UJI VALIDITAS

Correlations

x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 x9 y1 y2 y3 y4 y5 y6 y7 Skor

Pearson Correlation 1 .a ,378* -,327 ,250 -,050 -,105 ,044 -,161 1,000** -,120 -,105 ,094 ,094 -,286 -,105 ,110

x1 Sig. (2-tailed) . ,039 ,077 ,183 ,795 ,581 ,816 ,395 ,000 ,529 ,581 ,619 ,619 ,126 ,581 ,562

N 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30
Pearson Correlation .a .a .a .a .a .a .a .a .a .a .a .a .a .a .a .a .a
x2 Sig. (2-tailed) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
N 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30
Pearson Correlation ,378* .a 1 -,289 ,236 ,263 ,347 ,157 ,373* ,378* ,253 ,139 ,400* ,250 -,189 ,139 ,412*
x3 Sig. (2-tailed) ,039 . ,122 ,209 ,161 ,061 ,408 ,042 ,039 ,177 ,465 ,029 ,183 ,317 ,465 ,024
N 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30
Pearson Correlation -,327 .a -,289 1 ,191 ,152 ,120 ,241 ,031 -,327 ,183 ,320 -,144 ,144 ,055 -,080 ,302
x4 Sig. (2-tailed) ,077 . ,122 ,312 ,424 ,527 ,199 ,872 ,077 ,334 ,084 ,447 ,447 ,775 ,674 ,105
N 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30
Pearson Correlation ,250 .a ,236 ,191 1 -,199 -,026 ,196 ,262 ,250 -,120 -,223 ,236 ,520** -,071 ,367* ,412*
x5 Sig. (2-tailed) ,183 . ,209 ,312 ,293 ,891 ,299 ,162 ,183 ,529 ,237 ,209 ,003 ,708 ,046 ,024
N 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30
Pearson Correlation -,050 .a ,263 ,152 -,199 1 ,473** ,082 ,308 -,050 ,415* ,473** ,263 -,131 -,199 -,073 ,235
x6 Sig. (2-tailed) ,795 . ,161 ,424 ,293 ,008 ,666 ,098 ,795 ,023 ,008 ,161 ,489 ,293 ,702 ,211
N 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30
Pearson Correlation -,105 .a ,347 ,120 -,026 ,473** 1 ,119 ,650** -,105 ,877** ,423* ,555** -,277 -,223 -,154 ,371*
x7 Sig. (2-tailed) ,581 . ,061 ,527 ,891 ,008 ,529 ,000 ,581 ,000 ,020 ,001 ,138 ,237 ,417 ,044
N 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30
Pearson Correlation ,044 .a ,157 ,241 ,196 ,082 ,119 1 ,142 ,044 ,124 ,119 ,157 ,117 -,192 ,065 ,892**
x8 Sig. (2-tailed) ,816 . ,408 ,199 ,299 ,666 ,529 ,454 ,816 ,514 ,529 ,408 ,536 ,308 ,732 ,000
N 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30
Pearson Correlation -,161 .a ,373* ,031 ,262 ,308 ,650** ,142 1 -,161 ,539** ,207 ,853** ,213 -,494** ,207 ,441*
x9 Sig. (2-tailed) ,395 . ,042 ,872 ,162 ,098 ,000 ,454 ,395 ,002 ,272 ,000 ,258 ,006 ,272 ,015
N 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30
Pearson Correlation 1,000** .a ,378* -,327 ,250 -,050 -,105 ,044 -,161 1 -,120 -,105 ,094 ,094 -,286 -,105 ,110
y1 Sig. (2-tailed) ,000 . ,039 ,077 ,183 ,795 ,581 ,816 ,395 ,529 ,581 ,619 ,619 ,126 ,581 ,562
N 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30
Pearson Correlation -,120 .a ,253 ,183 -,120 ,415* ,877** ,124 ,539** -,120 1 ,351 ,443* -,126 -,299 -,175 ,337
y2 Sig. (2-tailed) ,529 . ,177 ,334 ,529 ,023 ,000 ,514 ,002 ,529 ,057 ,014 ,505 ,109 ,354 ,069
N 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30
Pearson Correlation -,105 .a ,139 ,320 -,223 ,473** ,423* ,119 ,207 -,105 ,351 1 ,139 -,277 -,026 -,154 ,245
y3 Sig. (2-tailed) ,581 . ,465 ,084 ,237 ,008 ,020 ,529 ,272 ,581 ,057 ,465 ,138 ,891 ,417 ,191
N 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30
 Pearson Correlation ,094 .a ,400* -,144 ,236 ,263 ,555** ,157 ,853** ,094 ,443* ,139 1 ,250 -,472** ,139 ,442*
y4 Sig. (2-tailed) ,619 . ,029 ,447 ,209 ,161 ,001 ,408 ,000 ,619 ,014 ,465 ,183 ,008 ,465 ,014
N 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30
Pearson Correlation ,094 .a ,250 ,144 ,520** -,131 -,277 ,117 ,213 ,094 -,126 -,277 ,250 1 -,189 ,555** ,307
y5 Sig. (2-tailed) ,619 . ,183 ,447 ,003 ,489 ,138 ,536 ,258 ,619 ,505 ,138 ,183 ,317 ,001 ,099
N 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30
Pearson Correlation -,286 .a -,189 ,055 -,071 -,199 -,223 -,192 -,494** -,286 -,299 -,026 -,472** -,189 1 -,026 -,257
y6 Sig. (2-tailed) ,126 . ,317 ,775 ,708 ,293 ,237 ,308 ,006 ,126 ,109 ,891 ,008 ,317 ,891 ,170
N 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30
Pearson Correlation -,105 .a ,139 -,080 ,367* -,073 -,154 ,065 ,207 -,105 -,175 -,154 ,139 ,555** -,026 1 ,204
y7 Sig. (2-tailed) ,581 . ,465 ,674 ,046 ,702 ,417 ,732 ,272 ,581 ,354 ,417 ,465 ,001 ,891 ,281
N 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30
Pearson Correlation ,110 .a ,412* ,302 ,412* ,235 ,371* ,892** ,441* ,110 ,337 ,245 ,442* ,307 -,257 ,204 1

Skor Sig. (2-tailed) ,562 . ,024 ,105 ,024 ,211 ,044 ,000 ,015 ,562 ,069 ,191 ,014 ,099 ,170 ,281

N 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30

*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
a. Cannot be computed because at least one of the variables is constant.

REALIBILITY
Case Processing Summary

N %

Valid 30 100,0
Cases Excludeda 0 ,0

Total 30 100,0

a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the

procedure.

Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's N of Items
Alpha

,612 17
Menurut Nunnally (dalam Imam Ghozali, 2006)) suatu konstruk atau variabel dapat dikatakan reliabel jika memberikan nilai Cronbach Alpha > 0,60 pada hasil pengujian. Nilai Cronbach Alpha dari tabel di atas sebesar
0.612 atau 61,2% yang menunjukan bahwa ke-17 pernyataan cukup reliabel, atau menunjukan nilai Cronbach Aplha 95,9 % yang menurut kriteria Nunnally (1994) bisa dikatakan RELIABE

Item Statistics

Mean Std. Deviation N

x1 1,9333 ,25371 30
x2 2,0000 ,00000 30
x3 1,6667 ,47946 30
x4 1,4000 ,49827 30
x5 1,4667 ,50742 30
x6 1,9667 ,18257 30
x7 1,8667 ,34575 30
x8 2,6000 3,67283 30
x9 1,7333 ,44978 30
y1 1,9333 ,25371 30
y2 1,8333 ,37905 30
y3 1,8667 ,34575 30
y4 1,6667 ,47946 30
y5 1,6667 ,47946 30
y6 1,4667 ,50742 30
y7 1,8667 ,34575 30
Skor 28,9333 4,77012 30

Item-Total Statistics

Scale Mean if Scale Variance Corrected Item- Cronbach's

Item Deleted if Item Deleted Total Alpha if Item
Correlation Deleted

x1 55,9333 90,547 ,084 ,613

x2 55,8667 91,016 ,000 ,615
x3 56,2000 87,476 ,369 ,599
x4 56,4667 88,395 ,253 ,604
x5 56,4000 87,283 ,367 ,599
x6 55,9000 90,231 ,217 ,611
x7 56,0000 88,690 ,339 ,604
x8 55,2667 41,995 ,746 ,430
x9 56,1333 87,430 ,402 ,599
y1 55,9333 90,547 ,084 ,613
y2 56,0333 88,723 ,301 ,605
y3 56,0000 89,517 ,211 ,609
y4 56,2000 87,200 ,400 ,598
y5 56,2000 88,441 ,260 ,604
y6 56,4000 93,766 -,306 ,631
y7 56,0000 89,793 ,168 ,610
Skor 28,9333 22,754 1,000 ,326

UJI NORMALITAS KORMOGLOV SMIRNOV

KRITERIA PENGUJIAN:
>0.5 DATA NORMAL
<O.5 DATA TIDAK NORMAL

One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test

x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 x9 y1 y2 y3 y4 y5 y6 y7 Skor

N 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30
Mean 1,9333 2,0000 1,6667 1,4000 1,4667 1,9667 1,8667 2,6000 1,7333 1,9333 1,8333 1,8667 1,6667 1,6667 1,4667 1,8667 28,9333
Normal Parametersa,b
Std. Deviation ,25371 ,00000c ,47946 ,49827 ,50742 ,18257 ,34575 3,67283 ,44978 ,25371 ,37905 ,34575 ,47946 ,47946 ,50742 ,34575 4,77012
Absolute ,537 ,423 ,389 ,354 ,539 ,517 ,532 ,457 ,537 ,503 ,517 ,423 ,423 ,354 ,517 ,232
Most Extreme Differences Positive ,396 ,251 ,389 ,354 ,428 ,350 ,532 ,277 ,396 ,330 ,350 ,251 ,251 ,354 ,350 ,232
Negative -,537 -,423 -,286 -,320 -,539 -,517 -,368 -,457 -,537 -,503 -,517 -,423 -,423 -,320 -,517 -,203
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z 2,941 2,318 2,130 1,941 2,953 2,831 2,911 2,501 2,941 2,756 2,831 2,318 2,318 1,941 2,831 1,273
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) ,000 ,000 ,000 ,001 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,001 ,000 ,078

a. Test distribution is Normal.

b. Calculated from data.
c. The distribution has no variance for this variable. One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test cannot be performed.
 REGRESI LINIER SEDERHANA
(IJI HIPOTESIS)

Variables Entered/Removeda

Model Variables Variables Method

Entered Removed

Pelayanan_fasili . Enter
1
tasb

a. Dependent Variable: Tingkat_Kenyamanan

b. All requested variables entered.

Tabel diatas menjelaskan tentang variabel yang dimasukkan serta metode yang digunakan. Dalam hal ini variabel yang dimasukkan adalah variabel pelayanan fasilitas sebagai
variabel independent dan tingkat sebagai variabel dependent dan metode yang digunakan adalah Enter.

Model Summary

Model R R Square Adjusted R Std. Error of the

Square Estimate

1 ,644a ,415 ,394 1,59094

a. Predictors: (Constant), Pelayanan_fasilitas

Tabel diatas menjelaskan besarnya korelasi/hubungan yaitu sebesar 0.644. dari output tersebut diperoleh koefisien determinasi (R Square) sebesar 0.415 yang mengandung arti
bahwa pengaruh variabel bebas (pelayanan fasilitas) terhadap variabel terikat (tingkat kenyaman) adalah sebesar 41,5%.

ANOVAa

Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.

Regression 50,329 1 50,329 19,884 ,000b

1 Residual 70,871 28 2,531

Total 121,200 29
a. Dependent Variable: Tingkat_Kenyamanan
b. Predictors: (Constant), Pelayanan_fasilitas

Tabel diatas menampilkan output yang menjelaskan nilai F hitung: 19.884 dengan tingkat signifikansi sebesar 0.000<0.05, maka model regresi dapat dipakai untuk memprediks
variabel tingkat kenyamanan atau dengan kata lain ada pengaruh variabel pelayanan fasilitas(X) terhadap variabel tingkat kenyamanan(Y)

Coefficientsa

Model Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized t Sig.

Coefficients

B Std. Error Beta

(Constant) 4,814 1,330 3,621 ,001

1
Pelayanan_fasilitas ,415 ,093 ,644 4,459 ,000

a. Dependent Variable: Tingkat_Kenyamanan

Diketahui nilai constant (a) sebesar 4.814. sedangkan pelayanan fasilitas (b/koefisien regresi) sebesar 0.415, sehingga persamaan regresi dapat ditulis:
Y= a+bX
Y= 4.814 + 0.415X
Persamaan tersebut dapat dijelaskan:
 Konstanta sebesar 4.814 mengandung arti bahwa nilai koefisien variabel tingkat kenyamanan 4.814
 Koefisien regresi X sebesar 0.415 menyatakan bahwa setiap penambahan 1% nilai pelayanan fasilitas , maka nilai kenyamanan bertambah sebesar 0.415. koefisien regresi
tersebut bernilai positif, sehingga dapat dikatakan bahwa arah pengaruh variabel X terhadap variabe Y adalah positif.
PENGAMBILAN KEPUTUSAN DALAM UJI REGRESI SEDERHANA
 Berdasarkan nilai signifikan: dari tabel Coefficients diperoleh nilai signifikan sebesar 0.000 < 0.05, sehingga dapat disimpulkan bahwa variabel pelayanan fasilitas (X)
berpengaruh terhadap variabel tingkat kenyaman (Y)
 Berdasarkan nilai t: diketahui nilai thitung sebesar 4.459 > dari ttabel 2,048, sehingga dapat disimpulkan bahwa variabel pelayanan fasilitas (X) berpengaruh terhadap
variabel tingkat kepuasan (Y)
t table = ( a/2 : n-k-1 )
= ( 0.05/2 : 30-1-1 )
= ( 0.025 : 28 ) (lihat pada distribusi t nilai tabel)
 = 2,048

UJI KORELASI PRODUCT MOMENT

Ho: pelayanan fasilitas tidak berhubungan dengan tingkat kenyamanan penghuni kost 63
Ha: pelayanan fasilitas berhubungan dengan tingkat kenyamanan penghuni kost 63
Sig >0,05 Ho diterima Ha ditolak
Sig <0,05 Ho ditolak Ha diterima

Correlations

Pelayanan_fasili Tingkat_Kenya
tas manan

Pearson Correlation 1 ,644**

Pelayanan_fasilitas Sig. (2-tailed) ,000

N 30 30
Pearson Correlation ,644** 1

Tingkat_Kenyamanan Sig. (2-tailed) ,000

N 30 30

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

Diketahui nilai signifikannya adalah 0,000

Berarti ada hubungan antara pelayanan fasilitas terhadap tingkat kenyaman penghuni kost 63 karena nilai signya 0,000 < 0,05
Tabel diatas menyatakan bahwa hubungan korelasi variabel x terhadap variabel Y cukup tinggi karena mendekati angka 1