Professional Documents
Culture Documents
'#/)'0"*$-
!1#/2"3%45'6)7$"'8)9$
621"&)5'6&$)-&):';)<'6)"$)%:'=2>?'@AB:';2?'CC@D'3E1>?'F:'@GGH4:'II?'CHJC@
K1L>$%/).'L,5'!7)"$&*-'!%%2&$*#$2-'M2"'#/)'!.+*-&)7)-#'2M'6&$)-&)
6#*L>)'NOP5'http://www.jstor.org/stable/3084178
!&&)%%).5'HAQGRQ@GGA'HA5HC
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless
you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you
may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use.
Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at
http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=aaas.
Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed
page of such transmission.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit organization founded in 1995 to build trusted digital archives for scholarship. We work with the
scholarly community to preserve their work and the materials they rely upon, and to build a common research platform that
promotes the discovery and use of these resources. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
American Association for the Advancement of Science is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and
extend access to Science.
http://www.jstor.org
ESSAYS ON SCIENCE AND SOCIETY-
V- ,
. .
. I
Creativity
Charles Darwinarguedin TheOrigin variability have had little social or legal im-
of Species that variability, one of the plications. But when neurobiology starts
chief determinants of evolution, is charting the neurological foundations of
greatest in structures that evolve fastest. In variability,the results will affect profoundly
humans, the brain is the most variable and our social organization at all levels, includ-
fastest evolving organ. We cannot at pres- ing the educational,political, and legal.
ent ascribe this variability to any well-de- If the quirks of humanity that find ex-
fined structure or component in the brain. pression in artistic works are ultimately a
Rather, we infer it through the wide differ- result of the as-yet-unchartedvariability in
ences in, for example, intelligence, sensi- the structureand functioning of the cerebral
tivities, creative abilities, and skills. Art is cortex, so is the variability in how we expe-
one expression of this variability. Its neu- rience art. This is why we normally assign
rological study will therefore elucidate not art to a private, subjective world; its rich-
only the source of one of the richest sub- ness lies in the fact that its power to disturb
jective experiences of which we are capa- and arouse varies between individuals. In so
ble but also the determinants of the vari- doing, we do not acknowledge sufficiently,
ability in its creation and appreciation, and if at all, the extent to which that subjectivity Semir Zeki
hence elucidate one of the most important and variability is based upon a commonali-
characteristics of the human brain. ty. It is commonality that allows us to com- is professorof Neurobiologyat University
Variability confers huge advantages: it municate about art and through art, with or College Londonand cohead of the
enriches our cultures immeasurablyand is a without the use of the written or the spoken Wellcome Departmentof Cognitive
key factor in the furtherevolution of _ Neurology.A Fellowof the RoyalSociety
human societies. Yet, as an evolu- and a memberof the American
tionary imperative, it also exacts a PhilosophicalSociety,he specializesin
high price. It is often the cause of studyingthe visual brain.Recently,he has
serious injustice and marginalizes extended his workto includevisual art,
from society those whose conduct about which he has publishedarticlesand
or inclinations are judged to be de- two books, InnerVisionand LaQuete
viant from the norm. Paradoxically, de I'Essentiel,coauthoredwith the late
this may benefit art and hence con- Frenchpainter,Balthus.
tributeto culturalevolution. Art ren-
ders the destructive, isolating, and
individualizing effects of variability ics. For example, years before the discovery
safe in its pages, canvasses, and of orientation-selective cells* (which re-
scores. Mozart's Don Giovanni sets spond selectively to straight lines and are
to sublime music the life of a lecher widely thought to be the neural "building
and serial rapist who would find no blocks" of form perception), Mondrian, in
respite in the courts. His doom, an- search of "the constant truths concerning
nounced musically in the opening forms," settled on the straight line as the
bars of the opera, is dictated largely -- major feature of his compositions (see the
E by his biological constitution. He Composition in Red,Yellow, and Blue.-Piet Mondrian first figure, this page). The straightline has
< faces that biological destiny with also been used artistically in variable ways
i courage and dignity, as do Racine's incestu- word. Nor do we sufficiently acknowledge by many other painters, including Kazimir
ous Phedre and Shakespeare's Coriolanus, that the almost infinite creative variability Malevitch and Barnett Newman. Similarly,
o who is constitutionally blighted by pride that allows different artiststo create radical- long before the visual motion center of the
o and arrogance. These artistic studies of ly different styles arises out of common brain (area V5) was charted, kinetic artists
z
neurobiological processes. By probing into such as Alexander Calder and Jean Tinguely
the neural basis of art, neurological studies composed works that, in differentways, em-
| The author is in the Department of Cognitive Neurol-
o ogy, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, can help us to understandwhy our creative phasized motion and de-emphasized color
u
UK.E-mail:zeki.pa@ucl.ac.uk abilities and experiences vary so widely. and form. Their compositions were thus ad-
But it can only do so by first charting the mirably suited for stimulating the cells in
*D. H. Hubel, T. N. Wiesel, J. Physiol. (London) 160,
common neural organizationthat makes the V5 and anticipated artistically the physio-
t 106 (1962).
trS. Zeki, Inner Vision: An Exploration of Art and the creation and appreciationof art possible. logical properties of motion-selective cells.
u Brain (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 1999). A beginning in this direction can be This is why I believe that artists are, in a
z tJ. Constable, 10 December 1771, in Discourse. Art made by studying visual art, a productof the sense, neurologists who unknowingly study
5 (No. 4), (1975).
visual brain about which much has been the brainwith techniques unique to them.t
§N. K.Logothetis etal., Curr.Biol. 5, 552 (1995).
learned in the past 25 years. Artists and neu- Visual art contributes to our under-
|iP.Picasso, interview with C. Zevros, Cahiers d'Art,
a 173 (1935). robiologists have both studiedthe perceptual standing of the visual brain because it ex-
b ¶J.Schulz,Art Bull. 58, 366 (1975). commonality that underlies visual aesthet- plores and reveals the brain's perceptual