Sturctural Report Cold Storage

Structural Analysis and Design Report
Of
Cold Storage Building at
Rajapur Municipality
Submitted to:
Rajapur Municipality
Date: 2074/03/3
LOGO Structural Design Consultant:

Abcd Pvt. Ltd.
Baneshwor Kathmandu
Phone No. 01 4444444
email@gmail.com
www.website.com.np
Table of Contents
1. Project Detail .......................................................................................... 3
1.1 Building Design Parameters ........................................................................................ 4
1.2 Materials ...................................................................................................................... 4
1.2.1 Concrete................................................................................................................ 4
1.2.2 Reinforcement ...................................................................................................... 4
1.3 Load Calculations ........................................................................................................ 4
1.3.1 Dead Load ............................................................................................................ 4
1.3.2 Superimposed Dead Loads ................................................................................... 5
1.3.3 Live Loads ............................................................................................................ 5
1.3.4 Seismic Loads....................................................................................................... 5
1.4 Load Combination ....................................................................................................... 7
2. Structural Analysis................................................................................. 8
2.1 3D modeling of the building ........................................................................................ 8
3. Design of Elements: .............................................................................. 15
3.1.1 Sample design of Column .................................................................................. 17
3.1.2 Sample design of Beam ...................................................................................... 18
3.1.3 Sample Design of Isolated footing design .......................................................... 20
3.1.4 Combine footing ................................................................................................. 26
3.1.5 Slab Design......................................................................................................... 30
3.1.6 Design of Timber Beam ..................................................................................... 33
3.1.7 Design of Seat Angle Connection ...................................................................... 34
Structural Analysis Report of Cold Storage Building

Figure 1: Plan of Cold Storage ................................................................................................................. 3
Figure 2 :3D Modeling of the COLD STORAGE ................................................................................... 9
Figure 3: 3D Plan of COLD STORAGE ............................................................................................... 10
Figure 4: Elevation of COLD STORAGE ............................................................................................. 11
Figure 5: Story Displacement(m) along X-Direction of Cold Storage ................................................. 12
Figure 6: Story Displacement(m) along Y-Direction of Cold Storage ................................................. 12
Figure 7: Story Drift along X-Direction of Cold Storage ..................................................................... 13
Figure 8: Story Drift along Y-Direction of Cold Storage ...................................................................... 13
Figure 9: Bending Moment (KNm)along grid c-c Cold Storage due to Dead load ............................... 14
Figure 10: Shear Force(KN) Diagram along Grid c-c of Cold Storage due to Dead load ..................... 14
Figure 11: Reinforcement(mm2) from ETABS of Cold Storage –Grid c-c ........................................... 15
Figure 12: Reinforcement(mm2) from ETABS of Cold Storage of Story 1 ........................................... 16
Table 1: Live loads................................................................................................................................... 5

Table 2: Auto Seismic – IS 1893:2016 For Cold Storage ........................................................................ 6
Table 3: Load used to calculate seismic weight ....................................................................................... 7
Table 4 : Modal Mass participating ratio ............................................................................................... 11

1. Project Detail
Name of the Project :

Location :
Type of Building: The Building covers a total plinth area of 797sqm. This block has
been designed for3 numbers of storeyswith isolated footing and
combine footing
This report has been prepared as a part of the structural engineering analysis and design of
building
Figure 1: Plan of Cold Storage

1.1 Building Design Parameters
The building consists of a RCC framed structure, which is essentially an assembly of cast-
in-situ-concrete beams and columns. Floors and roof consists of cast-in-place concrete
slabs. Lateral load resisting system consists of bare frame elements only and the system
has been designed to meet the ductility requirements of IS 13920 - 1993.
For the design of the building, the Indian Standard criteria for earthquake resistant IS
1893:2016 have been referred to. According to the IS 1893:2016 Code, Nepal lies in
seismic Zone V which is the most severe seismic zone. All other factors related with the
seismic design was also adopted as for zone V of IS 1893:2016.
1.2 Materials
Following loads have been considered for the analysis and design of the building based on the
relevant Indian Standards.
1.2.1 Concrete
Concrete is to conform to IS 456: Structural use of concrete. Unless noted otherwise
concrete is to be normal-weight, with a typical dry density of 2400 kg/m3. Concrete is to
achieve the 28-day cube strength as 20 N/mm2and 25 N/mm2.
1.2.2 Reinforcement
Reinforcement bars are to be in accordance with IS 456: specification for carbon steel bars
for the reinforcement of concrete is to be in accordance with IS 1786: specification for high
deformed steel bars for the reinforcement of concrete.
The following design strengths are to be used for the design of concrete and
reinforcement.
Grade of Concrete : M25 for all columns, and M20 for all other
Grade of Rebar : High Yield Fe 500 N/mm2
Timber : Sal wood
1.3 Load Calculations

1.3.1 Dead Load
Dead loads are calculated on the basis of unit weights of the specified construction
materials in accordance with IS 875.
Reinforced concrete: 25 KN / m3
Timber: 8.65 KN/ m3
Brick work with plaster: 19 KN/m3
Sand/ cement screed: 20 KN/m2

1.3.2 Superimposed Dead Loads
Based on architectural drawing of the building, dead loads due to partition walls , floor
finish and other special purpose services has been calculated.
1.3.3 Live Loads

The Live Load for building has been adopted as given IS 875 - Part VI Section I Loads
for mercantile buildings.
Table 1: Live loads
Store 15kN/m2
Roof Live 1.5kN/m2
1.3.4 Seismic Loads

Lateral Seismic Load is computed as per IS1893:2016.
The design base shear is computed as follows:
VB = Ah * W
W=Seismic weight of the building
Ah=Z*I* (Sa/g) / (2*R)
Where,
Z = Zone factor = 0.36
I = Importance factor = 1.5
R = Response reduction factor =5
Sa/g = Average response acceleration coef. Based on nature period and
Damping of structure and soil condition at the site.
All symbols and notations in the above equation are as IS 1893: 1984.
ETABS utilizes the following procedure to generate the lateral seismic loads.
 User provides seismic zone co-efficient and desired seismic load command.
 The structural period (T) is calculated manually and input in the software.
 W is obtained from the weight data provided by the user.
The total lateral seismic load (base shear) is then distributed by the program
among different levels of the structure
 Load parameter
a. Dead Load :- as per IS 875
b. Live Load :- as per IS 875
c. Seismic Load: -as per IS1893:2016.
1. Zone Factor :-0.36 for Nepal
2. Fundamental Time Period in X direction = 0.22
3. Fundamental Time Period in Y direction = 0.17
4. Response Reduction Factor: -5

5. Soil Type: II
6. Damping:-0.05
 Method of analysis :Response Spectrum Method

 Load combination: IS1893(Part1) :2000
 Concrete design Code : IS 456 : 2000
 Ductile Detailing Code: IS 13920: 1993
 Calculation of Scale factor
Static base shear Veqx= 3503 KN

Dyanimic Base Shear Vu1= 1457 KN
Scale Factor= 2.404
Static base shear Veqy= 3503 KN

Dyanimic Base Shear Vu2= 1546 KN
Scale Factor = 2.266
Table 2: Auto Seismic –IS 1893:2016 For Cold Storage
Weight Base
Load Pattern Type Direction C Used Shear
kN kN
Eqx Seismic X 0.135 25950 3503
Eqx Seismic X + Ecc. Y 0.135 25950 3503
Eqx Seismic X - Ecc. Y 0.135 25950 3503
Eqy Seismic Y 0.135 25950 3503
Eqy Seismic Y + Ecc. X 0.135 25950 3503
Eqy Seismic Y - Ecc. X 0.135 25950 3503

1.4 Load Combination
The load combination has been taken as given IS 1893: 2016. The said code has recommended
the following load combination
 1.5 (DL + LL )
 1.2(DL + LL ± RSP)
 0.9DL ± 1.5RSP
 1.5(DL ± RSP)
Design Assumptions
Concrete Grade, M25 fck = 25 MPa for column
Concrete Grade, M20 fck = 20 MPa for other member
Steel Grade, Fe 500 fy = 500 MPa for all
The concrete has been designed using limit state method based on IS 456 –2000. The detailing
of reinforcement has been based on IS 13920 –1993 and where required Uniform Building Code
of USA has been also referred to for detailing of reinforcement.
The design has been based on the most critical load combination mentioned above.
For the above loads and load combinations, the design of beams and columns is carried out by
the ETABS.
Response Spectrum Method of Analysis was performed using IS 1893:2016 code. The design
base shear was compared with base shear computed using fundamental period.
Table 3: Load used to calculate seismic weight

Load Multiplier
DEAD 1
LIVE<=3KN/m2 0.25
LIVE>3KN/m2 0.5
WALL 1
FF 1
STAIR 1

2. Structural Analysis
The analysis and design have been carried out using software called ETABS v16.2, which is a
special purpose computer program developed specifically for building structures. It provides
the Structural Engineer with all the tools necessary to create, modify, analyze, design, and
optimize the structural elements in a building model. The building geometry based on
architectural drawings been generated using above named software. The dead load, live load
and lateral loads were supplied to the digital models as per standard code of practices. Several
analysis run were performed to achieve the best result to meet the design and service
requirements.
For the analysis, following loading parameters were considered:
i. Self-weight of the frames and slabs
ii. Floor finishing dead loads
iii. Fixed wall loads as per architectural drawings
iv. Staircase load
v. Partition wall loads as per architectural drawings only.
vi. Live loads
2.1 3D modeling of the building

i. 3D model of the building
ii. Plan of the building
iii. Elevation of the building

Figure 2 :3D Modeling of the COLD STORAGE

Figure 3: 3D Plan of COLD STORAGE

Figure 4: Elevation of COLD STORAGE
Table 4 : Modal Mass participating ratio

Sum Sum
Case Mode Period UX UY UX UY
sec
Modal 1 0.77 0.7992 0.0048 0.7992 0.0048
Modal 2 0.729 0.0283 0.5672 0.8275 0.572
Modal 3 0.694 0.0151 0.2788 0.8426 0.8508
Modal 4 0.319 0.003 0.0002 0.8455 0.851
Modal 5 0.314 0.0008 0.0048 0.8464 0.8558
Modal 6 0.292 8.446E-06 0.0019 0.8464 0.8577
Modal 7 0.275 0.0151 0.0022 0.8615 0.8598
Modal 8 0.272 0.0002 0.0132 0.8617 0.873
Modal 9 0.266 0.1069 0.0023 0.9685 0.8753
Modal 10 0.251 0.0032 0.0782 0.9718 0.9535
Modal 11 0.244 0.0016 0.0265 0.9734 0.98
Modal 12 0.224 0.0026 1.428E-06 0.976 0.98

Figure 5: Story Displacement(m) along X-Direction of Cold Storage
Figure 6: Story Displacement(m) along Y-Direction of Cold Storage

Figure 7: Story Drift along X-Direction of Cold Storage
Figure 8: Story Drift along Y-Direction of Cold Storage

Figure 9: Bending Moment (KNm)along grid c-cCold Storage due to Dead load
Figure 10: Shear Force(KN) Diagram along Grid c-c of Cold Storage due to Dead load

3. Design of Elements:
The design of all structural elements is done using ‘Limit State Method’. All relevant Limit
State is considered in design to ensure adequate safety and serviceability.
The design includes design for durability, construction and use in service should be considered
as a whole. The realization of design objectives requires compliance with clearly defined
standards for materials, production, workmanship, and also maintenance and use of structure in
service.
This section includes all the design process of sample calculation for a single element as
column, beam, slab and foundation.
Figure 11: Reinforcement(mm2) from ETABS of Cold Storage –Grid c-c

Figure 12: Reinforcement(mm2) from ETABS of Cold Storage of Story 1

3.1.1 Sample design of Column
EETABS 2016 Concrete Frame Design
IS 456:2000 Column Section Design
Column Element Details Type: Ductile Frame (Summary)

Level Element Unique Name Section ID Combo ID Station Loc Length (mm) LLRF
Story1 C55 83 Column 500x500 DCon20 0 4000 0.802
Section Properties
b (mm) h (mm) dc (mm) Cover (Torsion) (mm)
500 500 60 30
Material Properties
Ec (MPa) fck (MPa) Lt.Wt Factor (Unitless) fy (MPa) fys (MPa)
25000 25 1 500 500
Design Code Parameters

ɣC ɣS
1.5 1.15
Axial Force and Biaxial Moment Design For Pu , Mu2 , Mu3

Design Pu Design Mu2 Design Mu3 Minimum M2 Minimum M3 Rebar Area Rebar %
N N-mm N-mm N-mm N-mm mm² %
356410.04 -432412107 121533432.94 8363755.7 8363755.7 6302 2.52
Axial Force and Biaxial Moment Factors

K Factor Length Initial Moment Additional Moment Minimum Moment
Unitless mm N-mm N-mm N-mm
Major Bend(M3) 0.751541 3400 56563195.15 0 8363755.7
Minor Bend(M2) 0.674004 3400 -172964843 0 8363755.7
Shear Design for Vu2 , Vu3

Shear Vu Shear Vc Shear Vs Shear Vp Rebar Asv /s
N N N N mm²/mm
Major, Vu2 158615.94 201083.71 88000.38 158615.94 0.55
Minor, Vu3 255973.16 201083.71 88000.38 255973.16 0.55
Joint Shear Check/Design

Joint Shear Shear Shear Shear Joint Shear
Force VTop Vu,Tot Vc Area Ratio
N N N N mm² Unitless
Major Shear, Vu2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Minor Shear, Vu3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
(1.1) Beam/Column Capacity Ratio

Major Ratio Minor Ratio
N/A N/A
Additional Moment Reduction Factor k (IS 39.7.1.1)

Ag Asc Puz Pb Pu k
mm² mm² N N N Unitless
250000 6301.8 5175671.01 1393125.34 356410.04 1
Additional Moment (IS 39.7.1)

Consider Length Section KL/Depth KL/Depth KL/Depth Ma
Ma Factor Depth (mm) Ratio Limit Exceeded Moment (N-mm)
Major Bending (M3 ) Yes 0.85 500 5.11 12 No 0
Minor Bending (M2 ) Yes 0.85 500 4.583 12 No 0
Notes:
N/A: Not Applicable
N/C: Not Calculated
N/N: Not Needed
3.1.2 Sample design of Beam

ETABS 2016 Concrete Frame Design

IS 456:2000 Beam Section Design
Beam Element Details Type: Ductile Frame (Summary)

Level Element Unique Name Section ID Combo ID Station Loc Length (mm) LLRF
Story1 B73 166 Beam 400x600 DCon5 5750 6000 1
Section Properties
b (mm) h (mm) bf (mm) ds (mm) dct (mm) dcb (mm)
400 600 400 0 32 32
Material Properties
Ec (MPa) fck (MPa) Lt.Wt Factor (Unitless) fy (MPa) fys (MPa)
22360.68 20 1 500 500
Design Code Parameters

ɣC ɣS
1.5 1.15
Factored Forces and Moments

Factored Factored Factored Factored
Mu3 Tu Vu2 Pu
N-mm N-mm N N
-586566790 2.84 418902.46 -45988.34
Design Moments, Mu3& Mt

Factored Factored Positive Negative
Moment Mt Moment Moment
N-mm N-mm N-mm N-mm
-586566790 4.18 0 -586566794
Design Moment and Flexural Reinforcement for Moment, Mu3&Tu

Design Design -Moment +Moment Minimum Required
-Moment +Moment Rebar Rebar Rebar Rebar
N-mm N-mm mm² mm² mm² mm²
Top (+2 Axis) -586566794 2939 53 2939 735
Bottom (-2 Axis) 0 1469 53 267 1469
Shear Force and Reinforcement for Shear, Vu2&Tu

Shear Ve Shear Vc Shear Vs Shear Vp Rebar Asv /s
N N N N mm²/mm
564238.26 154198.18 410040.11 254232.33 2
Torsion Force and Torsion Reinforcement for Torsion, Tu& VU2

Tu Vu Core b1 Core d1 Rebar Asvt /s
N-mm N mm mm mm²/mm
6.81 417853.81 356 556 0
3.1.3 Sample Design of Isolated footing design
Load
Input Combination: 1.5DL + 1.5LL
Width along x, a 500 mm x-direction
Width along y, b 500 mm y-direction
Pu Mux(kN Muy
Grade of concrete,fck = 20 N/mm2 (kN) m) (kNm)

Grade of steel, fy = 500 N/mm2 1182 55 -5
P Mx(kN My
Clear cover 50 mm (kN) m) (kNm)
788.0
Safe bearing pressure 120 kN/m2 0 36.67 -3.33
Norma
ey =
Loading condition l 0.047 m
Safe bearing pressure for given loading 120 kN/m2 ex = -0.004 m
Quick Check
Calculated length 2.69 m Suggested Length 2.7 m (X-dimension)
Calculated width 2.69 m Suggested width 2.7 m (Y-dimension)
Pressure at corner points
(-1.35,1.35) (1.35,1.35) 118.2
at = 119 OK at = 5 OK
(-1.35,-1.35) (1.35,-
at = 97.93 OK at 1.35) = 95.90 OK
Check for bearing
OK SAFE
Check for development length: pressure:
Check for X-direction Check for Y-direction
Required d for moment 200.96 mm Required d for moment 199
Provide
500.00 500.00
Provide D mm D
Diameter of bars 12 mm Diameter of bars 12
Calculated
191 195
Calculated Spacing mm Spacing
Provided spacing 150 mm Provided spacing 150
Check for two way shear SAFE Check for two way shear SAFE
Check for one way shear SAFE Check for one way shear SAFE
Calculations
Area of footing required, LB 7.22 m2
a-b = 0 mm
𝐿2 − (𝑎 − 𝑏)𝐿 − 𝐿𝐵 = 0 Ref. S.N
Sinha
Provi
L= 2.69 m de 2.7 m
Provi
B= 2.69 m de 2.7 m
Area provided = 7.29 m2

Moment of Inertia about X axix, Ix = 4.43 m4
Moment of Inertia about Y axix, Iy = 4.43 m4
𝑃 𝑀𝑦 𝑀𝑥
𝑝 =Building
Structural Analysis Report of Cold Storage + 𝑥+ 𝑦
𝐴 𝐼 𝑥 𝐼 𝑦
Stress at any point is given by,
y=-
At x = -L/2 = -1.35 B/2 = -1.35 p= 97.93 kN/m2 OK
y=-
x = L/2 = 1.35 B/2 = -1.35 p= 95.90 kN/m2 OK
y = B/2 118.2
x = L/2 = 1.35 = 1.35 p= 5 kN/m2 OK
y = B/2 119.1
x = -L/2 = -1.35 = 1.35 p= 0 kN/m2 OK
Calculation for X-direction
178.64 (Factored upward pressure)

177.3
8 kN/m2
1.60 m 1.10 m
177.90
Bending moment at critical section 107.42 kN-m/m at face of the column

Reinforcement index 0.133
Minimum depth, d 201 mm
approx three times calculated
Provide overall depth, D 500 mm value
Assume diameter of bar 12 mm
Effective depth d 432 mm
0.5755
9
591.93
Ast required 8 mm2
Ast minimum 518.4 mm2
Provi
Spacing 191.06 mm de 150 mm c/c

and
Area of steel provided 753.98 mm2 pt = 0.17%
Provide 12 mm dia bars @ 150 mm c/c at bottom (Parallel to X)
Check for two way shear:

The critical section for the two way Critical Section in two way shear
shear occurs at a distance of d/2 from
2
the face of the column
a+d = 932 mm 1.5
b+d = 932 mm 1
2
Punching area = 0.87 m 0.5
Punching perimeter = 3.728 m 0
-2.00 -1.00 0.00 1.00 2.00
-0.5
Factored pressure at corners
-1
at (-0.466,-0.466) = 156.88 kN/m2
-1.5
at (0.466,-0.466) = 155.83 kN/m2
-2
at (0.466,0.466) = 167.40 kN/m2
at (-0.466,0.466) = 168.45 kN/m2
Average factored upward pressure = 162.14 kN/m2
Punching shear force = Factored load - factored upward pressure x punching area
1041.1
6 kN
Therefore, Nominal punching shear 𝜏𝑣 = Ref. IS 456: 2000, Cl.
stress, 0.65 N/mm2 31.6.1
Allowable shear stress = 1.12 N/mm2 SAFE

Where, ks = 𝑘𝑠 𝜏𝑐 1
𝜏𝑐 =
1.12 N/mm2
Check for one way shear:

The critical section for one way shear occurs at a distance "d" from the face of the column.
= 0.668 m from edge of the fooring
177.69
Factored upward stress at that point = 4 kN/m2
177.53
Average upward stress 8 kN/m2
320.20
Total shear force along the critical section = 7 kN
Nominal shear stress 0.27 N/mm2
Percentage of steel, pt 0.17%

= 13.48
Design shear stress, = 0.31 N/mm2

SAFE
Calculation for Y-
direction
146.90 (Factored upward pressure)

178.6
4 kN/m2
1.60 m 1.10 m
165.71
Bending moment at critical section 105.47 kN-m/m at face of the column

0.565
580.81
Ast required 4 mm2
Provi
Spacing 194.72 mm de 150 mm c/c
and
Area of steel provided 753.98 mm2 pt = 0.17%
Check for two way shear: Critical Section in two way shear
2
Structural Analysis Report of Cold Storage Building 1.5
0.5
The critical section for the two way
shear occurs at a distance of d/2 from
the face of the column
a+d = 932 mm
b+d = 932 mm
Punching area = 0.87 m2
Punching perimeter = 3.728 m
Factored pressure at corners

at (-0.466,-0.466) = 156.88 kN/m2
at (0.466,-0.466) = 155.83 kN/m2
at (0.466,0.466) = 167.40 kN/m2
at (-0.466,0.466) = 168.45 kN/m2
Average factored upward pressure = 162.14 kN/m2
Punching shear force = Factored load - factored upward pressure x punching area
1041.1
6 kN
Therefore, Nominal punching shear
stress, 𝜏𝑣 =0.65 N/mm2
Ref. IS 456: 2000, Cl.
Allowable shear stress = 1.12 N/mm2 SAFE 31.6.1
𝜏𝑐 =
1.12 N/mm2

The critical section for one way shear occurs at a distance "d" from
the face of the column.
= 0.668 m from edge of the fooring
170.78
174.71
Average upward stress 6 kN/m2
315.11
Total shear force along the critical section = 8 kN
= 13.48

Design shear stress, = 0.31 N/mm2
SAFE
Check for development Length
Sufficient development length should be available for the reinforcement from the critical section.
434.78
𝜏𝑏𝑑 = 1.92 N/mm2 3 N/mm2
Ld = 679 mm 𝜎𝑠 =
The total length available from the critical section = 0.5(L - a)- Cover 1050 mm
OK
Check for bearing stress
2
A1 = 7.29 m2
A2 = 0.25 m2 = 18 N/mm2
N/m
SAFE
4.73 m2
3.1.4 Combine footing

Load
Input Combination: 2) 1.5DL + 1.5LL
x-
directio
Width along x, a F1 500 mm F2 500 mm n

y-
directio
Width along y, b F1 500 mm F2 500 mm n
Mux(k Muy
Pu (kN)
Grade of concrete,fck = 20 N/mm2 Nm) (kNm)
Grade of steel, fy = 500 N/mm2 F1 2548.13 4.4 -0.8
Clear cover 50 mm F2 2539.27 5 -1.5
Mx(kN My
P (kN)
Safe bearing pressure 120 kN/m2 m) (kNm)
Norm
Loading condition al F1 1699 2.93 -0.53
3.3333
Safe bearing pressure for given loading 120 kN/m2 F2 1693 33 -1
ey = 0.002 m
ex = 0.000 m
Footing
Size:
a= 3.30 m
b= 3.30 m
P1 P2 c= 1.50 m
d= 6.00 m
a e= 1.5 m
Length,
b
L= 9 m
c d e
2
Area of footing 29.7 m
Total load, P1+P2 3392 kN Working load
Average soil pressure 114 kN/m2 OK

Centroid of load from left edge of
footing 4.49 m
Centroid of combined footing 4.50 m
Moment of inertia about centroidal y- 133.6
axis, Iyg 5 m4
Moment about y axis, My = Pe -17.72 kNm
Soil pressure at two ends
𝑃 𝑀𝑦 113.5 Right
𝑝= ± 𝑥 987 end OK
𝐴 𝐼𝑦

114.7 Left
919 End OK
Check for X-direction
Required d for moment 467.82 mm
Provide D 600.00 mm
Diameter of bars 16 mm
Calculated Spacing 224 mm
Provided spacing 150 mm OK
Check for two way shear SAFE
Check for one way shear SAFE
Design for Bending Moment

2548.
13 kN 2539.27 kN
Width of footing at:

P1, a': 3.30 m
P2, b': 3.30 m
171 kN
4.5
Distance of zero SF, x: 1 m 1.50 m 6.00 m 1.5 m
Width at zero shear force, -1921

w= 3.30 m
SF at w width:
636 kNm 636 kNm
BMD
848 1691 kN
1700 kN 848 kN
x= 14.88 m
SFD
kNm-
Maximum sagging Bending Moment 193 m for bottom reinforcement
for top
Maximum hogging Bending Moment 582.1 kNm reinforcement

582.1
Bending moment at critical section 5 kN-m
2.104
072
2961.
Ast required 148 mm2
Provid
Spacing 224.07 mm e 150 mm c/c
4423.3 and pt
Area of steel provided mm2
6 = 0.25%
Check for two way shear:

The critical section for the two way shear occurs at a distance of d/2 from the face of the
column
Check for Column with larger force
102
a+d = 6 mm
102
b+d = 6 mm
1.0
Punching area = 5 m2
4.1
Punching perimeter = 04 m
Average factored upward pressure = 171 kN/m2

Punching shear force = Factored load - factored upward pressure x punching
area
2367.
814 kN
Therefore, Nominal punching 𝜏𝑣 =
shear stress, 1.10 N/mm2 Ref. IS 456: 2000, Cl. 31.6.1
N/mm
Allowable shear stress = 1.12 2 SAFE

𝜏𝑐 = N/mm
2
1.12

The critical section for one way shear occurs at a distance "d" from the face of the
column.
= 0.75 m from edge of the footing
Total shear force along the critical 423.9
section = 5 kN
= 9.23
Design shear
stress, = 0.36 N/mm2 SAFE
3.1.5 Slab Design

1. DESIGN DATA
Longer Span of the critical Slab (Ly) = 6.00 m

Shorter Span of the critical Slab (Lx)= 5.00 m
Grade of Concrete used (σck) = 20 N/mm2
Width of slab, b = 1000 mm
Grade of steel used (σy) = 500 N/mm2
Unit weight of Marble= 27 kN/m3
Unit weight of screed = 20.4 kN/m3
Unit weight of plaster = 20.4 kN/m3
Thickness of screed = 25 mm
Thickness of plaster = 12.5 mm
Assume Thickness of slab (D) = 150 mm
Effective depth of slab d= 130 mm
2. BENDING MOMENT COEFFICIENT
Type of slab Panal = 2 Adjescent Edge Discontinous

Aspect Ratio of the slab Considered Ly/Lx = 1.200 30
Bending Moment Coefficient for 1.2 for 1.2 for 1.200
Coeff for -ve moment, βx = 0.0600 0.0600 0.060
Coeff for +ve moment, βx = 0.0450 0.0450 0.045
Coeff for -ve moment, βy = 0.0470 0.047
Coeff for +ve moment, βy = 0.0350 0.035
3. LOAD CALCULATION
Dead load of slab = 3.75 kN/m2

Dead load due to screed = 0.51 kN/m2
Dead load due to plaster = 0.255 kN/m2
Dead load due to Partition Wall = 1.5 kN/m2
Live load at Slab = 3 kN/m2
Total Load = 9.015 kN/m2
Factored Design Load = 13.5225 kN/m2
Factored Design Load per meter = 13.5225 kN/m
4. MOMENT CALCULATION
Design -ve moment for short span, Mx 20.3 kN-m

Design +ve moment for short span, Mx 15.2 kN-m
Design -ve moment for long span, My 15.9 kN-m

Design +ve moment for long span, My 11.8 kN-m
5. CALCULATION OF REINFORCEMENT
Design for -ve Reinforcement =

Along Short span 387.6 mm2
Along Long span 298.1 mm2
Design for +ve Reinforcement =
Along Short span 284.6 mm2
Along Long span 218.4 mm2
Minimum reinforcement required (Ast)= 225.0 mm2
Area Spacing Area

Bar dia. Spacing
Direction Required Required provided
Provided mm Provided mm
mm2 mm mm2
Shorter
Support 8 388 125.00 150 334.93
Shorter Mid 8 285 176.53 150 334.93

Longer
Support 8 298 168.56 150 334.93
Longer Mid 8 218 223.29 150 334.93
6. CHECK FOR SHEAR
Shear coefficient = 0.60

Design Shear Force Vu = 40.57 kN
Nominal shear stress (tv) = 0.31 N/mm2
Percent tension steel (Pt) = 0.22 N/mm2
Shear strength of M20 Concrete and 0.22% steel tc = 0.34 N/mm2
Shear Strength Coefficient for(d<=150) ks = 1.30 N/mm2
Shear strength in slab t'c = 0.44 N/mm2
Maximum Shear stress for M20 Grade Concrete tc, max = 2.80 N/mm2
Safe in shear
7. CHECK FOR DEFLECTION:
Required Tension reinforcement % for short span Pt= 0.12

Provided Tension reinforcement % for short span Pt= 0.22
Basic value of span to effective depth (L/d) ) ratio α = 26
Modification factor for span > 10m β = 1
Mu/bd2= 0.90
Steel stress of service fs= 246.41
Required modification factor for tension reinforcement 1.48
Actual Modification factor for tension reinforcement =γ 1.62
Allowable short span to effective depth ratio Lx/d = 42.05
Calculated short span to effective depth ratio (Lx/d) = 38.46
Safe in deflection
3.1.6 Design of Timber Beam

Spacing of secondary beam = 1.5 m
Span of Timber beam = 1.27 m
Live load on from IS 875(Part II) = 15 KN/m2
Unit Weight = 8.65 KN/m3
Modulus of Elasticity = 1270 KN/cm2
Assuming 5cm x 10 cm sal wood beam placed at 10 cm center to center.
Dead load of timber beam = 0.05 x 0.1 x 8.65
= 0.044 KN
Live load on timber beam = 0.1 x 15
= 1.5 KN/m
Total load = 1.544 KN/m = 0.01544KN/cm
Bending moment = wl2/8
= 0.31KNm = 31KNcm
Shear force = wl/2
= 0.98 KN
Permissible stress in bending = 1.68 KN /cm2
Permissible stress in Shear = 0.09 KN /cm2
Permissible deflection = L/360 =.0.41 cm
Check for Bending stress

Section modulus = bd2/6
= 83.33 cm3
Bending stress = M/Z
= 0.511 KN /cm2<1.68 KN /cm2 Safe
Check for Shear stress

Area of section = bd
= 50 cm2
Shear stress = 1.5V/A
= 0.03 KN /cm2 <0.09 KN /cm2 Safe
Check for Deflection

Moment of Inertia = bd3/12
= 416.67
5 𝑤𝑙 4
Maximum deflection =
384 𝐸𝐼
= 0.096 cm < 0.409 cm Safe
3.1.7 Design of Seat Angle Connection

Total Dead Load on 5.625 x 1.270m panel = 107.15 KN
Total Live load on 5. 625 x 1.270m panel = 6.11 KN
Total load on 5.625 x 1.270m panel = 113.26 KN
Factored load = 170 KN
End Reaction = 170/2 KN
= 85 KN
Adopt 65 x 65 x 8 mm Angle section for seat angle.
85 KN load is uniformly distributed over 0.065 m length.
Weight per 5.265 m length = 1308 KN/m2
Factored Bending moment = wl2/2
= 2.8 KNm
𝑓𝑦
Moment capacity of angle leg = 1.2𝑍𝑒 𝛾
𝑚𝑜
= 16 KNm > 2.8 KNm Safe

𝑓𝑦
Shear Capacity of seating leg = 𝐵𝑡𝑎
√3𝛾𝑚0
= 5904 KN > 85 KN Safe
Design of Connection
Let us provide 12 mm diameter 4.6 grade bolts.
Bolt will be in single shear and bearing.
Stress area of bolt, Anb = 83.3 mm2
𝑓𝑦
Strength of bolt in single Shear = 𝐴𝑛𝑏
√3𝛾𝑚𝑏
= 15.89 KN
Number of Bolts required = 85/15.89
=6
Provide 12mm diameter bolts of grade 4.6 at 100 mm spacing in single row.

Sturctural Report Cold Storage

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Sturctural Report Cold Storage

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Structural Analysis and Design Report

LOGO Structural Design Consultant:

Structural Analysis Report of Cold Storage Building

Table 1: Live loads................................................................................................................................... 5

Structural Analysis Report of Cold Storage Building

Name of the Project :

Figure 1: Plan of Cold Storage

Structural Analysis Report of Cold Storage Building

1.3 Load Calculations

Structural Analysis Report of Cold Storage Building

1.3.3 Live Loads

1.3.4 Seismic Loads

Structural Analysis Report of Cold Storage Building

 Method of analysis :Response Spectrum Method

Static base shear Veqx= 3503 KN

Static base shear Veqy= 3503 KN

Table 2: Auto Seismic –IS 1893:2016 For Cold Storage

Structural Analysis Report of Cold Storage Building

Table 3: Load used to calculate seismic weight

Structural Analysis Report of Cold Storage Building

For the analysis, following loading parameters were considered:

i. Self-weight of the frames and slabs

ii. Floor finishing dead loads

iii. Fixed wall loads as per architectural drawings

iv. Staircase load

v. Partition wall loads as per architectural drawings only.

vi. Live loads

2.1 3D modeling of the building

Structural Analysis Report of Cold Storage Building

Structural Analysis Report of Cold Storage Building

Structural Analysis Report of Cold Storage Building

Table 4 : Modal Mass participating ratio

Structural Analysis Report of Cold Storage Building

Figure 6: Story Displacement(m) along Y-Direction of Cold Storage

Structural Analysis Report of Cold Storage Building

Figure 8: Story Drift along Y-Direction of Cold Storage

Structural Analysis Report of Cold Storage Building

Structural Analysis Report of Cold Storage Building

Figure 11: Reinforcement(mm2) from ETABS of Cold Storage –Grid c-c

Structural Analysis Report of Cold Storage Building

Structural Analysis Report of Cold Storage Building

Column Element Details Type: Ductile Frame (Summary)

Design Code Parameters

Axial Force and Biaxial Moment Design For Pu , Mu2 , Mu3

Axial Force and Biaxial Moment Factors

Shear Design for Vu2 , Vu3

Joint Shear Check/Design

Structural Analysis Report of Cold Storage Building

(1.1) Beam/Column Capacity Ratio

Additional Moment Reduction Factor k (IS 39.7.1.1)

Additional Moment (IS 39.7.1)

3.1.2 Sample design of Beam

Structural Analysis Report of Cold Storage Building

Beam Element Details Type: Ductile Frame (Summary)

Design Code Parameters

Factored Forces and Moments

Design Moments, Mu3& Mt

Design Moment and Flexural Reinforcement for Moment, Mu3&Tu

Shear Force and Reinforcement for Shear, Vu2&Tu

Structural Analysis Report of Cold Storage Building

Torsion Force and Torsion Reinforcement for Torsion, Tu& VU2

3.1.3 Sample Design of Isolated footing design

Structural Analysis Report of Cold Storage Building

Area provided = 7.29 m2