Professional Documents
Culture Documents
This chapter discusses the ideas and findings from various literatures and studies,
the researchers have assembled from journals and other resources to support the purpose
of this study.
Laguna de Bay
the major lake in the Philippines and amongst the biggest in Southeast Asia. The Laguna
Lake Development Authority is the only legal office in the act of lake basin management
in the Philippines, which was articulated in 1996 through Republic Act 4850. It is a
development in the Laguna de Bay region, this agency primarily highlights such
protection of forests and all related activities under the authority of the Laguna de Bay
Inside almost every surface of the earth, water composes it. Highlands and
ridgelines that descend into lower elevations and stream valleys define a watershed and is
(2015). After rain falls, waters are collected by watershed. Drop by drop, water is
directed into soils, ground waters, creeks, and streams, making its way to larger rivers
and eventually the sea. Water being a universal solvent affects all that comes into contact
with it. The very significant essence of the watershed is; people’s actions on land deeply
affect the quality of the water for all communities living downstream.
Protection for Sustainable Water Supply in Sibalom Natural Park, Sibalom, Antique”, it
was cited that David (1985) defined watershed as an eco-system that is build land-based
which converts, collects the mass amount of rain and drains water to a single exit point
environmental and social aspects. It serves as a home for plants and animals, making it as
a source of food for the people. It is an avenue for such activities inclined to recreational
Lake Development Authority was launched under the Community Development Division
considers both water quality and volume in the range of an interrelated biological
urbanization all the way to the lake basin. Twenty-four (24) sub-basins embraces the
Laguna de Bay. These are used as the basic units for preparation and execution of the
M u l t i - s e c t o r a l P a r t i c i p a t i o n … | 15
Catchment Management, whereby the complete catchment is considered and not just the
reach to be rehabilitated. Effective rehabilitation projects follow nine main stages. These
are: developing goals and objectives; river condition study; prioritization and program
As cited by Fryirs and Brierley (2009), river rehabilitation must test leading
mindsets that permeate contemporary management methods in many parts of the world.
Primarily, field evidence must be utilized to inform and control the restoration practice,
as opposed to rely upon cookbook uses of course book learning. Esteeming the decent
variety of river forms in a specific catchment offers the baseline whereupon to work.
Secondly, recovery arrangement ought to be encased around how a river functions and
modifies (its scope of conduct), instead of what it would appear that, ensuring that
training changes past discernments that test to "settle" a river set up. Thirdly, restoration
projects ought to be legitimately confined in connection to the spatial and the consecutive
point of view of any given movement. Due respect ought to be given to treatment
reactions, featuring how alterations in any given reach will have off-site outcomes.
constraining variables that may settle the viability of river restoration. Activities ought to
that transient advantages are not accomplished at the cost of longer-term losses, keeping
Junker and Buchecker (2008) explained that river rehabilitation programs differ
achievable and what is anticipated in any given catchment. Societal visions are molded
Public Participation
organizations select to take an active role in creating decisions that affect them. While the
participation. However, Reed (2008) did not look at these contexts as conflicting ideas,
identified four typologies of participation classified according to their basis and contexts.
These are typologies based on: (a) different degrees of participation on a continuum; (b)
empowerment helps build a good relationship between government and the public.
IAP2 (2007) has developed a public participation spectrum which aims to help
stakeholders in defining the role of the public in terms of their participation. There are
five categories of participation stated in the spectrum: (1) Inform, wherein the goal of this
category is to provide the public with all the information that may influence their
information to the public, get their opinions and concerns, and have them incorporated in
draft proposals; (3) Involve, this means that the policy-makers are working closely with
the public to ensure that all their inputs are obtained and taken care of; (4) Collaborate, in
this category, the policy-makers and the public are working hands-in-hand all throughout
the decision-making process as well as in the formulation of alternative solutions; and (5)
Empower, this category means that it is the public who has the final say in the decision-
making process.
Mefalopulos and Tufte (2009) also identified four levels of participation: (1)
Passive Participation, this is considered to be the least participatory among the four. In
this level, the stakeholders are merely provided with information and only a minimal
amount of feedback is obtained from them; (2) Participation by consultation, in this level
of participation, stakeholders are given the right to give their opinions. However, the final
this point, stakeholders have an active role in the decision-making process. It includes
M u l t i - s e c t o r a l P a r t i c i p a t i o n … | 18
working among all partners, (4) Empowerment participation, in this level of participation,
the sectors are willing and able to be a part of the procedure and take an interest in joint
analysis, which prompts community oriented basic leadership about what ought to be
accomplished and how. While the role of outsiders is that of equal partners in the
resourcefulness, local stakeholders are equal partners with a significant say in decisions
which are institutional perspective and social movement perspective. According to them,
these two approaches both look at participation as the involvement of the public in
development processes that will lead to change. However, institutional perspective looks
determined by people or groups who are not members of the concerned community. On
the other hand, social movement perspective can serve as the goal of the empowering
process itself.
Amata (2012) aimed to determine the extent community participation in the whale
shark ecotourism project in Donsol, Sorsogon. Data were gathered through self-
between the socio-demographic profiles of the respondents and their level of awareness,
nature of participation, and level of participation. Results of the study showed that
respondents’ level of participation fall under the third level which is Consultation.
M u l t i - s e c t o r a l P a r t i c i p a t i o n … | 19
elevated for the reason that it is expected to enhance resource management and allow
improve river basin management are outlined: (1) giving space for consideration and
concurrence building for preferably quality decision; (2) organizing and advancing
human and social capital for better adequate decisions and their execution; and (3)
increasing the legality of decisions to promote their execution. There are several
diversities connected with each of the mechanisms that increase challenges ascertaining
concurrence building and conflict to increase the quality of the decision without
jeopardizing the possibility for execution; being conscious of and executing plans to
stakeholders perceive the advantages from participation that surpass costs; and defining
criteria for a lawful process, and a legal decision that satisfy all participants. Strategies
articulate how participation is being done, to address the challenges and endeavor to
In the study of Heyd and Neef (2008) entitled Public Participation in Water
management study in the Mae Sa watershed, northern Thailand. This article studies to
M u l t i - s e c t o r a l P a r t i c i p a t i o n … | 20
what degree the constitutional right of participation has been put into actions.
Furthermore, they conducted a stakeholder analysis in the watershed, with the emphasis
on local people's strategies and interests in water management and changed participatory
policies through government agencies at the local level. While government officials
determined the significance of stakeholder involvement and collaboration with the local
people, there is a sharp comparison between the rhetoric and its application to the reality.
The study analyzes and reveals that government officials, specifically in the
conservation-oriented organizations, are not willing to delegate power to lower levels and
the involvement of the public in water management appears to be at inform level or, at
best, consultative in nature. In order to catch up with the gradually serious water
In the study of Chun, Samah and Solaiman (2012) on Public Participation in the
Conservation of a Tropical Urban River, it was said that even though there are various
programs, projects and activities carried by government agencies concerned with rivers,
still most river rehabilitation projects were not maintained according to the required goals
and objectives of the program. They also added that it is because of the lack of public
Development Authority it showed that the respondents are generally aware of the River
the respondents are unaware that River Rehabilitation Program includes Formulation of
together representatives from various sectors (LGUs, NGOs, POs, youth and civic
organizations, etc) to formulate realistic strategies to protect and rehabilitate the river.
Whereas, for Raven and Boon (2012) it was discovered that public engagement
has been shown to generate not only positive attitudes but also long-term interest and
pride in caring for the local environment; on the contrary, disregarding the public has
been shown to lead to negative feelings of exclusion and discontent, which might threaten
In the study of Medallon, Muya and Tenorio (2016), the respondents who are part
of the study are the local residents that are mostly female, elementary graduates but
employed. They lightly used Internet, television, radio, in terms of their media exposure.
Such exposure to media results in their awareness to the Adopt-a-River project. Though,
group discussion is the main source of information of the said project. The Adopt-a-River
project positively perceived by the local residents. Also, they agreed that Adopt-a-River
project’s message is comprehensible and suitable and easy words were used to promote
and execute the project. Furthermore, the project’s impact to the residents is useful and
positive and they learn everything about the project. While the perception of the project is
positive, results showed that the level of participation that most local residents faced is
passive participation, wherein they were only informed of the regulation and programs,
although some claimed that they are not hindered on their participation on the project.
Conservation in Nepal it was inferred that keeping up ecological quality and food
M u l t i - s e c t o r a l P a r t i c i p a t i o n … | 22
security is the real test of the twenty first century, which relate specifically to wetland.
Participatory coordinated wetland administration has turned into the acknowledged way
to deal with managing wetlands. Community role in the protection actions is relatively
growing if they go as one for practical use of wetland assets and looks for the contrasting
options to lessen and pursues for the replacements to lessen the weight on wetland.
Through various activities and strategies in light of nearby support, we can be idealistic
that once the general population made mindful, instructed and prepared, they will have
the capacity to comprehend the significance, dangers and conceivable answers for the
protection and administration of wetlands. Thus, it is basic to instruct the public about the
estimation of wetlands (especially for the endangered Ramsar places) and its wise use. in
wetland regions must be roused and assembled to cooperate, use their indigenous
information with the goal that they can enhance the wetland environment and inspire
their living styles. In addition, it is vital to secure group investment principally the
wetland clients and partners in maintainable administration of wetland assets. For the
effective wetland protection and administration, the group ought to have the capacity to
give and get data about the wetlands, valuation and existing biodiversity. The association
advances mindfulness, self-assurance, and confidence at all levels of the group structure.
as activities that involve the public and/or stakeholders, are frequently encountered in
river basin management. They have increased more unmistakable quality over late
are constrained in their capacity to oversee water assets acceptably. Supporters for
involvement in water source management talk over that only by that exclusive by moving
far from a top– down administration demonstrate in which choices are set up by a small
group of chosen experts who are parted from the citizens who live and work in the basin,
toward a participatory model that involves the intricacy of understandings and advantages
in the basin, would more be able to ethically sound and realistic management strategies
with, a wide range of interests and clashing targets regularly exist together inside a lake
basin, from requests by various clients on water quality and amount to surge hazard and
natural well-being. These distinctions should be tended to with a specific end goal to
achieve a choice and realize activities. Second, participatory methodologies may help
achieve a choice that is seen to be reasonable and true, i.e., residents are contented with
the legitimization for the choice. This might be especially imperative for freely claimed
state, oversaw assets, for example, water. Third, lake basin administration is data serious
in light of the fact that it requires information of the entire socio‐ecological framework,
which is divided across over a wide range of people, gatherings, and organizations
methodologies, this data can be prepared and incorporated into administration techniques.
M u l t i - s e c t o r a l P a r t i c i p a t i o n … | 24
The Republic Act 9275 or the Philippine Clean Water Act of 2004 states that the
State should organize programs, strategies, and procedures to prevent the spread of water
pollution in the country and to promote proper environmental management. This act also
communication and information dissemination. Republic Act 9275 was signed by former
President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo in March 2004 and took effect on May 2004 under
The Republic 9003 or Ecological Solid Waste Management Act of 2000 is an act
providing an ecological solid waste management program. This act required the State to
national policies that will ensure proper solid waste management; formulate strategies
The two Republic Acts both require the State to encourage public participation for
the improvement of the environment. Republic Act 9275 states that the State shall
encourage cooperation and self-regulation among Filipino citizens for the improvement
of water resources. Meanwhile, Republic Act 9003 requires the State to encourage the
waste management.
Act No. 4850 as a quasi-government agency with supervisory and exclusive capacities
Through Presidential Decree 813 in 1975, and Executive Order 927 in 1983, its powers
M u l t i - s e c t o r a l P a r t i c i p a t i o n … | 25
and purposes were additionally fortified to incorporate ecological assurance and locale
over the lake basins’ surface water. In 1993, through Executive Order 149, the
managerial supervision over LLDA was transferred from the Office of the President to
Program Planning
Sanghera (2008) described program planning as the stage where program goals
and objectives are formulated and refined by the program management team and
develops the program management plan which consists of architectural plan and different
courses of action. The program management plan focuses on producing quality outputs
on this stage including subsidiary plans comprising program scope, schedule and quality
management plan. The processes under this stage falls under the group called process
planning group.
According to Barmuta and Turak (2011), in planning the river rehabilitation it has
its foundation in socio-economic limitations and processes that includes the protection of
the ecosystem. By aiming these two aspects, we guarantee that the river restoration will
not only enhance the signs but also address the factors that are accountable for the
damages done in the river. Primarily, river rehabilitation planning must distinguish the
sources of the hindrances being targeted and integrate the available information on the
environmental processes included in the degradation. For example, this can be done by
estimating the outcome of each rehabilitation action on the purposes followed (e.g. river
must lead to the identification of the most effective set of river restoration activities for
M u l t i - s e c t o r a l P a r t i c i p a t i o n … | 26
attaining the river rehabilitation goals and objectives. These must contain not only the
expenses of the river rehabilitation but also social features, such as the possible future
result of the rehabilitation activities in local economies, and the residents’ willingness to
participate in the rehabilitation. If properly addressed, all these problems will help convey
more accurate and effective river rehabilitation plans and support their execution.
commenced, the science of river rehabilitation program is widely seen as still in a pre-
paradigmatic state with a frail conceptual basis. Where principles are given, the focus is
mainly on a wider set of management principles, such as ensuring that objectives are
efforts are vital with such principles that sub-set of ecological and geomorphological
principles that will guide the scientific aspects of work should be nested within them.
Without these, rehabilitation efforts stand the risk of being random experiments that will
Asian Development Bank (2013) said that as part of the overall basin vision
statement many modern basin plan includes environmental aspirations. As with visions
more broadly in basin planning, environmental visions tend to set out and overall
philosophy or approach, and may identify issues of concern. Rather than specific these
vision statements can be aspirational and not provide a clear set of objectives that can be
made these vision statements can deliver a preliminary indication of political purpose
around which stakeholders can agree. Environmental vision statements play a significant
part in the process of approving a basin plan, signifying that maintenance and protection
M u l t i - s e c t o r a l P a r t i c i p a t i o n … | 27
plan, while they may not provide a clear direction to the basin plan.
economic progress has led to augmented water stress in recent decades. New challenges
are posed in the maintenance of environmental flows for basin planning; core water
environmental flows which requires action to be taken at a basin scale. This contrasts
with longer standing issues around water quality, which typically require remedial
measures in both industrial and agricultural activities outside the core concerns of water
resources planners, and can be addressed at a tributary of local level. Water resources
strategies, policies and plans in most countries in the world now have high-level
there has been limited progress. One of the key challenges in successful environmental
Program Implementation
the implementation of the program management plan and the program team performs the
works indicated in the planning stage. All the activities are coordinated in order to
accomplish the objectives and program requirements. This produces the main output
and defect repairs are also done on this stage. These recommendations arises from
monitoring and controlling the program. Suggested changes from the stakeholders are
also taken which must undergo an approval process earlier the implementation.
developments. The primary activity can be month to month clean up drives and
streamlining of the waterway course and the disposal of wastes and hindrances that keep
the regular run of water. The following stage will advance the appropriation of the
system approach (land, water and species) in all improvement undertakings and activities
along the Zarqa River Basin. This ought to be done in parallel to making every vital steps
that can protect the current quantity and the flow amount of permanent water stream in
Zarqa River Basin and intending to present extra water amounts from non-ordinary
sources (completely treated wastewater, water gathering, dim water, and so forth.) in the
dry territories of the river basin and usage of common filtration and developed wetlands
change the appearance and in addition the social, natural and monetary capacity of a
public environment basically. Because of these various impedances, the arranging and
usage of waterway rebuilding will incite eager issues. Uhlendahl (2009) states that other
than clashes identified by values, partner relations and coordination, the fundamental
explanations behind restricting interests in river basin arranging are the structure of the
waterway bed, the zone, water amount and emanation into the streams. These issues can
be separated into a few sub issues, e.g. surge security, relaxation use, approach and
economy. Other than these biological, political, specialized and temperate talks,
waterways and their floodplains additionally assume an exceedingly passionate part set
up a connection.
Lindemann (2011) contends that in this specific circumstance, the river can
represent to (1) a "physical place"; (2) a "social and cultural locus" and (3) an "image for
the aggregate condition". Other than the specialized development, this implies the
arranging and usage of stream reclamation ventures need to satisfy desires in numerous
interconnection of stream basin forms causes interlinkages with other project frameworks
and in this manner adds another vital dimension to the effectively complex field. In this
way, river rehabilitation must be viewed as "issue in-setting" and must be evaluated from
inter- and transdisciplinary viewpoint that is grasping the public participation of all
affected stakeholders.
M u l t i - s e c t o r a l P a r t i c i p a t i o n … | 30
Brown (2008) states that, in this stage the program manager does both monitoring
and execute the program through its life cycle including the executing stage. It includes
defending the program against scope creep or unapproved changes to program scope,
monitoring of the progress and performance of the program in order to identify variance
from the plan, and recommending preventive and corrective measures to have it inclined
with the planned expectations. Requests for changes in the program scope coming from
the stakeholders are also included in the stage. Changes must go through an approval
evaluating the present condition of the environment, measuring the effects of ecological
demonstrated an expanded part for 'Enormous Society' in monitoring. There are surveys
of accessible writing concerning the utilization of citizen science for monitoring, exhibit
cases of successful volunteer checking work and feature imperative issues encompassing
the utilization of volunteers. There are arguments that with a specific end goal to
guarantee that ecological observing keeps on being viable it is essential to gain from
cases where volunteers are right now utilized, recognizing requirements and
distinguishing potential methodologies which will amplify both their engagement and
and volunteers may accordingly help the UK in creating vigorous facilitated monitoring
Boon and Raven (2012) revealed that both in size and number river restoration
ventures are expanding, however accessible proof that measures their environmental and
social advantages are practically nothing. Due essentially to deficient resources and poor
required for assessment which is the primary purpose for this. Long-term post-venture
have been, river restoration monitoring requirements to cover ecological and social
aspects, both in short and longer term for sufficient assessment. Monitoring advancement
of the restoration work is critical, especially if the plan or area of structures should be
changed in light of the fact that they are not creating the required or expected outcomes.
The monitoring program incorporates water amount, water quality, organic pointers and
morphological structure.
which methodologies are required, regardless of whether they are being executed, and on
the off chance that they are having the desired impact for conquering the difficulties. All
program are basic to beat the complexities of doing support and understanding the desires
of consultation and agreement restoration, creating human and social capital, and
delivering genuine choices that are the establishments for high‐quality choices that can be
actualized effectively. Much work has been led to assess investment forms in respect to
whether diverse targets are met, for example, regardless of whether a deliberative domain
M u l t i - s e c t o r a l P a r t i c i p a t i o n … | 32
is made, whether the procedure meets the members' desires, or whether members
acknowledge the choices came to. The vast assortment of work has recognized a few
imperative qualities of good procedures for investment projects and tasks. Of specific
formation of a space of trade where all members have the chance to be heard, member
access to data and gatherings, plainly characterized errands and guidelines for
whether interest is prompting high‐quality choices and what impacts they have on river
Diverse individuals have altogether different goals from a support program. Analysts
prompting a lessening in conflict between interest groups, and agriculturalists may search
for financial advantages, for example, an expansion in trim yields. Members may think
the program is a win on the off chance that they are happy with how it has been run, or on
the off chance that they see unmistakable results, (for example, an assention that backings
about new issues). Assessment of these elusive, mediator results has been recommended
as a way to evaluate what support is accomplishing that overcomes the challenges of both
Research Paradigm
Feedback Mechanism
The first frame illustrates the input, which refer to the types of respondents as to
barangay officials, non-governmental organization members, and residents. And the level
of participation in the river rehabilitation program with the stages of program planning,
The second frame is the process which discusses the data gathering procedure as
to how pertinent data will be accomplished from the construction and validation of the
The third frame shows the output which includes the level of participation of
different sectors as to each stage from program planning, program implementation and
program monitoring and evaluation. Also, the researchers determined the problems
encountered by the residents that hindered their participation in the program. And also,
The feedback serves as the turning point as to how the data will influence the
Hypothesis