Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ryan Love
Psych 645
Personality is the distinctive patterns of opinions, emotional state, and actions that make
each person unique (Cervone & Pervin, 2010, p. 8). It matures within individuals and relics
constant throughout one’s life. People evaluate and define the personalities of others around
them, and usually people do not understand they are doing it. Detecting how and why people act
the way they do is no different from what a personality psychologist does. Though, informal
more on origins of character, which applies to everyone. Over the years, personality research has
exposed many theories to help explain how and why certain personality traits develop.
To define personality one must understand exactly what the term personality means.
According to Cervone and Pervin (2010), “Personality refers to psychological qualities that
behaving” (p. 8). Enduring means the quality that appears to be consistent overtime and in
different situations of an individual’s life (Cervone & Pervin, 2010). People change overtime and
their behaviors do as well in different situations. “The introvert at one period in life turns out to
While some introverts in certain social situations become extrovert in other situations
(Cervone & Pervin, 2010). A personality psychologist’s job is to distinguish and explain patterns
of an individual’s psychological functioning, and the observed patterns that stick out overtime
and during certain situations (Cervone & Pervin, 2010). Distinctive is when personality
psychology focus on the psychological factors that separates individual’s from one another
(Cervone & Pervin, 2010). For example, an individual is not going to say they feel angry when
SCIENTIFIC STUDY OF PERSONALITY PAPER 3
things do not go his or her way, but feel good when things go his or her way. Contribute to
means that personality psychologist’s look for psychological aspects that remotely influence and
attempts to explain a person’s “distinctive and enduring tendencies” (Cervone & Pervin, 2010, p.
8).
a particular individual in different situations” (Cervone & Pervin, 2010, p. 8). Personality
psychological aspects that “contribute to the patterns of development, individual differences, and
individual behavior that are observed” (Cervone & Pervin, 2010, p. 8). The goal of a personality
including both patterns characteristic of all people and those idiosyncratic to the individual”
(Cervone & Pervin, 2010, p. 8). When personality psychologists say “feeling, thinking, and
behaving it means that the notion of personality is comprehensive; it refers to all aspects of
persons: their mental life, their emotional experiences, and their social behavior” (Cervone &
Pervin, 2010, p. 9). Personality psychologists have a difficult job and aim to understand the
closely. Psychologists use case studies so they can obtain all aspects of human personality.
During a case study, the psychologist has sufficient contact with the client while developing “an
understanding of the psychological structures and processes that are most important to that
individual’s personality” (Cervone & Pervin, 2010, p 9). Case studies are considered
SCIENTIFIC STUDY OF PERSONALITY PAPER 4
“idiographic methods, in that the goal is to obtain a psychological portrait of the particular
individual under study” (Cervone & Pervin, 2010, p. 45). Case studies allow psychologists to
observe the person’s personality during situations (Cervone & Pervin, 2010).
Correlational Designs
Correlation coefficient measures the degree in which two variables go together (Cervone
& Pervin, 2010). According to Cervone and Pervin (2010), “A correlation coefficient is a
number that reflects the degree to which two measures are linearly related” (p.48). When a
person scores higher on variable I may score higher on variable II, this means that person is
positively correlated (Cervone & Pervin, 2010). A negative correlation is when a person scores
higher on variable I than variable II (Cervone & Pervin, 2010). However, if the two variables do
not go together in a systematic linear way then they are uncorrelated (Cervone & Pervin, 2010).
manipulated” (Cervone & Pervin, 2010, p. 48). Sometimes researchers have to use more
complicated statistical strategies to “determine whether two variables are related, even after
controlling for the influence of some other variables” (Cervone & Pervin, 2010, p. 49).
According to Cervone and Pervin (2010), “Even if such alternative approaches to analyzing data
are used, one would still have a correlational research strategy if one is looking at the relation
among variables without manipulating these variables experimentally” (p. 49). People with
higher levels of positive emotions appear to live longer (Cervone & Pervin, 2010). The most
common test is questionnaires, which are used first to get an idea of an individual’s personality
Controlled experiments are when participants are randomly placed “to an experimental
condition” (Cervone & Pervin, 2010, p. 50). The experiment consists of different” conditions
that manipulate one or more variables of interest” (Cervone & Pervin, 2010, p. 50). According to
Cervone and Pervin (2010), “Random assignment assures that there is no systematic relationship
(p. 52). If individuals placed in different situations act different after the experimental
manipulation, even though the individuals were the same before, then manipulation was the
cause (Cervone & Pervin, 2010, p. 53). The indicated research strategy where variables are
Each method is different and each has their own unique way of measuring personality.
Case studies primary advantage is “that they are conducted in clinical settings they overcome the
potential superficiality and artificiality of correlational and experimental methods” (Cervone &
Pervin, 2010, p. 55). During a case study, the experimenter learns a great deal of important
aspects of a person’s life that may not occur appear in a short experiment or a survey
questionnaire (Cervone & Pervin, 2010, p. 55). The experimenter performing the case study can
observe how the applicant thinks and feels about situations (Cervone & Pervin, 2010). The
experimenter observes “the behavior of interest directly and does not have to extrapolate from a
somewhat artificial setting to the real world” (Cervone & Pervin, 2010, p. 55).
Another benefit “is that clinical research may be the only feasible way of studying some
phenomena” (Cervone & Pervin, 2010, p. 55). When clinician’s must inquire a study’s all factors
organization of personality, in-depth case studies may be the only option’ (Cervone & Pervin,
2010, p. 55).
The limitations of a case study method have two problems: First, evidence from a case
study does not apply to all people, and second, a case study method “does not provide evidence
that one psychological process casually influences another” (Cervone & Pervin, 2010, p. 56).
The second limitation is identifying causes. Researchers set out to find the causes of the
phantasm the researcher’s study (Cervone & Pervin, 2010). Case studies do not provide a valid
casual explanation (Cervone & Pervin, 2010, p. 56). Case studies are also just a reflection of
what researchers believe, rather than trusting the objective measurement strategies, and
researchers rely on impressionistic reports (Cervone & Pervin, 2010). Two researchers
conducting the same test are more than likely to have two different outcomes, and this decreases
the validity of case studies evidence (Cervone & Pervin, 2010). Verbal reports are also
Correlational research and questionnaires strengths and advantages are that researchers
can study larger groups of people (Cervone & Pervin, 2010). The Internet makes it easier for
researchers because now surveys can be put on the Internet and more people can participate. This
allows psychologists to gather more information from a larger diverse group of people (Cervone
& Pervin, 2010). The second advantage is reliability. Most questionnaires have exceptionally
reliable evidence of the psychological aspects they are designed to measure (Cervone & Pervin,
2010). According to Cervone and Pervin (2010), “This is important in that the reliability of the
tests is necessary to detect important features of personality that might be overlooked if one
However, correlation studies also have their limitations, such as providing superficial
information about a person (Cervone & Pervin, 2010). “A correlational study will provide
information about an individual’s scores on the various personality tests that happen to have been
used in research” (Cervone & Pervin, 2010, p. 58). The second limitation is similar to a case
study, “in a correlational study it is difficult to draw firm conclusions about causality” (Cervone
& Pervin, 2010, p. 58). The third limitation is when people participate in questionnaires they
tend to be biased when describing themselves, and this is referred to as response style (Cervone
& Pervin, 2010). Laboratory research is artificial and limited to specific contexts (Cervone &
Pervin, 2010).
Psychologists believe that what may work in the laboratory may not work in other areas,
even though there are relationships between isolated variables visible, this may not play a role in
the complexity of human behavior (Cervone & Pervin, 2010). Laboratory studies usually involve
little exposures to stimuli, and could miss crucial processes that are displayed over time
(Cervone & Pervin, 2010). Social psychology of research looks at the factors influencing
behaviors in humans that are not part of the experimental design (Cervone & Pervin, 2010).
According to Cervone and Pervin (2010), “Among such factors may be cues implicit in the
experimental setting that suggest to the subject that the experimenter has a certain hypothesis
and, “in the interest of science,” the subject behaves in a way that will confirm it” (p. 60). The
objective and essence provided to the study may differ from one participant to the other “in ways
that are not part of the experimental design and thereby serve to reduce both reliability and
Experimenters can make mistakes that could influence the study without knowing it, the
experimenter could mistakenly make an error in data, or discharge cues to the participants, which
SCIENTIFIC STUDY OF PERSONALITY PAPER 8
influences their behavior in a certain way (Cervone & Pervin, 2010). This causes the participant
to behave accordingly with the hypothesis (Cervone & Pervin, 2010). Some defend the
laboratory experiments because they believe that research is the correct foundation for testing
casual hypotheses (Cervone & Pervin, 2010). Some phenomena’s are not discovered outside the
laboratory, and there is little theoretical “support for the contention that subjects typically try to
confirm the experimenter’s hypothesis or for the significance of experimental artifacts more
generally” (Cervone & Pervin, 2010, p. 61). One limitation is that some phenomena cannot be
composed in the laboratory (Cervone & Pervin, 2010). “A personality theory may make
predictions about people’s emotional reactions to extreme levels of stress or their thoughts about
highly personal matters” (Cervone & Pervin, 2010, p. 61). This is unethical, exposing
Conclusion
Scientific studies have several ways of measuring personality. How the researcher
chooses to conduct a test is important to achieve reliability and validity within the test.
Psychologists must know the strengths and limitations when assessing the alternative approaches
to research. Some tests results may assist in another approach. Research methods can coincide
with other research, and data from alternative research procedures can be considered in the
Reference
Cervone, D., & Pervin, L. A. (2010). Personality: Theory and research (11th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: