Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The workshop aims to bring together key stakeholders from the government, civil society and the private sectors in
Kenya and Mozambique, who have a delegated role in environmental governance of the mining sector and have been
addressing these challenges from different perspectives. With focus on the recent assessments for the mining sector,
namely the Strategic environmental and social assessment (SESA) in Kenya and the Rule of Law in Public
Administration (RoLPA) in Mozambique. The overall objective of this workshop is to strengthen participants’
knowledge and skills to create (and sustain) a multi-stakeholder forum for collaborative learning and discussions on
how rights based approaches can lead to more a responsive, participatory, accountable and sustainable governance
of the mining sector.
This will be done through exchange of knowledge, experiences and good practices across countries and sectors
(governments, civil society and the private sector), presentations by experts and practitioners, group discussions
using real-life cases from Kenya, Mozambique and Sweden, and back-to-work action planning to address participants’
contextual challenges. The workshop is designed in close collaboration between UNDP, the Swedish Environmental
Protection Agency and national counterparts.
Learning Objectives
Participants
Nema; Ministry of Mining of Kenya; Ministry of Environment, Natural Resources & Regional Development Authorities
of Kenya; Kwale County Government; Department of Occupational Health and Safety Services (DOSHS); Kenyan
National Commission on Human Rights; Huria (NGO); Chamber of Mines; UNDP Kenya; UNDP Mozambique; Mozambican
National Commission on Human Rights; MIREME; INAMI; MITADER; AQUA; DINAB; Swedish Environmental Protection
Agency; UNDP Bureau for Policy and Programme Support; Lund University; Source International; and Swedish
Geological AB.
1
PRELIMINARY AGENDA
9:00-9:30 Introduction by facilitators: Purpose of the workshop, expected outcomes, and schedule.
9:30-10:45 Results from the assessments of the mining sector in Mozambique and Kenya
Short presentations of the key findings in the RoLPAM in Mozambique and SESA in Kenya,
followed by a panel discussion with representatives from government, human rights
institutions, and the private sector with a specific focus on the themes that will be covered
in the workshop. These presentations will include any plans for how to address key gaps and
challenges in Kenya and Mozambique.
10:45-11:00 BREAK
Questions to be covered
• How can strategic communication planning help ensure/contribute to meaningful
stakeholder engagement?
• How do we go about it?
• What resources and capacities are needed?
The presentations will be followed by interactive learning activities in groups with the aim
of identifying possibilities for implementation or support of concrete cases of stakeholder
engagement related to mining in Mozambique and/or Kenya.
Guiding questions/tasks
This session is concerned with techniques and approaches used to achieve orderly closure and
successful reclamation of mines and how this should be an important part of the EIA process, as
well as an issue that is continuously addressed throughout the planning and operation of a mine.
It will include a theoretical part, and a concluding interactive part where participants apply
their new knowledge to two case study examples.
3
Considering the upcoming global meeting of the Conference of the Parties of the Convention on
Biological Diversity (CBD) in November, where mainstreaming of biodiversity in the mining sector
will be a focus area, the session will also reflect upon how biodiversity protection can be
mainstreamed throughout the mining cycle with a view to minimize impacts and achieve
successful reclamation / rehabilitation upon closure of the mine. In the generic case studies,
participants will consider the main issues of importance in ensuring orderly closure and
successful reclamation.
Learning objectives
After the session, the participants will have an improved understanding of:
• The main risks associated with closed and/or abandoned mines and how these must be
addressed.
• Practices used to minimise/avoid negative environmental impacts.
• Practices used to minimise/avoid negative social impacts.
• Tools and mechanism used to ensure that sufficient financial resources are available for
closure and rehabilitation.
Detailed session design
14:00 - 14:20 - The role of and need for the regulator
• Håkan Tarras-Wahlberg, Swedish Geological AB, discusses tools and methods the
regulator must make use of to ensure continuous rehabilitation, orderly closure and
successful reclamation of mine sites.
14:20 - 14:40 - Mainstreaming biodiversity protection
• Per Strömberg, SEPA, will reflect upon how biodiversity protection can be
mainstreamed throughout the mining cycle with a view to achieve successful
reclamation / rehabilitation upon mine closure.
• What do you think are the main environmental, social and biodiversity related
impacts/issues at this site, and what would be the effect on these of an eventual closure
of the mine?
• What authority has the main responsibility in ensuring mining reclamation and design for
closure – are there any overlaps or gaps in this regard?
• Is ongoing rehabilitation ongoing at the site? Is it required by law and if yes, is it
enforced and by whom?
4
• Do mining companies in Kenya/Mozambique place environmental bonds to cover closure
costs and if yes, how, when & where?
15:30-16:00 BREAK
19:00-21:00 DINNER
8:30-8:40 Social opening of day two and reflections of the first day
8:40-9:30 Debate: Mine community revenue allocation models, and the challenges of environmental
performance control of state owned mines
• Håkan Tarras-Wahlberg and Per Strömberg will introduce some key facts and
challenges, using real world examples, with the aim to broaden the understanding of
the issues and stimulating debate.
• Elsa Alfai from Mozambique will moderate the debate.
This session aims to give a shared understanding of the importance of monitoring the
impacts on the environment to support the supervision, management and control of mining
activities and to minimize harm to humans and the environment. The different roles and
responsibilities of the government (agencies), the private sector and the civil society will be
discussed.
The focus will be on participatory monitoring by the civil society, how this type of
monitoring can be established in practice, and how it can contribute to prevention of
conflict and building of trust. Cases from Kenya, Mozambique and Sweden will also be
presented to illustrate practices, roles and responsibilities. There will be ample time for
group discussions around important aspects of community based monitoring. One aim of the
discussions is to identify possibilities for concrete pilot projects on establishing monitoring
committees in Mozambique or Kenya.
Learning objectives
By the end of this session the participants will be able to:
• Understand the concept of community-based monitoring by environmental
committees in general
• Identify possibilities and challenges of community-based monitoring in the context of
mining activities in Mozambique and Kenya, respectively
• Make a recommendation on whether a pilot committee/project should be established
in Mozambique or Kenya
• If yes, plan some first concrete steps needed to make this project happen.
Questions to be covered
5
• How can participatory environmental monitoring committees empower citizens to
shape decision making?
• How we can they be established and how far can they go?
• How do we monitor biodiversity?
• How can environmental data be communicated?
Detailed session design
9:30 – 10:10 - The work of community-based environmental monitoring committees, their
roles in decision making on mining, and their implementation as a tool to prevent conflict
from escalating
• Flaviano Bianchini, Director of SOURCE international
10:10 - 10:25 - A Case Study of Base Titanium in Kwale wot focus on environmental
monitoring
• Georgina Jones
10:25 –10:35 - Environmental monitoring in Mozambique
• Josimar Biosse, Ministry of Land, Environment and Rural Development (MITADER),
Environmental Quality Agency (AQUA)
10:35 – 10:45 - Swedish examples of self- and community-based monitoring
• Tove Lundeberg, Swedish EPA
10:45 – 11:00 – Break
The presentations will be followed by interactive learning activities in groups with the aim
of identifying possibilities for concrete pilot cases (environmental monitoring committees) in
Mozambique and/or Kenya based on collaboration between private sector, public
administration (government) and civil society.
Guiding questions
a) Is it a conflict area?
b) Which are the major concerns from an environmental point of view?
c) Which are the major concerns from a social point of view?
d) Are there recorded human rights violations?
a) Water analysis?
b) Soil analysis?
c) Dust analysis?
d) Human Rights Impact Assessment?
6
a) Who controls the monitoring committee?
b) How can you guarantee transparency?
a) How to communicate the results of the monitoring within the community and outside
the community?
A session for preparation of concrete back to work action plans for how each agency /
organization will take action to address one or more key challenges that have been discussed in
the workshop. This should ideally also link to the 2018-19 country work plans of the EGP and the
budgets that have been allocated for activities to follow up on the ROLPAM, SESA.
Participants will work in 3 groups (two Kenyan groups; one Mozambique group) to critically
reflect on the following questions:
1. Changing context in the mining sector and how they have affected the EGP (15 min)
2. What has really changed for different EGP target groups and what these changes mean for
them? (45 min)
3. How and where the EGP has been able to contribute to these identified changes? (15 min)
4. What were the critical assumptions made at the beginning of the EGP? Are they still valid?
(15 min)
5. How should the EGP be adapted in the remaining project timeframe? (15 min)
19:00-21:00 DINNER