Professional Documents
Culture Documents
With respect to proof of written laws, parol proof is objectionable, for the
written law itself is the best evidence. According to the weight of authority, when
a foreign statute is involved, the best evidence rule requires that it be proved by a
duly authenticated copy of the statute. (Wildvalley Shipping Co., Ltd. v. Court
of Appeals, G.R. No. 119602, [October 6, 2000
Answer: Yes. The Philippines is the situs of the tort complained of and the place
"having the most interest in the problem", we find, by way of recapitulation, that
the Philippine law on tort liability should have paramount application to and
control in the resolution of the legal issues arising out of this case. Further, we
hold that the respondent Regional Trial Court has jurisdiction over the parties and
the subject matter of the complaint; the appropriate venue is in Quezon City,
which could properly apply Philippine law. Moreover, we find untenable
petitioner's insistence that "[s]ince private respondent instituted this suit, she has
the burden of pleading and proving the applicable Saudi law on the matter." As
aptly said by private respondent, she has "no obligation to plead and prove the
law of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia since her cause of action is based on Articles
19 and 21" of the Civil Code of the Philippines. In her Amended Complaint and
subsequent pleadings, she never alleged that Saudi Law should govern this
case. And as correctly held by the respondent appellate court, "considering that
it was the petitioner who was invoking the applicability of the law of Saudi Arabia,
then the burden was on it [petitioner] to plead and to establish what the law of
Saudi Arabia is"||| (Saudi Arabian Airlines v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No.
122191, [October 8, 1998], 358 PHIL 105-129)
8. If the issue is substantive, the court may apply foreign law or forum law. If
issue is procedural, court will apply forum law. Reason: so as not to unduly
burden or complicate the task of the court with the study of uncommon
peculiarities and refinements of another legal system.
2
i. No person shall be without a domicile.
ii. A person cannot have two simultaneous domiciles since the very
purpose for identifying one’s domicile is to establish a connection
between the person and the definite legal system.
11. Kilberg doctrine - it is a rule to the effect that the forum is not bound by
the law of the place of injury or death as to the limitation on damages for wrongful
act because such rule is procedural and hence the law of the forum governs this
issue.
13. Long arm statutes - statutes allowing the courts to exercise jurisdiction
when there are minimum contacts between the non-resident and defendant and
the forum
14. Borrowing statute – laws of the state or jurisdiction used by another state
in deciding conflicts question involved in the choice of law.
i. It is for each State to determine who are its nationals. The law
shall be recognized by other States insofar as it is consistent
with international convention, customs, and principles of law
generally recognized with regard to nationality.
ii. Any question as to whether a person possesses the nationality
of a particular State shall be determined in accordance with the
law of that State.