You are on page 1of 11

Modeling of Solute Redistribution in the Mushy

Zone during Solidification of Aluminum-Copper Alloys


Q.Z. DIAO and H.L. T S A I

A mathematical m o d e l has been established to predict the formation o f macrosegregation f o r a


unidirectional solidification o f aluminum-copper alloys cooled from the bottom. The model,
based on the continuum formulation, allows the calculation o f transient distributions o f tem-
perature, velocity, and species in the solidifying alloy caused by thermosolutal convection and
shrinkage-induced fluid flow. Positive segregation in the casting near the bottom (inverse seg-
regation) is found, w h i c h is accompanied by a moving negative-segregated mushy z o n e . The
effects o f shrinkage-induced fluid flow and solute diffusion on the formation o f macrosegre-
gation are examined. It is found that the redistribution o f solute in the solidifying alloy is caused
by the flow o f solute-rich liquid in the mushy zone due to solidification shrinkage. A higher
heat-extraction rate at the bottom increases the solidification r a t e , decreasing the size o f the
mushy zone, reducing the flow o f solute-rich liquid in the mushy zone and, as a result, lessening
the severity o f inverse segregation. Comparisons between the theoretical predictions from the
present study and previous modeling results and available experimental data are m a d e , and good
agreements are obtained.

I. INTRODUCTION momentum, energy, and species equations are not com-


pletely coupled. Perhaps the first rigorous m o d e l to pre-
SOLIDIFICATION o f alloys is characterized by the dict the formation o f macrosegregation was described in
existence o f a mushy z o n e , in w h i c h the solid phase and the pioneering articles by Flemings and co-workers.[5,6.7]
liquid phase coexist. It has been reported that transport The well known "local solute redistribution equation"
phenomena (i.e., heat and mass transfer and fluid flow) was derived, w h i c h predicted successfully the formation
in the mushy zone are the major cause for the formation o f inverse segregation, centerline segregation, and seg-
o f casting defects, such as segregation, porosity, and hot regation resulting from changes o f cross section for uni-
tears, tL2] In particular, the formation o f macrosegrega- directional solidification o f AI-Cu alloys. However, the
tion (i.e., a large-scale nonuniformity in composition) in solute diffusion was neglected, and the thermal gradients
castings is understood to be caused by two mechanisms and velocity distributions used in the equation were mea-
occurring in the mushy zone.Lm] The f i r s t mechanism cor- sured o r assumed.
responds to the floating or settling o f precipitated phases Kato and Cahoon t81 studied the inverse segregation in
during solidification. The precipitated phases could be directionally solidified A1-Cu-Ti alloys with equiaxed
the equiaxed grains and/or broken dendrites in the mushy grains based on the theory proposed by Kirkaldy and
zone. The other mechanism is related to the flow o f solute- Youdelis and reported that the theoretical predictions were
rich o r solute-poor liquid in the m u s h y z o n e . The fluid consistent with the experimental measurements. Ohnaka
flow can be caused by solidification contraction a n d / o r and Matsumoto t9,1°] have analyzed the unidirectional so-
thermala n d / o r solutal gradients. A higher concentration lidification o f A1-Cu alloys based on the conservation o f
o f solute is frequently found near the bottom surface o f momentum, energy, and species and have incorporated
a casting unidirectionally solidified from the bottom, the solute diffusion effects. However, they did not show
the transient solute distribution, and the importance o f
which is commonly called inverse segregation. Inverse
shrinkage-induced flow on the formation o f macrosegre-
segregation is a kind o f macrosegregation that has been
gation was not discussed.
reported to be caused by solidification contraction. [1] Recently, Bennon and Incropera [1~,12] and Beckermann
In the past, many experimer, tal and theoretical studies and Viskantatl3j developed the "continuum formulation"
on the formation o f inverse segregation have been re- based on the classical mixing theory or volume aver-
ported. Scheilt3] developed an expression w h i c h can pre- aging technique, w h i c h is valid f o r the entire casting do-
dict the "maximum segregation" at the chill surface as main, including the solid phase, mushy z o n e , and liquid
a function o f alloy composition in a unidirectionally so- phase. Employing the continuum formulation, many
lidified ingot. Kirkaldy and Youdelis t4] extended Scheil's multidimensional solidification problems involving a
equation to predict not only the maximum segregation complete coupling o f momentum, energy, and species
but the positional variation o f the segregation. Their equations have been solved. Neilson and I n c r o p e r a[141 used
model, however, is limited to one dimension, and the the continuum formulation to study the unidirectional so-
lidification o f aqueous NH4C1 and the effects o f the
compositionally-induced fluid motion. As aqueous N H 4 C I
Q.Z. DIAO, Graduate Student, and H.L. TSAI, Associate Professor liquid in the mushy zone is enriched by the lighter H20
of Mechanical Engineering, are with the Department of Mechanical
and Aerospace Engineering and Engineering Mechanics, University species when solid NHaC1 is precipitated, a density in-
of Missouri-Rolla, Rolla, MO 65401. version is created, leading to pronounced freckle phe-
Manuscripts submitted September 1 7 , 1992. nomena. [14] In the above-mentioned continuum

METALLURGICAL TRANSACTIONS A VOLUME 24A, APRIL 1993--963


formulation, with the exception o f the buoyancy t e r m s , 0
a constant density was assumed throughout the entire do- -(pv) + V.(oVv) = V. /m_PVv~ 0p m p (v-v,)
dt Oy K Pl
main, and as a result, the shrinkage effect was neglected.
For unidirectional solidification of A1-Cu alloys cooled
C•2
from the bottom, as the heavier copper species is re- Kl/=pl IV -- V,I (V -- V,)
j e c t e d when the solid aluminum is precipitated, stable
solute and temperature gradients are created, and no nat-
ural convection can be induced. H e n c e , the inverse seg-
regation in directionally solidified A1-Cu alloys cannot
be predicted by the above-mentioned models. Chiang and
Tsai usa61 have modified the continuum formulation to in- + Pg(~r ( T -- To) + ~ , ( f f -f~,o))
clude the fluid flow and domain change caused by so-
lidification contraction. In their study, they concluded [3]
that shrinkage-induced fluid flow is dominated in the
mushy zone compared with the natural convection due where u and v are the velocities in the x- and
to temperature gradients. As the fluid flow in the mushy y-directions, respectively, and Vr (= Vz - V,) is the rel-
zone is the major cause o f the formation o f macrosegre- ative velocity vector between the liquid phase and the
gation, the m o d e l will be extended in the present study solid phase. The subscripts s and l refer to the solid and
to include the species equation to investigate the solute liquid phases, respectively; p is the pressure; /~ is the
redistribution in the mushy zone during unidirectional viscosity; f is the mass fraction; K, the permeability
solidification o f A1-Cu alloys cooled from the bottom. function o f the casting, is a measure o f the ease with
w h i c h fluids pass through the porous m u s h y zone; C is
II. M A T H E M A T I C A L FORMULATION the inertial coefficient; fir and t , are the thermal e x p a n -
sion coefficient and solutal expansion coefficient, r e -
The model, based on the continuum formulation in-
spectively; g is gravitational acceleration; and T is the
cluding the effect o f shrinkage developed by Chiang and casting temperature. The subscript 0 represents initial
Tsai,u5,161 is used in the present study. In the derivation
condition, and the superscript a represents species. The
o f the governing equations, the following assumptions third and fourth terms on the right-hand side o f Eqs. [2]
are made: (1) the properties o f the solid and liquid phases and [3] represent the first- and second-order drag forces,
are homogeneous and isotropic; (2) the solid and liquid respectively, for the flow in the mushy zone. The second-
phases in the mushy zone are in local thermodynamic to-last term on the right-hand side o f Eq. [2] and the
equilibrium; (3) the density f o r each phase is constant third term from the last on the right-hand side o f E q . [3]
but can be different for the liquid and solid phases; (4) represent an interaction between the solid and the liquid
the Boussinesq approximation for natural convection can
phases. These two terms are zero except in the mushy
be invoked; (5) no pore formation is present; and (6) z o n e , in w h i c h case neither f, nor f/is zero. The last term
binary alloys. Based on the continuum formulation, the on the right-hand side o f Eq. [2] and the second-to-last
continuity, momentum, energy, and species equations term on the right-hand side o f E q . [3] represent the effect
for the solidification o f a two-dimensional casting are o f shrinkage, and both terms are identical to zero when
given as follows: the density difference between the solid and liquid phases
Continuity is not considered. The last term on the right-hand side
o f Eq. [3] is based on the Boussinesq approximation f o r
0 natural convection. It is noted that Eqs. [2] and [3] re-
Ot (p) + V. (pV) = 0 [1] duce to appropriate single-phase limits ( i . e . , K is zero
in the pure solid and K is infinite in the pure liquid, see
where t is the time, p is the density, and V is the velocity also E q . [8]).
vector.
Momentum Energy

Ot(Ou) + V-(pVu) V txt Vu Ox


-ot(Ph) + V . ( p V h ) = V. ~ V h + V- V(h,-h)

-
/*t
-
P- ( u - u,)

K Pz -- V . ( p ( V - V , ) (hi - h))

Ca2 [4]
K , / % lu - u , l ( u - u,)
where h is the enthalpy, k is the thermal conductivity,
- V. (pf~V,u,) and c is the specific heat. The f i r s t two terms on the
fight-hand side o f E q . [4] represent the net Fourier dif-
[2] fusion flux. The last term represents the energy flux as-
sociated with the relative phase motion.

964--VOLUME 24A, APRIL 1993 METALLURGICAL TRANSACTIONS A


Species Tm is the fusion temperature w h e n f~ = 0, and the equi-
librium partition ratio kp is the ratio o f the slopes for the
0 liquidus and solidus lines. It is noted that the assumption
(pff') + V . (pVf ~) = t7. ( p D T f'~) + 17. (pD17(f7 - f ' ~ ) ) o f l o c a l equilibrium does not preclude the existence o f
a nonequilibrium condition o n a macroscopic scale.
- 17. (p(V - Vs) (fit - f~)) [5] In the previous governing differential equations
(Eqs. [1] through [5]), there is a solid-phase velocity.
where D is the mass diffusion coefficient. The first two The solid-phase velocity is associated with the m o v e -
terms on the right-hand side o f E q . [5] represent the net ment o f precipitated solid equiaxed grains a n d / o r broken
Fickian diffusion flux, while the last term represents the dendrites in the mushy zone. Generally, there are certain
species flux due to relative phase motion. In Eqs. [1] relations between the solid-phase and liquid-phase ve-
through [5], the continuum density, specific heat, ther- locities; t2°1 however, the exact relations are not known
mal conductivity, mass diffusivity, solid mass fraction, at this time. A l s o , under the condition o f unidirectional
liquid mass fraction, velocity, enthalpy, and mass frac- solidification cooled from the bottom, the solid phase is
tion o f constituent a are defined as follows: likely to be stationary. Hence, we assume the solid-phase
P = g~P~ + g~Pt; c = f s c s "~-flCl; k = g,k~ + gtkt velocity is zero in the present study, and the equations
are simplified accordingly.
gsPs gtPl
D = f~19~ + f~Dt; f~ = , ft = - -
P P
III. NUMERICAL METHOD
V = f~Vs + j~Vt; h = f~hs + fthD f'~ = f~J~ + f t f f
The governing equations are in the general format, as
[61
suggested by Patankar, t211 for the numerical solution o f
where gs and gt a r e the volume fractions o f the solid and heat and fluid flow problems ( i . e . , they contain a tran-
liquid phases, respectively. sient term, a diffusion term, a convection term, and source
If the phase specific heats are assumed constant, the terms). H e n c e , any established numerical procedure for
phase enthalpy for the solid and liquid can be expressed solving coupled elliptic partial differential equations can
as be used, with slight modifications f o r the source terms.
In the present study, the equations were solved itera-
hs = csT; hI = cIT + ( cs - Cl)Te + H [7] tively at each time step using the control-volume-based
where H is the latent heat o f the alloy and Te is the eu- finite difference procedure described by Patankar. t211 A
tectic temperature. fully implicit formulation was used for the time-dependent
The assumption o f permeability function in the mushy t e r m s , and the combined convection/diffusion coeffi-
zone requires consideration o f the growth morphology cients were evaluated using an upwind scheme. The
specific to the alloy under study. In the present study, SIMPLEC algorithm was applied to solve the momen-
the permeability function analogous to fluid flow in the tum and continuity equations to obtain the velocity field.
porous media is assumed, employing the Carman-Kozeny At each time step, the momentum equations were solved
equationt174s~ f i r s t in the iteration process using the most updated vol-
ume fractions o f solid and liquid f o r the mixture density,
gts 180 the permeability function, and the mass fractions o f solid
K - ci = [8] and liquid. T h e n , the energy equation was solved to ob-
cl (i - gt)2' d2
tain enthalpy, with w h i c h the temperature can be cal-
where d is proportional to the dendrite dimension, which culated. Similarly, the species equation was solved to
is assumed to be a constant and is on the o r d e r o f 1 0 -2 obtain the concentration distribution. Next, the volume
cm. The inertial coefficient, C, can be calculated fromt~91 fractions o f solid and liquid, the permeability, and the
C = O. 13gl 3/2 [9] mass fractions o f solid and liquid can be updated. This
process was repeated for each iteration step. F o r each
Closure o f the system o f conservation equations re- time step, iterations were terminated when the maximum
quires supplementary relations. With the assumption o f residual source o f m a s s , momentum, energy, and spe-
l o c a l thermodynamic equilibrium, the required relations cies was less than 1 × 10-5. A line-by-line solver, based
may be obtained from the equilibrium phase diagram. on the tridiagonal matrix algorithm (TDMA), was used
Neglecting the curvatures in the solidus and liquidus lines to solve iteratively the algebraic discretization equations.
in the phase diagram, the solid mass fraction and solid- The last five terms on the fight-hand side o f E q . [2], the
and liquid-phase compositions can be expressed as last six terms on the fight-hand side o f E q . [3], and the
last two terms on the fight-hand side o f Eqs. [4] and [5]
represent the source terms and are treated according to
f " = l " ~ - ~ p LT-----Z~mJ ; ~ = '1 + f ~ ( l c p - l) ' the procedure suggested by Patankar.mJ More details about

[ 1 }.,, the computational procedure used in the present study


can be found in the previous articles, t~5,~61
ff = 1 + f ~ ( k p - 1) [10] As the governing equations are valid in the pure liquid
and solid regions and the mushy z o n e , there is no need
where T I is the liquidus temperature corresponding t o f ~, to t r a c k the geometrical shape and the extent o f each

METALLURGICAL TRANSACTIONS A VOLUME 24A, APRIL 1993--965


region. Hence, a fixed-grid system was used in the nu- present study should be reliable. A variable time-step
merical calculation. Figure 1 shows the grid system of size is used in the calculation to provide optimum so-
the casting domain. A grid system of 46 x 61 points lution accuracy while maintaining numerical stability. The
was utilized for the casting domain of 4 × 20 cm. Due initial time-step size is 0.0001 seconds, and the m a x i -
to the symmetry of the domain, only half of the grid mum time-step size is 0.025 seconds. The calculations
points (i.e., 23 x 61) were used in the actual calcula- were executed on Apollo DN10000 and HP*-730 work-
tion. The grid was slightly skewed to provide a h i g h e r
concentration of nodal points near the bottom of the cast- *HP is a trademark of Hewlett-Packard Company, Colorado Springs,
ing, where larger temperature and solutal gradients were Co.
present. A finer grid system will certainly give more ac-
curate computational results, but the CPU time needed stations. Typical CPU time required for the calculation
for the computation will also be increased. Hence, the of each case is about 100 hours.
mesh size used in the present work is a compromise be-
tween the accuracy and the computational cost. During
solidification, due t o density change, the total casting
IV. R E S U L T S AND D I S C U S S I O N
domain decreases with time. The domain change is han-
dled by the front tracking method, and a detailed de- A . Temperature, Velocity, and Solute Distributions
scription can be found in previous publications. [~5,~6] It
is noted that the numerical method used in the present As shown in Figure 1, a unidirectional solidification
study has been extensix, ely tested by the authors in many can be induced by passing some coolant at a desired tem-
other problems,t22] Hence, the results obtained from the perature, To through a chill placed at the bottom of the
casting while the other sides of the casting are insulated.
Heat transfer between the chill and the casting is accom-
4.0 cm plished via convection through an effective convective
I-- =l heat-transfer coefficient he. An A1-4.1 wt pet Cu alloy
is used in the present s t u d y , and its thermophysical p r o p -
erties and the casting conditions are summarized in
Table I.
As the casting will start t o solidify from the bottom,
there will be an upward positive temperature gradient in
the casting. Hence, it is expected that a stable temper-
ature field exists in the casting, and no natural convec-
tion due to inverse temperature gradients is present. Also,
during alloy solidification, heavier copper species will
be rejected starting from the bottom. Hence, it is ex-
pected that more copper species will be accumulated in
the lower portion of the casting, creating a stable neg-
ative solutal gradient. In other words, neither tempera-
ture gradients nor solutal gradients will induce natural

20.0 cm
Table I. Thermophysical Properties
of AI-4.1 Pet Cu and Casting Conditions

Symbol Value Unit Reference


Cs 1.0928 J g-lK-l 23
Ct 1.0588 J g-~K -1 23
ition Dt 3 × 10-5 c m 2 s -- ~ assumed
Ds ~0 assumed
ks 1.9249 W cm-lK 23
kt 0.8261 W cm-lK 23
kp 0.170 23
p, 2.65 g c m -3 23
Pt 2.40 g cm-3 23
/3T 4.95 × 10-5 K-~ assumed
/3, -2.0 assumed
/z 0.03 g cm-~s-1 23
H 397.5 j g-1 23
Te 821.2 K 23
Tm 933.2 K 23
ff.o 4.1 Pct
To 970.0 K
Tc 293.0 K
Fig. 1--Schematic representation of the physical domainand the mesh hc 0.02 W cm-2K-1
system.

966--VOLUME 24A, APRIL 1993 METALLURGICAL TRANSACTIONS A


convection in the casting. Hence, under the solidifica- casting is given in Figure 4(b). It is seen that the con-
tion conditions used in the present study, the only pos- tinuum velocity is constant in the pure liquid p h a s e and
sible driving force for the fluid flow in the casting is decreases abruptly toward the chill in the m u s h y zone.
solidification contraction. However, the actual liquid-phase velocity remains very
Figure 2(a) shows the isotherms in the casting at a high in most portions of the m u s h y zone, compared to
time of 180 seconds. As expected, all isotherms are planar, the continuum velocity in the pure liquid phase.
and the temperature increases upward. Corresponding
temperature distribution along the vertical direction is
given in Figure 2(b). The liquidus and solidus fronts are 15 ' ' ' ' I ' ' ' ' I ' ' ' ' l ' ' ' ' I . . . .

also shown in the figure, indicating the regions of solid


phase, m u s h y zone, and liquid phase. T h e positions of
the liquidus front and solidus front and the size of the
m u s h y z o n e as functions of time are shown in Figure 3.
It is seen that the size of the m u s h y z o n e increases with
time as it moves away from the chill. Figure 4(a) shows Pure Liquid
the velocity distribution in the casting at a time of 180
seconds. As explained above, the fluid flow is caused e.-

only by solidification contraction; hence, the direction


of the velocity is toward the chill. The length of the arrow
in the figure represents the magnitude of the velocity.
T h e velocity is generally small compared with typical
values found in forced convection or natural convection.
With the exception of the no-slip condition at the wall, 5 \O,d ~ Mushy Zone _
the velocity in the m u s h y z o n e becomes nearly uniform
in the horizontal direction, which is caused b y the fact
that an isotropic permeability function is assumed in the
present study. It is noted that the velocity shown in the
figure is the continuum velocity, as defined in Eq. [6],
o
which is weighted b y the liquid fraction (the solid-phase 0 50 100 150 200 250
velocity is assumed to be zero in the present study). A Time (sec)
more detailed velocity profile along the centerline of the
Fig. 3--Positions of the liquidus and solidus fronts as functions of
time.
15.0

' ' ' ' I ' ' " 15.0


I ' ' ' '
' l l | l | l l l l l l | l a
953.116 I I I I ~ I I | I I I | I I
~ l l l l l l l l l l l l l '
' l l l l l l l l l l l l l ~
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l Continuum Velocity
I l l l l l l l l l l l l l t
' l l l l l l l l l l l | l o V = lsVs + fiVt
l I | l I | l l l l l l l l
I I | l l l l l l l l l l l l
10.0 ' I | l l l l l l l l l l l j
Liquid Phase
Pure Liquid
937.042
g l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
411111111l|III' Velocity V] 10.0
& ~ I I l I L I I I I | I I I * Pure Liquid
o l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
e- J l | l l l l l l l l l l l ~
' l | l l l l l l l l l | l I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
E l l l l l l l l l l l l l l ' 6
~ | | | | l l l l l l i l | l
I | l l l l l l l l l | l l E
920,967
o
~5 l l l l l l l l l l l i | l
[ill l l l l l l l | II
i £:
| l l l l l l l l l l l l oo
U L I 2 U L I 2 H L~
P l l l l l l l l l | | I | l
904,893 t21 I | I I I I I i t 1 1 1 1 1 1
5.0 r-~
IIiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii I
' 888.819
M u s h y Zone 5.0
Mushy Zone
- 872.744 t
I
/
856.67
.=_=.:.=.-_.~. ......................
- 840.596
Pure Solid
- 824.521 Pure Solid

808.447
0.0 i i i , I , , i i I , , J , 0.0
700 800 900 1000 0,00 2.50 5.00 7,50
Temperature (°C) Velocity (10"3cm/sec)

(a) (b) (a) (b)


Fig. 2 - - ( a ) I s o t h e r m s : (b) temperature distribution along the vertical Fig. 4 - - ( a ) V e l o c i t y vectors: (b) velocity distribution along the
direction at t = 1 8 0 s . centerline i n the vertical direction at t = 1 8 0 s .

METALLURGICAL TRANSACTIONS A V O L U M E 24A, APRIL 1993--967


Figure 5(a) shows the isoconcentrations in the casting In o r d e r to explain the phenomena observed in
that are planar, similar to the isotherms. However, the Figure 5(b), detailed solute distributions in the casting
copper concentration does not decrease monotonically are given in Figure 6. In Figure 6(a), the l o c a l solute
from the bottom as the temperature field; instead, it de- concentration in the solid phase, ff~, is defined as the
creases, up to some location in the mushy z o n e , to a mass fraction o f solute in a unit mass o f solid phase.
minimum concentration l o w e r than the initial value, and Similarly, the l o c a l solute concentration in the liquid
then increases to the initial copper concentration. The phase, i f , is defined as the mass fraction o f solute in a
copper concentration along the vertical direction is shown unit mass o f liquid phase. During solidification, copper
in Figure 5(b), where it can be clearly seen that a positive- species is rejected into the liquid phase, and as a result,
segregated (i.e., above the initial copper concentration) the local solute concentration o f the liquid phase in the
region near the chili and a negative-segregated (i.e., below mushy zone increases continuously toward the chill, as
the initial copper concentration) mushy zone are present. shown in Figure 6(a). As the solute concentration o f solid
The higher copper concentration in the solidified casting phase in the mushy zone is equal to the partition ratio
near the chilled surface is commonly called inverse seg- times the solute concentration in the liquid phase, it also
regation. There is an abrupt change in solute concentra- increases toward the chill. In the pure liquid region, if/
tion at both the solidus and liquidus fronts, and the copper is constant, but in the pure solid region, ff~ increases to-
concentration in the pure liquid phase remains the same ward the chili. The corresponding solid fraction, fs, and
as the initial value. Except in the region very near the
liquid fraction, f~, in the casting, as defined in E q . [6],
solidus front, the copper concentration in the mushy zone
are shown in Figure 6(b). The liquid fraction increases,
is below the initial value. It is noted that the total solute
starting from zero at the solidus front, to units at the
accumulated in the positive-segregated region must be
equal to the total solute depreciated in the negative- liquidus f r o n t and beyond. Similarly, the solid fraction
segregated region in order to satisfy the conservation o f increases, starting from zero at the liquidus front, to units
total solute. It is also noted that a positive solutal gra- at the solidus front and toward the chill. The product
dient exists between the location with minimum solute f~ffl, the total a m o u n t o f solute in the solid phase per
concentration in the mushy zone and the liquidus front.
However, the positive solutal gradient is caused by the
downward shrinkage-induced flow and, hence, cannot 10.0 30.0
' I . . . .
create natural convection. In fact, a negative solutal gra- : . . . . I' . . . . ' ' 'I'
dient exists for the liquid phase in the entire mushy z o n e , :Pure Solid.~ Mushy Zone i Pure Liquid

which will be discussed next.

u,._=
7.5

5.0 ,i i\,
i
i
i
i
i
i
22.5

15.0
=._-
.... I ' ' ' 1 . . . . I .... 15.0 2.5 7.5

]1
0.0 . . . . , , , , I , ,i , I , = = =
0.0
(a)

I . . . . I ' " I "

iI
t

10.0 1.0 fs i 1.0


Pure Liquid
l=

t-
0.5 0.5
O
E
0.0 . . . . 0.0

~
4.10000
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
8t-
.... 4~;0; (b)
3.95948
.to
t~
Low 5.0 7.5 . . . . II . . . . I " '1 ' " I . . . . 7.5
. Mushy Zone i
i i
3,9sg48
! I

4,04603
•.-= 5.0 ~ s f l ~ ~" ~= 5.0

4.17585 2.5 i ~ _ _ ~ , , i[i 2.5


4.2624

1,47878
,,, .... , , , , 7 1 " ; , , 0.0
0.0
0.0
, , i i
2.5 5.0 7.5
. . i . . . . 0.0
10.0
3.75 4.00 4.25 4,50 4.75 Distance from Chill (cm)
Solute Concentration (%)
(c)
(a) (b)
Fig. 6 - - ( a ) Local solute distributions in the s o l i d and l i q u i d phases:
Fig. 5 - - ( a ) Isoconcentrations: (b) solute distribution along the ver- (b) distributions of s o l i d and l i q u i d fractions: (c) total s o l u t e i n the
tical direction at t = 180 s. s o l i d and liquid phases, all at t = 180 s.

968--VOLUME 24A, APRIL 1993 METALLURGICAL TRANSACTIONS A


unit mass o f mixture (liquid and solid mixture in the m u - in Eqs. [2] and [3] (i.e., the last term and the second-
shy zone), increases toward the chili. On the other hand, to-last term on the right-hand side o f E q . [2] and Eq. [3],
the product, j ~ / , the total amount o f solute in the liquid respectively)• The density is constant throughout the
phase per unit mass o f alloy mixture, decreases toward casting, and the average value o f the solid and liquid
the chill. The final solute concentration, f~, as given in densities given in Table I is used in the modeling. U n d e r
Eq. [6], is the sum o f these two products, i.e., this condition, there is no fluid flow in the alloy, and
f~ = f s f ~ + f ~ f f [11] the solute redistribution is caused only by the diffusion
mechanism. As the copper species will be rejected into
which is plotted in Figure 5(b). Hence, from the above
the liquid phase during solidification, the solute concen-
discussion, it is understood that the formation o f a tration in the m u s h y zone is slightly h i g h e r than that in
negative-segregated mushy zone is caused by the flow the pure solid phase, as shown in Figure 8. A maximum
o f solute-rich liquid in the mushy zone due to solidifi- solute concentration occurs in the mushy zone near the
cation contraction. However, near the chill at the bottom liquidus front. However, the difference in solute distri-
o f the casting, the velocity o f the fluid carrying solute bution for the entire casting is relatively small compared
slows down (and becomes zero at the wall), causing the with that in Figure 7, because the species diffusion is a
solute to pile up, w h i c h leads to the inverse segregation very slow process, evidenced by a small value o f mass
in the casting. diffusion coefficient given in Table I. It is noted that a
Figure 7 shows a sequence o f solute concentration slightly lower solute concentration in the pure solid phase
profiles during solidification. The higher solute concen- and the l o w e r portion o f the mushy zone is compensated
tration in the region near the chill increases with time by the h i g h e r concentration in the upper portion o f the
until the region is solidified, then the solute concentra- mushy zone near the liquidus front, so that the overall
tion in the solid phase remains unchanged, because the conservation o f copper species is satisfied.
mass diffusion coefficient in the solid phase is negligible.
2. I f the solute diffusion is neglected
B . Factors Affecting the Solute Distribution Solute diffusion in the casting can be neglected if the
As the solid-phase velocity is assumed zero in the solute diffusion coefficient D in Eq. [5] is assumed to
present study, solute redistribution in a solidifying cast- be zero. U n d e r this condition, Figure 9 illustrates the
ing can be caused only by fluid flow and diffusion m e c h - solute distribution in the casting at a time o f 180 sec-
anisms. If there is no fluid flow and no solute diffusion, onds. By comparing Figure 5(b) with Figure 9, nearly
the solute concentration should remain the same as the identical solute distribution in the casting is found. This
initial value. Since shrinkage-induced flow is the only implies that u n d e r the conditions o f the present study,
possible flow for the unidirectional solidification consid- the solute redistribution is controlled mainly by the fluid
ered in the present study, the effects o f shrinkage-induced flow due to solidification shrinkage. The result is also
flow and solute diffusion on the solute redistribution are consistent with the previous discussion concluding that
discussed in the following. the diffusion mechanism is not the primary factor con-
tributing to the formation o f macrosegregation. Hence,
1. I f the shrinkage-induced flow is neglected
The shrinkage effect can be neglected in the mathe- it is concluded that the formation o f inverse segregation
matical modeling by nullifying the corresponding terms

4.75 =1 ' ' ' ' I ' '' ' I


4.75 . . . . i i
i i
f I . . . . I . . . . I ' i i
i i
i i
i i
i i
1: 20 sec 4.50 I I
4.50 - A
i M u s h y Zone i
: 60 see o~ i i
=.,_ i i
: 120 sec
c"
i i
! I
=" 4 : 1 8 0 sec o
o • !
4.25 ! I
~ 4.25 e'- i i
e,-
Q) i i
t-
o
i! f c = f s f s ¢ + f t f t~ I
t-
O (0
O • I
= i
i i
4.00 i i
o 4.00 -1 i i
c0 i i

4
i i
I
i i
3 i i
ii l , , , , I ,,
i , , I
3.75 . . . . ' '
3.75 . . . . i . . . . i . . . . i , 0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0
0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0
D i s t a n c e f r o m C h i l l (cm)
Distance fromChill (cm)
Fig. 8 - - S o l u t e distribution w h e n shrinkage-induced f l o w is n e g l e c t e d
Fig. 7 - - S o l u t e d i s t r i b u t i o n at d i f f e r e n t t i m e s . at t = 1 8 0 s .

METALLURGICAL TRANSACTIONS A V O L U M E 24A, A P R I L 1 9 9 3 - - 9 6 9


4.75 4.75
. . . . ii . . . . i , ,i , , i . . . . , , a I . . . . I 'I ° ' I
i i
i i i
i i = i
i i i i
i i i i
i i i i
i i i i
i i i i
4.50 i i 4.50 i
~ [ MushyZone [ i Mushy Zone i
i i
i i
. i i
t- i i t- I I
0 i i O i i
i i
"~ 4.25 i i 4.25 i i
t- i i
o i i O
o i ct a ct i
o# - f = I s i s +tlfl i c-
O
f= = fs fO + f l f l tz ii
0 i
0
--'s
i
"" i i i i
4.00 i i "5 4.00 i i
o9 i i 09 i i
i i
I I i i
i i i i
i i I
• i
i
i i i I
3.75 . . . . ; I , , ~ I , ,= ~ , I , , , , 3.75 , [I , , , I , , i , , I . . . .
0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0
Distance from Chill (cm) Distance from Chill (cm)
F i g . 9 - - S o l u t e d i s t r i b u t i o n w h e n s o l u t e d i f f u s i o n i s n e g l e c t e d at t = Fig. 10--Solute distribution when both shrinkage-induced flowand
180 s. solute diffusion are neglected at t = I80 s.

near the bottom o f the casting is caused by solidification Og, 1 - fl v . VT~ g_,
contraction. It is noted that solute diffuses from locations - - = - 1 + ! [12]

o f higher concentration to locations o f l o w e r concentra-


tion, while solute transportation by fluid flow depends
on the direction o f the fluid flow. In the present study, w h e r e / 3 is the solidification contraction, e is the rate o f
temperature change, and VT is the temperature gradient.
the fluid flow is caused only by shrinkage, and the solute-
rich liquid flows toward the bottom o f the casting. How- Equation [12] was derived by combining the conserva-
ever, the solute diffuses upward from the higher tion o f solute mass and the conservation o f total mass.
concentration at the bottom o f the casting. The net result The solute diffusion was neglected in the derivation. It
is that the maximum segregation at the bottom o f the is noted that in order to use E q . [12], the data regarding
casting in Figure 9 is slightly higher than that in Figure velocity distribution, temperature gradients, and the rate
5(b). o f temperature change must be obtained first. Flemings
et a l . [ 5 ' 6 ' 7 ] obtained the data through experimental mea-
3. I f both the solute diffusion and shrinkage-induced surements o r by assumptions, and they used the equation
.[low are neglected to successfully predict the formation o f inverse segre-
In this case, both the solute diffusion coefficient in
gation and banding segregation. In the present study, the
E q . [5] and terms related to shrinkage effect in Eqs. [2]
and [3] are set to zero. U n d e r this condition, it is ex- velocity and temperature distributions calculated from
pected that there is no solute redistribution, and the sol- the momentum and energy equations (i.e., Eqs. [1]
ute concentration in the entire casting should be equal to through [4]) without considering the species caused the
the initial value. convection term in E q . [3], and the species equation,
Although microscopically the solute will be rejected E q . [5], will be used to substitute into E q . [12]. For
from the solidifying dendrites o r solid grains into the convenience, the above equation is integrated to obtain
interdendritic liquid, there is no mechanism to transport the following form:
the solute; hence, the average solute concentration (i.e.,
from the macroscopic point o f view) should remain the [ _ ( l - k p ~ gt(l+V'_VeT)-Idg,]
same as the initial value. Figure 10 shows the calculation f f = ~ ° exp L \l-fl/f~ g,J [13]
result from the mathematical m o d e l proposed in the pres-
ent study, which is as expected. In fact, the result shown Hence, the transient solute distribution in the casting
in Figure 10 provides an excellent opportunity to test the can be obtained by substituting the transient velocity,
correctness o f the mathematical m o d e l and its associated temperature gradients, and the rate o f temperature change
numerical technique established in the present study, at calculated from Eqs. [ t ] through [4]. Figure 11 shows
least in the limiting case. the solute distribution calculated by E q . [13] and by the
comprehensive m o d e l proposed in the present study at a
C. Comparison with the Model by Flemings time o f 100 seconds. It is seen that good agreements
and Nereo between these two methods are obtained. The small dif-
For comparison, the "local solute redistribution equa- ference could be caused by the neglecting o f solute dif-
tion" derived by Flemings and Nereo [s] is rewritten in fusion and the decoupling o f the species equation from
the following: the momentum and energy equations in E q . [13].

9 7 0 - - V O L U M E 24A, A P R I L 1993 METALLURGICAL T R A N S A C T I O N S A


4.75 . . . . I . . . . I . . . . I " 5.25 . . . . I . . . . I . . . . I . . . .

fo~ = 4.6% :
T i m e = 100 sec
Present w o r k
5.00 .... Calculated, Flemings & Nereo(7)-
4.50 - - Present model
• Measured, Flemings & N e r e o(z)
.... F l e m i n g s ' equation (s}

t-
O
8 4.75

~e-- 4.25 e-
IlJ
t-
O 8c 4.50
.m fo*X= 4.1% :
t\~,~ - - - Present w o r k
"5 . . . . . Calculated, Kato &Cahoon(B)
~ 4.00 "6
~
425I [ . . ~ .

"
.
Measured' Kat° & Cah°°n(B)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3.75
0.0
. . . . I
2.5
. . . . i
5.0
. . . . i
7.5
. . . .
10.0
400 / i i...... / i , i / ....... , 7 ....
0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0
D i s t a n c e f r o m Chill (cm)
Distance from Chill (cm)
Fig. 11--Comparison between the present s t u d y and the results ob- Fig. 12--Calculated results and experimental data for the solutedis-
tained from the "local solute redistribution equation" b y Flemings tributions in the completely solidified castings.
and Nereo[5] at t = 100 s.

4.75
D. Final Solute Distribution in the Solidified Casting ' ' ' ' I ' ' ' ' I ' ' ' ' I ' '

The final solute distribution after the casting is com-


pletely solidified is g i v e n in Figure 12. It is noted that - - he = 0.02 W c m ' 2 K q, T i m e = 210 sec

only the solidified portion of the casting near the chill .... he = 0.06 W c m ' 2 K"1, T i m e = 4 0 sec

~
4.50
is plotted in the figure, and still a negative-segregated ----.hc=0.18Wcm'2K "1, T i m e = 1 0 s e c
mushy zone exists at a distance further away from the
chill. The experimental data and the calculated results of 8
Flemings and Nereo m for 4.6 pct initial copper concen-
tration and the results of Kato and Cahoon[8] for 4.1 pct
initial copper concentration are also shown in the figure.
It is seen that excellent agreements between the predic-
~ 4.25

tions of the present study and the results of previous studies


8
are obtained. It is noted that the previous theoretical pre-
dictions are based on much simpler and restricted models,
and they do not show the transient phenomena as the
~ 4.00i ",I', ,1" ' ~ _ / /
\./',,,
present m o d e l does. From Figure 12, it can be concluded
that the mathematical m o d e l and its associated numerical
technique established by the present study are appropri-
3.75 , , , , I , . I , , , I
ate. As the solid-phasevelocity is assumed t o be zero in
0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0
the present s t u d y , it can also be said that under the uni-
directional solidification cooled from the bottom, the as- D i s t a n c e f r o m Chill ( c m )
sumption of a stationary solid phase is acceptable. Fig. 1 3 - - E f f e c t of heat-extraction r a t e at the b o t t o m o n the i n v e r s e
segregation.
E. Effect o f Heat Extraction Rate on
Inverse Segregation
The effect of the heat extraction rate on the formation decreased. In other words, less solute can be carried by
of inverse segregation can be studied by varying the con- the fluid flow in the smaller mushy zone t o pile up near
the chill.
vective heat-transfer coefficient between the chill and the
casting. Figure 13 shows the inverse segregation for three
different heat-transfer coefficients. It is seen that a higher
heat-transfer coefficient increases the solidification rate
V. CONCLUSIONS
and decreases the severity of inverse segregation. This
is because a higher solidification rate decreases the size A numerical simulation of the formation of macro-
of the mushy zone, and the time required for solute-rich segregation has been conducted for a unidirectional so-
liquid in the mushy zone t o flow "against" the chill is lidification of aluminum-copper alloys cooled from the

METALLURGICAL TRANSACTIONS A VOLUME 24A, APRIL 1993--971


bottom. The mathematical model, based on the contin- rate o f temperature change
uum formulation, allows a complete coupling between /x dynamic viscosity
the momentum, energy, and species equations and a P density
simple treatment o f the casting d o m a i n , including the
solid phase, mushy zone, and liquid phase. Natural con-
vection due to temperature and solute gradients and Subscripts
shrinkage-induced fluid flow are considered in the pres-
ent model. Transient temperature, velocity, and species 0 initial value
distributions in the solidifying casting are calculated. The c chill
results from the present study indicate that the mathe- e eutectic
matical m o d e l and its associated numerical technique es- l liquid phase
tablished in the present study can accurately predict the m fusion
formation o f inverse segregation. The major conclusions r relative to solid velocity
can be summarized as follows: s solid phase
1. A positive segregation o f species in the casting near
the chill (inverse segregation) is predicted. This seg-
regation is accompanied by a moving and negative- Superscript
segregated mushy zone. a constituent o f alloy
2. The formation o f inverse segregation and negative-
segregated mushy zone is caused by the fluid flow o f
solute-rich liquid in the mushy zone due to solidifi-
cation contraction. The effect o f shrinkage-induced ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
flow on the solute redistribution in the mushy zone
is much more significant than the solute diffusion The authors are grateful for the partial support by the
mechanism. Air F o r c e Office o f Scientific Research under Contract
3. A higher heat-extraction rate at the bottom o f the No. F49620-88-C-0053/SB5881-0378.
casting increases the solidification r a t e , decreasing
the size o f the mushy z o n e , and lessens the severity
o f inverse segregation.
4. The predicted inverse segregation compared favor- REFERENCES
ably with the published experimental data and the
1. M.C. Flemings: Solidification Processing, McGraw-Hill, I n c . , New
previous theoretical results using much simpler and
Y o r k , NY, 1974, p p . 2 1 4 - 5 8 .
restricted models. 2. K . M . Fisher: PCH, PhysicoChem. Hydrodyn., 1981, vol. 2,
pp. 311-26.
3. E. Scheil: Metallforschung, 1947, vol. 2 , pp. 6 9 - 7 5 .
NOMENCLATURE 4. J.S. Kirkaldy and W.V. Youdelis: Trans. TMS-A1ME, 1958,
vol. 212, pp. 8 3 3 - 4 0 .
C specific heat 5. M.C. Flemings and G.E. Nereo: Trans. TMS-A1ME, 1967,
C coefficient, defined in E q . [9] vol. 239, pp. 1449-61.
Cl permeability coefficient, defined in E q . [8] 6. M.C. Flemings, R. Mehrabian, and G.E. Nereo: Trans. TMS-
d dendrite arm spacing AIME, 1 9 6 8 , vol. 2 4 2 , pp. 4 1 - 4 9 .
7. M.C. Flemings and G.E. Nereo: Trans. TMS-AIME, 1968,
D mass-diffusion coefficient
vol. 242, pp. 5 0 - 5 5 .
f mass fraction 8. H. Kato and J.R. C a h o o n : Metall. Trans. A, 1 9 8 5 , vol. 16A,
g volume fraction o r gravitational acceleration pp. 5 7 9 - 8 7 .
h enthalpy 9. I. Ohnaka and M . Matsumoto: Tetsu-to-Hagand (J. Iron Steel
H latent heat Inst. Jpn.), 1 9 8 7 , vol. 7 3 , pp. 1698-1705.
10. I. Ohnaka and M . Matsumoto: Trans. Iron Steel Inst. Jpn., 1986,
k thermal conductivity vol. 2 6 , pp. 7 8 1 - 8 9 .
k~ equilibrium partition ratio 11. W.D. Bennon and F.P. Incropera: Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer,
K permeability 1987, vol. 30, pp. 2161-70.
pressure 12. W.D. Bennon and F.P. Incropera: Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer,
P 1987, vol. 30, pp. 2 1 7 1 - 8 7 .
t time 13. C. Beckermann and R. Viskanta: PCH, PhysicoChem. Hydrodyn.,
T temperature 1 9 8 8 , vol. 10, pp. 195-213.
rm fusion temperature at zero solute 14. D.G. Neilson and F.P. Incropera: lnt. J. Heat Mass Transfer,
concentration 1 9 9 1 , vol. 34, pp. 1717-32.
u velocity in the x-direction 15. K.C. C h i a n g and H.L. Tsai: Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 1992,
vol. 35, pp. 1763-70.
v velocity in the y-direction 16. K.C. C h i a n g and H.L. Tsai: Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 1992,
V velocity vector vol. 35, pp. 1771-78.
v~ relative velocity vector (V~ - Vs) 17. P.C. Carman: Trans. Inst. Chem. Eng., 1937, vol. 15, pp. 150-66.
X, y Cartesian coordinates 18. K. Kubo and R.D. Pehlke: Metall. Trans. B , 1985, vol. 16B,
pp. 359-66.
19. G.S. Beavers and E.M. Sparrow: J . Appl. Mech., 1 9 6 9 , vol. 36,
Greek Symbols pp. 711-14.
20. J. N i and C. Beckermann: Transport Phenomena in Material
fls solutal expansion coefficient Processing, M. C h a r m i c h i , M.K. C h y u , Y. J o s h i , and S.M.
fir thermal expansion coefficient Walsh, e d s . , A S M E HTD, Fairfield, NJ, 1990, vol. 32, pp. 45-56.

972--VOLUME 24A, APRIL 1993 METALLURGICAL TRANSACTIONS A


2 1 . S.V. Patankar: Numerical Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow, 2 3 . R.D. Pehlke, A. Jeyarajan, and H. Wada: Summary o f Thermal
Hemisphere. New York, NY, 1 9 8 0 , p p . 96-102. Properties f o r Casting Alloys and Mold Materials, Report N o .
2 2 . K.C. Chiang: Ph.D. Thesis, University of Missouri-Rolla, Rolla, PB83-211003, National Technical Information Service,
MO, 1990. Washington, DC, 1 9 8 3 , p p . 81-93.

METALLURGICAL TRANSACTIONS A VOLUME 24A, APRIL 1993--973

You might also like