Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2 Requirements
LEARNING OUTCOMES
By the end of this topic, you should be able to:
1. Explain how legislations are enacted;
2. Connect the law with safety objectives;
3. Describe the fundamental concepts of OSH legislation; and
4. Differentiate between the role of authority and the role of industry.
INTRODUCTION
Legislative framework plays a significant role in ensuring the progress of safety
practices in any country. Without the governmentÊs initiatives, occupational
safety and health (OSH) will not become a national agenda. Laws and
regulations are not made for the sake of copying other countries. They are made
by the government to protect the people. In this case, the protection in place is for
the well-being of the workforce.
These Acts usually set out a framework of principles in the areas or issues
involved.
In order to achieve the objectives, Acts are supported by regulations and orders.
Regulations and orders are not necessarily written at the time the Acts were
introduced. They are sometimes added in after the Acts are established to
accommodate new requirements.
2.2.2 Guidelines
Guidelines are documents that present opinions on good practice. One may
apply what is suggested in the guide in his/her workplace. Guidelines have no
legal force. However, because they are developed based on industrial experience,
they are persuasive in practice to the lower courts and in civil cases to establish
reasonable safety standards (Holt, 2006).
Apart from these two Acts, there are also other applicable or related Acts on
construction and plant safety, namely:
(i) Explosive Act 1957.
(ii) Social Security Act 1969.
(iii) Environmental Quality Act 1974.
(iv) Street Drainage and Building Act 1974.
(v) Destruction Disease Bearing Insect Act 1975.
(vi) Town and Country Planning Act 1976.
(vii) Uniform Building By-Laws 1984.
(viii) Fire Service Act 1988.
(ix) Electrical Supply Act 1990.
TOPIC 2 LEGAL REQUIREMENTS 21
However, not all situations can have clear cut instructions like the examples
given as designs and work processes are becoming more complex. However, the
constant focus or primary objective in any working environment should always
be „safety first‰.
Consequently, a question may be posed, „To what extent are safety practices or
control measures required?‰ This question is raised due to the wide range of
activities plus varied scenarios in the construction industry. Imagine and blend
all these together: time constraints, space constraints, fancy designs, different
works at the same time, different works at the same area, works over water and
so on. These are all elements in a construction industry that affect the safety and
well-being of workers.
Responding to the above question, Part IV, Section 15(1) of OSHA 1994 clarifies:
„It shall be the duty of every employer and every self-employed
person to ensure, so far as is practicable, the safety, health and
welfare at work of all his employees.‰
22 TOPIC 2 LEGAL REQUIREMENTS
OSHA 1994 further elaborates „so far as is practicable‰ with these considerations:
The severity of the hazard or risk in question;
The state of knowledge about the hazard or risk and any way of removing or
mitigating the hazard or risk;
The availability and suitability of ways to remove or mitigate the hazard or
risk; and
The cost of removing or mitigating the hazard or risk.
ACTIVITY 2.1
Explore DOSHÊs website where you can find Codes of Practice and
Guidelines and other useful information. You can also download
standard forms used in dealing with DOSH. Share your findings with
your classmates.
SELF-CHECK 2.1
in the United KingdomÊs Health and Safety at Work Act 1974, but they have
required meanings through many interpretations by the courts (HSE, 1997).
Thus, if we compare HSG65Ês views with OSHA 1994, we may assume that
OSHA 1994 is a bit more flexible. It operates between the range of ‰reasonably
practicable‰ to ‰practicable‰. This is because in OSHA 1994, ‰so far as is
practicable‰ also regards the costs involved. It allows employers to conduct a cost
benefit analysis. (Rozanah, 2005).
From the legal perspective, the final decision is for the court to decide whether
actions taken by an employer achieved ‰so far as is practicable‰ or not.
This assumption is incorrect. In reference to past records, FMA 1967 has its origin
from as early as 1876. Today, FMA 1967 is closely connected with the
construction industry. One of the important references for construction found in
FMA 1967 is known as Building Operations and Works of Engineering
Construction Safety Regulations 1986 or in short, BOWEC.
Beginning as a simple rule to regulate the use of steam boilers, FMA 1967
evolved into a more comprehensive legislation to cater to the complex OSH
problems prevailing today (Rozanah, 2009). The following is a chronology of the
earlier legislations that evolved into FMA 1967:
Steam Boilers Ordinance 1876 (Straits Settlements)
Steam Boilers Ordinance 1887 (Straits Settlements)
Machinery Ordinance 1921 (Straits Settlements)
Selangor Steam Boilers (Ashore) Inspection Regulations 1893 (Federated
Malay States)
Selangor Boilers Enactment 1898 (Federated Malay States)
Steam Boilers Enactments of the states of Selangor, Perak, Negeri Sembilan
and Pahang 1908 (Federated Malay States)
Machinery Enactment 1913 (Federated Malay States)
Machinery Enactment 1927 (Federated Malay States)
Machinery Enactment 1932 (Federated Malay States)
Machinery Ordinance 1953 (Federation of Malaya)
Factories and Machinery Act 1967 (Malaysia)
Occupational Safety and Health Act. 1994 (Malaysia )
Factories and Machinery Act (Amendment) 2006 (Malaysia)
There are also records of the first oil well discovered in 1910 in Miri, Sarawak. Later
in 1914, a refinery plant was built (M. Sha, 1996). There were also records regarding
the management of health and safety of workers involved in these operations.
TOPIC 2 LEGAL REQUIREMENTS 25
From the evolution in the legislation concerning OSH, we can safely say that
occupational safety and health is not a new concern in Malaysia and the
legislations on OSH in Malaysia are developed, enacted and amended from time
to time to ensure that they keep up with the changes in the industry.
OSHA 1994 adopts the ‰Self Regulations Concept‰. However, it is important not
to confuse ‰self regulations‰ with Âself-styledÊ approaches in managing hazard.
‰Self-regulation‰ provides freedom for the employers to plan and decide on how
to manage their hazards. Self-regulating practices may exceed or operate within
the scope of ActsÊ requirements. In order to achieve the end objective,
consultation and workersÊ involvement are also part of OSHA 1994Ês philosophy.
The OSHA 1994 principle legislations are supported by rules, regulations and
orders. Generally, it is not necessary for the supporting regulations to be created
in the enactment year itself. Therefore in OSHA 1994, you will find rules,
regulations or orders with the indication of the year it was established.
The term ‰OSHA mother act‰ is another name for OSHA 1994, specifically in its
basic form. OSHA 1994 „grew up‰ and „gave birth‰ to other related items such
as rules, regulations, orders or even schedules. As mentioned earlier, only
ministriesÊ approval are needed for all follow-up or new regulations.
In 2006, FMA 1967 was amended. The new changes included those related to the
definition of ÂfactoryÊ, regarding licensed person, certificate of fitness, revised
fees, notification of accident and a few others. Penalties and imprisonment terms
were also increased. In this amendment, the maximum penalty that can be
imposed stands at RM250,000 and maximum imprisonment term of up to five
years. The amendment involves 30 provisions including the introduction of new
provisions into the FMA 2006 (Rozanah, 2009).
However, even with these changes, the core contents and structure of FMA 1967
generally remain as their original form.
TOPIC 2 LEGAL REQUIREMENTS 29
ACTIVITY 2.2
FMA 1967 was first enacted in 1967. Then in 1994, OSHA 1994 was
enacted. The general rule is, Âfor any same issue referred, OSHA 1994
supercedes FMA 1967.Ê The reason is the latest legislation supercedes
the previous.
Now with the presence of FMA 1967 Amendments 2006, is there any
possibility of FMA superceeding OSHA? Discuss.
SELF-CHECK 2.2
2.6
PRACTICAL COMPLIANCE
Practical compliance may range from behaviours and documentations to physical
compliances. The complete discussion on practical compliance covers many
different aspects. However, in this subtopic, we will only discuss aspects that are
considered as most appropriate. Some explanations are also summarised
accordingly for easier memory retention. Thus, for an in-depth elaboration on the
subject of practical compliance, you are strongly advised to refer directly to
OSHA 1994, FMA 1967 or other sources discussing legislative issues in-depth.
Note: Employers are not allowed to employ persons less than 16 years old. For
more information on ‰young persons‰, you can refer to Section 28, Pt. III FMA
1967 and Section 28(c), Pt. VII OSHA 1994.
TOPIC 2 LEGAL REQUIREMENTS 31
Also refer to FMA Pt IV, Sect. 31. And, FMAÊs First Schedule-Dangerous
Occurrence, Second Schedule-Serious Bodily Injury and Third Schedule-
Industrial Disease)
What if one is found guilty for an offence, but there is no specific penalty
provision for it?
The answer is General Penalty (Part XII Section 51, OSHA 1994).
Fine not exceeding RM10,000 or imprisonment not exceeding 1 year or both and
fine of RM1,000 per day for continuing offence.
What does this mean? It means any unsafe practice is always an offence,
with the possibility of conviction. In conclusion, all safe practices are practical
compliances.
Below are Sections from OSHA 1994 relating to the power of enforcement
officers:
Meanwhile „Safety and Health Officer/s‰ are those who are appointed in
relation with Section 29 and Section 66(2) (t) OSHA 1994 and they are hired by
industries.
„The safety and health officer shall be employed exclusively for the purpose of
ensuring the due observance at the place of work of the provisions of this Act
and any regulation made thereunder and the promotion of a safe conduct of
work at the place of work.‰
In accordance with Section 18, SHO Regulations 1997, the job specifications of an
SHO as outlined in the Act are:
Advise the employer or any person in charge, regarding safety and health.
Safety and health inspections of the place of work including equipment,
process, substance and others which may affect the safety and health of
workers.
Investigate any incident.
Assist the employer or Safety and Health Committee regarding OSH.
As Secretary of Safety and Health Committee (SHC).
Assist SHC in any safety inspection, effectiveness and efficacy of safety
measures taken in compliance with the Act.
36 TOPIC 2 LEGAL REQUIREMENTS
In the FMA mother act, there are three important components which were later
supported by their respective regulations.
They are:
Safety, Health and Welfare (SHW) in Part II.
Persons in Charge and Certificate of Competency in Part III.
Notice of Occupation of Factory, and Registration and Use of Machinery in
Part V.
Note: For JKJ 103, there is no need to submit notification if operation is less than
6 weeks and no machinery is used (Section 35(2) FMA). And the term
‰machinery‰Ê is as defined in FMA.
BOWEC Regulations are quite comprehensive as they cover almost every activity
or item you can find in a constructionÊs environment. Therefore, not all
requirements are covered here. Below is only the overview, and selected and
condensed information. Some relevant and important issues will be discussed in
the next topic.
Part X – Scaffolds
Among the provisions are:
P.E. Design for metal tube scaffold exceeding 40 metres
P.E. Design for other scaffold exceeding 15 metres
Inspections by a competent person
Supported by building
Working platform safety
Construction of tubular scaffold
Part XI – Demolition
A very important requirement is that during demolition, continuing inspections
by a designated person as the work progresses to detect any hazard due to
weakened floors or walls or loosed materials.
ACTIVITY 2.3
Mother act gives the concept and directions, regulations give details.
FMA 1967
Holt, A.S.J., (2006). Principles of Construction Safety. Oxford: Blackwell.
HSG65, (1997). Successful Health and Safety Management. UK: HSE.
M. Sha, J., (1996) in Occupational Safety and Health in Malaysia. NIOSH
Malaysia: 1996. (Compilation of Articles. Edited by Krishna Gopal Rampal &
Noor Hassim Ismail.)
OSHA 1994
Rozanah, A.R., (2005). Duty to Provide Safety and Health Precautions at Work
ÂSo Far As Is PracticableÊ: To What Extent This Limitation Exonerates The
Employer From Strict Liability Offences Under The OSH Legislation? Master
Builders 3rd Quarter 2005.
Rozanah, A.R., (2009). Development of Occupational Safety and Health
Legislation in Malaysia: With Special Reference to the Factories and
Machinery (Amendment) Act 2006. The Law Review 2009, 70–82.