Re-Sort Process

If the 3rd Party Auditor fails a Final Inspection, the Inspection Document is sent to Regional QA and Production Team for review
Regional QA and Production Manager reviews Inspection Document and decides on requirement for:
- Re-sort
- CAP

If a Re-sort of product P.O. is required the attached format must be used

- Factory must check 100% of failed P.O. garments for the faults identified by the 3rd Party Auditor.
- Factory must input all defect types found by the 3rd party in the "Defect Description" column
- Factory must input all defect quantities found during 100% check by color against the defect type
- (Unrepairable + Repaired Quantity) must be equal to "Defect Quantity"
- Qty Offered for Re-inspection = (Check Qty - Total Defects) + (Repaired Qty + Replaced Qty)

If the Supplier replaces the defect quantity with "good" product from another P.O. then the quantity is noted in the "Replaced Quantity" column.
The Supplier must still sort the work and give details of Unrepairable Quantity by defect type and size.
Unrepairable quantity must be sealed in cartons by defect type (one defect type per carton with quantity clearly marked on the carton) and kept for 3rd Party Auditor to check when they
re-inspection

Re-sort Document must be submitted to QAP Manager for review/ approval 24 hours {1 working day } before scheduling inspection date .
- QA and Production Manager will challenge any figures that are not aligned with the failure rate or defect types identified by 3rd Party Auditor
- Once approved, Supplier may request a re-inspection by the 3rd Party Auditor.
- Before the re-inspection of "good" product, 3rd Party Auditor verifies "Unrepairable quantity" in cartons by randomly checking quantity in one carton. Upon Random check of the quan
would have the factopry close the carton with 3rd party sealer tapes across the carton.
- The Supplier can only open these cartons {with unrepairable peices } after the entire P.O. of the style has been shipped out.

Re -Inspection Approval Criteria

Factory would have to provide resorting details of how many garments replaced after sorting as per Above Process
QAP Manager after review Resorting data sheet , will take a call on further action if the audit need to be done on specific Failure reason per Re-inspection Criteria or would be done for
Measurement+ Packaging }.
QAP Manager while approving per specific criteria for reinspection failure reason would sign off {Column D } on the sheet and share the pdf format with 3rd Party
 Supplier: EPIC (28028166) Factory: EGMCL (28074609) PO# 9905682359 Style# GM007421/B

UN-REPAIRABLE DEFECTS
QTY OFFERED
Total SIZE BREAKDOWN REPAIRED REPLACED
PO COLOR CHECKING QTY DEFECT DESCRIPTION Total Defects Total for Re-
Defects % QTY QTY
30x29 30x30 30x32 32x29 32x30 32x32 34x29 34x30 34x32 36x29 36x30 36x32 38x29 38x30 38x32 40x29 40x30 40x32 42x29 42x30 44x29 44x30 46x29 46x30 Unrepairable INSPECTION

Foreign Yarn 134 0.68% 0 12 2 2 3 11 13 8 7 9 3 5 2 4 5 7 6 9 4 5 3 2 9 3 134 0

Broken Stitch 55 0.28% 3 2 5 2 3 4 0 0 2 5 3 5 1 3 3 2 2 4 0 2 1 1 2 0 55 0
Skip Stitch 42 0.21% 1 2 0 1 0 1 2 2 1 3 2 0 4 1 2 2 0 0 2 3 2 5 2 4 42 0
Uncut thread 248 1.26% 12 11 9 17 14 9 7 9 14 9 15 16 13 9 5 6 18 14 11 9 5 7 4 5 248 0
Loop Shading 66 0.33% 3 4 6 4 1 3 2 3 2 3 2 1 4 2 5 2 2 2 1 4 3 3 2 2 66
9905682359 Sand Khaki 19728
Spot 12 0.06% 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 4 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0
Loose thread 222 1.13% 9 4 13 9 5 9 4 7 3 7 2 13 14 12 9 14 11 5 14 9 16 14 7 12 222 0
Rawedge 8 0.04% 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0
Damage 4 0.02% 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4

GRAND TOTAL 791 4.01% 28 35 38 35 28 37 29 33 30 37 29 44 38 32 32 34 39 35 32 32 30 32 26 26 0 0 787 4 0

 New Inspection Criteria for Garment
Supplier: Factory: PO# Style#

Failure Reason/Section QAP Manager approval on

Initial FRI Level Re-Inspection Level criteria of Remark
During 1st FRI Re-inspection
Packing S-3 (S-4) 1- supplier would have to provide resorting details of how
The re-inspection is conducted at the next many garments replaced after resorting .
higher level of inspection. 2- Manager / QAP team after review Resorting data sheet and
will take a call on further action
Visual L-I (L-II) 1- supplier would have to provide resorting details of how
The re-inspection is conducted at the next many garments replaced after resorting .
higher level of inspection. 2- Manager / QAP team after review Resorting data sheet and
will take a call on further action
Measurement S-4 (L-I) 1- supplier would have to provide resorting details of how
The re-inspection is conducted at the next many garments replaced after resorting .
higher level of inspection. 2- Manager / QAP team after review Resorting data sheet and
will take a call on further action
Metal Check Fix Sample Size: 20 pcs Shipment Quantity ≤ 20,000, 1- supplier would have to provide resorting details of how
inspection quantity = 200 pcs. many garments replaced after resorting .
2- Manager / QAP team after review Resorting data sheet and
Shipment Quantity > 20,000, will take a call on further action
inspection quantity = 1%

Sweater Fix Sample Size: The re-inspection criteria will be 1. Seal the fail sample(s) if the inspection result is rated as
Weight Check 3 pcs / size / color confirmed by WGS QAP later upon the "Fail" due to "Out of Tolerance".
review of the failed sample 2. Rate the inspection results as "Pending" if no specification
is provided for comparison.

Pulling Test Fix Sample Size: 10 pcs The re-inspection criteria will be 1. Data of pulling test shall be recorded on the report for
confirmed by WGS QAP later upon the failure sample.
review of the failed sample 2.Seal 20 pcs of sample (non-test) with ITS tape for factory to
send to QAP for further verification.

Button Lockstitch Check Fix Sample Size: 10 pcs/ The re-inspection criteria will be Seal 10 pcs of sample (non-test) by ITS tape for factory to
Style confirmed by WGS QAP later upon the send to QAP for further verification.
review of the failed samples

Barcode L-I One Level up (L-II)

Readability Check