Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Mechanism
The nature of the piezoelectric effect is closely related to the occurrence of
electric dipole moments in solids. The latter may either be induced for ions on
crystal lattice sites with asymmetric charge surroundings (as in BaTiO3 and PZTs)
or may directly be carried by molecular groups (as in cane sugar). The dipole
density or polarization (dimensionality [C·m/m3] ) may easily be calculated for
crystals by summing up the dipole moments per volume of the crystallographic
unit cell. As every dipole is a vector, the dipole density P is a vector field. Dipoles
near each other tend to be aligned in regions called Weiss domains. The domains
are usually randomly oriented, but can be aligned using the process of poling (not
the same as magnetic poling), a process by which a strong electric field is applied
across the material, usually at elevated temperatures. Not all piezoelectric
materials can be poled.
Piezoelectric materials also show the opposite effect, called the converse
piezoelectric effect, where the application of an electrical field creates mechanical
deformation in the crystal.
The first demonstration of the direct piezoelectric effect was in 1880 by the
brothers Pierre Curie and Jacques Curie. They combined their knowledge of
pyroelectricity with their understanding of the underlying crystal structures that
gave rise to pyroelectricity to predict crystal behavior, and demonstrated the
effect using crystals of tourmaline, quartz, topaz, cane sugar, and Rochelle salt
(sodium potassium tartrate tetrahydrate). Quartz and Rochelle salt exhibited the
most piezoelectricity.
The Curies, however, did not predict the converse piezoelectric effect. The
converse effect was mathematically deduced from fundamental thermodynamic
principles by Gabriel Lippmann in 1881.The Curies immediately confirmed the
existence of the converse effect, and went on to obtain quantitative proof of the
complete reversibility of electro-elasto-mechanical deformations in piezoelectric
crystals.
For the next few decades, piezoelectricity remained something of a laboratory
curiosity. More work was done to explore and define the crystal structures that
exhibited piezoelectricity. This culminated in 1910 with the publication of
Woldemar Voigt's Lehrbuch der Kristallphysik (Textbook on Crystal Physics),which
described the 20 natural crystal classes capable of piezoelectricity, and rigorously
defined the piezoelectric constants using tensor analysis.
Crystal classes
Of the 32 crystal classes, 21 are non-centrosymmetric (not having a centre of
symmetry), and of these, 20 exhibit direct piezoelectricity[19] (the 21st is the
cubic class 432). Ten of these represent the polar crystal classes,[20] which show a
spontaneous polarization without mechanical stress due to a non-vanishing
electric dipole moment associated with their unit cell, and which exhibit
pyroelectricity. If the dipole moment can be reversed by applying an external
electric field, the material is said to be ferroelectric.
Piezoelectric crystal classes: 1, 2, m, 222, mm2, 4, 4, 422, 4mm, 42m, 3, 32, 3m, 6,
6, 622, 6mm, 62m, 23, 43m.
For polar crystals, for which P ≠ 0 holds without applying a mechanical load, the
piezoelectric effect manifests itself by changing the magnitude or the direction of
P or both.
For the nonpolar but piezoelectric crystals, on the other hand, a polarization P
different from zero is only elicited by applying a mechanical load. For them the
stress can be imagined to transform the material from a nonpolar crystal class (P =
0) to a polar one,[13] having P ≠ 0.
Materials
Many materials, both natural and synthetic, exhibit piezoelectricity:
Quartz
Berlinite (AlPO4), a rare phosphate mineral that is structurally identical to
quartz
Sucrose (table sugar)
Rochelle salt
Topaz
Tourmaline-group mineral
Lead titanate (PbTiO3).
Tendon
Silk
Wood due to piezoelectric texture
Enamel
Dentin
DNA
Application
Currently, industrial and manufacturing is the largest application market for
piezoelectric devices, followed by the automotive industry. Strong demand also
comes from medical instruments as well as information and telecommunications.
The global demand for piezoelectric devices was valued at approximately US$14.8
billion in 2010. The largest material group for piezoelectric devices is
piezoceramics, and piezopolymer is experiencing the fastest growth due to its low
weight and small size.