Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract
Disability like any other social phenomenon is complex and socially constructed, however,
generally, impairment does not always lead to the term of disability as someone with unique
physical creature also recognized disabled by society. It has a relationship with identity in
how people with impairments assimilate their disability into their identity in various ways, as
identity is a complicated and multi-faceted thing and often experienced a dynamic change
(Martin 18). This study investigates how the identity formation of disabled people portrayed
in the musical genre movie The Greatest Showman 2017 directed by Michael Gracey. This
movie contains the issue on how disabled people construct their identity as they live within a
disable-community, shared the same experiences, oppression, and fight to gain recognition
on what society believes. The objective of this study is to show how disabled people construct
their identity in such a complex society. This research is conducted using a qualitative
descriptive method by analyzing monologues, dialogues, and the lyrics contained in Michael
Gracey’s The Greatest Showman as the analysis unit, then, the data is analyzed with content
analysis. The result highlights how disabled people gained more confident to shore up their
identity when they belong to the same community they live in, identity becomes a positive
sense of self, feelings of solidarity with the disability community. A coherent disability
identity considered as an adjustment to help individuals accepting their impairments,
including exploring daily hassles and related social anxieties.
I. Introduction
What first occurred in your mind when the word disability was pronounced?
Definitely will not be far from the word impairment or imperfection. Disability
like any other social phenomena is socially and culturally mediated. Society
defines the meaning of it, the construction of what is ‘normal’ is deeply embedded
in our thinking, as well as in the paradigms and activities of schools, hospitals and
other institutions. Onley & Kim (565) states that literature appears to consistently
frame the concept of adjustment as an acceptance/adaptation to one's limitations
rather than the adjustment to attitudes toward disability. Disability-identity is
referred to like that part of the self-concept that develops from the disability-
related self-definitions that exist within an individual. Using the identity concepts
of some theorists, this article will discuss how a disabled person in The Greatest
Showman (2017) construct and develop his/her identity in such a complex society.
The Greatest Showman is a musical drama genre that was screened in
theatres around the world in 2017. The movie was directed by Michael Gracey in
his directorial debut. Inspired by the true story of Phineas Taylor Barnum which
raised the issue of disability as the main topic (Wikipedia). As a movie based on a
true story about the 90s American circus that recruited humans with a unique
physique as performers in his show, this movie raises an interesting issue about
how disability can construct someone’s identity to study further. Apart from
because this is a musical show with songs that spoil the ears, the audience also
dissolves in the story of the touching performers. This movie winning a number of
Oscars and it contains issues that concern the public why an issue regarding
disability and its relation to one's identity in a show and getting a lot of pressure
can be a booming film. That is why I interested to raise the issue of how the
formation of identity in the characters with disability portrayed in this movie.
Disability scholar, Linton (Lellis 508) describes disability as “a linchpin in
a complex web of social ideals, institutional structures, and government policies”
– not simply a disease or injury. The cultural identity of disability is described as
being rooted in oppression and discrimination, and how the public perceives
people with disabilities and the significance of disability issues may be influenced
by media messages. Moreover, Lawson added ‘spastic’, ‘cripple’, ‘invalid’, until
‘handicapped’ as several terms that have been used to define people with
impairments. The common factor was that they belonged to the non-disabled
people characteristics (Lawson 204).
According to the American Psychiatric Association in (Onley 563), a
number of disabilities have an impact on mental and cognitive functions such as;
memory, motivation, mood, attention span, and organisation. They fall into
several broader domains including developmental, psychiatric, learning, and
neurological disorders. Based on the social paradigms nowadays which write by
Fine & Asch in (Onley 564), barriers are erected that exclude individuals who are
considered different. Someone with physical disabilities is often easier being
recognised to the class of people we call disabled. They often experience outright
discrimination, assumption and attitudes from others, that can cause a strong
influence on self-perception, causing individuals to feel guilt, anxiety, self-doubt
and ambivalence, particularly in regards to receiving some help. Research and
theory on self-perception of individuals with a disability have been largely
focused on the experience of those who have physical impairments (Onley 564).
Furthermore, Naugle defined the concept of adjustment in (Onley 565), as
‘a reordering of priorities and adjustment of the self with a renewed sense of self-
worth’. Alongside with Naugle, Livneh (Onley 565) unified theory of adaptation,
he conceptualised adjustment as a staged process. He identified five stages of
physical disability adjustments:
Initial impact; defence mobilisation; initial realisation; retaliation; reintegration.
According to this theory, an adjustment is characterised by satisfaction,
confidence, and contentment. The term adjustment infers resolution of conflicts
and the establishment of a healthy identity formation in people with disability.
In line with this concept of adjustment, Darling in Neiberding (321)
explains how adjustment linked with an adaptation experienced by people with
disability, he elaborates on the views that society holds on disability by closely
examining socio-economic status, cultural representations of disability in the
media, race and ethnicity, particularly pointing out that some cultural values
promote acceptance of disability including familism, cohesiveness and
protectiveness. As a result, individuals have managed to develop a positive
identity as a result of movement with the notion of stigma in society, others still
continue to experience stigma and unequal treatment in today’s society.
Moreover, Conroy (343) in his journal titled “Active Differences:
Disability and Identity Beyond Post-Modernism” sees a fresh view towards
identity, disability, and freak-performance that the twentieth-century death and
resurrection of the freakshow, and the contiguous development of the disability
rights movement, offer a performative stand-off between the post-modern and the
post-postmodern and that this has implications beyond disability theatre and
disability performance. Like racial minorities, individuals with physical
disabilities share their common experiences, goals, and cultural roots, as well as
the historical and political view. Their experience have to be understand and
appreciated, with encouragement, they are able to acknowledge the many unique
and positive aspects of life with a disability. Without culture and community, an
individual with physical disabilities maintains their feelings of shame and
ambivalence about disability.
Therein, the society also holds a role to make this uncomfortable insight
become familiar by nurturing disability rights movement or broadening the
disability culture to counter the negative stigma about disability available in the
majority culture. Then people with disabilities will feel empowered when they
come to see their difference as a valued part of their identities. So that, individual
with physical disabilities did not get confused and could be more proud about
their identity, asserting their political power to a majority culture while projecting
a new image of themselves as a powerful and competent human being.
Therefore, to characterize oneself as a disabled person is to assert the
adherence to the view that one's identity is that of a disabled person and not a
'person with a disability' (Lawson 203). Accordingly, to characterize oneself as a
disabled person is both a declaration of one's participation in a social group and
furthermore an acknowledgement of the externalization of disabled people which,
significantly, oppresses them through social structures, attitudes from individuals
and institutional practices. Here, it will be proposed that special community, such
as the life of disabled people as an entertainer in The Greatest Showman movie by
Michael Gracey, play a role in the formation of the identity of the disabled
member of the circus entertainment community. An analysis of issues relating to
physical impairments and social paradigms in the movie, and the capacity of the
social model of disability reconcile the concept of disability as a valid cultural
identity, will lead into an exploration of the community role in relation to disabled
people identity. How the disabled people as a homogeneous group in the movie,
shared experience within society and, whilst the nature of their impairments may
differ, the consequences of having an impairment result in a shared experience of
oppression in their life circle as an entertainer in the movie.
III. Conclusion
To sum up, this movie provides a coherent picture of how the development of the
disabled characters' identity formation from the beginning to the end of the film.
In can be concluded that all the disabled person within the movie has morbidity to
show up their self to the world at first, but after they assembly together, bounding
and share their experience with each other, also the experienced in receiving same
discriminations, made them become stronger together. The show becomes
successful and they have no shy feelings anymore at the end as they form their
identity through their disability and the help of communities they live in. The role
of capitalist like Barnum as they supervisor, shore up their identity seen in how
they become more confident, gained a social recognition as they want to. This
movie gave the explicit information of how the identity formation of all these
disabled people formed, begin with the feelings of unconfident, ashamed,
embarrassed, and all the guilty feeling changes as the time goes to a confident, a
feeling of hope and start to show their beautiful identity without the feelings of
fear anymore, they breaking boundaries of social construction who considered
disabled people as “freaks” and disgusting creatures, in the end, they have proven
they can also live a normal life without being mocked or laugh at.