POLITICAL DYNASTY

PRO
We, the affirmative party, firmly believe that political dynasty should be allowed In the
Philippines for another reason that the opposing party would predicate their argument that
political dynasty breeds abuse of power and authority. This premise is a mere allegation
considering that it is a utilization of power instead of abuse. But we cannot deny circumstances
that a constituent abide rules out of fear to their leader. Nicolo Machiavelli, an Italian political
philosopher, stressed that a just society stems from the fear of the people towards their ruler
which breeds obedience. It is a form of exhausting the means to attain the end of a harmony
and just society.
Political dynasty is not a legal problem in the Philippines provided that its power is utilized not
for their personal interest but for the benefit of their subordinate. One of the advantages is that
sons or members of the bloodline running in government position have enough background on
politics and well-versed in governance. They are used-to in leading people. It has many
advantages especially if the family has a good track in their services and maintains integrity in
their office and utilizing power and authority for the benefit of the society.
Another social philosopher, Michele Foucault, emphasized power as a structural expression of a
complex strategic situation in a given social setting which requires constraint and enablement.”
This concept is imperative that power, in a perspective of a ruling class, should be perpetuated
to attain the end of justice” We, the affirmative party, accepts the fact that utilization power
does not necessarily follows abuse. Power is expressed as a strategy to adopt in a dynamic
society that requires the balance of constraint and enforcement.

3rd speaker
We, the affirmative party, firmly believe that politixal dynasty shoud be allowed in the
Philippines because of its socio political aspect in the country. Political dynasty’s continuing
existence worldwide becomes acceptable to the majority provided of the proper utilization of
power as mentioned by the previous affirmative speakers. This party argues not in the view of
the political party itself but in the view of the voters who has the capability of electing officers
that can lead them to a just society. That alone could be the advantage in this topic because
there could be no abuse of power if there will no people electing self-serving rulers. With the
trust and confidence of institutions at an all-time low in public opinion, voting for someone who
knows the job well may be an advantage for everyone. Voters won’t focus on the dynastic
aspect of their candidacies, but rather on the direction they want for the country and whom
they trust to get the job done. Just like any other election.
There are a lot of assumptions against political dynasty that does not support the present
SENATE BILL ______. Basically, the key issue here is not the structure and membership in a
political dynasty but the quality of public service that can the family renders to the public. Such
policy is not needed because voters should exercise there right of suffrage independently. We
should not limit the choices of the voters because they are the one who select their leaders.
Finally, it would be a fallacy under non sequitur “it does not follow” stressing that political
dynasties entails a corrupt and abusive system of government since there are dynasties
properly exercising their authority in a certain place for promotion of just society.