Name of Presenter:

0-40 Fail 40-50 Marginal 50-60 Pass 60-70 Good Pass 70-100 Merit Notes
Fail
Good choice of - The article does - The article - The article falls within any - The paper is of high - The article shows new /5
not fall within any marginally falls learning outcome for the interest within the module development with a
article learning outcome within any learning module, it is of good quality and brings some element high impact in terms of
for the module outcome for the scientifically of innovation sustainability
- It is apparent that module -Some initial thought on was -Good critical thinking on - Exceptionally well
it was randomly - The choice was given on the choice the decision is evident elaborated and motivated
chosen based on very poor choice
reflection on why
this could be
relevant
Summary of the - Very poor - Somewhat fails to - The material is adequately The material is well Exceptionally well /25
summary, it is not provide a summary, presented, the summary is structured, good thematic summarized, the
article clear what is some elements are adequately structured with summary, definition of key summary is very well
content, there is there but they are separation in themes, the points from the data or structured and divided in
no detail on the poorly conveyed results and summary are results, elements of critical key themes, data are
rationale for the and communicated, adequately communicated review are more relevant elaborated and critically
work, introduction, it is not clear what the critical analysis is discussed
methodology is the content of the generally not sufficiently
paper and results developed
are not well
understood
Presentation - The presentation - The presentation is - The presentation is - The presentation is well - Very strong /10
is extremely poor, poor, slightly off adequate, slightly off time, made, on time, body presentation,
and ability to not in time, poor time, body body language, voice and language, voice and eye exceptional
answer body language, language, voice and eye contact are adequate, contact are show communication skills,
poor use of voice, eye contact are some elements can be confidence, the message pauses are efficiently
questions extremely difficult weak, some understood, slides are is well conveyed, slides designed as well as
to understand, no elements can be adequate for the content, are good clear and well slide transitions, very
eye contact, read understood but in read some notes but not prepared, doesn’t need to clear slides, the focus
continuously from general the disturbing the delivery read notes is more on the speaker
notes, slides communication is rather than on the
poorly organized not effective, slides slides
show some
organization but not
proportioned
Total /40
The part I really appreciate was

The best suggestion I can offer is

The best thing about the speech