Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A320-231/V2500-A1
A320-212/CFM56-5A3
1 General................................................................................................................................ 5
1.1 Introduction.................................................................................................... 5
1.2 Colour Schemes for Airport Analyses in RPM...................................................5
1.3 Airport Analyses general assumptions............................................................5
2 Take – Off Analysis General Information.............................................................6
2.1 Airport data.................................................................................................... 6
3 Climb-Out Procedure in case of Engine Failure................................................7
3.1 General........................................................................................................... 7
3.2 “VMC PROCEDURE”.......................................................................................... 8
4 Acceleration Altitude..................................................................................................... 8
4.1 Correction to altimeter for non standard temperature ....................................8
5 Take-off Analysis........................................................................................................... 9
5.1 Assumptions Take Off.................................................................................... 9
5.2 Applicable limitations and explanations using the Take off analysis................9
5.3 Take-Off Speeds used in the Take off Analysis..............................................10
5.3.1 General............................................................................................................... 10
5.3.2 Take-Off Speed Presentation..............................................................................10
6 Take-Off Data Presentation Dry & Wet RWY....................................................11
7 Performance Limited Take-Off Mass Calculation (PTOM)..........................13
7.1 Use Of Corrections........................................................................................ 13
7.1.1 QNH Corrections................................................................................................. 13
7.1.2 Anti-ice ON Correction ......................................................................................14
7.1.3 Packs ON Correction .......................................................................................... 15
7.1.4 Take Off - Wet Runway Surface...........................................................................16
7.2 How To Find performance Limited Takeoff Mass (PTOM) ..............................16
8 Flexible Take-off Thrust........................................................................................... 18
8.1 Calculation of the flexible temperature, Tflex................................................18
8.2 Flexible Take-off requirements.....................................................................19
8.3 Procedure to follow in order to find Tflex......................................................19
8.4 Example how to find Tflex ........................................................................... 20
9 Go-Around and Approach Limit ...........................................................................21
9.1 General......................................................................................................... 21
9.2 Approach Climb ........................................................................................... 21
9.3 Assumptions Approach Go-Around Climb Gradient Table.............................22
9.4 Presentation of Approach Climb Table..........................................................22
9.4.1 How to find performance limited go-around mass..............................................22
9.4.2 Example (see § 9.4)............................................................................................ 22
1 General
1.1 Introduction
The graphic material used in this introduction is displaying pictures from the A320-231, but
the logic and use of analyses also apply to the A320-212.
The Airport Analysis charts (AA) contain information regarding take-off and landing
performance limitations for the A320-231/V2500-A1 and the A320-212/CFM56-5A3
operated by XXX. The Airport Analysis charts presented in the Route Performance Manual are
generated from data extracted from the Approved Aircraft Flight Manual.
1. The content of this manual is subject to revision service. Airport Analysis listed in the
table of contents will be revised when any parameter shown on the page is changed.
2. Temporary Airport Analysis will be issued in case of Work In Progress (WIP) or when other
changes to the airport data. In the “Notes Section” of the Airport Analysis, the validation
time of the analysis along with the appropriate “NOTAM” or “AIP supplement Number”
will be stated.
4. Airport Analysis not listed in the Table of Contents are not subject to be updated and
should be taken out and destroyed. Please note that “Temporary” Airport Analysis charts
will not be included in the “Table of Contents”.
5. If taking off or landing on airports not included in the Route Performance Manual (RPM),
the takeoff and landing mass should be determined in one of the following ways:
• Request Airport Analysis from the Operations or Flight Department. Make sure that
the data is up-to-date.
• Calculate from the Airplane Flight Manual (AFM). The information about airfield
characteristics can be obtained from the AIP. Great care must be taken, especially
when considering obstacle information.
Take-off mass higher than structural mass may be presented, this to allow for corrections
(pressure, temperature..).
1. Airport Name and Airport Identifier, ICAO/IATA codes and Runway Designator.
3. The slope is the difference in elevation between the line-up position and the runway
end, divided by the distance. This is the mean slope used for calculation.
5. Obstacle data is given as distance from start of TORA and height above the runway
end, i.e. the end of TORA. When calculating obstacle clearance, the effect of the slope
when the TOD is shorter than the TODA is considered, i.e., the lift-off point will have
another elevation than the runway end.
6. Runway alignment penalties are included. There are three different line-up methods
considered.
This assumes that the aircraft comes from a taxiway - perpendicular to the runway, a
turning area or on a runway with sufficient width to make a 90° turn onto the runway. Note
that the taxiway/Runway marking may take the aircraft too far into the runway.
Line-Up Penalty used in software TORA and TODA 10.9 Meters / ASDA 23.6 Meters.
This assumes that a back-track has been done and a full 180° turnaround is made and the
runway has no turning area or width to make a 90° line up.
Line-Up Penalty used in software TORA and TODA 16.5 Meters / ASDA 29.1 Meters.
3.1 General
The climb-out procedure following engine failure is published in the “Notes Field” in the
upper part of the Airport Analysis.
● Climb-out following Engine Failure is normally based on runway track. This Procedure is
given as “NO NOTE” and means that cleanup shall be at the standard acceleration
altitude. If in the note field there is only stipulated a certain clean up altitude, then you
are in case of engine failure expected to follow runway track and clean up at the
specified acceleration altitude.
● In some cases the Climb-out on runway track gives a TOM reduction with regard to the
obstacle clearance requirement. In such cases another climb-out procedure has been
used for the calculations in order to get less mass restrictions at Takeoff. This procedure
is given as a “SPECIAL PROCEDURE”.If there is no special procedure published in the
note field, then you are expected to climb on runway track and clean up at standard
acceleration altitude.
4 Acceleration Altitude
The Airport Analysis is based on a standard Minimum Engine Failure Flaps Retraction
Altitude (EFFRA) of 800 ft above airfield elevation in case of engine failure.
Observe that minimum all engines operating acceleration altitude is also 800ft above airfield
elevation.
For some runways a “SPECIAL PROCEDURE” with wording “Minimum acceleration altitude
---- ft MSL” is used. This means that acceleration for clean up must NOT be performed
below the given altitude in order to get required terrain clearance. The given acceleration
altitude is valid at engine failure and all engine climb-out. If no flap retraction altitude is
given, the calculation is based on 800 ft AAL.
Minimum altitudes connected with the approach procedure, decision and minimum altitudes,
altimeter bug settings (acceleration altitudes) and minimum climb-out altitudes shall be
corrected for air temperature in non standard atmosphere according to company standard
operating procedures.
5 Take-off Analysis
5.2 Applicable limitations and explanations using the Take off analysis
• The takeoff masses (in kg) on the Airport Analysis are only valid for the indicated flaps
setting (configuration). If the analysis is generated for Fixed Flap setting, then the Flap
setting will be indicated in the Configuration box.
• It is allowed to interpolate in the wind and the temperature column/row as long as all
data is for the same flaps setting.
• Performance data for 20kt headwinds must be used for headwinds greater than 20kts.
5.3.1 General
V1, VR and V2 speeds presented on the AA chart are associated with the given take-off Mass
for the respective temperature and wind conditions. The speeds are in Knot Indicated Air
Speed (KIAS). The speeds are given for the Max Structural Mass (MTOM) if the performance
limited take-off Mass is higher than the Max Structural Mass. These speeds are then
presented within brackets [ ].
V1 Decision Speed
VR Rotation speed
V2 Take-Off Safety Speed
Obstacles included
in calculation
The Presentation for WET Runway is the same as for Dry Runway except on WET analysis the
temperature scale is from 0°C to +58°C.
● The corrected PTOM depending on Field length, Obstacle, Brake Energy, Tyre speed,
Minimum Control Speed and Climb Limits.
● The Maximum Structural Take-Off Mass.
The PTOM found in the analysis for relevant conditions is based on standard QNH 1013 hPa
and for conditions as stipulated in the configuration box.
After each mass that is presented on the chart, a figure for the QNH correction is presented.
If actual QNH is above 1013 then ADD the corrections to the PTOM per hPa above 1013 hPa.
If actual QNH is below 1013 then Subtract the corrections from the PTOM per hPa below
1013 hPa.
If using the flexible temperature, Tflex method then use the QNH correction in
following way:
If actual QNH is above 1013 then Subtract the corrections to actual takeoff mass per hPa
above 1013 hPa.
If actual QNH is below 1013 then ADD the corrections to actual takeoff mass per hPa below
1013 hPa.
The Anti-ice ON corrections are tabulated with a column for each flaps setting used in the
Airport Analysis, and with three rows marked F, O and C.
Observe the correction box is calculated for each runway and is only valid for the page and
analysis it is generated for.
The limiting factor at the OAT or Tref and ambient wind decides which correction to apply to
the performance limited mass.
When finding PTOM then use the correction as indicated in the correction box to PTOM.
If using the flexible temperature, Tflex method , then use the correction with the reverse
sign to the Actual Takeoff mass.
The PACKS ON corrections are tabulated with a column for each flaps setting used in the
Airport Analysis, and with three rows marked F, O and C.
Observe the correction box is calculated for each runway and is only valid for the page and
analysis it is generated for.
The limiting factor at the OAT or Tref and ambient wind decides which correction to apply to
the performance limited mass.
When finding PTOM then use the correction as indicated in the correction box to PTOM.
If using the flexible temperature, Tflex method , then use the correction with the reverse
sign to the Actual Takeoff mass.
● Definition:
OPS 1.480 (a) (10) A runway is considered wet when the runway surface is covered with
water, or equivalent, less than 3mm depth or when there is sufficient moisture on the
runway surface to make it appear reflective, but without significant areas of standing
water.
● Use the Airport Analysis valid for “WET RUNWAY”, which is applicable to a wet
runway, which is not contaminated and not slippery (braking action “GOOD”).
● If Runway is reported “GROOVED”, then some operators can, if not company policy
states otherwise, use DRY data even if runway is reported wet.
● The table is also applicable to runways which are wholely or partially covered with
compacted snow or ice, when the reported braking action is GOOD (friction
coefficient = 0.40 or above).
● For Wet Runways, the calculation is based on an obstacle height of 15ft instead of
35ft (dry runway). In some cases, the Wet Mass could be greater than the Dry Mass, in
this case take the lower of the two masses and keep the Wet runway speeds.
● Check standard operating procedure manual and/or applicable limitations in the AFM
regarding if reduced takeoff procedure is allowed for takeoff from a WET Runway.
● No allowance is made for the drag resistance of the wheels and for the drag caused
by spray striking the airframe and landing gear.
● The calculation of performance limited takeoff mass for Operations on a Wet Runway
is the same as that presented in the Take-Off Mass Calculation as explained later in
this introduction but use analysis valid for WET Runway.
If the OAT or ambient wind component is not found in the Airport Analysis use the closest
worse condition. If necessary interpolate between closest OATs and Winds in order to get the
maximum take-off mass.
• The performance limited takeoff mass with all applicable corrections done.
• Max structural takeoff mass.
1. Select the appropriate airport analysis for Runway in use. Use the DRY or WET runway
table as required.
2. Find actual OAT.
3. Find ambient head or tailwind component.
4. Enter the Airport Analysis at the ambient wind and OAT where you will find the
Uncorrected performance limited Takeoff mass (PTOM). Get the QNH correction and
note the limit code and Flap setting.
5. Add the QNH correction in kg/hPa to PTOM if the actual QNH >1013. Subtract the QNH
correction in kg/hPa from the PTOM if the actual QNH<1013.
6. Apply corrections for Anti-ice and use of Packs if applicable. Use limit code and Flap
setting found in 4.
7. You now have the Corrected Performance Limited Takeoff Mass (CPTOM).
8. Check that the Actual Takeoff Mass is lower or equal to the corrected Performance
limited Mass.
9. Check that the Actual Takeoff Mass is lower or equal to the Max Structural Limiting Mass.
10. Select speeds valid for OAT.
11. Select thrust for OAT.
12. End of procedure.
NOTE: If the ACTUAL takeoff mass is lower than PERFORMANCE LIMITED TAKEOFF MASS,
you can use the ASSUMED TEMPERATURE method in order to achieve correct speeds but:
Dry Runway.
CONFIG 1+F.
Actual OAT +8°C.
ENGINE and WING Anti Ice ON.
PACKS ON.
Wind 0 (Calm).
Actual QNH 1003.
Flexible take-off can be used when the actual take-off mass is lower than the maximum
performance limited take-off mass for the actual temperature. Since the Performance limited
take-off mass decreases when temperature increases, it is possible to determine a
temperature at which actual mass would be limiting (flexible temperature).When this
temperature is corrected for non-standard pressure and use of Packs and Anti-ice
configuration it becomes the FLEX TEMP.
The temperature is then entered into the FADEC via the MCDU perf page in order to get the
decreased thrust.
Thrust
OAT
Flex
OAT T REF Temp TMAXFLEX
Take-off at reduced thrust is permissible only if the airplane meets all applicable
performance requirements at the planned take-off mass with the operating engine at the
thrust level available for the assumed temperature.
● Thrust may not be reduced by more than 25 % of the full rated thrust, this is achieved
by limiting flexible temperature to TMAXFLEX
● The take-off EPR cannot be lower than Max climb EPR at the same condition.
● The flexible temperature cannot be lower than the flat rating temperature, T REF or the
actual temperature (OAT).
In case of engine failure, consider the use of TOGA thrust on the remaining engine, but all
requirements will be met with the set FLEX THRUST.
9.1 General
The airplane on final approach must be able to retain the ability to perform a missed
approach if one engine fails. The airplane must be able to meet specific gross climb
gradients in case of a go-around.
The approach climb limit mass is the maximum mass that will allow the airplane to perform
in accordance with these requirements.
The mass for determining the go-around mass is based on the airport pressure altitude and
temperature at the airfield.
The airplane must be able to meet specific gross climb gradients in case of a go-around;
The 3.2% climb gradient that is required in the landing configuration is never limiting when
all engines are operating.
Approach climb limit is always more limiting than the landing climb limit. The missed
approach procedures are based on 2.5% climb gradient, according to OPS 1.510.
The table with “Approach 2.4% Go-around 2.5% ” header covers both approach and landing
climb limitations.
The Approach Climb limit is presented in a separate table on the Airport Analysis.
• Config 3.
• Analysis based on 2.5 % or higher when required.
• Temperature reference is the OAT at the airfield.
• Analysis based on Aerodrome Elevation.
• One engine inoperative.
• --- means not applicable.
• Air Condition – ON.
• Anti Ice (A/I) : OFF (-) Engine Anti-ice ON (E) Engine & Wing Anti-ice ON (W)
Configuration OAT
Performance limited
Anti-ice Go-around Mass
Configuration
This table presents performance limited gradients for various Go-around gradients when
this is required according to the procedure.
Performance limited
Go-Around Gradients
Go-around Mass
9.7 Example
10.1 General
The landing data is published at the bottom of the AA table. The maximum landing mass
limited by runway length is presented and does not observe the MLM, however the structural
limit should never be exceeded, except in the case of an emergency.
Any items affecting the landing distance that are inoperative (e.g. spoilers, Anti-skid
inoperative) should be noted and corrective action taken on penalties/ co-efficient that may
be applied.
Actual runway conditions for ETA should be considered. Slippery runway is the most
common reason for overrun at landing. The combination of slippery runway and factors such
as tailwind and high approach speed should be avoided.
Avoid combination of any failures that may affect breaking capability when landing on
contaminated runways.
The maximum landing mass is the lower mass allowed by the following requirements.
The mass given is the maximum mass advised to bring the aircraft to a complete stop, if the
threshold is crossed at 50 ft and at Vref.
From 50ft above the threshold to the point were the aircraft comes to a complete stop.
The required landing distance is the actual landing distance divided by 0.6, assuming the
surface is dry. If the surface is Wet, the required landing distance must be at least 115% of
that for a dry runway.
Wind Component
Flap Configuration
T-Tailwind H-Headwind
Configuration FULL.
Anti-skid Inoperative (I).
Wind Component T (Tailwind) 10 kt.
Wet Runway.
They are based on the worst case scenario of an engine failure during take-off (at V 1). Where
by, during take-off (with engine failure), the aircraft can be brought to a complete stop
before the end of the Stopway, or can take-off, reach V 2 at or before 15ft, and complete the
take-off avoiding all limiting obstacles.
The maximum take-off masses in the airport analysis are valid only for the indicated flap
setting in the configuration box and as indicated on top of each table.
It is allowable to interpolate between closest OAT:s to maximize take-off mass.
Extrapolation outside the range of the airport analysis is not permitted. Where actual takeoff
mass is lower than that presented in the airport analysis, take-off speeds may be obtained
from the QRH.
V1, VR and V2 are presented for each take-off mass, and are valid for that mass and
configuration only. The speeds are in indicated Air speed (KIAS).
Where both reduced braking action and contaminant is reported, use the Takeoff with
contaminant AA data.
CAUTION 1: Clearway must not be used at takeoff when any correction is applicable which
increases TOD or ASD (i.e. braking action less than good, slush, snow and water covered
runway, any wheel brake(s) u/s, etc.).
CAUTION 2: The operating rules for contaminated runways permit that following an engine
failure the airplane may clear close-in obstacles by only 15 feet. Therefore, when taking off
on contaminated runways, special care should be taken regarding obstacle clearance,
especially if the takeoff is obstacle limited and the number of obstacles in the area
surrounding the airport is high.
11.1 Assumptions Takeoff Standing water, Slush, Wet Snow / Dry Snow
The data presented in the Standing Water, Slush, Wet snow and Dry Snow airport analysis, is
based on reasonable estimates of the runway surface condition, effects on the accelerating
and braking phases. The presented analysis is based on:
11.2 Presentation Takeoff Standing water, Slush, Wet Snow / Dry Snow
12.1 General
Takeoff – Slippery runway data is to be used where the reported braking coefficient is less
than 0.40, and the runway is not considered contaminated per the definition. Where reduced
braking action is evident, crews will be notified via SNOWTAMS.
The Accelerate-Stop Distance is adjusted for reduced braking action. This will yield an
unbalanced takeoff, with an unbalanced V 1. The calculation covers both continued takeoff
and abandoned takeoff and stop when engine failure is recognised at V 1.
1 separate table is presented for Takeoff Slippery Runway based on the worst case scenario
of an engine failure during take-off (at V 1). Where by, during take-off (with engine failure),
the aircraft can be brought to a complete stop before the end of the Stopway, or can take-
off, reach V2 at or before 15ft, and complete the take-off avoiding all limiting obstacles.
The maximum take-off masses in the airport analysis are valid only for the indicated flap
setting in the configuration box and as indicated on top of the table.
It is allowable to interpolate between closest winds and temperatures, however extrapolation
outside the range of the airport analysis is not permitted.
Extrapolation outside the range of the airport analysis is not permitted. Where actual takeoff
mass is lower than that presented in the airport analysis, take-off speeds may be obtained
from the QRH.
V1, VR and V2 are presented for each take-off mass, and are valid for that mass and
configuration only. The speeds are in indicated Air speed (KIAS).
Where both reduced braking action and contamination is reported, use the Takeoff with
contaminant AA data.
Subtract the QNH correction in kg/hPa from the PTOM if actual QNH < 1013.
Add the QNH correction in kg/hPa to the PTOM if actual QNH >1013.
13.1 General
The data presented in the “Landing – Slippery runway” is based on reasonable estimates of
the runway surface condition, effects on the braking phases.
This graph displays Landing Field length for reduced braking action
• Configuration FULL.
• 75 % Runway Factor.
• Braking Action from Good (Friction Coefficient 0.40) to Poor (Friction Coefficient 0.20).
• Reversers Inoperational.
Wind Component
Reported braking action
T-Tailwind H-Headwind
Performance limited
Landing Mass
v/s Braking Action
See § 13.3
Configuration FULL.
Anti-skid Operative (oper).
Wind Component Tailwind (T) 5 kt.
Reported Braking Action Medium (Friction Coefficient 0.30).
● Dry runway
● Damp runway
● 25% or more of the runway is contaminated with more than 3 mm of equivalent water
depth.
Note: Observe Cross Wind limitations according to AFM and standard operating procedures.
16.1 Flex
Flexible take-off can be used when the actual take-off weight is lower than the Performance
Take-off Mass.
The aircraft can meet the required performance with a reduced take-off thrust.
This is referred to as FLEXIBLE TAKE-OFF and the reduced thrust is called FLEXIBLE TAKE-OFF
THRUST.
The concept of using flexible take-off thrust is to increase engine life.
16.2 TREF
This is the maximum temperature at which certified power output of the engine can be
produced.
TREF is a function of pressure altitude. TOGA must be used if the calculated or actual
temperature is below TREF. If a flex is entered that is lower than T REF or actual temperature,
the ENG FLEX TEMP NOT SET ECAM message will be generated as the thrust levers are
moved to the FLEX/MCT detent.
If this happens, select TOGA thrust.
16.3 TMAX
Maximum Outside Air Temperature (OAT) certified for take-off. Take-off with an OAT above
the TMAX is not allowed. This is to ensure that the MCT limit is not exceeded. The value
reduces as pressure altitude increases.
16.4 TMAXFLEX
This is the maximum usable flex temperature, when actual thrust is 75% of the rated take-
off thrust.
The value reduces as pressure altitude increases.
17 Hydroplaning
17.1 General
As a tire rolls along a WET runway, it is constantly squeezing the water from the tread. The
squeezing action generates water pressure, which can lift portions of the tire off the runway
and reduce the amount of friction the tire can develop. This action is called hydroplaning.
The loss of friction can be partial or complete. There are three types of hydroplaning:
Viscous, Dynamic and Reverted Rubber.
17.2 Viscous
Viscous Hydroplaning is the loss of friction due to a thin film lubrication. It is mostly caused
by a very thin film of water over the rubber deposits in the touchdown area of the runway.
Although friction loss does occur, there is normally enough to cause wheel spin up in order
to initiate the anti-skid system.
17.3 Dynamic
Dynamic Hydroplaning occurs when the surface of the tire loses contact with a Wet runway
and rides up on the layer of water covering the runway. This effect is exactly the same as
when water skiing. When it occurs, tire friction is lost and wheel spin up may occur. High
speeds, standing water, tire condition, tread depth and runway surface texture and
conditions are all factors contributing to dynamic hydroplaning.
Reverted Rubber Hydroplaning is the loss of friction due to a tire skidding on a smooth wet
or icy surface. The heat due to friction generates steam, which lifts the tire off the runway.
The heat generated by the steam reverts the rubber to a black gummy substance. It can be
initiated at any speed above roughly 20Kts and results in tire friction levels equivalent to an
icy runway.
18 Mass Definitions
18.1 CATOM
Corrected Actual Takeoff Mass
18.2 CPTOM
Corrected Performance Limited Takeoff Mass
18.3 MLM
Maximum Landing Mass
18.4 MTOM
Maximum Takeoff Mass
18.5 PTOM
Performance Limited Take-Off Mass
19 Runway Conditions
A runway is considered to be contaminated when more than 25% of the runway surface area
(whether in isolated areas or not) within the required length and width being used is covered
by the following:
● Surface water more than 3 mm (0.125 in) deep, or by slush, or loose snow, equivalent
to more than 3 mm (0.125 in) of water.
● Snow which has been compressed into a solid mass which resists further
compression and will hold together or break into lumps if picked up (compacted
snow).
● Ice, including wet ice.
A runway is considered damp when the surface is not dry, but when the moisture on it does
not give it a shiny appearance. There are NO performance degradation considered for
operation on a damp runway.
Note: Airbus recommended NOT to take-off from a runway covered with more than 2 inches
of Dry snow or 1 inch of Wet snow.
20 Declared Distances
20.5 Stopway
An area at the end of the runway in the direction of take-off, not narrower than the runway
and centered along its existing centerline. It is able to support the aircraft during an aborted
take-off, without causing structural damage to the aircraft.
20.6 Clearway
An area at the end of the runway in the direction of take-off, not less than 500ft wide,
centered along the extended centerline, and under the control of the airport authorities. It
must not exceed an upslope of 1.25%, above which no object or terrain may protrude.
Threshold lights may protrude but have height restrictions.
21 Speeds
21.1 General
The airplane is assumed to accelerate with all engines operating from a standing start point
to the point where the critical engine fails (Vef). The airplane continues to accelerate, with
one engine inoperative to the point where the engine failure is recognized (V1). If the take-
off is continued, using only aerodynamic control and average pilot skills, the airplane
accelerates with one engine inoperative, to the point at which V2 is achieved at 35ft above
the end of runway.
If take-off is to be rejected, Maximum braking is applied at V1, throttles retarded, spoilers
extended. A short time delay is included after V1 to account for thrust reduction to idle and
spoiler deployment. It is assumed that maximum braking is used to bring the airplane to a
stop at the end of the runway. No credit is taken for the use of reverse thrust during the
certification process (dry runway).
The speeds presented below are a general explanation for various speeds used, other speeds
may be applicable for this ACFT type. Refer to respective AFM for further explanation
regarding speeds not included in this introduction.
21.2 V1
At and below V1 the takeoff can be rejected and the aircraft will stop within the accelerate
stop distance available at and above V1 the takeoff can be continued in case of an engine
failure. V1 must not be less than Vmcg.
21.3 VR
The speed at which rotation to a normal take-off altitude must begin in order to reach V2 by
35ft (Dry) or 15ft (Wet).VR must not be less than V1 and must be at least 1.05 times Vmca.
21.4 V2
V2, take-off safety speed, which must be reached by 35ft (Dry) or (15ft Wet) with one (1)
engine inoperative. V2 must not be less than 1.10 Vmca or 1.20 Vs.
21.5 VMCG
Minimum Control speed on the ground, from which directional control of the airplane can be
maintained on the ground after an engine failure without the use of brakes or nose-wheel
steering. In other words, it’s the minimum speed at which the control surfaces are effective
on the ground.
21.6 VMCA
The lowest speed, at which control of the airplane can be maintained in the air after an
engine failure. Banking slightly into the good engine usually enhances engine out capability.
Vmca is determined for the airplane with a 5° maximum bank angle during certification
process.
21.7 VMBE
This is the maximum speed at which the brakes can absorb all the energy required to stop
the airplane at a given mass. V1 must always be less than Vmbe.
F - Minimum speed, at which flaps may be retracted during take-off. In approach, used as a
target speed when the aircraft is in CONF 2 or CONF 3. Represented by “F” on the PFD speed
scale.
S - Minimum speed, at which slats may be retracted during take-off. In approach used as a
target speed when the aircraft is in CONF 1. Represented by “S” on the PFD speed scale.
O - Green Dot speed. Engine out operating speed in clean configuration, corresponds to the
Best lift to drag ratio. The speed is selected during final take-off segment and during a drift
down procedure, both in cases of engine failure. Represented by a green dot on the PFD
scale.
22 Flight Path
23 Climb Segments
23.1 General
Please refer to AFM and Company operating procedures for specific climb segments and
technique that apply to this specific acft type.
The climb segments below are described in general.
Conditions:
● Takeoff Flaps.
From gear retraction to the point at which the flaps and slats are being retracted. The
minimum required still Air climb gradient during this segment is:
Conditions:
● Takeoff Flaps.
● Speed=V2.
Conditions:
This is the acceleration height, which must be at least 400ft AFE (critical engine inoperative).
This segment is used for acceleration in order to retract the flaps and slats and to accelerate
to the optimum climb speed. This segment is assumed to be in level flight, so that excess
thrust can be applied for acceleration. The segment ends when maximum time (Oz) allowed
for use of take-off power expires, which depends on the AFM performance data and
regulation being used.
Conditions:
● Clean Configuration.
From end of third segment until the aircraft reaches 1500ft above the take-off surface or
more if required for obstacle clearance. This segment will only exist if thrust must be
reduced to MCT before the aircraft reaches 1500ft according to regulations.
24 Glossary
AA Airport Analysis
lbs Pounds
kg Kilogram
NA Not Authorized
INTENTIONALLY
LEFT
BLANK