Each of these elements must be adequately taken care of in order to
perform an examination to proper quality standards for the task in question. The personnel must be sufficiently trained and qualified, the equipment must meet certain requirements on sensitivity, operability, etc, and procedures must be clearly recorded and understood to ensure that the necessary steps are followed.
An essential part of the procedures is to specify clear criteria for the
reporting of findings, to ensure that the utmost benefit is derived from the inspection. Inspection is not a clear-cut matter and the act of inspection constantly relies on human judgement and discrimination, and hence is usually highly affected by the ability and experience of the inspection team. Thus, in order to ensure consistency, it is necessary that the procedures address this issue and, in particular, find the correct balance between excessive reporting of inconsequential trivia, which results in slow and ineffective inspection, and the alternative risk of ignoring significant indications. The specification of what constitutes a reportable indication and appropriate follow-up procedures will depend on the policy of the owners of the installation.
In other words, the actual practice of inspection must take place
against the background of the Operator's IMR (inspection, maintenance, and repair) philosophy in addition to complying with any local statutory requirements and regulations.