Professional Documents
Culture Documents
QUANTUM
MECHANICS
An Introduction to Relativistic
Quantum Fields
This page intentionally left blank
RELATIVISTIC
QUANTUM
MECHANICS
An Introduction to Relativistic
Quantum Fields
Luciano Maiani
Universit`a di Roma La Sapienza and INFN, Roma, Italy
Omar Benhar
Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Roma, Italy
Translated from the original Italian by Geoffrey Hall, Imperial College, London
CRC Press
Taylor & Francis Group
6000 Broken Sound Parkway NW, Suite 300
Boca Raton, FL 33487-2742
© 2016 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
CRC Press is an imprint of Taylor & Francis Group, an Informa business
This book contains information obtained from authentic and highly regarded sources. Reasonable
efforts have been made to publish reliable data and information, but the author and publisher cannot
assume responsibility for the validity of all materials or the consequences of their use. The authors and
publishers have attempted to trace the copyright holders of all material reproduced in this publication
and apologize to copyright holders if permission to publish in this form has not been obtained. If any
copyright material has not been acknowledged please write and let us know so we may rectify in any
future reprint.
Except as permitted under U.S. Copyright Law, no part of this book may be reprinted, reproduced,
transmitted, or utilized in any form by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or
hereafter invented, including photocopying, microfilming, and recording, or in any information stor-
age or retrieval system, without written permission from the publishers.
For permission to photocopy or use material electronically from this work, please access www.copy-
right.com (http://www.copyright.com/) or contact the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc. (CCC), 222
Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, 978-750-8400. CCC is a not-for-profit organization that pro-
vides licenses and registration for a variety of users. For organizations that have been granted a photo-
copy license by the CCC, a separate system of payment has been arranged.
Trademark Notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are
used only for identification and explanation without intent to infringe.
Visit the Taylor & Francis Web site at
http://www.taylorandfrancis.com
and the CRC Press Web site at
http://www.crcpress.com
Contents
List of Figures xi
List of Tables xiii
Preface xv
The Authors xvii
v
vi Contents
Bibliography 301
Index 305
This page intentionally left blank
List of Figures
8.1 The integration path and location of poles in the complex plane. 133
xi
This page intentionally left blank
List of Tables
xiii
This page intentionally left blank
Preface
xv
xvi Preface
xvii
This page intentionally left blank
CHAPTER 1
THE SYMMETRIES OF
SPACE-TIME
CONTENTS
1.1 The principle of relativity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1.2 Physical Lorentz transformations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
1.3 Causal structure of space-time . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
1.4 Contravariant and covariant vectors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
1.5 Problems for Chapter 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
1
2 RELATIVISTIC QUANTUM MECHANICS
Let us consider two events which differ by Δx and Δt, which we suppose to
be infinitesimal. We define the squared invariant length of the interval (Δt, Δx)
by the quantity1 :
If |Δx| = c|Δt|, the two events are connected through the propagation of a
light ray which leaves from the first event and arrives in exact coincidence with
1 Δs is often referred to as the line element.
THE SYMMETRIES OF SPACE-TIME 3
the second. Clearly this coincidence must occur in all reference frames and,
given the invariance of the speed of light, this implies that the difference should
also correspond to a zero invariant length in the transformed coordinates. As
a formula:
This condition can hold only if the transformation rule is such that:
Δs = λΔs ,
where λ must be independent of the coordinates and can only depend on the
magnitude of the velocity. Now we take into account that the relationship
between O and O is completely symmetric; seen from O, O moves at the
same speed at which O sees O travel. Therefore, exchanging the roles of the
two systems, it must also be true that:
Δs = λΔs , (1.2)
so that λ = ±1. The case −1 is excluded by the fact that the coordinate
transformations are continuously connected by the identity transformation,
which clearly has λ = +1; therefore we conclude that the transformations
(1.1) must conserve the invariant length of the interval between two events
(hence the name given to Δs). Given the linearity of the transformations, the
condition can immediately be extended to finite intervals.
To formalise the condition (1.2), we introduce the metric tensor gμν , which
allows us to rewrite Δs as:
s = gμν xμ xν = gμν Λμρ Λνσ xρ xσ = (Λμρ gμν Λνσ )xρ xσ = s (1.5)
ΛT gΛ = g . (1.7)
The system O moves in the direction of the positive x axis of O with speed
v. The explicit form of (1.1) is:
Δx = αΔx − δcΔt
cΔt = −Δx + ζcΔt (1.8)
Δy = Δy; Δz = Δz ,
with α, δ, , ζ to be determined. Moreover:
s = (ζ 2 −δ 2 )(cΔt)2 −(α2 −2 )(Δx)2 −2(ζ −αδ)(Δx)(cΔt)−(Δy )2 −(Δz )2 .
Setting λ = 1 in (1.2) we must require s = s, so that:
ζ 2 − δ 2 = α2 − 2 = 1
ζ − αδ = 0 . (1.9)
Equation (1.8) can be solved by substituting:
α = ζ = cosh(θ)
δ = = sinh(θ) , (1.10)
where θ is a real parameter (the rapidity) connected to the relative velocity
between O and O . If we set Δx = 0 in (1.8), the second equation of (1.8)
should define the motion of a stationary object in O seen from O, so Δx =
v · Δt.
Comparing, we obtain:
v
tanh(θ) = , (1.11)
c
and therefore, from (1.8), we obtain the well known special Lorentz transfor-
mations:
Δx = γ(Δx − βcΔt)
cΔt = γ(−βΔx + cΔt) (1.12)
v 1
β= , γ= .
c 1− v
2
c2
Comments.
• From (1.11) we see that the speed of a physical system cannot exceed c.
• Newton hypothesised a universal time, which flows equally in every
frame of reference. If, instead of using principle (3), we set t = t, the
special Lorentz transformations reduce to Galilean transformations:
x = x − v · t
t = t
which are obtained from (1.12) in the limit c → ∞ (non-relativistic
limit).
THE SYMMETRIES OF SPACE-TIME 5
P : x = −x; t = t . (1.14)
The proper transformations are for their part constituted of two discon-
nected components, which are distinguished according to whether or not they
invert the direction of time. Events with coordinates (t, 0) in O describe, as a
function of t, the history of a stationary clock at the origin of O. If we apply
the relation (1.1) we find:
t = Λ00 · t ,
therefore the sign of Λ00 determines whether the clocks of O run in the same
direction as in O. The transformations characterised by:
T : x = x; t = −t . (1.16)
Combining both P and T transformations, total inversion, I, is obtained,
which is a non-orthochronous but also proper transformation:
The changes between physically realisable IFs which are continuously con-
nected to the identity transformation are orthochronous. The principle of rel-
ativity must apply strictly only to these transformations.
The laws of physics are invariant under proper and orthochronous Lorentz
transformations. The corresponding group is usually denoted by L↑+ .
• Events with s = 0. They are found on the surfaces of two cones (light
cones), which represent the trajectories of light rays emerging from A
(future cone) or converging on A (past cone). They are known as lightlike.
• Events with s > 0, t > 0. They fill the interior of the future light cone;
they are events which can be influenced by event A, since they can be
reached by physically realisable signals originating from A which travel
at speeds less than c.
• Events with s > 0, t < 0. They fill the interior of the past light cone;
they are events which can influence event A, by means of physically
realisable signals which travel at speeds less than c. These events and
those of the preceding paragraph are known as timelike (see Problem 1).
• Events with s < 0. These are outside the light cones; they are events
which cannot have any causal relationship with A, because signals with
speeds exceeding c would be required. The events in this region form the
absolute present of A. They are known as spacelike events (see Problem
2).
measurement of one of them can exercise on the measurement of the other (for
example the measurement of p and x). Let us consider two observable quan-
tities whose measuring apparatus are localised in finite regions of space-time
(local observables). When the relevant region of one of the two observables is
located entirely in the present of the other, the principle of causality requires
that the two observables should be simultaneously measurable and the corre-
sponding operators should commute with each other. This principle is known
as microcausality.
In formal terms, covariant vectors are the elements of the dual space of the
vector space of contravariant vectors. In general, the dual V of a vector space
V is defined as the space of linear functionals of vectors y μ , of functions, that
is, defined for every y and z, such that:
f = f (y) ,
f (αy + βz) = αf (y) + βf (z)
with α and β numbers (in our case, real numbers). It is easy to show that
every element f of V can be written as:
f (y) = fμ y μ = fμ y μ = (f · y) , (1.24)
μ
Sect. 1.1
1. From the definition of velocity, (1.11) prove that the speed of a physical
system cannot exceed c.
2. Newton hypothesised a universal time, which flows equally in every frame
of reference. Work out the transformations obtained by setting set t = t,
thereby obtaining the Galilean transformations:
x = x − v · t
t = t .
THE SYMMETRIES OF SPACE-TIME 9
R · RT = 1
Sect. 1.2
1. Show that if an event has s > 0 it is possible to find an inertial frame in
which xμ = (t, 0). (Consequently, these events are called timelike).
2. Show that if an event has s < 0 it is possible to find an inertial frame in
which xμ = (0, x). (Consequently, these events are called spacelike).
3. Show that if an event has s = 0 it is possible to find an inertial frame in
which xμ = (|x|, x) and x aligned along the z axis. (These events are called
lightlike).
This page intentionally left blank
Bibliography
301
302 Bibliography
[17] Particle Data Group Collaboration. For the most recent data see Ref. [39].
[18] G. Luders, Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskab Matematisk-Fysiske
Meddelelser, 28 1 (1954).
[22] C.S. Wu, E. Ambler, R.W. Hayward, D.D. Hoppes, and R.P. Hudson,
Phys.Rev. 105, 1413 (1957). Parity violation was subsequently observed
in muon decays by R.L. Garwin, L.M. Lederman, and M., Weinrich, Phys.
Rev. 105, 1415 (1957). For a short history of the discovery of parity viola-
tion, see K. Myneni, http://ccreweb.org/documents/parity/parity.html.
[23] R.P. Feynman and M. Gell-Mann, Phys. Rev. 109, 193 (1958); see also
S.S. Gershtein, and J.B. Zeldovich, Sov. Phys. JETP 2, 576 (1957).
[24] J.C. Hardy and I.S. Towner, Phys.Rev. C 7, 055501 (2005); e-print arXiv
nucl-th/0412056.
[27] M. Kobayashi and T. Maskawa, Progr. Theor. Phys. 49, 652 (1973).
[28] J. Schwinger, Ann. Phys. 2, 407 (1957).
[31] G. Danby, J.M. Gaillard, K.A. Goulianos, L.M. Lederman, N.B. Mistry,
M. Schwartz, and J. Steinberger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 9, 36 (1962).
[34] Z. Maki, M. Nakagawa, and S. Sakata, Prog. Theor. Phys. 28, 870 (1962).
[35] J. N. Bahcall, A. M. Serenelli, and S. Basu, ApJ 621, L85 (2005); e-print
arXiv astro-ph/0412440.
Bibliography 303
[40] O. Q. R. Ahmad et al. [SNO Collaboration], Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 011301
(2002); e-print arXiv nucl-ex/0204008.
[41] S. Abe et al. [KamLAND Collaboration], Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 221803
(2008); e-print arXiv:0801.4589 [hep-ex].
[47] For a full review, see H.Weyl, The Theory of Groups and Quantum Me-
chanics. Dover Publications Inc., New York, 1950.
This page intentionally left blank