.   
  ...

:  

! " #$ %& #' %(
) *
+  ,
 *- 
 . 
'
.*/0 123 
 

! 4/ 5
' # *'
 *06 78 
+ *0)  *9 . :
'
! ;' *9 
 
+ #'
 < *06 5
0 => 5
3
+? #-

@ 
,' /
 < 0  ;0) > #'  :
' #' *0)

&,
 *
+  + * #A */@

 B&' , #$ . ' 

!? C
! " *' * B&' - ;>  #'
&< # *0)

! 5
!3
+? 4' D 
 
3
6 
 
6? *'> 
6 
*!06 %(
!) *9  # #'
 
6
E / *
 C6 C@ %96 *0
5
! I!0 5
!6? B(
!' . => *
&' #@ (*
+ G *$ G *')
 #!3 */0 *" 5 # *(
&' B(
' J96
&96   # 
?
! =! !+ $
!3K  
&@ &)
& , # *
+  *0) 
.#' &+ /0 *+ #> < *' *
+

: 
*M L'
 – *
+ L'
 – *' L'
 – *0) – *
+ 

1
$ % & – # –  ! " –    – 
    
 .

$ % & – # (  ! " –    – 
 '     .
2


 : 

5?
! #!@ "  #> '
'0 *090 
 
+ *0)  *9 5N-
.
 O *+ *3A
 #'
  &0 C
5
+


&,
 5
>? '  #@ &A
,' A #3 *0) 5'
 $
! @A "' #> 2  
+ P@
&

3"
3 & *'
'$ *

! %
-? " 32 5?
 
&@96 78 
 =N +
.*&
 P@
&@,   * *3 *
 123 *3
 < 5
3
+? 
  K

.*0' 
+  >
0 #3 C
 O 
 3 Q
,'
& *- 78

: 
! !+ *!+

 " 
  #$ *+
 #@ *-  
*!0) S *>'
&,
 *+ ;0) %96 #> 
 R
' #@ *06 *
+
.
&< #

:   
C+ *
+   #'
&< # *0)  *9
 " #$ . %&
#'
! #@ *
+  123   + *+ *>'  T" #
  
+$ ;
.*06 %(
) 52

:   !"
*!>+ + *+ *>' #'
&< # *0) 4'  *9> + . =0
*!0) #!> %
 
 J6-
$  + 
 3 ; *
+  
&2
2! D 2& < *- T9  *>+
, > #+
6 ;- +  #'
: #
 =@? . D/
*
+ * *0)    D
&0(
) %96 #> #'
 #@ *
+  %6"
."
3K  
& &) #

)
 : &! ' ' : $# %
*0'
 ;,
 #@
E / "  C" 3 3 
+ *3
  #@ E 78 506
!&@ #

 C(
0 *  *+Q
  
+  ,9@   #0@ G ;> 
 *!0' S2 #>   N
' + 7L-  Kant 5'
   0' #@ 4
,'
;@  2 5 0' #@ *,' 3  *> C 6 N
M S2  C(
@
! #!$ ;!@ )'' 2 3 
@   : >' #$ 
+  +' #Q
#! !0 #@ #'& %6Q) %(
)  ;  

''
32 #$    J
6
7
' 
+ - + 
+  ;< 7#- 7
+ 
 ;@ ' 2 &@ 
 (9
E 

+ 
 3 = -     %96
E  6A  23 #@   G

0 
"6
 3 " %& #$ " #@ 
+' 3 
+ 
   
#!> Q! ? 
+"   ,9@ 1W
 #> O D 
+ *>/ 
+ *2
.(XZ J G XY 50  C) "C

& 5- # C0 #@ 
&2  #@ C

 *! S$ !3  # S$ +  
+

M"  Santiana
'
'
 2

!+ %! !'> (XZ J G XX !    *,>) "*
+ *? %
-
 ;!Q$  7Q+ *@
/$  ? . 7Q+A  
+'" ;'O ;@ #  +' 

5!0  C) "
E+ #' "
'>  
@ 3 " C7
$ ;@ 5'
 ?$ 1N
! *!9>  !> C! C"" ;' @ Cliff Bill  %
 .( X[ J G XY
!' ;> .( [G] J –XX *  C) "
&2  #@ 
+A A ,,6
: - #$ 
  #@ 5

+
.- 5
'  5
9> > *+
' #3 : *- 5

+ G
/ 
 C@ 
 
 "'>    , # #3 : *Q 5

+ G
.

&> %
 J(
"6  *>+ #$ *
+  
 D+ @ % 3

G Q!? G C! :#!3 1!' ;>  
 
+  *- C>
 
+M
G *"!6- D
, G 
 
)'
 G 4
M G 
' ' G 
 '
+
.*- 5

+ #' #3  4' –  *,
 *+

*
 :   : # ()
#!> !O !+ ;!' ' 
&3  *0) #'
E - , 
+  ' ?
5
! C
!> + #> O  " ? #&@ *0) &0 *- ;' C/

"!? !"
'> *' 5
, *K0 5
9 *& C7
/M 5
+
 *
*0' *+ _ *'
'M 5
+
? *@
 -
3  @ ^$ ... & *
 
+'
&'> #'K ? *
 C/ T" 
 )' 2& L3 G *>
+ *@

. 


:  
     : # ))
(Venturi – 1987) C
 #@ =
'  ;
 #@ Robert Venturi '@ 5 2
;'P@ *'
 D
& 6A #>
3$ *0) -   *  
+' ' 
''$"
#!> *0) 
0 % 7
+  #@ " 6A #>
&'  
> 3
+
' 

&
!- !> .! %(
!)   C
 #3
&0' >    C"
&'
,! `! 
!-A %(
) *6 5
+
?  #+
6 &) #3 
-A
.Sullivan (1949) "B' RQ 6

# )' *&+ > D@ 

&'  +'@
'> T *0) > #'  *
-$ ) 
#' *0) *" T9 
@ " 2 . ;0) > #'  C/ 
#0) 
 
,M #' *'32 C"   + ;' 
'M 46' ? # ,
Q'! ! !68 !'
+ #> .( Xb J G XXa    
) "#K0
";- #' *0)  C-
 *9> +  A  #@ C/
 " ;' Simmens
.(Y[ J GXXY  ")
!> *>
0'?
&/KO C
 Q 2 1 3 #0) 0 
+  '
'3 
;!'> !>
 3 .( ZG] J – Xcc 
@>  #
) 5'  
 6A '0
# *
 *0) ?$ 3
 
 "  
' 6W - #+
+ 5@
#!' -! *0,
> *0)  *( Q - *0' *0) #$
& 
!>
0 *!
 *" 3 -"  .(a[ J G 5@  #+
+) "*
 *

+
*!0
3"
' ; C"
 *'
 *&+  C0  #>
+ ,  
 #+
( J G XX] G     
&-) ." 6 *&+  *"
6 *2 *

*!
+ ! !+ *+ *>'  ;'
  #$ *
 *+
 T/
'3
!'+
! *" %  23
&< # *0)

&,
 
  #@ *06
 Groat (1988) 52 .  d
 
+ *, L &0 "  9(
 *
+
L!@ 5
!    3 * 4/ *( *
 J(
"6  L@ * 
K
.! 
!+
 *

$ &@ C/ 
&3 D' L  *( 5

+ *
,
.
' *
> ;/0
 C/
 3  
 ;/0
  5
 5'

: .! *" ' + *+   ,-( : # !

5?
+ 3  3 #'
 #+
6 &)"  
 > 5
' #'  

 
 5
&+ *+
 - 23  5
&+ *+
 - 5
> #@ *
A 
3?

! > –  #') *>
0'? 5
, *
 5 %) ? 96
.(bc J G XXc– 5
'
 S2!  
!+
! (
 
$ C/ L C6A *'A L@ 
 ;'  
*!' *!(  (
 C "  *> *, 
+ * ,- ;3
+ 
@A
*(   *06 C

 
  (
 6O   5
 6P L0"
&/
.68 A L@ C O,6 5?
$  -
 9
%!  5
-M  *@K0 "  *>+ => L>  
A 123 
*"
6 
 6P Sanoff, (1970)  Zube et. al, (1975) ;'/0
 
' @  L>
Image L
  * 4/ *( * " 
6$   .Rating Scales L

=! d
' .  * B(
'  *'
$ L@ < L *
& 5
>/  sampling
L!> ? %
! !6A =! d
'  L@ *( * *'> 
6$ C/ 

.J(
"6 123 L@ D' L>  *'> 
6$  *( L@ C< J(
"6
Multiple sorting L 3  6W  Bishop (1983)
/  Groat (1982) 6$  

L!@ "! ! . 5

>+ L "  *>+  (  , ;@ 

,

!
! d6A 5
>+ L@ " > *6 
 - *&
- C *>+
23 .(
/ 1  6 
 
6P     .;0' (
3
L'
! S2  *(  L@
'
& L *06 
 L> % L@ 0 A
.
& *
"
,  L' *&+ " ( * => L>   L O+ @ Sanoff (1974)

d2!  Semantic differential scale L!
 6P 5
&+  3
- 
: , L@ 5
+ 6
&' C
/ 5
0"  *(
 L> 
* GGG GGG GGG GGG GGG *+
C GGG GGG GGG GGG GGG *,
L!@ *-! @ *' *
+ J(
"6 O *@ 3 , 
 2$
 *
 L@


   .*>' J(
"6 "A L@ L3 L J(
"6 12& L>/ L
 *"
L"!6-   5
&+ *>/ 
 =  *9 * Krampen (1980)
. 
+ 23 L@ *@
/$ Elsheshtawy (1997)
& 
 L *  
+ 23 L@  .
&
L> 
>$ C- *( L@ complexity  *
 C  L>/  , 

.LK0 )' 5
-+ 5
)'

: .! 0"  

 1
 2!3
 ,( : /
: . 4/ *- # B&' *8 5,6 D/  
.
3 . 4/ *- #> % G
.. * =0 D/ G
.=0 *" 
 
' #+  
6 Ga
.
M 7+$ G]
.B(
' " G[
.5
)'  =0 7/ #@ : B(
' 0 Gc

-
! *!, K *, *
+ 5
 # . *
3 * 7
"M T" 
*!
+ 3)
! *! 5! 5N  5
9
30 
A *? .
*!' 
6 7
"M *,  . .(a] J – #'0  ) "
+ > 59-
!> !
 .# ??
&96   #
3>
&>' .  . *
'
5
!'
 =!> S2!  N  ;>  *9> + *@ *(
"M
,
,
5?? ! ;!> !,'
 
A 7
 *'
 5
  + C" #@ B(
'
.
&"  * */0 < * B(
' #$ "  #'

*M  *
+  *' %(
)  *0)  *@K@ C"  > 
6   
"! ! C *>+  "   23 
6$    .C" ac > L
+P
S2 *06 *
 5
3
+M  5
>+ L " Q@    .C" c 5N
5
!3
+? .! ! 4'
&@ @  " 
6 '> #>   *
+  C,
C
! " L@ L>   .C
6 5
'
 *
+  + *+ S2  *

:
3 
 < > *
+M
&@ , Q Q
+M 
?

E Q
'
E C #> *0) *>+  */ "  *' @  , GI
.?
E
+ A #$ +A 
G 4
!M G C! G: #!3 *0)  *06 *
+  + *+  , GII
 *,
 G 4' G 
/ 
 G 
' *' G '
+ 
+'? G Q?
.
!'+ . ;(9  #(- 
6?   . * *'> 
6   
*!@
 %!/ ! .!

,' > *+
6 
A */ 5

+$  7W #> "
#@ *, 
 &0 >  *
  *
+  #@ *(,
6 3
0 C
  *

*
  4' C
> D ( 
 ]Z) 
  *' 56 S2 
?
.R6 2' 5' >  *'
&$ #' #
L!@ *!06 *
+  + *+ L> % 5
+ *6 
 6   
:L
 + L@ */ 5
+ 123  *06 %(
) 52 L'
 * "

.
 0G20 % E+ %/ + Z
21G40 % %/ 
41G60 % ,
61G80 %  a
81G100 % E+  ]
  #(
"M 
 J
6 (SPSS) B
' #$ 
?
 *"
6 B(
' I0    23
*!0)  5
9 J96 #$ " *'
 5
 B(
'   ;96  d2
.; *
+  + *+ *>' #'

: ( /! ,43(

: 3 4  0"  
 3 ! 5%
 Analysis of Variance (Anova) O % #(
"M   6$ 
*!>+ L!@ *06 *
+  + *+ 3 J"6 *' @ 5

+
*!+ 5
,! L@
0 5'
 2$
 L> % =N &> 5/> L "
B(
!' L "     ?  *(
"$ *? 52 *06 %(
) *
+  +
:  -
 */  *


3.0

2.8 2.8

2.6 2.6

2.4 2.4

2.2 2.2

FUNCTION
2.0 2.0
Mean VALUE

residential

1.8 1.8
commercial

1.6 1.6 office

unity variety balance proportion rhythm harmony contrast complexity

variable
"
,  "-  "#. /0! 1 "23 ! "# $ #% &'( "&
)*'+   

/
 *9 4'A  A L3 *
+ L'
  *+  L(
"M   + .
+ .  4'A  L3 *' L'
  +
'  *M L'

& L'

L'
 (,[b) L'
  *9 4'A 5
&+  ,  *(
"$ *? 2

@
 *+ L@

@   .*' L'
 ( , Z)  *M L'
 (,YX) *
+

!&> ?!M ! L  L'

  *9 4'A 5
&+ 
0 d 3
L'
 ] /@O *"
6 5

+A  9 d *+' L> "    .
(
"$
.L'
  *9 4'A  4'   ,@

3.5

3.0

2.5

2.0

1.5
Mean VALUE

1.0

.5
unity variety balance proportion rhythm harmony contrast complexity

"
,  "-  "#. /0 3 78'9 56 1 "23 ! "# $ #% &'( "&
)*'+ 4  
variable

.! *'  *? #'

 #@
&'> *
+ #'
 #@ C * + *+  .
 ( ,] ) *
+ L'
 L@ C + *+ ,  *(
"$ *? 2

@ +
 23 .( ,cb) *' L'
 L@ ,   ( ,b[) *M L'
 L@ , 
  .*(
"$ *? ;  *A  *' L'
 + , 

0  + 
4!'   ,@ L'
 ] /@O *"
6 5

+A  *+' 123 *"  O 
.L'
  *9 4'A 

0
.!  *A  *' L'
 L@
&'> *
+ #'
 #@ 
+'? + *+  .a
 (,YX) *
+ L'
 L@ 
+'M + *+ ,  *(
"$ *? 2

@ +
*(
"$ *? 2

@ L>    23 .( , Z) *'  ( , ) *A L'
 
5

+!A ! *!+' 12!3 *"  O    .*M  *' L'
 
.L'
  *9 4'A  4'   ,@ L'
 ] /@O *"
6
.! *
+  *' L'
 L@
&'> *M L'
 L@ 
 + *+ Q .6
 (,Xc) *!M L'
  
 + *+ ,  *(
"$ *? 2

@ +
*? 2

@ L>    23 .(,b ) *
+  (,bY) *' L'
   
! *!+' 12!3 *!" ! O    .*
+  *' L'
  *(
"$
.L'
  *9 4'A  4'   ,@ L'
 ] /@O *"
6 5

+A
#'
! ! 4
M * + *+ L@ *(
"$ *? 2

@ L> ?A  .8
 ( ,Z[) fL- = d 4
P Q *M L'
  + . *
+  *A
L'
! ! *(
"!$ *? 2

@ L> ?M    .(,Y ) *
+ L'

4!'A  4'   ,@ L'
 ] /@O *"
6 5

+?  *'  *
+
   4
M  *+ 
& + *
+ L'
  + .  L'
  *9
.*'  *M L'
  
3.5

3.0

2.5

2.0
Mean VALUE

1.5

1.0
unity variety balance proportion rhythm harmony contrast complexity

"
, variable
"-  "#. /0! +  789 < :; 1 "23 ! "# $ #% &'( "&
)*'+ 5  

1
  *!M #'
! ! !
' * + *+ L@ *(
"$ *? 2

@ + .9
L!> ( ,X)
3"
'>  
'  *+ D *M L'
  + @ *
+
/@O *"
6 5

+?   .(,Xc) *
+ L'
 5
'  
' *+ 

& + *
+ L'
  +  L'
  *9 4'A  4'   ,@ L'
 ]
.*'  *M L'
     
'  *+
 4' *+ .  *9 L'
 4'  *(
"$ *? 2

@ L>   .:
4'A  4'   ,@ L'
 ] /@O *"
6 5

+A  + ;' ?$ .Q?
.*
+ L'
  L> 4'  *+ D *' L'
  L'
  *9

: 0( ' 3 0+  

 !)<3 !5;
3.5
Correlation ,
M 
 
3.0
B(
' "  Coefficient ®
2.5
:*

2.0
*+  L
+$ ,
$ + .
1.5
 *' R2
' *' @ /0
Mean VALUE

1.0
*!
+ ! !+ *+ 
!
!
  !
!+ !
!  *!
!'

.5
unity variety balance proportion rhythm harmony contrast complexity

4!' D 
 d ,
A
variable
/0 3 789 < :; 1 "23 ! "# $ #% &'( "&
)*'+ =  
."#. 78 . A# B "C%+ (
 ?'3) "#. (r= 0.43) 4
M ; (r= 0.45)
! !  .(r= 0.42) 
/ 
3.5

Stepwise L(
"!!M !!
3.0

!!!0' Regression Analysis

2.5

4
A  4'   L3  *+'
2.0

L> *
+  3 L3 
/ 
1.5
Mean VALUE

/!0 *!+ #> O 

1.0

.5
unity variety balance proportion rhythm harmony contrast complexity
*'! #'
 * *'> @
variable
789 < :; 1 "23 ! "# $ #% &'( "&
)*'+ <  
.(R2=0.24)
."- 78 . A# B "C%+ (
 ?'3) "- /0 3


 *!+ !  *
+ R2
' *' @ /0 *+  %/ L
+$ ,
$ + .
!@ .*' L'

&'  %/ ,
M 59
  ?$ .*'
 *
+  +
(r= 0.2) 
'  (r= 0.2) 4'   /0 *+  L
+$ ,
$ S
'3  +
Stepwise L(
"M  6P  .(r= 0.19) 4
M  (r= 0.19) Q?
& 
 L> *
+  3
3 QM  4'   + @ Regression Analysis
*0!/ *!9  ?$ *!
+ #'
! *! *'> @ /0 *+ #> O
.(R2=0.05)
+ *+   *M R2
' *' @ /0 *+  %/ L
+$ ,
$ + .a
59
! /@  +   .*  ? ,
M 59
  ?$ .*'
 *
+ 

!&  (r= 0.24) 
+!'M  (r= 0.25) 4'   /0 *+  L3 ,
M

3.5
 (r= 0.23) 
/!!
 .(r= 0.22) !
'
3.0

!!! 6!!!P

2.5

Stepwise L(
"!M
2.0

Regression Analysis
1.5
 4'   + @
Mean VALUE

! !3
3 
+'M
1.0

! L!> *

+
.5
unity variety balance proportion rhythm harmony contrast complexity

variable
/0 3 789 < :; 1 "23 ! "# $ #% &'( "&
)*'+ 6   /0 *+ #> O
."
, 78 . A# B "C%+ (
 ?'3) "
,
*!! *!
!'> !
!@
.(R2=0.08) * 5 *9  ?$ *M #'

.L'
  *9 4'g /0 #@ S- 
 3 4'  d

)
 :  4( ,43(
5!,6 L R
 C,6 L3  " L@ L'
 5

+ &@ 1
+$ L@ C,6 * 123 
L' *0) &$ d S2   5

+ *

M / &0 " d6
5!' d2  &/0 
' *
>
2 L> % L *@
/$ ;>  L+
6 ;- 
L! * 5"   .
 /0 
2 > %6


K ;' *
 5

:L @
3Q+' B(
'  >
 *!
+ L'
!     complexity   *+ *' L'
 Q G

!  *
+ L'
 > 
+'? Q  C
&@  *' L'
  ?$ *M
.*M L'
 >
&@ 
 
 C!  
+'M   *+ .  L'
 4'  L&@ *
+ L'

 G
.
'  4
M
Q d2  
 >
 *
+  K L@ *, + *+
& *M L'
 Ga
.*
+ L'
  A 
'  4
M  68 >' >
%96 ;
" #' %(
) %96 O * */@ *" O *
 B(
'   23
! 
& &)
& , *
+  *0)    *
+  = + *+ L@
. 
3K
/!0 *+ #> O  L> *
+  3 L3 
/  4
A  4'  G]
.*' #'
 * *'> @
*'> @ /0 *+ #> O  L> *
+  3
3 QM  4'  G[
.%/ O  ?$ *
+ #'
 *
!@ /!0 *+ #> O  L> *
+  3
3 
+'M  4'  Gc
.* 5 *9  ?$ *M #'
 * *'>
.L'
  *9 4'g /0 #@ S- 
 3 4' Gb
/!0 *!+ #!> <!
&2 *
+  = + */0 *" 5 B(
' 123
.L'
 &+

*
 =!

: ! =!
. XY  
+  5
)' – 50  C ♦
.XX  0 *
K G     *,> ♦
.XX 1 *
  *
'  #@ 5

+ – * C ♦
.XYb  C
 #@ =
'  G 5  '@ ♦
.XXa  5A C
 #@ * G   G 
 ♦
.XXY  
 "  G"  >  *+GQ'..S ♦
.Xcc  C
 #@ *0) G 
@> G #
 ♦
. 5
3 ;, 4
- G 5@  #+
+ ♦
.XX] 
&
- , *)' A
&
 C
 –     
&- ♦

! 
!A R2
' #+
6&)" ' 
– 5
' 
 > –  #' ♦
.XXc  C3
 *'3 *+ G"D
, Q #@
.XXa # .
 " – #'0   ♦

: (> =!
♦ Bishop, R (1983): The perception and importance of time in architecture. Ph.
D thesis, University of Surrey.

♦ Elsheshtawy, Y (1997): Urban complexity: Toward the measurement of the

physical complexity of street-scapes. Journal of Architectural and Planning
Research. 14:4.

♦ Groat, L (1982): Meaning in post modern architectuere. An examination using

the multiple sorting task. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 2(1): 3-22.

♦ Groat, L (1988): Contextual compatibility in architecture: an issue or personal

taste. In Environmental aesthetics. Ed. Nasar, J. Cambridge University Press.

♦ Krampen, M (1980): The correlation of objective façade measurements with

subjective ratings. Meaning and behavior in the built environment. Ed.
Broadbent, G; Bunt, R, and Llorens, T. John Wiley & Sons.

♦ Lang, J (1987): Creating architectural theory: The role of the behavioral

sciences in environmental design. Van Nostrand Reinhold.

+
♦ Nasar, J (1988): Environmental psychology: Theory, research and
applications. Cambridge University Press.

♦ Sanoff, H; (1970): House form and preference. in EDRA two: Proceedings of

the Second Annual Environmental Design Research Association Conference.

♦ Sanoff, H: (1974): Systematic evaluation of architectural requirements for

community housing. Designing the method. Ed. David Tester. North Carolina
State University. Vol. 23.

♦ Sanoff, H (1991): Visual research methods in design. Van Nostrand Reinhold.

♦ Sullivan (1949): The autobiography of an idea. New York.

♦ Zube, E; Julius, G, and Robert, O (1975): Landscape assessment. Stroudsburg,

PA: Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross.

,