hot weather
• Fan should be mount at column and beam (specific column detail by
engineer),minimum 3m from ground level
• 2 Nos. should be install with 6ft diameter (1800mm) by manufacture product details
Figure 5:PIVOT 2.0 model for indoor area

iii. Ligthing system (Indoor)-Option 1
Manufacture : SJ Lite
Model name : Direct & Indirect T5 (Model No. SOI128)
Type : Mounted fluorescent lamp
Location use : Indoor area dataran ilmu

• Provide lighting comfortable at night and dark days (raining or cloudy)
• Lamp should be mount below beam
• 15 Nos. should be install (1x28W T5 fluorescent lamp per Nos)
• Limited luminaries L≤1000cd/m2 of reference angle 65 degree
• Provided comfortable light effect with suspension system
• Easy alignment and height adjustment
iv. Ligthing system (Indoor)-Option 2

Manufacture : SJ Lite
Model name : High bay -Urabus 200
Type : Suspended high bay luminaries
Location use : Indoor area dataran ilmu

• Lamp should be mount below beam
• 10 Nos. should be install (70W per Nos.)
v. Ligthing system (Outdoor)

Manufacture : PHILIPS
Model name : PureForm LED Bollard PBL
Type : Bollard LED Lamp (street lighting)
Location use : Perimeter area at Dataran Ilmu
Purpose specs & details location

• Lamp should be embedded into concrete walkway (plate embedded)
• 20 Nos should be installed around Dataran ilmu (60’’ height)
• Philips Gardco PureForm bollard LED integrates a sleek, low profile design,
extraordinary
• light output, and energy savings into an innovative pedestrian scale luminaire.
• PureForm bollard features a high performance optical system designed to achieve
wide spacings and full cutoff performance.

vi. Power socket
Manufacture : MK Electric
Model name : 13A MK Metalclad BS Socket
Type : Plug socket
Location use : Indoor & outdoor area dataran ilmu

• Provide electric sources for user
• Plug should be install 1500mm & 300mm form finishing level at surface of wall
• 20 Nos should be installed inside Dataran ilmu (13A Two gang socket)
• 10 Nos should be installed outside Dataran ilmu (13A Two gang socket)

3.1.5 Quantity Surveyor (QS)
3.1.5.1 Introduction
Budget allocation by the client: RM 1000,000.00

First Estimation: RM 823,775.16
i). Procurement system:

• Traditional procurement method.
• Client will appoint architect to prepare a design and working drawings.
• Architect will prepare design according to client needs.
ii). Contractual requirement

• Type of tender: nominated tendering
3.1.5.2 Main Building Cost
PAGE AMOUNT
BILL DESCRIPTION (RM)
NO
Building Works 710,151.00
1 CIVIL & STRUCTURE WORKS 493,100.00
2 ELECTRICAL & MENCHANICAL WORKS 24,240.00
3 ID WWORKS, BUILT-IN FITMENTS, LOOSE FURNITURES 192,811.00

AND EQUIPMENTS
4 LABOUR COST @ 5% 35,507.55
5 CONTINGENCIES @ 6% 42,609.06
6 PRELIMINARIES @ 5% 35,507.55
To Collection 823,775.16
Table 1:Main building cost

3.1.5.3 Civil & Structural Work Cost
PAGE Q RATE AMOUNT

ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT (RM) (RM)
NO TY
EXTERNAL
A
WORKS
230,000.00
1 Tensile copy with Nos 1 5,600.00

B metal Arch 5,600.00
structure
2 Tensile Roof: Nos 3 96,000.00

32,000.00
a) 1st layer: 6m
b) 2nd Layer: 5m
3 Aluminum Nos 5 116,000.00

structure with 23,200.00
Timber stain
laminate fixed
with engineered
timber flooring
4 Steel structure Nos 7 45,500.00

canopy with 6,500.00
mushroom
column (height:
5.5m)
SUMMARY
PAGE A
PAGE B
TOTAL CARRIED TO SUMMARY OF TENDER 493,100.00
Table 2:C&S work cost

3.1.5.4 Electrical Work Cost
PAGE RATE AMOUNT

ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY (RM) (RM)
NO
1 To supply and labour and Nos 16 130.00 2,080.00

tools Power socket 13A Two
gang
2 To supply and install Nos 10 175.00 1,750.00

Industrial wall fan mounted
size 14"
3 To supply and Industrial wall Nos 5 220.00 1,100.00

fan mounted size 20"
4 To supply Lighting Lamp Nos 6 375.00 2,250.00

(Indoor) with installation
5 To Supply Light Post with Nos 8 450.00 3,600.00

installation
6 To supply and install Mini Nos 20 168.00 3,360.00

Sport light marked point
(Indoor and outdoor)
7 Testing and Commissioning Lot 1 3,500.00 3,500.00
7 Services and maintenance Lot 3 2,200.00 6,600.00

existing electrical tools (3
month)
Table 3:Electrical work cost

3.1.5.5 ID Works, Built-In Fitments, Loose Furnitures And Equipment Cost
PAGE RATE AMOUNT

ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY (RM) (RM)
NO
1 Supply and intsall Entrance Statement Unit 1 430.00 430.00

with big clock
2 Supply and install UTM logo Unit 1 370.00 370.00
3 To supply and deliver Sculpture Nos 1 943.00 943.00

seating
4 To Supply and deliver Café pods come Set 2 82,000.00 164,000.00

with accessories and installation and
item as below:
-Powder coated steel structure
-Tensile sheet roofing
-Aluminium strips island backdrop
with aluminum shelving
-Aluminium low cabinet with
perforated metal doors
5 To supply and deliver Sofa Nos 10 690.00 6,900.00
6 To supply and deliver Ikea Circle Nos 12 889.00 10,668.00

dining table (comes with chairs)
7 To supply and deliver Curved Bench Nos 10 950.00 9,500.00

outdoor
Table 4:ID, Built-in, loose furniture and equipment cost

4. FUNCTION ANALYSIS PHASE
4.1 Function Identification
Function identification is the activities to identify every function involved in this project. This
activity also the first step in function analysis phase. Function will be identified base on what
client need and project requirement. This function will be identified by every team member
to collect and gather more information for this project using two (2) verbs technique. The
table shown function identified during workshop.
NO FUNCTION
1 Gather student
2 Create collaboration space
3 Create social interaction
4 Attract people
5 Enhance Communication
6 Install LCD Tv / Advertising
7 Provide security
8 Develop skill
9 Serve comfort
10 Offer alternative study area
11 Offer facilities
12 Install CCTV
13 Provide mist fan
14 Service print
15 Cater internet WIFI
16 Provide vendor machine
17 Install power supply
18 Provide security guard
19 Enhance landscape
20 Provide green space
Table 5:List of function identified during workshop

4.2 Function sorting
Function sorting is activities sort all identified function to two (2) main function which is
Basic Needs and Basic Wants. All function must sort correctly and all team member must
decide based on priority for this project to ensure archive project objective and goal. All
function sorting as shown below:
NO BASIC NEEDS NO BASIC WANTS

1 Create social interaction 1 Enhance communication
2 Gather student 2 Install LCD advertising
3 Create collaboration space 3 Provide security
4 Attract people 4 Install CCTV
5 Develop skill 5 Provided security guard
6 Serve comfort 6 Provide green space
7 Offer alternative study area 7 Enhance landscape
8 Offer facilities
9 Provide mist fan
10 Services print
11 Cater internet WIFI
12 Provide vendor machine
13 Install power supply
4.3 Fast Diagram
After agreeing on the problem statement, the single most important output of the multi-
disciplined team engaged in developing a FAST model is consensus. Since the team has been
charged with the responsibility of resolving the assigned problem, it is their interpretation of
the FAST model that reflects the problem statement that's important.
The team members then discussed and reconfigured the FAST model until consensus is
reached and all participating team members are satisfied that their concerns are expressed
in the model. Once consensus has been achieved, the FAST model is complete and the team
can move on to the next creative phase.

Develop Skills Provide Mist Fan
Gather Students
Create Social Serve Comfort

Service Print
Interaction
NEEDS
Create Collaboration Offer Alternative Study

Cater Internet (WIFI)
Space Area
Provide Vendor
Machine
Attract People Offer Facilities
DATARAN ILMU
Install Power Supply
Enhance
Install LCD Advertising
Communication
WANTS
Install CCTV
Provide Security
Provided Security
Guard

Provide Green Space Enhance Landscape
5. CREATIVITY PHASE
5.1 Key Function
The revitalization of Dataran Ilmu project has portray the requirement and needs as
demanded by the Stakeholders. These
highlighted elements are including but not
limited to;
• Create Social Interaction

• Enhance Communication
• Upgrade Facilities
• Elevate Comfortability
During our workshop session, our Facilitator has lead us to elaborate more on the needs and
requirement of our project. Our VM team members were told to elaborate these points
deeper prior to proceeding to brainstorming session. Therefore, we have chosen two key
function accordingly;
i. Enhance Communication
Enhance Communication is an exchange between two or more individuals, through

interacting with one another, people design rules, institutions and systems within which
they seek to live in. By enhancing communication among the students will form a kind of
movement or activity at the Dataran Ilmu, where our aim is to transform the ‘dull’ area to a
more vibrant platform. Concept design by the Architect is essential in order to optimize
functions with the incorporation of supporting elements for this project.
ii. Elevate Comfortability
The level of comfortability at Dataran Ilmu is impossible to achieve due to lack of either
natural shades or building shades. As we are well aware that Dataran Ilmu is currently an
open area with full exposure to direct sunlight. Therefore, our aim is to elevate
comfortability, to ensure the amount of collaboration at Dataran Ilmu is at an all-time high,
and to get the most out of it, students need spaces that are designed specifically for working
together or collaboration. Generating new ideas and innovating is much easier when in a
‘human-first environment’.

5.2 Brainstorming Process
Brainstorming process is the most interesting part of Creative Phase. All members are open
for any ideas or opinion without the fear of being judged by others. This session is a type of
group creativity technique where attempts are made to find a conclusion to a specific
problem by collecting a list of ideas spontaneously contributed by its members. Team
members can think more freely and they are capable of proposing many new spontaneous
ideas as possible.
During our Brainstorming session, we have generated 22 ideas for both selected key
functions.
5.3 Idea Generation
Table below shows the generated ideas from the Brainstorming session;
Enhance Communication Elevate Comfortability

Provide seating area Install WIFI
Create shaded spaces Install tensile roof canopy
Create unique benches Install engineered timber seating
Provide garden furniture Provide power socket
Arrange day/night usage Install light post
Use portable equipment Install LED advertising board
Install sculpture Provide hand phone charging station
Introduce new soft landscape design Install Mist Fan
Upgrade existing hard landscape Install Heli-Fan
Provide extra canopy Provide Vending Machines
Provide portable cafeteria Provide printing service
Table 6:Ideas generate form brainstorming between team members during workshop
Upon completing the above list, we were instructed by the Facilitator to tabulate the ideas
into 3 categories to recognize its viability and feasibility as per table below;
P1 Realistically Possible
P2 Remotely Possible
P3 Fantasy

6. EVALUATION PHASE
6.1 Categorization of Ideas
In this part of the evaluation phase, the VMTC shall categorize all their ideas presented
during three stages and rate them based on;
• P1; Idea is realistically possible (Top Priority)

• P2; Idea is remotely possible (2nd Priority)
• P3; Idea is a fantasy (Low Priority)
No Description/Rank No Description / Rank

1 Enhance Communication P1 13 Elevate Comfortability P1
2 Provide seating area P1 14 Install WIFI P2
3 Create shaded spaces P1 15 Install tensile roof canopy P1
4 Create unique benches P2 16 Install engineered timber seating P2
5 Provide garden furniture P2 17 Provide power socket P2
6 Arrange day/night usage P2 18 Install light post P2
7 Use portable equipment P2 19 Install LED advertising board P3
8 Install sculpture P3 20 Provide phone charging station P3
9 Design new soft landscape P3 21 Install Mist Fan P1
10 Upgrade existing hard landscape P2 22 Install Heli-Fan P2
11 Provide extra canopy P2 23 Provide Vending Machines P2
12 Provide portable cafeteria P2 24 Provide printing service P2
P1 6
Total P2 14
P3 4
Table 7:List of idea after sorting into P1, P2 and P3
Most importance of this is so that the team is aware on which ideas is prioritize based on
the evaluation criteria. In this stage, all ideas shall not be questioned and any criticism
should be for constructive meaning only.
It is very important that the team is aware of the criteria of each project so that a more
reasonable and logical ideas can be considered for the project. This will ensure that
everyone is on the same page and mind which will greatly increase the percentage of
achieving an idea that can greatly help in improving the value of the project.

6.2 Evaluation Criteria
The Objective of the evaluation phase is to bring the best ideas and to screen the ideas
generating during from the creative phase forward, then evaluate and refine them into
potential solutions so that only best ideal will be selected for development.
During the evaluation phase it important to take the ideas from the creative phase and
critically evaluate each idea to see if it provides a right decision or solution for the project
under study. The criteria that we considered for our project as our guideline or preference is
following below;
No Criteria Description
Since a Dataran Ilmu is located and facing the main road, we need to
1 Design/
emphasize the facade so that, it can be as part of Land mark of UTM
Aesthetic
building.
Based on our Quantity Surveyor’s estimate, we would have not
exceed the clients contract budget of RM1,000,000. So, cost is not
2 Cost prioritize in this project. However, we will try to spend out within the
budget without the VO later
As we are well aware that Dataran Ilmu is currently an open area with full
exposure to direct sunlight. Therefore, our aim is to elevate
3 Comfort comfortability, to ensure the amount of collaboration at Dataran Ilmu is
Level at an all-time high, and to get the most out of it, students
need spaces that are designed specifically for working together or
collaboration
The physical environment of school buildings and school grounds is a key

factor in the overall health and safety of students, staff, and visitors.
4 Safety School buildings and grounds must be designed and maintained to be
free of health and safety hazards, and to promote learning. Studies have
shown that student achievement can be affected either positively or
negatively by the school environment.
Although the buildability of building designs has not been commonly

taken as an important parameter in design quality assessment, previous
5 Buildability studies have linked buildability to time, cost, quality and safety
performance in many ways. At the project level, the findings give
designers a better understanding of factors affecting the buildability of
their outputs, thus enabling design solutions leading to more efficient
and safe construction.
Table 8:List of criteria for our project

Evaluation criteria have a gigantic influence in the evaluation phase. With criteria shortlisted
by the group, we can chop down every one of the thoughts exhibited and we can see which
is progressively imperative in expanding the estimation of the undertaking. Besides, the
criteria will likewise help us in assessing the thoughts which is the following stage
subsequent to sorting the thoughts exhibited by every person.
6.3 Evaluation of Ideas
For the evaluation of ideas, the technique used by this workshop is Complex Democratic
whereby each member is encouraged to discuss the ideas presented and to discuss and agree
on the overall rating or score, one by one.
A-Design/Aesthetic
B-Cost
C-Comfort Level
D-Safety
E-Buildability
CRITERIA
In this part of the evaluation phase, all the evaluation criteria will be listed down in one table
based on the most prioritize to the less prioritize. Which in our criteria is;
• Design/Aesthetic
• Cost
• Comfort level
• Safety and Buildability
The reason for this is so that it will help us easier during assessment further and more
detailed evaluation which shall be explained later on. Before proceeding, ensure that all the
team members are agree on these criteria after proper discussion with each member.

B C D E
A B 4 A 4 D 3 A 3
B C 4 D 3 B 3
C C 4 C 4
D D 1
Criteria Ranting
4 - Major Preference
3 - Medium Preference
2 - Minor Preference
1 - Equal Preference
The each of the above criteria was compared with others, and depending on their relative
importance, four categories were formed, 4 (major preference), 3 (medium preference), 2
(minor preference) and 1 (equal preference). This is will be our criteria for evaluation in
future.
Afterwards, each criterion shall be compared with another criteria and only one shall be
decided while considering on how important it is and how it can contribute to the value of
one project.
For example, A (Comfort level) is compared with B (Safety). We have decided to place A
(comfort level) over time because to ensure the comfort of the staff and students in the
future, we have to ensure all the changes is beneficial and will have a positive impact on
attracting people to come. Therefore, we have placed A (Comfort level) as Major
Preference.
Goals/Desired, Criteria Raw Score Assignd Weight (%)

A Comfort level 10 32.26
B Safety 3 9.68
C Design/Aesthetic 12 38.71
D Cost 5 16.13
E Buildability 1 3.23
Total 31 100
Table 9:Result for every selected criterion

6.4 Analysis and Discussion
The building elements that impact the for overall project are identified after discussion with
group members. The evaluation matrix process has been done to identify the best basic
function to use with other alternatives for selected item:
i). Roof materials

ii). Column materials
iii). Floor finish materials
EVALUTION MATRIX
Design/Aesthetic
Comfort level
Buildability
List the best ideas to
Safety
see which has been
Cost
trade-off of
optimization potential
ASSIGNED VALUE
IDEAS WT
32.26 9.68 38.71 16.13 3.23 TOTAL
5 EXCELENT
4 VERY GOOD
Tensile Roof 3 GOOD
4 3 5 5 3 1
2 FAIR
1 POOR
SUBTOTAL 129.03 29.03 193.55 80.65 9.68 441.94
5 EXCELENT
4 VERY GOOD
Roof Aluminium composite panel 3 GOOD
3 3 4 1 4
3
2 FAIR
1 POOR
SUBTOTAL 96.77 29.03 154.84 16.13 12.90 309.68
5 EXCELENT
4 VERY GOOD
Roof metal deck 3 GOOD
1 2 1 5 5 5
2 FAIR
1 POOR
SUBTOTAL 32.26 19.35 38.71 80.65 16.13 187.10
5 EXCELENT
4 VERY GOOD
Glass roof 3 GOOD
3 1 4 5 3
2
2 FAIR
1 POOR
SUBTOTAL 96.77 9.68 154.84 80.65 9.68 351.61
5 EXCELENT
4 VERY GOOD
Concrete roof 3 GOOD
2 2 3 3 5
4
2 FAIR
1 POOR
SUBTOTAL 64.52 19.35 116.13 48.39 16.13 264.52
Table 10:Evaluation for roof materials

EVALUTION MATRIX
Design/Aesthetic
Comfort level
Buildability
Safety
see which has been
Cost
trade-off of
ASSIGNED VALUE
IDEAS WT
32.26 9.68 38.71 16.13 3.23 TOTAL
5 EXCELENT
4 VERY GOOD
Stainless Steel Columns 3 GOOD
4 2 5 5 5
1
2 FAIR
1 POOR
SUBTOTAL 129.03 19.35 193.55 80.65 16.13 438.71
5 EXCELENT
4 VERY GOOD
Mild steel Column 3 GOOD
4 3 4 3 4 2
2 FAIR
1 POOR
SUBTOTAL 129.03 29.03 154.84 48.39 12.90 374.19
5 EXCELENT
4 VERY GOOD
Chengal Timber column 3 GOOD
4 2 3 2 3 3
2 FAIR
1 POOR
SUBTOTAL 129.03 19.35 116.13 32.26 9.68 306.45
5 EXCELENT
4 VERY GOOD
Concrete Column 3 GOOD
3 2 2 4 4
4
2 FAIR
1 POOR
SUBTOTAL 96.77 19.35 77.42 64.52 12.90 270.97
5 EXCELENT
4 VERY GOOD
Clay Brick Column 3 GOOD
3 4 1 1 4 5
2 FAIR
1 POOR
SUBTOTAL 96.77 38.71 38.71 16.13 12.90 203.23
Table 11:Evaluation for column materials

EVALUTION MATRIX
Design/Aesthetic
Comfort level
Buildability
Safety
see which has been
Cost
trade-off of
ASSIGNED VALUE
IDEAS WT
32.26 9.68 38.71 16.13 3.23 TOTAL
5 EXCELENT
4 VERY GOOD
Engineering timber floor 3 GOOD
5 2 5 3 1
1
2 FAIR
1 POOR
SUBTOTAL 161.29 19.35 193.55 48.39 3.23 425.81
5 EXCELENT
4 VERY GOOD
Homogeneous tiles 3 GOOD
4 4 4 2 4
3
2 FAIR
1 POOR
SUBTOTAL 129.03 38.71 154.84 32.26 12.90 367.74
5 EXCELENT
4 VERY GOOD
Ceramic tiles 3 GOOD
3 2 1 3 2
4
2 FAIR
1 POOR
SUBTOTAL 96.77 19.35 38.71 48.39 6.45 209.68
5 EXCELENT
4 VERY GOOD
Marbel floor 3 GOOD
5 2 4 4 3
2
2 FAIR
1 POOR
SUBTOTAL 161.2903226 19.35483871 154.84 64.52 9.68 409.68
5 EXCELENT
4 VERY GOOD
Bare concrete finish 3 GOOD
1 3 2 1 1
5
2 FAIR
1 POOR
SUBTOTAL 32.26 29.03 77.42 16.13 3.23 158.06
Table 12:Evaluation for floor finishes materials
Based on evaluation above. the team has listed down potential replacement for the material
to be considered. Once listed, all the ideas shall be rated from 1-5 from the poorest to the
most excellent choice. Then after the rating after calculating (including weightage), the
material shall be rated from position from number 1 (being the best option) to number 5
(least favorite option).

7. DEVELOPMENT PHASE
7.1 Value Implication of Evaluated Ideas
7.1.1 Purposes
To further analysis the viability of ideas to be developed into workable solutions as best or
preferred options.
The accepted ideas selected for further development are investigated and considered in
detail for their technical feasibility and economic viability. Outline designs will be worked
out and costs should be realized. This phase can be a time-consuming exercise and it is
increasingly current practice for this to be done outside the VM workshop. These proposed
alternative designs must be supported by backup calculations, sketches and descriptions of
cost and other implications. This is where the experts in the different disciplines come into
play. The time allocated to this phase should not be shortened as this is a critical phase for
the successful outcome of the VM workshop.
Comprehensive proposals are formulated in this phase which provides and extension to the
evaluation process. Descriptions of the proposals should be detailed and supported by
backup data so that they may be understood correctly by all the decision makers and
because these proposals are often reviewed by different types of audiences.
Activities to be conducted as follow:
• Develop and further evaluate the shortlisted ideas into workable options and
determine the best solutions based on their advantages and disadvantages, cost
implication, innovativeness, risks and constraints.
• Present and obtain consensus on the best solution as VE study recommendations
through a plenary session.
• Summarize all recommended ideas and findings including reviewing study module(s),
space / cost / quality (or others)
• Develop action plan
• Review achievement of VE study againts the predetermined objectives and identify
any lesson learned.
The Development process is done after Evaluation stage. The results of the assessment and
the ideas selected and agreed upon by the participating parties are as follows:
i). Roof finishes materials

ii). Floor finishes materials
iii). Colum materials

7.1.2 Cost Implication
7.1.2.1 Roof Finishes
Margin Cost Save/

No Type Cost Original Cost (+/-) Overhead
Original Idea (Design)
1 Tensile roof RM96,000.00 RM96,000.00 RM00.00 -
Propose/Alternative Idea
2 Aluminium panel RM20,475.00 RM75,525.00 Save
3 Metal deck RM16,200.00 RM79,800.00 Save
4 Glass roof RM30,300.00 RM96,000.00 RM65,700.00 Save
5 Concrete panel roof RM25,850.00 RM70,150.00 Save
Result: maintaining the design
i). Advantages
• Good in ventilation can give the indoor comfort
• Lightweight
✓ The major advantage of tensile membrane structures is its lightweightness.
Prestressed shapes of the membrane, low mass and wide span provide
opportunity to express lightness and stability
• Natural lighting and light control good for energy saving
• Flexible in form and producing less heavy visual impact than other materials.
• Design is very versatile and changeable
ii). Disavantages
• Uniqueness of each project
✓ The form of this membranes needs to be calculated for each project by
engineers, and specially in more complicated projects it can increase the time
and cost.
• Cost issue
✓ Material is not expensive and construction can be easy, but as this projects
are unique, they need of very expertized professionals, both engineers and
architects, so the cost is increased a lot.
• Lack of design
✓ This material is quite new compared with commonly used materials as steel
or concrete. Because of that, there is a lack of design guidance.

7.1.2.2 Floor Finishes
Margin Cost Save/

1 Timber RM116,000.00 RM116,000.00 RM00.00 -
2 Tiles - Homo RM22,000.00 RM94,000.00 Save
3 Tile-Ceramic RM26,000.00 RM90,000.00 Save
4 Marble RM122,800.00 RM116,000.00 -RM6,800.00 Overhead
5 Concrete base RM15,00.00 RM101,000.00 Save
i). Advantages
• Aesthetics
✓ For an elegant and aesthetic appeal, It ages beautifully and develops a silver-
grey patina, and it also has a beautifully natural look, is warm to the touch and
is of great value. It also does not go out of style.
• Durability
✓ Wooden flooring is the most long-lasting and sturdiest of all flooring materials.
They are also water-resistant.
• Easy to restore saving
✓ It can easily be restored by sanding or grinding it or recoating it.
• Styles, shapes and colors
✓ range of hardwood flooring in different colors, stains, styles and species.
ii). Disavantages
• Needs constant maintenance
✓ Every three to four years, you will need to polish the floor, if used very often.
• Expansion and contraction.
✓ Depending on the temperature and humidity, hardwood is known to expand
or contract.

7.1.2.3 Column Materials
Margin Cost Save/

1 Stainless steel RM45,500.00 RM45,500.00 RM00.00 -
2 Mild steel RM30,200.00 RM14,800.00 Save
3 Chengal timber RM25,000.00 RM20,500.00 Save
4 Concrete RM36,200.00 RM45,500.00 RM9,300.00 Save
5 Clay brick RM12,200.00 RM33,300.00 Save
i). Advantages
• Better performance in fire.
• Attractive appearance.
• Highly durability
✓ It is highly resistant to impact and structural damage, and the rigidity of the
steel is preserved with a broad temperature
• Quality of construction.
✓ Steel structures can be built with high-quality workmanship and narrow
tolerances.
• Repetitive use
✓ Can be reused after a structure is disassembled.
ii). Disavantages
• Negligible maintenance cost.
• susceptible to corrosion
• Fireproofing.
✓ The strength of steel is reduced substantially when heated at temperatures
commonly observed in building fires. Steel frames in buildings must have
adequate fireproofing

8. CONCLUSION & LIMITATION
8.1 Conclusion
Value management is a very useful technique in our case that maximizes opportunities and
eliminates waste. This training organizes facts and information by identifying objectives,
organizing an analysis of existing information and analysis; and confirm the decision taken.
Therefore, it helps UTM make their decisions more confident and guarantees the
organizational value system. We, the project team are very pleased to be part of this
workshop, where participants are well supportive and communicative on the information
related to the project. Good communication always the key for VM workshop to be success
at obtaining the best solution.
8.2 Limitation
However, there are still some other limitations that need to be endured such as
time, sound pollution and limited space or area.
i). Time
Project must be strictly followed the project timeframe issued by the client and delays are
not recommend. This project requires careful planning to avoid learning disabilities to
student. Also, any extension of time may incur more cost and impact some
addition of temporary work.
ii). Sound Pollution
The sound that is caused by the renovation works have to be controlled as noise is
prohibited around the library area.
iii). Limited space
The proposed site is located in the middle of the existing building. Therefore, it causes
difficulties for machinery enter the site.

9. REFLECTION BY PARTICIPANTS
9.1 Client
As a client for this project and also my current scope of work as a Developer (Client) in UEM
Sunrise Berhad, i need to give clear direction during VM workshop and all team members in
the design team and QS must achieved that what we target and set before. Based on VM
workshop, as a client we try to minimize the complaint by end user after hand over the
project so that we can focus or keep improve the product that we deliver. The best team
design is critical to us to get done the project and we must put on trust in to them to make
sure all the functions required fully complemented.
All info by stakeholder are crucial to ensure every single pertinent requirement and needs
fully review. With the several ideas generated during the workshop we need to keep quick
with the problem facing with time, since time limitation is the primary constraint during the
workshop. Even some of VE workshop the time is so limited every team member gave their
cooperation, and fully supported by the dedicated value management team coordinators
and facilitator to conduct the workshop well.
Yes, At the end of the workshop we can came with the best solution to ensure the value of
the project can be maximized and can maintain the design intend and the requirement.
9.2 Architect
In value management, architectural approaches are an effective tool to help us achieve an

optimistic value. It helps us understand the real implications of our requirements (brief
design). Sharing value management decisions. It gives us the power to make critical
decisions when it comes to our building design and budget. This is an official way of
referring to the aspect of architectural services we provide to our customers.
Value management is not just about cost savings, it's about identifying the value of our
project and our needs. It identifies potential areas of potential savings, takes into
consideration our design choices, and helps us choose the best solution. It also helps
identify where there is a conflict between cost and quality.
Value management is the most effective at the beginning of our project, during the brief
formation and the concept design stage. Advantage of value management has rapidly
diminished before the concept stage. By finishing our working drawings their benefits have
been lost.

It makes sense to use value management at the earliest stage of the project, as it has great
benefits, including:
• Evaluate design options against each dispute

• handling urgent design decisions at the beginning of the design process
• Review, amend (if necessary) and confirm our brief.
• Check and validate our budget
• Deal with our building life cycle costs
• Handle operational considerations (energy, operating costs and more)
9.3 Civil & Structure (C&S) engineer
As a civil & structure engineer, I enjoy attending Value Management Workshop especially
during the creativity phase as I can hear the other stakeholder’s ideas or opinions to
improve and enhance my proposed design to the next level. It actually helps me in broaden
my mind by looking at the design from their views hence the objective of the project as well
as all of their requirements are being fully satisfied and in accordance to their request.
The evaluation phase is one of the most crucial part during the workshop. It helps the team
to evaluate and see more accurately to which idea is more beneficial based on the ideas
presented and also based on the Evaluation Criteria. Although some ideas are good but a
team must realize if it does not meet the criteria set, the value of the project will be
affected.
With the evaluation phase, the team has the opportunity to work together with a diverse
member consisting of many individuals with their own expertise of the construction field in
evaluating and discussing together. This will help one team to meld together as one and
achieve the goal of obtaining the value of the project.
Even the time is so limited every team member gave their cooperation, and supported by
the dedicated value management team coordinators to conduct the workshop well. At the
end of the workshop we came with the best solution to ensure the value of the project can
be maximized.

9.4 Mechanical & Electrical (M&E) engineer
Value Management (VM) is very helpful where each party can generate ideas to ensure that
every project to be implemented achieves the main objectives of implementation. In
addition, the evaluation phase is crucial for all parties to determine any best ideas or
proposals in project implementation for either quality, cost or function.
In the phase analysis function also plays a big role because from here each member of the
group can identify each of the functions that will be involved for this project. This requires
the support and cooperation of all parties to ensure that the requirements and
requirements of the project are fully identifiable.
VM is an important thing especially from the construction industry because the assessment
of something like cost implications, time or quality of the project can be identified first
before project run. This gives opportunity to each group member to learn and understand
the concept of VM. For example,
• Discussions on project functions during the workshop, identifying the main functions
of the project,
• Identifying the key points in a project,
• The best method for evaluating function based on the concepts adopted in VM.
• The effects that will occur on the project in the event of any changes during the
workshop
9.5 Quantity Surveyor (QS)
The VM study is one of the best troubleshooting methods and should be applied in any
related field. The aim of the VM study is to improve the solution with focusing on the
related issues. During the VM workshop those related issues with performance, reliability,
contingency or quality will be assigned to the task team to improve and get the new
outcomes. Being in quantity surveyor its help Preparation of initial estimates and cost
planning based on client’s architectural needs.
VM also help to ensure that the construction project is completed within its projected
budget and its help QS managing the costs to make sure that the initial budget isn’t
exceeded. While there are constraints in terms of time allocation, this can be overcome by
the collaboration of new ideas and inputs among all participants who assist in finding
solutions in the elements of the project that have been discussed. Therefore, Value
Management organizes a system of thinking to see things in a broader perspective. It relates
directly to design, procurement, and installation in any construction project.

9.6 End User (Student)
As the student representative from the Student Union of University Teknologi Malaysia, I
am very happy and glad because I was given the chance to participate the value
management workshop which is also my first workshop. From this workshop I get to know
many professionals such as architect and quantity surveyor. Moreover, I get the chance to
see through the opinion and consideration of different stakeholder based on their
professionalism. During the information phase I also noticed there are some constraints to
be consider in this project
Besides, in this workshop I was lucky enough to present all the information and suggestion
that I have collected from the feedback of students. The presentation that prepared by the
student union included basic need and requirement of students. By this way, client and
professional can have a glance regarding what is demand of the student. I am happy with
the decision in the workshop because most of the demands of students have been fulfilled.

10. APPENDIX (PHOTO & STAKEHOLDER SLIDE)
10.1 Workshop Activities Photo


10.2 Information Slide by Participants
10.2.1 Client
CLIENT INFORMATION SLIDE






10.2.2 Architect
ARCHITECT INFORMATION SLIDE









10.2.3 Civil & Structure Engineer
CIVIL & STRUCTURE INFORMATION SLIDE









10.2.4 Mechanical & Electrical Engineer
M&E INFORMATION SLIDE







10.2.5 Quantity Surveyor
QUANTITY SURVEYOR INFORMATION SLIDE




10.2.5 End User (Student)
END USER (STUDENT) INFORMATION SLIDE





G4-VM Workshop Final Report PDF

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

G4-VM Workshop Final Report PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

SBEC 4843: VALUE MANAGEMENT

VM WORKSHOP FINAL REPORT-GROUP 4

DATARAN ILMU IN THE PARK (UTM KL)

NO STUDENT NAME ID MATRIC NO POSSITON

4. FUNCTION ANALYSIS PHASE 29

SBEC 4843: VALUE MANAGEMENT ii

SBEC 4843: VALUE MANAGEMENT iii

LIST OF TABLE PAGES

Table 1:Main building cost ................................................................................................................................... 25

LIST OF FIGURE PAGES

Figure 1:Propose location, Dataran Ilmu UTM KL................................................................................................... 3

SBEC 4843: VALUE MANAGEMENT iv

No. Participants Possiton

SBEC 4843: VALUE MANAGEMENT 1

2.1 Introduction to Value Management and Value Management Workshop

• Establish a monetary value for function

c) Life cycle cost

SBEC 4843: VALUE MANAGEMENT 2

2.2 Project Background

a. Project Tittle : Cadangan Menaiktaraf Kawasan Dataran

b. Location Project : Dataran Ilmu UTM KL

h. Cost Project Estimate : RM 823,775.16

Figure 1:Propose location, Dataran Ilmu UTM KL

SBEC 4843: VALUE MANAGEMENT 3

3.1 Stakeholder Presentation and Information

3.1.1.2 Need Statement and Brief

• To proposed and upgrade the M&E item.

• To enhance value of surrounding development by increasing the level of

Design principles for the development should include the following:

SBEC 4843: VALUE MANAGEMENT 4

• Provide visually appealing entry statements.

SBEC 4843: VALUE MANAGEMENT 5

SBEC 4843: VALUE MANAGEMENT 6

3.1.2.1 Design Concept

At Nu-Reka, we have looked to push the boundaries of transportable architecture, while

• push the boundaries of transportable architecture

Figure 2:Plan view for POD arrangement

SBEC 4843: VALUE MANAGEMENT 7

SBEC 4843: VALUE MANAGEMENT 8

SBEC 4843: VALUE MANAGEMENT 9

SBEC 4843: VALUE MANAGEMENT 10

SBEC 4843: VALUE MANAGEMENT 11

SBEC 4843: VALUE MANAGEMENT 12

SBEC 4843: VALUE MANAGEMENT 13

SBEC 4843: VALUE MANAGEMENT 14

SBEC 4843: VALUE MANAGEMENT 15

SBEC 4843: VALUE MANAGEMENT 16

SBEC 4843: VALUE MANAGEMENT 17

SBEC 4843: VALUE MANAGEMENT 18

3.1.3 Civil & Structure (C&S) Engineer

The process of hacking shall be made in accordance and supervision of Architect.

3.1.3.1 Structural System

ii). Metal Column Cladding

iii). Tensile Roof

A tensile structure is a construction of elements carrying only tension and no compression

SBEC 4843: VALUE MANAGEMENT 19

3.1.4 Mechanical & Electrical (M&E) Engineer

3.1.4.1 Current Situation

Figure 3:Site current view and situation

3.1.4.2 Nearest Building (Electrical source)

Power source can be directly connected to existing functional building

3.1.4.3 M&E Proposal

i. Fan (Option No.1)