Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/309205312
Evaluation on X-Plane Simulator Using Flight Test Data of Light Aircraft KLA-
100 Scaled Model
CITATIONS READS
0 313
6 authors, including:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Feasibility of a 3D Printed Patient-Specific Model System to Determine Hemodynamic Energy Delivery During Extracorporeal Circulation View project
Uncertainty Aerospace Design Optimization Using Advanced Variable Complexity Modeling Method View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Nhu Van Nguyen on 18 October 2016.
LV Thang Nguyen1*, Wai Nwe Tun1, Nhu Van Nguyen1, Maxim Tyan1, Sangho Kim1, Jae-Woo Lee1
1
Department of Aerospace Information Engineering, Konkuk University, Seoul, Korea
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Key Words: Flight simulation, X-plane, Flight test data
1. Introduction
Nowadays, flight simulation plays a significant role Table 1 presents the aircraft components with
in aerospace science researches from design specification and modelling methods in Plane Maker
development to certification stage and pilot training [1] [4].
[2]. Therefore, the accuracy of flight simulator is Table 1: Aircraft components and modelling method
extremely important to ensure that the simulator is able Components Modelling method
Fuselage Into cross-sections, frontal drag
to reproduce the real flight path.
Wing and 2D Airfoil section
X-plane is a simple flight simulator, which allows empennage Control surfaces dimensions
users to model and simulate various types of flight Landing gear Location, steering, cycles
vehicles including fixed-wing, rotorcraft, UAV or tilting Reciprocating engine DLEG0031
Propulsion Output: 3.7hp/8500 rpm
systems. Currently, X-plane can also be used as an system Propeller: 18x10
engineering tool to predict the flying qualities of flight MTOW: 6.9457 kg
Mass and
vehicles [3]. balance CG = [16.5,37.6]%MAC
-1-
한국항공우주학회 2016 춘계학술대회 논문집 KSAS 2016 Fall Conference
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by a grant
1615001723 from Light Aircraft Development Program
funded by Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime
airs of Korean government.
In figure 4, the aircraft simulation response is [1] R. Khaki, "Dynamic flight simulation of aircraft
compared with recorded real flight test data. It can be and its comparison to flight tests," 2015.
observed that the longitudinal motion of simulated [2] S. Y. Ong, "Aircraft 6 DOF model validation
through flight test," 1998.
aircraft performs good accuracy compared with flight
test responses. However, the lateral and directional [3] http://www.x-plane.com. [Online].
motion shows higher discrepancy with the test data. [4] L. s. a. project, "The KLA-100 RC spin test and
W/T test," 2015.3.
5. Conclusions and Future Work
[5] A. Dorobantu, "Validating uncertain aircraft
X-plane simulator shows good accuracy in
simulation model using flight test data," 2013.
longitudinal flight. However, it is so far inaccurate in
other maneuvers due to some limitations:
- Moments of Inertia cannot be specified explicitly
- Possible poor drag estimation inside the
-2-