Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Year 4 Mathematics: Number & Algebra – Number and Place Value, Patterns and Algebra
ACMNA074 – Investigate number sequences involving multiples of 3,4,6,7,8 and 9
ACMNA075 – Recall multiplication facts up to 10 x 10 and related division facts
ACMNA081 – Explore and describe number patterns from performing multiplication
For the silver medal: Proposing why numbers would not be in that sequence shows a deep knowledge of the facts used to create and prove the sequence true.
For the bronze: You stated the rule for your number pattern and made sure it was consistent throughout your other working.
To qualify for the next round: Make sure you fully explain all your evidence: ‘6000 because 60 is in the 10th term in the 6 times tables…’
This is true and it shows that you know how to expand into the hundreds and thousands by 10, but tell me more like you did for 1332 and 1322.
Designing strategies & providing effective feedback.
The task itself does not provide much detail as to what students are required to do,
however, it could be safe to assume that depending on how the teacher would assess
the task that they would breakdown the task with students before they complete it;
eluding to objectives and what they should be doing to achieve the best mark
possible.
To keep within the SCSA principle of assessment (2014) that assessments should be
fair and only assess the work completed on that task, it is a reasonable fit for this task
with just one question to focus on the quality and depth of answers given. Being a
mathematics task, it should also incorporate the proficiency strands, the most fitting
here being problem solving and reasoning. Creating the number sequence itself
the number 60, while extending the sequence using multiplication or division
practices (or both) provides an opportunity to show their skills or further applications
of their knowledge. Knowledge and skills only provide so much detail of a student’s
addressing reasoning, students should be proving or stating why their pattern and
To adequately assess this sample given the task completed, a rubric seemed the most
appropriate. Given that it was relatively open ended, what should be assessed is the
overall solution and how they get there as there would not be many specific aspects
self and peer assessment. As the rubric is centred on quality of work, so is the
feedback. Using the analogy of an Olympic podium with medals, the comments
directly focus on the best aspects of their work in descending order; gold being the
most outstanding part to the bronze being something that they still did very well.
However, to ensure that it is not all praise and that there is something for the students
to improve on, they are also given a comment on how to ‘qualify for the next round’.
To best ensure that this is understood, a conversation would still need to be held
between the student and teacher. Moderating with SCSA standards (2014), this
B would gain more from the comments being explained to them and adversely
inform subsequent planning if the student iterates what they did not understand in the