You are on page 1of 11

JOURNAL OF RESEARCH ON ADOLESCENCE, 25(4), 728–738

Body Image Disturbances and Predictors of Body Dissatisfaction Among


Hispanic and White Preadolescents
Norma Olvera, Kendall McCarley, Augusto X. Rodriguez, Nausheen Noor, and
Marıa A. Hernandez-Valero
University of Houston

This study assessed ethnic and gender differences in ideal body size, body dissatisfaction (BD), and the relationship
between BD and various predictors (e.g., body composition indicators and cardiorespiratory fitness). The sample con-
sisted of 190 White and Hispanic preadolescents aged 10–13 years. Demographic, percent body fat (%BF), body mass
index (BMI), body image variables, and cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) were examined. A significant Gender 9 Ethnic-
ity interaction was found for ideal body size (p < .05), with Hispanic girls preferring the thinnest figures and Hispanic
boys the largest figures, compared to their counterparts. No significant gender or ethnic differences in BD were
observed. After controlling for demographic and cultural variables, increased %BF and BMI scores predicted greater
BD, whereas CRF did not.

Despite the increased societal pressure for thinness Ethnicity is an important factor to consider when
in the United States (Myers & Crowther, 2007), the investigating body image issues in American youth,
obesity rate among American children and adoles- given that preferred ideal body size and body size
cents has tripled in past decades (Ogden, Carroll, satisfaction levels are thought to be culturally
Curtin, Lamb, & Flegal, 2012). This dilemma may bound. Hispanic children and adolescents growing
lead youth to feel dissatisfied with their body size up in the United States are of great interest because
and engage in unhealthy weight control behaviors, they are exposed to two contrasting views of ideal
which in turn, contribute to increased obesity body size, which may influence their BD rate. One
(McCabe & Ricciardelli, 2003). The sociocultural perspective on body size that Hispanic children may
model (Stice & Agras, 1998) has been used to be exposed to is the traditional Hispanic “chubby
explain the role that both internalization of the thin (gordito)” view of body size as acceptable and ideal.
ideal and body dissatisfaction (BD) play in predict- This view is based on the notion that it represents a
ing eating disorders. According to the sociocultural state of being “healthy and well cared for” by
model, thin body-ideal internalization leads to BD, parents (Caballero & Tenzer, 2007; Contento, Basch,
which results in negative affect and eating disor- & Zybert, 2003; Olvera, George, & Kaiser, 2011).
ders. Consistent with this model, several studies Additionally, Hispanic children are exposed to the
have shown that thin-ideal internalization and BD American “thin-ideal” body size as portrayed in the
lead to dieting, binge eating, and purging (McCabe media (Caballero & Tenzer, 2007; Contento et al.,
& Ricciardelli, 2003; Neumark-Sztainer, Wall, Story, 2003; Myers & Crowther, 2007; Rubin, Fitts, &
& Perry, 2003; Ricciardelli & McCabe, 2001; Stice & Becker, 2003). Thus, it is expected that Hispanic
Bearman, 2001). Given the significant role that thin youth who endorse a more traditionally Hispanic
body-ideal internalization and BD play in the view of ideal body size will report lower BD than
development of eating disorders, an examination of those endorsing the American thin ideal. Consistent
the risk factors for these body image disturbances with this assumption, Ayala, Mickens, Galindo, and
is essential from a preventive perspective. Elder (2007) showed that Hispanic adolescents with
high levels of acculturation (or strong identification
with the American culture) were more likely to
report greater BD than their less acculturated coun-
We would like to thank all the participating children for their
contribution to this manuscript and also to the research assistants terparts. In another study, Olvera, Suminski, and
who assisted in the data collection and data entry. Finally, we Power (2005) reported that Hispanic elementary-
appreciate Dr. Lorriane Rietzel’s assistance in editing this manu- school children who spoke primarily English were
script. This study was supported by the National Institutes of Dia-
betes and Digestive and Kidney Disease (Grant #R03DK58927).
Requests for reprints should be sent to Norma Olvera, Depart- © 2014 The Authors
ment of Educational Psychology, University of Houston, 491 Journal of Research on Adolescence © 2014 Society for Research on Adolescence
Farish Hall, Houston TX 77204. E-mail: nolvera@uh.edu DOI: 10.1111/jora.12165
BODY IMAGE IN YOUTH 729

more likely to prefer thinner figures as their ideal is expected to serve as a, protective factor against BD
body size, compared to those who spoke predomi- (Campbell & Hausenblas, 2009). Data collected with
nantly Spanish. Furthermore, Hispanic girls were White children and adolescents have shown there is
more likely to prefer smaller body sizes as ideal than a positive association among physical activity, exer-
did Hispanic boys. Similarly, Mirza, Davis, and cise, and body satisfaction levels (Duncan, Al-Na-
Yanovski (2005) found that Hispanic adolescent keeb, Nevill, & Jones, 2006; Gillison, Standage, &
females preferred smaller body sizes as ideal than Skevington, 2006). However, the link between BD
did their male counterparts. These studies suggest and physical activity is not simple and varies as a
that acculturation and gender might be influencing function of physical activity status and body compo-
ideal body size and BD within Hispanic youth. sition. Parfitt, Pavey, and Rowlands (2009) observed
There is a paucity of studies assessing ethnic dif- a weak correlation between children’s BD and overall
ferences in ideal body size and BD in Hispanic and physical activity, but they reported stronger associa-
White youth. Of the limited studies available, the tions between BD and two levels of physical activity
results have been inconsistent and equivocal. One —very light and light. Goldfield et al. (2011) revealed
study, involving only girls, found no significant that only vigorous physical activity was associated
differences between Hispanic and White preadoles- with improvements in body esteem in adolescents.
cent girls on body image disturbances (Erickson & However, Olive et al. (2012) showed that the associa-
Gerstle, 2007). Conversely, Ceballos and Czy- tion between physical activity and BD was not signif-
zewska (2010) noted that Hispanic adolescents icant after controlling for %BF.
(females and males; aged 12–15 years) had lower Limited research has examined factors that are
rates of BD compared to their White counterparts. associated with %BF, such as cardiorespiratory fit-
A trend for an interaction between gender and eth- ness (CRF), which may act as a buffer to BD in
nicity was also noted, with White females exhibit- youth. The link between CRF and BD can be
ing the highest BD rates followed by Hispanic explained by the notion that improvements in CRF
females, White males, and Hispanic males. It is lead to increases in lean mass and decreases in fat
possible that ethnic differences in Hispanic and mass, resulting in a body size that closely reflects
White youth may be moderated by gender. How- societal ideals and in subsequently higher body sat-
ever, the role of gender as a potential moderator isfaction (Kimm et al., 2005). A review of the litera-
has yet to be determined. ture indicates that few studies have investigated
Gender differences in preferred thin body ideal the association between CRF and BD. Among those
and BD in children and adolescents are well docu- that have investigated these relations, CRF has
mented (Presnell, Bearman, & Stice, 2004; Xantho- been consistently negatively associated with BD
poulos et al., 2011). Girls are more likely to report levels, particularly in girls (Hausenblas, Downs,
higher levels of body dissatisfaction than males Fleming, & Connaughton, 2002; Olive et al., 2012;
(Lawler & Nixon, 2011). An explanation for these Schubert, Januario, Casonatto, & Sonoo, 2013). The
gender differences in BD has been attributed to the focus on CRF is particularly relevant because of its
preferences of girls and women to be thin, whereas strong association with abdominal fat in youth,
among boys and men, there is a preference to be which leads to cardiovascular disease in adulthood
muscular (Bergeron & Tylka, 2007; McCabe & Ricc- (Castillo, Ortega, Ruiz, & Sjostrom, 2008).
iardelli, 2005; Petrie, Greenleaf, & Martin, 2010). The present study contributes to the current body
Furthermore, BD has been observed to increase of knowledge in body image disturbances by exam-
through middle childhood and adolescence (Smo- ining the following: (1) ethnic differences in body
lak, 2004), particularly in girls (Olive, Byrne, Cunn- size ideal and BD in Hispanic and White preadoles-
ingham, & Telford, 2012). These findings highlight cent boys and girls, (2) gender differences in body
the importance of accounting for ethnicity, gender, size ideal and BD in Hispanic and White preadoles-
and age factors when studying BD in youth. cent boys and girls, and (3) the combined predictive
Body composition is another factor commonly effects of body composition and CRF on BD, after
found to be linked to BD in youth. Evidence suggests controlling for demographic and cultural factors.
that children and adolescents with excessive percent Moreover, rationales for ideal body size selection in
body fat (%BF) and large body mass indices (BMIs) Hispanic and White children were examined to
report greater BD than their thinner counterparts determine whether size, muscularity, and health
(Banitt et al., 2008; Lawler & Nixon, 2011; Olive et al., rationales were seen as more or less prominent for
2012). While %BF and BMI have been identified as the different groups of children. Corresponding with
risk factors for BD, participation in physical activity the aims of this study, the following hypotheses
730 
OLVERA, MCCARLEY, RODRIGUEZ, NOOR, AND HERNANDEZ-VALERO

were proposed: (1) Hispanic preadolescents will BF. For boys, the equation to calculate was %
select heavier figures as their ideal body sizes and BF = 0.735 * (triceps + calf) + 1. For girls, the equa-
exhibit lower levels of BD than White preadoles- tion was %BF = 0.610 * (triceps + calf) + 5. Body
cents, (2) girls will select thinner figures as their weight and height were measured to the nearest
ideal body sizes and exhibit greater BD than boys, 0.1 kg and 0.1 cm, respectively, using a scale (Tanita
and (3) children’s body composition indicators and TBF 310) and a stadiometer (Seca 213). A bilingual
CRF will be expected to predict BD, after controlling research assistant instructed each participant to
for demographic and cultural factors. remove his or her shoes, socks, and heavy garments
before stepping onto the scale. Height was deter-
mined without shoes, with the heels of both feet
METHOD together, and the toes pointed slightly outward at
approximately a 60-degree angle. Arms were at the
Participants
sides of the body. Heels, buttocks, and back of the
The sample consisted of 190 preadolescents (103 head were touching the vertical backboard of the
girls; 87 boys) between the ages of 10–13 years. scale, and the headpiece was lowered until it firmly
Ninety-seven participants (51%) were self-identified touched the crown of the participant’s head. BMI
Hispanic, and 93 were self-identified White (49%). was calculated using Quetelet’s index [body weight
The participants were recruited from two suburban (kilograms) divided by height2 (meters)]. BMI values
elementary and two junior high schools and were were then used to identify the age- and gender-spe-
part of a larger NIH-funded study to assess corre- cific percentile for each participant using the Centers
lates of CRF in school children and adolescents. for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) growth
These schools were selected for their similar charac- tables (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,
teristics in (1) the proportion of Hispanic and White 2011). Based on these tables, a participant was classi-
students (45%–55%), (2) socioeconomic levels (33%– fied as normal weight (BMI < 85th percentile), over-
38% economically disadvantaged), and (3) geo- weight (BMI ≥ 85th–94th percentile), or obese
graphic proximity (schools were located within a (BMI ≥ 95th percentile).
five-mile radius). Before collecting any data, parents
and children were asked to sign consent and assent Body image variables. Ideal body size and BD
forms, respectively. Both of these forms included were assessed using the Figure Rating Scale, which
information about participants’ rights to withdraw consists of seven gender-specific figures, developed
from the study without affecting their school grades by Collins (1991). Participants in this study were
or their eligibility to receive a toy and a $5 gift card. asked to determine their perceived body size with
The University of Houston Committee for the Protec- the question, “Which picture looks the most like
tion of Human Subjects and School District approved you?” The participant’s ideal body size was assessed
the assent and consent forms used in this study. by asking him or her the question, “Which picture
shows the way you want to look?” Participants’ lev-
els of body size satisfaction were determined by sub-
Measures
tracting each participant’s ideal body size figure
Demographic and cultural characteristics. Each from his or her perceived body size, resulting in
participant responded to questions related to his or scores that ranged from 6 to +6. Zero scores indi-
her age, gender, grade, place of birth, and parental cated that the participant was satisfied with his or
occupation. Preferred language spoken at home her perceived body size. In contrast, negative or
was used as a proxy for acculturation. Using lan- positive scores indicated body size dissatisfaction,
guage preferences at home as a proxy for deter- meaning that the participant would like to be thin-
mining acculturation level among children has ner or bigger than his or her perceived body size.
previously employed in the assessment of relation- Following the question about his or her ideal self,
ships between acculturation and health beliefs and each participant was asked to provide a rationale for
behaviors (Dinh, Roosa, Tein, & Lopez, 2002; his or her selected figure. Rationales were grouped
Epstein, Botvin, & Diaz, 1998). into four categories: appearance, weight/size,
health/fitness, and psychosocial. Appearance ratio-
Body composition. Percent body fat was nales included statements related to general physical
assessed by measuring skinfolds at the triceps and appearance or looks, excluding weight or health ref-
calf, following procedures developed by Lohman erences (e.g., “She looks pretty”). Weight/size ratio-
(1992). Lohman’s equation was used to calculate % nales included statements related to weight (e.g.,
BODY IMAGE IN YOUTH 731

“She looks thin” or “She is small”). Health/fitness research and recruitment procedures. With their
rationales included references to health or fitness full support, the research assistants made an
(e.g., “He looks healthy” or “He looks muscular”). announcement about the study during physical-
Psychosocial rationales included statements related education sessions and distributed clasp envelopes
to mood or social status (e.g., “She looks happy” or among students who were interested in participat-
“She has more friends”). The Figure Rating Scale ing in the study to take home to their parents. Each
instrument has a good test–retest reliability for the clasp envelope contained information about the
perceived body size figure selected (r = .71) and study and the consent and assent forms. Students
sound reliability for the selected ideal figure who returned signed parental and assent forms
(r = .59). A significant correlation has been reported participated in the study. Data were collected at 2-
between figure size and BMI (r = .37). day measurement sessions during physical educa-
tion classes for a period of 10 weeks. At Day 1
Cardiorespiratory fitness. The 20-Meter Endur- measurement, bilingual research assistants assessed
ance Shuttle Run Test (MST) was used to estimate each participant’s height, weight, and skinfolds. To
maximal speed in participants, which in turn was ensure the student’s privacy, a small room was
employed to determine VO2max (CRF level). The 20 assigned to conduct these assessments. At Day 2
MST is a practical and reliable CRF test which allows measurement, demographic, cultural, body image,
a large number of participants to be tested at the and 20 MST were administered.
same time (Ruiz et al., 2008). This test consisted of
1-min stages of continuous incremental-paced run-
Data Analysis
ning. The starting speed began at 8.5 km/h and
increased by 0.5 km/h at each successive minute, Descriptive statistics (means and standard devia-
reaching 18.0 km/h at min 20. Guided by auditory tions for continuous variables; frequencies and per-
signals emitted from a prerecorded tape, children centages for categorical variables) were calculated
ran 20 m, turned, and ran back 20 m, touching par- separately for Hispanic and White participants,
allel lines placed 20 m apart. When a participant and for boys and girls, to test for ethnic and gen-
stopped or failed to touch the end line twice, the test der differences in overall sample characteristics
was terminated. The maximal speed was deter- and body image variables. Specifically, using chi-
mined by the last lap completed. The equation used square tests with Yates’ continuity correction and
to calculate VO2max was developed by Leger and 2 9 2 ANOVAs for continuous outcome variables,
Lambert (1982); where VO2max = 31.025 + 3.238 * S ethnic and gender differences were examined for
(final speed) 3.248 * A (age) + 0.1536 * S * A. BMI, %BF, CRF, ratings of children’s ideal body
sizes, rationales for ideal body size selections, and
Training. Bilingual kinesiology research assis- BD. Correlation and hierarchical multiple regression
tants were trained in assessing body composition were employed to assess the contribution of demo-
and VO2max. As part of the training, research assis- graphic factors (age, gender, ethnicity, and accultur-
tants received a written protocol to follow when con- ation), body composition indicators (BMI and %BF),
ducting measurements. The research assistants then and CRF in predicting BD. The unique contribution
observed a demonstration for assessing height, of each variable was estimated through the squared
weight, skinfold measurements, and VO2max. After semipartial correlations (sr2i ). Additionally, the coef-
the demonstration, they practiced procedures while ficient of multiple determination (R2) expressed the
being observed by one of the investigators, who pro- proportion of variance in the dependent variable
vided feedback. Once 90% agreement between the that was shared by the weighted contribution of the
trainer and each research assistant was reached, the independent variables at each block. Assumptions
research assistant was able to assess the participants. of normality, linearity, and homoscedasticity were
evaluated and yielded no serious violations. While
several variables of interest appeared to have a posi-
Procedure
tive skew, light to moderate positive kurtosis, and
After obtaining permission from the school district, several multivariate outliers, they were not removed
school principals from the four selected schools due to the exploratory nature of this study. An
were contacted to solicit their support for the examination of bivariate correlations among the
study. The principals introduced the research team independent variables indicated that multicollineari-
to the physical education coordinators and teachers ty was present, most likely stemming from the
at each school to discuss the objectives of the strong positive correlation between BMI and %BF.
736 
OLVERA, MCCARLEY, RODRIGUEZ, NOOR, AND HERNANDEZ-VALERO

employed in both studies. The sample in our study et al. (2012) reported that BD was significantly
consisted primarily of preadolescents compared to related to %BF and CRF in boys and girls. The
the sample of adolescents (aged 12–15 years) association between BD and CRF was observed to
employed in the Ceballos and Czyzewska’s (2010) be independent of the child’s body composition.
study. It is plausible that as BD increases through There are some explanations for the discrepancies
middle childhood and adolescence (Smolak, 2004), of the results. It is plausible that the influence of
particularly in girls (Olive et al., 2012), ethnic dif- CRF on body dissatisfaction may be indirect
ferences in BD emerge. Future studies are needed through its impact on physical self-concept and
to assess the development of BD in Hispanic and competence (Olive et al., 2012; Petrie et al., 2010).
White youth longitudinally through childhood and Unfortunately, neither physical self-concept nor
adolescence to better determine the prevalence of physical activity self-confidence were assessed in
ethnic differences and to identify the factors that this study. Future research should include such
may influence these differences. variables to examine potential mediating effects
This study also examined the relationships between cardiorespiratory fitness and body size
among body composition, CRF, and BD in His- satisfaction level.
panic and White youth during preadolescence. Pre- There are some limitations to this study.
adolescence is a critical period of extensive bodily Although the authors of this study used BMI in
changes and is also a risk factor for BD (McCabe & combination with %BF to predict BD, the inclusion
Ricciardelli, 2004). Findings from this study indi- of BMI estimation to assess body size in school-
cated that BD was associated significantly with aged populations is problematic. Specifically, BMI
BMI and %BF in a sample of preadolescents. Partic- only considers body weight relative to height and
ipants with higher BMI and %BF were more likely thus does not differentiate between fat-free mass
to be dissatisfied with their body size compared to and fat mass (Gutin, 2011). Furthermore, this study
their leaner counterparts. These findings are consis- did not take into consideration interindividual and
tent with previous studies (Mirza et al., 2005; Petrie gender variation in sexual maturation rates which
et al., 2010; Xanthopoulos et al., 2011) reporting are related to children’s and adolescents’ views of
that body composition was strongly associated their physical bodies. For instance, girls start the
with BD. pubertal stage earlier than boys, on average, and
There was also a bivariate relationship between may be more advanced in relation to physical
BD and CRF observed in the present study. Corre- development at this stage, which may have influ-
sponding with previous research (Hausenblas enced their body size satisfaction level (Telford &
et al., 2002; Olive et al., 2012; Schubert et al., 2013), Cunningham, 2008). Therefore, any gender differ-
participants who reported that they were more dis- ences observed in this study in relation to body
satisfied with their body sizes were less likely to be perceptions may be convoluted by maturation
physically fit. Perhaps, less physically fit preadoles- stage. Future studies should include sexual matura-
cents assessed their body size more negatively and tion measures (e.g., Tanner Stages of Sexual Matu-
less reflective of societal ideals than their more ration developed by Tanner, 1962) to assess
physically fit counterparts. Cardiorespiratory fit- accurately gender differences in body size ideal
ness was also associated negatively with %BF and and dissatisfaction. An additional limitation is the
BMI, suggesting that less fit children were more use of Collins’ Figure Rating Scale, which relies
likely to exhibit greater %BF or BMI. These find- upon Caucasian features to measure Hispanic chil-
ings suggest that increases in CRF may act as a dren’s body image perceptions. It is uncertain
protective factor against BD in Hispanic and White whether Hispanic preadolescents can relate to
preadolescents, whereas increases in %BF and BMI those figures in the same way as White preadoles-
may be risk factors for BD. The use of %BF in addi- cents. Another limitation is the influence of social
tion to BMI is strength of the current study. desirability on participants’ responses in this study.
The predictive effects of body composition and For example, participants may have been influ-
CRF on BD after controlling for demographic and enced by a desire to provide socially acceptable
cultural factors were examined to test the third responses when explaining their preferences for
hypothesis, which was partially supported. Consis- selected figures as ideal body sizes (e.g., rationales
tent with Hausenblas et al. (2002), results from this such as weight-related or health/fitness might have
study indicated that body composition variables been perceived as more socially acceptable than
significantly predicted BD, but CRF did not when romantic or sexually attractive rationales). Despite
both were included in the model. In contrast, Olive the cited limitations, this research represents one of
BODY IMAGE IN YOUTH 733

third born in Mexico (37%), as compared to 2% of similar figures as ideal (see Table 2). Conversely, as
White participants. The percentage of participants hypothesized a main effect of gender was observed
speaking at least some Spanish at home significantly with girls selecting smaller figures as ideal com-
differed by ethnicity [v2(1, N = 190) = 81.24, p < .05, pared to boys [F(1, 186) = 9.86, p = .002, partial
u = .67]. Namely, almost two-thirds (62%) of the g2 = .05]. Furthermore, a significant interaction of
Hispanic participants reported speaking some Span- gender and ethnicity on ideal body size was
ish or a mixture of English and Spanish with their reported [F(1, 186) = 6.85, p = .01, partial g2 = .036].
parents at home. In contrast, none of their White Although White boys and girls did not significantly
counterparts spoke any language other than English differ in ideal body size preferences (girls M = 3.48,
at home. White participants were more likely to SD = .57; boys M = 3.54, SD = .68) [F(1, 91) = 0.19,
have parents with technical and managerial occupa- p = .66, partial g2 = .002], Hispanic boys and girls
tions than their Hispanic counterparts. Hispanic did. Specifically, Hispanic boys preferred signifi-
participants were more likely to have fathers with cantly larger figures (M = 3.79, SD = .74) than His-
operator and laborer occupations and mothers who panic girls (M = 3.16, SD = .94) [F(1, 95) = 13.26,
were housewives [father’s occupation: v2(7, N = p = .0004, partial g2 = .12].
190) = 25.39, p < .05, u = .35; mother’s occupation: To further investigate the above group differ-
v2(6, N = 190) = 25.36, p < .05, u = .36]. There was a ences in ideal body size selection, children were
trend for Hispanic participants to be categorized as asked to provide rationales for their selections. A
overweight. Forty-seven percent of Hispanic partici- 4 9 4 chi-square test of independence revealed no
pants were categorized as overweight (BMI significant group differences regarding partici-
between ≥ 85th–94th percentile) compared to 33% pants’ rationales for their preferred ideal body size
of White children [v2(1, N = 190) = 3.35, p = .07, selection [v2(12, N = 190) = 12.57, p = .40, u = .26].
u = .14]. However, from a purely descriptive perspective,
the selected rationales provide interesting insight
into children’s selections of their ideal body sizes.
Ethnic and Gender Differences in Body Size
Specifically, while Hispanic and White girls and
Ideal and Dissatisfaction
boys selected weight/size as the most frequent
To evaluate the hypothesized effects of ethnicity rationale for their ideal body size selections, White
and gender on ideal body size selections, a 2 9 2 girls selected that rationale most frequently (White
between-subjects analysis of variance was per- girls: 59%; White boys: 50%; Hispanic girls 51%;
formed. With respect to ideal body size, we Hispanic boys: 46%). Hispanic and White girls
expected that Hispanic children to select larger fig- were more likely to cite appearance/looks as the
ures than White children and girls to select thinner rationale for their body size selections (Hispanic
figures than boys. Findings indicated that there was girls: 36%; White girls: 33%; Hispanic boys: 29%;
no main effect of ethnicity on ideal body size selec- White boys: 26%). White males most often listed
tion [F(1, 186) = 0.08, p = .78, partial g2 = .0004]. health/fitness as the rationale for their ideal body
That is, Hispanic and White participants selected size selection (White boys: 21%; Hispanic boys:

TABLE 2
Descriptive Statistics for Body Size Ideal and Body Dissatisfaction

White (N = 93) Hispanic (N = 97) Total (N = 190)

Variable Girls (N = 54) Boys (N = 39) Girls (N = 49) Boys (N = 48) Girls (N = 103) Boys (N = 87)

Ideal Body Size Figure M (SD) 3.48 (0.57) 3.54 (0.68) 3.16 (0.94) 3.79 (0.74) 3.33 (0.79) 3.68 (0.72)
Ideal Body Size Rationales N (%)
Appearance 18 (33.3) 10 (25.6) 16 (32.7) 14 (29.2) 34 (33.0) 24 (27.6)
Weight/size 32 (59.3) 20 (51.3) 25 (51.0) 23 (47.9) 57 (55.3) 43 (49.4)
Health/fitness 2 (3.7) 8 (20.5) 4 (8.2) 7 (14.6) 6 (5.8) 15 (17.2)
Psychosocial 2 (3.7) 1 (2.6) 4 (8.2) 4 (8.3) 6 (5.8) 5 (5.7)
Body dissatisfaction 0.37 (0.9) 0.38 (1.0) 0.53 (1.0) 0.25 (0.8) 0.45 (1.0) 0.31 (0.9)
(continuous) M (SD)

Note. Chi-square and 2 9 2 ANOVAs used to examine ethnic and gender differences. A significant Gender 9 Ethnicity interaction
and main effect for gender was found in participants’ selections of their ideal body size figures.
734 
OLVERA, MCCARLEY, RODRIGUEZ, NOOR, AND HERNANDEZ-VALERO

15%; White girls: 8%; Hispanic girls: 4%). Finally, BMI shared a strong and positive relationship
Hispanic boys and girls selected psychosocial ratio- with %BF [r(190) = .83, p < .01]. Both BMI and %BF
nales more frequently than their White counter- were negatively associated with the CRF measure
parts (Hispanic boys 9%; Hispanic girls: 8%; White (VO2max), such that as BMI and %BF increased,
girls: 4%; White boys: 3%). VO2max decreased [rBMI(190) = .47, p < .01; r%
With respect to body dissatisfaction, we hypothe- BF(190) = .47, p < .01]. Body dissatisfaction was
sized that Hispanic participants would report lower positively related to BMI [r(190) = .62, p < .01] and
levels of BD than their White counterparts and that %BF [r(190) = .62, p < .01] and negatively associ-
girls would report higher levels of BD than boys. ated with VO2max [r(190) = .26, p < .01]. Those
However, findings indicated no significant main participants who reported dissatisfaction with their
effect of gender or ethnicity [Fgender(1, 186) = .95, body sizes were more likely to have a higher BMI
p = .33, partial g2 = .005; Fethnicity(1, 186) = .01, p = and %BF and less likely to be physically fit.
.93, partial g2 = .0004]. Furthermore, there was no Hierarchical multiple regression was used to
significant interaction between gender and ethnicity examine the combined predictive effects of body
on BD [F(1, 186) = 1.16, p = .28, partial g2 = .006]. composition and CRF on BD, after controlling for
the demographic and cultural factors (age, gender,
ethnicity, and language spoken at home). Although
Relationships Among Demographic, Cultural,
none of the demographic and cultural variables
Body Composition Indicators, Cardiorespiratory
shared a bivariate relationship with BD, they were
Fitness, and Body Image Variables
included in the regression model based on theory
Fisher’s Z transformation was applied to the bivari- and in an effort to rule out any potential omitted-
ate correlation matrices to determine whether variable biases. At Step 1, in addition to age and gen-
bivariate relationships among the variables of inter- der, ethnicity and language spoken at home were
est needed to be examined separately by ethnicity entered into the model. As summarized in Table 4,
and gender. There were no significant gender or with age, gender, ethnicity, and language spoken at
ethnicity differences among the bivariate correla- home in the equation, multiple R was not signifi-
tion coefficients. Therefore, the primary analyses cantly different from zero [R2 = .02 (adjusted R2 =
reflect patterns in the sample as a whole. The .005), Finc(4, 184) = .78, p = .54]. These findings
bivariate correlation matrix for all of the variables suggest that these factors do not reliably predict BD.
that were included in the regression model is pre- At Step 2, BMI and %BF were included to deter-
sented in Table 3. Language spoken at home was mine the relationship between body composition
associated with both BMI and ethnicity. Children indicators and BD, after controlling for demo-
who spoke Spanish at home were more likely to be graphic and cultural characteristics. Furthermore,
heavier [r(190) = .17, p < .05] and of Hispanic ori- VO2max was incorporated into the model to exam-
gin [r(190) = .66, p < .01] than children who only ine the unique contribution of CRF in predicting
spoke English at home. BD. After Step 2, with BMI, %BF, and VO2max in

TABLE 3
Correlation Matrix of Study Variables

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1. Age 1.00 — — — — — — —
2. Gendera 0.16* 1.00 — — — — — —
3. Ethnicityb 0.13 0.07 1.00 — — — — —
4. Languagec 0.07 0.07 0.66** 1.00 — — — —
5. BMI 0.01 0.01 0.14* 0.17* 1.00 — — —
6. %BF 0.16* 0.14* 0.06 0.05 0.83** 1.00 — —
7. Cardiorespiratory fitness 0.22** 0.08 0.06 0.09 0.47** 0.47** 1.00 —
8. Body dissatisfaction 0.10 0.09 0.02 0.01 0.62** 0.62** 0.26** 1.00

*p < .05; **p < .01.


a
Males coded as 1, females 0.
b
Hispanic preadolescents coded as 1, White preadolescents 0.
c
If some Spanish spoken at home coded as 1, if only English coded as 0. BF = body fat.
BODY IMAGE IN YOUTH 735

TABLE 4
Summary of Hierarchical Regression Analysis for Variables Predicting Body Dissatisfaction

Model 1 Model 2

Predictor B SEB b sr2i B SEB b sr2i

Age .12 .10 .10 .01 .05 .08 .04 .002


Gendera .14 .14 .07 .005 .06 .11 .03 .002
Ethnicityb .11 .19 .06 .003 .13 .15 .07 .005
Languagec .07 .20 .03 .002 .24 .15 .12 .01
BMI — — — — .08 .02 .40** .06
%BF — — — — .03 .01 .32** .04
Cardiorespiratory fitness — — — — .02 .02 .07 .01
Adjusted R2 .005 .41
F for change in R2 .78 44.81**

*p < .05; **p < .01.


a
Males coded as 1, females 0.
b
Hispanic preadolescents coded as 1, White preadolescents 0.
c
If some Spanish spoken at home coded as 1, if only English coded as 0 (N = 190).

the equation, R2 = .44 was significantly different Contrary to the first hypothesis, findings from
from zero (adjusted R2 = .41), Finc(3, 181) = 44.81, this study revealed that Hispanic and White chil-
p < .01. The addition of the body composition indi- dren selected similar figures as ideal. However, a
cators and CRF resulted in a significant increment significant ethnic by gender interaction was
in R2. However, only BMI and %BF were signifi- observed. While White boys and girls preferred
cantly predictive of BD; CRF was not. The adjusted similar body size ideals, Hispanic boys preferred
R2 value of .41 indicates that nearly one-half of the significantly larger figures than Hispanic girls.
variance in BD was predicted by age, ethnicity, lan- These findings partially support the second
guage spoken at home, BMI, %BF, and VO2max. hypothesis and are consistent with previous studies
More specifically, for every one-unit increase in indicating that Hispanic girls preferred smaller fig-
BMI (b = .40, p < .01), BD progressed from smaller ures as ideal compared to Hispanic boys (Mirza
to larger than ideal by .40 units, holding all other et al., 2005; Olvera et al., 2005). It is possible that
variables constant. Likewise, increases in %BF were Hispanic boys and girls may be socialized differ-
associated with BD in the direction of perceiving ently, leading Hispanic boys to select heavier fig-
oneself as larger than ideal (b = .32 p < .01), con- ures than Hispanic girls as ideal. Hispanic parents
trolling for all other variables. Although not signifi- may encourage their children, particularly males,
cant, there was a trend for participants who spoke to gain weight (Ceballos & Czyzewska, 2010). Olve-
Spanish at home to be more likely to be satisfied ra et al. (2005) found that Hispanic mothers, when
with their body size (b = .12, p = .12), controlling rating body figures for their children, considered
for all other variables in the model. larger figures to be more attractive for their boys
than for their girls. Furthermore, it is conceivable
that these gender differences observed in ideal
DISCUSSION
body size selection among Hispanic preadolescents
The current study contributed to the literature by might explain the gender differences existing in the
examining ethnic and gender differences in pre- prevalence of obesity in this population, with His-
ferred ideal body size, BD, and predictors of BD in panic boys exhibiting greater rates of obesity than
a sample of Hispanic and White preadolescents, Hispanic girls (Ogden et al., 2012).
aged 10–13 years. Almost half of the Hispanic par- No ethnic differences on BD were observed in
ticipants were categorized as overweight, com- this study. These findings are divergent from those
pared to 30% of the White participants. Hispanic reported by Ceballos and Czyzewska (2010), who
participants were more likely to speak Spanish at found significant ethnic differences in BD in White
home, have fathers with operator or laborer occu- and Hispanic adolescents. The inconsistency of
pations, and housewife mothers than their White results regarding ethnic differences in BD may be
counterparts. due to developmental differences in the samples
736 
OLVERA, MCCARLEY, RODRIGUEZ, NOOR, AND HERNANDEZ-VALERO

employed in both studies. The sample in our study et al. (2012) reported that BD was significantly
consisted primarily of preadolescents compared to related to %BF and CRF in boys and girls. The
the sample of adolescents (aged 12–15 years) association between BD and CRF was observed to
employed in the Ceballos and Czyzewska’s (2010) be independent of the child’s body composition.
study. It is plausible that as BD increases through There are some explanations for the discrepancies
middle childhood and adolescence (Smolak, 2004), of the results. It is plausible that the influence of
particularly in girls (Olive et al., 2012), ethnic dif- CRF on body dissatisfaction may be indirect
ferences in BD emerge. Future studies are needed through its impact on physical self-concept and
to assess the development of BD in Hispanic and competence (Olive et al., 2012; Petrie et al., 2010).
White youth longitudinally through childhood and Unfortunately, neither physical self-concept nor
adolescence to better determine the prevalence of physical activity self-confidence were assessed in
ethnic differences and to identify the factors that this study. Future research should include such
may influence these differences. variables to examine potential mediating effects
This study also examined the relationships between cardiorespiratory fitness and body size
among body composition, CRF, and BD in His- satisfaction level.
panic and White youth during preadolescence. Pre- There are some limitations to this study.
adolescence is a critical period of extensive bodily Although the authors of this study used BMI in
changes and is also a risk factor for BD (McCabe & combination with %BF to predict BD, the inclusion
Ricciardelli, 2004). Findings from this study indi- of BMI estimation to assess body size in school-
cated that BD was associated significantly with aged populations is problematic. Specifically, BMI
BMI and %BF in a sample of preadolescents. Partic- only considers body weight relative to height and
ipants with higher BMI and %BF were more likely thus does not differentiate between fat-free mass
to be dissatisfied with their body size compared to and fat mass (Gutin, 2011). Furthermore, this study
their leaner counterparts. These findings are consis- did not take into consideration interindividual and
tent with previous studies (Mirza et al., 2005; Petrie gender variation in sexual maturation rates which
et al., 2010; Xanthopoulos et al., 2011) reporting are related to children’s and adolescents’ views of
that body composition was strongly associated their physical bodies. For instance, girls start the
with BD. pubertal stage earlier than boys, on average, and
There was also a bivariate relationship between may be more advanced in relation to physical
BD and CRF observed in the present study. Corre- development at this stage, which may have influ-
sponding with previous research (Hausenblas enced their body size satisfaction level (Telford &
et al., 2002; Olive et al., 2012; Schubert et al., 2013), Cunningham, 2008). Therefore, any gender differ-
participants who reported that they were more dis- ences observed in this study in relation to body
satisfied with their body sizes were less likely to be perceptions may be convoluted by maturation
physically fit. Perhaps, less physically fit preadoles- stage. Future studies should include sexual matura-
cents assessed their body size more negatively and tion measures (e.g., Tanner Stages of Sexual Matu-
less reflective of societal ideals than their more ration developed by Tanner, 1962) to assess
physically fit counterparts. Cardiorespiratory fit- accurately gender differences in body size ideal
ness was also associated negatively with %BF and and dissatisfaction. An additional limitation is the
BMI, suggesting that less fit children were more use of Collins’ Figure Rating Scale, which relies
likely to exhibit greater %BF or BMI. These find- upon Caucasian features to measure Hispanic chil-
ings suggest that increases in CRF may act as a dren’s body image perceptions. It is uncertain
protective factor against BD in Hispanic and White whether Hispanic preadolescents can relate to
preadolescents, whereas increases in %BF and BMI those figures in the same way as White preadoles-
may be risk factors for BD. The use of %BF in addi- cents. Another limitation is the influence of social
tion to BMI is strength of the current study. desirability on participants’ responses in this study.
The predictive effects of body composition and For example, participants may have been influ-
CRF on BD after controlling for demographic and enced by a desire to provide socially acceptable
cultural factors were examined to test the third responses when explaining their preferences for
hypothesis, which was partially supported. Consis- selected figures as ideal body sizes (e.g., rationales
tent with Hausenblas et al. (2002), results from this such as weight-related or health/fitness might have
study indicated that body composition variables been perceived as more socially acceptable than
significantly predicted BD, but CRF did not when romantic or sexually attractive rationales). Despite
both were included in the model. In contrast, Olive the cited limitations, this research represents one of
BODY IMAGE IN YOUTH 737

the few studies that provides evidence regarding gitudinal mediation model. Journal of Abnormal Child
body image disturbances and predictors of BD Psychology, 30, 295–309. doi:10.1023/A:1015111014775
(encompassing both body composition indicators Duncan, M. J., Al-Nakeeb, Y., Nevill, A., & Jones, M. V.
and CRF) in Hispanic and White preadolescents. (2006). Body image and physical activity in British
secondary school children. European Physical Education
These findings have relevant implications for
Review, 10, 243–260. doi:10.1177/1356336X04047125
future lines of research given the potential implica-
Epstein, J. A., Botvin, G. J., & Diaz, T. (1998). Linguistic
tions of BD on obesity and eating disorders. acculturation and gender effects on smoking among
Hispanic youth. Preventive Medicine, 27, 583–589.
REFERENCES doi:10.1006/pmed.1998.0329
Erickson, S. J., & Gerstle, M. (2007). Investigation of ethnic
Ayala, G. X., Mickens, L., Galindo, P., & Elder, J. P. differences in body image between Hispanic/biethnic-
(2007). Acculturation and body image perception Hispanic and non-Hispanic White preadolescent girls.
among Latino youth. Ethnicity and Health, 12, 21–41. Body Image, 4, 69–78. doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2006.11.003
doi:10.1080/13557850600824294 Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007).
Banitt, A., Kaur, H., Pulvers, K., Nollen, N., Ireland, M., G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis pro-
& Fitzgibbon, M. (2008). BMI percentiles and body gram for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sci-
image discrepancy in black and white adolescents. ences. Behavior Research Methods, 54, 175–191. doi:10.
Obesity, 16, 987–991. doi:10.1038/oby.2008.21 3758/BF03193146
Bergeron, D., & Tylka, T. L. (2007). Support of the Gillison, F. B., Standage, M., & Skevington, S. M. (2006).
uniqueness of body dissatisfaction from drive for mus- Relationships among adolescents’ weight perceptions,
cularity among men. Body Image, 4, 288–295. doi:10. exercise goals, exercise motivation, quality of life and
1016/j.bodyim.2007.05.002 leisure-time exercise behavior: A self-determination
Caballero, A. E., & Tenzer, P. (2007). Building cultural theory approach. Health Education Research, 21, 836–
competency for improved diabetes care: Latino 847. doi:10.1093/her/cyl139
Americans and diabetes. Journal of Family Practice, 56, Goldfield, G., Henderson, K., Buchholz, A., Obeid, N.,
7–13. Nguyen, H., & Flament, M. (2011). Physical activity
Campbell, A., & Hausenblas, H. A. (2009). Effects of and psychological adjustment in adolescents. Journal of
exercise interventions on body image: A meta-analysis. Physical Activity and Health, 8, 157–163.
Journal of Health Psychology, 14, 780–793. doi:10.1177/ Gutin, B. (2011). The role of nutrient partitioning and
1359105309338977 stem cell differentiation in pediatric obesity: A new
Castillo, M. J., Ortega, F. B., Ruiz, J. R., & Sjostrom, M. theory. International Journal of Pediatric Obesity, 6, 7–12.
(2008). Physical fitness in childhood and adolescence: doi:10.3109/17477166.2011.590201
A powerful marker of health. International Journal of Hausenblas, H. A., Downs, D. S., Fleming, D. S., & Con-
Obesity, 32, 1–11. doi:10.1038/sj.ijo.0803774 naughton, D. P. (2002). Body image in middle school
Ceballos, N., & Czyzewska, M. (2010). Body image in children. Eating and Weight Disorders, 7, 244–248.
Hispanic/Latino vs. European American adolescents: doi:10.1007/bf03327463
Implications for treatment and prevention of obesity in Kimm, S., Glynn, N., Obarzanek, E., Kriska, A., Daniels,
underserved populations. Journal of Health Care for the S., Barton, B., & Liu, K. et al. (2005). Relation between
Poor and Underserved, 21, 823–838. doi:10.1353/hpu.0. the changes in physical activity and body mass index
0333 during adolescence: A multicenter longitudinal study.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2011). BMI Lancet, 366, 301–307. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66837-7
table for children and adolescents. Retrieved July 11, Lawler, M., & Nixon, E. (2011). Body dissatisfaction
2011, from www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/dnpa/healthyweight/ among adolescent boys and girls: The effects of body
assessing/bmi/00 mass, peer appearance culture, and internalization of
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral appearance ideals. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40,
sciences, (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. 59–71. doi:10.1007/s10964-009-9500-2
Collins, M. E. (1991). Body figure perceptions and prefer- Leger, L., & Lambert, J. (1982). A maximal multistage 20-
ences among preadolescent children. International Jour- m shuttle run test to predict VO2max. European Journal
nal of Eating Disorders, 10, 199–208. doi:10.1002/1098- of Applied Physiology, 49, 1–12. doi:0301-5548/82/0049/
108X(199103)10:2<199:AID-EAT2260100209>3.0.CO;2-D 0001
Contento, I. R., Basch, C., & Zybert, P. (2003). Body image, Lohman, T. G. (1992). Advances in body composition
weight and food choices of Latina women and their assessment. In T. G. Lohman (Ed.), Current issues in exer-
young children. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behav- cise science, monograph, no. 3. Champaign, IL: Human
ior, 35, 236–248. doi:10.1016/S1499-4046(06)60054-7 Kinetics Publishers.
Dinh, K. T., Roosa, M. W., Tein, J. Y., & Lopez, V. L. (2002). McCabe, M. P., & Ricciardelli, L. A. (2003). Body image
The relationship between acculturation and problem and strategies to lose weight and increase muscle
behavior proneness in a Hispanic youth sample: A lon-
738 
OLVERA, MCCARLEY, RODRIGUEZ, NOOR, AND HERNANDEZ-VALERO

among boys and girls. Health Psychology, 22, 39–46. boys’ and girls’ body satisfaction. Sex Roles, 63, 631–
doi:10.1037/0278-6133.22.1.39 644. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9872-5
McCabe, M. P., & Ricciardelli, L. A. (2004). A longitudi- Presnell, K., Bearman, S. K., & Stice, E. (2004). Risk fac-
nal study of pubertal timing and extreme body change tors for body dissatisfaction in adolescent boys and
behaviors among adolescent boys and girls. Adoles- girls: A prospective study. International Journal of Eat-
cence, 39, 145–166. ing Disorders, 36, 389–401. doi:10.1002/eat.20045
McCabe, M. P., & Ricciardelli, L. A. (2005). A longitudi- Ricciardelli, L. A., & McCabe, M. P. (2001). Self-esteem
nal study of body image and strategies to lose weight and negative affect as moderators of sociocultural
and increase muscles among children. Journal of influences on body dissatisfaction, strategies to
Applied Developmental Psychology, 26, 559–577. doi:10. decrease weight, and strategies to increase muscles
1016/j.appdev.2005.06.007 among adolescent boys and girls. Sex Roles, 4, 189–207.
Mirza, N. M., Davis, D., & Yanovski, J. A. (2005). Body doi:10.1023/A:1010955120359
dissatisfaction, self-esteem, and overweight among Rubin, L., Fitts, M., & Becker, A. (2003). “Whatever feels
inner-city Hispanic children and adolescents. Journal of good in my soul”: Body ethics and aesthetics among
Adolescent Health, 36, 267.e16–267.e20. doi: 10.1016/j. African American and Latina women. Culture, Medicine
jadohealth.2004.02.033 and Psychiatry, 27, 49–75. doi:10.1023/A:102367 9821086
Myers, T. A., & Crowther, J. H. (2007). Sociocultural pres- Ruiz, J. R., Ramirez-Lechuga, J., Ortega, F., Castro-Pi~ nero,
sures, thin-ideal internalization, self-objectification, and J., Benitez, J., Arauzo-Azofra, A., . . . Zabala, M. (2008).
body dissatisfaction: Could feminist beliefs be a moder- Artificial neural network-based equation for estimating
ating factor? Body Image, 4, 296–308. doi:10.1016/j.body- VO2max from the 20 m shuttle run test in adolescents.
im.2007.04.001 Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 44, 233–245. doi:10.
Neumark-Sztainer, D., Wall, M., Story, M., & Perry, C. L. 1016/j.artmed.2008.06.004
(2003). Correlates of unhealthy weight-control behav- Schubert, A., Janu ario, R. S., Casonatto, J., & Sonoo, C.
iors among adolescents: Implications for prevention N. (2013). Body image, nutritional status, abdominal
programs. Health Psychology, 22, 88–98. doi:10.1037/ strength, and cardiorespiratory fitness in children and
0278-6133.22.1.88 adolescents practicing sports. Revista Paulista de Pedia-
Ogden, C. L., Carroll, M. D., Curtin, L. R., Lamb, M. M., tria, 31, 71–76. doi:10.1590/S0103-058220130001 00012
& Flegal, K. M. (2012). Prevalence of obesity and Smolak, L. (2004). Body image in children and adoles-
trends in body mass index among US children and cents: Where do we go from here? Body Image, 1, 15–
adolescents, 1999–2010. Journal of the American Medical 28. doi:10.1016/S1740-1445(03)00008-1
Association, 307, 483–490. doi:10.1001/jama.2012.40 Stice, E., & Agras, W. S. (1998). Predicting onset and
Olive, L. S., Byrne, D. G., Cunningham, R. B., & cessation of bulimic behaviors during adolescence: A
Telford, R. D. (2012). Effects of physical activity, fit- longitudinal grouping analysis. Behavior Therapy, 29,
ness, and fatness on children’s body image: The 257–276. doi:10.1016/S0005-7894(98)80006-3
Australian LOOK longitudinal study. Mental Health Stice, E., & Bearman, S. K. (2001). Body image and eating
and Physical Activity, 5, 116–124. doi:10.1016/j.mhpa. disturbances prospectively predict increases in depres-
2012.08.004 sive symptoms in adolescent girls: A growth curve
Olvera, N., George, G., & Kaiser, L. (2011). My child is analysis. Developmental Psychology, 37, 597–607. doi:10.
not fat, he is just chubby. A Latino/a parenting per- 1037/0012-1649.37.5.597
spective. In R. Perez-Escamilla & H. Melgar-Quinonez Tabachnick, B. L., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate
(Eds.), At risk Latino children’s health (pp. 87–111). statistics (5th ed.) Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
Houston, TX: Arte Publico Press. Tanner, J. M. (1962). Growth at adolescence. Oxford, UK:
Olvera, N., Suminski, R., & Power, T. G. (2005). Intergen- Blackwell Scientific Publications.
erational perceptions of body size and attractiveness in Telford, R. D., & Cunningham, R. B. (2008). Reformula-
Mexican Americans: Role of gender, acculturation, and tion of BMI and percent body fat to remove the height
BMI. Obesity Research, 13, 1970–1979. doi:10.1038/oby. bias in 8-year-olds. Obesity, 16, 2175–2181. doi:10.1038/
2005.242 oby.2008.332
Parfitt, G., Pavey, T., & Rowlands, A. V. (2009). Chil- Xanthopoulos, M. S., Borradalie, K. E., Hayes, S., Sher-
dren’s physical activity and psychological health: The man, S., Vander-Veur, S., Grundy, K. M., Nachmani, J.,
relevance of intensity. Acta Paedriatica, 98, 1037–1043. & Foster, G. D. (2011). The impact of weight, sex, and
doi:10.1111/j.1651-2227.2009.01255.x race/ethnicity on body dissatisfaction among urban
Petrie, T. A., Greenleaf, C., & Martin, S. (2010). Biopsy- children. Body Image, 8, 385–389. doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.
chosocial and physical correlates of middle school 2011.04.011

You might also like