Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Department of Educatio
National Capital Regio
SCHOOLS DIVISION OFFI
Manila
EMPLOYEE:
POSITION::
DEPARTMENT/SCHOOL:
RATING PERIOD : April 2016 to March 2017
7%
7%
1. Strengthened participation in
seminars ,workshops, conferences
Professional and/or trainings within the school
Growth and year (school, district, division, regional,
Development national and/or international) as
15% evidenced by:
5%
a. Resource speakership/paper
presentation
b. Committee chairmanship
c. Facilitation
d. TWG membership
e. being a Trainer
5%
5% c. Training matrix
d. Assessment Tool
e. Programs/Activities aligned to 5%
SBM/SIP/AIP
f. Other tasks in exigency of
service
within the rating period
ADJECTIVAL RATINGS
RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500-5.000 Outstanding
3.500-4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500-3.499 Satisfactory
1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory
Below 1.499 Poor
NAME OF RATER:
POSITION:
DATE OF REVIEW: April ___, 2017
T June to August 5
T 5
E 5
Prepared and submitted one
comprehensive development
Q 5 5.000
plan for teachers to the school head
before the start of the school year.
T 5
5.000
E 5
indicators:
a. Functional
5.000
b. Sufficiency Q 5
c. Availability
d. Well-maintained
e. updated T 5
within the rating period
Q 5 5.000
T 5
T 5
E 5
Submitted SIP/AIP with no errors/
revision within the given time. 5.000
Q 5
T 5
5.000
b. Action Research E 5
c. Training matrix
d. Assessment Tool 5.000
e. Programs/Activities aligned to
SBM/SIP/AIP
f. Other tasks in exigency of
service
Q 5
were attained with an outstanding
evaluation within the rating period.
FINAL RATING 5.000
ADJECTIVAL RATING OUTSTANDING
Score
1.250
0.500
0.250
0.750
0.250
0.400
0.350
0.350
0.250
0.250
0.250
0.250
0.250
0.250
5.000
OUTSTANDING
EMPLOYEE:
POSITION::
DEPARTMENT/SCHOOL:
RATING PERIOD : April 2016 to March 2017
8%
3%
1. Ensured implementation of at
Leading least one leading innovation in all
Innovations aspects of school governance and 3%
5% leadership adapted/adopted by
the Division within the school year.
ADJECTIVAL RATINGS
RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500-5.000 Outstanding
3.500-4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500-3.499 Satisfactory
1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory
Below 1.499 Poor
NAME OF RATER:
POSITION:
DATE OF REVIEW: April ___, 2017
T 5
Increased enrolment by 5%
5
or more (5%)
E 5.000
Zero dropout rate (5%)
5
100% of the DepEd programs were
E 5
effectively implemented
* child protection policy
* zone of peace
* project SMILE
* drug awareness and anti-smoking Q 5 5.000
* inclusive education
* health and nutrition awareness
* feeding program
* Gender awareness Development
T 5
with zero complaint and prompt
action within the day
100% of the existing facilities such as:
a. Ancillary Services
* Canteen/Feeding Room
* Library E 5
* Clinic
* Guidance
* Property
b. Water and Sanitation
c. Building Structure
d. Disaster Preparedness
e. Safety and Security Q 5 5.000
f. Materials Recovery Facility
g. ICT Room/Lab
was maintained and managed at
all times with quality indicators such
as:
* well-maintained
* functional T 5
* accessible
* sufficient
* sustainable
100% of the learning materials were
utilized such as:
* Students Learning Materials E 5
* Teachers Guide
* Reference Materials
* Instructional Materials
satisfying the following indicators: 5.000
Q 5
* adequate
*availability
*beneficial
T 5
5.000
* relevance
T 5
* updated
within the rating period
100% of the teaching and non-
teaching personnel was provided
with the following: E 5
a. LAC sessions
b. Training/ seminars in different
levels
c. SBIM/Monthly Professional Meeting
d. Promotion Q 5 5.000
e. Continuing education
(Graduate Program and Short-
Term courses)
f. Scholarship programs
g. Coaching and Mentoring T 5
program
within the rating period.
Prepared and submitted one
E 5
comprehensive development
plan for teaching and non-teaching
Q 5 5.000
personnel to te SDO before the start
of the school year.
T 5
Q 5
Q 5
5.000
Q 5
T 5
E 5
100% of the financial reports were
submitted with no errors or
Q 5 5.000
revisions on or before the scheduled
date.
T 5
5.000
Q 5
T 5
E 5
5.000
One leading innovation was
E 5
implemented using all aspects
of school governance and leadership 5.000
adapted/adopted by the Division
within the school year. Q 5
Score
0.500
0.250
0.250
0.500
0.400
0.350
0.250
0.250
0.750
0.250
0.250
0.250
0.500
0.100
0.150
0.150
0.150
0.100
5.000
OUTSTANDING
Name of SDS
Schools Division Superintandent
Approving Authority
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIP
Department of Educat
National Capital Regi
SCHOOLS DIVISION OFF
Manila
EMPLOYEE:
POSITION::
DEPARTMENT/SCHOOL:
RATING PERIOD : April 2016 to March 2017
5%
2. Upgraded Professional Education
through the Graduate Program
5%
1. Improved performance on
Special Tasks special task or assignment given
and Other by the immediate superior relative 5%
Assignments to school functions or activities
5% in a given period of time within
the school year always.
(Outside the regular/full teaching
load )
ADJECTIVAL RATINGS
RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500-5.000 Outstanding
3.500-4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500-3.499 Satisfactory
1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory
Below 1.499 Poor
NAME OF RATER:
POSITION:
DATE OF REVIEW: April ___, 2017
T 5
5.000
a. developed tools/instruments
5.000
b. solved classroom-based problem Q 5
c. improved teaching practices
d. validated results and findings
e. improved systems and processes T 5
within the rating period
T 5
T 5
E 5
Q 5 5.000
T 5
5.000
Completed the Graduate Program with E MA/EdD/PhD 5
superior General Weighted Average
5.000
Superior (GWA)
Q 1.0 - 1.25 5
96-100
T 5
Score
1.250
1.000
0.250
0.250
0.500
0.500
0.250
0.500
0.250
0.250
0.250
0.250
5.000
OUTSTANDING
EMPLOYEE:
POSITION:
DEPARTMENT/SCHOOL:
RATING PERIOD : April 2016 - March 2017
3. Intensified feedbacks/updates
to parents/guardians on the 5%
learners' class standing at the
end of every quarter.
1. Ensured participation in regular
1. Improved performance on
Special Tasks special task or assignment given
and Other by the immediate superior relative 5%
Assignments to school functions or activities
5% in a given period of time within
the school year always.
(Outside the regular/full teaching
load )
ADJECTIVAL RATINGS
RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500-5.000 Outstanding
3.500-4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500-3.499 Satisfactory
1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory
Below 1.499 Poor
NAME OF RATER:
POSITION:
DATE OF REVIEW: April ___, 2017
T 5
100% of the lessons were delivered using
E 5
ICT and innovative teaching strategies/
devices with an outstanding evaluation
Q 5
within the rating period always. 5.000
T 5
T 5
Q 5
5.000
T 5
T 1
E 1
100 % of the regular meetings/
E 1
100% of the regular meetings/
conferences were attended and Q 1 1.000
participated actively with excellent
T 1
rating at the end of the school year.
5.000
T 5
100 % involvement in a professional
organization through: E 1
a. Attending meetings
b. Participation in at least 2 activities
c. Updating of membership status
1.000
d. Acted as officer, committee chair Q 1
or co-chair, facilitator, and/or
resource person
within the rating period always.
T 1
Rating Scale
Score
0.500
0.500
0.500
0.500
1.000
0.150
0.050
0.030
0.020
0.050
0.250
0.250
0.050
0.250
3.600
VERY SATISFACTORY