You are on page 1of 8

Energy Conversion. Vol. IO, pp. 65-72. Pergamon Press, 1970.

Printed in Great Britain

Electrical
andThermoelectric
Properties
of Some
Metallic
Thermoelectric
Materials’
H, CHANGS
(Received 12 June 1969)

Introduction Coefficients of these materials which are essential to


The efficiency of a radioisotope thermoelectric genera- arrive at the optimum design of the pacemaker. The
tor increases with increasing figure-of-merit, 2, of the largest material samples available for testing, which
thermoelectric materials used to convert thermal energy have the same physical properties as those of the usual
directly into electrical energy. 2 is defined as S2/ph, fabricated small diameter thermoelectric elements, are
where S, p, and Xare respectively the Seebeck Coefficient, cylindrical rods with a diameter of approximately
the electrical resistivity, and the thermal conductivity .&in. The electrical resistivities and the Seebeck Coeffi-
of the material. Thermoelectric materials with high cients of Tophel Special and Cupron Special are measured
figure-of-merit are, therefore, excellent candidates for in the temperature range of 50-1000°C on these small
use in thermoelectric generators. In order to compute diameter samples. A precise and accurate method for
the figure-of-merit of a given material, it is essential to measuring the thermal conductivity of metals and their
know its thermal conductivity, electrical resistivity, and alloys, which are available only in small diameter
Seebeck Coefficient. Although the figure-of-merit of samples is reported in Refs. 1 and 2.
metallic thermoelectric materials is often an order of
magnitude smaller than those of semi-conductors,
Measurements of Electrical Resistivity of Cupron Special
metallic thermoelectric materials may be preferred for
and Tophel Special
practical reasons (i.e. high mechanical strength). Such
are the cases for Tophel Special and Cupron Special, Description of the method
both of which are manufactured by the Wilbur B. The long, cylindrical, small-diameter sample used in
Driver Company. Tophel Special is essentially a binary the electrical resistivity experiment is heated by a co-axial
Ni; Cr alloy with about 9.25 per cent Cr by weight, alumina tube. The alumina tube is brought up to tem-
with minor constituents less than 0.02 per cent each. perature through the electrical heating of the resistance
Cupron Special on the other hand, is a binary Ni; Cu wire threaded through the holes running longitudinally
alloy with approximately 60 per cent copper, 39.5 per in the wall of the tube. A one-inch section along the
cent nickel, and 0 *5 per cent manganese. Working center of the sample is considered to be the test section.
together as a thermocouple, Tophel Special and Cupron Two fine wires are attached to the sample, one at each
Special produces one of the highest thermoelectric end of the one-inch test section. These wires measure
power output among metallic thermoelectric materials. the voltage drop across the one-inch section of the
Cupron Special has the highest known negative sample. Alternating current is made to pass through
thermal emf vs. platinum, and Tophel Special is among the sample by means of two wires, one attached at either
materials having the highest positive thermal emf vs. end of the long cylindrical sample. The electrical re-
platinum. The temperature dependence of the thermal sistivity, p, of the sample material can be calculated from
conductivities and the electrical resistivities of these Equation 1.
materials were unknown; although the electrical re-
sistivities of these materials at room temperature were
reported by the Wilbur B. Driver Laboratory. In some- where R = electrical resistance of the test section (Q)
what better circumstances, the Seebeck Coefficients of A = area of the test section (cmz)
the Tophel Special and Cupron Special have been L = length of the test section (cm).
reported, which were calculated from emf vs. temperature
The electrical resistance, R, of the test section is cal-
data. Thermal conductivities of these materials were not
culated from Equation 2.
previously reported.
Cupron Special and Tophel Special were chosen as
the thermoelectric materials to be used in the design of
the Radioisotope Powered Cardiac Pacemaker. The
primary objectives of the present experiments are to where V, = voltage drop across the 1 in. test section
measure the electrical resistivities and the Seebeck (V
I = alternating current passing through the test
t This work was supported by the Atomic Energy Commission, section (r.m.s.).
under Contract AT(30-1) 3731.
$ Energy Conversion Division, Nuclear Materials and Equip- The alternating current, 1, was calculated by dividing
ment Corporation, Apollo, Pennsylvania. the resistance of a standard resistor, r, which is con-
65
66 H. CHANG

\ Precision non-inductive
Support
framewor?

Radiation
shields -

*.

r
*. _.....*

a.c.d~fferentlal voltameter
Powerstat

it
Alumina heater
00
reference
-
position

-
Fig. 1.

netted in series with the sample to the power supply, of a 5 in. long alumina tube (Degussa Catalog No.
into the voltage drop across the standard resistor, 80-67-065, bore diameter = 0.015 in., outside dia-
V,, i.e. Equation 3. meter = 0 -685 in. and wall thickness = 0 a085 in.). The
two free ends of the tantalum wire form the power
leads to the heater. The radiation heat loss of the heater
is reduced by placing around the heater three concentric
Apparatus layers of radiation shields made from 1 mil thick titanium
Figure 1 shows the schematic diagram and the details sheets.
of the apparatus used to measure the electrical resistivity At the top and bottom ends of the sample, holes are
of Tophel Special and Cupron Special. The cylindrical drilled to receive alumina rods, & in. dia., which extend
sample rod is O-127 in. in diameter and 5 in. long. to serve as centering and electrical insulating supports.
A 10 mil diameter wire of the same material as that of In the final assembly, the lower alumina sample
the sample is welded at each end of the sample rod. support rod fits into a hole drilled into the base of the
These wires serve as the current carrying leads into the support framework for this purpose. The top alumina
sample. A one inch length, measured one half inch above centering rod passes through a hole drilled in the center
and one half inch below the longitudinal mid-point of of the top plate of the framework, and is free to move
the sample is considered the test section. Two 5 mil up and down to allow for the thermal expansion of the
diameter wires, of the same material as that of the cylindrical sample. The alumina sample heater and the
sample, are spot welded on the sample surface, one at radiation shields are supported, both on top and bottom,
each end of that section, These serve as the voltage by 40 mil dia. alumina rods, which are in turn resting
taps for the purpose of measuring the voltage drop on the framework. The entire system is operated in
across the test section precisely. Four pairs of thermo- 1 x 10-e mm of mercury vacuum. Power is supplied to
couples (5 mil dia. Pt-10 per cent Rh) were spot welded the sample heater by powerstat bridges indicated
to the surface of the sample; they are symmetrically schematically on the right side of Fig. 1. The powerstat
located with respect to the midpoint of the sample bridges are connected directly to the output of a Sorensen
(see Fig. 1). Two pairs are located between the voltage 2501 a.c. voltage regulator. The input voltage is regulated
taps, each $ in. away from the mid-point. Two pairs are and controllable to within 10 PV as measured by a
located outside of the voltage taps, each 2 in. away Fluke 931 r.m.s. differential voltmeter. A Dale type
from the mid-point. These thermocouples monitor the (NH-lo) I Sz precision resistor (tolerance 0.05 per cent)
temperature of the sample in the neighborhood of the is connected in series with the cylindrical sample. Both
test section, which is uniformly heated and is expected the voltage drop across the test section of the sample
to be at a uniform temperature. and that of the resistor are measured by Fluke 931 r.m.s.
The co-axial sample heater is made by threading a differential voltmeter.
continuous length of 10 mil diameter tantalum wire Due to the fact that the Sorensen 2501 a.c. voltage
through the 24 bores running longitudinally in the wall regulator functions more precisely with a pure resistive
Electrical and Thermoelectric Properties of Some Metallic Thermoelectric Materials 67

load, a bank of non-inductive resistors (approximately after the sample reached the desired level during heating.
220 Q) is connected in series with the precision resistor The precision of the electrical measurements them-
and the sample for the purpose of attaining the desired selves were within & O-1 per cent. The errors introduced
value of current going through the sample. This circuit in calculating the electrical resistivity were experimental
is connected directly to the output of the Sorensen errors inherent in the measurements of the length
regulator. Furthermore, since the electrical resistance of between the voltage taps and the area of the test section.
the test section is orders of magnitude smaller than The total error in calculating the electrical resistivity
that of the precision resistor, it is desirable to connect was less than 2 per cent, a very precise measurement.
the cylindrical sample next to the low voltage lead of
Results and discussion of results
the power input to the circuit for the most precise
The electrical resistivity of Cupron Special was
measurement possible. This is done in order to reduce
measured in the temperature range between 35 and
the effect due to excessive electronic noise.
Temperature. OK
The thermocouple emfs are measured by a Leeds & 273 373 473 573 673 773 873 373 1073 1173 I 73
Northrup K-5 potentiometer against a zero-degree
reference temperature bath. The distance between the
thermocouples was measured with a Nikon measuring
microscope.

Experimental procedure and error


Cupron special
At the start of the electrical resistivity experiments, d:

the test section of the cylindrical sample is brought up 7; 30-


Sample drnension

to uniform temperature by means of the radiated heat .cc Length


x- 0.1265 tn. 0.992 I”.
transfer from the alumina sample heater. The power 0 Measured by Chang
into the sample heater was adjusted to the appropriate IO- A Reported by Wilbur B. Driver Co.

level through the powerstats such that the thermo-


I 1 I I I I I , 9

couples monitoring the temperatures of the test section 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 I DO

would indicate the desired temperature. The electrical Temperature, “C

resistance of the banks of non-inductive resistors is so Fig. 2.


chosen as to limit the current passing through the test 800°C. The values obtained have been tabulated in
section of the cylindrical sample to approximately half Table 1 and plotted in Fig. 2. The electrical resistivity
of an ampere. This r.m.s. value of the current appeared of Cupron Special reported here is compared with the
satisfactory, for it induced a voltage drop across the values of Cupron Special and Cupron reported by the
test section large enough to be measured precisely and Wilbur B. Driver Company [3] at room temperature.
it did not induce enough electrical heating of the test The Cupron Special data at room temperature reported
section to disturb the uniform temperature already here agrees extremely well with those measured by the
established there. After the entire system is stabilized, Wilbur B. Driver Company. It is interesting to note
the voltage drops across the precision resistor and that the electrical resistivity of Cupron Special first
across the test section are measured simultaneously. decreases with temperature slightly and then increases
The temperature at each thermocouple was also measured with temperature up to 800°C. The increases were also
and recorded. This test procedure is repeated at every very small. At temperatures higher than 8OO”C, it was
50°C of rise in temperature of the test section between observed that the copper of the Cupron Special started
the temperature range of 35-800°C. A double check to vaporize and deposit on the cooler portions of the
on this data was effected by lowering the temperature radiation shield. For this reason the tests were not
of the test section at the same temperature interval made beyond 800°C.
Table 1. Electrical resistivity of Cupron Special vs. temperature

Mean Electrical Mean Electrical


Test temperature T resistivity Test temperature T resistivity
(“C) p (Q-cm) x lo6 (“C) p(Lkm) x IO”

I 35 46.017 1.5 437 44.086 --


2 40 46.017 16 438 44.086
3 44 46.017 17 480 44.086
4 83 45.374 18 519 44,406
5 92 45.694 19 558 44.406
6 100 45.051 20 589 44.406
7 137 45.051 21 593 44.406
8 162 44.730 22 627 44.729
9 214 44.730 23 662 44.729
10 254 44.406 24 697 45.051
II 295 44.086 25 731 45.051
12 300 44’086 26 732 45.374
13 348 44.086 27 792 45.694
14 394 44.086
68 H. CHANG

The electrical resistivity of Tophel Special was the temperature gradient experienced by that portion
measured in the temperature range between 35 and of the sample. Mathematically, the temperature gradient
1000°C. Values obtained are tabulated in Table 2 and is approximated by:
plotted in Fig. 3. The Tophel Special data at room
temperature reported here agree well within 2 per cent dT Tl-Tz AT
dL -x-=AL’ (1)
Temperature, “K

273 373
I
473
1
573
I
673
I
773
/
873
/
973 ICI73
/
1173
I
1273 where AT = the difference between the two tempera-
90 tures, Tl > TZ
AL = the distance between the locations of the
thermocouples.
Judicious choice of Pt-10 per cent Rh and Pt thermo-
couples provided the essential elements in the Seebeck
Coefficient experiment. When the free ends of the
Sample dmension platinum elements from each pair of the two thermo-
Dlo.
0427in.
&gt&
1~9331n.
couples were attached to the voltage inputs of the
0 Measured by Chang potentiometer, a voltage was registered. This voltage
0 Reported by Wilbur B. Driver Co. is essentially the Seebeck emf generated by a newly
created thermocouple formed with the sample material
/ I I 1 ___--J under study as one element and platinum as the other.
200 loo 200 300 400 500 500 700 800 900 1000
The new thermocouple operates at a hot junction
Temperature I “C
temperature and a cold junction temperature of TI and TZ
Fig. 3.
respectively (TI > Tz).
of the value reported by the Wilbur B. Driver Company The Seebeck Coefficient of the material under test
and it follows the same trend as Tophel, which was with respect to platinum at the average temperature,
reported by the Wilbur B. Driver Company. It is interest- TA = (TI + T2)/2, is defined by Equation 2.
ing to note that Tophel Special, although an alloy,
behaves much like a pure metal in the sense that its aE AE
crpt = ar w KT (2)
electrical resistivity is approximately proportional to the
absolute temperature. where aPt = Seebeck Coefficient of the unknown
material with respect to platinum
Measurements of Seebeck Coefficients of Tophel Special aE = Partial derivative of the Seebeck emf
and Cupron Special
z generated with respect to temperature
Description of the method
In the Seebeck Coefficient experiment, the long, AE = Seebeck emf generated between the pla-
small-diameter, cylindrical sample is heated in such a tinum leads and the material under test
way that it exhibits a longitudinal temperature gradient while subjected to hot and cold junction
in the portion of the sample which is considered to be temperature of TZ and TI respectively
the test section. AT = difference between the hot and cold
Two pairs of thermocouples (Pt-IO per cent Rh junction temperature TI - Tz.
and Pt wires) were attached to the surface of the sample
test section evenly spaced along its axis. Apparatus
The difference between the two temperatures measured Figure 4 shows the schematic diagram of the apparatus
divided by the distance between their locations yields used to measure the Seebeck Coefficient of Tophel

Table 2. Electrical resistivity of Tophel Special vs. temperature

Mean Electrical Mean Electrical


Test temperature T resistivity Test temperature T resistivity
(“C) p (Q-cm) x lo6 (“C) p (Q-cm) x lo6

1 36 63.000 15 419 14.520


2 45 63.000 16 500 75.820
3 50 63.180 17 517 76.400
4 50 63.480 18 542 76.460
5 68 63.730 19 555 76.755
6 69.5 63.800 20 600 77.580
7 119 65.670 21 699 79.380
8 161 66.980 22 703 79.465
9 199 68.000 23 802 81 .OOO
10 236 69.060 24 900 82.980
11 267 69.820 25 900 83.268
12 287 70.123 26 923 83.430
13 351 72,245 27 983 84.400
14 400 73 ’870
Electrical and Thermoelectric Properties of Some Metallic Thermoelectric Materials 69

q,Vacuum system

Pow‘erstat

Fig. 4.

Special and Cupron Special. The temperature gradient used to establish the temperature gradient along the
along the axis of the cylindrical sample can be established axis of the cylindrical sample (see Fig. 5).
by either of two methods, the details of which are shown The first method involved heating the sample at the
in Fig. 5. two extreme ends. Two identical heaters, with one
The cylindrical sample rod is 0.128 in. in diameter heater maintained at a higher temperature than the
(average value) and 6 in. long. Four pairs of thermo- other, establish the temperature gradient causing heat
couple (5 mil dia. platinum-10 per cent rhodium) were flow in the sample from the high temperature end to
spot welded to the surface of the sample. They are the low temperature end. Each of the two heaters is
symmetrically located with respect to the longitudinal made by threading a continuous length of 10 mil diameter
mid-point of the sample (see Fig. 4). Two pairs are tantalum wire through the 24 bores running longitudinally
located one half inch away from the mid-point and the in the wall of a one half inch long alumina tube (Degussa
remaining two pairs are located one and one half inches Catalog No. 80-67-065 bore dia. = 15 mils outside
away from the mid-point. These thermocouples serve diameter = O-685 in., and wall thickness = 0.085 in.).
dual functions: they monitor the temperature of the The two free ends of the tantalum wire of each heater
sample surface at the location where they are attached, form the power leads to the heater.
and they contribute their platinum elements as one leg The heaters are placed co-axially around each end
of a new thermocouple which functions with the material of the cylindrical sample, in the manner most conducive
to be tested as the other leg. Two heating methods were to radiant energy transfer between the heaters and the

Top alumina heater


--RodlotIon shields Radiation shields

-Sample Sample

-Alumma heater

Radiation shields

Bottom
alumina heater
LSupporting frame Supporting frame

_To vacuum
Method I system

Fig. 5.
70 H. CHANG

ends of the sample. The radiation heat losses of the Experimental procedure and error
heaters are reduced by placing around the heater three At the start of a Seebeck Coefficient experiment, the
concentric layers of radiation shields. Three layers of test section of the cylindrical sample is brought up to
radiation shields are placed above and below the heaters. the desired temperature gradient by means of the radiant
The shields were fabricated from 1 mil thick titanium heat transfer between the co-axial alumina sample heater
sheets. and the sample.
The second method involving heating the sample with Method I has the advantage of being capable of
a co-axial alumina tube running almost the whole length producing a small temperature gradient with high pre-
of the sample. The heater used here is manufactured in cision, however, it produces a low sample temperature
the exact same fashion as those made for use in Method to heater power ratio due to the high heat losses at the
1, except that the alumina tube employed in this case ends of the heaters. It is, therefore, an excellent method
is 5 in. in length. Inherently, a temperature gradient of heating the sample when the Seebeck Coefficient of
exists in this alumina tube. This is because the radiant the sample material is measured below 100°C. Method 2,
heat is being lost faster at the ends of the heater than on the other hand, yields a much higher temperature
at the center. Similar to Method 1, the thermal radiation gradient with lower precision. Therefore, Method 2 is
heat losses of the heater are reduced by the use of con- found to be more satisfactory in providing the tempera-
centric layers of radiation shields. ture gradient for tests conducted above 100°C.
At the top and bottom ends of the sample, holes are The power input to the sample heater is adjusted to the
drilled to receive alumina rods which extend to serve as appropriate level through the powerstats, in a manner
centering and thermal insulating supports. In the final that the thermocouples attached to the sample surface
assembly, the lower alumina sample support rod fits would indicate the desired temperature gradient. After
into a hole drilled into the base of the support frame- the temperature of the entire system is established, the
work for this purpose. The top alumina centering rod temperature of all four thermocouples is measured and
passes through a hole drilled in the centre of the top the Seebeck emf’s generated between the platinum legs
plate of the framework and is free to move up and down of any two adjacent thermocouples and the material
to allow for thermal expansion of the cylindrical sample. to be tested between the two thermocouples are measured
The alumina sample heater and the radiation shields and recorded. In this manner, each test would result in
are supported both on top and bottom by 40 mil diameter at least three independent sets of data, which may be
alumina rods, which are in turn resting on the frame- used to advantage in reducing the total number of tests.
work as shown in Fig. 5. The above test procedure is repeated at every 50°C of
The entire system is operated in 1 x 10-s mm of rise of the average temperature of the test section between
mercury vacuum. Power is supplied to the sample the temperature range of 30 and 800°C. Experimentally,
heater by powerstat bridges indicated schematically in it is found that a 10°C difference measured between any
Insert AA of Fig. 4. The powerstat bridges are con- two adjacent thermocouples yields the most accurate
nected directly to the output of a Sorensen 2501 a.c. Seebeck Coefficients for the following reasons:
voltage regulator. The input voltage to the heater is
regulated and controllable to within 10 mV as measured 1. As the temperature difference measured between
by a Fluke 931 PB r.m.s. differential voltmeter. The any two adjacent thermocouples increases the
thermocouple emf is measured by a Leeds & Northrup approximation of AEjAT representing aEjaT = apt
K-5 potentiometer against a 0” reference temperature becomes less and less accurate.
bath. The distance between the thermocouples was 2. As the temperature difference measured between
measured by a Nikon measuring microscope. any two adjacent thermocouples decreases, the

Table 3. Seebeck coefficients calculated from test data of Tophel Special

Mean Seebeck Mean Seebeck


Test temperature T coefficient Test temperature T coefficient
(“C) /LV/ ‘C (“0 lLV/“C

1 71.6 32.443 15 277.6 37.013


2 91.7 34.335 16 290.8 37.231
3 105.1 33.583 17 310.5 37.600
4 144.5 35.567 18 325.3 36.844
5 130.4 33.953 19 313.0 37.213
6 134.7 35.255 20 329.0 36.128
7 167.2 34 700 21 365.5 36.877
8 161.0 34.880 22 385.7 36,887
9 208.5 36.117 23 395.7 37.545
10 216.6 35.838 24 418.6 36.532
11 247.5 37.325 25 488.0 36.544
12 258.5 35.699 26 518.2 35.607
13 277.6 36.947 27 601. I 35.414
14 290.8 37.125 28 638.1 34.773
Electrical and Thermoelectric Properties of Some Metallic Thermoelectric Materials 71

errors in measuring AT play a greater part in the Temperature, OK

inaccuracy of the calculation of apt. 273 373 473 573 673 773 873 973
I I I I
Theoretically, therefore, the temperature measured
E I ---o-- Calculated from W.El0EMFV.S.T. data
between any two adjacent thermocoupIes should be -x- Measured by Chang
made as small as the accuracy of the calculated apt & Length
Sample dimension 0.28in. 6-O in.
permits. However, the errors introduced are usually Ni Cu Mn
from the calculation of the temperature difference when Approximate composition 39.7 59.9 0.4

it is converted from the emf to temperature reading


following the standard tables published by the National
Bureau of Standards for Pt-Rh thermocouples. The
total precision of the data is within 2 per cent (voltage
measurements are within 0.1 per cent).

Results and discussion of results


The Seebeck Coefficient of Tophel Special and Cupron
Special with respect to platinum was measured in the
Temperature, OK
273 373 473 573 673 773 073 973 II
I 1 I I I I
i

-6Oi I I I I I
100 200 3210 400 500 600 700 I
Temperature, “C

Fig. 7.

temperature range between loo”-800°C. The values


obtained have been tabulated and plotted in Tables
3, 4 and Figs. 6, 7 respectively. Seebeck Coefficients of
Tophel Special and Cupron Special are also calculated
plJ. Length from the emf vs. temperature data [3] of these materials
Sample dimension 0.128in. 6.0~1.
with respect to platinum. The emf vs. temperature data
NI Cf
Approximate compositlon 0.9 0.1 of each of the two materials with respect to platinum
--o-- Calculated from W.B.D.EMF V.S.T.data is curve fitted by a polynomial through the use of re-
-x- Measured by Chang gression analysis on an IBM computer. The resulting
. Reference I equation is then differentiated with respect to the tem-
perature, yielding Seebeck Coefficient of that material
with respect to platinum. The calculated values are also
plotted in Figs. 6 and 7 for comparison as shown in
I I I I I
300 400 500 600 700 E dotted lines. The measured values and those calculated
Temperature, OC show excellent agreement.
Fig. 6. Reference [3] reported four measured values of the

Table 4. Seeheck Coefficients calculated from test data of Cupron Special

Mean Seebeck Mean Seebeck


Test temperature T coefficient Test temperature r coefficient
(“C) /LV13C (’0 /.LV/‘C
______
1 56.0 37.931 19 309.4 49.861
2 56.8 36 274 20 346.9 51.547
3 62.4 38.200 21 361.4 52.143
4 102.5 41.129 22 392.6 52.565
5 104.5 40.666 23 410.3 52.382
6 104.8 42.878 24 443.3 53.225
7 107.1 43.421 25 464.4 52 500
8 134.7 43.116 26 522.1 54.329
9 137.9 44.627 27 548.8 53.134
10 145.8 45.124 28 620.5 54 745
II 149.4 44.603 29 653.6 53.980
12 167.4 45 379 30 664.5 55.108
13 171.9 45.117 31 700.4 54 405
14 190.3 46.976 32 704.6 54.750
15 196.1 47.030 33 742.7 53.683
16 249.8 48 075 34 751’ 1 54.832
17 258.5 50.509 35 792.3 53.453
18 298.3 51.806
-
72 H. CHAN G

absolute Seebeck Coefficient of Tophel Special (Ni; Cr resistivities and Seebeck Coefficients of Tophel Special
9 *25 per cent), each at a different temperature. Three and Cupron Special can be adapted for similar measure-
of these values fall in the temperature range of the ments on metals and alloys.
present measured data. The absolute Seebeck Coefficient
of Tophel Special can be transformed to the relative
Acknowledgement--The author would like to express his gratitude
Seebeck Coefficient of Tophel Special with respect to to the Atomic Energy Commission and the Nuclear Materials and
platinum by subtracting out the absolute Seebeck Equipment Corporation for their equipment and financial support
Coefficient of platinum given in Ref. [4]. For additional of this work. Appreciation is extended to Mr. Stanley Stein for his
assistance in the laboratory.
comparison, the relative Seebeck Coefficients, so trans-
formed, are also plotted in Fig. 6 as dark circles. The
agreement between the transformed value and the present
measured values are also excellent. References
[I] H. Chang and M. G. Blair, A longitudinal symmetrical heat
Conclusions flow apparatus for the determination of the thermal con-
ductivity of metals and their alloys, Thermal Conductivity-Proc.
The measured electrical resistivities and the Seebeck 7th Co& NBS Special PubI. 302, p. 355, September (1968).
Coefficients of Tophel Special and Cupron Special are [2] H. Chang and M. G. Blair, A longitudinal symmetrical heat
flow apparatus for the determination of the thermal con-
precise and accurate. This conclusion is substantiated ductivity of metals and their alloys: on armco iron, Proc. 8rh
by the fact that the reproducibility of the data is excellent Co& on Thermal Conductivity, Purdue Univ., October (1968).
and that a very close agreement exists between the [3] T. P. Wang, C. D. Starr and N. Brown, Thermoelectric charac-
teristics of binary alloys and nickels, Acta metall. 14 (1966).
present data and those previously available. [4] J. Nystrom, Thomson coefficients for copper at high tem-
The method used for the measurements of electrical peratures, Ark. Mat. Astr. Fys. 34A (1937).

You might also like