Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Report of
"66/33KV Olakha Sub-Station"
By:
Cheten Tshering
Olakha Sub-Station, SMD Semtokha.
Transmission Department
Bhutan Power Corporation Limited
Thimphu.
BHUTAN POWER CORPORATION LIMITED
TRANSMISSION DEPARTMENT
SMD, SEMTOKHA
66/33 KV OLAKHA SUB-STATION
THIMPHU
I wish to extend sincere gratitude to Mr. Chandan Kamti Chatterjee, Testing Engineer, IPPL for
teaching me all the practical aspect of the 'Testing and Commissioning' works and also the
theoretical part of the same which are beyond the coverage in the books, which he explained
through his 22 years of field experience in 'Testing and Commissioning'. I am indebted for his
effort in revisiting my report and for making necessary correction and addition.
I would also like to offer sincere appreciation which is due to the staff members of SMD
Semtokha and Olakha Substation. Amongst the various persons who have helped me in this
endeavor, I would like to mention the following: Mr. Sonam Tobgay (Manager), Mr. Tandin
Gyeltshen, Mr. Sonam Norbu and Mr. LB Rai.
I gratefully acknowledge the extensive literature referred during the course of writing this report.
Last but not the least I would like to thank all those who have assisted me directly or indirectly in
coming out with this report.
Cheten Tshering
i
ABSTRACT
This primary goal of this report is to provide in a simple and more of conventional way of
conducting the testing of various switchgears and the system. This report 'Testing and
Commissioning Report of 66/33KV Olakha Sub Station' describes about the various testing that
are required to be done before commissioning of a substation. It contains in a lucid way, a
concise presentation of various technical data and parameters that were obtained while in field
testing. This report intends to serve as a history of Olakha substation in terms of its technical data
and could be used as future reference while testing however the data may vary with different
instruments used and the way it is conducted.
This report is also equipped with the practical and pictorial circuit diagram of the exact field
testing that was done while in the course of testing. Theories have been provided for every
experiment based on the practical hands on experience.
The materials presented in this report are intended to serve as a platform from where young and
enthusiastic technical people could enhance their learning and explore in the area of testing and
commissioning. However it could be used as reference by the one who already have the
experience.
I would like to solicit the readers' kind suggestions and feedback regarding the report so that I
could come up with better one in future.
ii
List of Figures
Figure 1 Experimental set up for checking the winding resistance ................................................ 3
Figure 2 Experimental set up for CT Ratio check ........................................................................ 14
Figure 3 Experimental setup for ratio test of PT and CVT........................................................... 23
Figure 4 KPV Testing of Current Transformer ............................................................................ 29
Figure 5 Surge Monitor Testing ................................................................................................... 38
Figure 6 SF6 Circuit Breaker Testing SCOT M3K Timer ............................................................ 41
Figure 7 SF6 Circuit Breaker Testing with Circuit Breaker Operational Analyzer .................... 42
Figure 8 Measurement of Transformer's winding resistance ....................................................... 49
Figure 9 Various testing on Transformer ..................................................................................... 57
Figure 10 Conditioning of Transformer Oil ................................................................................. 67
Figure 11 Winding Resistance Check of 33kv CT & PT............................................................... 79
Figure 12 Ratio Check of 33kv CT ............................................................................................... 80
Figure 13 High POT Test (CABLE HV TEST) ............................................................................. 93
Figure 14 Inverse-Time, Very-Inverse Time and Extremely-Inverse Time characteristics. ....... 100
Figure 15 Testing of IDMT Relays ............................................................................................. 101
Figure 16 System Stability Testing ............................................................................................. 114
iii
Table of Contents
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ............................................................................................................... i
ABSTRACT .................................................................................................................................... ii
iv
Winding Resistance Check of CT, PT & CVT
Checking the Winding Resistance of CT, PT & CVT
Bus PT#1 : PT on Tie Line Side
Bus PT#2 : PT on Jemina Line Side
CVT#1 : CVT on Tie Line Side
CVT#2 : CVT on Jemina Line Side
CT#1 : CT on Tie Line Side
CT#2 : CT on Transformer I Side
CT#3 : CT on Bus Coupler Side
CT#4 : CT on Jemina Line Side
CT#5 : CT on Transformer II Side
Aim :
Objectives :
1. To check the resistance of secondary winding (CT, PT and CVT) and compare
with that of name plate rating.
2. To check if there is any short circuit or leakage to ground from primary winding.
To check if there is any short circuit between primary and secondary windings.
3. To check if there is any leakage or short circuit between the secondary winding
and the earth. To check if there is any short circuit between the secondary
windings.
Instruments used :
NB: Megger uses Ohm's law V=IR. It gives DC voltage and the current which flows through the
winding resistance. The reading shown on the Megger is V/I.
Yph Bph
Rph
Earth Link
Secondary Winding Terminals
A (Primary)
N
Experimental Set up :
Multimeter
Earth
(Ohm meter)
Procedure :
NB: Since primary winding is on HV (66KV) side we need to apply high voltage i.e. 5 KV.
b. Keeping one of the Megger terminals connected to the primary, connect the other
terminal to the various secondary winding one by one. Apply 5KV by Meggering
and note down the subsequent readings.
3. Secondary insulation resistances check (Meggering).
a. Use lower rating Megger (1KV) for testing. This is because output voltage from
the secondary windings is 110V, so we cannot apply very high voltage, otherwise
the windings will get burned.
b. Connect the Megger to secondary 1- earth terminal, followed by secondary 2-
earth and secondary 3-earth terminals respectively. Apply 1 KV by Meggering
and note down the subsequent readings.
Observations :
• If there is any short circuit between the windings or earth, then the Megger will show
zero value.
• Else Megger will show some deflections indicating the insulation resistance value.
• Megger gives DC output
Results :
Bus PT#1, Tie Line PT (Incomer #1)
Date:14 /10/09, Wednesday, 3:45pm, Sunny.
R-Sl.no. OP 2373/2/7/08, Y-Sl.no. OP 2373/2/3/08, B-Sl.no. OP 2373/2/4/08
Secondary Winding Resistance (DM3540A Multimeter)
Terminal R-Phase (Ohm) Y-Phase (Ohm) B-Phase (Ohm)
1a-1n (1&2) 0.9 0.9 0.9
2a-2n (3&4) 0.9 0.9 0.9
3a-3n (5&6) 0.9 0.8 0.9
IR Value Check (Meggering), 5KV. Megger 2.5KV-5KV
Terminal R-Phase (M-Ohm) Y-Phase (M-Ohm) B-Phase (M-Ohm)
Pry-Earth 3000 3000 3000
Pry-Sec1(1a) 5000 3000 5000
Pry-Sec2(2a) 5000 5000 5000
Pry-Sec3(3a) 5000 5000 5000
Secondary IR Value check (Meggering), 1KV. Megger 1KV
Terminal R-Phase (M-Ohm) Y-Phase (M-Ohm) B-Phase (M-Ohm)
Sec1-Earth 200 200 200
Sec2-Earth 200 200 200
Sec3-Earth 200 200 200
Sec1-Sec2 (1a-2a) 200 200 200
Sec2-Sec3 (2a-3a) 200 200 200
Sec3-Sec1 (3a-1a) 200 200 200
Bus PT#2, Jemina Line Bus PT (Incomer#2)
Date:13 /10/09, Tuesday, 5:30pm, Sunset.
R-Sl.no. OP 2373/2/5/08, Y-Sl.no. OP 2373/2/6/08, B-Sl.no. OP 2373/2/8/08
Secondary Winding Resistance (DM3540A Multimeter)
Terminal R-Phase (Ohm) Y-Phase (Ohm) B-Phase (Ohm)
1a-1n (1&2) 0.9 0.8 0.8
2a-2n (3&4) 0.9 0.8 0.9
3a-3n (5&6) 0.9 0.8 0.9
IR Value Check (Meggering), 5KV. Megger 2.5KV-5KV
Terminal R-Phase (M-Ohm) Y-Phase (M-Ohm) B-Phase (M-Ohm)
Pry-Earth 5000 2500 3000
Pry-Sec1(1a) 4000 5000 5000
Pry-Sec2(2a) 4000 5000 4500
Pry-Sec3(3a) 5000 5000 4500
Secondary IR Value check (Meggering), 1KV. Megger 1KV
Terminal R-Phase (M-Ohm) Y-Phase (M-Ohm) B-Phase (M-Ohm)
Sec1-Earth 200 200 200
Sec2-Earth 200 200 200
Sec3-Earth 200 200 200
Sec1-Sec2 (1a-2a) 200 200 200
Sec2-Sec3 (2a-3a) 200 200 200
Sec3-Sec1 (3a-1a) 200 200 200
Precaution :
Conclusion :
From this test it is proved that there isn't any leakage or short circuit connection from primary to
earth through the casing. Neither is the secondary windings touching the casing or with each
other nor the primary winding is in contact with the secondary windings. The Potential
transformer is perfectly right.
CT Ratio Check
CT#1 : CT on Tie line Side
CT#2 : CT on Transformer I Side
CT#3 : CT on Bus Coupler Side
CT#4 : CT on Jemina Line Side
CT#5 : CT on Transformer II Side
Objective :
To check the ratio of primary to secondary current under loaded condition and compare
with the name plate rating.
Theory :
Current transformers (CTs) of all sizes and types find their way into substations to provide the
current replicas for metering, controls, and protective relaying. CT performance is characterized
by ratio correction factor (turns ratio error), saturation voltage, phase angle error, and rated
burden. Bushing CTs are installed in power equipment. They are toroidal, having a single
primary turn (the power conductor), which passes through their center. The current
transformation ratio results from the number of turns wound on the core to make up the
secondary. More than one ratio is often provided by tapping the secondary winding at multiple
turn's ratios. The core cross-sectional area, diameter, and magnetic properties determine the CT's
performance. Metering CTs are designed with core cross-sections chosen to minimize exciting
current effects and are allowed to saturate at fault currents. Larger cores are provided for
protection CTs where high current saturation must be avoided for the CT to faithfully reproduce
high currents for fault sensing. The exciting current of the larger core at low load is not
considered important for protection.
Core#1 : Metering.
Core#2 : Protection (Over Current,
Earth fault, Differential).
Core#3 : Bus bar Protection.
Core#4 : Bus Bar Protection Zone
Instruments used:
Circuit diagram:
Clamp meter
Current Transformer
Auto
Transformer
1-Ф Supply
Loading
Transformer
Junction Box
Procedure :
Precaution :
Results :
The results are being tabulated for each current transformer. The actual ratio given on the
name plate is 300-600/1A. The ratio replicates the name plate rating when the applied
load current approaches the name plate rating. The errors are more when 12.5% and 25%
of the total load current is applied. However as we apply more and more towards the
actual load value, the ratio is almost near the actual ratio. The accuracy of CT is
expressed in terms of its ratio from its true ratio. This is called ratio error and is expressed
as;
% 100
Is=Secondary current, Ip=Primary current
Conclusion :
From this experiment, it is proved that the name plate ratio replicates the field test report.
However the name plate ratio matches the field test ratio at 100% of the actual load current for
lowest tap. For the full tap 50% of the actual load current was provided. The ratio came close to
name plate rating at the 50% of the full load current. From this I conclude had we applied the full
load current we will be getting exact replicate of the name plate rating. We couldn't apply full
load current on 600/1A tap as the primary wire was getting heated up. More or less the obtained
results are correct.
The ratio error of a CT depends on its exciting current. When the primary current increases, the
CT tries to produce corresponding secondary current, and this needs a greater secondary emf,
core flux density and exciting current. A stage comes when any further increase in primary
current is almost wholly absorbed in an increased exciting current and thereby the secondary
current hardly increases at all. At this stage CT becomes saturated. Thus the ratio error depends
on saturation.
An accuracy of 2-3% of the CT is desirable for distance and differential relays, where as for
many other relays, a higher percentage can be tolerated. When the primary current increases, at a
certain value the core commences to saturate and the error increases. The value of current at
which the error reaches a specified error limit is known as its 'Accuracy Limit Primary Current'
or saturation current. The ratio of accuracy limit primary current and the rated primary current is
known as rated accuracy limit factor (ALF) or saturation factor, the standard value of which are
5,10,15,20 & 30.
Ratio Test of CVT and PT
CVT#1 : Capacitive Voltage Transformer (Tie Line side)
CVT#2 : Capacitive Voltage Transformer (Jemina side)
PT#1 : Potential Transformer of Bus (Transformer#1 side)
PT#2 : Potential Transformer of Bus (Transformer#2 side)
Aim :
¾ To find the ratio of primary voltage to the subsequent secondary voltage and then
compare with the given ratio in the name plate rating.
Objective :
To measure the voltage of three cores of each phase on the secondary winding and check
if the ratio is alright upon doubling the applied voltage on primary side.
Instrument used
Theory : Potential transformers are used to reduce the system voltage level low enough to
suit the ratings of protective relays. The voltage rating of protective relay is usually 110V. The %
error is given by;
% 100
Where K= Nominal voltage ratio, Vs= Secondary voltage and Vp=Primary voltage.
The accuracy of PTs used for meters and instruments is only important at normal system voltage
where as PTs used for protection requires errors to be limited over a wide range of voltages
under faulty conditions. This may be about 5-150% of nominal voltage.
Circuit diagram
AVΩ Meter
Supply
Procedure:
Results:
Observation:
1. From the result obtained the ratio of primary to secondary voltage is within the range
607-626 where as the actual ratio are 600. The experimented ratio is slightly greater than
the actual value.
66000/√3
600
110/√3
There is slight error which may be because of the inaccuracy of voltage applied from the
transformer. However the results are fairly correct.
Precaution:
Conclusion:
From this test it is seen that the ratio of primary to secondary voltage is fairly correct with
maximum of 6.5% error. For Lab test an error of ±5% is the accepted while for the field test an
error of ±15% is accepted. The error can be eliminated by using more accurate meter, and
applying the accurate voltage. Since the analog meter was used for noting the reading on the
primary side, may be exact voltage wasn’t applied, parallax error might have introduced in the
process. However the result doesn’t deviate much from the exact value thus the name plate rating
is ok.
Knee Point Voltage Test (KPV Test) of Current Transformer
CT #1 : Incoming line CT (Tie Line)
CT#2 : CT on Transformer I side
CT#3 : Bus Coupler CT
CT#4 : Incoming line #2 CT (Jemina Line)
CT#5 : CT on Transformer II Side
Objective :
This test should confirm that at any case the saturation point shouldn’t lie before 100% of
KPV. It may occur at 110% or higher, doesn’t matter but saturation point shouldn't occur
before 100% of the KPV. If saturation point occurs before 100% of KPV then the relays
will operate before reaching its set value (100%) which is not desirable.
To find the saturation point of CT i.e. at what point of voltage it get saturated.
Compare the obtained saturation point with that of the name plate rating.
Theory :
Knee point voltage is the point on the graph obtained between voltage and current beyond which
the current rise is very sharp when voltage in increased slightly. When the applied voltage is
increased in steps the current also rises in certain step. When the knee point voltage is reached
then the current shoots up beyond its normal increasing step. Therefore in this test we see
whether the KPV given on the name plate is correct or not. If the saturation point is reached
before the actual KPV then the relays are going to trip before fault occurs. In fact the relays
should trip upon reaching KPV or later. Therefore for proper coordination and tripping or relays
KPV should be checked accurately. Since minimum KVP at lowest tap is provided for core 3 &4
of CT, so we test KPV for only these cores.
V
KPV
0
I
Instrument used:
Procedure:
Current Transformer #1
Sl.No. 2373/1/5/08
Sl.No. 2373/1/12/08
Sl.No. 2373/1/10/08
Current Transformer #3
Sl.No. 2373/1/7/08
Sl.No. 2373/1/8/08
Sl.No. 2373/1/6/08
Clamp leaker
Junction box
1‐Ф, 230V, 50Hz
AVΩ Meter
Supply
Technical terms:
Name plate rating : Minimum Knee Point Voltage at lowest Tap = 325V
There are two tapping in each core of CT. Therefore in this case lowest tap refers to the tapping
between one end and the middle point. So at full tapping the Knee Point Voltage will be the
double of the KPV of lowest tap.
P1 P2
Primary
1S1 1S2 1S3 2S1 2S2 2S3 3S1 3S2 3S3 4S1 4S2 4S3
Knee Point Voltage is available for only core #3 and core #4. This is because these cores are
specifically designed for protection class core. For protection class core, saturation of current is
very important and need to protect the equipment from over current. Whenever the current
reaches its saturation point, relay should trip off. Therefore these cores have Knee point Voltage,
before which saturation shouldn’t occur.
However this is not the case with core#1 and core#2. These cores are specifically designed for
metering purposes, where accuracy is of much importance. If saturation point exists for these
cores then when the current increases beyond certain value, the meter will stop reading, in fact
the meter should record whatever the amount of current drawn. Therefore these cores are rated at
0.2 class of accuracy.
For half the winding of each core, the rated KPV is 325V therefore for full winding the rated
KPV is 650V. More the number of turns, greater will be the voltage and lesser will be the
current, thereby the ratings 325V, 60mA and 650V, 30mA.
If the saturation point is reached, CT will make humming sound and must be avoided.
Results :
2. CT Transformer 1 side, CT #2
3. CT on Bus Coupler, CT #3
4. CT on Jemina Line CT #4
400 400
350 357.5
325
300
Voltage (V)
250 243.75
200
KPV Curve
162.5
150
100
81.25
50
0
0 50 100 150 200 250
Current (mA)
700 715
650
600
Voltage (V)
500 487.5
400
325 KPV Curve
300
200
162.5
100
0
0 5 10 15 20 25
Current (mA)
Precaution :
Conclusion :
From this experiment it is proved that the saturation point of current doesn’t occur below 100%
of KPV. In fact it occurs beyond 110% of the rate KPV. Therefore this equipment is safe to use.
If the saturation point occurs before 100% of KPV then the relays connected to it will operate
under normal conditions also. When the saturation point occurs, the current rises to a very high
value, crossing the set point of relays which makes it to trip off, thus protecting the equipments.
This will allow only permissible amount of current to flow through the equipments.
Date : 13/10/09
Day : Tuesday
Time : 5:45pm
Weather : Sunset
Surge Monitor Testing
Aim : To check the deflection in the surge monitor.
Instrument Used :
Model : SM‐T2B‐3R
Sl.No. 5300
Megger
Procedure:
1. Connect positive terminal of the Megger to the top portion of the surge monitor as shown
above.
2. Connect the other terminal to the earth terminal.
3. Start Meggering
Observation:
• When voltage (1KV) was applied to the surge monitor by Meggering, the pointer inside
the surge monitor started deflecting.
• In some case the pointer didn’t deflect indicating that the monitor is not working.
Precaution :
Conclusion :
From this test we can know whether the surge monitor is working or not. If there is no deflection
then it is proved that the surge monitor is not working and need to be replaced. If the indicator
inside the surge monitor starts to deflect upon the application of voltage then it is proved that the
surge monitor is working.
SF6 Circuit Breaker Testing
CB#1 : Circuit Breaker on Incomer#1 (Tie Line)
CB#2 : Circuit Breaker on Transformer#1 side
CB#3 : Circuit Breaker on Bus Coupler Side
CB#4 : Circuit Breaker on Incomer#2 (Jemina Line)
CB#5 : Circuit Breaker on Transformer#2 side
Objective :
Theory :
The Nominal pressure of SF6 gas at 20ºC is 6.0 bars. When the loss of SF6 gas occurs below
certain set value it gives an alarm indicating less SF6 gas. So we need to attend to it by refilling.
If we fail to attend to the alarm, then when the pressure of SF6 gas falls further, then Lock out of
SF6 occurs. At this point the circuit breaker neither opens nor closes i.e. it remains in deadlock
position.
Instruments used :
Circuit diagram :
To Circuit Breaker
Junction Box
Red : (3, 4, 5)
Yellow : 17
Green : 7 for trip 1 and
12 for trip 2
DC +ive, CB
Coil Source
C +ive, CB
Close Coil
terminal
T +ive, CB
Source
Trip Coil
terminal
Source
Master Earthing
(Double Earthing)
SF6 Breaker Testing with the Testing Equipment of BPC ( Circuit Breaker Operational
Analyzer Model 2406 HISAC, Sl. no. 3290-009).
R Y B
Master
Earthing
(Double
Earthing)
To Circuit
Breaker
Junction Box Power Supply
Figure 7 SF6 Circuit Breaker Testing with Circuit Breaker Operational Analyzer
NB: The terminals from the kit are to be connected as given in the earlier diagram and the
wires refer the same definition.
Procedure :
PART-I
1. Connect the SF6 gas pipe to the breaker and start filling up the gas.
2. Fill up till the pressure reaches 1.0bar.
3. Check all the pipes and SF6 breaker for any leakage with the help of Refrigerant Leak
Detector. If leakage is there, then it makes continuous beeping sound. To find the exact
leak area, apply shampoo foam over the area. Wherever the pore is, the bubble becomes
big and burst out.
4. Leave the Breaker at 1.0bar for few hours. If leakage is there, the pressure falls down.
5. If there is no leakage then fill up the breaker with SF6 gas at 6.0bars.
6. At certain pressure (5.0 bars approx.) general lock out SF6 will occur. The multimeter
connected across alarm (X1-4, K11-A1) and trip contact (X1-4, K10-A1) will make
continuity sound.
7. Increase the pressure until it reaches certain point (5.3bars approx.) when the multimeter
connected across alarm and trip contact stops making continuity sound. This is the Alarm
Loss of gas pressure.
8. Still fill up the breaker with SF6 gas until the pressure reaches 6.0bars and disconnect it.
PART-II
Sl. No. Motor Sl. No. Close Coil (Ω) Trip Coil 1(Ω) Trip Coil 2(Ω)
2009/IND/03/6059 - 50.0 50.0 50.0
2009/IND/03/6060 289-087 50.4 50.3 50.6
2009/IND/03/6061 289-349 48.5 50.1 50.6
2009/IND/03/6058 289-436 50.9 50.2 50.0
2009/IND/03/6062 289-543 49.7 49.7 50.1
Result :
• The rated time for closing is 50±8 ms; therefore the value that we obtained is within the
range.
• The rated opening time is 30±4 ms; therefore the value we obtained is within the
permissible limit.
• The rated close-open time is 30±10 ms; therefore the value we obtained is within the
normal range.
Precaution :
Conclusion :
From this field test I came to learn that the results are correct and the SF6 circuit breaker is safe
to use. Of course one SF6 circuit breaker on Jemina side had leakage therefore it was replaced
and tested. Rests of the circuit breaker are working fine. Sometimes the tripping coil gets burned
often as in case of Jemina line circuit breaker, the reason being the flow of continuous current,
low resistance of the coil and appearance of high voltage across its terminal. For resistance
check, apply voltage across the terminals for 15s and then check the current obtained and cross
check with the actual value.
Transformer Winding Resistance
Aim : To find out the Winding Resistance of Transformer and of its respective CTs.
Objective :
Theory : There are three current transformers in 20MVA Transformer viz. winding
temperature indicator current transformer (WTICT), Neutral current transformer (NCT) and LV
phase current transformers. WTICT is connected to the bellow heater in the WTI. When
transformer is loaded the current flows through the CT and flows through the heater coil, thereby
the temperature indicated by WTI becomes the winding oil temperature and the winding
temperature. In no load condition the WTI temperature and the OTI temperature are same as
indicated in the dehydration curve. NCT is located below the neutral point in secondary winding
and for each LV phases there is CT. Tap # 9 is normal position with turn's ratio two, so whenever
we do normal test we take tap # 9. For this test we simply use Ohm's law.
Connections: WTICT (15, 16). NCT (18, 19, 20). LV R-Ph CT (21, 22, 23), LV Y-Ph CT (24,
25, 26), LV B-Ph CT (27, 28, 29).
Instruments used :
Circuit diagram :
Procedure :
Result :
Precautions :
Conclusion :
From this field test, the winding resistances of CTs are below 1.5Ω. As indicated on the name
plate rating. The winding resistance of NCT, LV Phase CTs and WTICT are permissibly correct.
Transformer Testing
(IR Check, Ratio Check, Magnetizing Balance Check, Magnetizing Current
Check, Vector Group Check)
Aim :
Objectives :
¾ To find out the insulation resistance between HV-Earth, LV-Earth and HV-LV terminals
and to ensure there is no leakage to earth i.e. continuity check.
¾ To ensure that the turns ratio for each tapping is in accordance to the name plate rating.
¾ To ensure that the magnetic balance is not disturbed.
¾ To observe the no load magnetizing current.
¾ To ensure the vector group DYN 11.
Theory :
In this, two phase supply is applied to one of the winding and the induced voltages on the
other two windings are measured. The voltage applied on the windings should be the sum
of the voltage induced on other two windings. If the phase displacements are correct then
the flux distribution on each winding will also be proportionate i.e. upon repeating the
applied voltage to other phases too, the sum of induced voltages should be equal to the
applied voltage. In the readings one will see the maximum value being in the diagonal.
In case of LV side which is star connected, magnetic balance test ensures that the
windings are not displaced with respect to the neutral point. If windings are displaced
from each other then we say neutral is displaced, which means some currents are flowing
in the neutral point (Earth Fault). By KCL, current flowing in the neutral point should be
zero at balanced condition however practically it is not true. Therefore in order to satisfy
this condition neutral point is grounded so that any current flowing through neutral point
goes to earth. Here too the diagonal characteristic is observed.
Magnetizing Current
30° Lag or +30°
Instrument required :
Circuit diagram :
Procedure :
Precautions :
1. Safety of experimenter the first priority.
2. While Meggering, always discharge the current to avoid shock.
3. Always switch off the power supply when connecting the circuit to avoid spark.
Result:
• The field testing of the ratio of HV/LV at various tapings is found correct with slight
errors.
• The phase voltage of secondary is also found to be 1/√3 times that of line voltage.
• The actual ratio at normal tap is 2 i.e. 66/33KV.
• It is observed in the magnetizing balance check that the maximum voltage exists across
the diagonal element for HV and LV phase voltage.
NB: If the diagonal characteristics holds true for the phase voltages at LV side then it
is true for HV side. Further Vector Group check will also hold true.
• The vector group check for Dy11 also proved the equations or the vector characteristic
given.
Conclusion:
From the above field test it is proved that the results obtained are tallying with the name plate
ratings. Ratios at various taps are correct with some errors. The windings at the core are also
balanced at 120° from each other. The magnetizing current as observed during the field test is far
below 4% of the actual rated current. No load current should not exceed above 4% of the actual
rated current. It is observed that in the Y phase the current is comparatively less. The reason
being, the Y phase winding lies at the middle so the flux gets distributed equally to other
windings too thereby resulting in low currents. Whereas in other case very less flux gets to the
third winding (see the fig. below). The vector group is found to be Dy11. There are a total of
about 63 vector group, some of which are given at the theory portion.
Transformer Oil Testing
Aim : Dehydration & filtration of Transformer oil in the Transformer.
Objective :
1. To remove the moisture present in the core, windings, tank, radiator and the conservator
tank.
2. To check the insulation resistance (IR Value) of the Transformer using Megger and
observe the reading.
3. Check the Breakdown Voltage value (BDV) of the dehydrated oil.
Theory : After the erection of Transformer at site, dehydration and filtration of oil is very
important. Here 'Transformer Oil Conditioning Machine' is used. There are two outlets in this
machine; one is used as incoming oil source and the other acts as outgoing source. After
connecting one pipe to the transformer tank and the other to the oil barrel start the machine and
fill the transformer with oil. Don’t fill it fully; as transformer oil gets heated its volume expands.
Now connect both pipes to transformer where one draws oil from the transformer and the other
pumps in the dehydrated oil coming from the Transformer oil conditioning machine. There are
moistures present in core and windings. When the oil is heated, by virtue of core and windings
being immersed in the oil, it gets heated. As a result of this the moisture present, in the core and
windings vaporize out and gets mixed with the oil. This oil is then passed into the oil
conditioning machine. The oil passes through 'degassing chamber' in two stages where the oil is
set to flow in the form of fountain. When this process happens the moisture is sent out from the
oil which is then sucked by the vacuum pump. The oil further passes through heater and filter
vessel where the oil gets heated and gets filtered of carbon deposits, dirt, sludge, etc. particles.
The oil is again pumped in the transformer. It heats the core and the process continues. During
the process of Transformer Oil Conditioning, check the IR value of the transformer every after
one hour. Theoretically the Megger value should come down and then rise up until it attains a
stable value. When it attains stable value for multiple Meggering then it shows that the oil is
dehydrated. Then collect sample oil for BDV test. The BDV value shouldn’t come below 60KV.
IR Value Pry-Earth
IR Value Pry-Sec
IR Value Sec-Earth
Fig. 1
Sample Graph
IR Value
0 Time
Instruments used:
Circuit diagram
HV LV
Earth
Procedure :
PART I
1. Connect the pipes at respective inlet and outlet of the Transformer oil conditioning
machine.
2. Connect the other end to the oil drum and the inlet to the 'Top Oil Filter Valve' of the
transformer tank.
3. Start the machine and fill up the transformer to certain level but not fully so that when at
peak temperature of the oil the volume expanded will not overflow the oil from the
transformer.
4. When heating the oil, please observe the source load and the load that the one heater
absorbs. (In our case the source load was 130A whereas each heater consumes 80A.
There are three heaters, so we were bound to switch on only one heater.)
5. Now for dehydration and filtration, connect the pipe connecting the oil drum to the
'Bottom Oil Filter Valve' of the transformer tank.
6. Start the machine with one heater being switched on.
7. Disconnect the earth terminal from the neutral point. Start Meggering with HV-Earth,
LV-Earth and HV-LV and record the reading every one hour until the readings comes
down and rise up to attain a stable value. N.B The process may go on for two to three
days. Then put off the heater and cool the oil with machine under running condition.
8. Take the oil sample (two bottles) for Breakdown Voltage test. The average of six
readings obtained should be above 60KV. This ends the dehydration and filtration test.
1. Arrange the BDV testing kit (Automatic Oil Test Set OTS100AF/Megger)
2. Wash the oil container thoroughly with oil form one bottle.
3. Pour the oil sample from other bottle and place it in the testing kit.
4. Adjust the space between the electrodes to 2.5mm.
5. Keep it idle for 15minutes so that the oil sample settles down.
6. Set the standard to IEC 156 1995 and then press the button to apply voltage.
Precaution :
Results :
With the help of thermostat the maximum temperature was fixed at 60˚C.
5:18pm 10000 10000 10000 52 48 47
6:20pm 10000 10000 10000 56 51 50
7:25pm 10000 10000 10000 60 54 52
10:30pm 8000 8000 8000 60 56 54
Radiators
Radiator Open (Time) Close (Time) Remarks
1 10:15am 10:50am
2 11:00am 11:40am
3 12:30pm 1:30pm All radiators opened on 28/10/2009 at
6:30pm. Heater switched off and cooling
4 1:30pm 2:40pm of the oil started with machine under
5 2:40pm 3:10pm running condition. Machine stopped at
6 3:10pm 3:40pm 29/10/2009 at 9:45am. Oil sample taken
7 3:40pm 4:10pm for BDV Test at SMD, Semtokha.
OLTC Filtration started at 4:00pm till
8 4:10pm 4:40pm 6:00pm on 29/10/2009.
9 5:10pm 5:40pm
10 6:10pm 6:30pm
Graphical Analysis :
10000
8000
IR Value
6000
Transformer Oil Characteristic
4000 Curve
2000
0
11:56am
3:30pm
7:25pm
2:35am
8:30am
11:30am
2:30pm
5:30pm
8:30pm
11:30pm
2:30am
5:30am
8:30am
11:30am
3:30pm
6:30pm
Time
Transformer Oil Characteristic Curve LV‐Earth
12000
10000
8000
IR Value
6000
4000 Transformer Oil Characteristic
Curve LV‐Earth
2000
0
11:56am
11:30am
11:30pm
11:30am
3:30pm
7:25pm
2:35am
8:30am
2:30pm
5:30pm
8:30pm
2:30am
5:30am
8:30am
3:30pm
6:30pm
Time
10000
8000
IR Value
6000
4000 TransformerOil
Characteristic curve HV-LV
2000
0
11:56am
3:30pm
7:25pm
2:35am
8:30am
11:30am
2:30pm
5:30pm
8:30pm
11:30pm
2:30am
5:30am
8:30am
11:30am
3:30pm
6:30pm
Time
One pair of Radiators opened and closed after every one hour subsequently.
All Radiator s opened at 4:30pm, 2/11/09 for cooling. Machine stopped at 4:00pm, 3/11/09
7:00pm 8000 9000 9000 60 62 62
1/11/2009
Transformer Oil Curve HV‐Earth
12000
10000
IR Value (MΩs)
8000
6000
4000 Transformer Oil Curve HV‐Earth
2000
0
1:00pm
4:00pm
7:00pm
10:00pm
1:00am
4:00am
7:00am
10:00am
1:00pm
4:00pm
7:00pm
10:00pm
1:00am
4:00am
7:00am
10:00am
1:00pm
4:00pm
Time
Transformer Oil Characteristic Curve LV‐Earth
12000
10000
IR Value (MΩs)
8000
6000
4000 Transformer Oil Characteristic
Curve LV‐Earth
2000
0
10:00pm
10:00am
10:00pm
10:00am
1:00pm
4:00pm
7:00pm
1:00am
4:00am
7:00am
1:00pm
4:00pm
7:00pm
1:00am
4:00am
7:00am
1:00pm
4:00pm
Time
Transformer Oil Characteristic Curve HV‐LV
12000
10000
IR Value (MΩs)
8000
6000
4000 Transformer Oil Characteristic
Curve HV‐LV
2000
0
1:00pm
4:00pm
7:00pm
10:00pm
1:00am
4:00am
7:00am
10:00am
1:00pm
4:00pm
7:00pm
10:00pm
1:00am
4:00am
7:00am
10:00am
1:00pm
4:00pm
Time
Breakdown values of Transformer Oil with 4mm gap between 13mm diameter spheres.
Oil Temp. °C 30 40 50 60 70
BDV KV 35 38 40 45 50
Courtesy: Installation, commissioning and maintenance of electrical equipment, Tarlok Singh.
Conclusion :
From the graphical analysis it shows that the IR value decreases, and rise to a stable value thus
indicating that the moisture from the core and the oil is removed. Further the BDV test clearly
shows that the breakdown voltage is very good. Therefore dehydration and filtration of
transformer oil is completed.
Winding Resistance and Ratio Check of 33kv CT & PT
Panel 1 CT (Outgoing Feeder) : 300-150/1-1-1A
Panel 2 CT (Outgoing Feeder) : 300-150/1-1-1A
Panel 3 CT & PT (Outgoing Feeder) : 300-150/1-1-1A, 33kV/√3/110/√3.
Panel 4 CT (Incomer 2) : P1:-400-200/1-1A & P2:-400-200/1-1A,
33kV/√3/110/√3
Panel 5 CT (Bus Coupler) : 400-200/1-1A
Panel 6 : Adapter Feeder has no CT
Panel 7 CT (Incomer 1) : P1:-400-200/1-1A & P2:-400-200/1-1A,
33kV/√3/110/√3
Panel 8 CT (Outgoing Feeder) : 300-150/1-1-1A, 33kV/√3/110/√3
Panel 9 CT (Outgoing Feeder) : 300-150/1-1-1A
Panel 10 CT (Outgoing Feeder) : 300-150/1-1-1A
Objectives :
• To check the secondary winding resistance of CT and PT
• To check the ratio of primary to secondary current of various cores under loaded
condition and compare with the name plate rating.
• To check the Insulation Resistance value of Potential Transformer.
Theory : Current transformer and Potential Transformer are used for metering and
protection. The Current Transformer used here have two ratio i.e. 150/1A and 200/1A. Both the
incomers have used the ratio of 200/1A while the outgoing feeders have used 150/1A. The
reason being, since the LV current of each Transformer is 349.91A each phase will be carrying
116.366A therefore keeping the ratio at 400/1A will mar the accuracy that is why 200/1A have
been selected as the CT ratio. There are three outgoing feeder for each Transformer which will
be carrying the total current from the Transformer. Here too, at the maximum, each feeder will
be able to carry a load of 116.366A therefore we set the CT ratio to 150/1A instead of 300/1A.
However there is every possibility that one feeder may be lightly loaded and the other heavily
loaded where by the loading may cross over 150A. For this reason the CT ratio 300/1A should
also be checked so that it can be put to use in the above mentioned case.
The CT of outgoing feeders has three cores of which core 3 is spare core and has been shorted.
CT secondary should never be left open. For the same power when current is stepped down from
300 to 1A, the voltage will rise by that many times. Core 1 has been used for metering while core
2 is used for protection. The incomers have four cores. Core 1 is used for metering, Core 2 for
protection, Core 3(PS) is used for Restricted Earth Fault Protection and Core 4 is used for
differential protection. Incomers have two CT connected in series, each CT containing two cores
thereby four cores in total.
Instruments Used :
Circuit diagram P1 P2
Ωm
DMM
Pictorial View
PT
DMM
CT Ratio Check
R Y B
1-Ф Supply
Procedure :
1. Remove the earth terminal from three phase of PT from the lower side of the box. Make
sure there is no connection from the PT to earth.
2. Using the Multi meter as ohmmeter and measure the winding resistance of the respective
secondary windings and of respective phases
3. For measuring the winding resistance of CT, connect the multimeter (as ohm meter)
terminal to the respective secondary terminals of the Current Transformer.
4. Tabulate the reading and compare with the standard/manufacturer value.
Precaution :
Results :
The results are being tabulated for each current transformer and potential transformer. The actual
ratio given on the name plate are 300-150/1-1-1A and 400-200/1-1A. The error limits doesn’t
cross over 15%. Therefore the results are correct.
PT WINDING RESISTANCE
Date:15/10/09, Sunday, Sunny.
Panel 3, Outgoing Feeder, Type: OG001 (W013), Breaker rating 1250A.
Terminal R: 09/34228 (Ω) Y: 09/34224 (Ω) B: 09/34218 (Ω)
1a-1n 0.9 0.9 0.9
2a-2n 0.9 0.8 0.9
Panel 8, Outgoing Feeder, Type: OG001 (W013), Breaker rating 1250A.
Terminal R: 09/34220 (Ω) Y: 09/34227 (Ω) B: 09/34229 (Ω)
1a-1n 0.8 0.9 0.8
2a-2n 0.8 0.8 0.9
Panel 7, Incomer 1, Type: IC002 (W003), Breaker rating 1250A.
Terminal R: 09/34221 (Ω) Y: 09/34223 (Ω) B: 09/34225 (Ω)
1a-1n 0.9 0.8 0.8
2a-2n 0.8 0.9 0.9
Panel 4, Incomer 2, Type: IC001 (W008), Breaker rating 1250A.
Terminal R: 09/34226 (Ω) Y: 09/34219 (Ω) B: 09/34222 (Ω)
1a-1n 0.8 0.7 0.7
2a-2n 0.8 0.8 0.8
CT RATIO CHECK
Panel 1 CT Station Feeder, 1S1-1S2, 150/1A: Metering.
Date: 24/11/2009, Tuesday, Sunny.
R-Sl.no. 09/24596, Y-Sl.no. 09/24580, B-Sl.no. 09/24590
Secondary Current (A)
Applied Primary
Current (A) R-phase Y-phase B-phase
(A) Ratio % error (A) Ratio % error (A) Ratio % error
50 0.32 156.25 4.17% 0.36 138.89 -7.41% 0.34 147.06 -1.96%
75 0.50 150.00 0.00% 0.49 153.06 2.04% 0.52 144.23 -3.85%
150 1.01 148.51 -0.99% 1.03 145.63 -2.91% 1.00 150.00 0.00%
Panel 1 CT, 2S1-1S2, 150/1A: Protection.
50 0.32 156.25 4.17% 0.34 147.06 -1.96% 0.36 138.89 -7.41%
75 0.50 150.00 0.00% 0.50 150.00 0.00% 0.51 147.06 -1.96%
150 1.01 148.51 -0.99% 1.01 148.51 -0.99% 1.00 150.00 0.00%
Panel 2 CT Outgoing Feeder, 1S1-1S2, 150/1A: Metering.
R-Sl.no. 09/24583, Y-Sl.no. 09/24579, B-Sl.no. 09/24585
50 0.33 151.52 1.01% 0.34 147.06 -1.96% 0.33 151.52 1.01%
75 0.50 150.00 0.00% 0.49 153.06 2.04% 0.50 150.00 0.00%
150 1.02 147.06 -1.96% 1.02 147.06 -1.96% 1.02 147.06 -1.96%
Panel 2 CT, 1S1-1S3, 300/1A: Not Used.
50 0.15 333.33 11.11% 0.15 333.33 11.11% 0.15 333.33 11.11%
75 0.23 326.09 8.70% 0.24 312.50 4.17% 0.24 312.50 4.17%
150 0.49 306.12 2.04% 0.48 312.50 4.17% 0.49 306.12 2.04%
Panel 2 CT, 2S1-1S2, 150/1A: Protection.
50 0.33 151.52 1.01% 0.32 156.25 4.17% 0.33 151.52 1.01%
75 0.51 147.06 -1.96% 0.49 153.06 2.04% 0.50 150.00 0.00%
150 0.99 151.52 1.01% 1.02 147.06 -1.96% 1.02 147.06 -1.96%
Panel 2 CT, 2S1-2S3, 300/1A: Not Used.
50 0.15 333.33 11.11% 0.15 333.33 11.11% 0.15 333.33 11.11%
75 0.23 326.09 8.70% 0.24 312.50 4.17% 0.24 312.50 4.17%
150 0.49 306.12 2.04% 0.49 306.12 2.04% 0.49 306.12 2.04%
Panel 3 CT Outgoing Feeder, 1S1-1S2, 150/1A: Metering.
R-Sl.no. 09/24583, Y-Sl.no. 09/24579, B-Sl.no. 09/24585
50 0.33 151.52 1.01% 0.33 151.52 1.01% 0.33 151.52 1.01%
75 0.50 150.00 0.00% 0.50 150.00 0.00% 0.51 147.06 -1.96%
150 1.14 131.58 -12.28% 1.01 148.51 -0.99% 1.00 150.00 0.00%
Conclusion : From this field test, it confirms that the secondary winding resistances are
within its permissible value. The CT and PT Ratio also match with the name plate rating. The
Insulation Resistance value also shows good insulation. The CT ratios have been checked for
every core and for both the ratio. Thus we hereby conclude that the equipment has no defect and
can be put to use.
HIGH POT TEST (CABLE HV TEST)
Aim : Testing of XLPE Cables.
Objective :
Theory : High POT Test or Cable HV Test or High Pressurized Test, anyone one
may say but all these are same. Such tests are performed to know the IR value of the insulation
and the leakage current flowing into the ground. This test can be done with AC as well as DC. In
fact this test should be done with AC but wherever possibility doesn’t exist we go for DC supply.
This test will also confirm whether the cable will be able to withstand the desired voltage. Cables
have a capacitive effect so when we apply AC voltage, it will allow the current the pass through
without any hindrance but blocks the DC therefore the current will be quite high (in terms of
amperes), so such current will trip. But the testing kit is meant to measure current in terms of
miliamperes. If we go for DC then the current required for charging the capacitor will be very
less which tallies with our testing kit. Therefore we convert the AC supply to DC supply with the
help of Rectifier and the current limiting resistor and supply the voltage. DC voltage is root 2
times the AC voltage. Since the capacitor remains charged once the voltage is applied it is
necessary to discharge the capacitor after finishing the experiment in order to avoid shock.
Discharge it to ground with discharge rod. While doing for Bus Section we use AC voltage since
here we do not have capacitive effect. The conductors are rectangular copper plates. If dust and
moisture is present then the spark will occur before actual withstand voltage is applied. In such
case we will have to clean and heat the surrounding of the conductor and then do the test. While
doing the experiment one may notice that the pointer of the AVΩ meter keeps on fluctuating
indicating the presence of dust. As we increase the voltage beyond 30KV, hissing sound occurs
indicating the inception of Corona. While increasing the voltage the air around the conductor
also gets ionized and if moisture is present around then the voltage gets discharged through the
conducting medium (moisture) to the ground.
While discharging the cable after the test, if the discharge is high then it indicates the capacitive
effect is more indicating longer cables thereby more leakage and weaker insulation. Better the
insulation and shorter the length of the cable, lesser will be the discharge (spark). The leakage
current should be within 10-15mA.
Instruments Used :
Experimental diagram :
Current Limiting Resistor
B Y R
Rectifier
1‐Ф Supply
E
1‐Ф Supply AVΩ
Meter
High Voltage Tester
Procedure :
PART I (Before HV Test)
PART II
1. Short any two phases (say Y & B) with earth terminal. Leave the other phase (say R)
unconnected.
2. Connect the terminal from the HV Transformer to R phase.
3. Switch on the power supply.
4. Gradually increase the voltage up to 40kV DC and keep it for 5 minutes.
5. Check the leakage current in the ammeter connected to the HV Transformer.
6. Note down the reading.
7. Repeat step 1-6 Y and B phase too.
8. For Bus section where bare conductors is there, use AC voltage for 1 minute.
PART III
1. After completing Part I & II, then Connect Megger to R-earth phase and supply the
power.
2. Observe the IR value after the meter pointer attains a steady value.
3. Connect Megger to Y-Earth and supply the power.
4. Repeat step 3 for B-Earth terminals.
5. Check the Megger value for phase to phase i.e. R-Y, Y-B & B-R.
6. Note down the readings carefully.
Precautions :
1. Safety the first priority.
2. When high voltage is being injected don’t allow anyone to stand nearby the testing kit.
3. Make sure no one is there on the equipment on which test is being carried out.
4. Forget not, to keep one person guarding the other end of cable so that no one comes
nearby the cable under test.
5. Always increase the voltage gradually. If sparking occurs, it is due to moisture and dust,
so make the area clean and dry.
6. After completing the test always discharge the charge from the cable with the help of
discharge rod before touching it with bare hand.
HIGH POT TEST (CABLE HV TEST): Cable between Transformer 1 and 33kV Panel 7.
Date: 26/11/2009, 10:40am, Location: Inside the room. Temperature : 12°C
IR Check of Cable ( 5KV Motorized Megger)
Terminals Before HV Test (MΩ) After HV Test (MΩ)
R-Earth 10000 10000
Y-Earth 10000 10000
B-Earth 10000 10000
R-Y Phase 10000 10000
Y-B Phase 10000 10000
B-R Phase 10000 10000
40 KV DC applied to the Cable under Test for 5 minutes
Terminals Leakage Current (µA)
R- Y+B+Earth 10
Y- R+B+Earth 10
B- Y+R+Earth 10
HIGH POT TEST (CABLE HV TEST): Cable between Transformer 2 and 33kV Panel 4.
Date: 26/11/2009, Location: Inside the room. Temperature : 12°C
IR Check of Cable ( 5KV Motorized Megger)
Terminals Before HV Test (MΩ) After HV Test (MΩ)
R-Earth 10000 10000
Y-Earth 10000 10000
B-Earth 10000 10000
R-Y Phase 10000 4500
Y-B Phase 10000 5000
B-R Phase 10000 4000
40 KV DC applied to the Cable under Test for 5 minutes
Terminals Leakage Current (µA)
R- Y+B+Earth 10
Y- R+B+Earth 7
B- Y+R+Earth 37
Observation :
While the experiment is under test, one will observe the inception of corona above 30kV/cm2.
Hissing sound will be noticed indicating the inception of corona. Some sparking sound may be
heard indicating the presence of dust particles. If moisture is present then the voltage trips off
through spark before reaching the set voltage as it happened for B-phase of Bus Section 1. So we
heated the area with halogen lamp, cleaned the conductor thoroughly and performed the test
which gave better result.
While Meggering, initially the pointer moves towards zero indicating the capacitance of the
cable being charged i.e. the current is drawn to charge the capacitance of the cable so no current
flows through the cable. However after the capacitive effect of the cable, the current passes
through cable thus indicating the IR value. For Long cables the pointer may stick at zero for
longer time indicating greater capacitance however the pointer will rise slowly.
Conclusion :
The result shows very good IR value of the cable and bus section. The leakage current found is
very less ranging in micro amperes while the normal leakage current comes in 10-15mA. For
better result the conductors should be free from dust particles and moisture free. However our
results have good IR values and lesser leakage current indicating the stability of cable under the
desired voltage. Therefore the cables are good and healthy.
Relay Testing (Over Current Protection)
Aim : Testing of Inverse Definite Minimum Time (IDMT) and Earth Fault Relay of
33KV Vacuum Circuit Breaker.
Objective :
¾ Find out the trip time of IDMT Relay under Normal condition.
¾ Find out the trip time of IDMT Relay under High Set condition.
¾ Find out the trip time of Earth Fault IDMT under Normal Condition.
¾ Find out the trip time of Earth Fault IDMT under High Set Condition.
Theory : An over current protection device protects the circuit by opening the
device when the current reaches a value that will cause an excessive or dangerous temperature
rise in conductors. The time it takes for an over current protection device (OCPD) to open is
inversely proportional to the magnitude of the fault current. Thus, the higher the ground-fault
current, the less time it takes for the OCPD to open and clear the fault.
Inverse Definite Minimum Time Over current (IDMT) relay gives inverse-time current
characteristics at lower values of the fault current and definite-time characteristics at higher
values of the fault current (Used in distribution line).
Here we set the current and Trip time at a particular value and then injects higher current and
note the Trip time obtained. The field test should
confirm that the trip time obtained should not be
greater than the set time. According to British
standards, the following are the important
characteristics of over current relays.
Instruments Used :
Circuit Diagram:
Power
Supply
Procedure :
1. Set up the experiment as given above with the relay test set.
2. Set the 'Time Setting' of the relay as per the desired value and find out the calculated trip
time.
3. Set the 'Current Setting' of the relay as per the desired value.
4. Connect the wires from the relay test set to the 'Terminal Box' so as to obtain R-Y or Y-B
or B-R respectively.
5. To compare the time noted by the relay and the relay test set, connect the terminals from
the relay test set to the relay as shown in the figure above.
6. Now inject a bit higher current through the relay test set so as to provide fault and see the
trip time obtained.
7. After the fault has been injected note the tripping time and the LED indication.
8. Follow this procedure for O/C IDMT, O/C High Set, Earth Fault IDMT and Earth Fault
High Set conditions.
9. Repeat the same for other relays too.
Results :
The result shows that the 'Trip Time Obtained' is always lesser than the 'Calculated Trip Time'
indicating that the relays will operate faster. At the most the tripping time of the relay should not
be greater than that of the calculated trip time. In case of high set conditions the relay should trip
instantaneously, therefore we set the time to zero. The term 'High Set' is used for very fast relays
with operating time less than 0.1s. IDMT Over current relays gives inverse-time current
characteristics at lower values of fault current and definite time characteristics at higher values of
fault current. Generally, an inverse-time characteristic is obtained if the value of PSM is below
10. For the value of PSM between 10 and 20, the characteristics tend to become a straight line
i.e. towards a definite time characteristics.
R-Y 4 4 0 0 30 1
Y-B 4 4 0 0 30 1
B-R 4 4 0 0 30 1
3. Earth Fault IDMT (Iep)
R-Y 2 2 0 0 60 1,4
Y-B 2 2 0 0 50 1,4
B-R 2 2 0 0 60 1,4
R-Y 4 4 0 0 20 1
Y-B 4 4 0 0 30 1
B-R 4 4 0 0 30 1
3. Earth Fault IDMT (Iep)
R-Y 2 2 0 0 20 1,4
Y-B 2 2 0 0 20 1,4
B-R 2 2 0 0 20 1,4
R-Y 4 4 0 0 30 1
Y-B 4 4 0 0 50 1
B-R 4 4 0 0 50 1
3. Earth Fault IDMT (Iep)
R-Y 2 2 0 0 60 1,4
Y-B 2 2 0 0 60 1,4
B-R 2 2 0 0 60 1,4
R-Y 4 4 0 0 60 1,4
Y-B 4 4 0 0 50 1,4
B-R 4 4 0 0 60 1,4
3. Earth Fault IDMT (Iep)
R-Y 2 2 0 0 60 1,4
Y-B 2 2 0 0 50 1,4
B-R 2 2 0 0 60 1,4
R-Y 4 4 0 0 20 1,4
Y-B 4 4 0 0 30 1,4
B-R 4 4 0 0 20 1,4
3. Earth Fault IDMT (Iep)
R-Y 2 2 0 0 60 1,4
Y-B 2 2 0 0 60 1,4
B-R 2 2 0 0 60 1,4
R-Y 4 4 0 0 30 1,4
Y-B 4 4 0 0 30 1,4
B-R 4 4 0 0 20 1,4
3. Earth Fault IDMT (Iep)
R-Y 2 2 0 0 30 1,4
Y-B 2 2 0 0 30 1,4
B-R 2 2 0 0 20 1,4
R-Y 4 4 0 0 20 1,4
Y-B 4 4 0 0 30 1,4
B-R 4 4 0 0 30 1,4
3. Earth Fault IDMT (Iep)
R-Y 2 2 0 0 20 1,4
Y-B 2 2 0 0 30 1,4
B-R 2 2 0 0 20 1,4
Precautions :
Conclusion : From this test it is proved that the operating time of the relay is within its range.
The operating time doesn’t exceed the set time. For the entire outgoing feeder, the high set
condition the time set is zero so that the relay acts as instantaneous relay and trips off as soon as
the fault occurs. While in case of incomers, the time has been set to 0.03 so that this relays acts
only after the relays of the outgoing feeder trips off. In any case the trip time obtained is lesser
than the time set, thus indicating that the relays will clear the fault within the set time.
Stability Testing Report
Aim : To confirm the stability of the total system.
Objective :
Theory : This test is the last test done before charging the transformer. This test ensures
that every work done till now is stable. By applying certain amount of current on the primary of
the CT we check the current on the secondary side. By knowing the ratio of CT, we can find out
the secondary currents, which have to be traced till the relay panel and control panel. If the same
current exists then the system is stable. However sometimes we don’t get it. We may get
different secondary current, and then the connections have to be checked as the wire may be
connected mistakenly to other device. If there is any open circuit then we won't get current at the
end of the circuit. While performing this test one has to be thorough with the CT ratio of various
equipments so that when we get different values we will be able to know by calculation whose
secondary current is flowing. And also before checking one should know by calculation what
value of current should we get at that point. In fact this is the final test, here we know every
result but we are assuring that result by practically performing the test. Often there will be wrong
connections and open circuit.
For this we apply known value of current in the primary side of CT. We trace the secondary
current through CT junction box, Control panel (Metering circuit) and relay panel (distance
protection and bus bar protection). We also check the secondary CT current at Transformer
Junction box and follow up till its control panel where we check currents in MW, MVAR, MWT,
MVART, ATY, TVM, ASS, IC TB (Incoming TB) and O/C and E/F relay. We also trace it in
Relay panel where differential and bus bar protection are done.
After the system is found good then for the functioning of the relay we knowingly apply some
fault to the system such as changing the polarity of the connections and restricted earth fault.
Then we observe whether the relay are working and check the currents in the relay panel. The
panel should show abnormal current in the line of fault.
Instruments used :
Circuit diagram :
Procedure :
1. Open circuit the LV winding and remove the earth connection from the neutral point.
2. Don’t load the CT.
3. Short any two HV phases say R-Y.
4. Connect a wire to r-phase at LV side and bring out the terminal.
5. Connect an auto transformer to r-n at LV side and further connect the auto transformer to
1-Ф source.
6. Clutch the neutral wire with clamp meter and supply 10A current from the auto
transformer.
7. With the help of Clamp leaker check the current on Transformer Junction box (NCT). It
should reflect almost 25mA.
8. Trace this current till control and relay panel.
NB: - Shorting means we are applying fault current purposefully so that neutral gets
displaced. Actually neutral should have zero current but here we are supplying current in
neutral so that restricted earth fault occurs. We trace this fault current at transformer junction
box till the relay panel.
System Stability Check, Incomer 1, Tie Line side (Tie Line-Transformer 1-RP & CP)
Date: 1/11/2009, Sunday, Sunny.
Primary Current: R=14.37A, Y=14.65A, B=14.71A.
CT Secondary Current Check. CT Ratio 600/1A.
Core 1(mA) Core 2(mA) Core 3(mA) Core 4(mA) Actual current
CTJB CTJB CTJB CTJB
600/1A 600/1A 600/1A 600/1A (mA)
X1-1 R= 24.21 X2-1 R= 24.21 X3-7 R= 24.21 X4-7 R= 24.29 23.95
X1-2 Y= 24.12 X2-2 Y= 24.21 X3-8 Y= 24.43 X4-8 Y= 24.29 24.42
X1-3 B= 24.25 X2-3 B= 24.21 X3-9 B= 24.41 X4-9 B= 24.29 24.52
X1-7,8,9 N=0.00 X2-7,8,9 N=0.00 X3-1,2,3 N=0.00 X4-1,2,3 N=0.00 0.00
Relay Panel 1 (RP1). Distance (Core # 4), O/C & E/F Protection (Core # 2).
INC TB (mA) 21 Distance Relay(mA) INC CT TB(mA) 67 Relay(mA) HV Side
X1-5=A111=24.41 A112=Q1=24.41 X1-9=A211=24.41 A213(R)=24.45
X1-6=A131=24.49 A132=Q3=24.49 X1-10=A231=24.49 A283(Y)=24.45
X1-7=A151=24.48 A152=Q5=24.48 X1-11=A251=24.48 A253(B)=24.47
X1-8=A171=00.00 A172=Q7=00.00 X1-12=A271=00.00 A273(N)=00.00
MW : Megawatt
MVAR: Megavars
Relay Panel 5 (RP5). Differential Protection (Core # 4), O/C & E/F Protection (Core # 2).
O/C & E/F Protection Differential Protection
INC TB (mA) HV Terminal, Relay 87(mA) INC CT TB(mA) HV Terminal, Relay67(mA)
X1-1=A311= 44.31 A312= 24.41 X1-9=A313= 44.30 A315(R)= 44.30
X1-2=A331= 44.31 A332= 24.49 X1-10=A333= 44.40 A335(Y)= 44.40
X1-3=A351= 44.31 A352= 24.48 X1-11=A353= 44.30 A355(B)= 44.30
X1-4=A371= 00.00 A372= 00.00 X1-12=A373= 00.00 A375(N)= 00.00
System Stability Check, Bus Coupler side ( Tie Line- Bus coupler-RP & CP)
Date: 6/11/2009, Friday, Sunny.
Primary Current: R=13.33A, Y=13.33A, B=13.28A. Sec. current : r=26.55mA, y= 26.44mA, b=26.44mA
CT Secondary Current Check (Bus Coupler). CT Ratio 600-300/1-1A.
Core 1(mA) Core 2(mA) Core 3(mA) Core 4(mA) Actual current
CTJB CTJB CTJB CTJB (mA)
600/1A 600/1A 600/1A 600/1A
X1-1 1S1R= 22.21 X2-1 2S1R= 22.13 X3-7 3S3R= 22.33 X4-7 4S3R= 22.21 22.22
X1-2 1S1Y= 22.00 X2-2 2S1Y= 22.16 X3-8 3S3Y= 22.26 X4-8 4S3Y= 22.30 22.22
X1-3 1S1B= 22.31 X2-3 2S1B= 22.19 X3-9 3S3B= 22.21 X4-9 4S3B= 22.26 22.13
X1-4,5,6 1S3N= 00.00 X2-4,5,6 2S3N= 00.00 X3-1,2,3 3S1N= 00.00 X4-1,2,3 4S1N= 00.00 0.00
Primary current check as relay displayed found ok. O/p current from ICT found developed when CT polarity was reversed=ok.
Connect Phase-Earth fault to any of the HV line, so that fault gets injected and check the
differential current.
Connect Phase-Earth fault to any of the HV line, so that fault gets injected and check the
differential current.
Precaution :
Conclusion :
From the result obtained above it is confirmed that the pre commissioning test for the
substation is completed and the substation is ready for Test Charge. The result tallies with the
CT ratio and the connections have been checked. This is the last Pre-Commissioning Check
done on the system. The System Stability has been found healthy and wherever necessary the
connections have been checked.
Reference
Ram, Badri & Vishwakarma, D.N. (2008). Power System Protection and Switchgear. New Delhi
: Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing Company Limited.
Myers S.D, Kelly J.J & Parrish R.H (1981).A Guide to Transformer Maintenance. Akron, Ohio.
Transformer Maintenance Institute.
Dorf, Richard C (2000). The Electrical Engineering Handbook. Boca Raton. CRC Press LLC.
Laughton M.A & Warne D.J (2003).Electrical Engineer's Reference Book. Jordan Hill, Oxford,
Burlington. Reed Educational and Professional Publishing Limited.
Grigsby L.L (2001). The Electrical Power Engineering Handbook. Boca Raton, Washington.
CRC Press LLC.
Whitaker, Jerry C (1999). AC Power System Handbook. Boca Raton, Washington. CRC Press
LLC.
Page | 124