Approaching Each Situation – Attack Their Defects

The goal of this approach is to find the Defects in your opponent's' papers and actions. There is almost always a defect,
when they are using their fraudulent color of law on you. The court is Void of Jurisdiction when this happens and can
dismiss the case if YOU move the court correctly, it’s up to you. You can make a Claim against the Bonds of officials who
have harmed you. No authority (acting outside authority) = VOID case and you should win. But you will likely lose if you
don’t stay on this method and approach. No sovereign or patriot arguments or abandoning citizenship, etc. BUT it’s up
to you to find out and point these issues out, not the judge.

# Type of Defect Description

1 Flaws in the Complaint Applicable to Civil and Criminal Cases
1.1 Is there an Affidavit? Complaint MUST include an affidavit signed by someone who alleges “damage”,
violation of their rights, a debt, etc. something done by you to that man or woman,
and not just a statute violation which is intended for government employees only.
No Affidavit = Defect. Affidavit MUST state Who, What, When, Where. Mere
statement of violation of a code is defective. Was a defective Affidavit,
misinformation, or false testimony made before the Grand jury or a judge = Defect.
1.2 Assignments? If a debt is alleged, is the Complainant/Plaintiff the Original Party? (e.g., the original
bank/institution that 'loaned' you money). If NOT, then demand to see, and then
inspect, each assignment of the 'debt' in the chain of assignments. See if the
foreclosing trustee is even the proper party on the chain of title. If any assignment
is missing = Defect. Examine the dates of each assignment, and when recorded. If
not recorded, or not dated = Defect (they are not the proper party to bring a claim).
1.3 Do they have the Original If they present a mere copy of note only = Defect. If certified copy of recorded note
Note? in 2-2/3 size = Defect.

Court Lacks Jurisdiction This is actually a defect with the Complainant/Plaintiff - whether a person,
2
OVER the Subject Matter corporation, bank, debt collector, sheriff, cop, lawyer, etc.
2.1 Complainant has Ask "Who is suing me?" "Who is the Real Party in Interest? Do a FOIA request to
defective Qualifications the BAR, bank, county clerk, judge, officer, etc. So we demand the "Qualifications".
If an attorney, see if attorney has a real license, not just a bar membership so called
license, then go after their bond, or lack of oath on record. If not = Defect.
2.2 Complainant has no If a Corporation, verify if corporation is registered in the State to do business. If not
Standing to Sue = Defect (No Standing to Sue). Check other qualifications (see 12 USC 72, 73) for the
entity. If a bank, do they have a main office and/or branch in the state? If not =
Defect.

Court Lacks In Personam Court must have in personam jurisdiction (to the person) over you. Trickery often
3
Jurisdiction used to get you to acknowledge the NAME on the action.
You do NOT Never say you 'understand' anything. Ask questions in response to judge's,
“understand” prosecutor's questions.
You are only there due to Say "I can't participate in this matter at this time, because I have to know who
Threat, Duress, Coercion- issued this summons using Threat, Duress, and Coercion."
TDC TDC voids any presumed contracts and therefore lacking jurisdiction.

4 Court Lacks Subject Can this particular court hear this type of case, on this topic?
Matter Jurisdiction If not = Defect.

5 Procedural Errors Laws govern/dictate how long certain actions have to be performed. Look for
dates/times stamped on papers for timeliness of actions. Action beyond the time
 allowed = Defect

Warrants MUST have wet ink signature (not rubber stamped), plus an attached
Affidavit and an attached Complaint by a real Damaged Party! A living man vs you a
6 Flaws in the Warrant
living man/woman. If they are entity (the State of) – corporate entities (govt) can
only make complaints against corporate entities.
6.1 Warrant Defects Missing wet ink signature of proper official (judge, governor) = Defect
No warrant, defective, or 'warrant' is prepared after the arrest = Defect
6.2 Affidavit Defects Missing Affidavit = Defect
6.2. Not Sworn or Affidavit not sworn under penalty of perjury = Defect (not a real affidavit; just a
1 Notarized/Witnessed “writing”)
6.2. Signature Affidavit missing a real wet ink signature = Defect
2
6.2. Defective Affidavit fails to state Who, What, When and Where = Defect. Some affidavits only
3 Content/Statements claim that Defendant generally presumed to have violated some "law" or code. This
is defective. Codes only apply to agencies and government employees, and
“Persons” (not people).
All those involved (e.g., Jailer, Sheriff Deputy, Cop, Bailiff, Judge, Prosecutor, etc.)
Flaws in Personnel each and every MUST be Qualified to hold their office. FOIA them for their
7
Involved Qualifications (Bond, Oath of Office, other things required by law about that office).
Must have congressional authorization over a man/woman…they NEVER have that.
7.1 Oath of Office on Record No Oath = Defect. Office is vacant = No standing to take actions taken.
7.2 Bond in Place on Records No Bond = Defect. Office is vacant = No standing to take actions taken.
7.3 Other Qualifications to Missing qualifications required by law = Defect. Office is vacant therefore no
hold Office standing to take actions taken. Attorneys have no “licenses” just BAR Union
memberships, which is not authorized by congress. ALL attorneys are in fraud and
their cases they bring are void. Imagine that effect in Federal or State of cases or
lawsuits.

Court or officers/actors taking actions without proper warrant, proper standing,

Denial of Due Process
properly holding office and steamrolling over you regardless of properly
8 Rights/ Constitutional
establishing jurisdiction in all areas where jurisdiction has been contested (Object!
common law
To actions, for failure to prove on the record that court has jurisdiction).
<fill in examples of <examples: forcibly taking fingerprints, photos, DNA materials. Others?.....>
denials and damages
here>
This just an example, and is not all inclusive. Your own research is required.
 THE GENERAL PROCESS USING THIS INFORMATION:

KEY is to point out their DEFECTS on the records, point them all out. Keep pushing for dismissal.
Hold them accountable to the rules that BIND THEM.

1. Start discovery early - FOIAs on attorney's, clerk, cops, agents, CEO etc. Anyone public servant
involved.
2. Do an Abatement of the matter before court – sending it back to the court, and declaring your status
as a Non- Fiction entity. Include your Affidavit of Status as well if you have one. This works
sometimes, but you still may need to be ready for a more complete battle. Always expect them to move
forward.
3. Writ of Mandamus to enforce FOIA's.
4. Publish Public Notice of results – public summary in local paper.
5. Criminal Complaint – very powerful method. This is for sham legal process, jurisdiction, defects, on
any collection, mortgage, tax, traffic, issue. Then they will negotiate without court, or you will have
leverage if you do go to court.
6. Make your claim as a new suit – you must go on offense right away. But first provide an adequate
administrative processes, and establish a reason and record to sue, if you have time. You must exhaust
administrative remedies as a key prior to a suit.

A key to use before entering a suit is to learn procedures using: http://youarelaw.org/jd - This is a
REQUIRED study and foundation. Study before beginning the lawsuit, it costs less than 1 hour of
attorney time.

Segment from Self Help Lawsuit course (absolutely needed) http://youarelaw.org/jd

Another good research resource is http://richardcornforth.com and http://wevgov.com

Absolute immunity means you can't be sued ...with some exceptions. There are always exceptions. Certain
officers and government employees enjoy "absolute immunity", a rock-solid affirmative defense to lawsuits
brought against them, arising from actions taken within the scope of their authority.

If the Sheriff's deputy stops you on a busy street where you were driving recklessly at high speeds and delays
you from making an appointment at your hairdresser, you can sue, but you will not win!

If the same deputy yanks open the door of your car with a malicious grin, clamps an iron grip on your left ankle,
drags you forcefully across a parking lot with your head banging against the pavement, clamps handcuffs on
your wrists so tightly your fingers turn blue from lack of blood flow, then stomps on your stomach before
shoving you angrily into the back seat of his squad car, banging your head so hard against the door frame you
can no longer remember the names of your own children, you may have a lawsuit that will defeat his immunity
... if you can prove he acted outside the scope of his lawful authority.

Agents who step out of their authority are really just individuals who seldom have "absolute immunity".

You can't get vaccinated for it at your doctor's office. Officers and government employees have it by default ...
with exceptions. So long as acts of an officer or government employee (e.g., judge, prosecutor, Sheriff, senator,
mayor, or county commissioner) act lawfully within the scope of their delegated authority, this affirmative
defense protects them absolutely from lawsuits brought by disgruntled people disappointed with the "official
acts" of those officers or employees.

The hole lies in whether and to what extent an officer or employee was just "doing his job" or whether he was
acting "on his own", perhaps out of malice or gross negligence. The hole is clouded over with a grey fog of
uncertainty in most cases. The immunity only disappears when it's crystal clear that the events giving rise to the
lawsuit were beyond the scope of delegated authority. The officer or government employee may then be sued as
an individual, stripped of the cloak and badge of his office - just like anyone else.

If a judge, for example, enters an unpleasant order against you, there are remedies our law provides. Appeals or
motions can be filed in an attempt to set aside the order. If the judge acts within the law (even if you disagree
with the judge and the law), the judge is absolutely immune from a lawsuit challenging his ruling.

On the other hand, if a judge intentionally violates the law (and you can prove it), the judge has stepped outside
the protection of his authority. He no longer has immunity. You can sue him and win ... if you can prove he
acted outside the scope of his authority. This is a heavy burden. In most cases you must prove the judge acted
invidiously, i.e., with unlawful intent to harm you. This is akin to criminal intent, not mere negligence or
stupidity. Otherwise, if judges were exposed to lawsuits every time they made a ruling that disgruntled one of
the parties, no one would agree to sit as judge and be exposed to the public's attacks!

Elements

1. Defendant is a government agent or employee.

2. Defendant is insulated from suit by a valid immunity.
3. Defendant acted within the scope of his authority relevant to all allegations of the complaint.

COMMENTS - There are many subtle defects in the chart above. Many a times Due Process violation is
ALWAYS a reason to attack, and they do it regularly. Study the law as your remedy not patriot myths or
redemption methods which really have been known to work. This is by no mean all inclusive, they may be other
issues you can bring in. It’s up to you to bring these into the case and make you claim.

NOT LEGAL ADVICE - BUT MAY BE USEFUL TIPS TO YOUR COUNSEL