Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PREPARATION FOR
LABORATORY TESTING
A symposium
presented at the
Seventy-eighth Annual Meeting
AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR
TESTING AND MATERIALS
Montreal, Canada, 22-27 June 1975
,4N~L
~L~/~AMER~CAN SOCIETY FOR TESTING AND MATERIALS
1916 Race Street, Philadelphia, Pa. 19103
qi]|lY
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
(~) BY AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TESTING AND MATERIALS 1976
Library o f Congress Catalog Card Number; 76-704
NOTE
The society is not responsible, as a body,
for the statements and opinions
advanced in this publication.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
Foreword
The symposium on Soil Specimen Preparation for Laboratory Testing
was presented at the Seventy-eighth Annual Meeting of the American
Society for Testing and Materials held in Montreal, Canada, 22-27 June
1975. Committee D-18 on Soil and Rock for Engineering Purposes spon-
sored the symposium. D. A. Sangrey, Cornell University, and R. J.
Mitchell, Queen's University of Kingston, presided as symposium co-
chairmen.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
Related
ASTM Publications
Performance Monitoring for Geotechnical Construction, STP 584 (1975),
$14.00, 04-584000-38
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
A Note of Appreciation
to Reviewers
This publication is made possible by the authors and, also, the un-
heralded efforts of the reviewers. This body of technical experts whose
dedication, sacrifice of time and effort, and collective wisdom in review-
ing the papers must be acknowledged. The quality level of ASTM publica-
tions is a direct function of their respected opinions. On behalf of ASTM
we acknowledge with appreciation their contribution.
A S T M Committee on Publications
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions aut
Editorial Staff
Jane B. Wheeler, Managing Editor
Helen M. Hoersch, Associate Editor
Charlotte E. DeFranco, Senior Assistant Editor
Ellen J. McGlinchey, Assistant Editor
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
Contents
Introduction
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
Transportation, Preparation, and Storage of Frozen Soil Samples
for Laboratory Testing--T. H. W. BAKER 88
Factors Affecting Laboratory Tests on Frozen Soils 89
Frozen Soil Samples 89
Machining and Preparation of Specimens for Testing 97
Rough Cutting Methods 98
Finishing Methods 98
Storage and Protection During Laboratory Testing 104
Conclusions 111
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
Experimental Investigation 171
Fabric Results 178
Compression Test Results 180
Conclusions 190
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
Discussion of Test Results 282
Conclusions 287
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
S T P 5 9 9 - E B/J u n. 1976
Introduction
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed
9
Copyright 1976 byby ASTM International www.astm.org
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
2 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
From the interest shown for this session it is clear that geotechnical
engineers are becoming increasingly sensitive to the problems of rock
engineering and the role of geotechnical engineering methods in solving
rock mechanics problems.
Storage, extrusion, and predrying effects were covered during the
second part of the morning session. The overall conclusion to be drawn
from this group of papers is that there exists a great potential for
change in soil and rock specimens and their measured properties if
samples are handled poorly and stored for long periods of time. Results
from this group of papers have a direct bearing on present ASTM
standard methods and, in some cases, clearly indicate a need for re-
consideration of existing specifications.
Three major topic areas were included in the afternoon session.
Methods for preparing reconstructed loose cohesionless soil specimens
in the laboratory were discussed in the first group of papers. These
specimens were intended for studies of liquefaction potential and similar
large deformation response. This very current subject was of particular
interest to a large part of the symposium audience.
Preparation of compacted soil specimens was a second topic area
dealing with reconstructing soil specimens in the laboratory. Papers in
this part of the symposium were primarily concerned with the problems
of preparing a laboratory specimen which represented the field situation.
As in the case of the second half of the morning session, there were
some direct implications for present ASTM standard methods indicated
in these papers.
The final session of the symposium was appropriately concerned with
recent techniques applied to laboratory preparation of soil specimens.
All of the papers described new equipment or new techniques for
preparing and testing soil specimens. None of the methods described
are presently covered by ASTM standard methods, but it is reasonable
to expect a need for standards in the near future if there is more wide-
spread use of these new techniques.
A number of present ASTM standard methods were included in the
studies reported in this special technical publication. In several cases,
the results of these research studies indicated a need to reconsider the
present specification, or at least some of its details. Whether it is
appropriate to change an existing standard method or add a method is
an important decision which cannot be based on a single research
study; however, users of specifications should be aware of potential
problems even if the specification is not changed. The listing in Table 1
summarizes the papers included in this special technical publication
and the ASTM standard methods to which they apply. Only the major
associations are noted and there are numerous minor specification refer-
ences which have not been included.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
INTRODUCTION 3
D. A . S a n g r e y
Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y.;
symposium co-chairman.
R . J. M i t c h e l l
Queen's University at Kingston, Ontario,
Canada; symposium co-chairman.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
G. Ballivy, ~ B. Ladanyi, 2 a n d D. E. Gill 2
REFERENCE: Ballivy, G., Ladanyi, B., and Gill, D. E., "Effect of Water Saturation
History on the Strength of Low-Porosity Rocks," Soil Specimen Preparation for Labora-
tory Testing, ASTM STP 599, American Society for Testing and Materials, 1976, pp.
4--20.
ABSTRACT: The purpose of the tests described in this paper was to investigate how
the mechanical properties of rock observed in the tests are influenced by the whole satura-
tion history of the specimen prior to testing. Three aspects of the saturation history were
studied in this paper: the effect of drying and resaturating the specimen prior to testing,
the effect of resaturation method, and the effect of the chemical nature of the resaturating
fluid. Three rock types were used in the tests: a gneiss, a cemented sandstone, and a fine
grained limestone. All three rocks had apparent porosities below 2 percent.
Results of triaxial and splitting tests are reported in the paper. One series of specimens
was brought from the site in its natural saturated state and tested without drying while
the others were either air or oven dried and then resaturated prior to testing. The resatura-
tion was performed either by immersing the specimen in water under vacuum, or by
injecting the saturation fluid, under pressure, through a thin channel drilled along the
specimen axis. Either distilled or seawater were used as the resaturating fluid.
The results show that the inclusion of a drying and wetting cycle prior to testing has a
clear overconsolidation effect on the rock behavior, that is, it increases its apparent
strength. On the other hand, the channel saturation technique gives a better saturation
of the specimen and results in a strength decrease. Finally, the results show that the chemi-
cal composition of the saturation fluid has also a significant effect on the measured rock
strength.
The practical conclusion to be drawn from this study is that representative rock
samples, taken in connection with a given project, should, from the moment of coring
until they are tested, be held under environmental conditions that are as close as possible
to those which will prevail after the completion of the project. This implies that no drying
and wetting cycles should be included if they are not expected to occur in practice. If this
condition cannot be met, specimens should be saturated using a natural saturation fluid
and using an efficient saturation technique such as the described axial channel satura-
tion method.
KEY WORDS: soils, rock mechanics, rock sampling, splitting tests, triaxial tests, satura-
tion methods, pore pressure
~Geotechnical engineer, Lalonde, Girouard, Letendre and Associates, Montreal, P.Q.,
Canada.
ZProfessor and associate professor, respectively, Department of Mineral Engineering,
Ecol6 Polytechnique, Montreal, P.Q. Canada.
4
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed
9
Copyright 1976 byby ASTM International www.astm.org
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
BALLIVY ET AL ON LOW-POROSITY ROCKS 5
Testing Equipment
The rock cutting was performed with a circular watercooled diamond
saw blade. Whenever required, the ends of the specimens were ground
flat on a lathe. The specimens were weighed on electronic balances,
and calipers were used to measure their final dimensions.
The oven used for drying the specimens was built in such a way that
the air, heated to 40.5~ as it entered the oven, was forced to circulate
throughout it; the total volume of air in the oven was renewed every
minute.
Resaturation by fluid injection was done with the apparatus shown
schematically in Fig. 1. It consists essentially of a pressure vessel (A),
through the cover of which eight specially prepared specimens can be
connected to eight tubes; these tubes are all connected to a second
pressure vessel (B) which acts as a saturation fluid reservoir. A nitrogen
gas bottle (C) pressurizes, through a regulator, the saturation fluid con-
tained in the vessel (B); this pressurized fluid is injected, by means of
the tubes, through a channel drilled along the axis of each of the
specimens. A second nitrogen gas bottle (D) applies a pressure, also
3 The italic numbers in brackets refer to the list o f references appended to this paper.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
6 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
FIG. l--Apparatus for saturation of rock specimens by radial divergentflow from a central
channel; (a) view of the apparatus; (b) scheme of the saturation system.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
BALLIVY ET AL ON LOW-POROSITY ROCKS 7
psi (2.07 MPa), and in D, 50 psi (0.34 MPa). The photograph in Fig. 1
shows the apparatus just described.
Both a standard testing machine and, more often, a programmable
universal testing machine (Tinius Olsen) were used for loading the speci-
mens to failure. Diametral splitting tests were conducted between rigid
plattens. Triaxial tests were performed in a modified Hock cell, in which
the confining pressure was supplied by a pump (Structural Behavior
Engineering Laboratories, Model 100 LP + 100 P). To test the specimens
which had been resatured by fluid injection, the plattens were modified as
shown in Fig. 2b. As far as the pore pressure is concerned, a nitrogen gas
bottle, combined with a pore fluid reservoir, was used whenever the back
pressure to be maintained during testing was less than 500 psi (3.45 MPa);
otherwise, the back pressure was provided by the pump. Figure 2a is a
photograph of the Hoek cell with modified plattens. Specimen deforma-
tions were measured with electromechanical extensometers, in which
sensors were linear potentiometers. The longitudinal deformation of the
triaxially tested specimens was measured outside the cell; the signal output
by the measuring devices was recorded against the load applied by the
testing machine on a standard X - Y recorder. In the case of the splitting
tests, the changes in both the vertical and the horizontal diameter were
measured and recorded, as for the triaxial tests.
Rock Types
The tests were performed on three types of rocks from various locations
in the province of Quebec.
Charnokite
This is an Archaean granito-gneiss from the Quebec City area.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
8 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
FIG. 2--Hoek's cell with modified plattens; (a) view of the cell and the plattens; (b) modi-
fied bottom platten.
Specimen Preparation
General
All the specimens were prepared from NX (diameter: 2~ in. or 5.38 cm)
core samples. The present study involved two types of samples which
have been cored below the water table.
Saturated Samples--Samples selected were kept immersed in water at
the drilling site and delivered to the laboratory, where they were submitted
to various procedures, including drying and resaturation.
Air-Dried Samples--In the other cases, the samples selected at the
drilling site were kept under ambient conditions and delivered to the
laboratory where they were submitted to various procedures.
In all cases, the core specimens were cut to the desired lengths a short
time after delivery, and the effect of wetting caused by the cooling water
during the cutting was considered insignificant as far as mechanical pro-
perties are concerned.
The control of specimen saturation was made by a periodical weighing.
Usually, a specimen was considered to have reached a given saturation
degree when periodical weighings showed constant weight for at least
three consecutive days.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
BALLIVY ET AL ON LOW-POROSITY ROCKS 9
an in. (1.90 cm) thick. The following groups of specimens were prepared
from the two previously described types of samples (see Table 1).
Triaxial
Group Tension Splitting Tests Compression Tests
Air-Dried Specimens
A 42
AO 9 50
AS 19
AOS 17 97
AOSC 80
AOC 8
Saturated Specimens
S 57
SO 23
SOS 42
Type A, that is, the air-dried samples, and they fall into one of the
following groups:
Group AO--This group is the same as AO, described for specimens
for tensile splitting.
Group AOS--This group is the same as AOS, described for specimens
for tensile splitting.
Group AOSC--The specimens in this group were prepared as were
those in the splitting tests, except that a 89 hole was drilled along each
of their axes for about 80 percent of their length [11]. No cooling fluid
was used during this operation.
Figure 3 shows a specimen into which a hole has been drilled, as
FIG. 3--Specimens with central channel; (a) radially saturated sandstone specimens with
cut fitting, ready for testing; (b) section of a specimen with complete fitting.
described previously. This figure shows also the brass fitting that was
cemented to the collar of the channel, in order to enable the specimen to
be mounted on the resaturation apparatus described previously. This fitting
covers the hole wall for a length equal to about 30 percent the specimen
length, leaving an unlined cylindrical channel in the central portion of
the specimen; the length of this cavity is then about 60 percent of that of
the rock specimen. Figure 3a is a photograph of such a specimen. Note
that the threaded part of the fitting was cut away before testing.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
BALLIVY ET AL ON LOW-POROSITY ROCKS 11
Testing Procedures
Splitting Tests
Specimens were mounted on the testing machine in such a way that the
loading could be performed along two diametrically opposite lines on the
lateral surface o f the disks. The electromechanical extensometers were
then mounted and set to zero. The loading proceeded at such a speed
that the minor principal stress increased at a rate o f 100 psi/s. Tensile
strengths were calculated from the usual formula
2P
To - (1)
nDL
where
To = tensile strength,
P = maximum load applied,
D = diameter of the specimen, and
L = thickness o f the specimen.
Only the tests in which failure started at the center o f the cross section
o f the specimen, and in which failure plane coincided with the loaded
diametrical plane, were considered to be valid.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
12 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
The extensometer was then set to zero, and the specimens were brought
to failure by increasing the axial stress.
Experimental Results
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authoriz
BALLIVY ET AL ON LOW-POROSITY ROCKS 13
I--
z
w
40. ~35~(
LEGEND:
,o] , L,o
20 MPo
3 ksi
EFFECTIVE CONFINING PRESSURE O''5
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
14 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
psi MPa
1500 /
I0
/
A0
bJ
I-
co
I000,
'AOS,
-6
w
I
-4
500-
/ IM P a [ ~ e d l o n
LEGEND
-2 / vol~e
of To ond F~v
0.5%
/ 19 ~ ' ~ - s t a n d o r d deviotion
/ number of tests
, , II,
0 0'5 Ii0 1',5 210 25 per cent
VERTICAL STRAIN 8v = A.~I
I
FIG. 5--Effect of mode o f saturation on splitting tensile strength and failure strain of
Trenton limestone. For the definition o f symbols, see Table 1.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
BALLIVY ET A L O N LOW-POROSITY ROCKS 15
@l To. (29Opsi)
,,o~s,
S , ~e,ts AS
TO= 740psi / on
@ (160psi)
saturated
/4-- samples ~
~ TO = 780psi
(260psi)
SO AO
~ tests on
TO = 1150psi oven dried ID @ TO= 1290psi
(;500 psi) samples (~90psi)
SOS AOS
4--- tests on
TO= 1090psi resaturated
L (280psi) samples 9 (150psi)
FIG. 6--Effect of drying and saturation history on tensile splitting strength To of Trenton
limestone. For the definition of symbols, see Table 1.
/, AOSC j POTSDAMSANDSTONE
psi MPa /
- 400
%,o /
9 AOS(sea water)
-~- 50 /
t,,-
"EOENO
~oo , - -
J ~T~,~"5 =median effective stresses
ioJ ~. R,H.=relotive humidity
l 5 ~ number of tests
J L/~30(016~1 :median water content=0.30%
~ standard devJation=O.16%
/ ,o ~ - ~ - ,-~-=~
O 2 5 4 5 ksi
EFFECTIVE CONFINING PRESSURE 0"5
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
..L
_o
t-
m
TABLE 2--Influence of mode of saturation and composition of pore fluid on the triaxial compression
strength of charnokite.
m
z
Fluid of Saturation "U
1'I
m
Distilled Water Seawater
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
BALLIVY ET AL ON LOW-POROSITY ROCKS 17
AOS and AOSC lines for Trenton limestone. The difference increases
slightly, however, with increasing confining pressure, which is due probably
to an increase in the degree of saturation because of increasing consolidation
of the rock under confining pressure.
3. For an intermediate saturation in a 75 percent relative humidity
atmosphere [12], the strengths are located, as expected, between those of
dry and completely saturated specimens. However, for the reason outlined
previously, there is a tendency for consolidation under a high confining
pressure to increase the degree of saturation; this leads to an apparent
decrease of strength at higher pressures.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
--L
Go
oo
0
r
LEGEND : (I)
"o
m
(~ DISTILLEDWATER o_
8 days 21 doys 42doys AOSC ~ SEA WATER m
z
water 1)
:TJ
content
I
t" m
-o
),
2% AOS~ ~ D,ST,LLEDWATE~
>
SEA WATER -t
5
z
( 8 ) : 8 TESTS
"11
02D
'~176 I
j J loo Isl ffJ
0
0 . . . . . . . . . [o.tT(e) - - -
1 0
-n
-<
TIME OF SATURATION m
.-~
FIG. 8--Variation o f water content with time o f saturation in charnokite specimens, using two different saturation techniques: A O S =
air dried, oven dried, resaturated; A O S C = air dried, oven dried, saturated through a central hole. if)
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
BALLIVY ET AL ON LOW-POROSITY ROCKS 19
Conclusions
This experimental investigation shows that the specimen preparation
history has a great influence on the strength of ordinary rocks o f low
porosity. Three factors affecting strength have been identified: the oven
drying, the final water content, and the chemical composition of pore
water.
In particular, oven drying leads to an irreversible overconsolidation
effect, which may be due to a modification in the structure of hydrosili-
cates, resulting in petrification o f bonds. On the other hand, an ordinary
air drying at 60 to 70~ and a relative humidity o f less than 45 per-
cent has a much smaller overconsolidation effect, as found in the tension
splitting tests. This means that, for ordinary rock testing purposes, air
drying with subsequent resaturation may be acceptable, but oven drying
should be avoided.
The water content o f rock at failure was found to be an important
factor in determining its strength. Since the water content attained by
radial flow and back pressure through a central channel can be up to five
times higher than that after a simple immersion of the specimen, it is not
sufficient to indicate only that the specimen was saturated during the
test; its water content at failure should also be identified. In general, it is
clear that the results closest to reality will be obtained if the specimens
are tested at their natural, or maximum expected, water content, without
being subjected to drying prior to testing.
Finally, these results show that even small amounts o f chemicals in the
pore water, such as the salts in the seawater, may affect the strength o f
rock considerably. This result indicates that using distilled water for rock
saturation is not always the best method for finding its expected strength.
Acknowledgments
The experimental work described in this paper was carried out at the
Rock Mechanics Laboratory o f Ecole Polytechnique, Montreal, and was
supported by the National Research Council of Canada Grants 1801 and
3412.
References
[1] Robinson, L. H., Quarterly of the Colorado School of Mines, Vol. 54, No. 3, July
1959, pp. 177-200.
[2] Colback, P. S. B. and Wiid, B. L. in Proceedings, Third Canadian Symposium Rock
Mechanics, Toronto, 1965, pp. 65-83.
[3] Wild, B. L., "The Influenceof Moisture upon the Strength Behaviourof Rock," Ph.D.
thesis, Universityof the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa, 1967.
[4] Morlier, P., "R61e des Fluides en M~canique des Roches," Proceedings of the 2nd
Congress of the International Societyof Rock Mechanics, Belgrade, 1970.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
20 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
[5] Mellor, M., "Strength and Deformabifity of Rocks at Low Temperatures," Research
Report 294, U.S. Army Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory, Hanover,
N.H., 1971.
[6] Chenevert, M. E., in Rock Mechanics-Theory and Practice, W. H. Somerton, Ed.,
Society of Mining Engineers of The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and
Petroleum Engineers, New York, 1970, pp. 599-627.
[7] Clark, T. H., "Montreal Area," Geological Report 152, Minist~re des Richesses
Naturelles, Qu6bec, 1972.
[8] Durand, M., "Etude de propri~t~s Physiques et Chimiques de Calcaires de la R6gion de
Montreal," Thb,se M.Sc.A., Ecole Polytechnique de Montr~.al, Montr6al, Qu6bec, 1969.
[9] Heck, W. J. in Basic and Applied Rock Mechanics, K. E. Gray, Ed., Society of Mining
Engineers of The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers,
New York, 1972, pp. 243-266.
[16] Robinson, L. H., on Quarterly of the Colorado School of Mines, Vol. 54, No. 3,
July 1959, pp. 177-200.
[11] Bernaix, J. Etude G~otechnique de la Roche de Malpasset, Dunod, Paris, 1967.
[12] Dunn, J. R. and Hudec, P. P., "The Influence of Clays on Water and Ice in Rock
Pores," Part II, Physical Research Report RR 65-5, Department of Public Works,
State of New York, 1965.
[13] Brace, W. F. and Martin, R. J., III, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and
Mineral Science, Vol. 5, No. 5, Sept. 1968, pp. 415-426.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
P. G. Chamberlain, ~ E. M. Van Eeckhout, 2
and E. R. Podnieks'
REFERENCE: Chamberlain, P. G., Van Eeckhout, E. M., and Podnieks, E. R., "Four
Factors Influencing Observed Rock Properties," Soil Specimen Preparation for Labora-
tory Testing, ASTM STP 599, American Society for Testing and Materials, 1976, pp.
21-36.
ABSTRACT: This paper presents a review of the effects of four factors in specimen
preparation that influence mechanical property tests--moisture content, orientation
with respect to rock fabric, fractures, and specimen tolerances--and discusses methods
developed during various Bureau of Mines testing programs for controlling these factors.
Bureau and other research is cited to present problems in obtaining suitable property
data arising from these factors and to define solutions to the problems. Rock mechanics
researchers dealing with field sampling and laboratory testing should find the material
helpful in establishing specimen handling and preparation procedures for obtaining
relevant test results.
KEY WORDS: soils, rocks, rock properties, specimen preparation, laboratory tests,
moisture content
21
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed
Copyright9 1976 by by ASTM International www.astm.org
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
22 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
M o i s t u r e Con ten t
There is little doubt that moisture content affects the mechanical properties
of various rock types, sedimentary rocks in particular [1-5] .3 This effect is
usually a lowering of strength with increased moisture, as well as an increase
in mechanical compliances in certain rocks. For example, Table 1 shows how
Relative
Relative Relative Young's
Source Humidity, ~ Strength a Modulus ~
"All specimens compressed paraUd to bedding; values represent average o f two to six tests.
strength and Young's modulus values for coal mine shales varied after stabili-
zation at three humidities [3]. Further examples are shown in Figs. 1,2, and 3.
It follows that, if meaningful data are to be obtained in the laboratory, sam-
ples should not lose or gain water in transit from the field. Care must be taken
also in the laboratory to prevent changes in moisture content during storage
and specimen preparation.
Many methods are available for stabilizing water content in samples trans-
ported from the field to the laboratory. The methods range from waxing the
sample to enclosing it in airtight steel drums [6] or dipping in cellulose ace-
tate butyrite [7]. The Bureau of Mines has encased some large coal samples
in concrete, but the shrinkage characteristics of certain cements make this
potentially harmful for structurally weak specimens. Although plastic
bags are the easiest sealant to use, they are difficult to seal and tend to rip
easily. During a recent coal sampling trip to Illinois, representative samples
3 The italic numbers in brackets refer to the list o f references appended to this paper.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
CHAMBERLAIN ET AL ON OBSERVED ROCK PROPERTIES 23
9,000 - - 1 I i I- -
~ Dried
8,000
Sandstone
7,000
9~ 6,000
c~
E
z 5,000
~E
o 5,000
~ idity
Sample 1 0 0 5 / 7
Submerged
in water
50 pct relative [
2,000 humidity as zero
datum
1,0OO
0 I I I I
-2.0 O 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0
MOISTURE CONTENT, wf-pct
of coal wrapped in plastic bags lost 1 percent in weight during three days
transportation to Minnesota. This weight was regained upon placing the
coal in a 100 percent relative humidity chamber. Such weight changes
vary, of course, with initial moisture content and climatic conditions dur-
ing transportation. If convenient, it is best to coat samples with wax or
other vapor sealant.
Once the samples have been transported to the laboratory, the question
of storage until specimen preparation arises. If there is a good vapor sealant
on the samples, there is no problem unless the sealant cracks. Samples without
a proper sealant should be stored at a humidity which maintains the as-col-
lected moisture content in the rock, as evidenced by weight measurements.
The samples can be stored in an enclosure where the air above a saturated
salt solution is stabilized at the desired humidity (see Winston and Bates [8]
for a list of possible chemicals) or in an enclosure containing the proper mix-
ture of wet and dry air [9]. A problem arises if the equilibrium humidity for
maintaining the original moisture content is not known for a given rock.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
24 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
20,000 I I I I I I I I
Z
W
CE
I0,000 §
x x
0.
oo 5,000
I I I I I I I I I
0 I0 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 I O0
RELATIVE HUMIDITY, pct
LATERAL STRAIN, / = i n / i n
0 5 O0 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500
5,000 ! I 1 I
~" 3,000
2,000
/," S" / ; / ' ..::.-' . / y . ..,s;-'
/,'/s/ - ~anderasa._d,,on.
,/I J ' ..,:.S,-"
I,OCO
~ "S~ I I I
0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000
AXIAL STRAIN, /=in/in
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
CHAMBERLAIN ET AL ON OBSERVED ROCK PROPERTIES 25
100 0.0
78 1.2
48 5.0
12 6.3
0 6.8
Orientation
Although it has been well established that mechanical properties of
rock vary with specimen orientation [10-12], many engineers still do not
realize the importance of preparing test specimens properly oriented with
respect to geologic structure to obtain valid test results. Rock property
anisotropy was demonstrated in one study [13] which showed that com-
pressive strength of granites varied approximately 20 percent, while
Young's modulus varied up to 100 percent with direction (Fig. 4). An-
other study [3] showed that Young's modulus of coal mine shale was 30
to 80 percent higher whenspecimens were loaded parallel to the bedding
rather than perpendicular to it. Tensile strength results varied several
hundred percent with direction for shales and other layered sedimentary
rocks [14] (Fig. 5). Indirect tensile strength of coal varied threefold with
different orientations in the horizontal plane [15]. Shear strength of a
schistose gneiss, as determined from confining pressure tests (triaxial com-
pression tests), varied significantly as a function of direction [16] (Fig. 6).
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
26 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
800 / I I e i
~-i.iL-_-4 ..... I I i
O 500 I ,OOO 1,5OO 2,000 2,500
AXIAL STRAIN, Fin/in
2,000 [ I I I I I I
Idaho
pS p r i n q s
gneiss
r I
Green River
1,500 Pshole (rich)
Green River
shale (leon)
Z
1,000 Sandstone
Z
tAi
p-
500 Blockhowk
.____._x/-'x "X-
i
,.
15
I
30
I
45
I
60 75
I
90
I I
105
I
120
INCLINATION OF LAYERING TO ~3' de?
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
CHAMBERLAIN ET AL ON OBSERVED ROCK PROPERTIES 27
o"3
T
15 J f I l J t i i I
-,r
i-
w
i1c
oc
O 30 60 90
/~'-SCHISTOSITY ANGLE, (:leg
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
28 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
FIG. 7--Stereonet plots of principal velocity and mechanicalproperty directionsfor shale [3].
Fractures
The fact that rock is cracked or fractured has long caused consternation
to people attempting to characterize a rock mass using laboratory property
tests. Fractures or joints can provide a domineering influence on rock
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
CHAMBERLAIN ET AL ON OBSERVED ROCK PROPERTIES 29
,51
fractures during transit (Fig. 8). Where it is of interest to preserve the
w
E
20
II Before shipment
Eg After shipment
~ 5
2
I
to to
4
4
to
5
5
to
6
6
to
7
?
to
8
8
to
9
to
I0
l
I0
to
Id
ll ll n
II 12 13 14 15 16
to to to to to to
12 13 I~ 15 16 17
CORE PIECE LENGTH, in
,
17 18 19 20
to to to to
18 19 2 0 21
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized
30 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
pallets placed on old tires or other shock absorbent materials in the truck
bed.
Specimens prepared from the collected samples should be large enough
to include a unit cell or one repetition of the fracture pattern as measured
during the geologic reconnaissance. If this would produce a specimen too
large for available testing systems, specimens must be cut as large as feasi-
ble from selected locations in the sample that will provide realistic charac-
terization of the site.
If a desirable specimen size cannot be determined by examining frac-
tures, preliminary tests can be run on various size specimens. Strength and
moduli decrease generally with increased specimen size up to a size con-
taining a representative fracture system [26-28]. The size above which the
properties measured in the preliminary tests do not change, if the size
range includes that specimen containing a representative fracture distribution,
would then be the desired specimen size for the testing program.
Fracture separation is frequently a problem during specimen preparation.
Generally, larger specimens are less prone to separation along fracture
planes than are small specimens. Careful attention must be given to specimen
preparation details such as drilling or cutting speed, torque, flushing fluid
flow etc. to minimize vibrations and reduce stresses induced in specimens
during the preparation process. Structural integrity of specimens with a
tendency to separate can be maintained sometimes with a thin " b e a d " of
cement along one side. Although tension tests cannot be run on such speci-
mens, triaxial or uniaxial compression test results are not affected signifi-
cantly by the cement.
Material that is very friable--coal for example--can sometimes be cut
from original samples with a bandsaw, thus minimizing separation of pre-
existing fractures by eliminating the torques associated with coting. Sawing
specimens with an appropriate bandsaw blade can be done without water
coolant, thereby preventing undue damage to cracks filled with water solu-
ble minerals or clays. Casting rough blocks of coal in concrete or hydro-
stone before sawing helps prevent damage during cutting also.
Where a testing program is being conducted for theoretical studies of
rock behavior, precautions must be taken to ensure that all specimens are
similar. This uniformity can be accomplished by testing specimens with:
(1) no flaws; (2) similar natural fracture distributions; or (3) uniform in-
duced fracture systems. Flawless specimens are obtained by drilling slender
cores and discarding those segments containing fractures. Commercially
available dye-penetrant flaw detecting techniques can be used to find de-
fects not otherwise visible [9]. Obtaining specimens that all contain similar
natural fracture distributions is difficult, especially since no acceptable
method exists for judging their similarity. Generally, a rock sample con-
taining a uniform fracture system throughout is selected; identically oriented
specimens are then prepared from this sample. Care must be taken while
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
CHAMBERLAIN ET AL ON OBSERVED ROCK PROPERTIES 31
~Frocture
FIG. 9--Preparingspecimenscontainingfractures.
intact specimens beyond the peak load, inducing a fracture regime in the
specimen, then to remove the load before complete loss of cohesion. Subse-
quent testing can then be performed on the fractured specimen.
Specimen Tolerances
Failure to adhere to prescribed specimen tolerances during specimen
preparation can yield misleading test results. Excessive side roughness, end
roughness, end parallelism, and end perpendicularity to the core axis (or
sides if prismatic specimens are used) can all cause problems (Fig. 10).
End roughness greater than 0.001 in. can create nonuniform stresses near
the ends and decrease the apparent strength of the specimen [30] (Fig. 11).
Ends which are not parallel to each other or perpendicular to the core axis
within 0.25 deg can also alter the apparent strength and deformation
moduli [9,30]. Figure 12, for example, shows affects of excessive end inclina-
tion on typical load-deformation curves. Side roughness becomes important
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
32 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
I1 II
End porollelism End inclination
l
End roughness Side roughness
because stress concentrations may develop along rough sides and because
it creates difficulties in preparing the ends parallel and perpendicular to
the axis. ASTM Test for Unconfined Compressive Strength of Rock Core
Specimens (D 2938-71), Test for Direct Tensile Strength of Rock Core
Specimens (D 2936-71), Test for Triaxial Compressive Strength of Undrained
Rock Core Specimens Without Pore Pressure Measurement (D 2664-67),
Test for Flexural Strength of Concrete (Using Single Beam With Third-
Point Loading) (C 78-67), and the Bureau guidelines [31] spell out accept-
able specimen tolerances.
Adherance to nominal dimensions is generally not critical. Gross changes
in length-to-diameter ratios (L/D) can, however, make significant differences
in property test results due to end constraint [26] (Fig. 13). Hawkes and
MeUor [32], after surveying a variety of studies on length-to-diameter ratio
effects, have recommended a L / D of 2.5.
For competent rock types, it is fairly easy to circumvent problems of
poor specimens. If cylindrical specimens are desired, cores can be ground
on their cylindrical surface to remove side roughness. It is then simple to
clamp the cores in a V-block to surface grind the rough-sawn ends parallel
to each other and perpendicular to the core axis. Lapping techniques are
not acceptable, due to the complete lack of control on end parallelism and
perpendicularity to the core axis. Prismatic specimens can be machined
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized
CHAMBERLAIN ET AL ON OBSERVED ROCK PROPERTIES 33
48 I 0 i I I
8o
o 0 0
o
0
0
Granite
4O
0 0
0
,,
Q.
32
I..- 0
z
~ 24 ic~
Q
000
0 0
p- I ~ So ndsto~ne
0
00
w 0
Marble A
0 A
(..)
8
0 ~:~Limestone O0 0
T y p i c a l end s u r f a c e
texture variation
measurement
Sm t _ Medium ..L Rough
r 7-
i I
I I I
o 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000
W, END SURFACE TEXTURE VARIATION, /=in
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
34 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
d
o<25 5
~ 2o 4
0(-2= .35' 3
~ ~o 2 (Z = 53 ~
g
~ 5 I
x
< 0 5.0 I0.0 15.0 O 5.0 IO.O 150
AXIAL DEFORMATION. IO-3 m
~ 1.6 I I | I I I I I
b
-.r
I-
o'CN = c o m p r e s s i v e strencjth normalize?
~ 1.4
I-
~ 1.2
~ 1.0
O
r
N .8
..J
I I I I I I I I I
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 I .0 1.2 1.4 1,6 1.8 2.0
L/D, lencjth-to-diam ratio
Summary
The increased use of computer modeling in the design of openings in
rock and foundations on rock has made it more and more important to
know relevent and accurate rock properties. From the time of sampling a
field site to the completion of property tests on the rock in the laboratory,
many factors in specimen handling may alter their apparent properties.
Moisture content, orientation, crack or fracture occurrence, and specimen
tolerances are four factors that need to be considered in any laboratory
testing program. The negative influences of these factors can be minimized,
however, by giving careful attention to sampling, transporting, storing, and
preparing specimens.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
CHAMBERLAIN ET AL ON OBSERVED ROCK PROPERTIES 35
References
[1] Colback, P. S. B. and Wild, B. L. in Proceedings, 3rd Canadian Symposium on Rock
Mechanics, 1965, pp. 65-83.
[2] Parker, J., Transactions, Society of Mining Engineers, American Institute of Mining,
Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers, Vol. 247, June 1970, pp. 142-144.
[3] Van Eeckhout, E. M., "The Effect of Moisture on the Mechanical Properties of Coal
Mine Shales," P h . D . thesis, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minn., Dec. 1974.
[4] Aughenbaugh, N. B. and Bruzewski, R. F., "Investigation of the Failure of Roofs in
Coal Mines," Final Report on Bureau of Mines Contract HOI 11462, Oct. 1973.
[5] Mann, R. L. and Fatt, I., Geophysics, Vol. 25, No. 2, April 1960, pp. 433-444.
[6] "Recommended Practice for Core-Analysis Procedure," API RC 40, American Pe-
troleum Institute, 1960.
[7] Oitto, R., Zona, A., and Stears, J., Coal Mining and Processing, Vol. 7, No. 12, Dec.
1970.
[8] Winston, P. W. and Bates, D. H., Ecology, Vol. 41, No. 1, 1960, pp. 232-237.
[9] Podnieks, E. R., Chamberlain, P. G., and Thill, R. E. in Proceedings, 10th Symposium
on Rock Mechanics, Austin, Tex., 20-22 May 1968, American Institute of Mining,
Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers, pp. 215-241.
[10] McGill, E. and Raney, J. A., Geological Society o f America Bulletin, Vol. 81, Oct.
1970, pp. 2949-2958.
[ll] Hock, E., South African Institute Mining and Metallurgy Journal, Vol. 64, No. 10, 1964,
pp. 510-518.
[12] Jaeger, J. C., GeologicalMagazine, Vol. 97, 1960, pp. 65-72.
[13] Douglass, P. M. and Voight, B., Geotechnique, Vol. 9, No. 3, 1968, pp. 376-398.
[14] Youash, Y., Geological Society of America Bulletin, Vol. 80, Feb. 1969, pp. 303-306.
[15] Komar, C. A., Overbey, W. K., Jr., and Pasini, J., III, "Directional Properties of Coal
and Their Utilization in Underground Gasification Experiments," Technical Progress
Report 73, Bureau of Mines, Nov. 1973.
[16] Deklotz, E. J. and Brown, J. W., "Tests for Strength Characteristics of a Schistose
Gneiss, Mechanical Anisotropy," Technical Report 1-67, Department of Army, Missouri
River Division, Corps of Engineers, Omaha, Neb., May 1967.
[17] Steckley, R. C., Podnieks, E. R., Chamberlain, P. G., and Pugliese, J. M. in Field
Testing and Instrumentation of Rock, ASTM STP 554, American Society for Testing
and Materials, 1974, pp. 100-115.
[18] McWilliams, J. R. in Testing Techniques for Rock Mechanics, ASTM STP 402, Ameri-
can Society for Testing and Materials, 1966, pp. 175-189.
[19] Vickers, B. L. and Thill, R. E., Journal of Science Instruments, Series 2, Vol. 2 Oct.
1969, pp. 901-902.
[20] Thill, R. E., Willard, R. J., and Bur, T. R., Journal o f Geophysical Research, Vol.
74, No. 20, Sept. 1969, pp. 4897-4909.
[21] Mogilevskanza, S. E. M. in Proceedings, 2nd Congress of the International Society for
Rock Mechanics, Vol. 1, Privredni pregled, Belgrade, Yugoslavia, 1970, pp. 333-339.
[22] Lane, K. S. and Heck, W. J. in Proceedings, 6th Symposium on Rock Mechanics,
University of Missouri-Rolla, 1964, pp. 98-108.
[23] ErgQn, I. in Proceedings, 2nd Congress of International Society for Rock Mechanics,
Vol. 1, Privredni preglad, Belgrade, Yugoslavia, 1970, pp. 497-507.
[24] Brown, E. T., Journal ofSoilMechanics, Vol. 96, No. SM6, Dec. 1970, pp. 1935-1949.
[25] Einstein, H. H., Nelson, R. A., Bruhn, R. W., and Hirshfeld, R. C. in Rock Mechanics
Theory and Practice, Proceedings, l l t h Symposium on Rock Mechanics, New York,
American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers, 1970, pp. 83-103.
[26] Obert, L., Windes, S. L., and Duvall, W. I., "Standardized Tests for Determining the
Physical Properties of Mine Rock," Report of Investigations 3891, Bureau of Mines,
1946.
[27] Bieniawski, Z. T. in Proceedings, 10th Symposium on Rock Mechanics, American
Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers, 1972, pp. 409-427.
[28] Dhir, R. K. and Sangha, C. M., Colliery Guardian, VoL 220, No. 1, Jan. 1972, pp.
75-78.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
36 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
[29] Wawersik, W. R. and Brown, W. S., "Creep Fracture of Rock," University of Utah
Report, UTC-ME 73-197, Final Report on Bureau of Mines Contract HO220007, July
1973.
[30] Hoskins, J. R. and Horino, F. G., "Effect of End Conditions on Determining Com-
pressive Strength of Rock Samples," Report of Investigations 7171, Bureau of Mines,
1968.
[31] "Bureau of Mines Test Procedures for Rocks," Information Circular 8628, U.S. Bureau
of Mines, 1974, pp. 120-126.
[32] Hawkes, I. and MeUor M., Engineering Geology, Vol. 4, No. 3, July 1970, pp. 177-285.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
G. N . D u r h a m I
REFERENCE: Durham, G. N., "Trimming Device for Obtaining Direct Shear Spec-
imens from Samples of Stiff Fissured Clay Shale," Soil Specimen Preparation for Labo-
ratory Testing, ASTM STP 599, American Society for Testing and Materials, 1976,
pp. 37-42.
ABSTRACT: A device has been developed at the U. S. Army Engineer Waterways Exper-
iment Station for obtaining direct shear specimens of hard, brittle soils, the use of which
has resulted in a reduction in man-hours for specimen preparation from 3 or 4 h to 50 or
60 min per specimen. This device, which has proved to be superior to any previous ap-
paratus used for obtaining direct shear specimens of such soils, is fitted to the base of a
commercially available unconfined compression apparatus of the hand-operated type.
Samples found untrimmable heretofore can now be tested, because a sample is held
rigidly during trimrning operations, and the time of exposure to air drying (and sub-
sequent deterioration) has been reduced substantially.
KEY WORDS: soils, soil tests, shear properties, clays, shales, residual stress
37
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed
Copyright9 1976 by by ASTM International www.astm.org
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
38 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
DURHAM ON SHEAR SPECIMENS OF STIFF FISSURED CLAY SHALE 39
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
40 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
Specimen Preparation
A horizontal slice of soil, approximately ~ in. (3.2 mm) thicker than the
desired final height and approximately 388 by 388 in. (77.8 by 77.8 mm)
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
DURHAM ON SHEAR SPECIMENS OF STIFF FISSURED CLAY SHALE 41
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
42 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
block removed; wall friction prevents the specimen from moving. The piston
is then brought into contact with the specimen and moved upward until the
upper surface of the soil extends slightly above the specimen holder. The
excess soil above the specimen holder is removed with a hardened steel straight-
edge (Fig. 2b). The cutter blade is disconnected from the specimen holder,
which, in turn, is removed from the stanchions and fastened inverted to a
89 (12.7-mm)-thick machined steel plate. The excess material from the
bottom surface is then removed (Figs. 2c and d), the sides of the specimen
holder are disconnected, and the specimen is placed in the shear box for test-
ing.
Discussion
Use of the WES direct shear trimming device has resulted in a reduction in
man-hours for preparation from 3 to 4 h to 50 to 60 min per specimen. Sam-
ples heretofore found untrimmable can now be tested for residual strength
parameters because the sample is held rigidly during trimming operations and
the time of exposure to air drying (and subsequent deterioration) has been
reduced substantially.
Acknowledgment
Acknowledgment is made to W. J. Hughes, civil engineer technician, and
J. P. Wislocki, mechanical engineer, both of the WES, for their significant
contributions in the development and design of the WES direct shear trim-
ming device. The author wishes to thank M. L. Doiron for her editorial review
of this paper and K. M. Jennings, who typed and assembled the paper.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
F. C. Townsend' and P. A. Gilbert'
KEY WORDS: clays, shales, residual shear stress, direct shear tests, annular shear
tests, soils
43
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed
Copyright9 1976 by by ASTM International www.astm.org
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
44 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
Previous Investigations
Equipment
The repeated direct shear method using conventional apparatus was de-
veloped by Skempton [4] and has been adapted as a uniform procedure by
the Corps of Engineers. This method involves shearing the specimen a
limited distance in one direction and then either reversing the direction o f
shear or relieving the normal load and pushing the movable half o f the
shear box back to its initial position before shearing again. These opera-
tions are repeated until sufficient displacements are accumulated to reach
a residual condition. A characteristic stepped displacement-shear stress
curve is produced in which the succeeding peaks are due to particle reorienta-
tion or to the formation of new slip planes with each cycle. 3 The less com-
mon ring torsion method was used first in the 1930's by early investigators
[5,6]. The method provides continuous displacements in one direction of
an annular specimen; this feature is desirable in research evaluation of
residual strength [3,4, 7].
Specimen Type
A general agreement exists in the literature [3,8] that residual shear
strength is independent of stress history and that the alignment o f clay
particles in a failure zone o f remolded material controls the value o f +r '
Consequently, three basic specimen types, (a) intact, (b) precut, and (c) re-
sedimented or remolded-reconsolidated, are being tested by various labora-
tories. Testing on intact specimens o f clay shale poses several problems,
2The italic numbers in brackets refer to the list of referencesappended to this paper.
3Skempton himself recognizedthat the method was imperfect and suggested that ideally
the displacement should be continuouslyin one direction, as occurs in field situations.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
TOWNSEND AND GILBERT ON CLAYS AND CLAY SHALES 45
namely, (a) preventing slippage between the specimen and torque plate
and (b) having equipment capable of applying high shearing stresses to
initially shear the material and yet sensitive enough to measure low residual
strengths. As a result of these difficulties and Skempton's [9] observation
that precutting ensures the lowest shearing resistance and most conserva-
tive result, the present trend in testing clay shales is to use precut specimens.
Alternatively, since any effects of stress history of the sample on +r ' are
obliterated by the remolding action occurring in and along the failure zone,
the use of remolded samples offers another method for specimen prepara-
tion in residual strength testing. Tiedermann [5], Skempton [4], and Petley
[7] demonstrated that the residual strength of clays normally consolidated
from a slurry was equivalent to that of undisturbed overconsolidated clay.
Materials
Various clay shales from foundations at Corps of Engineers' projects
were tested using repeated direct shear, annular shear, and rotational shear
equipment and techniques. These were:
(a) Dawson shale, Chatfield Dam, South Platte River, Colorado,
(b) Taylor I shale, Laneport Dam, San Gabriel River, Texas,
(c) Strawn shale, Proctor Dam, Leon River, Texas,
(d) Kincaid shale, Cooper Dam, Sulphur River, Texas,
(e) Bearpaw shale, Fort Peck Dam, Missouri River, Montana, and
(1") Pierre shale, Oahe Dam, Missouri River, South Dakota.
Since shearing an intact specimen of clay shale by annular shear equip-
ment is virtually impossible, the effects of precutting and compacted density
were evaluated on softer materials. These were:
(a) Residual clay, Volta Grande, Brazil,
(b) Micaceous silty sand, Rio Paraibuna, Brazil, and
(c) Micaceous silty sand, Rio Paraitinga, Brazil.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
46 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
TABLE 1--Classification indexes of clay shales and clays tested for this study.
Activity
Plasticity
Processing Liquid Plastic Plasticity <2/am, Index
Material Method" Limit Limit Index % <2/am, ~
Equipment
The apparatus used for determining the residual shear strength of the
shales consisted of an annular shear device, a repeated direct shear
machine, and a rotational shear machine. Brief descriptions of the equip-
ment follow.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
TOWNSEND AND GILBERT ON CLAYS AND CLAY SHALES 47
Specimen Preparation
Testing of clay shale materials was conducted either on specimens of
intact material with precut failure planes or on specimens composed of
remolded material. Specimens with precut failure planes were prepared by
separately trimming the top and bottom specimen halves from the shale
cores and placing them in confining rings or shear boxes. These specimen
halves were then placed in their respective shearing devices (annular shear
4Construction or modificationwas accomplished at the WaterwaysExperiment Station
under the generalsupervisionof B. N. Maclver.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
48 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
TOWNSEND AND GILBERT ON CLAYS AND CLAY SHALES 49
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
T A B L E 2--Summary o f residual shear strength tests on clay shales, tl~
0
Residual Displacement per
r
Normal Rate of Shear Stage Required to o
Stress, Displacement, Strength, Achieve ~r ', cmb r"
Shale/Test Test Type~ kg/cm 2 cm/day ~r ', deg (not cumulative) Comments r
-o
m
Dawson
ASI3 AS 6.1 1.75 5.7 cyclic annular shear tests;
m
sample sheared for 1.75 cm in z
one direction; normal load -u
removed and sample manu-
ally returned to initial starting m
-u
point
6.1 1.75 4.9 38.4 continuous annular shear, one
direction --4
5
DS-16 RDS 6.0 1.163 4.9 8.5 Z
6.0 0.593 4.6 4.8 "11
0
RS
H A 316 undried 6.0 69 7.3 73.1
W
H A 310 air dried 6.0 ~ 7.0 31.9 0..n
H A 288 blenderized 6.0 ~ 6.8 19.5 -t
0
Taylor I .<
AS-20 AS 6.1 1.75 12.8 13.0 residual was not yet achieved -t
6.1 14.03 10.6 61.0 residual was not yet achieved m
12.1 1.75 10.6 0.5 .-t
12.1 14.03 11.7 13.0
0
3.1 1.75 10.3 11.3
3.1 14.03 8.8 68.3
1.6 1.75 8.6 0.2 residual was not yet achieved
1.6 14.03 8.2 35.4
1.6 1.75 8.3 3.3
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
DS-17 RDS 6.0 1.16 9.6 33.0
12.0 1.16 10.3 10,0
H A 285 RS, blenderized 6.0 69 9.8 20.9 tests on material prepared by
undried and air-dried proce-
dures could not be conduc-
ted as peak strengths over- -4
loaded force transducers O
Strawn Z
AS-23 AS 6.1 1.75 8.2 1.7 residual not achieved prior to m
6.1 14.03 8.5 17.1 increase in rate of displace- z
o
6.1 1.75 8.7 1.5 ment
12.1 1.75 1.7 peak not achieved prior to in- z
12.1 14.03 9.5 18.5 crease in displacement rate o
12.1 1.75 9.5 1.7
3.1 1.75 10.0 3.9 residual not achieved prior to F
3.1 14.03 9.3 37.7 increase in rate of displace- ~0
m
3,1 1,75 9.3 3.3 ment 30
-4
1,6 1.75 9.3 5.3
1.6 14.03 9.2 28.0 o
Z
1.6 1.75 9.4 5.0
0r'-
DS-5 RDS 6.0 0.59 9.2 3.0
12.0 0.59 9.8 0.35
RS
H A 323 undried 6.0 69 9.6 91,2 z
Kincald -r
AS-25 AS 1.6 1.75 14.6 2.0 residual not developed prior to f-
1.6 14.03 5.7 58.4 increase in rate of displace- m
co
1.6 1.75 5.5 3.4 ment
3.1 1.75 5.3 12.6
Grl
3.1 14.03 5.0 28.0 =,.k
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
T A B L E 2--Summary o f residual shear strength tests on clay shales--Continued, t.~
CopyrightbyASTMInt'l(allrightsreserved);WedDec2214:00:00EST2010
Downloaded/printedby
UniversityofBritishColumbiaLibrarypursuanttoLicenseAgreement.Nofurtherreproductionsauthorized.
DS-10 RDS 6.0 0.59 6.3 15.7 0.75 N solution of NazSO4 used
12,0 0.59 6.2 3.6 as saturating fluid
H A 197 RS, air dried 6.0 69.0 5.0 8.6
RS, blenderized
with distilled
water 6.0 69.0 4.7 15.0
H A 222 RS, blenderized
in 0.75 N Z
Na2SO4 6.0 69.0 6.4 8.9
m
Z
Pierre shale
low plasticity
AS-28 AS 6.1 1.75 7.0 21.0 Z
6.1 14.03 7.1 43.0
6.1 1.75 6.9 1.2
12.1 1.75 8.8 peak not achieved prior to in- 0o
12.1 14.03 10,4 62.8 crease in displacement rate m
~D
12.1 1.75 10.2 4.1 .-I
6.1 1.75 7.7 5.3
0
6.1 14.03 8.3 68.5 Z
6.1 1.75 7.8 4.2 0
3.1 1.75 8.1 33.3
3.1 14.03 8.6 5.0
3.1 1.75 7.5 1.7
DS-12 RDS 6.0 0.59 7.1 25.7 Z
12.0 0.59 7,1 2.4
0
high plasticity
AS-29 AS 6.1 1.75 3.0 12.2
12.1 1.75 3.6 2.3
12.1 14.03 3.8 41.7 I
12.1 1.75 4.0 1.2 f-
6.1 1.75 3.7 1.7 ro
6.1 14.03 3.5 30.2
6.1 1.75 3.5 6.1
O1
3.1 1.75 3.7 3.5
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
01
0~
O
I"
fD
T A B L E 2--Summary o f residual shear strength tests on clay shales--Continued. "U
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
TOWNSEND AND GILBERT ON CLAYS AND CLAY SHALES 55
Residual Displacement
Normal Rate of Shear per Stage
Stress, Displacement, Strength, Required to
Specimen Description kg/cm 2 cm/day d~r', deg Achieve ~r ', cmb
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
56 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
Residual Displacement
Normal Rate of Shear per Stage
Stress, Displacement, Strength, Required to
Specimen Description kg/cm 2 cm/day ~, ', deg Achieve ~r ', cmb
* Residual strength for a given normal load, taken at slowest displacement rate at greatest
cumulative a m o u n t of displacement.
b Not cumulative.
c Considered incorrect.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
I , ~|
jb~#:7o* As|
o I~-'~'~ I I I I I
o 2..5 s.o 7.s ~o.o ~z.s 0 2..5 .5.0 7.5 IC*.D 12.5 Z
a. DAWSON S H A L E , CHATF'IELD DAM d. KINCAID S H A L E j C O O P E R DAM 9" PIERRE S H A L E (HIGH P L A S T I C I T Y ' ) m
OAHE DAM Z
0
2 A~ 2 NOTE: TESTS CONDUCTED IN O,75N NclzSO 4 .
Z
1:7
LEGEND
0
r"
0 ~ I
0 2.5 .5.0 7.5 IO.O 12.5 0 2.5 5 0 7.5 IO,O 12.5
EFFECTIVE NORMAL STRESS ~ r KG/CMZ
c. STRAWN S H A L E , PROCTOR DAM f . PIERRE S H A L E (LOW P L A S T I C I T Y ) "1"
O A H E DAM r-
FIG. 1--Residual strength envelopes o f various clay shale specimens with precut failure
planes.
OI
"M
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
5{} SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
DAWSON SHALE
TAYLOR I SHALE
STRAWN SHALE
K INCAID SHALE
PIERRE SHALE
(LOW PLASTICITY)
PIERRE SHALE
(HIGH PLASTiCITy) RA•""'NGE
OF VALUES FOR
ANNULAR SHEAR TESTS
i
LE, ,END
O A N N U L A R SHEAR I. EFFECTS OF O'n IGNORED, s CM/DAY
{3 REPEATED DIRECT SHEAR 2. REPEATED A N N U L A R TEST - N O T
A ROTATIONAL SHEAR ONE- DIRECTIONAL SHEARING
FIG. 2--Range in ~r' values measuredby various test techniques and methods.
Effect o f Remolding
Figure 1 indicates that comparable residual shear strengths are mea-
sured by annular shear or repeated direct shear tests on intact specimens
with precut failure planes and by rotational shear tests on specimens
of remolded material. Although remolded material was not tested in
annular shear or repeated direct shear in this study, Bishop et al [3] and
LaGatta [8] demonstrated that nearly identical residual shear strength
values were measured on remolded and intact specimens. These results
suggest that the use of remolded material offers an alternative method of
specimen preparation for determining ~r' values. However, the problems
associated with soft materials tested in repeated direct shear tests men-
tioned in the preceding paragraph may seriously restrict this procedure
unless the overestimation of ~,' by repeated direct shear tests is acceptable.
The results listed in Tables 1 and 2 and presented in Fig. 1 demonstrate
that, although the classification indexes vary dramatically with processing
procedure, the method of processing has little effect on measured
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
TOWNSEND AND GILBERT ON CLAYS AND CLAY SHALES 59
Effect of Density
The annular shear test results for dense and loosely compacted intact
specimens of micaceous silty sand are listed in Table 3 and presented in
Figs. 4 and 5. These results show that ddr' is independent of initial specimen
density. Obviously, the large deformations required to achieve a residual
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
60 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
3.0
LEGEND
SPECIMEN NOTE: NUMBERS BESIDE DATA POINTS
TYPE REFER TO SEQUENCE OF LOADING.
I 0 ~NTACT ~ = 8.7 ~ WHEN PLOTTED
PRECUT TO EQUAL SCALES.
0
z 2.0
m ~
+;
g
zj~ 8,s ~
o I I Z I I
a.s 5.o 7.5 ~o.o ~z.5
NORMAL STRESS ~ 9 KG/CM 2
FIG. 3--Residual strength for annular shear tests on precut and intact specimens of soft,
Volta Grande Brazilian clay.
condition alter any structure imposed by compaction, and the final void
ratio in the failure zone is dependent only upon the effective normal
stress, that is, the critical void ratio.
E f f e c t o f N o r m a l Stress
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
- LEGEND
to Z
to 0
M
O3 r-
m
tO
I
to 0
.J
D 0
o
(,q
&J
rr
Z
0
o I
o [ 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 IO
i
NORMAL STRESS O-'n} KG/CM 2 -r
I-
F I G . 4 - - R e s i d u a l shear strength e n v e l o p e f o r Paraitinga material.
O3
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
62 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
-- O
It
',,(
r
W 6J
J d t~
D_ 0_
UU
O0
d J z
mnn
~"~I O 0
zE~ ~3
"9 W w~ \
uo~: \
O~Z \
I I I I I O
O
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
TOWNSEND AND GILBERT ON CLAYS AND CLAY SHALES 63
Institute [10] also indicated that d?~' for Bearpaw shale varies only slightly
with normal stress, while similar tests on Pepper shale show a marked
dependence of ~ ' on o, '. Kenney [16] suggested that this dependence of
~r' upon the normal stress would be greater for highly montmorillonitic
clays than for soils composed of massive minerals.
Conclusions
Within the bounds of this investigation (the testing methods employed
and the procedures and equipment used) and from published information
of similar studies, the following conclusions are drawn.
(a) The difference in residual friction angles, ~r ', measured by re-
peated direct shear tests, annular shear tests, or rotational shear tests
for different hard clay shales, varied from a minimum of 1.0 to a maximum
of 3.3 deg and averaged 2.4 deg for the various materials tested. These
variations include effects of different testing procedures and types of
tests and are considered to be small. However, other investigators have
indicated greater differences between results of repeated direct shear tests
and annular shear tests on soft clays.
(b) The residual friction angle is, for practical purposes, independent
of specimen preparation procedure and density, and comparable residual
shear strengths were obtained on intact, precut, and remolded specimens.
The residual friction angle is also independent of ~nor~al stress; the
residual strength envelope is accurately described by a straight line through
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
64 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
the origin. However, some investigators have indicated that, for normal
stresses less than 2.0 kg/cm 2 (1.96 x l0 s Pa), the residual envelope is
curved; that is, the residual friction angle is dependent upon normal stress.
(c) The sequence of application of normal stresses in a given test has
no significant effect on the residual strength envelope. However, several
centimetres of additional displacement may be required to establish
residual conditions under reduced stresses.
(d) The Harvard rotational shear device offers a rapid, satisfactory,
and low-cost means for determining ~r' for many, but not all, clay shales.
Tests in which the Harvard rotational shear apparatus is used should be
restricted to shales with a minus 2/am content (blenderized) greater than
55 to 60 percent because of the adverse effects of the coarser particles.
A cknowledgments
The tests described and the resulting data presented herein, unless other-
wise noted, were obtained from research conducted under the Civil Works
Investigation Program of the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers by the
Waterways Experiment Station. Permission was granted by the Chief of
Engineers to publish this information.
References
[1] Herrmann, H. G. and Wolfskill, L. A., "Engineering Properties of Nuclear Craters;
Residual Shear Strength of Weak Shales," Technical Report 3-699, Report 5, U. S.
Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Corps of Engineers, Vicksburg, Miss.,
Dee. 1966.
[2] De Beer, E. in Proceedings, Geotechnical Conference, Vol. 1, Oslo, Norway, 1967,
pp. 83-88.
[3] Bishop, A. W. et al, Geotechnique, Vol. 21, No. 4, Dec. 1971, pp. 273-328.
[4] Skempton, A. W., Geotechnique, Vol. 14, No. 2, June 1964, pp. 77-101.
[5] Tiedemann, B., Bautechnik, Vol. 15, Nos. 30 and 33, 1937, pp. 400-403 and 433-435.
[6] Hvorslev, M. J., "Uber die Festigkeitseigenschaften Gestorter Bindiger Boden," In-
geniorvidenskabelige Skrifter A-Nr. 45, Danmarks Naturvidenskabelige Samfund,
Copenhagen, Denmark, 1937 ("Physical Properties of Remolded Cohesive Soils,"
Translation No. 69-5, June 1969, U. S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station,
Corps of Engineers, Vicksburg, Miss.).
[7] Petley, D. J., "The Shear Strength of Soils at Large Strains," Ph.D. dissertation,
University of London, London, England, 1966.
[8] LaGatta, D. P., "Residual Strength of Clays and Clay-Shales by Rotation Shear Tests,"
Contract Report S-70-5, U. S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Corps of
Engineers, Vicksburg, Miss., June 1970; prepared by Harvard University under Contract
Nos. DACW39-67-C-0024 and DACW39-69-C-0028 (Harvard Soil Mechanics Series
No. 86, July 1970).
[9] Skempton, A. W. in Proceedings, Sixth International Conference on Soil Mechanics
and Foundation Engineering, Vol. III, Discussion, Session 8, Montreal, 1965, pp.
551-552.
[10] Kenney, T. C., "Direct-Shear Tests on Samples of Pepper and Bearpaw Shales,"
Internal Report F.24-13.01, Norwegian Geotechnical Institute, Oslo, Norway, May 1965.
[11] Townsend, F. C. and Banks, D. C., "Preparation Effects on Clay Shale Classification
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
TOWNSEND AND GILBERT ON CLAYS AND CLAY SHALES 65
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
A r a A r m a n 1 a n d K . L. M c M a n i s ~
REFERENCE: Arman, Ara and McManis, K. L., "Effects of Storage and Extrusion
on Sample Properties," Soil Specimen Preparation for Laboratory Testing, ASTM
STP 599, American Society for Testing and Materials, 1976, pp. 66-87.
ABSTRACT: The shear strength of specimens obtained with thin-walled tubes de-
creased as a result of long-term storage. The preconsolidation pressure of stored
tube samples also followed a similar trend. Specimens obtained from hand-cut blocks
did not show a decrease in strength or preconsolidation pressure with time. Samples
stored by wrapping in plastic film and aluminum foil were found to be preserved
as well as those stored after coating with paraffin. Stresses applied to samples for
extruding from thin-wailed tubes were found to be in excess of the shear strength of
the soils. X-ray radiographs of specimens obtained with thin-walled tubes showed
excessive disturbances caused by sampling and extrusion.
66
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed
Copyright9 1976 by by ASTM International www.astm.org
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
ARMAN AND McMANIS ON STORAGE AND EXTRUSION 67
Literature Survey
Hvorslev [1],2 in his classical work on subsurface exploration, listed the
requirements for a suitable, undisturbed laboratory specimen: no distur-
bance of the soil structure, no change in water content or void ratio, and
no alteration in constituents or chemical composition. At the same time,
he acknowledged the fact that such criteria are impossible to meet. Most
geotechnical engineers, realizing the limitations of sampling, use test data
with caution. Often, however, uncertainties arising from sample distur-
bance become glossed over by sophistications involving the analysis and
design of foundations.
Various methods and tools for borehole sampling have evolved, and
cores obtained with thin-walled tubes have been accepted universally. In
spite of warnings, such as one by Terzaghi and Peck [2], that, " I f tube
samples have been taken . . . . it is always desirable to investigate the
extent to which the consistency of the clay has been affected . . . . " little
attention is paid to the extent of disturbance in most daily work.
Bozozuk [3] showed that the long-term storage of marine clays reduced
the measured preconsolidation pressure by 4.8 percent. Thus, consolida-
tion tests should be conducted as soon as possible after sampling. Kall-
stenius [4] found a general lowering of the strength of samples with
storage time.
Many investigators have found that tube sampling causes disturbance,
resulting from excessive friction along the wall of the tube. It is logical
to expect, therefore, that similar disturbances also occur during the extru-
sion of samples. Lang [5] measured the forces acting on a stiff clay in an
open-drive, thin-walled tube sampler and, by two different methods,
determined the ratio of peak forces (inside force/outside force) to be
0.48 and 0.28, respectively. The average friction along the tube wall was
64 percent of the shear strength of the soil. The peak axial stress in the
core had a mean value of 13.4 times its uniaxial shear strength. Sone [6]
found the pressure required for extrusion of an alluvial clayey silt to be
several times larger than its unconfined compressive strength, and the
compression during extrusion was almost equivalent to the failure axial
strain measured in the unconfined compression test. Nuclear techniques
to determine changes in the bulk density of soil samples resulting from
sampling and extrusion showed only minor changes resulting from extru-
sion [7].
2The italic numbersin brackets refer to the list of referencesappendedto this paper.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
68 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
Penetration Tests
The ASTM Penetration Test and Split-Barrel Sampling of Soils (ASTM
D 1586-67) were made for visual classification and determination of nat-
ural moisture content to assure that all later tests would be performed
in the same soil deposit.
The ASTM Thin-Walled Tube Sampling of Soils (D 1587-67) was made
with 2.8-in. tubes to obtain cores for several experiments. Except for
certain samples to be used for extrusion tests in the laboratory, the cores
were extruded in the field with a hydraulic ram, classified visually, cut
into 10 in. lengths, and then wrapped or coated. The samples for extru-
sion testing were sent to the laboratory in sealed tubes.
Sample Protection
Because two methods of sealing the extruded cores were to be com-
pared, identical samples were eitheff immersed completely in melted
paraffin or wrapped first in household polyethylene film and aluminum
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authoriz
ARMAN AND McMANIS ON STORAGE AND EXTRUSION 69
foil and then sealed in household polyethylene bags. All samples were
transported in specially molded styrofoam boxes (Fig. 1).
B l o c k Samples
Hand-cut block samples (1 ft cubes) were obtained from only two of
the sites because of the difficulty of obtaining such samples from deep
layers. One set of these was obtained from a deposit of stiff pleistocene
clay in southeast Louisiana at depths of 15 to 35 ft. A second set was
obtained from a soft highly-dessicated fat clay (recent Mississippi River
alluvial deposit) at depths of 5 to 15 ft. Standard penetration tests and
tube sampling were performed at the natural ground surface within a
radius of 15 ft of the block sampling sites.
The samples were cut by chain saw and hand tools from active borrow
pits which were excavated immediatley preceding the tube sampling. They
were covered with several layers of aluminum foil and paraffin and placed
in specially fabricated boxes with 1 in. of sawdust insulation all around.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
70 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
sis of Soils (D 422-63); ASTM Test for Liquid Limit of Soils (D 423-66);
and ASTM Test for Plastic Limit and Plasticity Index of Soils (D 424-59).
Long-term storage effects required, in addition: ASTM Tests for Uncon-
fined Compressive Strength of Cohesive Soils (D 2166-66); ASTM Test
for Unconsolidated, Undrained Strength of Cohesive Soils in Triaxial
Compression (D 2850-70); and ASTM Test for One-Dimensional Con-
solidation Properties of Soils (D 2435-70). The effects of core extrusion
from thin-walled tubes were studied from the unconfined compressive
strengths, consolidation, and radiographs.
Sample Protection
The coating of undisturbed samples with paraffin has been accepted
universally as one method of preserving sample integrity. However, earlier
laboratory observations indicated that even experienced and careful tech-
nicians had difficulties in removing the hardened paraffin without damage
to the samples, Sweating under the paraffin was noted also. A sample
from a depth of 40 ft has a temperature of about 65~ (18~ When
it is wrapped in foil and dipped in hot paraffin 120~ (49~ consider-
able sweating results, with an increase of moisture content in a zone
adjacent to the outer surface of the sample. The potential sudden effects
of water migration on the pore pressure and moisture distribution, as well
as the homogeneity of the soil, would be highly undesirable. The use of
aluminum foil and plastic film as an alternative protective coating was
studied.
Approximately 100 tube samples (about 18 in. long) of three types of
soil were split immediately after sampling to make three specimens. One
of these, to be used for determining the natural moisture content, was
wrapped in a plastic bag. The others were used to determine the effective-
ness of alternative protective coatings. One slice, after being wrapped in
foil, was placed in a 6-in. round ice cream carton which, in turn, was
filled with melted paraffin (the usual field procedure). The other specimen
was wrapped in aluminum foil and sealed with household plastic film.
The three specimens from one sample were then placed in a clear plastic
bag that was sealed partially with a twist wire tie and sent immediately
to the laboratory in a styrofoam container.
The natural moisture contents were determined immediately upon arrival
at the laboratory. Both the paraffin-coated and the foil/plastic-wrapped
specimens were stored at 100 percent relative humidity and 72~ (22~
After random storage periods of 14 to 33 days, the two specimens of a
set were tested for moisture content.
The results indicated that the foil/plastic wrapping maintained the
moisture content of a specimen just as well as the paraffin coating (Table
1). After these tests, the Louisiana Department of Highways adopted
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorize
ARMAN AND McMANIS ON STORAGE AND EXTRUSION 71
S i m u l a t e d F i e l d Storage
Earlier observations had shown that sampling crews remain in the field
usually about five days before bringing samples to the laboratory. These
samples are generally extruded in the field, wrapped, placed in the special
s t y r o f o a m boxes (Fig. 1), and stored in covered trucks. The temperature
in the storage part o f these trucks often rose to and remained at I I 0 ~
(43 ~ for about 10 h each day.
To study the effect o f such storage on moisture content, 10-in.-long
samples (2.8 in. diameter) were brought in plastic bags to the laboratory
immediately after extrusion. A Y2-in.-thick specimen was cut f r o m the
middle to determine the natural moisture content. The remaining two end
sections (about 4.5 in. long) were then rewrapped and placed in the styro-
f o a m containers. One set of containers was kept in a forced-draft oven
at l l 0 ~ (43~ the other set at 72~ (22~ and 100 percent relative
humidity. After five days, the specimens were removed and the moisture
contents determined f r o m the entire 4.5 in. length.
Because no appreciable difference in moisture content was found
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions autho
72 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
among the three sets, it is evident that the storage methods and the two
protective coatings caused no changes in the moisture content (Table 2).
Thus, any observed differences in the moisture content of samples are
inherent--probably due to silt and calcareous intrusions, etc.
Moisture Content, %
5 Days at 72 ~ and
Soil Type Natural 5 Days at 100~ 100 Percent Humidity
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
30
&
Z Z
w
~ 2o Z
0
_J
0
Z
F.-
15 o
t~ 2.8 in. r cores trimmed to 2 . 5 i n . Q- Z
Z
O~
-4
er 0
a
\ \
Z )>
I0 m
.\
Z
0
m
X
-4
I i i I | I t i I t I , I , I , tl I I I I
5 I0 50 I00 500 o
LOG TIME (DAYS) Z
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
74 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
Extrusion Effects
Several methods are used to extrude soil cores from sampling tubes.
Pressurized water, as well as hydraulic rams, are used in the field or lab-
oratory. Each method affects the soil properties, depending on the soil
type, its condition, and the type of sampling tube, etc.
Several replicate samples were obtained with a 2.8-in. thin-walled tube
from each type of soil deposit. Some cores were extruded hydraulically
in the field and placed in a protective coating. Others were sealed in the
tubes. All samples were transported without delay to the laboratory.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authori
ARMAN AND McMANIS ON STORAGE AND EXTRUSION 75
2 I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
5 I0 50 I00 150
LOG TIME (DAYS)
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
76 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
1.2
I.I
'.o F
0.9
I-
<~
0:0.8
Q
\
>
@
0.7
0.6
0.41 I I I I ~r
I 2 4 8 16 32
LOG PRESSURE (tons/ft 2)
F I G . 4--Storage effect on e versus log p plots.
During core extrusion, the end of the sample in contact with the piston
began to show measurable displacements before the opposite end. Thus,
internal displacements were occurring within the tube. The maximum
strain (the strain at the piston end before steady movement at the opposite
end) varied from 0.001 to 0.005. The average strain was 0.003 (Table 3).
In all cases, the applied stress exceeded the unconfined compressive
strength of the soil to a maximum of 900 percent. This is somewhat less
than the 1340 percent measured by Sone [5].
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
ARMAN AND McMANIS ON STORAGE AND EXTRUSION 77
25 78 0.001 6 9
33 198 0.003 28 ...
=Laboratory extruded.
bField extruded.
Radiography
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authoriz
78 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
ARMAN AND MCMANIS ON STORAGE AND EXTRUSION 79
Photoelastic Analysis
To obtain a qualitative analysis of the stress patterns developed during
sampling, a photoelastic analysis was performed with a thin-walled tube
that had two opposite 90 deg arcs of the wall removed.
A gelatin/water mixture was poured into a 4 by 5-ft by 3-in. glass-
walled tank with cross polorizing filters on the walls. After the gelatin
had set, the tube sampler was driven in slowly by hand. The developed
stress patterns (resulting from bi-refringence of gelation) were recorded
on color movie film and color still photographs (Fig. 9). These patterns,
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
80 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
covering the full volume of the driven tube, were very similar to the bent
layers in soft soils that had been observed in the radiographs (Fig. 6).
However, no failure planes developed.
Although this experiment showed that distortion occurs during sampler
driving, it did not disprove the earlier stated contention; friction, due to
adhesion of the soil to the tube wall, increases the distortion during extru-
sion.
Importance f o r Design
The selection of a specimen to represent a specific soil deposit is critical
to soil data acquisition. Once the choice has been made, the designer
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
ARMAN AND McMANIS ON STORAGE AND EXTRUSION 81
receives only the data obtained from that particular point in the ground,
or for the whole deposit, from a few selected samples. In special cases,
when all the samples are used for testing, any errors that may result from
specimen choice can be eliminated.
In order to observe and analyze the specimen selection process, the
authors made long-term observations in several soil laboratories, as well
as testing samples obtained from various sources. A review of the soil
profiles at several agencies indicated that the soil characteristics were
plotted as neatly divided 3-ft layers. If one considers that thin-walled tube
samples are 3 ft long, such plots indicate arbitrary specimen selection in
the laboratory. However, soils do not always become deposited as homo-
geneous 3-ft layers. Without the benefit of the observations of a well-
qualified soil exploration technician or engineer, a high risk factor may
be introduced into geotechnical engineering.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
82 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
P o c k e t Penetrometers
The use of pocket penetrometers to assist the laboratory technicians
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
ARMAN AND McMANIS ON STORAGE AND EXTRUSION 83
Top of somple
0 rm l i | i i
9
k-
Z
~m
~ 24
3O
36
I I I I I I I
50 I00 150 30 40 50 0 I000 2000 3000 4000
Field N o t e s
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
84 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
ARMAN AND McMANIS ON STORAGE AND EXTRUSION 85
General Conclusions
Undisturbed tube samples do not have to be coated with paraffin for
protection. A wrapping of household polyethelyene film covered by
aluminum foil, followed by sealing in common household polyethelyene
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
86 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
ARMAN AND McMANIS ON STORAGE AND EXTRUSION 87
Acknowledgment
This study was conducted as part of a research project financed by
the Louisiana Department of Highways and the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Federal Highway Administration.
The authors express their gratitude to the Louisiana Department of
Highways for the personnel and equipment they provided. Thanks are
due to Charles Hill, engineering editor, and Norma Duffy, draftswoman,
for their invaluable assistance. The dedicated work of many student work-
ers who spent their time collecting data is gratefully acknowledged.
References
[1] Hvorslev, M. J., Subsurface Exploration and Sampling of Soils for Civil Engineering
Purposes, reprint, Engineering Foundation, 1965.
[2] Terzaghi, K. and Peck, R. B., Soil Mechanics in Engineering Practice, 2nd Edition,
Wiley, New York, 1968.
[3] Bozozuk, M. in Samplings of Soil and Rock, ASTM STP 483, American Society for
Testing and Materials, 1970, pp. 121-131.
[4] Kallstenius, T. in Proceedings, Specialty Session on Quality in Soil Sampling, Fourth
Asian Conference, International Society for Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineer-
ing, Bangkok, July 1971.
[5] Lang, J. G. in Proceedings, Fourth Asian Conference, International Society for Soil
Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Bangkok, July 1971.
[6] Sone, S. in Proceedings, Fourth Asian Conference, International Society for Soil
Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Bangkok, July 1971.
[7] Shackel, B. in Proceedings, Fourth Asian Conference, International Society for Soil
Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Bangkok, July 1971.
[8] Krinitzsky, E. L., Radiography in the Earth Sciences and Soil Mechanics, Plenum
Press, New York-London, 1970.
[9] Kenny, T. C. and Chan, H. T., Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 9, 1972, p. 195.
[10] Holtz, W. G. in Laboratory Shear Testing of Soils, ASTM STP 361, American Society
for Testing and Materials, 1963, p. 417.
[11] Coats, D. F. and McRostie, G. C. in Laboratory Shear Testing of Soils, ASTM STP
361, American Society for Testing and Materials, 1963, p. 459.
[12] Lo, K. Y., Seychuk, J. L., and Adams, J. I. in Sampling of Soil and Rock, ASTM
STP 483, American Society for Testing and Materials, June 1970, pp. 60-71.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
T. H. IV. Baker'
Transportation, Preparation,
and Storage of Frozen Soil Samples
for Laboratory Testing
88
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed9 by
Copyright 1976byASTMInternational www.astm.org
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
BAKER ON FROZEN SOIL SAMPLES 89
Naturally Frozen
Undisturbed block and core samples of frozen soil must be pro-
tected from thawing and loss of moisture, from the time they are
taken from the ground, throughout the period of transportation,
storage, machining, and testing. In most cases, the sample must be
maintained under the same thermal and moisture conditions existing
at the time of sampling. The implications and practicality of this
will be discussed later.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
90 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
Methods of handling frozen soil samples in the field have not changed
greatly in recent years. When the samples have been examined visually
and logged at the field site, most investigators wrap the frozen samples in
cellophane and place them in polyethylene bags (6 mil) (Fig. 1). All air
FIG. 1--Large block sample of frozen soil delivered from the fieM in a polyethylene bag
(scale in tenths of afoot).
must be evacuated from the bag, and it must be sealed to prevent sub-
limation. This is accomplished best by using a vacuum pump, but can be
done by forcing most of the air out by hand before sealing. Humidity can
be maintained by placing some snow or crushed ice in the bag. Heat
sealing the plastic bag after de-airing gives the most permanent seal, but a
locking nylon tie (of the type used for bundling electric cables) is adequate
if it is fastened properly. The seal should be checked regularly; any air
that has entered the bag should be removed, and the bag should be re-
sealed. This packaging procedure keeps moisture loss from the sample
within acceptable limits and has been used successfully by the author to
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
BAKER ON FROZEN SOIL SAMPLES 91
~The italic numbers in brackets refer to the list of references appended to this
paper.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
92 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
LARGE D-HANDLES
BOLTED TO BOX
i:
METAL BANDING
FOR REINFORCEMENT
FIG. 2--Typical insulated box used for field storage and shipping.
increase. When ice or freezer packs are used, there is no drastic cooling
of the samples, but, in time, the temperature of the insulated box and
samples will increase unless the ice is rel~laced periodically.
If the boxes are to be stored for any length of time (for example, a few
weeks), it is advisable to pack snow or crushed ice around the sample
bags to prevent sublimation and to fill any air spaces with crushed news-
paper to provide added insulation and reduce movement of air in the box.
The cover of the box should be fastened securely and made airtight by
applying a thin bead of room temperature vulcanizing silicone rubber
(RTV) caulking compound around the edge of the lid before the box is
closed.
Although not entirely satisfactory, tempory measures to protect
samples in the field can be used in some instances. During the winter,
frozen soil samples, packaged in polyethylene bags, can be buried in snow
drifts, or, if the ambient air temperature is below 0~ they can be left in
the open air but must be protected (shaded) from the sunlight. During the
summer, frozen samples have been stored successfully for up to three
days in shallow pits dug in the frozen ground or put into plastic sleeves
and stored in the boreholes from which they were taken. The pit should
be lined and covered with some insulating material. Moss serves quite
well for this purpose. The top of boreholes, used to store samples, should
be covered or plugged with insulation to prevent thawing and closing of
the hole.
If adequate storage facilities are not available at the field site and the
samples are to remain frozen, they must be transported immediately to a
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
BAKER ON FROZEN SOIL SAMPLES 93
Artificially Frozen
The physical properties that affect the mechanical behavior of soil, for
example, homogeneity, grain size, moisture content, compaction, and, to
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
94 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
some extent, ice lens structure, should be closely controlled. This can be
achieved in the laboratory by using special molds and controlled methods
of freezing.
The steps followed in the preparation of laboratory frozen soil speci-
mens are:
1. Assembly of the mold.
2. Compaction of the soil sample.
3. Saturation of the sample.
4. Freezing.
5. Disassembly of the mold and removal of the sample.
The geometry of the mold is determined by the desired shape of the
test specimen. Rectangular, cylindrical, and dumbbell specimen shapes
commonly are used, depending on the test to be performed. As unidirec-
tional freezing of the sample is usually desirable, the mold is fabricated
from or covered with materials having good insulating properties. Use of
split molds with all joints ,fastened by easily removed connectors greatly
facilitates specimen removal after freezing. All interfacing surfaces of the
mold and all threads on metal connectors should be coated with a lubri-
cant to ensure a tight fit for evacuating the air from the samples and to
aid in extracting the sample from the mold in the cold room. Care must
be taken to prevent the lubricant (especially the silicone types) from
coming in contact with the sample.
Air-dried soil usually is placed into a mold in 30-mm-thick layers and
compacted by a drop hammer or vibration action, following standard soil
mechanics procedures (for example, Modified Proctor, American Association
of State Highway Officials' Standard). Each layer should be scarified to a
depth of approximately 5 mm before the next layer is placed. If the soil
has a wide range of grain sizes, vibration may cause the particles to separate
into layers of uniform size. For sands, the vibratory technique is the
better compaction method.
The following method of evacuation and saturation has been found by
Haynes [3] to give a fully saturated compact sample.
After the sample has been compacted, caps can be placed on each end
of the mold. Both end caps should be fitted with hose connections, which
include porous stones, to prevent the loss of soil during the air evacuation
and water saturation phase. Plastic tubes are connected to both of the end
caps. The tube from the top cap is connected to a vacuum pump; the tube
from the bottom cap leads to an o n / o f f valve and then to a reservoir of
distilled water. A vacuum pump is also connected to the water reservoir.
The on/off valve allows for separate deaeration of the mold and the
reservoir. A photograph of the apparatus is shown in Fig. 4.
A vacuum is applied to the top of the mold with the o n / o f f valve
closed. At the same time the distilled water reservoir is placed under a
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
BAKER ON FROZEN SOIL SAMPLES 95
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
96 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
FIG. 5--Vermiculite placed around the mold to allow the sample to freeze unidirectionally.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
BAKER ON FROZEN SOIL SAMPLES 97
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
98 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
Frozen soil samples should be handled with gloves and all tools and
equipment kept in the cold room to avoid sample damage by localized
thawing. A temperature of - 5 _+1 ~ is the most suitable ambient tem-
perature for machining with respect to material workability and personal
comfort. At warmer temperatures, surface thawing is a problem, and
cutting tools must be cleaned frequently, for they become coated and
clogged with frozen soil, reducing their cutting efficiency. Working at
colder temperatures is uncomfortable and slow. The soil is also difficult
to work with because of increased hardness; cracks can be formed easily
in it, due to increased brittleness.
Any cracking induced in the specimen during preparation will reduce
the load-carrying capability and influence the test results. Thermal dis-
turbance, due to frictional melting by a cutting tool, may be insignificant
when preparing specimens for thaw consolidation tests, but it may be very
significant for strength tests. Extreme care must be taken when machining
frozen soil samples for testing to keep disturbance to an absolute mini-
mum.
Various cutting and grinding techniques have been used to machine
specimens to the shape required for the test to be performed.
Finishing Methods
After being cut roughly to the required dimension, rectangular speci-
mens are finished usually by one, or a combination, of the following
methods, listed in increasing order of precision:
1. Hand shaving with a sharp, straight cutting edge (for example, a
draw knife).
2. A coarse wood rasp or file.
3. Grinding with several grades of emery paper or grinding stone.
4. Milling machine equipped with heavy-duty cutters.
5. Drill press (heavy-duty) equipped with an end milling tool.
These methods have been used on a wide range of frozen soils, and the
particular application of each is dependent upon the required specimen
tolerances. The allowable specimen tolerance is dependent on the type of
test to be preformed and is discussed next.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
BAKER ON FROZEN SOIL SAMPLES 99
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
TABLE 1--Rough cutting methods. Q
Chain s a w excellent for rough cutting large blocks of ineffective in cutting frozen clay with the
Electric powered 254 frozen peat and silt which have high teeth and chain becoming clogged with 0
"11
mm arm ice contents clay and the blade binding in the cut
---I
Gas powered 381 mm 0
arm
Band saw very satisfactory for cutting fine-grain largest sample that could be cut was 159 .--t
m
1/2 hp, 1725 rpm specimens; quite adequate for coarse mm thick, but with height attachment --4
sands (Fig. 7) up to 311 mm
5 mm blade, 2 teeth/cm fast cut blade wanders when cutting specimens 60 if)
to 200 mm thick
10 mm blade, 1 tooth/cm straight cut cuts slowly and dulls very quickly due to
the abrasive action of the frozen soil;
tooth life very short with no significant
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
difference between ferrous, non-ferrous
and wood cutting blades
Diamond saw in conjunction with table and guide, it is depth of cut restricted by the radius of
the most desirable method for cutting the blade; clayey soils greatly reduce
frozen soils; very clean straight cut cutting efficiency of the saw blade as
even in coarse-grain pebbly soils the blade must be cleaned regularly
7~
Ill
2O
O
Z
"r
-n
O
N
m
z
o')
0
"o
I-"
m
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
102 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
BAKER ON FROZEN SOIL SAMPLES 103
may contain large ice inclusions (lenses, etc.) that are very fragile and
easily chipped. Unexpected occurrences of pebbles can ruin many hours
of machining if care is not taken when they are detected. Many samples,
obtained at high cost in the field, have not been tested because they were
too difficult to machine.
These combined cutting and coring processes are used to prepare frozen
soil specimens for all forms of load testing. Dimensional tolerances for
uniaxial thaw-consolidation test specimens are particularly critical, as the
sample must fit tightly into the consolidometer ring. The nature of the
other tests is such that the dimensions of specimens are less critical.
It is important that the ends of the specimens are parallel and plane, so
that intimate contact occurs with the loading platens. Seating errors have
been observed on many loading curves [4]. Eccentric loading can give
lower strength values [3], but these are often ignored.
Although the effects of thermal disturbance induced by machining pro-
cedures have not been investigated, every effort should be made to elimi-
nate or reduce them, especially on clay samples. Surface thawing has been
noticed on several occasions when machining specimens of frozen day.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
104 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
BAKER ON FROZEN SOIL SAMPLES 105
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
106 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
eral waxes could not be used as they must be heated. Although many of
the surface coatings reduced the rate o f surface evaporation, none o f the
materials investigated provided satisfactory protection for more than one
week.
Frozen soil specimens at the University of Alberta have been coated
with a thin layer of ice by applying a fine spray of supercooled distilled
water [I]. This film o f ice prevents sublimation of the sample and is re-
moved easily prior to testing.
Yershov et al [18] published information on the sublimation o f frozen
soils. As shown in Fig. 13, different soil types have different sublimation
rates. Finer grained clay soils have a higher evaporation rate than do
coarser sands. The rate o f sublimation is affected greatly by the ambient
temperature (Fig. 14). The parameters studied were temperature, relative
humidity, and air velocity, but no details were given on how the experi-
ments were undertaken nor on the apparatus used.
A similar study was undertaken by the author to determine the rate of
sublimation on three soil types: Ottawa sand (20 to 30 mesh), Niagara silt,
and Leda clay. Four specimens of each soil type were prepared by adding
50 g o f water to equal volumes o f each soil and placing the mixture in
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
BAKER ON FROZEN SOIL SAMPLES 107
plastic boxes 1.9 • 10-2 m deep, having a surface area o f 3.31 • 10-3 m 2.
Two samples of each soil type had their surfaces covered with cellophane;
the others were left uncovered. All the samples were weighed and placed
in the cold room to freeze at a temperature o f - 4 . 4 ~ and a relative hu-
midity of 37 percent. The specimens were weighed after 8 h and then once
a day for 23 days. Results are presented in Fig. 15.
The sublimation rates of the frozen soils investigated by the author are
within the same range as those reported by Yershov et al [18]. Similarly, it
was found that the finer clay soils have higher sublimation rates than the
coarser sands. This is because the larger particle surface area in fine-grained
soils allows for film flow, which brings the water to the surface o f the
sample. Samples that were covered with cellophane had significantly
lower sublimation rates than those that were left uncovered.
Many investigators [5,7,17,19-21] have found that the compressive
strength of frozen soil is greatly dependent on its overall moisture con-
tent. Compressive strength increased with increasing moisture content. It
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
108 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
reached a maximum when the soil was saturated completely and then de-
creased to the strength of ice. Any loss of moisture from a specimen,
therefore, will cause a change in its compressive strength.
The compressive behavior of frozen soil is also affected greatly by tem-
perature and by temperature fluctuations. It is imperative, therefore, that
specimens be stored and tested in a freezing chamber that has only a small
temperature fluctuation to minimize thermal disturbance. The effect of
fluctuations in temperature can be reduced by enclosing the specimen in
an insulating jacket during storage and testing. Vyalov [6] suggested the
following permissible temperature variations when storing and testing
frozen soils within different ranges:
Temperature, ~ up t o - 2 -2to -5 -5to-10 below-10
Permissible devia- _+0.1 _+0.2 __.0.5 ___1.0
tion
Guarded hot plate experiments carried out by Hoekstra [22] using Fair-
banks silt (see Fig. 16) show that any thermal gradient in the sample, even
at temperatures below freezing, will cause moisture redistribution in fro-
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
I I I I I J
TEMP.: -1.6deg C
REL. HUM,: 65% I I I I I
A I R V E L . : 4 . 2 m/sec
O MOSCOW LOAM
9 KIEV CLAY
GLUKHOV KAOLIN
I
20
< go
>
z z
0 2(1 o m
..n
BENTONITE
O O
z
D
"11
10 __ ~o
O
M ~ v N
10 m
ISANDY LOAM \ Z
q')
0
9...... TIME = 600h I--
0 I >
0 -2 -4 -6 -8 -10 -12 -14
0 L I I I I I I TEMPERATURE, deg C -o
t-
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 in
TIME, h
if)
FIG. 14--Sublimation and temperature ( Yershov et al [18])
FIG. 13--Sublimation rates o f frozen soils ( Yershov et al [18])
O
(.O
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
110 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
4o t I I I I I I
2O
z
o
I00
.[ _ I
200 300 400
TIME, h
I I
500 600
t 700
0.35 I I I I I I I [ I I I
I
k .ICE LAYER
0 30 I~'x
E ~''"/,'~',k INITIAL WATER CONTENT
~-"
Z ~ ~ S = 0.73 r t40 MIN
TIME = R _-,
Z 0.25 1 6 0 _ - - -B'" - --'
I 2 3 4 5
DISTANCE FROM COLD PLATE, inches
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
BAKER ON FROZEN SOIL SAMPLES 111
Conclusions
The important factors to be considered in transporting, preparing, and
storing frozen soils for laboratory testing are the control of the effects of
sublimation/evaporation and minimization of thermal disturbance. Their
effect on the ice content, fabric, and unfrozen moisture content of the
specimen, and, therefore, on the strength and deformation behavior of
the material, is of great significance. Further evaluation of existing proce-
dures and development of new or improved techniques are required be-
fore standard methods can be proposed for the laboratory testing of fro-
zen soils.
Acknowledgments
The author wishes to acknowledge the assistance of W. D. Roggensack,
University of Alberta, M. S. King, University of Saskatchewan, and W.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
112 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
References
[ll goggensack, W. D., University of Alberta, personal communication, 1974.
[2] Slusarchuk, W. A., Northern Engineering Services Ltd., Calgary, Alta., personal com-
munication, 1974.
[3] Haynes, F. D., U.S. Army Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory, personal
communication, 1974.
[4] Goughnour, R. and Andersland, O. B., Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundation
Division, American Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 94, No. SMI, 1968, pp. 923-950.
[5] Hooke, R. L., Dahlin, B. B., and Kauper, M. T., Journal of Glaciology, Vol. 11, 1972,
pp. 327-336.
[6] Vyalov, S. S., "Methods of Determining Creep, Long-Term Strength, and Compres-
sibility Characteristics of Frozen Soils," National Research Council Technical Transla-
tion, T'r-1364, Ottawa, 1969.
[7] Tsytovich, N. A. and Sumgin, M. I. "Principles of Mechanics of Frozen Ground,"
U.S. Army, Snow, Ice, Permafrost Research Establishment, Translation No. 19, 1959.
[8] Lechner, W., "Peltier Cooling," Philips Technical Review, No. 27, 1966, pp. 113-130.
[9] Williams, P. J., Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 5, No. 4, 1968, pp. 264-266.
[10] Webb, E. L. R., "Equivalent Circuit Model for Thermoelectric Temperature Con-
trollers," Bulletin No. 18, Radio and Electrical Engineering Division, National Research
Council of Canada, Ottawa, 1968.
[11] Sayles, F. H., "Creep of Frozen Sands," U.S. Army, Cold Regions Research and
Engineering Laboratory, Technical Report No. 190, 1968.
[12] Sayles, F. H. and Haines, D., "Creep of Frozen Silt and Clay," U.S. Army, Cold Re-
gions Research and Engineering Laboratory, Technical Report No. 252, 1974.
[13] Warder, D. L, and Andersland, O. B., Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 8, No. 1,
1971, pp. 46-68.
[14] Laba, J. T., Highway Research Record, No. 360, 1971, pp. 26-36.
[15] Shuster, J. A. in Proceedings o f the Symposium on Cold Regions Engineering, Ameri-
can Society of Civil Engineering, University of Alaska, Vol. 1, 1971, pp. 73-117.
[16"1 Khomichevskaya, L. S., "Compressive Strength of Permafrost and Ice in Their Natural
States," U.S. Army, Arctic Construction and Frost Effects Laboratory, Translation
No. 20, 1951.
[17] Livingston, C. W., "Explosion Tests in Keweenaw Silt," U.S. Army, Snow, Ice,
Permafrost Research Establishment, Report No. 30, 1956, pp. 25-40.
[18] Yershov, E. D., Gurov, V. V., and Dostovalov, B. N., "Ice Sublimation in Fine-Grained
Soil of Various Cryogenic Structure During its Interaction with an Air-Current," U.S.
Army, Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory, Translation No. 439, 1973,
pp. 2477_251.
llgl Yong, R. N. in Proceedings of the Permafrost International Conference, National
Academy of Sciences-National Research Council, 1963, pp. 315-319.
[20] Kaplar, C. W., "Some Strength Properties of Frozen Soil and Effect of Loading Rate,"
U.S. Army, Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory, Special Report No.
159, 1971.
[21] Andersland, O. B., The Northern Engineer, Vol. 3, No. 3, 1971, pp. 4-6.
[22] Hoekstra, P., Water Resources Research, Vol. 2, No. 2, 1966, pp. 241-250.
[23] Sanger, F. J., "Foundations of Structures in Cold Regions," U.S. Army, Cold Regions
Research and Engineering Laboratory, Monograph No. III-CA, 1969.
[24] Williams, P. J. in Proceedings of the Permafrost International Conference, National
Academy of Sciences-National Research Council, 1963, pp. 225-229.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
Michael Bozozuk'
Temperature-Controlled Humid
Storage Room
KEY WORDS: soils, design, storage room, constant temperature, humidity, samples,
storage time
113
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed
Copyright 9 1976 byby ASTM International www.astm.org
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
114 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
deterioration of the sealing wax, and formation of water blisters (Fig. 1),
and sometimes breeds bacteria that feed upon the soils or the wax. High
temperatures permit dissolved gases in saturated clays to come out of
solution, causing expansion and deterioration of the soil skeleton. If
stored in a dry and warm environment, soil moisture may escape, causing
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
BOZOZUK ON TEMPERATURE CONTROLLED HUMID STORAGE ROOM 115
Design
The storage room was designed as a necessary accessory to laboratory
soil testing facilities. Its purpose is to keep the soil samples in the best
possible condition, that is, to bridge the period from the time they are
obtained in the field until they are tested and to provide a conditioned
environment for performing certain special engineering tests, when re-
quired.
The principle of operation is as follows. Water is directed to flow down
the inside walls of the room to the floor, where it is ponded. Natural
evaporation from the wetted walls and the reservoir that covers the
entire floor area provides relative humidities from 90 to 97 percent. The
temperature control is obtained by circulating the ponded water through a
heat exchanger located outside the room. After it is cooled, it is pumped
back to the top of the room, where it is directed against the walls through
nozzles to complete the flow cycle. Any heat gain through the walls is
picked up by the flowing water and dispelled through the heat exchanger.
The storage room is essentially a copper tank enclosed in an insulated
wood frame. A plan view (Fig. 3) shows the layout of the sample racks
and worktable, relative to the door and window. It was constructed on 2
by 2-in. wood sleepers laid on the concrete floor of the laboratory. Set at
12 in. centers and running parallel to the length of the room, they were
covered with 88 plywood and nailed together (Fig. 4). The
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
116 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
FIG. 2b--Mechancal plant: (a) chilled liquid and (b) heat exchanger.
purpose of the sleepers was to provide an air space and ventilation for the
floor and adequate support for the superstructure, in case it had to be
moved. The plywood was then covered with a vapor barrier that projected
about 2 in. beyond the perimeter.
To facilitate circulation of the ponded water, the floor was sloped 1 in.
to the drain located at the back o f the room by tapering the 2 by 6-in.
floor joists. They were placed across the sleepers to form the floor of the
room. The wall frames, made o f 2 by 3-in. studs, were erected on the
joists, which, in turn, supported the frame roof made up of 2 by 4-in.
joists. All joists and studs were placed at 16 in. centers whenever possible.
The spaces between the studs and joists in the floor and ceiling were
insulated with 2-in.-thick mineral wool insulation. The exterior of the
room was first sheathed with a layer o f 5/16-in. plywood, then covered
completely with a vapor barrier that overlapped at the ends and corners.
It was, in turn, protected with a second layer of 5/16-in. plywood.
The walls, floor, and ceiling inside the room were covered with Y2-in.-
thick fir plywood. Finally, it was covered completely with 20-gage copper
sheeting to form a watertight interior.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
BOZOZUK ON TEMPERATURE CONTROLLED HUMID STORAGE ROOM 117
L. 12'- I0'~ _1
PUMP a MOTOR
CHILLED
HEAT EXCHANGER l --WATER
SUPPLY
t~"FLOOR DRAIN
? j 3 ' x 4'
~ /SAMRLE
r
I
/
RACKS
WORK
TABLE
THERMOPANE
W~NOOW
6L( I
I ~_~---REMOVABLE FLOOR-..~
e-~-r~-(///i SECTIONS ~%"2" OIA. ACCESS
HOLE
I
t~NSITE BAFFLE
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
118 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
WATER
= INLET
T'I"
i,l.._~_
CL A M p
c 2" INSULATION
r-
~2 1/2"
;I 5 / 8 II X I 5/8"
~ 12' C.C. 3/4" SYLVAPLY PLYWO
~/ Fo,~
LEVELLING JO,ST ~' / 2 "
JL,~ , ~ ~ ------CEOA,, , "r
2" DIA.
S/B"nnnn/J TAPEREB JO,ST ""-,/2" FIR PLYWOOD ~,,/'~/'~'.-I-':: ~"OUTLET
pq I~ E,~ II. [X] D..r-Ji
#
EXISTING FLOOR IN LABORATORYj LSLEEPERS X~l/4" PLYWOOD
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
BOZOZUK ON TEMPERATURE CONTROLLED HUMID STORAGE ROOM 119
24"C C.
l // /
PONDED WATER
S, TTooLgVEL
9 FLOOR OF RESERVOIR
,/
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
120 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
kept about 2 in. above the surface of the ponded water to ensure proper
circulation of air.
The storage room requires about 75 Imperial gallons of water to create
a pond 1 89 in. deep at the shallow end. Slimacide V-10, with a pine root
oil base, is added to the circulating water to prevent bacterial growth.
The water is pumped from the reservoir, through a strainer, to the heat
exchanger, as shown in Fig. 6, where it is cooled, then back to the room
t [ ~ i HERMOMETER
SERVO TEMPERATURE
ENSOR
MOTOR THERMOMETER
CHILLED ~
VALVF,I
E Jil I
WATER IL " ~ I ~ HEATEXCHANGER
SUPPLY ~ ~ -~ .j I ;
VALVE ALVE THERMOMETER TEMPERATURE SENSOR
PRESSURE GAUGE
BYPASSVALVE/ / ~'I
WATERFROMROOM
TEMPERATURE / CENTRIFUGAL
SENSOR / PUMP
THERMOMETER ~ !
\STR%ER
DRAIN
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized
BOZOZUK ON TEMPERATURE CONTROLLED HUMID STORAGE ROOM 121
laid out as shown on Fig. 3. The support frames are made of aluminum
angles and the shelves of asbestos sheeting. The design details are given
on Figs. 7 and 8.
ALUMINUM FRAMING
~ IlL'ix I I,/21'X3/f6" THK.
~21 821
===:
I
/ J
~3" -- 112" ASBESTOS SHEETING BOLTED 15, --i 112"
TO SHELF FRAME WtTH 4-I~L20
BOLTS B NUTS',,
35'
14'
_ r ,4 )"
ALUMINUM FRAMING LUMINUM BASE PLAT[ ~
[12" x ~ ~/2" X ~ / 4 II THK. 25"x 3 " x 3/16" THK.
FIG. 8--Worktable.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized
122 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
O
TABLE 1--Effect o f storage on triaxial consolidated anisotropically undrained strengths, measured on undisturbed N
tube samples o f marine clay, obtained from CFS Gloucester, Dec. 196Z c
O
Consolidation Z
Stress, k g / c m ~ Tested, Nov. 1968 Tested, Dec. 1974 -I
Depth, m
+ 0 . 3 ft Oo' o', S, 070 w, 070 y, 6Q, ~s, 07o S, 070 w, ~ r. 6Q, Es, 07o "u
lb/fP kg/cm 2 lb/ft a kg/cmz rn
nn
7.2 0.38 0.24 99.3 80.7 96.4 0.348 0.93 97.8 77.9 96.3 0.300 0.91 c
16.2 0.50 0.31 99.8 52.1 107.6 0.546 1.03 100.3 76.7 96.4 0.273 0.69
m
25.5 0.62 0.39 99.8 85.3 95.4 0.493 0.68 96.5 95.8 90.5 0.460 0.66
36.9 0.76 0.47 99.8 88.7 94.5 0.706 0.56 99.8 84.5 95.6 0.621 0.38 0
0
43.0 0.74 0.51 100.0 79.1 97.3 0.716 1.03 97.1 77.2 96.0 0.812 1.07 z-H
48.8 0.95 0.58 98.9 50.0 108.5 0.818 0.84 96.7 49.8 107.2 0.772 1.23
57.0 1.31 0.75 99.2 70.5 99.7 0.774 0.86 98.9 61.7 102.8 0.650 0.93 0
i-
63.0 1.39 0.86 99.3 35.6 117.8 0.734 0.67 96.8 36.5 115.6 0.672 0.58 r-
m
O
Average
"1"
99.5 67.7 102.1 0.642 0.83 98.0 70.0 100.1 0.570 0.81 C
Change, ~
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
124 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR L A B O R A T O R Y TESTING
5
TAN COLOURED \
FINE SAND AND SILT
DESICCATED GREY-BROWN
I0 SILTY CLAY
SOFT GREY-BROWN SILTY CLAY
WITH OCCASIONAL DECAYEDROOTS,
15 ROOTHOLES, AND SOME SMALL
FLAT STONES
PRECONSOLIDATION PRESSURE
20 SOFT GREYSILTY CLAY WITH MEASURED I TO 4 MONTHS
SOMECLAM SHELLS AFTER SAMPLING
(BOZOZUK AND LEONARDS, 19/21
25 GREY SILTY CLAY WITH
PRECONSOLIDATION PRESSURE, E
SOME SHELLS
MEASURED 5 TO I YEARS
30 AFTER SAMPLING
GREY CLAY WITH BLACK
MOTTLING, AND OCCASIONAL l0 w
% 351 SMALL FLAT STONES CONSOLIDATION TESTS
MEASURED 5 TO 7 YEARS
AFTER SAMPLING
40
45 IN SITU VERTICAL
EFFECTIVE STRESS
[5
50
60 I I I \ I I I I
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
BOZOZUK ON TEMPERATURE CONTROLLED HUMID STORAGE ROOM 125
testing programs were identical and the test specimens were the same size,
the observed reduction in preconsolidation pressure must be attributed to
storage time.
The evidence concerning the detrimental effects of storage time on the
engineering properties of soils is accumulating but is still not entirely
conclusive. Detrimental effects, as noted previously, have been observed
under the best storage conditions, and it is known that a relaxation of
stresses with time may cause changes in soil structure. In planning a soil
testing program, therefore, consolidation, undrained triaxial strength, and
other special engineering tests should be performed as soon as possible
after the samples are obtained. Atterberg limits, grain size analysis, and
other classification or index tests may be performed after long periods of
storage without affecting the results seriously.
Summary
In 1954, a controlled-temperature humid storage room was designed
and constructed in the Geotechnical Laboratory of the Division of Build-
ing Research, National Research Council of Canada. The room is a wood
frame construction, lined completely with sheet copper on the inside. The
desired temperature and humidity are achieved by running water down the
walls to the floor, where it is ponded below a removable floor. Heat gain
into the room is removed by pumping the water through a heat exchanger
fed by chilled water. The paper discusses the design, the preparation of
samples for storage, and the effects that long storage times may have on
test results.
A ckno wledgmen ts
Thanks are due to K. R. Solvason, Research Officer, Building Services
Section, who designed the mechanical plant for the storage room.
This paper is a contribution from the Division of Building Research,
National Research Council of Canada and is published with the approval
of the Director of the Division.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
P. L a Rochelle, ~ J. Sarrailh, ~ M. R o y , 1 a n d F. A . Tavenas ~
REFERENCE: La Rochelle, P., Sarrailh, J., Roy, M., and Tavenas, F. A., "Effect
of Storage and Reconsolidation on the Properties of Champlain Clays," Soil
Specimen Preparation for Laboratory Testing, ASTM STP 599, American Society
for Testing and Materials, 1976, pp. 126-146.
T h e h i s t o r y o f a c l a y s a m p l e p r i o r t o testing m a y have a n a p p r e c i a b l e
effect o n the p r o p e r t i e s o f t h e c l a y m e a s u r e d in the l a b o r a t o r y . I n t h e case
o f the soft sensitive clays, o b s e r v a t i o n s b y d i f f e r e n t a u t h o r s h a v e s h o w n
t h a t t h e s a m p l e s s h o u l d be m a n i p u l a t e d with great c a r e d u r i n g t r a n s p o r -
t a t i o n , p r e p a r a t i o n , a n d t r i m m i n g so as to a v o i d a n y shocks, v i b r a t i o n s ,
o r stress c o n c e n t r a t i o n s , w h i c h a r e b o u n d to d i s t u r b the clay s t r u c t u r e a n d
affect the measured properties.
In spite o f all due p r e c a u t i o n s with regard to m a n i p u l a t i o n , the p r o p -
erties o f the clay s a m p l e s m a y b e altered b y o t h e r p h e n o m e n a , s u c h as
the w a t e r m i g r a t i o n within the s a m p l e . T h a t p r o b l e m was r e c o g n i z e d b y
H v o r s l e v [1]z w h o suggested t h a t " s e r i o u s l y d i s t u r b e d parts o f t h e s a m p l e
Professor, graduate student, and associate professors, respectively, Department of Civil
Engineering, Universit6 Laval, Quebec, Canada.
2The italic numbers in brackets refer to the list of references appended to this paper.
126
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed9 by
Copyright 1976byASTMInternational www.astm.org
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
LA ROCHELLE ET AL ON STORAGE AND RECONSOLIDATION 127
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
128 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
Saint-Aiban
The site o f Saint-Alban is located 80 km from Quebec City at the
northern fringe o f the Champlain clay deposits in that area. The clay
found on that site, which has been described previously in the literature
[8,9], is very soft and sensitive below a desiccated crust 2 m thick; the
strength, measured by means o f a Nilcon vane apparatus, increases from
10 kPa (210 lb/ft 2) below the crust at 2 m depth to 21 kPa (440 lb/ft 2) at
7.5 m depth. As seen f r o m Table 1, the water contents, the limits, the
indices, and the clay contents decrease with depth. In terms of the pre-
vious loads carried by the deposit, the clay is nearly normally consolidated;
Saint-Alban
Saint-Jean-
Soil Properties 2 m depth 7.5 m depth Saint-Louis Vianney
Water content, % 95.0 50 69.0 42.0
Plastic limit, ~ 27.0 20 27.0 18.0
Liquid limit, % 55.0 35 50.0 29.0
Plasticity index, % 28.0 15 23.0 11.0
Liquidity index 2.4 2 1.8 2.2
Clay content, % 80.0 35 80.0 60.0
Sensitivity(by lab. vane) 14.0 22 50.0 >500.0
Field vane strength, kPa 10.0 21 43.0 240.0
pc - po, kPa 18.0 45 102.0 640.0
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
LA ROCHELLE ET AL ON STORAGE AND RECONSOLIDATION 129
Saint-Louis
The properties of the d a y at Saint-Louis, Yamaska, which is located
160 km southwest of Quebec City, have also been discussed in detail in
previous papers [6,11]. The typical values given in Table 1 correspond to
the elevation at which block samples were cut out from a trench dug in
a landslide crater. The clay plasticity on that site is more uniform with
depth than in Saint-Alban, and the vane strength at block level is 43 kPa
(900 lb/ftz). The clay is slightly overconsolidated by previous loads, but
the major part of (pc - po) is estimated to be due to delayed consolidation
and bonding. In terms of undrained strength and bonding, this clay may
be considered representative of the average clay encountered in the Saint-
Laurent lowlands.
Saint-Jean. Vianney
The village of Saint-Jean-Vianney, which was located approximately
200 km north of Quebec City on the northern side of the Saguenay
river valley, was the site of a disastrous landslide in 1971, which was
reported in the literature [12]. In many regards, the clay on that site
is similar to the Toulnustouc clay reported on by Conlon [4]. The typical
properties listed in Table 1 correspond to the elevation of block samples
cut out from a trench dug in the crater of the landslide. The clay is very
stiff, the vane strength being 240 kPa (5000 lb/ft2); it has a low plasticity
and is extremely sensitive. When compared to the average Champlain
clay deposits, the clay at Saint-Jean-Vianney is highly overconsolidated;
the measured preconsolidation pressure at the level of the block samples
is 900 kPa (8.4 T/ft 2) and it is estimated that half the value of (Pc - Po)
given in Table 1 is due to delayed consolidation and bonding.
When comparing the properties measured on the three sites, it becomes
obvious that the clay of Saint-Alban is the least cemented; as a matter of
fact, of all the Champlain clay deposits studied, that clay probably lies
close to the lower end of the scale in terms of intensity of cementation.
As the cementation bonds are believed to prevent swelling following a
stress release, the clay from Saint-Alban was chosen for the study since
it was considered to be the most susceptible to water migration within the
clay samples after sampling. On the other hand, the effect of storage time
on the bonds was evaluated on block samples from the two other sites
where the cementation is more important.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorize
130 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
4
E
6
~~c I tube somples
1 (lower level )
7
o vane I
9 - o vane 2
e,--e average
,o I i
FIG. l--Undrained strength profile at Saint-Alban.
the useable length o f sample was on the order of 80 cm per tube. Five
tubes were taken at depths between 2.1 and 3.0 m, and nine tubes were
between 6.1 and 7.0 m.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
LA ROCHELLE El" AL ON STORAGE AND RECONSOLIDATION 131
ameter of 3.8 cm and a height of 7.6 cm. A press, a triaxial cell, and the
necessary equipment for extruding and trimming the samples were
installed in a shanty on the site, so as to make compression tests im-
mediately after sampling.
In order to study the effect of short storage time on the undrained
strength, four series of tests were made on the samples taken at the two
different levels:
All compression tests in the field and in the laboratory were made by
the same operator, using the same apparatus. It may be worthwhile to
mention that the so-called paraffined samples were, in fact, wrapped
in plastic films which were sandwiched between layers of a mixture of
paraffin and vaseline; this technique was found to be very efficient in
preventing any measurable loss or gain of moisture during storage periods
of more than three years in a humid room.
Comparison o f the Results--When comparing the results in such a
study, problems arise due to the variation of strength of the specimens,
even when tested under exactly the same conditions. In the present case,
two types of variations are encountered: the first one is the natural
variation of the undrained strength profile along the length of the tubes,
and the second is the variability in the quality of the tube samples and
also of the specimens within one tube, resulting from the disturbance due
to the sampling operation.
Strength Profile--From previous studies in Saint-Alban, the strength pro-
files are known to be fairly uniform throughout the site; nevertheless,
two vane profiles were determined 2 m apart in the central part of the
sampling area, and the results are given in Fig. 1. It is seen that both
profiles coincide fairly well. On the same figure, the positions of the tube
samples have been drawn for the two levels studied; it may be observed
that the vane strength varies by an appreciable amount in the depth in-
crease, corresponding to the length of the tubes. At the upper level, the
vane strength is 10 kPa (210 lb/ft 2) at the elevation of the top of the tube
and 12.5 kPa (260 lb/ft 2) at the elevation of the bottom, thus increasing
by 25 percent. At the lower level, there is an increase in strength of about
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
132 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
15 percent from the top to the middle of the tube sample and then a
slight decrease in the bottom half.
In order to make the strength results of the compression tests com-
parable, they were all referred to the vane strength measured at the
elevation of the specimens within the tube and were expressed by the
ratio C~
c~, = c . ~ / c . (l)
where C~r is the undrained shear strength given by the unconfined com-
pression test at failure, and C,v is the vane strength measured at the same
elevation.
The vane strength was taken as a reference because it indicated, in a
very consistent manner, the variation of undrained strength along the
profile. Any elaborate discussion on the significance and value of the
vane strength is beyond the scope of the present paper.
Variability o f the Quality o f Samples--In spite of all the care taken
during the sampling operations in the field, there is an appreciable
variation in the quality of the samples obtained in such deposits of soft
sensitive clays. Figure 2 gives the results of unconfined compression tests
strength ratio, Cfv
top 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1,8
, !
2 f
~ tube I
}- 4 I I / '
f
i
/
-- [
bo~'m
FIG. 2--Variability of the quality of tube samples.
made on specimens trimmed from two tubes taken in two adjacent holes
at the lower depth (Fig 1). It may be seen that the results from Tube I
are much higher than those from Tube H, although the field technique,
the sampling apparatus, the operators, and the testing method were the
same for both tubes. Moreover, the strength of the specimens within the
same tube sample varies appreciably, depending on the position of the
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized
LA ROCHELLE ET AL ON STORAGE AND RECONSOLIDATION 133
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authori
O
w
r-
Series m
"u
A B C D
Sampling m
-u
Choice of Tests Level Na C/~ avg N C~ avg N C/v avg N C/~ avg
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
LA ROCHELLE ET AL ON STORAGE AND RECONSOLIDATION 135
Series A and in the laboratory for Series B, the identical results confirm
that the testing conditions were comparable. The strength values obtained
in Series C are appreciably lower, by about 17 percent, than in Series A
and B; in this case, the samples were extruded and paraffined on the field,
and they were trimmed only one week later, just before being tested in
the laboratory. Thus it would seem that under the conditions of complete
stress release, and given sufficient time, the undrained strength may be
affected by water migration within the sample. However, if the con-
fining stresses are not released completely, the effect on the strength does
not seem to be as important. This is illustrated by the fact that the
strength measured in Series D is only about 5 percent lower than in Series
A and B and about 12 percent higher than in Series C; in Series D, the
samples were left in the stainless steel tubes and stored in the humid room
for two weeks or more before being tested. It should be noted that the
internal clearance ratio of the tubes is very small, on the order of 0.25
percent, and could then efficiently confine the samples.
These data show a strong indication that the strength of a clay sample
decreases appreciably in a short time after sampling, when stored under
conditions of complete stress release; following the observations made by
other authors [1,2], it is reasoned that water migration within the sample
might be responsible for that decrease.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authoriz
CO
6o
0
t--
co
TABLE 3--Water content measurements across samples (from Saint-AIban).
nl
Dates o f Water
rrl
Tube No. Depth, m Sampling Extrusion Content Wo~ a(w~ - Wo) wi a A(w, - w~) w~a A(wc - wo) z
..~
N' 6.1 21/0 6/ 74 24/06/74 24/06/74 69.2 -1.5 67.7 -0.6 67.1 -2.1
m
67.7 -0.6 67.1 +0.7 68.8 + 1.1
M 2.1 21/06/74 24/06/74 24/06/74 66.8 -0.8 66.0 +0.9 66.9 +0.1
62.5 +0.4 62.9 -0.6 62.3 -0.2 -t
M' 6.1 21/06/74 13/07/74 13/07/74 70.2 0.0 70.2 -0.3 69.9 -0.3 z
69.3 +0.5 69.8 + 0.3 70.1 + 0.2
C-4-6 4.0 20/1 0/ 72 29/ 01 /73 07/ 01/ 75 73.3 + 0.3 73.6 +0.6 74.2 +0.9
. . . . . . 70.3 -0.6 69.7 . ..
C-26-5 5.6 12/09/72 18/10/72 07/01/75 65.0 + 2.2 67.7 - 1.3 66.4 + 1.4
51.1 + 0.3 51.4 - 1.9 49.5 - 1.6
B-12-G 4.3 05/06/73 12/06/73 07/ 01/ 75 51.2 +0.9 52.1 -0.1 52.0 +0.8
-.I
51.5 +0.4 51.9 - 1.8 50.1 - 1.4 0
-<
awo = water content o f the outer 5-mm ring, we = water content o f the 3-cm-diameter central core, and ..q
wl = water content o f the intermediate ring. t'rl
6o
---I
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
LA ROCHELLE ET AL ON STORAGE AND RECONSOLIDATION 137
Influence of Reconsolidation
It is generally agreed that the detrimental effect of water migration and
of some limited sampling disturbance may be remedied partly by recon-
solidating the samples to the in situ stresses [2]. The beneficial effect
of reconsolidation is twofold: first, it squeezes out the excess water
resulting from swelling, and second, it restores the effective stresses
which were acting in the soil element in nature.
The main difficulty of such a procedure lies in the choice of the correct
stress values corresponding to the field stresses. In order to do so, the
value of the coefficient of earth pressure at rest, Ko, should be known;
however, that coefficient remains one of the most elusive parameters of
clay deposits. Many methods have been suggested for the determination
of the Ko values; a recent study [14], comparing different methods of
Ko measurements made on the clay deposits of Salnt-Alban, has shown
that the Ko value may be taken anywhere between 0.4 and 1.2, a probable
lower limit being 0.56.
For the purpose of studying the influence of reconsolidation on the clay
of Saint-Alban, three types of tests were made:
1. Unconsolidated undrained (UU) tests under confinement pressures
equal to half the total vertical overburden pressure.
2. Isotropically consolidated undrained (CIU) tests, with isotropical
consolidation pressures equal to 0.8 times the vertical effective overburden
pressure.
3. Anisotropically consolidated undrained (CAU) tests, with vertical
and horizontal consolidation pressures equal to 1.0 and 0.56 times the
vertical effective overburden pressure, respectively.
In the CIU tests, the consolidation pressures were kept below the
vertical effective overburden pressure to prevent any overstressing of the
clay structure [15] which could affect greatly the strength parameters.
For the CAU tests, a K value of 0.56 was arbitrarily adopted, as this
value corresponds to the modified [16] Jaky's expression (0.95 - sin
d~r'), where ~,' is the friction angle measured on remolded clay. All
tests were made at the same controlled strain rate of 0.3 mm/min.
From the results given in Table 4, the following observations may be
made:
1. The UU tests give strength values (C~, Table 4) which are generally
higher than those obtained by unconfined compression tests (C~, Table
2).
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
138 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
II
~o
8
_o
x
o 7
13_
~6
b
J
b-~
o
o 2 4 6 8 I0 12
E,deforrnation,%
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
LA ROCHELLE ET AL ON STORAGE AND RECONSOLIDATION 139
T
_0
x
0 2 4 6 8 I0 12
~, d6formation, %
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
140 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
LA ROCHELLE ET AL ON STORAGE AND RECONSOLIDATION 141
Undrained Strength
In order to examine whether the undrained strength has been affected
by the long period of storage time, CIU tests were performed under
exactly the same testing conditions as similar tests which were made on
adjacent blocks, within a few weeks after sampling. The CIU tests were
chosen, as they are considered to be an efficient means of evaluating the
intensity of bonding in cemented clays [4,6,18]. From the comparative
results given in Table 5, the following observations may be made:
1. The change of volume during consolidation has increased con-
siderably and has more than doubled in some cases; this may be indicative
of a certain weakening of the clay structure.
2. The deviator stress at failure (ol - o3)t has decreased by 10 to 15
percent for Saint-Louis clay and by 14 to 21 percent for Saint-Jean-
Vianney.
3. The strain at failure ~r has increased appreciably in the case of Saint-
Louis but not in the case of Saint-Jean-Vianney.
4. The pore pressure generated by shear deformation has a tendency
to be lower at failure for the Saint-Louis clays.
Figure 5 gives the stress-strain and pore pressure curves obtained from
CIU tests performed on block and tube samples after five months of
storage by Lefebvre [19] and on block samples after six years of storage;
this comparison indicates that the effect of storage is somewhat similar
to the disturbance resulting from tube sampling but not as severe.
Consolidation Characteristics
The consolidation characteristics, and especially the preconsolidation
pressure pc, may be considered as an indication of the presence of cemen-
tation bonds in the sensitive clays, where the magnitude of pc is appreciably
larger than the maximum load which has ever been carried by the soil
element. The consolidation curves of cemented clays are characterized
by a well-defined knee at pressures corresponding to Pc; the better the
sample quality, the more pronounced the knee. Hence, any appreciable
change in the shape of the consolidation curve and in the value of Pc
would be an indication of alteration or disturbance of the soil sample.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
...g
4~
PO
Oo
o
r'-
Go
-o
m
o_
TABLE 5--1nfluence o f storage on CIU tests. m
z
Date of Date of (ol - oa)j, "10
20
Site Sampling Test oo ', kPa AVJV, % kPa eI, ~ u/, kPa m
"1o
1969 69 0.3 132 0.9 48 2o
1974 69 0.7 112 1.5 35 --I
Saint-Louis summer 1969 83 -- 131 1.1 56 6
1968 1974 83 2.3 112 1.3 32 z
1969 103 1.7 129 1.0 60
1974 103 2.6 116 1.2 56 8-n
1971 103 1.1 703 0.7 101
1974 103 1.3 554 0.8 85
Saint-Jean-Vianney summer 1971 345 1.1 831 1.0 258 O
1971 1974 345 2.6 712 0.8 255
1971 483 1.4 931 0.6 310 --4
O
1974 483 3.4 777 0.7 331
-<
"-4
t'tl
0~
--4
T~
fi)
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
LA ROCHELLE ET AL ON STORAGE A N D RECONSOLIDATION 143
200
I
ST-LOUIS
180
I
160
140
n~ 12o
-~ moo
g
_L ;I =L~..~ . . . . .
',F I _..-
b-
60
4t'
IJ--; h / ~ -
40
20
g ,
lq~,c~ClU (block)
' v-'~CIU(tube)
(C~_O-3)Au
o
o
9
9
1974 CIU(block) = ,L
0 I I
0 I 2 3 4 5 6
e, deformotlon,%
FIG. 5--Comparison between CIU tests on block sample after storage with C I U tests
on block and tube samples made after sampling by Lefebvre [19].
Preconsolidation
Date of Pressure-pc,
Site Sampling Date of Test No. of Tests kPa
1.4
1.5
1.2
I.I
o
>o
I0
09
0.8
FIG. 6----Comparison of consolidation curves from block samples before and after storage
period.
Conclusion
The present paper is a report on a study o f the influence o f recon-
solidation and storage time on the strength and consolidation character-
istics o f sensitive cemented clays from eastern Canada. From the data
presented, the following tentative conclusions are suggested.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
LA ROCHELLE ET AL ON STORAGE AND RECONSOLIDATION 145
Acknowledgments
The field and laboratory work reported in this paper were carried out
by J. Sarrailh, graduate student. The help of J. P. Dussault, J. Y. Julien,
S. Par6, and M. Pouliot, technicians, is appreciated greatly. This investi-
gation was carried out with the financial support of the Ministry of Edu-
cation of the Province of Quebec and the National Research Council of
Canada.
References
[1] Hvorslev, J., "Subsurface Exploration and Sampling of Soils for Civil Engineering
Purposes," Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Miss., 1949, pp. 163-164.
[2] Bjerrum, L. "Problems of Soil Mechanics and Construction on Soft Clays," State-
of-the-Art Report to Session IV, 8th International Conference on Soil Mech~ics and
Foundation Engineering, Moscow, Vol. 3, 1973, pp. 1l 1-159.
[3] Crawford, C. B., Geotechnique, Vol. 13, No. 2, 1963, pp. 132-146.
[4] Conlon, R. J., Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 3, No. 3, 1966, pp. 113-144.
[5] Mitchell, R. J., Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 7, No. 3, 1970, pp. 297-312.
[6] La Rochelle, P. and Lefebvre, G. in Sampling of Soil and Rock, ASTM STP 483,
American Society for Testing and Materials, 1971, pp. 143-163.
[7] Sangrey, D. A., Geotechnique, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 139-152.
[8] Tavenas, F. A., Chapeau, C., La Rochelle, P., and Roy, M., Canadian Geo-
technical Journal, Vol. 11, No. 1, 1974, pp. 109-141.
[9] La Rochelle, P., Trak, B., Travenas, F. A., and Roy, M., Canadian Geotechnical
Journal, Vol. 11, No. 1, 1974, pp. 142-164.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
146 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
[10] Bjerrum, L., Geotechnique, Vol. 17, No. 2, 1967, pp. 83-119.
[11] Lefebvre, G. and La Rochelle, P., Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 11, No. 1,
1974, pp. 89-108.
[12] Tavenas, F. A., Chagnon, J. Y., and La Rochelle, P., Canadian Geotechnical
Journal, Vol. 8, No. 3, 1971, pp. 463-478.
[13] La Rochelle, P., discussion on the State-of-the-Art Report to Session IV, 8th Inter-
national Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Vol. 4.2, Moscow,
1973, pp. 102-108.
[14] Tavenas, F. A., Blanchette, G., Leroueil, S., Roy, M., and La Rochefie P., "Dif-
ficulties in the In Situ Determination of Ko in Soft Sensitive Clays," Specialty Con-
ference on In Situ Measurement of Soil Properties, American Society of Civil Engineers,
Raleigh, N.C., June 1975, Vol. 1, pp. 450--476.
[15] Raymond, G. P., Townsend, D. L., and Lojkasek, M. J., Canadian Geotechnical
Journal, Vol. 8, No. 4, 1971, pp. 546-557.
[16] Brooker, E. W. and Ireland, H. O., Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 2, No. 1,
1965, pp. 1-15.
[17] Bozozuk, M. in Sampling of Soil and Rock, A S T M STP 483, American Society for
Testing and Materials, 1971, pp. 121-131.
[18] Lo, K. Y. and Morin, J. P., Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 9, No. 3, 1972,
pp. 261-277.
[19] Lefebvre, G., "Contribution h l'~tude de la stabilit6 des pentes dans les argiles
ciment6es," Ph.D. thesis, Universitd Laval, Qu6bec, Canada, 1970.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
J. K. Torrance'
REFERENCE: Torrance, J. K., "Pore Water Extraction and the Effect of Sample
Storage on the Pore Water Chemistry of Leda Clay," Soil Specimen Preparation for
Laboratory Testing, ASTM STP 599, American Society for Testing and Materials,
1976, pp. 147-157.
KEY WORDS: soils, tests, clays, water chemistry, moisture content, storage pro-
cedures
147
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by ASTM International www.astm.org
Copyright 9 1976by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
148 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
TORRANCE ON PORE WATER CHEMISTRY OF LEDA CLAY 149
Soil Material
The soil material used in this investigation was taken in September 1974
from the site of the landslide of May 1973, north of Chelsea, Quebec. The
Shelby tube samples were taken by hand from the base of the scarp at the
side of the landslide scar. All samples were obtained from 10 to 12 ft below
the surface and from an area measuring approximately 1 by 3 ft. The
natural water content of the soil was normally between 55 and 65 percent
(although higher and lower values were observed), the liquid limit ranged
from 37 to 41 percent, and the plastic limit from 21 to 25 percent. Sensi-
tivity, determined by the fall cone method, was between 10 and 20. This
low value for the sensitivity was the result of the soil material coming from
a near-surface location, in which it had been mildly affected by weathering.
This weathering has caused an increase in the remolded shear strength.
Storage Procedures
Standard storage techniques and some modifications of standard methods
were tested to assess the amount of change which occurred in the pore
water chemistry. The following storage procedures were used:
1. Left in the original Shelby tube.
2. Aluminum foil wrapped and waxed.
3. Plastic film wrapped and waxed.
4. Waxed only.
5. Extruded and placed in sealed plastic container with a nitrogen
atmosphere.
6. Extruded, wrapped in plastic film, and placed in a sealed plastic
container with a nitrogen atmosphere.
7. Extruded, and placed in a sealed plastic container with an air
atmosphere.
For all treatments except Treatment 1, the soil was extruded from the
sample tube Within four days of sampling.
Four inch samples of soil were used in each test. Before being prepared
for storage, a slice of soil was taken along the full length of each segment.
The surface of this slice, which had been in contact with the tube, was
removed by scraping, and the remainder was subdivided lengthwise to allow
water content determination on one portion and pore water extraction
from the other. This procedure allowed the initial water content and pore
water chemistry of the sample to be determined for comparison with the results
obtained after storage.
Samples prepared in the manner described were stored under conditions
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
150 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
tcm
I I
/ I/
-rubber gasket
- dental dam
- s a m p l e chamber
-connecting bolt
-protective filter paper
T
to test tube
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
TORRANCE ON PORE WATER CHEMISTRY OF LEDA CLAY 151
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized
152 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
i 1 cm I
~. . . . . . . . . . . . . plunger
[ ~'~::'J" . . . . O-rings
FIG. 2--Mechanical pore water press--all materials are steel unless otherwise indicated.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
TABLE l--Chemical analysis of pore waterfor Leda clay samples from Chelsea, Quebec at beginning of experiments and after three months storage.
2:
Storage 3 3 3 3 O
Tempera- 3 Initial, Months, Change, Initial, Months, Change, Initial, Months, Change, Initial, Months, Change, ITI
Treatment ture Initial Months ppm ppm ~ ppm ppm 07o ppm ppm ~ ppm ppm ~ 0
z
Shelby tube, ends waxed (4 49.6 18.8 48 26 40
"o
samples from tube) 48.7 19.5 57 31 33 0
7 70.5 16 to 34 22.5 14 to 25 55 7 to 12 27 17 to 22 31 ~o
64.2 16.5 36 15 24 m
..k
ol
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
154 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions auth
TORRANCE ON PORE WATER CHEMISTRY OF LEDA CLAY 155
chemical change during storage. The improvement was marginal, but the
degree of change appears to be somewhat more consistent. Likewise, the
samples which were only waxed exhibited considerable change, some of
which may be attributable to water loss.
The other storage procedures tested all involved storage of the samples
in air-tight plastic containers. This types of storage might be used with
sample trimmings or with material after other tests have been performed.
In all cases, evaporation-condensation processes resulted in loss of water
from the soil (as evidenced by free water in the container), even though
water was not lost from the container. The wrapping of the sample in
plastic to inhibit water transfer and the presence of the nitrogen atmosphere
to inhibit oxidation reactions gave no improvement over storage with air.
With all the samples stored in the containers there was a dramatic increase
in the amount of calcium and magnesium in the pore water. The change
cannot be explained by the water transfer within the container and is prob-
ably related to attack on the carbonates which are present in the soil. Long
term storage in plastic containers cannot be recommended. It is not known
whether storage in sealed glass jars would be superior.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
156 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
that are most susceptible to chemical alteration during storage. Since the
precise relationship between s0il behavior and pore water chemistry for the
Leda clays has not been established, it must be assumed that these changes
in pore water chemistry during storage may be of importance.
Knowledge as to the role of chemical factors in Leda clay behavior is
limited. The relationships and interactions that occur between the various
chemical elements and the soil are complicated. Preliminary laboratory
investigations with chemical additions to Leda clay and investigations of the
in situ chemistry of Leda clay give promise of leading to a more complete
understanding of the behavior of this soil [6, 7]. Much more work is needed
on the relationships between chemical and physical factors and the soil
behavior as observed in the field and laboratory. In this regard, the author
recommends that more investigators assess the chemical, mineralogical,
and physical nature of the specimens that are tested. Pore water chemistry
investigations should take place as soon as possible after the sample is
obtained if in situ chemical information is desired. If research is being
performed, knowledge of the chemical state of the soil should be obtained.
The chemical investigations should be carried out at the beginning of the
experiment on a sample of soil immediately adjacent to the specimen tested
(to obtain initial chemical data), and on the specimen itself after the test
is completed (to determine if changes have occurred during testing).
The results presented in this paper suggest that pore water chemistry
should be assessed as soon as possible after the sample is obtained from
the field and that, if storage is necessary, the sample should be wrapped
with aluminum foil or plastic wrap and sealed with wax. It is preferable that
the sample be stored under refrigerated conditions. Evaporation of pore
water during and after extraction should be kept to a minimum. The
unpredictable and nonreproduceable nature of the chemical change during
storage must be emphasized.
Preliminary experiments with certain Leda clays and the experience from
Norway indicate that relatively small differences in pore water chemistry
can lead to differences in the remolded behavior of this type of soil. Only
with good chemical and engineering data on a large number of samples
can the actual relationships be determined.
A ckn o wledgm en ts
The author wishes to acknowledge the support of the National Research
Council of Canada and the assistance of L. Cowe in the laboratory portion
of this investigation.
References
[1] Bjerrum, L., Geotechnique, Vol. 4, 1954, pp. 49-69.
[2] Mourn, J., L6ken, T., and Torrance, J. K., Geotechnique, VoL 21, 1971, pp. 329-340.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
TORRANCE ON PORE WATER CHEMISTRY OF LEDA CLAY 157
[3] Moum, J, L6ken, T., and Torrance, J. K., Geotechnique, Vol. 22, 1972, pp. 675-676.
[4] Penner, E., Canadian Journal of Earth Science, Vol. 2, 1965, pp. 425-441.
[5] Sangrey, D. A. and Paul, M. J., Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 8, 1971, pp.
315-335.
[6] Torrance, J. K., Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 12, 1975, pp. 326-335.
[7] Torrance, J. K., "Leaching, Weathering, and Origin of Leda Clay in the Ottawa Area,"
Guelph Symposium on Geomorpholoty, in press.
[8] Torrance, J. K., Geotechnique, Vol. 24, 1974, pp. 155-173.
[9] Shainberg, I., Proceedings, Soil Science Society of America, Vol. 38, 1973, pp. 689-694.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
D. A . Sangrey, ~ D. K. N o o n a n , 2 and G. S. W e b b 2
KEY WORDS: soils, tests, Atterberg limits, liquid limit, soil hydration, swelling, clay
minerals
158
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed9 by
Copyright 1976byASTMIntemational www.astm.org
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
SANGREY ET AL ON SPECIMEN PREPARATION 159
3The association of water to a clay soil is very complicated. Some water is quite free and
mobile while other water is attracted, in varying degrees, to the clay particle. Still other
water is strongly a part of the clay crystal structure. As the water content of a soil changes,
especially as it is dried, all of the modes of associated water are affected, each to differing
degrees, depending on the conditions of temperature, water content, time, etc. Obviously the
detailed explanation of the results of this test program would involve this complicated
problem. However, the main point of this work is to describe the effects of drying. Empha-
sis on explanations for these effects, especially hypotheses about the reasons, is unnecessary.
For this reason, in the paper, the terms dehydration and rehydration will be used to cover
the entire spectrum of water content changes.
*The italic numbers in brackets refer to the list of references appended to this paper.
Communication of test results by S. G. Samuels, Building Research Station, England and
J. Pruntel, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
160 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
are recognized as not only a means of soil classification, but also a rela-
tively inexpensive method for estimating engineering characteristics of
strength and compressibility [9]. Since the engineering application usually
involves a naturally moist soil, it is reasonable to determine the liquid
limit working from natural water content rather than from air-dried soil,
as specified by ASTM. Certainly many engineering organizations and
laboratories are currently testing from the natural water content in spite
of the standard. It is also noteworthy that the British Standards Institu-
tion modified its original specification for liquid limit testing, which had
been similar to ASTM's, to one permitting either naturally moist or rehy-
drated soils [10].
Two separate questions are at issue here, each with its own implications
in terms of the present standards. The first is how long it takes for an air-
dried soil to rehydrate to some reasonably constant condition as far as the
liquid limit test is concerned. I f dehydration-rehydration is simply a re-
versible, but time dependent, phenomenon, and if it is desirable to test a
soil when more or less at equilibrium within this process, then it is suffi-
cient to specify a rehydration time long enough to reach this condition.
Such a rational is implicit in arguments like those of Winslow and Gates
[2] and the current check test procedure of ASTM Method D 423-66
where a specific 24-h rehydration time is specified.
A second question of perhaps even more significance is: to what degree
will soils respond irreversibly to dehydration; in which case, any length of
time for rehydration would not reproduce the natural soil behavior.
Test Program
In an attempt to answer these questions, series of tests were run in
which several different soils were subjected to drying and rewetting. The
liquid limits were measured over a period of up to two months time for
rehydration.
A summary of the characteristics of these soils is presented in Table 1.
Specimens 1 and 3 occurred naturally in deposits of marine or estuarine
silty clay in the Ottawa and St. Lawrence River systems of Eastern Canada,
respectively. They are representatives of the sensitive, naturally cemented,
Leda-type clays. Specimens 2 and 5 were from deposits of normally con-
solidated, post-glacial, varved fresh water lake clays; both were taken in
Eastern Ontario near to Kingston and New Liskeard, respectively. Specimen
4 was a lightly overconsolidated material from the Great Lakes basin near
Lake St. Clair, while the final specimen was of Cretaceous age Bearpaw
shale from Saskatchewan. The liquid and plastic limits listed in Table 1
were obtained by testing soils that had not been air dried but were wetted
directly from the natural water content.
Results of mineral analysis using X-ray diffraction are listed in Table 2.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
{D
TABLE 1--Identification characteristics of soils tested.
Z
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
162 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
SANGREY ET A L ON SPECIMEN PREPARATION 163
70
wL
PARKWAY (LEDA CLAY)-AIR 9
z I & 9 9
LU 50 -
F- I I| "1" ? §
Z
0 I
o
r~ 40 -
hi
I--
<
30 =Wp
20-
t5 L I I
I I0 I00 I000
REHYDRATION TIME-HOURS
FIG. 1--Liquid limits measured for rehydrating Specimen 1, Parkway soil (note changes
with additional cycle o f drying of the oven dried soil after 60 h).
70
I
I.- 50
z
hi
I'--
Z
0 40
0
(Z:
ILl
NL ,, .I,.
I--
'< 30 4- 4, Ilk '1" '@ i 6 9 4. ;_
4- v
20
9Wp
15 I I I
I I0 I00 I000
REHYDRATION TIME-HOURS
FIG. 2--Liquid limits measured for rehydrating Specimen 2, New Liskeard clay.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authori
164 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
80
LOUISEVILLE (LEDA CLAY)- AIR 9
-w L
70 LOUISEVILLE (LEDA CLAY)-OVEN +-
60
I-
Z
MJ 50
I.-
z
0
tt,- 4-0
I.LI
I,-
,<
30
wp
20
15
I I I 1
I IO I00 I000
REHYDRATION TIME-HOURS
80
I 60
I,-
Z
WJ
l--
50
Z
0
0
Iv
40
I,LI
I.--
30
: +" 9 : $ $ ; : .
wL
20 m
--Wp
15 1 I I
I IO IOO I000
REHYDRATION TIME-HOURS
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
SANGREY ET AL ON SPECIMEN PREPARATION 165
80
60
I
t-
z
LLJ 50
D--
Z
0
0
WL w ,~ 9 9 -
-
r~ 40
§ + + 4- I I I + +
p-
,<
30
Wp
20
15 I I J I
I I0 I00 I000
REHYDRATION TIME-HOURS
150
130
I10
r
z
IJJ wL
I,- 90
Z
0
0
70
bJ
t.-
<
50
BEARPAW SHALE-AIR e"
BEARPAW SHALE-OVEN +
30
wp
I0 - - I I I I
I I0 I00 I000
REHYDRATION TIME-HOURS
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
166 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
dation stresses even though remaining saturated seems obvious from these
data, and a rehydration time is necessary in order to ensure that some
consistent measurement of the liquid limit is possible. Because of the low
permeability of the Bearpaw shale, the time effects, whether rehydrating
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized
SANGREY ET AL ON SPECIMEN PREPARATION 167
Conclusions
There are important implications for the present standard of ASTM
Test for Liquid Limit of Soils (D 423-66) in light of the variabilities re-
viewed in this paper. Without question, it is important that a standard
method be as simple as possible and not require excessive time for speci-
men preparation or the test itself. If long time periods were prescribed,
they would, no doubt, be ignored by most testing groups. This would
seem to preclude a change in the present standard to allow for the hydra-
tion times of several weeks that appear to be necessary for most air-dried
soils.
If correlations between engineering behavior of natural soil and the
Atterberg limits are to be meaningful, then the irreversible changes
brought about by drying, as illustrated in most of the specimens tested,
are very significant. As reflected in the British Standards [10], the logical
solution to this problem is to prescribe testing of nondried specimens.
On the other hand, specimen handling and preparation is greatly simpli-
fied if the soil is dry. There may also be instances when it is desirable to
reduce soils to some common state by eliminating extraneous factors in-
herent in the natural material (although the author cannot imagine where
this would really be beneficial). In either case, a method of dry prepara-
tion such as ASTM D 421 is warranted.
In summary, it is necessary that the present standard for ASTM Test
for Liquid Limit of Soils (D 423-66) be changed to provide the option of
testing nondried soil specimens. Such a standard would require a descrip-
tion of the procedure of specimen preparation as part of the reporting of
the liquid limit. A similar change for the plastic limit, ASTM Test for
Plastic Limit and Plasticity Index of Soils, (D 424-59) (1965)) is probably
also justified.
Regardless of the method of test, it is important that engineers recog-
nize the variability of soils as they are dehydrated and rehydrated, es-
pecially with respect to the Atterberg limits. This is particularly important
when irreversible changes result.
Acknowledgments
An ASTM Grant-in-Aid award to the senior author, while on the Staff
of Queen's University at Kingston, supported part of the research re-
ported herein. The assistance of Dr. R. H. M. van de Graaff in soil
mineral analysis and interpretation is gratefully acknowledged.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
168 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
References
[1] Casagrande, A., Public Roads, Vol. 13, 1932, p. 121.
[2] Winslow, J. D. and Gates, G. R., Materials Research and Standards, Vol. 3, 1963, p.
205.
[3] Muller-Von Moos, M. in Proceedings, International Conference on Soil Mechanics and
Foundation Engineering, Vol. I, 1965, p. 17.
[4] Grim, R. E., Applied Clay Mineralogy, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1962.
[5] van Schuylenborgh, J., Journal of Agricultural Science, Vol. 2, 1954, p. 17.
[6 "Soils of the Humin Tropics," Committee on Tropical Soils, Agricultural Board and
National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C., 1972.
[7] Frost, R. K. in Proceedings, First Southeast Asian Conference on Tropical Soils,
Bangkok, 1967, p. 43.
[8] Remillon, A., "Stabilization of Laterite Soils," Bulletin 108, Highway Research Board,
1955, p. 96.
[9] Terzaghi, K. and Peak, R. B., Soil Mechanics in Engineering Practice, Wiley, New
York, 1968.
[lt)] Methods of Test for Soil Classification and Compaction, British Standards Institution,
1968.
[11] Torrance, J. K., discussion in Engineering Geology, Vol. 4, p. 353.
[12] Sangrey, D. A., Geotechnique, Vol. 22, No. l, p. 139.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
Arshud Mahmood,' J. K. Mitchell, 2 and Ulf Lh~dblom 3
169
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed
Copyright9 1976 byby ASTMInternational www.astm.org
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
170 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
Scope
As prior tests have already shown that specimen preparation effects are
significant in influencing the fabric and properties of a sand with elongate,
angular particles [1,2], 4 a material that was likely to be far less suscep-
tible to such behavior was used for the present study: Monterey No. 0
sand, a medium beach sand with rounded and only slightly elongate parti-
cles. The effect of vibratory compaction on fabric and properties was com-
pared with the effects of specimen preparation by pluviation by charac-
terizing the particle arrangements and measuring compressibility in a spe-
ciaUy fabricated oedometer. ,The lateral stresses during compression were
also measured.
Soil Fabric
The term fabric describes the basic framework or arrangement of in-
dividual constituents of an assemblage consisting of different components.
A comprehensive description of the fabric of a soil sample [3,4,5] would
involve reconstruction of a complex, three-dimensional spatial arrange-
ment of individual grains, multigrained units, and pores. In biological and
material sciences, the principles of stereology have long been applied in
studying the internal structure of many objects by looking at thin slices or
sections [6, 7]. Thin sections and broken, ground, or polished surfaces can
be studied in several ways, depending upon the type and extent of informa-
tion required and the nature and grain size of material being studied [8].
Observation by means of optical [9] or electron microscopes [10-14] has
been employed. Impregnation with resins has been used for friable or cohe-
sionless soils such as sands [2,15]. Arrangement and planar displacements
can also be measured by X-radiography [16].
If the soil grains have shapes such that their geometrical axes coincide
with the crystal axes, then some property of the mineral crystals can be
used to define the particle arrangement, without having to define the
4The italic numbersin brackets refer to the list of referencesappendedto this paper.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
MAHMOOD ET AL ON PREPARATION METHODS FOR SAND 171
One-Dimensional Compressibility
Although compressibility characterized in the field by such means as the
standard penetration test (through relationships with relative density) and
static cone bearing capacity [26] may provide a basis for reasonable settle-
ment predictions in specific cases, oedometer results obtained from labo-
ratory prepared specimens are important in understanding factors con-
trolling the compressibility behavior of sands. Laboratory measurements
of one-dimensional compressibility of sands may also be useful for obtain-
ing settlement estimates of foundations in situations where it can be
assumed that no lateral strain occurs [27], provided correct density and
fabric can be reproduced. Evaluation of relative density is susceptible to
several errors [28], and fabric is even more difficult to evaluate. Measure-
ments of one-dimensional compressibility can be used to characterize non-
linear stress-strain behavior [29,30] and to estimate footing settlements [31].
Measurement
Many of the data on one-dimensional compressibility of sands have
been obtained in conjunction with laboratory studies of at-rest radial earth
pressures. Both types of studies necessitate equipment that permits little
or no lateral deformation of the specimen [32]. Two types of equipment
have generally been used: oedometers and triaxial cells. The oedometers can
either be of a null design [33] or can be allowed to undergo small lateral
deformations [34]. One method of characterizing the effect of lateral
deformation on measured axial strains and radial stresses is by using a
range of oedometer ring thicknesses [35].
The triaxial tests have mostly been an improvement upon and variation
of the procedure suggested by Bishop and Henkel [36]. In some recent
studies, Ko triaxial tests were used to study compressibility [37,38].
Experimental Investigation
Equipment
It was desired to study the compressibility of sands in an apparatus that
would: (a) offer minimum side friction, as large side friction affects meas-
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
172 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
surements of lateral stresses [32]; (b) permit a specimen size tall enough
for mid-height measurements to be free of the end effects that cause errors
in data from short samples [39]; and (c) possess enough lateral rigidity to
permit horizontal stress measurements with very small radial deformations.
An apparatus of the Swedish ring compressionmeter type was fabricated.
These devices are oedometers that are easily compressible in the vertical
direction but possess considerable lateral rigidity. Larger devices, based
on similar principles, have been used in the study of crushed rock [40,41],
and have provided excellent compressibility results. In these earlier investi-
gations, the values of lateral stresses could not be recorded properly due
to low sensitivity of the measurement techniques, and it is believed that an
improvement has been effected in this respect in the present investigation.
The ring device fabricated for the present study was 102 mm inside
diameter and 136 mm high and is shown schematically in Fig. 1. It was
~Neoprene
3m cork
plan
Elevation
FIG. l--Schematic drawing of ring chamber.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
MAHMOOD ET AL ON PREPARATION METHODS FOR SAND 173
three of the steel rings were made into load cells by mounting strain gages
around their perimeters. The strain gages consisted of 8 mutually perpen-
dicular pairs (16 in all). These were connected together, as shown in Fig. 2,
to compensate for temperature changes. A photograph of the apparatus
is shown in Fig. 3.
Horizontal
Horizontal
(o)
~ Steel ring
Horizontal
(b)
FIG. 2--Arrangement o f strain gages on ring chamber: (a) circuit diagram; (b) location o f
gages.
The chamber was calibrated, using air pressure applied from the inside
through a thin rubber membrane. The changes in the height of specimen
were measured using a linear variable differential transformer (LVDT).
Axial load was measured, using a copper-beryllium load cell that had
been calibrated with dead loads. The loads and height changes were read
out on a digital voltmeter and teleprinter. The setup is shown in Fig. 4.
Test Soil
The soil used in this investigation was a well-sorted beach sand known
as Monterey No. 0 (zero). It is a uniform, medium grain size sand (ds0 =
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
174 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
0.43 ram; C, = 1.4), composed mostly of quartz and some feldspar. The
grains are rounded and somewhat elongate (mean length/width ratio =
1.39), as shown in Fig. 5. The specific gravity of grains is 2.65, and the
maximum and minimum densities, determined in accordance with ASTM
Test for Relative Density of Cohesionless Soils (D 2049-69), are 1.70 and
1.45 g/cm 3, respectively [44].
Specimen Preparation
Specimens were prepared in the ring chamber either by pluviation (pour-
ing dry) or by vibration. Pouring from zero height was used for obtaining
loose specimens. Dense specimens were produced either by slow pouring
from a height or by vibratory compaction. Vibration was applied on top
of the sand layers by means of a circular plate of the same diameter as the
specimen vibrating vertically (frequency = 30 Hz, amplitude = approxi-
mately 0.5 ram).
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
MAHMOOD ET AL ON PREPARATION METHODS FOR SAND 175
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
176 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
FIG. 5--Grain shape distribution of Monterey No. 0 sand based on study of 227particles.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
MAHMOODETALONPREPARATIONMETHODSFORSAND 177
(o)
/
5~176
~ ~ (c)
FIG. 6--Grain orientation diagrams f o r specimens o f Monterey sand: (a) pluviated, density
= 1.58 g / c m 3 Dr = 53 percent; (b)pluviated, density = 1,72 g/cm 3, Dr = 106 percent; (c)
vibrated, density = 1.69 g/crn 3, DR = 97 percent; and (d) vibrated, density = 1.71 g / c m 3,
DR = 104 percent.
Testing Program
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
178 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
Fabric Results
Particle orientation diagrams, representing the initial or as-compacted
fabrics of four specimens, are presented in Fig. 6. When poured to form
a medium dense specimen, the sand particles acquired a grain orientation
as shown in Fig. 6a. There is no strong preferred orientation of grain axes.
Experiments with materials composed of elongate, angular grains had
shown that pouring resulted in the grains acquiring an arrangement such
that their long axes were preferentially oriented in the horizontal direc-
t i o n - o r normal to the direction of fall [1]. This orientation of grains can
be explained by considering the behavior of flat ellipsoids tumbling in free
fall [45]. On a horizontal surface, more ellipsoids are likely to come to
rest with their long axes normal to the direction of free fall.
In the case of a soil such as the Monterey sand, which is composed of
grains that are only slightly elongate and rounded, no strong orientation
resulted on pouring. Evidently, at the end of fall when the nearly equant,
rounded grains come to rest, they take up random positions. A very slow
rate of pouring was used to obtain dense specimens, and the randomness
of grains was still observed, as shown in Fig. 6b. Densification by vibration
also produced a specimen with reasonably random grains, which can be
seen in Fig. 6c. This grain arrangement resulting from dynamic densification
is similar to that of soils composed of elongate, angular particles [1].
Specimens were prepared by vibrating each layer for a longer period
of time than that required to attain 100 percent relative density, in order
to develop some prestress in the specimen. The grain orientation diagram
for one such overvibrated specimen is shown in Fig. 6d, where it may be
seen that there is a recognizable preferred grain orientation, with the
vector mean oriented at about 40 deg from the horizontal. It appears that,
if the sand is kept in a fluidized state for an extended period by over-
vibration, then the grains get some freedom of mov~nent and gradually
acquire a preferred orientation. That the grain axes become oriented at
40 deg could perhaps be due to the fact that densification to a high
density involves frictional slippage at grain contacts, and the particles
gradually become arranged to resist this change. This happens even
though the vibratory stresses causing densification are cyclic and thus
might not be expected to produce preferred orientation. The sustained
application of vibratory compactive effort results in an incipient frictional
failure. Such a failure in a mass should be evident at two complementary
planes, but two planes might not be seen if the failure is initiated on one
of them first. In Fig. 6d, all the grains are arranged as if in a stack,
an arrangement known to develop when discrete plates are vibrated to a
dense state. Figure 7 suggests how such an arrangement might develop
in a sand with less elongate particles.
In the ASTM Test for Relative Density of Cohesionless Soils, (D 2049-
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
M A H M O O D ET AL ON PREPARATION METHODS FOR SAND 179
"Stack" Arrangement
F
I I I I I
O Initiol $ievin 9
8O ~, Sieving after 90 seconds
vibration per layer
g
- 60
g
u
Monterey Sand No. 0
9~ 4C
O
._o
2O
J
AI, = 5 1 1 I I I I I
0.05 0J 0.5 LO 5
Groin Size, mm
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
180 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
C o m p r e s s i o n Test Results
Axial deformations and radial stresses measured on sand specimens in
the ring chamber are presented in this section. The effect of relative density
on axial strain is shown in Figs. 9 and 10.
AxioI Stress, ko,/cm z
I I0
Oj ' I I I = , , , ,
I
I Density DI~
0.006 - ~ A~....,~
" ~a,l
0 . 0 0 $ --
O.OlC
O.OIZ
Monterey S a n d
I I I L ' I , ,
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
MAHMOOD ET AL ON PREPARATION METHODS FOR SAND 181
Axiol Stress,kg~mz
I0
I I I I I I I i
Density DR
g/cm~ %
0.00 P
t~ i.64 80
0002 - %
._
o
. \
0.00,
0.006 MontereySand - ~
0.007 I I I I I i J i
On unloading, the same trend was present initially, but below an axial
stress of about 4 kg/cm 2, the radial stresses in the dense specimen became
higher than in the loose sand, as seen in Fig. 11. The dense specimen was
more rigid than the loose specimen, and hence the static loading resulted
in relatively larger locked-in stresses during loading. During unloading,
these locked-in lateral stresses resulted in higher K values in the dense
specimen. This behavior was observed even when specimens were loaded
only up to 1 kg/cm 2, as shown in Fig. 12. Similar trends showing a reversal
in the comparative magnitudes of radial stresses on unloading were mea-
sured in the specimens prepared by vibration in six layers, as shown in
Fig. 13, but the effect was not as pronounced.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
182 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
1.4 I I I I I
Density DR
| Q/cm 5 %
1.2 - t
, PluviotedJ"o 1.46 6
L~ 1.71 104
1.0 -
o
\\
-
, 0 . 8
0.6
_ Loodmg ' ~ ~
~'0.4
0 I I I I i
0 2 4 6 8 iO 12
Axiol Stress, kg/cm 2
slightly denser than the specimen vibrated in six layers, yet the pluviated
specimen showed greater deformation under the same load. The greater
compressibility of the pluviated specimen is largely due to the axial de-
formation that occurs at low axial stress (less than 1 kg/cm 2) as may be
seen from Fig. 15, where the data are replotted on a linear scale.
The grain orientation diagrams of the pluviated and vibrated specimens
were shown in Figs. 6b and c, respectively, indicating grain arrangements
that were quite random, yet their axial deformations showed small dif-
ferences. These small differences could have been due to a difference in
the initial state of stress of the poured and the vibrated specimens. If any
such difference existed, it was likely to show up in the initial value of
measured lateral stresses. A plot of K (ratio of radial stress to axial stress)
versus axial stress is shown in Fig. 16 for dense specimens prepared by
pluviation and by vibration. The pluviated specimen had slightly higher
lateral stresses. The vibrated specimen did not show any evidence of high
locked-in stresses.
It is intriguing that the vibrated specimen did not have the high lateral
stresses that might be expected [47], and the behavior could not be explained
on the basis of grain orientations. It may be that the vibrated specimen
was less compressible because the particles had acquired an arrangement
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized
MAHMOOD ET AL ON PREPARATION METHODS FOR SAND 183
0.9 I I i I I
a ~ Monterey Sond
0.8
\
xA
0.7 \
\
0.6
U')
0.5
K
<z
0 ' u _ ~
=
| 0.4 A
LoodinQ
nO-~ 0.3
Density DR
g/cm3 %
0.2
o ,.46 ~ } P,uviafed
/" 1.71 I
0.1
o I I I I I
O 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 I. 0 1.2
Axiol Stress, kQ/cml
F I G . 12--Relationship between axial stress and K in pluviated specimens in the low axial
stress range.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
184 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
1.4 I I l I I
Density DR
I,Z 9/~" ~ -
o 1.57 50 /
1.64 80 ~,Vibrated
1.69 97 J
E I.G o -
o
(:16
l,J~loodinQ
0.6
o
^ -"~-~.~-'2~ _
0.4
"~: - ~- --8:-~; --- ~- - - - -o . . . . -o
Loodinq
Monterey Sond
I I I I I
0 Z 4 6 8 I0 12
Axiol S t r e s s , kg/cm 2
mens, and shows that the overvibrated grain structure was relatively
more resilient.
The measured lateral stresses during loading of overvibrated specimens,
as shown in Fig. 19, increased with decreasing density, as would be ex-
pected. Evidently, however, density differences were too small to cause a
crossover of the curves on unloading, as was the case in Fig. 12. '
The compression test results shown in Figs. 10, 15, and 18 are replotted
in Fig. 20, expressing compressibility as the ratio of strain to stress
(1/modulus), obtained from the slopes o f stress-strain curves at axial
stress values of 1, 4, and 10 kg/cm'. This figure shows that, at low axial
stresses, the compressiblity is large and gradually decreases at high axial
stresses of 4 and 10 kg/cmL The plots also show that, at each axial stress
value, the compressibility is large at low relative densities, decreases with
increasing relative density to a point, and then increases again. This
optimum value of relative density, at which the lowest compressibility oc-
curs, is about 85 percent for 1 kg/cm 2, 95 percent for 4 kg/cm 2, and
approximately 100 percent for the 10 kg/cm 2 curve.
Long duration of vibration could cause enough particle breakage in
some sands to influence the compression behavior. However, no measura-
ble change in grain size took place here, as already shown in Fig. 8.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
MAHMOOD ET AL ON PREPARATION METHODS FOR SAND 185
Densit~E DR
O.OOI g/cm= %
A t.69 97 Vibrated
a 1.71 104 Ruvioted
0.00~
,a o.oo3
s
0.00,
0.005
0.006
Monterey Sond ~o,~
0007 I I I I l i i ,
FIG. 14--Effect of method of specimen preparation on the axial compression of dense sand.
Monterey Sond
o 0.004
(/1
o
K
-~~ ' ~ , , ~ ~
0.006
0.008 I I I I I
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
186 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
1.4 I I I I "1
M o n t e r e y Sand
Oensity D R
~l 4~ 1.69 97 Vibroted
~o o 1.71 104 Pluviofed
1.0
r
~ 0.4
Looding
O.Z
I I I I I
O 2 4 6 El 10 12
AJtiol Stress, k g / c m 2
Values o f K
The values of K, the ratio of radial stress to axial stress, are summarized
in Table 1. For comparison, a few measured values of the coefficient of
lateral pressure at rest reported in the literature are also included. The re-
sults from the various laboratory studies seem to be in the same general
range of values. The values measured in the field by D'Appolonia et al
[44] are substantially higher.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
MAHMOOD ET A L O N PREPARATION METHODS FOR S A N D 187
Density D R Vi brotion/Loyelr
g/cm5 % seconds
0.001 o 1.69 95 30
1.70 I01 60
o 17',> 105 90
.~,,,,,,,,~ ~ Loo d i ng
0O02
0.003
0004 ~
0O03
~"-,. ~,, ]
QO06
Monterey Sond
0.007 I I I I I J I I/
.~ 0.004
o3
o .L UnloOding --''.a . . . . "'~",=..~..~ "~.,,,.~
Monterey Sond
0,008 J I I i t
FIG. 18--Effect o f overvibration on the axial compression o f dense sand, axial stress
plotted to linear scale.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
188 SOILSPECIMENPREPARATIONFORLABORATORYTESTING
1.4 I I I I I
Density DR Vibration/Layer
-- I:~ g/01~3 % seconds
I.Z
',I o~- ;; ~ -
~ ~ t704 OI 60
~ o I.Tg 105 90
i i.O
0.8
-,,,,,
O.S
n-
m 0.4
Loadin9
0.2
Monterey Sond
0 I I I I I
0 Z 4 6 8 I0 12
Axiol Stress, kg/cm 2
FIG.
19--Effect o f overvibration on the relationship between axial stress and K in speci-
mens densified by vibration in six layers.
07
i i i I i i
p .o,o k g /
-I~ /
I
,.r
== .ooe Monterey
Vibroted
Sond
Specimens
=- ~, .006
=
.o
o
4 kg/cm;
~ .004
r
I0 k g / c m ~ ~" ~ -
.002 I I I I I I I
30 40 50 60 70 80 90 IO0 I10
Relative Density, D R, %
Unloading "1"
Method of
Initial DR, % ~, deg Loading OCR b = 2 4 8 10 Specimen P r e p a r a t i o n Remarks 0
0
Cl
6 32* 0.46 0.60 0.74 0.85 0.95 pluvialion results f r o m this paper
1.02 1.12 vibration m a x i m u m vertical stress I"11
50 38* 0.42 0.60 0.82 "--I
80 44 ~ 0.39 0.57 0.80 1.02 1.20 vibration o n specimen = 10 k g / c m 2
2~
97 47 ~ 0.35 0.53 0.78 1.02 1.20 vibration r o u n d e d sand grains I-"
104 49 ~ 0.40 0.58 0.85 1.12 1.30 pluviation
O
9 30 0.38 . . . . . . Hendrnn, rounded sands--from Z
... 34 0.33 . . . . . . B r o o k e r a n d Ireland [48] "0
"11
.,. 30 0.50 . . . . . . Hendron, angular sands--from rn
B r o o k e r a n d Ireland [48] "1o
... 36 0.40 . . . . . .
(n = 0.352)
CO
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
190 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
Conclusions
A medium sand, composed of rounded, slightly elongate grains, when
pluviated at both low and high densities, formed specimens with randomly
oriented grains. When specimens were densified by vibration in layers, the
grain orientation was random up to 100 percent relative density. When
vibration was continued beyond the time interval needed for achieving 100
percent relative density, the grains acquired a preferred orientation with a
vector mean at some inclination to the horizontal.
The loose, pluviated specimens were much more compressible than the
dense specimens prepared by the same procedure. On application of verti-
cal load, the particles slide and overturn to reduce the void volume. The
lateral stresses during loading were higher in the loose specimen; being
less rigid, it had a greater tendency for sideward bulge than the dense
specimens. On unloading also, the loose specimen had higher lateral stresses
than the dense specimen, but this trend reversed itself towards the end of
unloading. The same trend was also measured in the specimens prepared
by vibration.
The dense specimens, when prepared by vibration, were less compressi-
ble than the pluviated specimens. This difference in the behavior of speci-
mens prepared by these two methods of preparation cannot be conclusively
explained on the basis of either grain arrangement or locked-in stresses.
The effects of stress history may also contribute to the observed behavior.
The grains are randomly oriented in both pluviated and vibrated speci-
mens, and the measured lateral stresses are slightly higher in the more
compressible, pluviated specimen.
It is believed that this study addressed two important issues bearing on
the specimen preparation of cohesionless materials. First, how meaningful
is a comparison of test results obtained from research efforts in the
absence of fabric studies and, second, how much emphasis should be
placed on fabric when in situ properties of granular materials are estimated
by testing reconstituted specimens in the laboratory. The results of this
study reaffirm that density as well as the method of densification should
be specified in standardized testing procedures. Also, it points to the need
for further research in testing of sands in order to obtain better under-
standing of how the field behavior of sands can be estimated from tests
in the laboratory.
Acknowledgments
The experimental work reported was carried out at the University of
California, Berkeley, and the study was supported by The National
Aeronautics and Space Administration through Grant NGR-05-003-406
and Contract NAS 9-11266. Joyce Blueford and Carl Bellamy helped with
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
MAHMOOD ET AL ON PREPARATION METHODS FOR SAND 191
References
[1] Mahmood, A. and Mitchell, J. K., Clays and Clay Minerals, Vol. 22, No. 5/6, pp. 397-
408.
[2] Oda, M., Soils and Foundations, Vol. 12, No. 1, March 1972, pp. 17-35.
[3] Casagrande, A. in Contributions to Soil Mechanics 1925-1940, Boston Society of Civil
Engineers, Boston, Mass., 1940, pp. 72-106.
[4] Lambe, T. W., "The Structure of Inorganic Soil," Proceedings, American Society of
Civil Engineers, Separate No. 315, Oct. 1953.
[5] Collins, K. and McGown, A., Geotechnique, Vol. 24, No. 2, June 1974, pp. 223-254.
[6] Underwood, E. E., Quantitative Stereology, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., t970.
[7] Elias, H., Science, Vol. 174, No. 4013, 3 Dec. 1971, pp. 993-1000.
[8] Brewer, R., Fabric and Mineral Analysis of Soils, Wiley, New York, 1964.
[9] Mitchell, J. K., Proceedings, Highway Research Board, Vol. 35, 1956, pp. 693-713.
llOl Smart, P., "Electron Microscope Methods in Soil Micromorphology," 4th International
Working Meeting on Soil Micromorphology, Kingston, 1973.
[I1] Smart, P. in Proceedings, International Symposium on Soil Structure, Gothenburg,
1973, Swedish Geotechnical Society, Stockholm, pp. 69-76.
[12] Pusch, R., Engineering Geology, Vol. 3, 1966, pp. 433-443.
[13] Smart, P. in Proceedings, International Conference on Structure, Solid Mechanical
Engineering Design University of Southampton, 1964, pp. 21-1 to 21-7.
[14] McConnachie, I., Geotechnique, Vol. 24, No. 2, June 1974, pp. 207-222.
[15] Borowicka, H., Jr., Proceedings, Eighth International Conference on Soil Mechanics
Foundation Engineering, Vol. 1.1, Moscow, 1973, pp. 71-77.
[16] Andrawes, K. Z. and Butterfield, R., Geotechnique, Vol. 23, No. 4, Dec. 1973, pp.
571-576.
[17] Martin, R. T., Clays and Clay Minerals, Vol. 26, pp. 271-287.
[18] Moore, C. A., "Mineralogical and Pore Fluid Influences on Deformation Mechanisms
in Clay Soils," Ph.D thesis, University of California, Berkeley, Calif., 1968.
[19] Graham, J. W., "Significance of Magnetic Anisotropy in Appalachian Sedimentary
Rocks," Geophysicalmonograph 10, American Geophysical Union, 1966, pp. 627-648.
[20] Abrogast, J. L., Fay, C. H., and Kaufman, S., "Method and Apparatus for Determining
Directional Dielectric Anisotropy in Solids," U.S. Patent Office, Patent 2,963,642,
1960.
[21] Arulanandan, K. and Smith, S. S., Proceedings, American Society of Civil Engineers,
Vol. 99, No. SM12, Dec. 1973, pp. 1113-1133.
[22] Mitchell, J. K. and Aranandan, K., Proceedings, American Society of Civil Engineers,
Journal of Soil Mechanics Foundation Division, Vol. 94, No. SM2, March 1968, pp.
447-472.
[23] Nanz, R. H., "Exploration of Earth Formations Associated with Petroleum Deposits,"
U.S. Patent Office, Patent 2,963,641, 1960.
[24] Olsen, H. W. in Clays and Clay Minerals, Proceedings of the 9th National Conference,
1962, Pergamon Press, New York, pp. 131-161.
[25] Orr, W. R., "Method for Determining Directional Inductive Anisotropy of Materials
by Measuring Q Factor," U.S. Patent Office, Patent 3,151,292, 1964.
[26] Schmertmann, J. H., Proceedings, American Soceity of Civil Engineers, Vol. 96, No.
SM3, May 1970, pp. 1011-1046.
[27] Chaplin, T. K., Proceedings, 5th International Conference on Foundation Engineering,
Vol. 2, 1961, pp. 33--41.
[28] Selig, E. T. and Ladd, R. S. in Evaluation of Relative Density and Its Role in Geo-
technical Projects Involving Cohesionless Soils, ASTM STP 523, American Society for
Testing and Materials, 1973, pp. 487-504.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
192 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
[29] Janbu, N., "Soil Compressibility as Determined by Oedometer and Triaxial Tests,"
European Regional Conference on Soil Mechanics Foundation Engineering, Weisbaden,
1963, pp. 19-25.
[30] Duncan, J. M. and Chang, C. Y., Proceedings, American Society of Civil Engineers,
Vol. 96, No. SM5, Journal o f Soil Mechanics Foundation Division, Sept. 1970, pp.
1629-1953.
[31] D'Appolonia, D. J., D'Appolonia, E., and Brissette, R. F., Proceedings, American
Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 94, No. SM3, Journal of Soil Mechanics Foundation
Division, May 1968, pp. 735-759.
[32] Schmidt, B. and Steen, O., "Compression of Sands," Bulletin No. 23, The Danish
Geotechnical Institute, 1967.
[33] Hendron, A. J., "The Behavior of Sand in One-dimensional Compression," Ph.D
dissertation, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Illinois, Urbana, 1963.
[34] Obrcian, V., "Determination of Lateral Pressures Associated with Consolidation of
Granular Soils," Highway Research Record 284, Highway Research Board, 1969, pp.
13-24.
[35] Calhoun, D. E. and Triandafilidis, G. E., Proceedings, 7th International Conference on
Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Mexico City, 1969, Vol. 1, pp. 65-72.
[36] Bishop, A. W. and Henkel, D. J. Measurement of Soil Properties in the Triaxial Test,
Edward Arnold, London, 1962.
[37] Moore, C. A., Proceedings, American Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 97, No. SM9,
Journal of SoiI Mechanics Foundation Division, Sept. 1971, pp. 1275-1292.
[38] Campanella, R. G. and Vaid, Y. P., Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 9, Aug. 1972,
pp. 249-260.
[39] Andreasson, L., "Compressibility of Frictional Soils," Ph.D dissertation, Chalmers
University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden (in Swedish with English summary).
[40] Fumagalli, E., Proceedings, American Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 95, No. SM1,
Journal of Soil Mechanics Foundation Division, Jan. 1969, pp. 313-330.
[41] Lindblom, U., "Compression Characteristics of Spread Fills from Blast Rock, with
Special Reference to Settlements of Footings," Ph.D dissertation, Chalmers University
of Technology, 1972, Gothenburg, Sweden (in Swedish with English summary).
[42] Lade, P. V. and Duncan, J. M., Proceedings, American Society of Civil Engineers, Vol.
99, No. SM10, Oct. 1973, pp. 793-812.
[43] Daniel, A. W. T., Harvey, R. C., and Burley, E., Proceedings, American Society of
Civil Engineers, Vol. 101, No. GTS, Journal of Geotechnical Engineering Division,
May 1975, pp. 508-512.
[44] Durgunoglu, H. T., "Static Penetration Resistance of Soils," Ph.D dissertation,
University of California, Berkeley, 1972.
[45] Jizba, Z. V. in Procedures in Sedimentary Petrology, R. E. Carver, Ed., Wiley, New
York, 1971.
[46] Youd, T., Proceedings, American Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 98, No. SM7, Journal
o f Soil Mechanics Foundation Division, July 1972, pp. 709-726.
[47] D'Appolonia, D., Whitman, R., and D'Appolonia, E., Proceedings, American Society
of Civil Engineers, Vol. 95, No. SM1, Journal of Soil Mechanics Foundation Division,
Jan. 1969, pp. 263-284.
[48] Brooker, E. W. and Ireland, H. O., Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 2, No. 1,
Feb. 1965, pp. 1-15.
[49] Durgunoglu, H. T. and Mitchell, J. K., "Static Penetration Resistance of Soils,"
Geotechnical Engineering Report by Space Science Laboratory, University of California,
Berkeley, April 1973.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
V. A . N a c c i ~ a n d R. A . D ' A n d r e a 2
REFERENCE: Nacci, V. A. and D'Andrea, R. A., "A Technique for the Prepara-
tion of Specimens of Loose Layered Silts," Soil Specimen Preparationfor Laboratory
Testing, ASTM STP 599, American Society for Testing and Materials, 1976, pp.
193-201.
KEY WORDS: soils, silts, sedimentation, freezing, anisotropy, shear strength, triaxial
tests
Professor of civil and ocean engineering, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, R.I. 02881.
~Assistant professor of Civil Engineering, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester,
Mass. 01609.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
Copyright 9 1976by ASTM International www.astm.org
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
194 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
1.0, and, in many respects, they behave like loose sands, in that it is not
uncommon for them to lose a high percentage of their undrained strength
when the silt is subjected to limited remolding, which is inevitable in even
the best undisturbed sampling techniques.
A prime prerequisite to the aforementioned study was to obtain samples
which preserved the in situ layering, structure, and porosity variations.
However, conventional sampling techniques, including thin-walled and
block sampling, produced inferior results, since the soil liquefied at the
slightest disturbance. Furthermore, even when good samples were obtained,
some densification took place in transit to the laboratory, and it was
assumed that the resulting laboratory specimen would exhibit a higher
strength than that present in situ, due to its decreased void ratio.
A review of the relevant available literature reveals that the problem of
obtaining adequate samples of silty soils seems almost universal. Some
studies [1,2] 3 have employed remolded triaxial specimens of varying relative
densities, and the large excess pore water pressures developed upon shearing
the loose samples in these studies proved to be a good indicator of the
expected behavior of the silts in question. However, as demonstrated in
strength investigations on layered clays [3,4], it seemed likely that the shear
strength would be dependent upon the shear plane orientation with regard to the
strata, as well as soil structure and void ratio. Furthermore, Bjerrum [5] has
pointed up the importance of anisotropic strength effects and their relevance
to solutions of soil stability problems. Consequently, remolded samples
(which would exhibit no anisotropy) were deemed inappropriate for this
investigation.
Investigations by Fagnoul [6] and Schultze and Odendahl [7] indicate that
undisturbed silt samples were tested, but fail to indicate how these samples
were obtained.
Hirschfeld and Poulos [8] present drained shear test data from samples
extracted from an undisturbed block. Fortunately, their silt was not satu-
rated fully and had a high preconsolidation pressure. Both of these effects
(which are absent in the Rhode Island silts under study) impart some rigidity
to the soil, and thus probably facilitated sampling.
In situ field strength tests, such as the vane shear, provide questionable
results in silt, since drainage conditions are difficult to predict, due to the
silt's relatively high permeability. Tests are likely to be drained partially and
consequently would yield strengths greater than the undrained strength in
the loose silt under consideration. Although Blight [9] presents a technique
for performing drained field vane shear tests, undrained strength para-
meters for the Rhode Island silts were required for certain design purposes.
Thus, field strength testing programs were discarded in favor of laboratory
testing under monitored drainage conditions, and the decision was made
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
NACCI AND D'ANDREA ON LOOSE LAYERED SILTS 195
Soil Description
In many parts of the world which have experienced glaciation, there exist
clay, silt, and sand deposits with a definite banded or varved structure.
The Rhode Island silts are illustrative of such sedimentary glacial lakebed
deposits.
Although the mode of sedimentation and the effects of electrolytes on
deposition may be a matter of dispute, the typical Rhode Island silt is
banded, almost devoid of clay particles, and in a fairly loose condition.
Their characteristic light and dark bands imply an annual deposit, with
the coarser silt and sand sizes having been deposited during periods when
the waters of the parent glacial lake were more turbulent. The silts in the
Providence, Rhode Island area are fairly consistent in lamina thickness,
with natural water contents often well above the liquid limit. It is not un-
common for standard penetration test results to be two blows per foot or
less.
A typical deposit, which was sampled extensively for this investigation,
was discovered at a location 1.5 km south of the Park Avenue overpass
on Interstate Route 95 in Cranston, Rhode Island. The distinguishing
geotechnical features of this deposit may be summarized as follows:
1. The successive layers are on the order of 0.9 cm in thickness and are
composed mainly of a lightly colored coarser portion which grades into a
thick dark band composed of rock flour and clay. No attempt was made
to separate the materials comprising the layers, since the grading was often
almost imperceptible.
2. Natural water contents varied between 30 and 38 percent.
3. The liquid and plastic limits for the material, as a whole, were 28
and 22 percent, respectively.
4. The grain size range and uniformity (again, of the entire mass) are
depicted in Fig. 1.
5. The high natural water contents suggest a metastable soil structure,
and the soil, when sampled, proved highly sensitive to disturbance.
Specimen Preparation
Initially, bulk samples were procured from the site during the con-
struction of Interstate Route 95. The soil was stored in barrels, and, as it
was needed, it was mixed with sufficient distilled water to produce a mass
which could be readily poured through a funnel. The resultant slurry was
stored in sealed glass jars.
Triaxial specimens were prepared by slow sedimentation of this slurry
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
196 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
100.
-.....
a~
Z 40
~o
20 ,,I
.3 .2 .06 .02 .01 .002 .001
LOAD
POROUS STONE
VARVED SAMPLE
j BEAKER
PLASTIC TUBE~
....-.----COARSE SAND
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
NACCI AND D'ANDREA ON LOOSE LAYERED SILTS 197
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
198 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
NACCI A N D D'ANDREA ON LOOSE LAYERED SILTS 199
80
70 ~,
60 i
z so
~i 4o
0//
3O
10
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
STRaiN C%')
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
200 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
80
/
E
Z
60
/
i 40
20
0
o 2o 4o 6o 80 loo 12o
granular material: granular, in that the silt's void ratio and stress history
solely govern its strength, and slow draining, in that significant time is
required to dissipate excess pore pressures developed upon application of
shear stresses. Although a complete discussion of application of the
parameters derived from the laboratory sedimented specimens to field
cases is beyond the scope of this paper, use of results from laboratory
specimens whose water contents equaled those of the in situ silt proved to
yield successful solutions (in that no failures were observed) to problems
concerning stability, structural foundations, and slopes of cuts, as well
as reasonable predictions for settlement under preloads.
Conclusions
Due to the highly unstable nature of many sedimentary silt deposits,
even ratively undisturbed samples are difficult to obtain. As a result,
most investigations of such silty sites make use of remolded products or
use natural specimens, on which the effects of sampling and handling
disturbance cannot be quantified.
According to this study, silt samples may be sedimented artificially in
the laboratory and frozen to provide sufficient rigidity to prelude
densification during handling and test setup. The resultant specimens
have the same ~soil solid constituents and similar water content and
layering characteristics as the original in situ deposits.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
NACCI AND D'ANDREA ON LOOSE LAYERED SILTS 201
Acknowledgments
This study forms part of an investigation of the strength characteristics
of saturated varved silts being conducted under the sponsorship of the
Rhode Island Department of Public Works, in cooperation with the U.S.
Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration, Bureau
of Public Roads. The opinions, findings, and conclusions are those of the
authors and not necessarily those of the Bureau of Public Roads.
References
[1] Penman, A. D. M., Geotechnique, Vol. III, No. 8, Dec. 1953, pp. 312-238.
[2] Schultze, E. and Norn, A. in Proceedings, Sixth International Conference on Soil
Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Vol. I, Montreal, 1965, pp. 350-353.
[3] Lo, K. Y. and Milligan, V., Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundation Division,
American Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 93, No. SM1, Paper 5056, Jan. 1967,
pp. 1-15.
[4] Milligan, V., Soderman, L. and Rutka, A., Journal of the Soil Mechanics and
Foundation Division, American Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 88, No. SM4, Paper
3324, Aug. 1962, pp. 31-67.
[5] Bjerrum, L. in Proceedings, Eighth International Conference on Soil Mechanics and
Foundation Engineering, Vol. 3, Moscow, 1973, pp. 111-159.
[6] Fagnoul, A. in Proceedings, Sixth International Conference on Soil Mechanics and
Foundation Engineering, Vol. 1, Montreal, 1965, pp. 213-216.
[7] Schultze, E. and Odendaltl, R. in Proceedings of the Geotechnical Conference, Vol. I,
Oslo, 1967, pp. 239-242.
[8] Hirschfeld, R. C. and Poulos, S. J. in Laboratory Shear Testing of Soils, ASTM STP
351, American Society for Testing and Materials, pp. 329-341.
[9] Blight, G. E., Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 5, No. 3, Aug. 1968, pp. 142-149.
[10] Doyle, E. H., "Influence of Strata Orientation on the Shear Strength of Varved Silt,"
unpublished M.S. thesis, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, R.I., 1968.
[11] Lambe, T. W., Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundation Division, American
Society for Civil Engineers, Vol. 84, No. SM2, Paper 1654, May 1958, pp. 1-34.
[12] Fahlquist, F. E. in SoilMechanics 1941-1953, Boston Society of Civil Engineers, Boston,
1953, pp. 20-44.
[13] Lowe, J., III, and Johnson, T. C. in Proceedings, American Society of Civil Engineers
Research Conference on Shear Strength of Cohesive Soils, Boulder, Color., 1960,
pp. 819-836.
[14] Andersen, A. and Simons, N. in Proceedings, American Society of Civil Engineers
Research Conference on Shear Strength of Cohesive Soils, Boulder, Colo., 1960,
pp. 695-709.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
T. F. Z i m m i e ' a n d L. J. A l m a l e h ~
ABSTRACT: Various methods of removing moisture from small soil samples were
investigated. The samples were to be tested by mercury porosimetry, and one
requirement is a constant volume drying process. Air-drying, oven-drying and freeze-
drying procedures were used. Three different clay types were used: kaolinite,
montmorillonite, and an illite. The clays were fully saturated, and compaction was
achieved by using static pressure.
Freeze drying is the best practical method of drying the soil samples, as it produces
the least amount of shrinkage in the soil. In certain instances, air drying and oven
drying may produce satisfactory results. Total drying time for freeze drying can
be accomplished in 5 to 10 h.
A simple laboratory freeze-drying system is described and operating procedures
and principles discussed.
The results are applicable to the preparation of small size soil samples where it is
desired to remove soil moisture and, at the same time, minimize disturbance to the
soil structure.
KEY WORDS: soils, samples, clays, shrinkage, drying, freezing, moisture content,
vacuum, mercury porosimetry, tests
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
Copyright9 1976by ASTM International www.astm.org
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
ZIMMIE AND ALMALEH ON POROSIMETRY TEST SPECIMENS 203
2The italic numbers in brackets to refer to the list of references appended to this paper.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
204 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
Equipment
General Considerations
The basic elements required for a vacuum freeze-drying system consist
of a specimen container to hold the sample, a condenser or cold trap to
condense the moisture removed from the sample, and a vacuum pump.
A vacuum gage in the system can be considered a convenient addition
in order to monitor the operation. The freeze-drying apparatus used in
this project is shown in Fig. 1, and the basic dements just mentioned
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
ZIMMIE AND ALMALEH ON POROSIMETRY TEST SPECIMENS 205
The commercial units are designed normally for handling large volumes
of sample on the order of litres, and, as a result, both initial and operating
costs o f a commercial unit will be higher than the costs for a simple
laboratory system. To the best o f the authors' knowledge, there is no
commercial freeze-drying apparatus available that is specifically tailored
to soils work, and, in most instances, a system similar to the one used
in this project will be satisfactory for freeze drying small volumes o f
soil. Relative to performance, the final freeze-dried product will be
identical whether a commercial unit or apparatus similar to that shown
in Fig. 1 is used, as long as the system characteristics are comparable.
That is, if comparable samples, vacuums, temperatures, refrigerants, and
times are used, the results will be comparable.
Apparatus
The specimen container consisted of a 250-ml glass jar, able to withstand
a vacuum (Fig. 2). In order to minimize handling, the soil samples were
placed on a cage, immersed in liquid nitrogen until frozen, and then
placed in the jar along with the cage. The cage consisted of stainless steel
wire and aluminum screen, since the metals must be resistant to cryo-
genic temperatures. Normally, three soil samples were dried at a time.
However, the volume of the jar and the capacity of the system are
sufficient to produce 10 or 20 samples at a time.
After soil samples are frozen, the freeze-drying process must begin
rapidly so that melting does not occur. The 250-ml jar could be evacuated
in a matter o f seconds, and there was no danger of the samples melting.
A larger volume jar might necessitate a larger vacuum pump or a vacuum
ballast or both in order to produce a vacuum quickly. The system should
be evacuated in about 15 s to be certain that no sample melting occurs.
The vacuum gage utilized was a diaphragm type gage, accurate to about
2 nun Hg. This type o f gage is not precise enough to read the actual
vacuum in the system. Where precise vacuum readings are desired, special
purpose vacuum gages must be used [6]. However, the diaphram gage in
the system can be calibrated against a precision vacuum gage to establish
a zero point, that is, the operating pressure of the system. Then loss o f
vacuum caused by slight leaks or similar problems can be detected easily.
This was the purpose of the gage shown in Fig. 1.
The condenser consisted of a Dewar flask, suitable for cryogenic
liquids, which held the refrigerant, and a commercial vacuum pump
protector. The vacuum pump protector consisted of two compartments,
the first, a condenser compartment which is immersed in the refrigerant
to freeze out the sample moisture, and, the second, a compartment filled
with a chemical dessicating agent to prevent water vapor from entering
the vacuum pump. In order to maintain a proper vacuum, the dessicant
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
206 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
ZIMMIE AND ALMALEH ON POROSIMETRY TEST SPECIMENS 207
soil samples. The dial gage can be read to 0.002 ram. The gage force is
only about 50 g, and this force can be reduced by applying a slight
squeezing force to the top extension o f the gage arm as the gage arm is
brought into contact with the sample. As a result, even the softest soil
could be measured without disturbance. The performance o f the volume
measuring device was quite satisfactory, and the measurements were con-
sistently reproducible. George [7], in his shrinkage studies on soil-cement
mixtures, obtained satisfactory results using a dial gage measuring device
similar in concept to the one used for this project. A precision micrometer
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
208 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
Specimens
Most of the tests were performed on two clays, a kaolinite and a sodium
montmorillonite. These clays were selected because they have very differ-
ent properties. In fact, they represent opposite ends of the spectrum
normally encountered. One series of tests were performed using a local
illitic clay o f glacial origin in order to ascertain that results that were
similar to those for the kaolinite and montmorillonite samples could be
obtained. The properties o f the clays are presented in Table 1, and the
hydrometer grain size analysis for the kaolinite is shown in Fig. 4.
Sodium
Property Kaolinite Montmorillonite Illitic Clay
The Georgia Kaolin In situ sample
Co., Dry AmericanColloid eastern New
Supplier Branch, Ga. Co., Chicago, Ill. York State
WL, o70 39 "~500 43
We, % 26 85 29
Specific gravity 2.65 2.70 2.80
Percent finer than #200 sieve 98 95 99.6
Percent finer than 20 t~m 96 90 98
Percent finer than 0.5 lam 67 85 80
Specimen Preparation
The clay samples were remolded with sufficient water to assure com-
plete saturation. The clays were compacted by using a static procedure.
Different pressures were utilized to produce various water contents. The
clays were placed in a standard Proctor mold (volume approximately 1000
cm3), and static pressure was applied by jacking. The compaction was
carried out in stages until the final pressure was reached. The final static
pressure w a s a b o u t 700 k N / m 2 for the highest water contents and about
2800 k N / m 2 for the lowest water contents. Consistent procedures were
used in the mixing and compaction processes, and, for each clay type, the
final water contents and void ratios could be satisfactorily duplicated to
within a few percent. After compaction, the load was removed f r o m the
soil, and the soil was allowed to rebound and come to equilibrium. The
length o f the compaction period ranged f r o m one to three days.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
ZIMMIE AND ALMELEH ON POROSIMETRY TEST SPECIMENS 209
I00
~ II I I [ i i]1 [ i E i ~ tl}l
I
i i i i t
90
BO
70
60
I-- 5 O
~40
~ 3o
~ 2O
IAI
z_
u. I 0
Samples for testing were taken from the center of the soil mass, where
they were of uniform water content and void ratio. The outer portions
of the soil mass tended to be more nonuniform than the center. Cube
samples about 7 mm on a side were formed by trimming with a thin wire
cutter.
Procedure
The oven-dried samples were dried at l l0~ and the air-dried samples
at room temperature (20 ~
The samples to be freeze dried were placed on a cage (Fig. 2) and
immersed directly into liquid nitrogen, where they froze in about 5 to 15 s.
It is important that the samples be frozen rapidly and at temperatures
below - 130~ to avoid the formation of ice crystals which can damage
the soil structure [2]. To attain the low temperatures, liquefied gases must
be used, usually liquid nitrogen. When a sample is placed in a liquefied
gas, bubbling occurs from the heat transfer, and the sample becomes
surrounded by a thermally insulating layer of gas which tends to retard
the freezing process. In order to avoid this relative delay in freezing, the
samples can be immersed directly into intermediate cooling liquids, for
example iso-pentane cooled by liquid nitrogen [6]. For the small size
samples used for mercury porosimetry tests, this refinement is not required,
as freezing occurs rapidly. However, if large soil samples are to be frozen
for other applications, the use of intermediate cooling liquids may be
required.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
210 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
ZIMMIE AND ALMALEH ON POROSIMETRY TEST SPECIMENS 211
Experimental W o r k
R a t e o f Freeze Drying
o 50 i KAOLINITE
t-
g_
~ 2o
~ ,o
0 [ I I I L ~ I
0 I 2 5 4 5 6 7
FREEZE DRYING TIME I HRS.)
FIG. 6---Typicalrate of freeze-drying curve showing soil water content versus time.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
212 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
G = 3600yV(M/2nRT)P (1)
where
G = rate of evaporation in grams per square cm of surface per hour,
y = evaporation coefficient,
M = molecular weight,
R -- gas constant in dyne cm per mole per ~
P = vapor pressure of pure ice at the temperature of evaporation, and
T = temperature in K.
Assuming y to be unity and expressing P in mm of mercury Eq 1 reduces
to
G = 544(PA/--T) (2)
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
ZIMMIE AND ALMALEH ON POROSIMETRY TEST SPECIMENS 213
The shrinkage values obtained were slightly less when the specimen jar
was immersed in a refrigerant; however, no special significance should be
attached to the slight differences in shrinkage values.
There appears to be no advantage to immersing the specimen jar in a
refrigerant. On the other hand, the drying time is extended considerably.
As pointed up previously, there is little danger of small soil samples melt-
ing if the specimen container is exposed to room temperature.
Results
The results of drying tests on approximately 100 soil samples (cubes
7 mm on a side) are presented in Fig. 7. Each data point represents the
AIR DRIED 9
OVEN DRIED 9
FREEZE DRIED 9
T
2s
I
z 15
.I-
u
f SAMPLES DISINTEGRATED.
IO
0
I1~'
I
IO
I
20 30
I
9
40
I
9
I
50
I
60
I
I00
I
9
150
I I I
200
I
250
I I I
300
WATER CONTENT: % DRY WEIGHT OF SOIL
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
214 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
A series of the illitic clay samples were freeze dried for comparative
purposes. The water contents were 38 percent, and the mean final shrinkage
value was about 5 percent, a value similar to that obtained for kaolinite.
The shrinkage values for the clays can be considered to represent the
absolute volume change due to drying procedures. Volume measurements
were made on a number of samples after freezing in liquid nitrogen, and
the amount of expansion measured was negligible. Rosenqvist [3] has
reported a value as high as 3 percent expansion when an undisturbed soft
Norwegian marine clay was frozen, and this is probably the highest value
that Would be normally encountered.
For freeze-dried samples, a final water content of 0.5 percent or less
was considered a dry sample. Freeze-dried samples absorb moisture
rapidly; rates of 2 percent water content per minute have been reported [6].
Thus, the sample absorbs moisture even during the weighing process.
Practically speaking, there is no necessity for removing the last 0.5 percent
moisture, since the sample will be exposed to the atmosphere while being
transferred to the mercury porosimeter chamber.
Conclusions
Vacuum freeze drying is the best practical method of preparation of soil
samples for mercury porosimetry tests. Adequate drying can be accom-
plished in 5 to 10 h.
In certain instances, air drying and oven drying may produce satisfactory
samples for use in mercury porosimeter tests.
This research was primarily intended to study soil sample drying
methods for porosimetry testing. However, the results and methods are
applicable to other areas where it is necessary to produce dry soil samples
with minimal structural disturbance.
Acknowledgments
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
ZIMMIE AND ALMALEH ON POROSlMETRY TEST SPECIMENS 215
References
[1] Sridharan, Asuri, Altschaeffl, A. G., and Diamond, Sidney, Journal of the Soil
Mechanics and Foundations Division, American Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 97,
No. SM5, May 1971, pp. 771-787.
[2] Gillott, J. E., Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, Vol. 39, 1969, pp. 90-105.
[3] Rosenqvist, I. T., Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, American
Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 85, No. SM2, April 1959, pp. 31-53.
[4] Ahmed, Syed, Lovell, C. W. Jr., and Diamond, Sidney, Journal of the Geotechnical
Engineering Division, American Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 100, No. GT4, April
1974, pp. 407-425.
[5] Meryman, H. T., New York Academy of Science Annals, Vol. 85, March-May 1960,
pp. 630-640.
[6] Rowe, T. W. G., New York Academy o f Science Annals, Vol. 85, March-May, 1960,
pp. 641-679.
[7] George, K. P., Highway Research Record, No. 255, 1968, pp. 42-58.
[8] Broughton, Geoffrey in Technique of Organic Chemistry, Vol. III, 2nd Ed., Arnold
Weissberger, Ed., Interscience Publishers, New York, 1956, Chapter VI, pp. 787-839.
[9] Kearsey, H. S., Strickland-Constable, R. F., and Bruce, E. W. in The Institute of
Refrigeration, Imperial College of Science and Technology, Session 1953-1954,
pp. 5-15.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
A. R. Booth'
ABSTRACT: The paper describes the development of a method for the compaction of
groups of identical pedometer specimens. Groups were compacted from several soils at
various densities and moisture contents. The specimens in each group were tested later
in the pedometer over the complete range of initial saturations, and it was important
that they should be as near as possible to identical after compaction.
The paper considers, by means of a literature review, the various methods of compaction
available. The conclusion reached is that the static method is most suitable for compaction
of relatively thin specimens. Soil was compacted directly into the pedometer rings under
static loading. The advantages and disadvantages of this approach are discussed.
A special mold developed for this purpose is described in detail. This enabled a
known mass of soil to be compacted into a 76.2 by 19.05-mm-thick specimen. The
procedure used in the laboratory is outlined.
It was necessary to allow most specimens to either increase or decrease in moisture
content after compaction so that pedometer tests could be carried out over the complete
range of saturation. The procedures followed are described, and it is stressed that these
model as closely as possible what would happen in a road embankment.
Finally, the paper considers the dry densities of groups of specimens immediately
prior to being placed in the pedometer. It is shown that variations within each group
are lower than those found in undisturbed samples, and it is concluded that the
standardized method produced groups of specimens which were closer to identical than
would have been obtained by other methods. This, in turn, enabled the influence of
other variables, principally the compaction moisture content and initial dry density, to
be studied with more confidence.
T h e r e h a v e b e e n several failures o f r o a d e m b a n k m e n t s in s o u t h e r n A f r i c a
in r e c e n t y e a r s w h i c h c a n b e a t t r i b u t e d t o c o l l a p s e s e t t l e m e n t w i t h i n t h e c o m -
p a c t e d f i l l i n g , f o l l o w i n g w e t t i n g [1]. 2A r e s e a r c h p r o j e c t w a s i n i t i a t e d t o d e t e r -
mFormerly, chief research officer, National Institute for Road Research, Pretoria, South
Africa; presently, senior engineer, Duff and Geddes, Edinburgh, Scotland.
The italic numbers in brackets refer to the list of referencesappended to this paper.
216
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by ASTM International www.astm.org
Copyright + 1976by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
BOOTH ON SOIL SPECIMENS FOR OEDOMETER TESTING 217
mine how variations in the conditions imposed during construction affect the
subsequent settlement of the filling, particularly following wetting. The results
of this investigation are being reported elsewhere [1,2].
The experimental work was carried out in the laboratory, using standard
76.2 by 19.05-mm oedometer specimens. These were loaded, partly saturated,
and soaked, at a particular pressure, in the same way as the partly saturated
half of the double oedometer test [3,4]. Several soils were tested, and variations
were made in the initial dry density, the compaction moisture content, and the
maximum applied pressure. For each combination of imposed conditions, a
group (usually between 6 and 24 in number) of specimens was tested over the
full range of saturation, including one or two under water to represent full
saturation.
Since this work related to road embankments, the oedometer tests were carried
out on compacted soils. In order to make valid comparisons between the results,
it was essential to devise a method of preparation that produced a group of
specimens that were as close to identical as possible after compaction. Most
specimens were loaded at a moisture content other than that used for compac-
tion, and a conditioning procedure was necessary to allow increases or reduc-
tions in moisture content in a way that modelled, as closely as possible, such
changes in the field.
This paper describes the methods that were adopted for the compaction and
conditioning of the oedometer specimens. It also considers the uniformity of
specimens and groups of specimens in the light of the results obtained.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
218 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
gamma rays, and could thus measure densities every 0.4 in. (10.2 mm) along
the axis of 4-in. (101.6-mm) diameter specimens compacted statically. He
found significant variations in the density, which increased considerably
when the height to diameter ratio rose above unity.
Gau and Olson [10] compared dynamic, static, and kneading compaction
by means of a miniature penetrometer and concluded that the static method
gave the most uniform specimens, though kneading may be more representative
of field conditions. They agreed with Leonards [5] that greatest uni-
formity is achieved by static compaction in one thin layer.
The general conclusion reached is that static compaction gives the most
uniform specimens, and it as decided therefore to use this to prepare the
oedometer specimens. It is recognized nevertheless, that there may be differences
in the fabric and engineering properties of specimens compacted by other
methods [11].
Construction of Mold
The soils used for the oedometer tests were essentially sandy with a
relatively small proportion of finer particles (Fig. 1). When cutting oedo-
meter specimens from blocks of these soils, it was found that a good deal
of lack of fit occurred at the edges. It was decided therefore to compact
the soil directly into the oedometer ring and accept any slight variation in
density due to side friction. There is also the risk of built-in stresses within
the soil and, more particularly, between the soil and the ring, but silicone
grease was used in an attempt to reduce these.
The mold used for compaction of the specimens is shown schematically in
Fig. 2. It consists of a cylinder of 76.2 mm internal diameter, into which a
standard oedometer ring fits so that the inside faces are flush. Pistons can be
inserted at each end of the mold and are provided with flanges to prevent
them entering the oedometer ring. The mold splits on both vertical and hor-
izontal planes to facilitate the removal of the ring. The vertical joint is neces-
sary because otherwise even slight distortion of the ring during compaction
could lock it in the mold. The horizontal joint is arranged so that the ring is
still supported when the top half of the mold is removed, thus preventing
the ring sliding off the specimen. Figure 3 shows the mold with one side re-
moved to demonstrate the position of the ring.
No drains were provided in this mold since all specimens were compacted
well below the saturation moisture content. Air escapes between the piston
and the mold, provided the former is not inserted too rapidly.
Both the mold and the pistons were made of brass, chosen because of its
low cost and ease of machining during the development period. A large num-
ber of identical oedometer rings were also made from brass. The brass has
not been marked badly by the soil during compaction, but a harder surface
would be advisable if high densities were being used.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
BOOTH ON SOIL SPECIMENS FOR OEDOMETER TESTING 219
8O I SOIL Z - - ~
//
.of
x
7o
60 I /
//
z
u_
50
I j,1
/
/ /
~S'OIL Y
i!
I~ 1/ 7 6
z 30
zo
Method of Compaction
The mold was simple to use, and a group o f six specimens took about
2 h to make. The same sequence was used throughout.
The soil was stored dry, having first been wet sieved through a 2 mm
screen. Rather more dry soil than was actually necessary for the number o f
specimens being made was weighed in a bowl o f known weight to an accu-
racy of 0.1 g. Water was added to give the required moisture content and
worked in by hand until the operator was satisfied that it was distributed
evenly. This was not difficult with the types of soil being used. The wet soil
was reweighed to determine the exact moisture content and stored in an
air-tight bag while the amount required for each specimen was calculated.
The assembled mold was placed on the bench with the oedometer ring and
bottom piston in place, the inside faces having been greased sparingly. The
necessary amount o f soil, weighed to an accuracy of 0.01 g, was put into the
mold as shown in Fig. 4. This was probably the step at which the greatest lack
of uniformity occurred, and considerable care was essential to ensure an even
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
220 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
1--,o..o.o-1
2 - ~ i i ' MOLD
_L~ \OEOOMETER
IN PLACE
R,NG
i .~,..~../BOTTOM PtSTON
I I
MOLD SPLITS
ON THIS LINE
PLAN ON MOLD
All dimensions in mm
distribution of soil. The top piston was inserted and pressed home to compact
the soil into the ring, as in Fig. 5. At higher densities, it was helpful to maintain
the compacting pressure for some time to reduce rebound, and probably
this would be essential if less permeable clayey soils were being compacted.
Removal of the ring and specimen from the mold was relatively easy. The
top piston and top part of the mold were removed (as shown in Fig. 6) and a
porous disk placed over the end of the ring. The whole assembly was inverted,
so that the disk supported both the ring and specimen. The other piston and
the rest of the mold were removed, leaving the specimen in its ring standing on
the porous disk. (Each piston was given a slight twist before being pulled away
from the soil to release fine particles adhering to the face.)
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
BOOTH ON SOIL SPECIMENS FOR OEDOMETER TESTING 221
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
222 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
The behavior of the specimens in the humidity room differed from soil to
soil. In some soils, there was a slow increase in moisture content, suggesting
that it was rising simply by condensation on the exposed surface. Other soils
gained moisture rapidly and, if left in the humidity room, swelled quite con-
siderably within 89 h. The top surface always took a domed shape, presuma-
bly because swelling radially was giving rise to frictional stresses between the
soil and the ring. Specimens which swelled in this way were rejected without
being tested.
The drying part of the process took place in the air-conditioned laboratory.
The specimen, on a porous disk, was allowed to stand in the open and dry
slowly. The process was easy to control by weighing the specimen, including
ring and porous disk, until the mass fell to that required. Possible shrinkage
during drying was checked in many cases by measuring the thickness before
and after the drying stage, but differences were never found in excess of
0.5 percent and were usually much less.
When the required saturation had been reached, the specimen, still on its
disk, was placed in a double polythene bag and stored in the humidity room.
Where possible, this storage extended for at least four days to allow time for
the moisture to distribute more equally within the specimen.
Adjusting the moisture content means following different stress paths,
which may affect the test results to some extent [13]. There is, however, no
other way of bringing the specimens to different initial conditions, and the
methods do, in fact, model changes of moisture content in the field. These are
likely to occur most readily shortly after compaction, before the addition of
more filling.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
BOOTH ON SOIL SPECIMENS FOR OEDOMETER TESTING 223
Comparison of Specimens
The success of the method of compaction and conditioning can be con-
sidered in terms of the dry densities of groups of specimens, The actual dry
density of each specimen immediately prior to testing was calculated, based
on the thickness measured at the time and the mass of the dry soil at the end of
the test. The mean dry density of each group was then determined, though this
differed from that intended by up to 3 percent in extreme cases. As a general-
ization, the mean dry density achieved exceeded that intended when this was
relatively low but, at higher densities, the reverse applied. Increases in the
compaction moisture content gave only marginally higher dry densities.
Specimens were assumed to be sufficiently close to identical if the dry den-
sity was within 1 percent of the mean for that group. A total of 506 specimens
were made and conditioned, as described in this paper (a number of others
were subjected to a cyclic conditioning procedure [1]). These were divided
into 37 groups of between 5 and 72 specimens, though only 6 groups had more
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
224 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
FIG. 6--Mold partly dismantled showing soil compacted into oedometer ring.
than 12. Of these specimens, only 39 fell outside the 1 percent limits. Only 5
groups had more than 15 percent unsatisfactory specimens, and more than
half the groups had none at all [1].
Specimens were also prepared from undisturbed samples taken in the field,
both of natural residual soils and of embankment filling. Sixty-six specimens
were cut from two natural soils and three embankment fills, of which 37 fell
outside the I percent limits. The uniformity within individual specimens can-
not be quantified, but, in purely subjective terms, the laboratory compacted
specimens appeared to be much more homogeneous than those obtained
from the field.
Effect on Results
The test results are not discussed in any detail here, as this has been done
elsewhere [1,2]. Sufficient data will, however, be presented to demonstrate
that the results obtained were adequate for the study being carried out.
The basic analysis was considered in terms of the collapse occurring on
wetting as a function of the moisture content during loading, and it was found
that curves could be plotted. Figure 7 shows such a plot for specimens cut
from a naturally occurring collapsing sand from Durban. The scatter of
points is considerable, though not such as to make the drawing of a curve
impossible. Figures 8 and 9 are typical examples of the plots for groups of speci-
mens compacted in the mold. Figure 8 shows a case where the scatter of points
is at its worst, whereas Fig. 9 is one of the better plots obtained. In neither case
does the scatter of results cause any problems in interpretation.
It might be thought that the scatter of results in Fig. 8 was due to variations
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
BOOTH ON SOIL SPECIMENS FOR OEDOMETER TESTING 225
0"14 --
% •
0"12 --
~< 0'~0- -
13-
==
~ •
~J 0 ' 0 8 - X
c~
~0
0"06-
"04-
X
~KK
_Z X•
~ 0"02 --
~ •
I I x-x~-x-x-• I • I x-x-x-I
5 10 15 20 25 30
FIG. 7-- Typical results obtained from specimens cutfrom undisturbed sample of residual soil.
in density. In fact, none of the 24 specimens in this group fell outside the 1 per-
cent limits. In Fig. 10, the initial dry density has been plotted against moisture
content, with the collapse marked against each point. There is no pattern to
relate particularly the variations in collapse to those in dry density.
It was, nevertheless, found [1,2] that the initial dry density was a major
factor in determining the amount of collapse on wetting. The range of dry
densities existing in any group of specimens, however, does seem to have been
small enough to have prevented excessive variations in the test results.
Such variations as did occur can be probably ascribed to local fluctuations
in density or particle size within the specimen. These fluctuations would have
been caused during the filling of the mold, immediately prior to compaction.
It is doubtful whether any method of compaction can avoid this, since all
require some kind of mold to be filled. Variations in moisture content within
the specimen may have also contributed.
Conclusions
The paper has described a method for compacting and conditioning speci-
mens prior to testing, partly saturated, in the oedometer. The static method of
C opyri ght by ASTM Int ' l ( a l l r i g h t s r e s e r v e d ) ; W e d De c 2 2 1 4 : 0 0 : 0 0 E S T 2 0 1 0
D ownloaded/printed by
U ni vers ity of Britis h Co l u m b i a Li b r a r y p u r s u a n t t o Li c e n se A g r eem en t . N o f u r t h er r ep r o d u ct i o n s au
226 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
O-16 - -
0.14 x
•x
X ~
RECOMPACTED DECOMPOSED GRANITE FILLING
FROM NORTH-EASTERN TRANSVAAL
u~
0- 0-I0 _ x ,XXxx
0.08
D
0
I--
0.06 - - X
z ~o4
~ 0"02
Ilg
1 1 ~--x-x-xl ~ I ~ l
5 10 15 20 25 30
MOISTURE CONTENT DURING LOADING (%)
compaction has been shown, in the past, to give the most uniform specimens.
The conditioning procedure for adjusting the moisture content models, as
closely as practicable, the changes occurring in compacted earthworks.
Measurements of the dry density of the individual specimens immediately
prior to testing have been used to consider the uniformity of each group of
specimens. The variations within a group of laboratory compacted specimens
is considerably less than in those cut from natural or compacted soils in the
field. The homogeneity of individual specimens is also, by visual observation,
markedly better than in the in situ soils.
The results obtained from testing these specimens are adequate to enable con-
clusions to be drawn. Such variations as there were in the collapse settlements
measured cannot be related to the initial dry densities of the specimens. They
are probably caused by unavoidable local variation in dry density or particle
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
0'14
z 0-04 o=
g 0
o ~ 5 5 0 i_
m
I-
8
0,02
m
-,L
m
154C I I I I I I
0 5 I0 15 20 25 50
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
228 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
Acknowledgments
The work described in this paper was carried out at the National Institute
for Road Research in Pretoria, South Africa and is published by permission
of the director. The author would also like to thank Professor K. Knight of the
University of Natal in Durban, South Africa, for his interest throughout this
work.
References
[1] Booth, A. R., "Collapse Settlement in Compacted Soils," Council for Scientific and Indus-
trial Research, Research Report 324, National Institute for Road Research, Bulletin 13,
Pretoria, South Africa, to be published 1976.
[2] Booth, A. R. in Proceedings, 6th Regional Conference for Africa on Soil Mechanics and
Foundation Engineering, Durban, 1975, Vol. I, pp. 57-63.
[3] Jennings, J. E. B. and Knight, K. in Proceedings, 4th International Conference on Soil
Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, London, 1957, Vol. I, pp. 316-319.
[4] Knight, K., "The Collapse of Structure of Sandy Subsoils on Wetting," Ph.D. thesis,
University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa, 1961.
[5] Leonards, G. A. "Strength Characteristics of Compacted Clays," Proceedings, American
Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 79, Paper 360, 1953.
[6] Mayo, R. I. "Compression Tests on Stabilized Soil Mixtures," M.Sc. thesis, Purdue
University, Lafayette, Ind., 1939.
[7] Dawson, R. F. in Papers on 1959 Meetings Soils, ASTM STP 254, American Society for
Testing and Materials, 1959, pp. 308-317.
[8] Whitman, R. V., Roberts, J. E. and Man, S., "One Dimensional Compression and Wave
Velocity Tests, and Responses of Soil to Dynamic Loads," Report 4, Publ. 106, Soil Engi-
neering Division, Department of Civil and Sanitary Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of
of Technology, Cambridge, Mass., 1960.
[9] Shackel, B., Australian Road Research, Vol. 4, No. 5, 1970, pp. 12-31.
[10] Gau, F. L. and Olson, R. E., Journal of Materials, Vol. 6, 1971, pp. 874--888.
[11] Kirkpatrick, W. M. and Rennie, I. A. in Proceedings, International Symposium on Soil
Structure, Gothenburg, 1973, pp. 103-111.
[12] Jennings, J. E. B. and Knight, K., Transactions, South African Institute of Civil
Engineers, Vol. 6, 1956, pp. 255-256.
[13] Barden, L., Madedor, A. O. and Sides, G. R., Journal of Soil Mechanics and Founda-
tions Division, American Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 95, 1969, pp. 33-51.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
T. Y. Chu' and S. N. Chen 2
Laboratory Preparation of
Specimens for Simulating Field
Moisture Conditions of Partially
Saturated Soils
ABSTRACT: Due to the significant effect of soil moisture on the behavior character-
istics of a soil, one of the primary requirements in the preparation of specimens of
a partially saturated soil is to simulate the suction in the soil under prevalent field
conditons. This objective may be achieved by the conditioning or pretesting treatment
of a soil specimen, so that a desired suction in the specimen is attained prior to
testing. Relatively simple equipment such as that described in this paper, is suitable
for the required treatment of specimens representing partially saturated soils. This
paper presents results of undrained triaxial tests and repeated loading tests on soil
specimens treated by using the equipment mentioned previously. Test data from
specimens without any suction treatment are presented for comparison purposes.
Information obtained from these experiments indicates that the simulation of the
field moisture condition of a soil cannot be achieved simply by reproducing the
field moisture content of the soil. The conditioning or pretesting treatment of soil
specimens by using apparatus such as that presented in this paper is believed to be
a preferable method for the purpose of simulating field moisture conditions.
229
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed9
Copyright 1976 by by ASTM International www.astm.org
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
230 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
water content, and the degree of saturation. In the case of saturated soils,
the objective of simulating field moisture conditions is often achieved by
saturating specimens of desired density and soil structure with water, as
well as by the application of a back pressure to the soil water, if necessary.
On the other hand, laboratory preparations of specimens for simulating
the field moisture conditions of unsaturated or partially saturated soils
are sometimes rather complicated, due to the need for elaborate equipment
and time-consuming procedures.
This paper presents a relatively simple apparatus which has been
developed primarily for the aforementioned objective in the case of
partially saturated soils. The procedures involved are also comparatively
simple. While the test results presented in this paper are based on the
use of remolded specimens only, the developed equipment and procedures
may be applied equally well in the preparation of undisturbed soil
specimens prior to laboratory testing.
The developed equipment and procedure for specimen treatment prior
to laboratory testing may be applied for determining the behavior charac-
teristics of partially saturated soils, as required in the design of pavements,
foundations, and different types of retaining and earth structures. For
instance, in the design of pavement structures, it is desirable to determine
the subgrade characteristics at the anticipated field moisture conditions.
This objective may be achieved by using the developed method for
specimen treatment prior to subgrade evaluation tests. At the present
time, the commonly used methods for specimen treatment in connection
with subgrade evaluation tests include the saturation of test specimens by
evacuation or complete immersion in water and the capillary absorption
by the Texas procedure, as discussed elsewhere in this paper. In previous
studies [1--4],3 however, subgrade soils below pavements were seldom found
to be saturated or close to saturation, as represented by specimens treated
by the methods mentioned previously. The findings from these studies
indicate that, in areas of relatively high ground-water table, subgrade
moisture variations may be predicted, according to the equilibrium
suctions of the subgrade soils, provided that frost actions are not expected
to occur in the subgrade. For this reason, the developed method for
specimen treatment presented in this paper appears to be a preferable
procedure in comparison with other methods for treating subgrade
specimens prior to testing.
~The italic numbers in brackets refer to the list o f references appended to this paper.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
CHU AND CHEN ON PARTIALLY SATURATED SOILS 231
Kansas Method
In the Kansas method [5] for laboratory preparation prior to testing,
soil specimens are saturated with water by evacuation. In view of the fact
that subgrade soils below pavements usually are not saturated to the same
extent as that of the laboratory specimens prepared according to the
procedure just mentioned, correction factors, such as those formulated
in the Kansas method for pavement design, are to be used in the application
of test results for pavement design purposes.
Texas Method
The basic procedure for pretesting treatment in the Texas method [6] is
to allow water to move upward into a remolded soil specimen by
capillary absorption. The capillary flow of water is accomplished by keep-
ing the soil specimen (resting on a porous stone) at 0.5 in. above the
water level in a pan provided in the treatment assembly. While the Texas
method may be considered as an improvement of the other methods
described previously, insofar as the simulation of field moisture con-
ditions of subgrade soils is concerned, it appears that the particular setup
might be satisfactory in simulating the subgrade moisture conditions at
certain sites and might not be satisfactory for the same purpose at other
locations. In other words, some flexibility in the treatment assembly is
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
232 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
Other Methods
Seed et al [7,8] developed a method for preparing and conditioning
soil specimens to simulate closely the field condition of a soil with respect
to its density, soil structure, and degree of saturation. Using their method,
specimens are prepared either by kneading compaction at a moisture
content "dry of optimum" or by static compaction "wet of optimum."
In either case, the compacted specimens are soaked to the desired degree
of saturation. It was reported that the procedure of using kneading com-
paction dry of optimum and subsequent soaking would require considerable
time and effort in achieving the desired degree of saturation. The soil
water suction of a partially saturated soil specimen is not controlled or
measured in this method for specimen preparation and conditioning.
If it is desirable to control the soil water suction of a partially saturated
soil specimen during pretesting treatment, apparatus such as those
developed by Escario [9] and Alpan [10] for conducting swelling tests of
expansive clays might be suitable, provided that necessary modifications
are made in regard to the equipment and the related procedures. The use
of these elaborate apparatus, however, is expected to require considerable
time and effort in carrying out the desired treatment, prior to testing.
For this reason, one of the considerations in developing the new method
for pretesting treatment, as described herein, is to make the equipment
and procedures relatively simple, so that this method may be applicable
for routine tests in connection with subgrade evaluation or for other pur-
poses.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
CHU AND CHEN ON PARTIALLY SATURATED SOILS 233
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
234 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
arent
c tubing
~ / - - - Graduated
>~ _ _ ~ g ~ lass tube
Legend:
i. 2-in. dia, 4-in. high soil specimen.
2. Ceramic plates.
3. Filter papers.
4. Rubber membrane.
5. Cylinder for providing lateral
pressure on the soil specimen. p l a s t i c tubing
6. Rubber covers.
7. Chambers filled with de-aired water.
8. Transparent plastic cylinder.
9. Guide to keep the upper unit in
proper position.
i0. Cover to prevent evaporation.
ii. Ring to provide a pool of water
during preparation for specimen treatment.
12. Connection for applying desired lateral
pressure.
FIG. l--Setup for pretesting treatment of a soil specimen to simulate field moisture
conditions.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
CHU AND CHEN ON PARTIALLY SATURATED SOILS 235
FIG. 2--Photograph showing the base chamber of the apparatus for treating specimens
of partially saturated soils.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
236 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
above the lower ceramic plate may be created by pouring water into the
area within the ring (marked as No. 11 in Fig. 1). The purpose of pro-
viding this pool of water is to assure that good contact exists among the
specimen, the filter paper, and the ceramic plate. Any air entrapped in
the contact areas may interfere with the successful completion of the
intended treatment.
3. Place the specimen in the treatment assembly and apply the sur-
charge, as well as the confining pressure (lateral pressure), on the speci-
men. At the same time, apply the desired suction by adjusting the water
level in the graduated glass tube. If mercury is used instead of water, as
mentioned previously, adjust the mercury column to provide the desired
suction.
4. When a moisture equilibrium condition is reached (as indicated by a
nearly constant water level in the graduated glass tube over a period of
time), remove the specimen from the treatment assembly.
The height, diameter, and weight of a specimen are to be determined
before and after the treatment to obtain the necessary data for com-
puting the change in density, moisture content, and the degree of satura-
tion. The treated specimens may be used for any desired laboratory test,
such as the undrained triaxial compression test and the repeated loading
test. Both types of test were performed in this study.
Laboratory Compaction
z
Test a E~
Percent Passing Atterberg
0
Sieve No. Limits AASHTO Max Dry Optimum -1-
Classifica- Specific Density, Moisture 111
z
Site No. 4 10 40 200 LL PL PI tion Gravity lb/ft 3 Content, %
0
Z
57 98 95 75 24 ...... NP A-2-4 2.74 101.2 17.5
"o
58 ... 100 95 63 43 37 10 A-5(6) 2.74 97.7 23.5
80 100 97 58 18 ...... NP A-2-4 2.65 120.5 9.3 -4
NOTES-- LL = liquid limit. I'-
I"
-<
PL = plastic limit.
PI = plasticity index. 60
NP = nonplastic.
I lb/ft 3 = 157 N / m L
m
E~
aASTM Tests for Moisture-Density Relations of Soils, Using 5.5-1b Rammer and 12-in. Drop (D 698-70). o
GO
-,,4
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
co
oo
T A B L E 2--Summary of data from undrained triaxial tests with 10 psi confining pressure.
co
As-molded Condition Condition before Testing O
Modulus Maximum r'-
Suction Level Dry Moisture Degree o f Dry Moisture Degree o f of Deviator o9
-v
in Pretesting Density, Content, Saturation, Density, Content, Saturation, Elasticity, Stress, m
Specimen No. Treatment lb/ft 3 % 07o lb/ft 3 % 07o psi psi _~
tl1
57-1 no treatment 96.6 17.6 62 96.6 17.6 62 1100 16.5 Z
57-2 3 ft 95.5 17.8 62 91.3 22.8 71 670 15.3 "u
~u
57-3 95.5 17.8 62 91.5 22.7 72 700 13.0 m
57-4 1 ft 95.0 17,8 61 89.2 26.5 80 490 9.5
57-5 95.4 17.8 62 90.8 24.5 76 520 11.2 ~
57-6 2.5 in. 95.0 17.8 61 86.0 31.5 88 310 8.0
58-1 no treatment 94.5 23.6 80 94.5 23.6 80 2490 29.5
58-2 93.6 23.6 79 93.6 23.6 79 2780 28.0 Z
58-3 3 ft 93.2 23.5 77 91.8 26.9 86 1300 15.8 -n
58-4 1 ft 93.3 24.0 78 90.7 28.5 89 830 8.4 O
58-5 2.5 in. 93.2 23.5 78 87.3 31.0 88 670 6.2
I'-
58-6 3 ft 98.0 24.0 89 94.6 27.2 92 1500 24.0 3~
58-7 98.0 24.0 89 94.5 26.8 91 1800 28.2 u0
O
58-8 i ft 98.0 24.0 89 94.0 28.4 95 1100 12.2
58-9 2.5 in. 98.0 24.0 89 93.5 28.5 95 600 10.0
80-1 3 ft 121.0 8.8 65 120.8 9.0 66 2280 22.8 O
80-2 1 ft 121.0 8.8 65 120.5 9.4 67 1600 18.5 -<
80-3 2.5 in. 121.0 8.8 65 120.0 11.2 79 930 11.8 .~
ITI
fD
N O T E S - - T h e specimens are numbered in such a way that the first two n u m b e r s are referring to the site where the soil samples were obtained. .-I
I lb/ft 3 = 157 N / m 3, 1 psi = 6900 N / m 2, l ft = 0.3048 m. 1 in. = 0.0254 m,
Specimens 58-1 through 58-5 have relatively low densities.
Specimens 58-6 through 58-9 have relatively high densities.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
CHU AND CHEN ON PARTIALLY SATURATED SOILS 239
the specimen. For specimens 4 in. in height, as used in this study, the
average tension in the specimen is 2.5 in. For the low plasticity or non-
plastic soils used in this study, there is little or no difference between the
tension or the suction of these soils. The time required for completing
the treatment of all specimens employed in this study was less than one
week.
As indicated in Table 2, four groups of specimens having similar
initial dry densities and moisture contents (see the columns under "As-
molded Condition" in this table) were prepared in this series of experi-
ments. According to the density and moisture data in the columns under
"Condition before Testing," substantial swelling of the specimens pre-
pared by using soils from Sites 57 and 58 occurred during the treatment.
The appreciable volume change during treatment is believed to be pri-
marily due to the micaceous composition of the soils. If it is desirable
to minimize the volume change of a specimen during the treatment,
extremely high surcharge and lateral pressures would have to be applied
on the specimen. The use of extremely high pressures, however, will
result in an increase in the time needed to complete the treatment.
Furthermore, the high degree of confinement of a specimen during
treatment is likely to cause a less uniform condition with respect to the
density and moisture content within the specimen (after the treatment)
than that found when a relatively low pressure level is maintained during
the treatment.
The modulus of elasticity and the maximum deviator stress determined
by undrained triaxial tests are also presented in Table 2. As expected, the
test data indicate that, in the case of soil specimens subjected to pre-
testing treatment, an increase in the suction level maintained during
treatment results in a corresponding increase in the modulus of elasticity
and the maximum deviator stress of the specimen. This general trend of
variation is true for all the samples tested. It is to be noted that, for soils
from Sites 57 and 58, the triaxial test data obtained from specimens with-
out treatment are included in Table 2. On the basis of the data in regard
to the degree of saturation of the soil specimens before testing and the
information from supplemental experiments, including tensiometer tests
[17] and pressure plate extractor tests [3], the suction in any of the
specimens without treatment was found to be higher than those in the
treated specimens. For this reason, the modulus of elasticity and the
maximum deviator stress of the specimens tested without treatment were
found to be higher than those of the treated specimens. A comparison of
stress-strain curves of both treated specimens and the one without treat-
ment, prepared by using the soil from Site 58, is presented in Fig. 3.
In addition to the undrained triaxial compression tests described pre-
viously, specimens with or without treatment were employed in repeated
loading triaxial tests. Figure 4 illustrates the sinusoidal loading pattern
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorize
240 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
35 I I I ! I l
/."- O"b'-.,O,,"
!
25
i
I
I
?
20 !
e~ | X----Specimen No. 58-3
if}
I ~ ( 3-ft suction )
I
9
Specimen No. 58-4
~ ( l-ft suction )
.VfV..--V"-- ~"" --V
i0
/
/~ ~ Specimen No. 58-5
( 2.5-in. suction )
~/ ..O~'"_O------O----~-...43
0 i 2 3 4 5 6 7
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
CHU AND CHEN ON PARTIALLY SATURATED SOILS 241
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
'g 5
"~~~0.550"~60 I Resilient
strain
oso 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Time(onesecondpergrid)
FIG, 4--Illustration o f the pattern in stress and strain variations in a repeated loading
triaxial test (Specimen 58-17, l lO-th through l l4-th load applications).
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
b~
4~
O~
0
T A B L E 3--Summary of data from repeated loading triaxial tests with 10 psi confining pressure. t'-
CD
Test Date at Number of Load Applications m
(NLA) Shown O
As-molded Condition Condition before Testing NLA = 100 NLA = 10000 m
z
Equipment Suction Level Dry Moisture Degree of Dry Moisture Degree of "U
Residual Resilient Residual Resilient
for in Pretesting Density, Content, Saturation, Density, Content, Saturation, Strain, Modulus, Strain, Modulus, m
Specimen No. Compaction Treatment lb/ft j 070 070 lb/ft ~ % 070 070 ksi 070 ksi
XI
57-7 no treatment 99.0 17.0 65 99.0 17.0 65 1.33 12.9 1.48 15.7 ~:~
57-8 drop 99.0 17.8 68 95.0 23.4 76 -4
3ft 4.80 11.0 5.05 13.7
57-9 hammer 99.0 17.6 67 95.0 23.4 76 5.15 10.6 5.28 11.7 k./Z
58-10 no treatment 98.1 24.5 91 98.1 24.5 91 0.35 24.3 0.38 30.6
58-11 drop 97.1 24.8 90 94.0 27.4 92 "11
1.55 12.1 1.70 21.6 C)
58-12 hammer 3 ft 97.2 24.8 90 93.7 27.8 93 1.70 12.9 1.80 20.5 ~0
58-13 97.0 24.8 90 93.3 27.5 91 1.90 16.0 2.15 21.0 r'-
58-14 kneading 3 ft 97.5 24.8 91 96.5 26.3 94 0.90 17.8 1.10 22.8 ~:~
58-15 97.3 24.8 91 96.5 26.2 93
58-16 compactor 0.75 16.6 0.85 24.3 I~
97.0 24.8 90 96.3 26.2 93 1.20 17.4 1.26 24.3 O
"3"1
58-17 93.5 27.5 91 93.5 27.5 91
58-18 drop 0.55 20.0 0.59 27.4
93.2 27.5 91 93.2 27.5 91 0.60 21.0 0.64 27.6 --4
0
no treat n~ent
58-19 hammer 94.0 27.5 92 94.0 27.5 92 0.80 20.5 0.93 25.8 -rl
58-20 93.2 27.5 91 93.2 27.5 91 0.63 19.1 0.65 25.0 "<
--4
N O T E - - I ft = 0.305 m, I lb/ft 3 : 157 N/m 3, 1 ksi = 6.9 x 106 N / m L m
O~
,-I
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
CHU AND CHEN ON PARTIALLY SATURATED SOILS 243
General Conclusion
Results from undrained triaxial tests and repeated loading tests on
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authoriz
0.4 i il I ' I
.... Specimen No. 58-17- 7
_o
0.6 U-
6O
-Q
"'" "''" """ "'"" ....... / Specimen No .~811"8 m
0.8 - Y ~ " 9 -...~ 0.... / / o
' ".... ""'V-- L_ Specimen No. 58-20
4J " / ~ .................Ir...... -y...... m
/ z
o 1.0 Specimen No. 58-19 "o
-,m
m
"o
g 1.2 Note: Specimens 58-11 through 58-13 were treated
~ with 3-ft suction. No treatment for
Specimens 58-17 through 58-209 -I
g 5
1.4 z
0
.N ~'--.~........ V- "--'"" .... ~ ~ - S p e c i m e n No. 58-11
m 1.6
i'-
>
0
"11
1.8
0
"11
2.0 '"~....... z._ Specimen No. 58-12
"~"~""M---..~............__-r Specimen No. 58-13 .-I
m
2.2 I I I .--I
FIG. 5--Effect o f the pretesting treatment on the residual strain o f soil specimens.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
30 L I I I
I Specimen No. 58-18 ~ --.--ll-----" --1---
I
b Specimen No. 58-17 - - - - "-' m ~ ", , ~ .----
.o -- ~"-" ". ~. . . . . ~ . . . .
! ~ - ~--S~e~men~o5820 O
I
C
9~ l . . - . ~ ~ me~~o. 58-19 ..... ~--- >
20 .... .. .. . . . . . ~ ,.~ ' - - - - 5
.--- = ~ =..-u-- --'"
~" ~ ~ " "- "L-.':- =-"
O
-r
I Specimen No. 58-13 ---~...~~ ~'" j'~.>--~" m
~=~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X--"" v ,,__~, s - z
. . . . . . . . ...C;.~-
O
~-- Specimen No. 58-12 ..---"~.-" z
= \ . ~o---'" "" .: -- -u
>
"~ 10 { l'_~'-_L'-f_-2"~-~ -v- -4
>
Specimen No. 58-11 r-
r-
.<
09
Note: Specimens 58-11 through 58-13
w e r e treated w i t h 3-ft suction. c
-n
No treatment for Specimens >
58-17 through 58-20. -4
m
I I I 09
10 100 1000 10,000 o
i00,000 F"
09
Number of Load A p p l i c a t i o n s
~O
FIG. 6--Effectofpretestingtmatmentontheresilient modulus ofsoHspecimens. O1
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
246 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
partially saturated soils presented in this paper indicate that the soil water
suction in a test specimen is an important factor affecting the stress-
strain characteristics of the soil. Consequently, one of the primary re-
quirements in the preparation of specimens of a partially saturated soil
is to simulate the suction in the soil under prevalent field conditions.
To satisfy this requirement, it is necessary to include the step of con-
ditioning or pretesting treatment during the preparation of soil specimens
for laboratory testing. The method of treatment as described in this paper
is believed to be suitable for the aforementioned purpose, provided that
the desired suction level during treatment is relatively low. If extremely
high suction levels are to be maintained during treatment, apparatus and
procedures much more complicated than those reported in this paper
would be required.
Acknowledgments
The investigations in this study were conducted at the University of
South Carolina and were mostly in connection with a subgrade moisture
research project sponsored by the South Carolina State Highway Depart-
ment and the Federal Highway Administration. The authors wish to
express their appreciation to all who have assisted in the research project
and to some of the staff members in the soils department, Tippetts-
Abbett-McCarthy-Stratton Engineers and Architects, New York, for their
assistance during the preparation of this paper.
References
[1] Aitchison, G. D. and Richards, B. G. in Moisture Equilibria and Moisture Changes
in Soils Beneath Covered Areas, Butterworth, Australia, 1965.
[2] Russam, K., "Subgrade Moisture Studies by the British Road Research Laboratory,"
Highway Research Record No. 301, 1970, pp. 5-17.
[3] Chu, T. Y., Humphries, W. K., and Chen, S. N. in Proceedings, 3rd International
Conference on the Structural Design of Asphalt Pavements, 1972, pp. 53-66.
[4] Chu, T. Y. et al, "Soil Moisture as a Factor in Subgrade Evaluation," to be published
in Conference Proceedings, American Society of Civil Engineers Pavement Design
Specialty Conference, 1975.
[5] Kansas State Highway Commission, "Design of Flexible Pavements Using the
Triaxial Compression Test," Bulletin 8, Highway Research Board, 1947.
[6] McDowell, C., "Road Test Findings Utilized in Analysis of Texas Triaxial Method of
Pavement Design," The AASHO Road Test, Proceedings of a Conference held May
1962, St. Louis, Mo., Special Report 73, Highway Research Board, 1962.
[7] Seed, H. B., Chan, C. K., and Lee, C. E. in Proceedings, 1962 International
Conference on Structural Design of Asphalt Pavements, University of Michigan,
Ann Arbor, Mich., 1963, pp. 611-636.
[8] Monismith, C. L., Seed, H. B., Mitry, F. G., and C'han, C. K. in Proceedings,
Second International Conference on the Structural Design of Asphalt Pavements,
1968, pp. 109-140.
[9] Escario, V. in Proceedings, Second International Research and Engineering Conference
on Expansive Clay Soils, 1969, pp. 207-217.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
CHU AND CHEN ON PARTIALLY SATURATED SOILS 247
[10| Alpah, I. in Proceedings, 4th Imernational Conference Soil Mechanics and Founda-
tions Engineering, Vol. I, 1957, p. 3.
[11] Burland, J. B., Moisture Equilibria and Moisture Changes in Soils Beneath Covered
Areas, Butterworths, Australia, 1965, p. 270.
[12] Aitchison, G. D. and Richards, B. D. in Proceedings, Second International Research
and Engineering Conference on Expansive Clay Soils, 1969, pp. 66-84.
[13] Hunt, J. E. in Special Procedures for Testing Soil and Rock for Engineering Pur-
poses, A S T M STP 479, American Society for Testing and Materials, 1970, pp. 192-197.
[14] Croney, D., Coleman, J. D., and Black, W. P. M., "Movement and Distribution of
Water in Relation to Highway Design and Performance," Special Report 40, Highway
Research Board, 1958, pp. 226-252.
[15] Aitchison, G. D. et al in Moisture Equilibria and Moisture Changes in Soils Beneath
Covered Area, Butterworths, Australia, 1965, p. 7.
[16] Chu, T. Y. and Mou, C. H. in Proceedings, Third International Conference on
Expansive Soils, 1973, pp. 177-185.
[17] Taylor, S. A., Evans, D. D., and Kemper, W. D., "Evaluating Soil Water," Bulletin
426, Agricultural Experiment Station, Utah State University, Logan, 1961, pp. 29-33.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
R. T. Donaghe' and F. C. Townsend'
L a b o r a t o r y tests t o d e t e r m i n e c o m p a c t i o n characteristics o f e a r t h - r o c k
m i x t u r e s for use in field c o n t r o l h a v e b e e n subject t o q u e s t i o n for m a n y
years. D u e t o l i m i t a t i o n s o f e q u i p m e n t size, l a b o r a t o r y tests a r e g e n e r a l l y
p e r f o r m e d o n s m a l l s p e c i m e n s , thus p l a c i n g a limit o n t h e m a x i m u m
d i a m e t e r o f t h e particles w h i c h c a n b e used in the specimens. M a n y
l a b o r a t o r i e s , i n c l u d i n g t h o s e o f t h e C o r p s o f Engineers, scalp o v e r s i z e d
particles o f full-scale s p e c i m e n s a n d r e p l a c e t h e particles with an equal
p e r c e n t a g e , b y weight, o f smaller p a n i c l e s , a s s u m i n g t h a t results f r o m
tests p e r f o r m e d in small m o l d s o n such m a t e r i a l are c o m p a r a b l e to t h o s e
U.S. Army civil engineering technician and research engineer, respectively, Soils Research
Facility, Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Miss. 39180.
248
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed
Copyright9 1976 by by ASTM International www.astm.org
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
DONAGHE AND TOWNSEND ON SCALPING AND REPLACEMENT 249
Procedure
Equipment
A mechanical compactor, manufactured by Howard Company and
equipped with 5.5 and 24.7-1b rammers, having face diameters of 2.0
and 6.0 in., respectively, was used to perform the testing. Large-scale
tests were performed using an 18-in.-diameter mold and 24.7Ab rammer,
while small-scale tests were performed using a 6-in.-diameter mold and
5.5-1b rammer. A special harness for suspending the 18-in.-diameter mold
and specimen from a forklift was rigged with an electronic load cell,
sensitive to within 0.1 lb, to obtain the specimen-plus-mold weights. A
photograph of the compactor, the 24.7-1b rammer, the 18-in.-diameter
mold, and the weighing harness is shown in Fig. 1.3 All other weights
ZThe Corps of Engineers scalping and replacement procedure for materials containing
particles larger than 2 in. for compactingin a 12-in.-diametermoldis givenin the appendix.
3The 12-in.-diameter mold shown with the weighing harness was not used in this in-
vestigation.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
ol
0
T A B L E l--Summary o f compaction data.
co
O
M a x Dry Optimum I-"
Type o f Gravel Fines Unit Weight Water
Compactor Mold Dia, Max Particle Content, Content, ),a, w,
rn
Effect Investigated Used in. Size 070 070 lb/ft 3 07o
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
Gravel content (small-scale tests) hand-held No. 4 sieve 0 25 132.6 8.0
3Aa 10 132.5 7.8
20 131.8 7.9
30 132.0 7.9 O
40 z
132.0 7.9
50 129.3 8.0
60 32
128.5 9.2 m
100 101.2 ...c
Fines content (large-scale tests) mechanical 18 3b 40 15 141.8 4.9 Z
o
25 138.0 5.9
.-I
35 133.3 7.5 0
Fines content (small-scale tests) mechanical 6 90 40 15 134.8 7.4 z
25 131.1 7.9
m
35 126.6 9.4 Z
r'-
z
o
m
"10
r'-
m
m
z
..-t
bO
...g
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
252 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
FIO. l--Howard mechanical compactor with 12 and 18-in.-diameter molds and load
cell harness f o r weighing.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
DONAGHE AND TOWNSEND ON SCALPING AND REPLACEMENT 253
Material
The materials tested in this investigation consisted of a subrounded to
subangular washed gravel, having a maximum particle size of 3 in., a
subrounded to subangular concrete mortar sand, and a clay (CL), com-
bined according to the gradations given in Figs. 2 and 3. Classification
data for the clay and sand are given in Fig. 4.
Specimen Preparation
Batches for specimens were prepared by thoroughly mixing a pre-
determined amount of sand and CL material mixture (minus No. 4
material) with a measured quantity of water, using either a commercial
kitchen mixer or a pugmill (specimens tested in 4 and 6-in.-diameter
molds were mixed with the kitchen mixer). The resulting minus No. 4
material was then stored in airtight containers and allowed to cure for a
period of at least 16 h. The plus No. 4 material for each batch was
prepared by combining the air-dry portion (by weight) of material required
for each sieve and then storing the resulting material in containers filled
with water. Immediately prior to compaction, the cured minus No. 4 frac-
tion was mixed with the saturated surface-dry aggregate. Each layer was
hatched separately to prevent any variations in grading between layers.
4The italic numbers in brackets refer to the list of references appended to this paper.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
254 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
DONAGHE AND TOWNSEND ON SCALPING AND REPLACEMENT 255
.O
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
t~
r
0
r-
"IJ
m
o_
m
z
"u
:I1
m
-o
"in
-t
r-
0.'n
-t
m
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
DONAGHE AND TOWNSEND ON SCALPING AND REPLACEMENT 257
Testing Procedure
Table 2 lists pertinent data concerning the rammer sizes and the com-
paction procedure. All specimens were compacted in three layers, using
compactive efforts made approximately equal to the standard effort
(12 300 ft. lb/ft 3) by adjusting the number of blows.
Effects of Equipment
Figure 5 presents results of tests performed, using both large- and
small-scale equipment, on scalped and replaced specimens and minus
No. 4 sieve specimens, having gravel contents of 40 and 0 percent, with
25 percent fines. The data indicate that, for both gradations, maximum
dry unit weight and optimtun water content varied with the different
sizes of equipment used. Optimum water contents of the 0 and 40 per-
cent gravel specimens were decreased by 1.7 and 0.6 percent, respectively,
when the 18-in.-diameter mold and 24.7-1b rammer were used in place of
the 6-in.-diameter mold and 5.5-1b rammer. The maximum dry unit
weight of both materials was increased by 3.0 lb/fP for the same change
in sizes of equipment. This difference in maximum dry unit weight falls
within a range comparable to that determined by previous investigators
[2-4], who indicated that the variation in densities determined using
various mold sizes was limited to not more than 4 lb/ft 3. Since only
limited testing was performed to determine the effects of variation in
equipment size, no attempt was made to correct other test results for
these effects. When comparisons which involve both large- and small-
scale test results are made, however, it appears safe to assume that dif-
ferences in densities due to varying the size of equipment used are
limitied to not more than 4 lb/ft 3.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions autho
Ol
Oo
t,D
__q
I'-
fD
"O
m
o
m
z
TABLE 2--Compaction tests using hand-heM sliding weight rammer and Howard mechanical compactor.
m
"o
Rammer a Blows per Coverage
Complete
Mold Compactive Dia of Blows Coverage Along At -t
Dia, Effort, Weight, Circular Drop, No. of per of Circumfer- Center of z
in. ft'lb/ft ~ lb Face, in. in. Layers Layer Mold Area enceof Mold Specimen
"11
O
:lJ
6 12 420 5.5 2 12 3 56 2 24 4
18 12 299 24.7 6 24 3 220 7 24 b 6c t--
t~
aCompaction equipment used: hand and mechanical compaction: 6-in.-dia mold, mechanical compaction: 18-in.-dia mold. O
:D
bPius 6 on last coverage.
Cplus 4 on last coverage.
O
-<
.--I
m
(D
-4
O
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
DONAGHE AND TOWNSEND ON SCALPING AND REPLACEMENT 259
T E S T GRADATIONS
4SIEVE 0PENINGS=I = SIEVE NUMBERS
3 3/4 4 10 40 200
I00 0
-I i\ i !~---o~ cr
8 O -I 20
Z
E
F-
60
-I
-I
I
I "i\[ i \ U
-I I I
7 I I
~4o I ' ~ '
6o
-I
Q. j w
2 0 rl I I ~ BO Q.-
I 1 I
I I I
i' I I I I00
GRAVEL : ! : SAND : ]: FINES~
140
135
Q.
40%Gr(18"MO V'LD~~.~
~~
I.-
:I:
,,:}
bJ
I--
,25 I
O~Gr( ~ xll
c}
115 I I I I .I
2 4 6 8 10 12
WATER CONTENT p ~
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
260 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
TEST GRADATIONS
Z
,"~,..\ ,I ,l r~.
k,-
I-
60 _, ~. M~.~~..~; 4o <
I U
Z -I
t-
4o -I
6o z
l,J
D_
20 I i so
I I
,) I
4 GRAVEL L 9 SAND " -- I ~ FINES~
1 4 0 --
3"MAX(FULL. ~ ~ n
SCALESPECIMEN)~ ~l~ N)O0
135
5~
O.
~" 130
h- ANDREPLACEDSPECIMEN)
I
0
Z 125
MAX. P A R T I C L E
120 SIZE, IN,
::]/4 3
115 I I I I I
4 6 8 l0 )2
WATER C O N T E N T t ='7o
FIG. 6--Compaction curves for tests to determine effect of removal and replacement
of oversize particles.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
DONAGHE AND TOWNSEND ON SCALPING AND REPLACEMENT 261
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized
262 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
TEST GRADATIONS
~SIEVE 0PENINGS~i = SIEVE NUMBERS--
3 3/4 4 10 40 200
100 0
~ I I
- ~ , 10~
8O 20
uJ
or I I
Z c,-' ~ \ \ i I <
E 60 -i-,, ,-, G;~\\'N I 4O O
u
Z Gr" II"
~4o o 6o ~"
I
20 -I o 80 a_
I I
I I l
-I "N I I I I00
SAND I= FINES~
140
50% Gr ~
135
40% Gr
U
~'0130 20~7o Gr
60% Gr
I-
'0
t.o
I'-
Z t25 NOTE: TESTS PERFORMED USING 18-1N. DIAM MOLDI AND
MECHANICAL COMPACTOR,
GRAVELCONTENT,%
120 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 1O0
115 I I I [ I
2 4 6 8 i0 12
WATER CONTENT~ 07o
FIG. 7--Compaction curves for tests performed on full-scale specimens having variable
gravel contents.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
P
M A X I M U M DRY U N I T WEIGHT )'dMAx~PCF OPTIMUM WATER C O N T E N T ~ aTo
5' : F,
O O O O
O -r
/
rrl
z
o
z
rm~ m
OO z
o
0
Z z
m z_ r-
ffJ
(31- 0
O~ >
~0 o,.2 r'-
"1
1-~ - 0
z
0-I 0
~0
z
o
m
"u
r'-
0
m
m
z
.-t
(~
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
264 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
TEST GRADATIONS
,o;:.%,,",,i
-I n,
I
E 6O -I 4o ~
I--
Z -I U
p-
I
~ 4o -I 6o ~
Q. II w
20 I I I 80 a.
I I I
I I I
I I I
I00
GRAVEL SAND I~ FINES~
140
NOTE: TESTS PERFORMED USING 6-1N.-DIAM MOLD,
135
%
a_
;~130 -
z 20%G r ~ ~
o
w
30%Gr~
F-
Z 125-
40%G~50%Gr~
a
%Gr
GRAVEL CONTENT, %
120
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 100
OPT W, % 8.6 7.7 8.1 8.1 7.9 7,8 9.5 -*
MAX. ~/d' PCP 130.9 ~33,5 f32.5 132,3 131.1 131.9 129.5 103.6
" SINGLE POINT TEST PERFORMED ON D R Y M A T E R I A L .
115 I i I I I
2 4 6 8 I0 I?_..
WATER CONTENT; ~
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
DONAGHE AND TOWNSEND ON SCALPING AND REPLACEMENT 265
TEST GRADATIONS
"SIEVE OPENINGS=[ : SIEVE NUMBERS
3 3/4 4 I0 40 200
I00 o
o~__' I
8O t
I
LI
l
~ I
I
20 ac
uJ
Z I
~- 60 -I
I-
Z
I c~i , t--
~4o -I G 6o ,.z,
5
0. %,
20 I ~T I I ao ~-
I I I
,, I
I
I
F
100
I.
i
140 --
135 --
I,i_
u
o_
~130
p-
"r
L~ 20% Gr
b
bJ
a
ii,,~"'t- 60% Gr
GRAVEL CONTENT, %
120
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 100
OPT W, % 8.0 7.8 7.9 7.9 7.9 8.0 9.2 --*
MAX. ~d' PCF 132.6 132.5 131.8 132.0 132.0 129.3 128.5 101.2
115 I I I I I
2 4 6 8 I0 12
WATER CONTENT/ 07o
FIG. l O--Compaction curves for small-scale tests performed on specimens having scalped
and replaced coarse particles with variable gravel contents by hand-held compactor.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
266 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
DONAGHE AND TOWNSEND ON SCALPING AND REPLACEMENT 267
suited in an increase in maximum dry unit weight o f 4.1 lb/ft 3 and a de-
crease in o p t i m u m water content o f 1.2 percent, whereas a change in fines
content from 15 to 35 percent resulted in a 8.5 lb/ft ~ decrease in maxi-
TEST GRADATIONS
~SIEVE OPENINGS'I 9 SIEVE NUMBERS--
3 3/4 4 10 40 200
|00 \ I , I I I
\ I I i
I I I I
I I I
8O ' ' I 20
~ L i i I ,
Z
L~ 60
Z Fi t---
~4o 6o ~
13.
',~ ~ ~; ~.~
2O i I
I I
I I I00
GRAVEL - SAND = I= FINES~
1 4 5 --
NOTE: TESTS PERFORMED USING 18-1N.-DIAM MOLD.
140 --
Lt_
u
0-
0%
I--
~ 13e_
J20 I I I I I
2 4 6 8 I0 12
WATER CONTE NT, eTo
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
268 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
mum dry unit weight and a 2.6 percent increase in optimtnn water con-
tent.
Scalped and Replaced Specimens--Compaction curves and test data for
small-scale tests on scalped and replaced specimens having 3A in. maxi-
mum particle sizes with fines contents of 15, 25, and 35 percent are
given in Fig. 12. The gravel content of each specimen was 40 percent.
These results, summarized in Fig. 13, show that the effect of fines con-
tent in the small-scale tests is similar to that in the large-scale tests. In
the small-scale tests, an increase in fines content from 15" to 35 percent
decreased the maximum dry unit weight 8.2 lb/fP and increased the
optimum water content 2.0 percentage points. By comparison, for the
same variation in fines content for the large-scale tests, the maximum dry
unit weight decreased 8.5 lb/ft 3, and the optimum water content in-
creased 2.6 percentage points. As in the case of tests performed to deter-
mine effects of varying gravel contents, the higher optimum water con-
tent values obtained for scalped and replaced specimens was probably
caused by a lower compactive effort being applied to the fines as a
result of interference of the gravel. The differences in maximum dry unit
weight between the scalped and replaced and the full-scale specimens,
indicated by the curves in Fig. 13, are due to the scalping and replacement
procedure and the effects of variation in equipment size.
yfOmyw
y~ = X 100 (i)
YsP~ + G.,ywP~
where
ya = calculated dry unit weight of total sample,
Yi = dry unit weight of finer fraction (from compaction tests on
scalped material),
G m = bulk specific gravity of coarser fraction (oversize material),
yw -- unit weight of water, and
Pi and Pc -- percent of fine and coarse material by weight of the sam-
ple.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
DONAGHE AND TOWNSEND ON SCALPING AND REPLACEMENT 269
TEST GRADATIONS
!
*SIEVE OPENINGS~'{ " ~ SIEVE NUMBERS
3 3/4 4 I0 40 200
I00 , I 0
'
I i
I i
n- 8O I I
2 0 ~c
td I !
Z cc
t,. 60 4o o~
j- U
z I I I I
I.-
,, ', 6o z
G. : I ~ ~ 25% F i
i
2O "1 I I 1 so
I 5%
J I I IO0
L
140
NOTE: TESTS PERFORMED USrNG 6-1N.-DIAM MOLD.
135
~" 130
%
t~
I-
Z 12~
o
o
FINES CONTENT, %
120 --
( G r = 40%)
115 I I I I I
2 4 6 B I0 IZ
WATER CONTENT I '='7o
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
270 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
12
/
~ I0
I--
Z
SCALPED AND REPLACED
SPECIMENS (6-1N,-DIAM MOLD)~
~ 8
/
/
/
o
J
"~ FULL-SC~LE SPECIMENS
I0 20 30 40 50
145
t,_ 1 4 0
Q.
\
\
N
\.
I- 1 3 5
-.... \
I-
Z
D
4
X
~[ 1 2 5
1,20
t0 20 30 40 50
FINES CONTENT~ 070 ( G r = 4 0 ~
FIG. 13--Optimum water content and maximum dry unit weight versus fines content for
full-scale and scalped and replaced specimens.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
DONAGHE AND TOWNSEND ON SCALPING AND REPLACEMENT 271
The equation is based on the assumption that the coarser particles simply
replace the finer material, with the density of the finer material remaining
constant. Generally, Yi is considered to be the density of minus No. 4
material. However, its value can be based upon other sizes. For example,
calculations can be made for plus 90 material, if the density of the
minus 90 material is known. In this case, P~ amd Pc are the percentages
of material finer and coarser than 90 in., respectively. The equation
makes no allowances for the interference of the coarser particles to the
compaction of the finer fraction at higher gravel contents. The gravel
content at which interference is initiated is referred to as the limiting
gravel content and is the gravel content at which a theoretical curve,
based on Eq 1, corrected for equipment effects, and the experimental
curve, begin to diverge. Tests performed by the U.S. Bureau of Reclama-
tion [8] have shown that, for poorly graded fractions, such as may result
from the scalping and replacement procedure, the limiting gravel content
may be less than 10 percent, while for well-graded coarse fractions, such
as might occur when the maximum particle size is increased to that of a
full-scale sample, the limiting gravel content may be as high as 35 to 40
percent.
(b) The FAA [9] uses the following equation to account for oversized
particles
where the terms are the same as those defined in Eq 1. The equation is
simply the weighted average of the densities of the finer and coarser
fractions, based on the percent by weight of each in the total sample. A
factor of 0.9 is used to account for the coarser particles interfering with
the compaction of the fine fraction.
Table 3 lists test data for small-scale tests conducted on minus No. 4
fractions of the full-scale samples, using a hand-held rammer and 4-in.-
diameter mold. These tests were conducted to provide input data for the
preceding equations. Figure 14 shows relationships between dry unit
weight and gravel content, developed using results of these tests with Eqs
1 and 2, along with experimental values obtained for the full-scale and
the scalped and replaced samples. As may be seen, the curves show that,
for gravel contents in the range from 0 to 50 percent, the use of Eq 1,
with results of tests performed on finer fractions, provides a better ap-
proximation of experimental results than does Eq 2 or the relationship
developed from tests performed on scalped and replaced samples. The
curve based on Eq 1 almost coincides with the experimental curve up to
the limiting gravel content of approximately 35 percent. The curve based
on Eq 2, on the other hand, indicates significantly lower maximum dry
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized
272 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
unit weight values than those indicated by the experimental curve for
gravel content in this same range (from 0 to 50 percent). At a gravel con-
tent of 40 percent, for example, the value computed using Eq 2 is 3.8
lb/fP less than the corresponding experimental value. Thus, it appears
that the use of results from tests performed on minus No. 4 fractions
of full-scale samples and Eq 1 would provide the most suitable means
of predicting densities of full-scale samples having gravel contents below
about 50 percent.
By comparison, results of the previous Corps of Engineers study [5] on
full-scale and scalped and replaced samples of a clayey sandy gravel
from DeGray Dam, having a gravel content of 54 percent, showed that
the scalping and replacing procedure gave slightly better estimates of the
full-scale maximum dry unit weights than did Eq 1. The maximum dry
unit weight of the full-size sample was 127.9 lb/fP, and the maximum dry
unit weight of the small-scale test on scalped and replaced material
underestimated this density by 4.3 lb/fP. On the other hand, Eq 1 over-
estimated the full-size maximum dry unit weight by 4.9 lb/fP. Most of
the error associated with Eq 1 is attributed to the increased particle
interference, which occurs at higher gravel content. In the case of Eq 2,
which considers particle interference through a correction factor of 0.9,
excellent agreement was obtained between the calculated maximum dry
unit weight, 128.1 lb/fP, and the observed value, 127.9 lb/fP. This agree-
ment by Eq 2, as opposed to the overestimation of Eq 1, indicates that
particle interference must be accounted for at higher gravel contents.
Relationships between fines content and maximum dry unit weight,
developed using Eqs 1 and 2, with results from tests performed on minus
No. 4 fractions of the full-scale samples, are given in Fig. 15. Also in-
cluded are experimental relationships developed from tests performed on
the full-scale and the scalped and replaced samples. These curves show
that, for tests in which the fines content is varied while maintaining the
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized
DONAGHE AND TOWNSEND ON SCALPING AND REPLACEMENT 273
170
1 T
EQUATIONS APPLIED TO DATA
GIVEN IN FIG. T A B L E GM = 2.58
160
/
THEORETICAL CURVE BASED ON /
SHOCKLEY'IS EQUATION (EQ I ) . . . . ~ /
b 150
THEORETICAL CURVE BASED 4/"
ON EAA EQUATION (EQ 2)~..~ /
/
. ~ 140
0
t-- q
1:30
o
g
120
-- - - EXPERINENTAL CURVE N N I
SCALPED AND REPLACED SPECIMENS~'~ ~ I
(6-1N,-DIAM M O L D ) ~ ~ - ~ \ I
IlO
I00
0 20 40 ~0 80 I O0
GRAVEL CONTENT.=, ~
FIG. 14--Experimental and theoretical relationships between maximum dry unit weight
and gravel content.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions autho
274 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
145
b
r
X
,,{
140
"%, ~~
.~
/= ~ r /
f
~----THEORETICAL CURVE BASED ON
SHOCKLEY'SEQUATION (EQ l)
I-
3: ~'X~
0
~
\~EXPERIMENTAL CURVE FULL-SCALE
\ P E CIMEN5 (78.1N-DIAM MOLD)
1:35
Z
x~
~z5 6
I0 20 30 40 50 60
FINES CONTENT, '~o
FIG. 15--Experimental and theoretical relationships between maximum dry unit weight
and fines content.
Conclusions
The results of this program of tests performed on blended earth-rock
material indicate the following conclusions.
(a) Maximum dry unit weight and optimum water content vary with
sizes of equipment used. When the mold diameter is increased from 6
to 18 in. and the rammer weight is increased from 5.5 to 24.7 lb, the
maximum dry unit weight of specimens containing 0 and 40 percent gravel
with 25 percent fines is increased by 3.0 lb/ft 3. For the same increase in
equipment size, the optimum water content for the specimen containing
no gravel is decreased by 1.7 percent, while that of the specimen
containing 40 percent gravel is decreased by 0.6 percent.
(b) The scalping and replacement procedure results in a lower maximum
dry unit weight and a higher optimum water content than obtained when
testing the full-scale specimen. In the case of tests performed using an 18-
in.-diameter mold on a full-scale and a scalped and replaced sample
having 40 percent gravel and 25 percent fines, the maximum dry unit
weight and optimum water content of the scalped and replaced sample is
3.9 lb/ft 3 lower and 1.4 percent higher, respectively, than the correspon-
ding values for the full-scale sample.
(c) For tests in which the gravel content is varied while maintaining
the fines content constant, the optimum gravel content, that is, gravel
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
DONAGHE AND TOWNSEND ON SCALPING AND REPLACEMENT 275
Acknowledgments
The tests described and the resulting data presented herein, unless
otherwise noted, were obtained from research conducted by the Water-
ways Experiment Station for the Civil Works Investigation Studies Pro-
gram sponsored by the Office, Chief of Engineers. Permission to publish
this information was granted by the Chief of Engineers. W. J. Hughes
was the principal engineering technical assisting in the laboratory pro-
gram. Additional personnel assisting in performing tests were Isaac
Smith, Jr., Mose Ellis, and R. L. January.
APPENDIX
The scalping and replacement procedure as outlined in Ref 1 follows:
(a) Spread the material to be tested in flat pans and air dry the entire sample.
Other means, such as ovens and heat lamps, may be used to accelerate drying if
the maximum drying temperature is 60 ~
(b) Reduce all aggregates, or lumps formed during drying, of fine-grained
material to particles finer than the No. 4 sieve. With a wire brush or other means,
remove all fine-grained material that may be clinging to rock sizes, taking care not
to lose the fine-grained material.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
276 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
(c) Separate all the material, using a set of sieves ranging from the largest
particle size in the sample to the No. 4 sieve. The total sample must be processed
to determine the as-received gradation.
(d) Place the material retained on each sieve and that passing the No. 4 sieve
in separate containers, weigh the contents of each, and compute the percent of
the total sample retained on each sieve as follows:
(e) If 10 percent or less of a field sample is retained on the 2-in. sieve, the
partides larger than this size should be discarded, and replacement is not necessary.
(]) If more than 10 percent of a field sample is retained on the 2-in. sieve, it will
be necessary to remove the plus 2-in. sizes, and replace them with an equal weight
of material between the 2-in. and No. 4 sieve sizes. The gradation of the replace-
ment material must be the same relative gradation as that of the total sample
between the 2-in. and the No. 4 sieve sizes. The percent passing the No. 4 sieve
remains constant and is equal to the percent passing the No. 4 sieve for the total
as-received sample. For each sieve between the 2-in. and the No. 4 sizes, the per-
cent required to replace the plus 2-in. sizes is computed as follows
References
[1] "Engineering and Design: Laboratory Soils Testing," Engineer Manual EM 1110-2-1906,
Office, Chief of Engineers, Department of the Army, Washington, D.C., Nov. 1970.
[2] Ziegler, E. J., "Effect of Material Retained on the Number 4 Sieve on the Compaction
Test of Soil," Proceedings, Highway Research Board, Vol. 28, 1948.
[3] Cunny, R. W. and Strohm, W. E., Jr., "Compaction Tests on Gravelly Soils with
Cohesive Soil Matrix," Miscellaneous Paper No. 3-676, U.S. Army Engineer Water-
ways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Miss., Oct. 1964.
[4] "Procedures and Equipment for Determining the Maximum Standard Compaction
Density of Granular Material (6 and 12 in. Diameter Molds)," U.S. Army Engineer
Division Laboratory, South Atlantic, March 1968.
[5] Donaghe, R. T. and Townsend, F. C., "Compaction Characteristics of Earth-Rock
Mixtures, Report 1, Vicksburg Silty Clay and DeGray Dam Clayey Sandy Gravel,"
Miscellaneous Paper No. S-73-25, U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station,
Vicksburg, Miss., May 1973.
[6] Holtz, W. G. and Lowitz, C. A., "Compaction Characteristics of Gravelly Soils,"
Earth Laboratory Report No. 509, U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, Sept. 1957.
[71 Shockley, W. G., "Correction of Unit Weight and Moisture Content for Soils Con-
taining Gravel Sizes," Technical Data Sheet No. 2, U.S. Army Engineer Waterways
Experiment Station, June 1948..
[8] U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, "Research on Compaction Control Testing of Gravelly
Soils," Earth Research Program, EM 662, 8 Aug. 1963.
5Any sieve between 2 in. and No. 4 sieve sizes.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
DONAGHE AND TOWNSEND ON SCALPING AND REPLACEMENT 277
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
P. Y. L e e I
Study of Irregular
Compaction Curves
KEY WORDS: soils, tests, compaction, clays, surface tension, soil mechanics,
density, clay minerals, water content
Many soils are too weak and unstable to perform adequately as good
engineering materials. Despite their inadequacies, many of these materials
must be used in engineering construction because it is not economically
feasible to bypass or replace them. To correct their deficiencies, such
soils must be stabilized. Various methods of stabilization are currently
used, but the most common and most useful method is that of soil com-
paction. The compaction process involves optimizing the water content
so that maximum density is reached, thereby providing the greatest
stability. For most soils commonly encountered in earth construction,
there is a single peak in the dry density versus moisture content relation-
ship (Fig. 1). In contrast to this, some soils yield compaction curves with
two peaks or a curve that is oddly shaped (Fig. 2). An acceptable and
La. 70118.
278
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed
Copyright9 1976 by by ASTM International www.astm.org
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
LEE ON IRREGULAR COMPACTION CURVES 279
m .
I I I I | ! i ! -
r~
~z
I I I I
MOISTURE CONTENT - % MOISTURE CONTENT - %
FIG. 1--Typical single peak compaction curve. FIG. 2--Irregular compaction curves.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
280 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
present, resulting in high shear strength and a low dry density. As water is
added, the effect is one of lubrication, thereby increasing the dry density.
At this point, water menisci begin to form, tending to increase the soil
strength by providing more particle contact area. The balance point
between lubrication and the formation of water menisci then occurs at
the low-water-content peak point. Additional water results in more
menisci, causing an increase in effective stress and a decrease in dry
density because less particle interference is required to resist the applied
pressure. When all the possible menisci have developed, the minimum
point between the two compaction peaks is reached. Olson then reasoned
that additional water reduces the pressure differential across the menisci,
at which point, the effective stress considerations should begin to apply.
With only limited data available, Olson proposed that the double peak
curve could only form in soils containing a dominant percentage of plate-
shaped collodal particles. Additional research in this area included work
of Lee and Suedkamp [5] on characteristics of irregularly shaped com-
paction curves. They investigated 34 different soils possessing a wide
range of characteristics and identified the compaction curve for each. By
mixing different portions of commercially available soils, they were able
to obtain a large variety of soil characteristics in their specimens. The
compaction curve for each specimen was then produced by ASTM Tests
for Moisture-Density Relations of Soils, Using 5.5-1b Rammer and 12-in.
Drop (D 698-70). They found that specimens with a liquid limit between
30 and 70 usually yielded the typical single peak compaction curve. Speci-
mens with a liquid limit of less than 30 and greater than 70 usually pro-
duced irregularly shaped curves. There are only a few exceptions to this
rule which was probably caused by the mineral constituents of the specific
specimens. The classification breakdown is shown in Fig. 3. Olson's
hypothesis is logically appealing; hence, the first objective of this investi-
gation was to examine the influence of negative pore pressure on the
irregularly shaped compaction curve by using a surface tension reducing
agent, together with water.
It has long been suspected that there is a difference on moisture-
density curves between values obtained by reusing the same portion of
soil repeatedly and values obtained by using a new batch of soil for each
point on the compaction curve. Concerning this viewpoint, Nelson and
Sowers [8] concluded from a series of tests that the single peak compac-
tion curve produced by reusing the same specimen of soil appears to have
a slightly greater maximum dry density than the single peak compaction
curve produced by using separate batches of soil for each test. It should
be noted that their investigations were limited to examination of the single
peak compaction curve. Therefore, an investigation of the characteristics
of irregularly shaped compaction curves was deemed desirable.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
LEE ON IRREGULAR COMPACTION CURVES 281
16
I I I I I I I .~
UPPER REGION OF / -I
14 _
12 _
10
m REGION OF TYPICAL
SINGLE PEAK CURVES / O
- i/4o -
~ow~o,o~o~ ,V ! o~
-~'~ ~y'~ ~it 0
I zq~o _
V
/ / ~IZ?~ i [] O,R~GU,.,T
~~-
/ 9 u~ ~ n~PiCAL -
V , J ,'1 i i t i
0 2 4 6 8 l0 12 14 16
~/ LIQUID LIMIT
Laboratory Investigation
Soil Specimens
To adequately investigate the influence of the soil preparation on the
irregularly shaped curves, it was necessary to compare several discrete
types of curves. For this reason, a particular selection of soil specimens
was necessary in order to include soils with a wide variance of character-
istics, especially in compaction curves. The approximate compaction
curves were needed as a starting point; therefore, full use was made of
the paper but Lee and Suedkamp on irregularly shaped curves. Noting
their classification scheme of soils according to compaction curve charac-
teristics, and knowing that the compaction curve for each soil had been
identified, it was possible to make a good selection of appropriate soils
for investigation. A few of these were soils found in nature, while
others were laboratory combinations of kaolinite, montmorillonite, illite,
quartz, and felspar, so that the percentages of each mineral could be
known. Selection of minerals provided a good analogy to natural soils
and provided maximum information about the constitution of the soil
specimens. Several specimens were selected, both natural and combined,
for this investigation, and their composition is given in Table 1.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
282 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
Montmoril-
Specimen lonite, b Illinite, c Kaolinite, d Liquid Plasticity
No. Sand, a % % % Limit Index
1 100 0 0 0 0 NP
2 75 0 0 25 13 NP
3 0 0 100 0 51 21
4 75 0 25 0 17 NP
5 25 50 25 0 172 142
6 Pierre shale (natural soil) 110 66
7 Pierre bentonite (natural soil) 310 244
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
LEE O N I R R E G U L A R COMPACTION CURVES 283
surface tension causes water menisci to form and they act as a bond
between the soil particles. This tends to cause more interparticle friction
and a lower dry density, thus causing the depression noted between the
two peaks in the double peak compaction curve. However, if Aerosol-AY,
a commercial surface tension reducing agent, is introduced in the water,
the shape of the double peak curve should be altered. This was found to
be the case.
Aerosol-AY was introduced into the water, causing a 55 percent reduc-
tion in surface tension and notable changes in the shapes of the double
peak compaction curves (Figs. 4-7). In each test, the double-peak curve
was replaced by a single peak compaction curve or one closely resembling
it. Since capillary pressure is directly related to surface tension, the
results of these tests verify the fact that pore pressure, or negative pore
pressure caused by surface tension, is the dominant factor in the formula-
tion of the double-peak compaction curve.
l-] - A E R O S O L TREATED
O - STANDARD TEST
130 m
I25 m
~z
rr
120
Z
115
I I I I I i
5 10 i5
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
284 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
[] - A E R O S O L TREATED
O- STANDARD TEST
t2S
120
A o
u~
~ [15 []
z
110
S l0 lS
O - STANDARD TEST
85 L
~0
A
Q
75
70 m
I I I I I I
10 20 30 40 50 60
MOISTURE CONTENT, PER C E N T
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
LEE ON IRREGULAR COMPACTION CURVES 285
- AEROSOL TREATED
O - STANDARD TEST
85
80
75
73
I I I,, I I
10 20 30 40 50 60
MOISTURE CONTENT, PER C E N T
paction tests, reused specimens usually gave results different from that of
new specimens.
For the cohesive soils (Figs. 8,9), the significant differences in the shape
of compaction curves between the new and reused specimens are located
on the zone of low-water content. The results of liquid-limit and plastic-
limit tests reveal approximately the same values in new and reused speci-
mens, except that the liquid limit of Specimen 5 was found to be slightly
greater for the reused specimen than the new one. As indicated in Table 1,
these new specimens were combinations of known minerals obtained from
commercial sources. These commercial soil minerals were very uniform
products. According to the results of sieve analysis, however, the grain-
size distribution of new specimens appeared to be much more uniform,
containing many more fine particles than the reused specimens. As
Michaels [9] has pointed up, dried and pulverized clay consists of packets
of many tightly bonded clay particles. The packets do not tend to stick
to each other, and the dry soil lacks cohesion, behaving more like
granular particles. If this theory is true, the higher density of reused
clay at lower water contents is predominantly due to the reduction of
the shear strength caused by the decrease of cohesion between the soil
particles and the nonuniform grain-size distribution. In addition, air-dried
cohesive soil, having been exposed to the air for a long time, usually
retains a small portion of water which is distributed evenly around the
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
286 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
STANDARD TEST
105 TEMPERATURE - 80 ~
" - - ~ ' ~ A [] - NEW SPECIMEN
~ J
SPECIMEN
100
95
Z
90
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
M O I S T U R E CONTENT, PERCENT
FIG. 8--Shape ofcompaction curves for test using new specimen compared with test
reusing the soil, Specimen 5.
STANDARD TEST
TEMPERATURE - 80 ~
~] - N E W SPECIMEN
110
O - REUSED SPECIMEN
tO0
C3
90
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
MOISTURE CONTENT, PERCENT
FIG. 9--Shape o f compaction curves for test using new specimen compared with test
reusing the soil, Specimen 3.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
LEE ON IRREGULAR COMPACTION CURVES 287
soil particles. It seems difficult for the new specimen, on the other hand,
to have an even distribution of water if mixed with a small amount of
water. The intraparticle lubrication effect, therefore, is greater in the
reused specimen corresponding to a higher dry density. As more water
is added, the effects of packets tend to disappear, and both specimens
should have a more even distribution of water content. As a result, the
dry density attains the same normal value.
In pure sand, shown in Fig. 10, the reused specimen appeared to have
a higher dry density in the portion between the zero water content and
STANDARD TEST
TEMPERATURE - 80~
[] - NE~V SPECIMEN
110
O - REUSED SPECIMEN
] 00
v~
z 95
90
I I .,, I I I t
1S
5 10
MOISTURE CONTENT, PERCENT
FIG. lO--Shape o f compaction curves f o r test using n e w specimen compared with test
reusing the soil.
Conclusions
On the basis o f this series of laboratory tests, the following conclusions
are suggested:
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
288 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
Ackno wledgment
The financial support provided by the National Science Foundation is
gratefully acknowledged.
References
[1] Proctor, R. R. in Engineering New Record, McGraw-Hill, New York, Vol. III, 1933,
p. 245.
[2l Hogentogler, C. A. in Proceedings, Highway Research Board, National Research
Council, 1936, pp. 309-316.
[3] Lambe, T. W., Transactions, American Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 125, 1960,
pp. 682-706.
[4 ] Olson, T. E., Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Division, Proceedings, Ameri-
can Sodety of Civil Engineers, Vol. 89, No. SM2, 1963, pp. 27-45.
[5] Lee, P. Y. and Suedkamp, R. J., "Characteristics of Irregularly Shaped Compaction
Curves," Highway Research Record 381, 1972, pp. 1-9.
[6] Lee, P. Y. and Hsu, D. C., "Temperature Effect on Irregularly Shaped Compaction
Curves of Soils," Highway Research Record 438, 1973, pp. 16-20.
[7] Johnson, A. W. and Sallberg, J. R., "Factors Influencing Compaction Test Results,"
Bulletin No. 319, Highway Research Board, National Research Council, 1962, pp. 1-146.
[8] Nelson, G. H. and Sowers, G. F., "Effect of Re-using Soil on Moisture-Density
Curves," Proceedings, No. 29, Highway Research Board, 1949, pp. 482--487.
[9] Michaels, A. S., Discussion of "Physico-t3aemical Properties of Soils: Soil-Water
System," by I. Th. Rosenqvist, Proceedings, Paper 2010, American Society of Civil
Engineers, April 1959.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
J. E. Gillott'
KEY WORDS: soils, rocks, microscopy, water replacement, freeze drying, ion beams
ion bombardment
289
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed
Copyright9 1976 by by ASTM International www.astm.org
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
290 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized
GILLO'I-I" ON SPECIMEN PREPARATION IN MICROSCOPY 291
image-forming electrons originate near the surface. When there are thin,
platy, or elongate particles projecting into voids or above the surface of
the specimen, the image formed at low kilovoltage reveals greater surface
detail. At higher kilovoltage, electrons which form the image may originate
from both surfaces of platy minerals if the primary beam passes through
the thin particle (Fig. la and b).
Most soils deform more readily than rocks at low stress levels and dilate
when unloaded. Relief of pressure may be accompanied also by exsolution
of gas from pore liquids. Such changes may distort the fabric, and the
collection of specimens for fabric study should be carried out so as to
reduce these effects to a minimum. Even though special core samplers are
used, it is still probable that they sometimes cause fabric damage, particu-
larly near the edges. Bulk specimens are more satisfactory, but collection
is not always possible. The field orientation should be recorded, and the
specimen coated or packaged to prevent drying.
Microscopic Methods
The polarizing microscope is the standard version of the light (optical)
microscope used for examination of materials such as rocks and soils. By
about 1880, inherent limitations of glass lenses, which gave rise to chromatic
aberration, spherical aberration, coma, astigmatism, distortion, etc., had
been corrected almost completely, and, by 1931, when the electron micro-
scope was invented, the optical microscope was not very inferior to the
modem instrument. Today, as in 1931, performance of the light microscope
is limited by resolution, which prevents formation of images which show
detail in the range less than 0.2 ~an. Spacings which are smaller than
about one third the wavelength of the wave motion do not cause diffrac-
tion. Since diffraction is involved in image formation, it follows that
detail less than about 2000 A may not be observed, even theoretically,
when light optics are used, since the wavelength range of the visible spec-
trum is 4000 to 7600 A. Practical limitations commonly make for unsatis-
factory viewing of mineralogical materials in the micrometer size range.
In practice, little more than general orientation can be deduced from clay
soil sections of standard thickness (~30/am). Many other techniques, such
as phase contrast and ultraviolet microscopy, are now available but have
received scant attention in this field, and details of the morphology of
minerals in the clay size range and fabric relations in fine grained rocks
and clay soils are obtained generally by observations on transmission or
scanning electron microscopes.
When it was realized that electrons have the properties of waves as well
as particles, and electron diffraction was established, the production of
an electron microscope became a possibility. The wavelength of the elec-
tron beam is related to the accelerating potential, and, at 60 kV, it is about
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions author
292 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
GILLOTI" ON SPECIMEN PREPARATION IN MICROSCOPY 293
The italic numbers in brackets refer to the list of references appended to this paper.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
294 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
VISIBLE
)'-RAYS X-RAYS ULTRAVIOLET INFRARED MICROWAVES RADIO
/ELECTROMAGNETIC
I I I I I I ------ L, SPECTRUM
I0-10 I0-8 I0- 6 I0" 4 I0-2 I WAVELENGTH
(METRES)
(1~) (I/J.m)
[_ ELECTRON I " OPTICAL i~ UNAIDED ~ ( LIMIT OF
MICROSCOPE MICROSCOPE EYE L RESOLUTION
S~)IL CLASSIFICATION
CLAY SILT SAND GRAVEL
--- I 1 I M. I . T .
2/J.m 60Fro 2 rnm
FIG. 2--Resolving power relative to soil particle size range and wavelength of electro-
magnetic spectrum.
ELECTRON BEAM
SCANNING T P,ANSMISSION
used similarly, but, in soil engineering, this term also implies consider-
ation of the bond between the particles and their interactions in the soil-
water system, as well as fabric relations. Optical and electron microscopes
have been the instruments used most commonly in fabric investigations,
though X-ray diffraction and radiography have been employed also. In
some studies, more than one technique has been used to analyze the fabric
of similar specimens [2 ]. Fabric has also been analyzed by measurement
of sound propagation [3 ], thermal conductivity [4], and dielectric proper-
ties [5 ]. In these cases, the anisotropic or isotropic nature of the specimen,
with respect to the physical property measured, reveals indirectly the
presence or absence of preferred orientation among the mineral particles.
Specimen preparation techniques differ, depending on the method of
fabric analysis, but moisture removal or replacement from poorly lithified
materials and exposure of the surface for examination present problems
common to most microscopic methods of fabric study.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
GILLOTT ON SPECIMEN PREPARATION IN MICROSCOPY 295
Drying
Air Drying--Spedmens may be air dried if shrinkage on drying is not
regarded as detrimental to the fabric information to be obtained. It is evi-
dent that drying shrinkage will effect the greatest changes in fabric when
the specimen is weak and the environment in which it is found is not sub-
ject to wetting and drying cycles. For example, air-dried sensitive soils
often show a relatively dense fabric when compared with the more open
fabric of the same area when the specimen is frozen on a cold stage (Fig.
1c and d). Displacement of minerals is also readily apparent if. a com-
parison is made between these two photographs; this is not to imply that
the frozen soil is undisturbed, since freezing is accompanied by volume
change, which may well cause fabric disturbance.
Replacement of the water (surface tension 72.75 x 10- 3 N/m at 20~
by another more volatile liquid, such as ethyl alcohol (22.75 x 10 -3 N/m)
or acetone (23.70 x 10-3 N/m), should reduce drying shrinkage. As
with other replacement techniques, fabric damage due to fluid migration
is a possibility.
Freeze DryingmFreeze drying reduces shrinkage and distortion of the
specimen because ice is removed by sublimation. The surface energy of
the solid-vapor interface is commonly higher than that of the liquid-vapor
interface, but no meniscus forms in pores and capillary spaces. Since ice is
much less mobile than liquid water, fluid migration into finer pores is
largely prevented as moisture is removed. The method, however, has cer-
tain drawbacks.
When the specimen is frozen, the conversion of liquid water to ice one
in larger void spaces will be accompanied by an increase in specific vol-
ume of about 9 percent. So specimen dilation at the outset may induce
fabric change.
Moisture movements within the specimen, on freezing, have been at-
tributed to at least three causes. First, the unfrozen solutions will become
more concentrated, and differences in concentration may arise because ice
already formed will be composed of fresh water. So moisture will migrate
to reestablish equilibrium in solution concentration and also to feed grow-
ing ice crystals. Vapor pressure gradients are thought to be another cause
of moisture movements. Water held close to surfaces remains unfrozen
because its freezing point is depressed. As it is metastable, however, its
vapor pressure is high, relative to that of ice elsewhere in the system. So
desorption takes place, and the water migrates towards the ice in response
to the gradient [6, 7].
Fabric changes have also been attributed to the tendency of crystals to
expel impurities to grain boundaries [8] and to grain growth of ice crystals
during freezing [9, 10]. Small crystals are probably less damaging in these
regards, so the use of ice nucleators, such as amino acids [11], and clathrate
hydrate formers, such as chloroform and ether [12], should be considered.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
296 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
GILLO'I-I" ON SPECIMEN PREPARATION IN MICROSCOPY 297
FIG. 4--Scanning electron and optical micrographs showing effects of specimen pre-
treatment.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
298 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
Surface Exposure
Surface exposure requires care in the preparation of specimens for
either scanning electron microscopy or transmission electron microscopy.
Cutting should not be used generally, since it is a shearing action which
may orient platy or elongate minerals, though it may be possible to
reduce or overcome this problem by impregnation. Specimens which are
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
GILLOTT ON SPECIMEN PREPARATION IN MICROSCOPY 299
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
300 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
clay minerals are too thin ( •50 A), contrast becomes inadequate for the
clear observation of detail; shadow casting generally solves this problem.
Disaggregation is carried out in water by hand grinding, by use of a
homogenizer, ultrasonic vibrator, or other methods. The simplest pro-
cedure is to allow a drop of the suspension to evaporate on the specimen
grid, which has been previously coated with a support film. This tech-
nique often gives unsatisfactory results because the particles agglomerate
during drying, though this tendency can be reduced by use of a dispersing
agent. As with bulk clays, droplets containing suspended clay may be
freeze dried or dried by the critical point method. The droplet is usually
placed on a support grid, prior to freezing and drying. Association of
smectites freeze dried from droplet suspension has been described [9,23],
and marked differences in fabric underline heavily the importance of
specimen preparation (Fig. 4a, b, and c).
Various methods of spray drying have been employed also. An atomi-
zer or nebulizer is used to produce a mist of clay particles in water
droplets, which are collected on the support grid. The suspension placed
in the nebulizer may contain a dispersing agent, or the solution may be
designed to gel during drying to prevent reaggregation of the clay
minerals [24]. Other modifications have included use of an electrostatic
precipitator [25] and paper extraction thimble [26] to improve the ef-
ficiency with which the clay is recovered. The mist may be dried by
passing it down an electrically heated tube.
Another technique is to disaggregate the specimen in amyl acetate and
make a smear between two glass slides. When dry, this may be shadowed
and backed by collodion or evaporated carbon before being floated off
on distilled water, scooped up, and placed on the specimen grid. Electro-
deposition [27] and replica techniques for study of dispersions have been
employed also. Particle shape and size distribution information can, of
course, be obtained from bulk specimens, and this method has some
advantages, since disaggregation is sometimes accompanied by breakup of
particles, so that shape and size distribution are affected.
Ion Bombardment
Etch techniques have increased the information obtained by micro-
scopic examination of rocks, metals, and other materials, but have been
little used in the study of soils because, until recently, there were no dry
techniques available. It has been known for over a hundred years that ion
bombardment of solid surfaces is accompanied by physical and chemical
interactions (Fig. 5). The ejection of atoms from the solid is termed
sputtering and is thought to result from a transfer of momentum, due
to a series of collisions between the incoming ion and the atoms of the
target. Recently, the effect has been used as a means of etching. The
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
GILLOTT ON SPECIMEN PREPARATION IN MICROSCOPY 301
ION BOMBARDMENT
(~ //1~~
ION IMPLANTS - - ~ t ~ S p ECi M EN " ~ HEAT
,
ARTIFACTS
I
ETCH PATTERN
,
SPUTTERCOATING
DUETO LOW YIELD DUE TO GRAINBOUNDARIES, METAL DEPOSITED
COMPONENTS,CONTAMINATION,COMPOSITIONDIFFERENCES, FROM NUMEROUS
DEFECTS, ETC. CRYSTALORIENTATION-SELECTIVE DIRECTIONSAND
EROSIONOF DENSEATOMICPLANES IMPLANTED
FIG. 5--Results and uses of ion bombardment.
rate at which the surface is eroded depends upon the nature of the solid,
the crystal orientation, and structure, and on the energy, angle of inci-
dence, and nature of the incident ions. Various methods have been used
to neutralize the positive charge which builds up on the surface of in-
sulators. These have included an electron beam [28], a Langmuir probe
[29], and imposition of a high frequency field [30]. Much recent work
has been stimulated by interest in ion pumping, surface reactions, the
nature of interatomic forces, ion implantation of semiconductors, and
film preparation in microelectronic circuitry. There are extensive reviews
of the principles [31-34].
Ceramics, fibers, biological materials, and metals have been sputter
etched, and thin foils for observation on the transmission electron
microscope have been prepared by this technique. Limitations arise
because of differences in the rate at which the surface is eroded, so
that artifacts results. Conical shapes are often produced, due to the
presence of variable yield components and to effects of original topog-
raphy which determine the local angle of incidence of the ion beam and
so influence rate of sputtering. Such problems are reduced by rotation of
the specimen.
The effects of topography may also be reduced by polishing rocks
before they are etched. In some limestones, grain boundaries between
dolomite (rhombic crystals ~30 /am) and matrix (calcite as irregular
crystals r~2 to 10 gin and clay) were etched selectively, and circular pits
were visible in the polished surface after bombardment with argon ions
in a r-f field. As a method of revealing fabric detail, the overall result
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
302 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
GILLOTT ON SPECIMEN PREPARATION IN MICROSCOPY 303
APPARATUS
Ii' L INDICATOR
HEAVY META "~'~"~ dl
SHADOWING- [ ~ " ~ ~ CARBONREPLICA
"~SAMPLE
|
| I I
REPLICATION WITH
I I I (~) EVAPORATED CARBON
(~) REPLICATION WITH POST-SHADOWING) ~. l !
EVAPORATED CARBON WITH H E A V Y / ~ ~. ~ ,~
PRE-SRADOWING/; ,~ METAL / ~ ~ ~ r CARBON
W,TH HEAVY J'~ ~ -~. ~ REPLICA
METAL J ~/ ~ ~~ ~~ ' ~ ~ CARBON
REPLICA
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions autho
304 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
APPARATUS
~ ~ PLANETARY ROTATION
OF SAMPLES
EVACUATED CHAMBER
EVAPORATED METAL
COATING
the higher energies with which the sputtered atoms reach the specimen,
where they form a better bond to the surface being coated. Another
factor is thought to arise from the relatively poor vacuum in the system.
This leads to collisions between the gas and metal atoms being deposited,
which consequently arrive at the specimen from numerous angles so
surfaces not directly in line of sight with the source receive a metal
coating.
Discussion
It is now accepted widely that constituents in the micrometre and sub-
micrometre size range and crystal imperfections play an important and
often decisive role in the engineering behavior of soils and rocks. The
detail accessible to microscopic observation has been extended almost
to the angstrom range. Attachments available to existing microscopes
have made them almost as much a miniature laboratory as an instrument
for observing fine detail. There is every indication that this trend will
continue. If the information is to be meaningful, the specimen must be
representative, and specimen preparation must introduce as few artifacts
as possible.
The scanning electron microscope makes it possible to resolve detail
well beyond that accessible to observation by means of the optical micro-
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
GILLOTT ON SPECIMEN PREPARATION IN MICROSCOPY 305
scope; its introduction has also simplified specimen preparation for robust
specimens. The preparation of fragile soils and sediments is, however,
still relatively complex, though the problems are well understood. All
present techniques have limitations, but procedures most likely to give
satisfactory results are established.
It is best to examine specimens for fabric analysis on both the optical
and electron microscopes. The optical instrument often gives an overview
of general fabric relations, and the presence of such features as preferred
orientation are generally more easy to detect than on the electron micro-
scope. Relative disposition of minerals, contact relations, authigenic
crystal growth, morphology of minerals, and surface texture of sediment
grains are observed best on the electron microscope.
The preparation of optical thin sections is a well established technique
and is normally no problem, unless weak soils or sediments are to be
sectioned. Moisture removal or replacement and impregnation are then
required. Specimens for observation on the electron microscope have to
be dried. In fabric studies of soils not thought to have dried in nature,
this is accomplished best by the critical point method or by freeze drying;
freeze etching is desirable. It is probable that ice~glass forms only very
close to the surface of soils, even when cooling is ultrarapid. A fracture
most probably passes through parts of a frozen specimen where there is
crystalline ice; so, it is improbable that the surface exposed by freeze
fracture ever contained ice glass. For this reason, a procedure such as ion
beam etching should make it possible to improve specimen preparation
technique. Observation on the scanning electron microscope of the corner
of a rectangular specimen discloses fabric relations on three orthogonal
surfaces. Ice glass could be formed close to the three surfaces of such a
specimen and dried by freeze etching. A specimen of soil is readily cut
to this shape, but the surfaces would not be representative because of
the disturbance of the minerals caused by the shearing action of cutting.
If the disturbed layer can be removed by ion bombardment or other etch
technique and without production of new artifacts, three representative
surfaces of a specimen, which has been dried under very favorable
conditions, could be viewed.
When the higher resolution of the transmission electron microscope
is required, replica techniques offer a more convenient procedure than
ultrathin sectioning (Fig. 8). Specimen preparation for analysis of particle
shape or size, or single crystal electron diffraction, may be carried out
by one of the numerous techniques of dispersion (Fig. 9).
Conclusions
The preparation of robust specimens for microscopic examination
presents few problems generally and may be carried out by routine pro-
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
306 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
SAMPLE
I
TEM
'
ULTRA THIN SECTION
I
TEM
SAMPLE
I
DISPERSE
I
DRY
I
OPTICAL
J i
METALIZE
I
MICROSCOPE I I I
SEM REPLICA TEM
I
TEM
SEM" SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPE
TEM: TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPE
Acknowledgments
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
GILLOTT ON SPECIMEN PREPARATION IN MICROSCOPY 307
References
[1] MacDonald, N. C., Marcus, H. L., and Palmburg, P. W., Proceedings, O. Johari,
Ed., 3rd Annual Scanning Electron Microscopy Symposium, liT Research Institute,
Chicago, Ill., 1970, p. 25.
[2] Gillott, J. E., Journal o f Engineering Geology, Vol. 4, No. 2, April 1970, pp. 133-153.
[3] Kaarsberg, E. A., Journal of Geology, Vol. 67, No. 4, 1959, pp. 447-472.
[4] Penner, E. in International Clay Conference, Vol. 1, I. T. Rosenquist and P. Graft-
Peterson, Eds., Pergamon, London, 1963, pp. 365-376.
[5] Winkelmolen, A. M., American Association Petroleum Geol~,ists Bulletin, Vol. 56,
No. 11, 1972, pp. 2150-2159.
[6] Weiser, C. J., Science, Vol. 169, 1970, pp. 1269-1278.
[7] Litvan, G. G., Cryobiology, Vol. 9, 1972, pp. 182-191.
[8] Lincoln, J. and Tettenhorst, R., Clays and Clay Minerals, Vol. 19, 1971, pp. 103-107.
[9] Hoffman, U., Scharrer, E., Czerch, W., Friihauf, K., and Burck, W., Berichte der
Deutscher Keramischen Gesellschaft, Vol. 39, 1962, pp. 125-130.
[10] Borst, R. L., Journal o f Petroleum Technology, Oct. 1971, pp. 1193-1201.
[11] Garten, V. A. and Head, R. B., Nature, Vol. 205, No. 4967, 1965, pp. 160-162.
[12] Tracey, M. V., Proceedings, Royal Society, Vol. 171, 1968, pp. 59-65.
[13] Meryman, H. T. and Kafig, E., "The Study of Frozen Specimens, Ice Crystals and
Ice Crystal Growth by Electron Microscopy," Research Report NM 000 018.01.09,
Naval Medical Research Institute, Bethesda, Md., 1955, pp. 529-544.
[14] Anderson, T. F., Proceedings, 2nd International Conference on Electron Microscopy,
1950, pp. 567-576.
[15] Horridge, G. A. and Tamm, S. L., Science, Vol. 163, 1969, pp. 817-818.
[16] Gillott, J. E., Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, Vol. 39, No. 1, 1969, pp. 90-105.
[17] Gillott, J. E., Clay in Engineering Geology, Elsevier, New York, 1968, pp. 296.
[18] Sides, G. and Barden, L., Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 8, 1971, pp. 392-399.
[19] Zapffe, C. A., Worden, C. O., and Zapffe, C., American Mineralogist, Vol. 36, 1951,
pp. 202-232.
[20] Mitchell, J. K., Proceedings, Highway Research Board, Vol. 35, 1956, pp. 693-713.
[21] Quigley, R. M. and Thompson, C. D., Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. III, 1966,
pp. 61-73.
[22] Gillott, J. E., Clays and Clay Minerals, Vol. 22, 1974, pp. 199-200.
[23] Bates, T. F., "Selected Electron Micrographs of Clays," Circular No. 51, College of
Mineral Industries, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pa.
[24] Schofield, F., British Journal o f Applied Physics, Vol. 2, 1951, pp. 18-19.
[25] Jonas, E. C. and Kuykendall, J. R., Clay Minerals, Vol. 6, 1966, pp. 232-235.
[26] Hughes, R. and Bohor, B., American Mineralogist, Vol. 55, Sept.-Oct. 1970, pp. 1780-
1786.
[27] Mering, J., Oberlin, A., and Villiere, J., Bulletin Societie Francaise Mineralogie et
Cristallographie, Vol. 79, 1956, pp. 515-522.
[28] Akishin, A. I., Vasil'ev, S. S., and Isaev, L. N., Bulletin o f the Academy of Sciences
o f the U.S.S.R., Physical Series, Vol. 26, 1963, p. 1379.
[29] Jorgenson, G. V. and Wehner, G. K., Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 36, 1965,
p. 2672.
[30] Anderson, G. S., Mayer, W. N., and Wehner, G. K., Journal of Applied Physics,
Vol. 33, 1962, p. 2991.
[31] Tsong, I. S. T. and Barber, D. J., Journal o f Materials Science, Vol. 8, 1973, pp. 123-
135.
[32] Holland, L. and Priestland, C. R. D., Vacuum, Vol. 22, No. 4, 1972, pp. 133-141.
[33] Carter, G. and Colligon, J. S. in Ion Bombardment o f Solids, Heinemann, London,
1968, p. 446.
[34] Davidse, P. D., Vacuum, Vol. 17, No. 3, 1966, pp. 139-145.
[35] Comer, J. J. and Turley, J. W., Journal o f Applied Physics, Vol. 26, 1955, pp. 346-
350.
[36] Techniques for Electron Microscopy, Kay, D., Ed., BlackweU, Oxford, 1965.
[37] The Electron-Optical Investigation of Clays, Mineralogical Society, Gard, J. A., Ed.,
London, 1971.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
A . L Johnson' a n d R. P. M o s t o n 2
ABSTRACT: A method for faster and more nearly complete dispersion of soil
samples for particle size analysis now appears feasible. Using agitation by ultra-
sonic energy, disaggregation and dispersion appeared to be as thorough in 10 min
as by mechanical preparation through a sieve with 0.0625-mm openings. The ultra-
sonic agitation appeared to cause no deleterious effect, on the primary particle
sizes. The time and effort required to obtain high quality dispersion is much less
for ultrasonic than for mechanical techniques, especially for heavy soils.
KEY WORDS: particle size, nondestructive tests, soil properties, ultrasonics, soils,
tests
A s o n e p h a s e o f r e s e a r c h o n l a n d subsidence in C a l i f o r n i a , a p p r o x i -
m a t e l y 500 u n d i s t u r b e d s a m p l e s were t a k e n f r o m d e p t h s as great as 2000
ft in t h e S a n J o a q u i n a n d S a n t a C l a r a Valley [1-3]. 3 T h e p a r t i c l e size
d i s t r i b u t i o n f o r these s a m p l e s was a n a l y z e d in the G e o l o g i c a l S u r v e y ' s
H y d r o l o g i c L a b o r a t o r y in D e n v e r , C o l o r a d o [4]. Because t h e m e c h a n i c a l
d i s a g g r e g a t i o n o f these s a m p l e s was t i m e c o n s u m i n g , u l t r a s o n i c e n e r g y
w a s s t u d i e d to f i n d a faster a n d s i m p l e r m e t h o d f o r t h e d i s a g g r e g a t i o n
a n d s u b s e q u e n t d i s p e r s i o n o f t h e f i n e - t e x t u r e d samples. This p a p e r ,
b r i e f l y describing s o m e results o f this s t u d y , shows t h a t ultrasonic e n e r g y
p r o v i d e s a m u c h faster a n d m o r e c o m p l e t e d i s a g g r e g a t i o n a n d d i s p e r s i o n
o f the f i n e - t e x t u r e d soils.
Ultrasonic Equipment
308
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed
Copyright9 1976 by by ASTM International www.astm.org
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
JOHNSON AND MOSTON ON USE OF ULTRASONIC ENERGY 309
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
310 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
JOHNSON AND MOSTON ON USE OF ULTRASONIC ENERGY 311
Testing Methods
The accuracy of any particle size analysis is dependent primarily on
the effectiveness of the disaggregation and dispersion methods used to
separate the soil sample into its fundamental particles. However, this
analysis must be done without deleterious effects to the soil particles, such
as the fracturing of any of the fundamental particles. The present study
was initiated to determine the speed and effectiveness of disaggregation
and dispersion of soil samples in water by the use of ultrasonic energy.
With the standard procedure (ASTM Particle Size Analysis of Soils
(D 422-72)) for determining particle size distribution, a soil sample is
disaggregated and dispersed by: (1) mechanical manipulation, (2) agitation
by shaking or stirring, and (3) chemical deflocculation. The mechanical
manipulation is normally done by a mortar and rubber-covered pestle--
taking as long as several hours to work a sample of suitable size down
through a sieve with 0.0625-mm openings. For the study reported in this
paper, the mechanical manipulation was followed with dispersion of the
sample by at least 8 h soaking in distilled water and 8 h agitation by
shaking in a reciprocating shaker. A chemical deflocculating agent,
sodium hexametaphosphate, was added prior to shaking to assist in
separation of the individual particles.
To evaluate characteristics of different ultrasonic equipment, a number
of 50-g samples of soil, passing through a sieve with 2-mm openings,
were obtained by splitting a large soil sample. Each 50-g sample was
placed in a 500-ml beaker containing 190 ml of water and 10 ml of
sodium hexametaphosphate and was stirred with a stirring rod. The
beaker was placed immediately in the liquid container of the ultrasonic
cleaning equipment being tested and was subjected to ultrasonic agitation
for a period of 10 to 30 min. Following the ultrasonic agitation, the
particle size distribution of the soil was determined by the standard
methods for sieve analysis and hydrometer analysis. Sample splits were
tested in a number of different ultrasonic cleaners ranging in frequency
and power, as shown in Table I.
To compare the results of the ultrasonic method of disaggregation and
dispersion with those of the more orthodox methods, particle size analyses
were made also on the same soils but prepared by the conventional
procedure of mechanical disaggregation and chemical deflocculation.
Some sample splits were also analyzed without use of deflocculent. The
mechanical disaggregation with the mortar and pestle was varied some-
what by preparing one sample split to pass through a sieve with 2.0-mm
openings (No. 10), a second sample split to pass through a sieve with
0.420-mm openings (No. 40), and a third sample split to pass through a
sieve with 0.0625-mm openings (No. 230). These sample splits were
analyzed by the ASTM standard sieve and hydrometer procedures,
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
312 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
P A R T I C L E * S I Z E DIAMETER IN ~,AILLIMETERS
Summary
The disaggregation of the silt- and clay-size particles appeared to be
essentially complete after only 10 rain of ultrasonic agitation, even though
the samples had been prepared only down to 2-mm size. Microscopic
examination of the soil suspensions demonstrated that many of the ag-
gregations of smaller particles (Fig. 4) resulting from purely mechanical
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
JOHNSON AND MOSTON ON USE OF ULTRASONIC ENERGY 313
Sonic
Disaggregation Silt Content, Clay Content," Velocity,
Treatment ~ ~ kHz
Bonny Loess
P10, mechanical 70.6 13.6 ...
P40, mechanical 73.8 12.2 ...
P230, mechanical 74.8 12.0
P10, ultrasonic, 5 min 74.1 10.1 56"
P10, ultrasonic, 10 min 72.9 12.3 56
PI0, ultrasonic, 20 rain 69.7 16.5 56
PI 0, ultrasonic, 30 min 68.0 17.6 58
PI0, ultrasonic, 15 min 71.8 13.8 55
P40, ultrasonic, 15 min 70.2 14.2 54
P230, ultrasonic, 15 min 69.4 16.4 54
Clay
P10, mechanical 20.0 79.2 ...
P40, mechanical 20.2 79.2 ...
P230, mechanical 25.6 74.2
P10, ultrasonic, 5 min 18.1 81.5 '60"
P10, ultrasonic, 10 min 16.3 83.5 6O
PI0, ultrasonic, 20 min 16.8 83.0 59
P10, ultrasonic, 30 min 18.3 81.5 60
P10, ultrasonic, 15 min 18.1 81.5 60
P40, ultrasonic, 15 min 16.3 83.5 60
P230, ultrasonic, 15 min 16.5 83.5 60
Sandy Silt
PIG mechanical 38.9 14.0 ...
P40 mechanical 41.0 14.6 ...
P230 mechanical 40.5 14.0
PI0 ultrasonic, 5 rain 41.9 12.0 60
P10 ultrasonic, 10 rain 41.0 14.0 58
P10 ultrasonic, 15 rain 41.4 14.0 60
P I 0 ultrasonic, 20 rain 40.5 14.0 60
P10 ultrasonic, 30 min 41.3 14.3 60
P10. ultrasonic, 15 rain 41.4 14.0 60
P40, ultrasonic, 15 min 41.0 14.6 62
P230, ultrasonic, 15 min 41.6 13.8 62
Very Fine Sand
PI0, mechanical 17.8 3.2
P40, mechanical 19.4 3.2
P230, mechanical 20.4 3.2
P10, ultrasonic, 5 min 16.8 3.2 56
P10, ultrasonic, 10 min 20.6 3.2 56
P10, ultrasonic, 20 min 18.0 3.2 59
PI0, ultrasonic, 30 min 19.2 3.2 59
PI0, ultrasonic, 15 min 18.8 3.2 56
P40, ultrasonic, 15 min 20.4 3.2 58
P230, ultrasonic, 15 rain 18.4 3.2 58
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
314 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
I00 I|
20 ~ Ln ~--~_
I '16 m
II
5 mln |
1
// ii
7C
b / ,
ta 60
n~
~ 5r,
~, 3G
I0
I
u
o o. o
P A R T I C L E - S I Z E D I A M E T E R IN M I L L I M E T E R S
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
JOHNSON AND MOSTON ON USE OF ULTRASONIC ENERGY 315
l-^
o r o o
c~ ~ c~ c5 c~ c~
PARTICLE-SIZE D I A M E T E R IN M I L L I M E T E R S
FIG. 3--Graphs showing effects o f ultrasonic agitation o f 15 min on loess samples pre-
pared through various sieves.
should include more study to determine if this factor is critical within the
range of agitation time.
Disaggregation by purely mechanical means and chemical defloccula-
tion, even when the sample was prepared to pass a 0.0625-mm sieve, does
not appear to be any more complete for most type soils than that done
by ultrasonic energy. Analyses of samples prepared by this method pro-
vided as much as 20 percent fewer clay-size particles than did analyses
using samples disaggregated and dispersed by ultrasonic energy. A clay
sample prepared only to 2.0-ram size provided 4.3 percent fewer clay-size
particles than obtained by the ultrasonic method (Fig. 1). Figure 2 shows
that a clay sample provided maximum clay content after 10 min disag-
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
316 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
JOHNSON AND MOSTON ON USE OF ULTRASONIC ENERGY 317
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
318 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
JOHNSON AND MOSTON ON USE OF ULTRASONIC ENERGY 319
References
[1] Poland, J. F. and Davis, G. H., Transaction, American Geophysical Union, Vol. 37,
No. 3, 1956, pp. 287-296.
[2] "Progress Report on Land Subsidence Investigations in the San Joaquin Valley,
California, Through 1957," Inter-Agency Committee on Land Subsidence in the San
Joaquin Valley, Sacramento, Calif., 1958.
[3] Poland, J. F. and Green, J. H., "Subsidence in the Santa Clara Valley, California--A
Progress Report," U.S. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 1619-C, 1962.
[4] Johnson, A. I., Moston, R. P., and Morris, D. A., "Physical and Hydrologic Properties
of Water-Bearing Deposits in Subsiding Areas in Central California," Professional
Paper 497-A, U.S. Geological Survey, 1968.
[5] Henry, G. E., Scientific American, Vol. 190, No. 9, 1954, pp. 54--63.
[6] Goldman, Richard, Ultrasonic Technology, Reinhold, New York, 1962.
[7] Rod, R. L.,Research and Engineering, Vol. 1, No. 2, Sept. 1955, pp. 18-23.
[8] Akiya, Schichiro and Okui, Seiichi, Journal, Pharmaceutical Society of Japan, Vol. 67,
1947, pp. 233-235.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
P. V. Lade' and H. Nejadi-Babadai I
KEY WORDS: Atterberg limits, clays, tests, moisture, soil mechanics, temperature,
soils, plastic properties
320
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed
Copyright 9 1976 byby ASTM International www.astm.org
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
LADE AND NEJADI-BABADAI ON MICROWAVE OVEN DRYING 321
Pheat = C X f X E2 (1)
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
322 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
decreasing water content; and the type o f clay, the clay content, and the
temperature also affect the dielectric dispersion. Due to the influence of
various factors on the dielectric constant, the effectiveness of heating with
microwaves can only be explored through practical experience.
It should be noted that only materials which are able to absorb the
microwaves, as explained previously, can be heated by the microwaves.
Metal objects reflect the microwaves, and materials such as glass, paper,
and some plastic objects let the microwaves pass through them without
affecting the molecules of which they are formed.
Microwave Oven
The microwave oven used for this investigation was purchased for
approximately $180 (March 1974). It had a rated power requirement of
0.97 k W and, like most microwave ovens, was set to operate at a fre-
quency o f 2450 M H z .
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized
LADE AND NEJADI-BABADAI ON MICROWAVE OVEN DRYING 323
temperatures in the order of 100 to 300~ cause the loss of the ability to
swell again. The loss of swelling potential is related to the complete loss
of interlayer water."
The loss of water from clays, which occurs with increasing drying
temperature, may be quite substantial and results in apparent increasing
water content [5]. As the clays are heated at increasingly high tempera-
tures, water is lost in irregular amounts and dehydration curves, typical
for each type of clay, are obtained [4].
It has often been reported that heating prior to determination of the
plasticity of a soil results in lower values of the liquid limit and the
plastic limit [5-10]. The results of tests performed by Radhakrishnan et
al [10] on black cotton soils showed that these soils became nonplastic,
and the clay-size fraction was reduced in the 500 to 700~ range. At even
higher temperatures, the soils became friable and sandy, and consistency
limit tests could not be performed.
The effect of partial or complete dehydration on the subsequent swell-
ing of clay soils, when mixed with water, has also been studied to some
extent [4,10--12]. It has been found that the shrinkage limit values
generally increase with increasing preheating temperature, thus indicating
decreases in the ability of the soils to swell.
Preliminary Investigations
Preliminary investigations concerning the choice of soil container and
the uniformity of the microwave radiation within the oven were per-
formed prior to any testing of soils.
Since microwaves are unable to penetrate metal objects such as alu-
minum soil drying cans used in the conventional oven, a number of con-
tainer types were tested in the microwave oven in order to select a suitable
soil container. The criteria used for selecting a suitable soil container
were that it (1) does not impede the microwaves noticeably, (2) does not
burn or deform, and (3) does not experience any loss in weight. Experi-
ments were devised to test the ability of various types of containers to
meet these three criteria [14]. As a result of this investigation, glass
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
324 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
beakers were selected as the most suitable containers to be used for soil
drying in the microwave oven.
Although microwave ovens are designed to produce uniform radiation,
an investigation of the distribution of the microwave radiation was per-
formed. Glass beakers were filled with 100 ml o f cold water and, in turn,
placed at nine different points in the oven, and the time to reach boiling
o f the water was noted for each point. The microwave radiation was
found to be only slightly nonuniform. During all subsequent testing, the
glass beaker with soil to be heated was placed in the center of the oven.
Soils Tested
Soil types ranging from highly plastic clays to clean sand were used in
the investigation o f the applicability of the microwave oven to soil drying
and water content determinations. Some o f the characteristics o f all the
soils tested are given in Table 1. Liquid limits, plastic limits, and shrink-
age limits were determined according to the standard procedures [15,16].
A conventional forced draft oven, which was set at 105 ~ was used for
this purpose. A comprehensive range o f plasticity was covered, and all
soils tested were inorganic.
Due to the already well-documented sensitivity of clay minerals to dry-
ing temperature [4-12], the main effort was concentrated on the clay
types. Seven o f the clays were obtained in form of air-dry powder. The
two marine clays were obtained in the form o f wet specimens.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
r-
o
m
z
o
z
m
t._
CO
O'l
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
326 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions autho
LADE AND NEJADI-BABADAI ON MICROWAVE OVEN DRYING 327
200 I I I I I I I q
121.2 o-~
~
120
I'-
Z
bJ
t,'- ~ A
86., a 5 A
oZ,._) 80 zx-"--- - ' 65.3 %
609% 1
hi
o - o " -~ ~ o
4O
0 I I I I I I I
0 5 I0 15 20 25 50 55 40
DRYING TIME (rain)
FIG. l--Drying curves for lO0-g specimens of Haley clay with different initial water
contents.
be explained as follows: For the same amount of wet soil, the amount of
solid material increases with decreasing water content. Assuming that the
amount of absorbed and hydroxyl water increases with the amount of
solid material, the water available for removal by microwave heating (but
not for removal by conventional heating at 105 ~ increases with decreas-
ing water content. Therefore, the difference between water contents
determined from the two different heating processes increases with
decreasing water content.
The data presented in Table 2 indicate that drying of clayey soils in
the microwave oven corresponds to drying in a conventional oven at
temperatures higher than 105 ~ Increasing the drying temperature results
in removal of adsorbed water and some hydroxyl water. Highly plastic
clays can adsorb more water to the surfaces of the particles than low
plastic silts. The difference in water contents, as determined by micro-
wave oven and conventional oven, is therefore greater for the highly
plastic bentonites than for the low plastic L-soil.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
328 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
TABLE 2--Comparison o f water contents for lO0-g specimens with different initial
water contents dried in the microwave oven and the conventional oven.
Difference
Water Content Water Content Between
Determined Using Determined Using Water Contents,
Type of Soil Microwave Oven, % Conventional Oven, % %
70 I t 1 I I , r f
oE/ g L
/
g
~ 3o
~ 20
0 I I I L I I
0 5 I0 15 20 25 30 35 40
DRYING TIME (mi n)
FIG. 2--Drying curves for specimens o f Haley clay showing influence of amount o f soil.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
LADE AND NEJADI-BABADAI ON MICROWAVE OVEN DRYING 331
10 746.3 44.3
Black Hills bentonite 50 735.6 33.6
200 728.4 702.0 26.4
500 709.0 7.0
10 81.4 7.6
50 80.7 6.9
Dixie Bond bentonite 73.8
200 80.5 6.7
500 80.1 6.3
10 66.7 3.6
Haley clay 50 64.5 63.1 1.4
250 64.0 0.9
500 64.0 0.9
10 41.1 1.4
Grundite clay 50 40.2 39.7 0.5
200 40.0 0.3
500 40.0 0.3
10 35.4 1.7
H-soil 50 34.8 33.7 1.1
200 34.3 0.6
500 34.0 0.3
10 27.3 1.3
M-soil 50 26.9 26.0 0.9
250 26.5 0.5
500 26.4 0.4
10 27.7 1.2
L-soil 50 27.4 26.5 0.9
200 27.5 1.0
500 26.9 0.4
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
332 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
[ i I I I I I
40 o AIR-DRY SOIL
z~ SOIL HEATED IN CONVENTIONAL OVEN
a SOIL HEATED IN MICROWAVE OVEN
x 30
la.i
t:3
>.-
20
o_ io M-
o t /~ L- SOIL I l I
0 I0 20 30 40 50 60 70
LIQUID L.IMIT
F I G . 3--Plasticity chart showing reduction in plasticity after heat treatment in con-
ventional oven and microwave oven f o r soils o f low plasticity.
6O i I I E [ I I I I I
t
sO0 I o AIR-DRY SOIL //o I
BLACKHILLS A SOIL HEATED IN CONVENTIONAL / , , ~
BENTON,TE /0 OVEN ///A-, I
4oo / /- [] SOIL HEATED IN M I C R O W A V E / / I
x I / / OVEN BOND
40-
zo | / / _ ~ GRUNDITE ///- BENTONITE I
~ 3o-
Boo
I0-
0 J ~ I I I I I
0 I0 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 I O0
LIQUID LIMIT
FIG. 4--Plasticity chart showing reduction in plasticity after heat treatment in con-
ventional oven and microwave oven f o r highly plastic clays.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
LADE AND NEJADI-BABADAI ON MICROWAVE OVEN DRYING 333
The shrinkage limits were found to increase in the order A-C-M, thus
indicating a reduction in swelling potential of the soils having initially
been heated in the two ovens. Similar reductions in swelling potential have
been observed for soils which have been heated to high temperatures
[4, 10--121.
Liquid limit and plastic limit tests were performed on the two marine
days, designated NBC-1 and NBC-23. These soils were only available in
wet condition and were not predried. Half of each specimen tested was
dried in the microwave oven, and the other half was dried in the conven-
tional oven. The results of the Atterberg limit tests are listed in Table 4.
Both liquid limits and plastic limits were found to be higher for the speci-
mens dried in the microwave oven than those obtained from soil drying in
the conventional oven. These results are in agreement with the other data
described herein. Thus, it is concluded that, if the microwave oven is used
for soil drying, values of liquid and plastic limits will be determined to be
too high.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
334 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
TABLE 4--Liquid and plastic limits for marine clays determined using the
microwave oven and the conventional oven.
smallest reductions were observed for the low plastic soils. The shrinkage
limits tended to increase after preheating in the microwave oven, thus in-
dicating a reduction in swelling potential of the soils. The effects of pre-
heating a plastic soil in the microwave oven are comparable to the effects
of drying the soil in a conventional oven at high temperatures.
It may be concluded that the microwave oven can be used for quick
drying of soil, but the characteristics of plastic soils will change. Although
accurate determinations of water content may only be achieved for non-
plastic soils such as coarse silts, sands, and gravels, the error encountered
for plastic soils may be acceptable for many purposes. Thus, the micro-
wave oven may be useful for rapid determinations of approximate water
content of clay soils and for research purposes, when control specimens
show no difference in water content. However, it is not recommended to
use this oven on a routine basis until the magnitude of the possible error
has been established for the type of soil to be dried.
Acknowledgment
The writers express their appreciation to the National Science Founda-
tion which provided support for this study under Grant GK 37445. K. L.
Lee of the University of California at Los Angeles provided valuable ad-
vice for the preparation of the manuscript.
References
[1] Piischner, H., Heating with Microwaves, Centrex Publishing Co., Eindhoven, The
Netherlands, 1966.
[2] Waite, W. P., Cook, K. R., and Bryan, B. B., "Broad Spectrum Microwave Systems
for Remotely Measuring Soil Moisture Content," Publication No. 18, Water Resources
Research Center, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, 1973.
[3] Arulanandan, K., Basu, R., and Scharlin, R. J., Highway Research Record, No. 426,
1973, pp. 23-32.
[4] Grim, R. E., Applied Clay Minerology, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1962.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
LADE AND NEJADI-BABADAI ON MICROWAVE OVEN DRYING 335
[5] Lambe, T. W., "How Dry is a 'Dry' Soil?", Proceedings, Highway Research Board,
1949, pp. 491-496.
[6] Casagrande, A., Public Roads, Vol. 13, 1939, pp. 121-130.
[7] Chandrasekharan, E. C., Boominathan, S., Sadayan, E., and Narayanaswamy Setty,
K. R., Proceedings, International Conference on Effects of Temperature and Heat on
Engineering Behavior of Soils, Special Report 103, Highway Research Board, 1969,
pp. 161-172.
[8] Laguros, J. G., Proceedings, International Conference on Effects of Temperature and
Heat on Engineering Behavior of Soils, Special Report 103, Highway Research Board,
1969, pp. 186-193.
[9] Lambe, T. W., and Martin, R. T., Proceedings, Highway Research Board, Vol. 34,
1955, pp. 566-582.
[10] Radhakrishnan, N., Katti, R. K., and Hussain, M., Proceedings, Third Asian Regional
Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Vol. I, Haifa, 1967,
pp. 111-115.
[11] Aylmore, L. A. G., Quirk, J. P., and Sills, I. D., Proceedings, International Conference
on Effects of Temperature and Heat on Engineering Behavior of Soils, Special Report
103, Highway Research Board, 1969, pp. 31-38.
[12] Leonards, G. A., Foundation Engineering, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1962.
[13] Ryley, M. D., "The Use of a Microwave Oven for the Rapid Determination of Moisture
Content of Soils," Report LR 280, Road Research Laboratory, Berkshire, England,
1969.
[14] Lade, P. V., and Nejadi-Babadai, H., "Characteristics of Soil Drying by Microwave
Oven," Report No. UCLA-ENG-7476, School of Engineering and Applied Science,
University of California, Los Angeles, Oct. 1974.
[15] Lambe, T. W., Soil Testing for Engineers, Wiley, New York, 1951.
[16] "Laboratory Soils Testing," Engineer Manual EM 1110-2-1906, Office of the Chief of
Engineers, Department of the Army, Washington, D. C., 1970.
DISCUSSION
~Civil engineer and research civil engineer, respectively, Soils and Pavements Laboratory,
U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Miss. 39180.
2Gilbert, P. A., "Feasibility Study--Microwave Oven Used for Rapid Determination of
Soil Water Contents," WES MP 3-478, U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station,
Vicksburg, Miss. 39180.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
336 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
Atterberg Limits, %
Identification LL b pL c PI d Description
Long Lake clay (CH) 71 23 48 fat dark brown, alluvial soil com-
posed of silt and clay-size par-
tides of montmorillonite with
some quartz and illite; ex-
tremely sticky and plastic when
wet
Vicksburg buckshot
clay (CH) 56 22 34 similar to Long Lake clay
Vicksburg silty clay
(CH) 34 22 12 fine-grained loessial deposits.
Minus 2 fraction is about 9 per-
cent of total specimen and is
predominately montmorillonite
EABPL a gray clay
(CH) 79 26 53 inorganic gray clay from
Atchafalaya River Basin, La.
Aquagel(CH) 679 36 643 commercial bentonite drilling
mud, approximately 95 percent
montmor_illonite
Brazilian clay (CH) 96 38 58 dark red clay with mottles of
whitish clay, approximately 17
percent iron oxides, specific
gravity G, = 3.12
DeGray Dam fines
(GC) 37 14 23 clayey sandy gravel; only minus
No. 4 material tested
Reid Bedford
sand (SP) NP e NP NP fine, uniform quartz sand with
some feldspar from Mississippi
River near Vicksburz. Miss.
EABPL a peat (Pt) fibrous organic material from
Atchafalaya River Basin, La.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
TABLE 6--Summary o f water contents measured by conventional and microwave ovens and microwave
oven drying times for various soils.
I'-
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
338 SOIL SPECIMEN PREPARATION FOR LABORATORY TESTING
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized
LADE AND NEJADI-BABADAI ON MICROWAVE OVEN DRYING 339
.50
~.o ....-.o
I-
Z 40
El
O
n"
El
n
30
Z
El
I-
Z
0 2.0 L EGEN D
O
nr"
I.i.I OB R A Z I L I A N CLAY
ix V I C K S B U R G B U C K S H O T C L A Y
I0
I1~, 9 C O N V E N T I O N A L OVEN
WATER C O N T E N T
z 6
--o
4
z LEGEND
~
Z # OREIDBEDFORDS A N D
8 2 . [] REID BEDFORD S A N D
9 C O N V E N T I O N A L OVEN
WATER C O N T E N T
~ o
0 200 400 600 800 I DO0 1200 1400 1600
T I M E IN OVEN~ S
FIG. 6 - - T i m e in microwave oven versus water content o f sand.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Wed Dec 22 14:00:00 EST 2010
Downloaded/printed by
University of British Columbia Library pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.