computer aided design of
reinforced concrete
columns
subjected to biaxial
bending
An rithm is presented for the analysis of rectangular
ont enacted p ool loaas ond its or bso
Sring Tectia bo devel cae
puter program. by shifting and rotating the neutral eats
Enendel Snteniction diagram ts developed A example to
Siebuted to ilustrate the design application of the core
per programs
Th analysis and design of structural frames, columns
that are subjected to axial load and biaxial bending
are frequently encountered. Biaxial bending occurs in
corner columns, in exterior columns, and in interior
columns due to load imbalance of adjacent spans. Ad-
ditionally, bridge piers are often subjected to biaxial
bending. In such cases, as shown in Fig. 1, the ap-
plied moment about the x axis, M,, and the applied
moment about the wy axis, M,, could be represented
with an axial load, P, acting at point A such that:
(la)
a=
(ab)
S/S LS
where e, and ¢, are the eccentricities of the applied
load about the y and x axes, respectively. It is con-
venient to define the angle of eccentricity, a, as:
a = tant @
Thus, a = 0 deg and a = 90 deg correspond to un-
iaxial bending about the y and x axis respectively,
and 0 deg < a < 90 deg represents a general condi-
tion of biaxial bending.
For columns subject to uniaxial bending, the neu-
tral axis always remains parallel to the axis about
which the moment is being applied. Therefore, any
assumed location of the neutral axis will result in a
set of points (P and M) for the development of the in-
teraction diagram.
In contrast, the neutral axis will be inclined at an
angle 6, as shown in Fig, 2, for columns subjected to
biaxial bending. Thus, for a given axial load, not only
the depth of the compression zone, but the inclina-
tion of the neutral axis is unknown,
Keywords: axial loads; biaxial loads, bendin
ports); computer programs; reinforced concret
sign.
CONCRETE INTERNATIONAL/SEPTEMBER 1986
CAD
for
Columns
by Mohammad R. Ehsani
CENTROIO
ig, 1A column subjected to axtal load and biexiat bending
can be represented by ar axial load P applied at a point A.
Pig. 2—A coluran subjected to retattvely low biaxial loads
results in a triangular compresston area with an inclined
neutral axis, For uniaxial bending, the neutral axis remains
pparallet fo the axis about which the moment is being applied.
4Furthermore, for a given eross section, the inclina-
tion of the neutral axis will vary depending on the
magnitide of the applied axial load. Consequently,
the iteration procedure to determine the location and
inclination of the neutral axis for equilibrium is very
tedious and time consuming.
In order to overcome these difficulties, approxima-
tion techniques have been introduced to ealculate the
biaxial bending capacity of a section in terms of the
more readily obtained uniaxial capacities. The most
common approximation techniques are the reciprocal
load method? and the load contour method.* While
both techniques are approximate and require the
availability of the uniaxial interaction diagrams for
the cross section, the latter also requires an esti-
mated contour factor, 8. The estimation of the con-
tour factor introduces one additional degree of itera-
tion to the problem.
The above methods have served as valuable design
tools over the years. Considering the affordability
and availability of microcomputers, however, it is
time to resort to simpler methods to obtain faster and
more exact solutions to this problem.
Several computer programs are currently available
that determine the biaxial capacity of columns."
A
COMPRESSION
AREA
P-NEUTRAL AXIS
Fig. 3—There are five possible configurations for the
compressive areas of columns subjected to biaxial bending,
Aig, 4—Strain tn the reinforcing steel can be calculated for any
location and orientation ofthe neutral axis. This technique ts
also used in developing the interaction diagram,
4
However, these programs use the approximation
techniques mentioned earlier. Thus, the user has to
assume a starting value for the contour factor 8, ran
the program, then select a new contour factor until
convergence is achieved. The final solution is still an
approximate solution, and the accuracy depends on
the particular technique used
Equilibrium criteria
‘The compressive area in a rectangular column sub-
Jected to biaxial bending could be any of the five pos-
sibilities that are schematically shown in Fig. 3. ‘The
concrete compressive force, P., can be calculated as
the product of the average concrete compressive
strength, f, and the compression area, A,. Por the tri-
angular compression area of Fig. 3a, for example, this
foree is equal to 0.85 f° (ABYACV2. The magnitude
and the point of application of this compressive force
can be determined as given by Mattock.®
Fig. 2 corresponds to a column subjected to rela-
tively low axial loads, resulting in a triangular
compression area, as shown in Fig. 3(a). The resul-
tant eonerete compressive foree, P, is assumed to act
at a point (@,9,). The strain in the reinforcing steel
can be ealeulated for any assumed location and ori:
entation of the neutral axis, as shown in Fig. 4.
For an applied axial load P with eccentricities e,
and e, the force equilibrium equation can be ex-
pressed as:
P=P,+5C,- 20, @)
where Cand T,-represent the compressive and ten-
sile forces in the ith reinforeing bar respectively. The
moment equilibrium equations take the form:
Pe, = PX, + Wi Xe + BT Xq (a)
Pe, = PLY, + Wea Ye + BT, Yu (4b)
in which X, and Y, represent the # and y coordinates
of individual reinforcing bars. For a given axial load
and eceentricity, the location and orientation of the
neutral axis must be adjusted until equilibrium of Eq.
(8) and (4) is satisfied.
Program description
‘The computer program described in this paper,
BIAXIAL, is written in BASI¢ for IBM Personal Com-
puters, It is capable of producing points that de-
seribe the axial load vs. moment interaction diagram
for any short rectangular column under uniaxial or
biaxial bending. The program can only analyze sec-
tions where the reinforcing steel is placed symmetri-
cally about both axes, so that the plastic centroid and
the centroid of the concrete section coincide. Benjar
developed a different version of this program in FOR-
TRAN for VAXII computers.*
CONCRETE INTERNATIONAL/SEPTEMBER 1986Input data for BIAXIAL include: the material and
section properties, the area and coordinates of each
longitudinal bar, and the angle of eccentricity, a,
along which the axial load is applied. The output of
the program consists of a series of data points (P and
Af values) that could be used in drawing the interae-
tion diagram for the column.
‘The program assumes a linear variation of strain
over the depth of the section. Strain hardening of
steel, tensile strength of eonerete, and slenderness
effects are ignored. In addition, the output does not
include the capacity reduetion factor, #.
‘The flow chart for the program, shown in Fig. 5,
indicates the linkage hetween different subpro-
grams. The neutral axis is systematically shifted par-
allel to the axis of bending for columns subjected to
uniaxial bending. The compression area is sliced into
an even number of rectangles for each location of the
neutral axis, The conerete compression force is cal-
culated by summing the forees for all slices using
Simpson's rule, With the steel forces determined
from strain compatability, the axial load and moment
capacity of the section are calculated.
‘The development of the interaction diagram for the
biaxial bending case is demonstrated with the aid of
Fig. 4. In this figure, the axial load is applied along
line p, making an angle o with the « axis. For the
first point, it is assumed that the depth to the neu-
tral axis, AB, is 0.05% and the neutral axis is perpen-
dicular to line p, ‘The axial load P is calculated and
the equilibrium of Bq, (4) is investigated. This will in-
dicate the direction in which the neutral axis must be
rotated to achieve moment equilibrium. By holding
the length AB constant, the neutral axis is rotated 2
deg in the appropriate direction about point B and
the equilibrium equations are re-examined,
The rotation of the neutral axis will continue in the
same direction until the equilibrium equations re-
quire it to reverse. The current and the previous an-
gle will then be bisected and the procedure will con-
tinue until the exact inclination of the neutral axis,
corresponding to foree and moment equilibrium, is
achieved. The axial load, the bending capacity about
the w and y axes, and the biaxial bending capacity of
the column are calculated, The convergence to equi-
librium constitutes one set of data points for the in-
teraction diagram.
For the next point, the length AB is incremented
by 0.054 and the neutral axis is rotated about point
B, The shifting of the neutral axis continues until the
calculated axial load is equal to 80 percent of the sec-
tion capacity in pure compression. With this proce-
dure, the first few points corresponding to small val-
ues of AB usually result in negative axial loads, or
tension. The number of points in tension depends on
the cross-sectional dimensions of the column, and the
area and location of the reinforeing steel. However,
only points with positive axial loads are included in
the output.
CONCRETE INTERNATIONAL/SEPTEMBER 1986
For a given cross section, the entire family of
curves describing the failure surface can be obtained
by varying the angle of eccentricity, a, from zero to
ninety deg as shown in Fig. 6.
Summary and conclusions
Development of interaction diagrams for columns
subjected to axial compression and biaxial bending is
a tedious task because the equilibrium condition for
any axial load can only be achieved hy both transla-
tion and rotation of the neutral axis. Approximation
Ee