CASE LIST : RULE 62 – 67

JUSTICE PABLITO A. PEREZ

_______________________

Rule 62 : INTERPLEADER

1. Lui Enterprises Inc. v. Zuellig Pharma Corporation et al.

G.R. No. 193494, March 7, 2014 [Leonen]

2. Bank of Commerce v. Planters Development Bank et al.

G.R. No. 154470-71, September 24, 2012 [Brion]

3. Arreza v. Diaz
G.R. No. 133113, August 30, 2001 [Quisimbing]

4. RCBC v. Metro Container Corp.

G.R. No. 127913, September 13, 2001 [Kapunan]

5. Belo Medical Group v. Santos and Belo

G.R. No. 185894, August 30, 2017 [Leonen]

Rule 63: DECLARATORY RELIEF

6. City of Lapu-Lapu v. PEZA

G.R. No. 184203, November 26, 2014 [Leonen]

7. Bro. Mariano “Mike” Velarde v. Social Justice System

G.R. No. 159357, April 28, 2004 [EB]
RTC – SC by R45 on pure question of law

8. Erlinda Reyes et al. v. Hon. Ortiz et al.

G.R. No. 137794, August 11, 2010 [de Castro]

9. Panganiban v. Pilipinas Shell Petroleum Corporation

G.R. No. 131471, January 22, 2003 [Carpio]

10. Republic of the Philippines v. Herminio Roque et al.

G.R. No. 204603, September 24, 2013 [EB; Perlas-Bernabe]

Rule 64: REVIEW OF JUDGMENTS, ORDERS AND RESOLUTIONS OF COMELEC AND COA

11. COMELEC v. Hon. Pe-Aguirre

G.R. No. 171208, September 7, 2007 [EB; Carpio-Morales]
12. Pates v. COMELEC et al.
G.R. No. 184915, June 30, 2009

13. Osmena v. COA

G.R. No. 188818, May 31, 2011

14. Fortune Life Insurance Company Inc. v. COA et al.

G.R. No. 213528, January 27, 2015

Rule 65: Certiorari, prohibition and mandamus

15. Consigna v. Sandiganbayan, et al., G.R. No. 175750-51, June 2, 2014 [ Rule 45 v. Rule 65]
16. Ocampo et al. v. Enriquez et al., G.R. No. 225973, November 18, 2016 [ Marcos burial]
17. Dynamic Builders v. Presbetiro et al., G.R. No. 174202 , April 7, 2015 [ certiorari and prohibition as
simultaneous remedies]
18. Republic v. St. Vincent de Paul, G.R. No. 192908, August 22, 2012, citing Domdom v.
Sandiganbayan [extension of period to file Rule 65 petition]
19. St. Martin Funeral Homes v. NLRC et al., G.R. No. 130866, September 16, 1998 [ certiorari as
remedy from labor rulings]

Rule 66:

20. Velasco v. Belmonte Jr. et al, G.R. No. 211140, January 12, 2016 [ quo warranto v. mandamus]
21. Topacio v. Ong et al., G.R. No. 179895, December 18, 2008 [ quo warranto by relator; claim to
public office]
22. Liban et al. v. Gordon, G.R. No. 175352, July 15, 2009 [ petitioner's claim to office]
23. Hon. Aguinaldo et al. v. His Excellency President Aquino et al., G.R. No. 224302, November 20,
2016 [why Topacio v. Ong does not apply]
24. Republic v. Sereno, G. R. No. 237428, May 11, 2018 [ quo warranto of impeachable officers]

Rule 67 :

25. MMDA v. Bel-Air Village Association Inc., G.R. No. 135962, March 27, 2000 [ police power v.
power of expropriation]
26. Malonzo et al. v. Hon. Zamora et al., G.R. No. 137718, July 27, 1999 [ power of LGU to expropriate]
27. Estate of Jimenez v. Philippine Export Processing Zone, G. R. 137285, January 16, 2001 [ 2 phases of
expropriation proceedings]
28. Republic v. Fernandez, G.R. 174549, March 25, 2015 [ expropriation for government infrastructure
project]
29. NPC v. Posada et al., G.R. No. 191945, March 11, 2015 [ dismissal of expropriation complaint when
purpose ceases to be public]
30. Republic thru NPC v. Heirs of Borbon et al., G.R. No. 165354, January 12, 2015 [ compensation
when expropriation proceedings are terminated]
31. Secretary of DPWH et al. v. Sps. Tecson, G.R. No. 179334, April 21, 2015 [ on reconsideration from
Decision dated July 1, 2013 which must be read with dissenting and concurring opinions; re – basis of
just compensation]
32. Republic v. Gingoyon et al., G.R. 166429, December 19, 2005, which must be read with Republic v.
Hon. Mupas et al., G.R. No. 181892/209917/209696/209731, September 8, 2015 [ expropriation of
NAIA Terminal 3]