Professional Documents
Culture Documents
4
Distr:Limited
Original:English
This documentis not issuedto the generalpublic, and all rights are reservedby
the World HealthOrganization(WHO) andthe Serviceof Ecotoxicology
(ECOTOX)of the Departmentof PublicHealth,Geneva.The documentmay be
reviewed,abstracted, quoted,reproducedor translated,in part or in whole, with
the prior written permissionof WHO or ECOTOX. Partsof this documentmay
be storedin a retrievalsystemor transmittedin any form or by any means-
electronic,mechanicalor other- with the prior written permissionof WHO or
ECOTOX. The views expressed in the documentby namedauthorsare solelythe
responsibilityof thoseauthors.
Contents Page
Executivesummary vii
1.Introduction.... 1
7. Summaryandconclusions. . . 219
8. Appendices
Fundingfor this reporthasbeenprovidedby the World HealthOrganization,the
Departmentof Public Health of the Republicand Cantonof Geneva,and the
Governmentof Norwav.
The editorswould like to thankthe following peoplefor their help in the review
andpreparationof this document:
D. Calkins G. Ozolins
N. Florio J. Rabinowitz
A. Katz A. Rougemont
T. Kjellstrdm A. Stroumza
J.-Cl. Landry J. Somers
vl
EXECUTTVE SI]MMARY
This report addresses the problemsof air pollutioncreatedby the growth of motor
vehicletraffic in the developedanddevelopingcountriesof the world. The
problemis viewedwittrin the contextof sustainable development in which the
protectionof healthandof the environmentarepriority concerns.The
conclusionsandrecommendations of this reportare intendedto provideguidance
to countriesas they go throughvariousstagesof development, in the formulation
and implementation of sound policies to preventserious air pollutionproblems
ftom occurringor worsening.
vll
showsan approximate20% inqeasein risk of respiratoryillnessfor childrenwho
havean increaseof 30 y.glm3exposureover a periodof weeks(e.g. children
living in homesusingnaturalgasfor cookingas comparedto childrenliving in
homesusing electricity). Wherehigh annuallevelsof NO, of the order of
100pglm3are producedby motor vehicles,as in Los Angiles, this is a major
causeof concern.
viii
economicdevelopment andmotorizationexpectedover the next decades,this
problemwill becomeevengreater. The controlsdescribedare eithervehicle-
based,to reducethe massof pollutantsper kilometerof travel G/km) or driver-
based,to reducethe numberof kilometersof motor vehicletravel per day. The
hardwarecontrolson emissions(catalyst,enginedesign,inspectionand
maintenance etc.) are costlyanddriver incentivesto re<lucevehicleuseare not
popular. Developingcountrieswithouthigh capitalresourceswill be facedwith
challengingproblemsto developcontrolstrategiesthat are acceptable both
economicallyandsocially.
The most importantfindings of the report are set out in the summaryand
conclusions. It hasbeencleuly demonstratedthat motor vehicle air pollution can
haveseriousadversehealtheffectson the population. Theseproblemsare likely
to be particularlyacutein the rapidly growingcitiesof the developingworld if
uncontrolledgrowthof the vehiclefleet is allowedto takeplace. It is concluded
ttratplanningmustbeginnow to providefor alternatives to the motor vehicleand
to reduceemissionsof the vehiclefleetsthat the growingpopulationswill demand
astheir economicstatusimproves. It is hopedtlat this reportwill providea
rationalbasisfor administrators who are responsible for air qualitymanagement
planningto developappropriatecontrolstrategiesas they striveto achievea state
of sustainabledevelopment that doesnot adverselyaffectthe healthof the people.
lx
Chapter1
INTR.ODUCTIONl
I The editors thank Michael P. Walsh for his assistanceon this chap0er.
2
Introduction
Decisionshaveto be takenconcerningland-useplanning,masstransitconstruction
andfuel characteristics.Thesechoiceswill stronglyinfluencedevelopment over
the next 20 to 50 years. In orderto minimizefuture costsin termsof healthand
clean-up,solutionsto air pollutionproblemsneedto be found and implemented
immediately.We hopethe informationcontainedin this reportwill contributeto
thesevital initiatives.
066r
086r.
016r
096r
o
nq
6o
Ee
Ycrtn q
u\bt .9
!l cE g
zFo a
bo
ilililtil E (D
H
o
o
o
a
'o
ilt,h |
U'UI C
o
k
A
fh
o
k
bn
o n cAr q
vt u I
.9o ooooooo
=o o ooooo
(oro<f(9N
=r\
Introduction
(1,(x)O,000,0oO)
POPUIATION
VEHTCLES
{1(x),mo,O(x)l
+ CARS
+ TRUCKS& BUs$
-X- MOTOFCYCLES
+ POPULANON
E nesror
THE
1"*"---r
Figure 3. Globalmotor vehicledistribution1990.
o
UJ
o
f
o
d
efr
ed
.nu;9
/p
339
ltl
+{*
ttl
^i 066l'
il
l*
ii
]\
T 086r
iT
ix
G,
,;
€6 t
I
!
o
q
o
6
.a
I t/ h I E
o
uJ 'o
c
o
UJ
o
H
c
o
o fl
o
E +
III ,! o
c bo
o trr
]U 096l
I o oooooo
- N o6(otN
UJ
J
N5g,@e N
oooaa o
oooooo o m
-
TI
o
oe
NORTH
AMIRICA |-
m
t
(D o
!
:r, m
WESTERN
EUROPE !
J
o
o
o
EUROPI
IASITRN !
m
o
(D !
o - n ra /T\/ rrnan\ t-
Lr) \L^-u))K/ m
H
6
?
; PACIFIC
OICD
(D
o a
(D
q fi CTNTPLANNID
ASIA
€
(D
t o
o t -^,,-,
)UUIH & LA)l A)lA
5
[/IDDLI
IASI
AFRICA
AMTRICA
LATIN
J J J J J
NFg)OONAO'@
ooooooooo =
oooooooooo
=
o
a
oa o
!r (0
(e (o
-lo
6
dJ
er(o
-(o
e('l
<
g .oo
=.o
c)<
;-m
:
XF
EN
tro
FJ
to
?
N
o
N
o
lffin%lm
zoFoPv
Om
;c)(nora {
1u il o o
i E 2; s e
hvTmO
=H=-6F o
Y X =
o
JJ
f;3
-!
ON
o=
r' 1960 iilP
@ ch=
o
-o
dz
9:
F'
lll,t
ttti
o:^
.8E
o:
q rv/u
gE
E i c 5
(D
b
o
Ix6
-2 o
':.
o
(D
=' tuxll
F
EH
fr
CN
o
a
(D
! 1qq0
> itr
iE
lX
,\
o
be
H3 . F 88*e8=n
--$-
,!p g -fiRhR*eoa , EiSsa ro
N rq
:"
oX
z= x>
'8818 EE
f! E$q=-€19 E$8RsE$€FK8€$FGKS 88$t9 r EB
i.:85s38833 S;19 S€sPPsSBEs$33RsRr Sr€|fi
qt
aQhV6O$- -116 6O6€rhr--h6dN6Nor rdhlh
r
N
CQ
>; mg=-N -l N--r 6---ho-6hNo € 6lo d
dsthd6 I
gE
!l !a or@6h+Nd@dol Od - h O + 6 € - € AN h 6 r - 6 O O @l€ ::
E3 8S;+g;K338$l
.-
r h
* -€
h O
d
- €6
N 60
€O
- +
O
h€
+ +
o
F
+
@d
€oo
Q €
*
OO
N o
hlh
9t€
i
€h-€6€N€6n-l
66-N6€r€-o€l
6@€O-d - Ol
€N
ogb
N@O
O N
f
€6--
t $ r
d € -O
6O
*hdOdN6€-S
-
€
r
€ n
r *
N
r
O nd
O h€
N
h
r €
h d
F
@l-
-lO
@l+
::
-*d - -l r h-d:€r:to
$l r 6{ Btr
9E
6l
,:Y I _9>
86
g-;; ;t -^ + = -^-.: s^Et.=Y
o .'
xv
ho
rdd-ro h€r6oh€d6€*r66:.^FO--
hE €r*6ON
-6<dd6
| €-€h€r9-.ild-€r6€;Odn:;
o+$n--*N+-{66<:-'-$!
J
:€ ' - = O; *l N V ^
€
95
EFJ
\o\or*\oo I dooo-io€dhooo-oh6-*-' €l€ hor@o*+€t+ 'do
O€-6-d @O-Or-h-66OOAdO€-6\O$ *lO *ON$r@h€l€
6€t*o+ ooNo6dth€doo6roaN+h€ olh hrrOnodali
:-h€-h -OO-ff*@Ohd€€€OOhOhO rlr €*Nd-{ 6l€
9Q{€O+ rtf€OO-$6--*NOOr€O@O +lO N6N €N TI+
NS- -N Nrt€rN n6-hO-6d6 Ntd + :lr
IiNN:Ni
N {"
rx
s 3 c n $ F$ F 8 $ 8 S 3 ; 8 8 F 3 8 5 S 8 S ! $ F S e? t 3
N N F t N €€6 c)O OA H r $ N €.+ c,c)\O c) d r c'€ s€61-
-o-€€6o-rto
60€€o6Nol+
-.€6€f66-l€
<-9nNhF€OhNf €A€O6O6OOhdO€- +AOl- r € € r € n $ -od t r :t-
O-rPSh$dh6{O*-66r @O-AO6 - r -@hdl6 - F d l €
6€N-NgdOhErh€-rd*:h€d€dOhO€+-lO
--Aq-i
6 6tr
N-- -- h h-h-:doo-66tN 6m
* :
NO: N F t-
:e
.! ]o
I E? _5€ 3r s e3Jflo t*
gfsja3isagE
Zc;
gE;irE=
s:ggss:E=sssger=SEci
€|gs a !
-dF
lntroduction
HC 33,869 t3,239 39 Vo
(1000tons, 1980).
Table2. Motor vehicleshareof OECDpollutantemissions
REFEREI\CES
Motor VehiclesManufacturers'Associationof the UnitedStates,Inc. WorldMotor
VehiclesData, 1991edition.
InternationalRoadFederation.WorldRoad Staistics1986-190.
Geneva/lVashingtonD.C., 1991.
t1
Motor vehicle air pollution
BIBLIOGRAPHY
WHO. Our planet our health. Reportof the World Health Organization
Commissionon HealthandEnvironment,Geneva(1992).
t2
Chapter2
Part I
IsabelleRomieu'
Introduction
13
Motor vehicleair pollution
Nitrogen oxides
l4
Health effects of air pollution
Fuel
Engine
characteristics
Emission
controls
GENETICAND Doseto
ENVIRONMENTAL pulmonarytissues
MODIFIERS
Cellularand
o;
molecularcascade
s
. Onlyexposure inhalation
through is shown.
Source:
HEl.19BB
15
Motor vehicle air pollution
16
Health effects of air pollution
Ozoneand otherphotochemicaloxidants
17
Motor vehicleair pollution
The observedhealtheffectsofphotochemicaloxidantsexposurecannotbe
attributedonly to oxidantsbecausephotochemicalsmogtypically consistsof e,
No2, acid sulfateand otherreactiveagents. Thesepollutantsmay haveadditive
or synergisticeffectson humanhealth, but ozoneappearsto be the most
biologicallyactive(WHO, 1987b).
18
Health effects of air pollution
'lppb =
2pgtf
Source:Lippmann, 1989b
t9
Motor vehicle air pollution
100
u o UpperRespiratory
Symptoms
5
o
so r NonRespiralory
Symptoms
o a LowerRsspiratorySymptoms
>80
F
970
2"o
Hso
8+o
fl.0
F
s20
8ro d
E
0L
0 1000 2000 3000 4000
EFFECTIVE03DOSE(microgramsdeliveredin 2 hr)
20
Health effects of air pollution
ADULTS
Foli!$edd t988 l0M tE-33 Modcn& 3e5 O00) t2ff -3.t 4.5 -5.0
(40)
Gibbo0 & A&o 1984 t0F n.91.2.5' Hi8h 50 (60) r50a -t.l -t.0 {.6
(55)
Kull6 ct .l l9tj 20M 25.3*1.t' HiSh r20 (60) 4.5 4.2 -2.1
(6r) l50t
Liu 4 d 1986 24M l8-33 HiSh 120(60) 4.1 {.6 -l.l -t.l
(6r) l60t
Spoth d d l98t 20M, l0F 2214 Vricd 29.3*9,2' -1.,f -9.2 {.0
or.6134.o il-l-j,.4b
7M,3F 22-$ (64.5*10.o 26.7xt.f -3.0 -t3.1 -9.7
2t-t240
CHII-DR.EN
Lioy d d l9t5 l7 M,22F Iaw 15G550 {.1 {.3 -3.0 4.6
}Ul45b
Kimcy ct d 1988 94M,60F tut2 I.w 1440 4.9 .1.0p 1.9
7-78b
Lippum d .l 1983 34M,24 F t-13 ModcdE 15G550 4.t
,16-llob
Spckor ct d 53M,38F Modcntc 15G550 -t.0 -1.,1 {.t -2.5
l9-ll3b
Avol c d 1988 33M,33F E-tt Modcnta 60 (60) 4.3 4.4
Q2) ll3b
Avol .t .l 1985 il6 M, 13F t2-t5 High 60 (60) -0.E -t.6 4.7
Q2) l5oa
MoDo@[ ct d 1965 23M t-ll Vcry High 150(60) -0.3 {.5 -tt 4.6
oe) 12cE
'Mean
* S.D
r Ozone concentration within purified
air.
b Ozone concentration
within ambient mixturs.
o FEV0.75
+1ppb=2p.ghf
22
Healtheffectsof air pollution
23
Motor vehicle air pollution
24
Health effects of air pollution
a 0.1ppm
r 0.2ppm
o 0.3ppm
o 0.4ppm
15
LeastSquaresFit
s
-
tJ.t
u-10
z
tJl
z
I
<)5
o
3
0 500 1000 1500 2oo0 2so0 3ooo 3500 4ooo 4500 5000
EFFECTIVEOZONEDOSE(micrograms)
25
Motor vehicleair pollution
26
Health effects of air pollution
27
Motor vehicleair pollution
150
H R
125
-. T 1L
7 R
3 1oo p
KL
o ltilK
.K
3ru
E
TT
-
50 W
s
s
0 25 50 75 100 125 150
MEANTSP (pg/m3)
. The plotincludes27 region-cohorts
againstmeanTSP concentration
duringthe previousyear,with between-cities
regressionequation.
(P=Portage,T=Topeka;W=Watertown;C=Carondolet;L=otherSt Louis;
R= Steubenville Valley;K=Kingston;
Ridge;V- Steubenville H=Harriman)
Source'.Ware et al 1986
28
Health effects of air pollution
29
Motor vehicleair pollution
24-hourmeanexposureto:
total
Soz smoke suspended thoracic
Effect particulates particles
(pglm3) 0rglm3) @eh'f) Qtgtm3)
Excessmoftality 500 500
Increasedacute
respiratorymorbidity 250 250
(adults)
Source:WHO, 1987c
Table5. levelsof
Summaryof effectson humanhealthof lowest-observed-effect
sulfur dioxideandparticulatematter(long-termexposure).
Annualmeanexposureto:
total
Soz smoke suspended
Effect particulates
0.g/rn3) @elt13) @gkrr3)
Increasedrespiratory 100 100
symptomsor illness
Source:WHO, 1987c
30
Health effects of air pollution
Aci.daerosols
It is well established
in animalexperiments and controlledhumanstudiesthat acid
aerosolshavea deleteriouseffecton respiratoryhealth. Lippmann(1989c)
reviewedrecentlythe stateof knowledgeof theseeffects. Alterationof lung
functions,particularlyincreasein pulmonaryflow resistance occursafter acute
exposure.Sulfuricacid (H2SOa)appqusto be morepotentthan any of the sulfate
saltsin term of increasedairway irritancy(WHO, 1987c). Acid aerosolshave
alsobeenshownto modify particleclearancealthoughthe mechanismis not yet
well established (Folinsbee,1989).
3I
Motor vehicle air pollution
CarbonMonoxide
32
Health effects of air pollution
Source:WHO, 1987d
33
Motor vehicle air pollution
34
Health effects of air pollution
Carboxyhemoglobin
concenEation(%) Effects
<5 No statisticallysignificantvigilancedecrementsafter
exposureto carbonmonoxide
Source:WHO,1987d
lzad
The contributionof alkyl lead additivesin motor fuels accountsfor the maior part
of all inorganicleademissions.An estimated80-90Vo of lead in ambientair
derivesfrom the combustionof leadedpetrol. The degreeof pollutionfrom this
sourcediffers from countryto country,dependingon motor vehicledensityand
efficiencyof effortsto reducethe leadcontentof petrol (WHO, 1987e). About
l% of thelead in petrol is emittedunchanged astetraalkyllead(organiclead).
Thereis in addition,someevaporationof organicleadfrom the engineand fuel
tank. Concentration of tetraalkylleadamountingto morethan 10%of the total
lead contentof ambientair hasbeenmeasuredin the immediatevicinity of service
stations(NSIEM, 1983). The WHO guidelinevaluefor long-termexposure(e.g
annualaverage)to leadin the air is 0.5-1.0pglm3(WttO, 1987e).
35
Motor vehicle air pollution
36
Health effects of air pollution
MITOCHONDRION
HEME
APb
{1
",J,5?lS
tv
AMINOLEVULINIC
ACID
(ALA)
ALA I COPBOPORPHYRIN
DEHYDRASEF- pb (INCREASE)
(DEoREASE)
|
Y .
PORPHOBILINOGEN
Source:EPA. 1986
ffiosxts
exposureis alsoassociated
wittr a decrease of
in the biosynthesis
l,25{ihydroxyvitamin D, an importantmetaboliteof vitaminD (Mahaffeyet al.,
1982).
37
Motor vehicleair pollution
38
Health effects of air pollution
Cord-bloodlead group
Groupe de plomb6miecordale
120 a--O Low-Faible mean = 146 uo/l
A - l! lvledium-Moyenne mean = 180 utl
O--.o' High-Elev6e mean = 650 ug/1
.)
0)
3 rre
X
o
;
o I
v
dt tz
o
q,
o
o
6
5 108
f
104
s
6121824
Age at testing (months) -
39
Motor vehicle air pollution
lineof bestfit
r'o
.
Cnanoe = |
l--
M e a ns c o r e= 1 0 7 . 1
7.2 u"nits ,ou
|
I
100
40
Health effects of air pollution
4l
Motor vehicle air pollution
80 Frank anemia
60 Femalo
reproduc$ve
effect6
30 Elevated bl@d
presre (white
males, aged t10-59)
25-30 Erythrtryte
protoporphyritr
(EP) elevation in
males
t5-20 Erytbrcyte
protoporphyria
@P) elevation in
females
I pg/dl - I0 pgll
Source: ATSDR,1990
42
Health effects of air pollution
Lowest-obs€rved-
effect level (PbB)r Hemc syntbesisaad Neurological and Gastroirtestinal
tpgldl) hematologicaleffects related effects ReDAlsyslem effects effects
60 Peripheral
neuropatb.ies
50 ?
30 Vit.nin D
metabolism
inl,erfemco
Py-S-iS activity ,
inhibitioo
opy-S-N = Pyrimidine-5'-nucleotidase.
lp.gldl = l0 pgll
Source:ATSDR, 1990
43
Motor vehicle air pollution
Benzene
44
Healtheffectsof air pollution
5
G-up l: The agent is carcinogenic to humans. This category is used only when there is
sufficient evidence of carcinogenicity in humans. That ig a positive relationship has been obsenred
between exposure to the agent and cancer in which chance, bias and confounding could be ruled out
with reasonableconfidence.
45
Motor vehicle air pollution
6 Gro,rp 2A. The agent is probably carcinogenic to humans. There is limited evidence
ofcarcinogenicity in humans and sufficient evideuce ofcarcinogenicity in experimental
animals.
46
Health effects of air pollution
Aldehydes
4'1
Motor vehicle air poilution
4. Conclusions
However,despitetheselimitations,thesemathematical
modelshavegreat
advantages:
48
Health effects of air pollution
REFERENCES
49
Motor vehicle air pollution
choie, D.D. & Richter,G.w. Effectsof leadin the kidney. ln: Lead roxicity.
Singhal,R.L. & Thomas,J.A., eds.,UrbanandSchwarzenberg, Baltimore,
pp. 337-350(1980).
50
Health effects of air pollution
following
Damji, K.S. & Richters,A. Reductionof T lymphocytesubpopulations
Research,49:2t7-224
acuteexposureto 4 ppm nitrogendioxide. Environmental
(1e8e).
D.J. Leadandchilddevelopment.Nature,329:
Davis,M.J. & Svendsgaard,
297-3W(1987).
tindings at 6
Dietrich, K.N. eJal. Early eft'ectsof leadexposure:neurobehavioral
months. lntcntutionalJournalof BiosocialResearch,8: 151-168(1986).
51
Motor vchicle air pollution
Folinsbee,
I-.J. Humanhealtheffectsof exposure to airborneacid.
Environme
ntal Health Perspectives, 79: 195-199( I 989).
52
Health effects of air pollution
53
Motor vehicle air pollution
54
Ilealth effects ofair pollution
f)
Motor vehicleair pollution
56
Health effects of air pollution
57
Moior vehicleair pollution
Shy, C.M. Lead in petrol: the mistakeof the XXth century. WorldHealth
StaisticsQuarterly,43: 168-176(1990).
58
Health effects of air pollution
Smith, M. et al. The effectsof lead exposureon urban children: the Institute of
Child Health/ SouthamptonStudy. Developmentsin Medical Cltild Neurology,
25(suppl47) (1983).
60
Health effects of air pollution
World HealthOrganization.Photochemical
oxidants. Geneva,WHO, 1978
@nvironmentalHealthCriteria No. 7).
World HealthOrganization.Polycyclicaromatichydrocarbons
@AH's). In: Air
Quality Guidelines
for Europe. Copenhagen,
WHO RegionalOffrcefor Europe,
19879(WHO RegionalPublications,EuropeanSeriesNo. 23).
6t
Motor vehicleair pollution
62
Chapter2
Part II
RagnarRylander"
Introduction
RagnarRylander,Profqssorin EnvironmentalMedicine,Universityof
Gothenburg,Sweden
63
Motor vehicle air pollution
A
lfjegy employedfor evaluatingthe impactof an exposureto noise, can
suitablyborrow terminologyfrom the field of toxicology. The broadintegrated
processof risk assessment,
is describedby the following elements:
- Dosedescription:the level of the agentmustbe describedin a way that is
appropriatewith regardto the effectsobserved.
&
Health effects of environmental noise
- or
Hazud identification:this is the qualitativeindicationthat a substance
condition may adverselyeffect humanhealth or well being. It may
representa very wide assessment of possiblerisks.
Dose description
65
Motor vehicleair pollution
Sources I.evel
Normal conversation 65
Quiet suburbanstreet 55
Thresholdfor sleepdisturbance 45
Very quietroom 30
'Uncomfortably"
quiet 15
Hearing thre,shold 0
ffi
Health effects of environnental noise
67
o
q
Y
rH
k
a
c)
bo
Health effects of environmentalnoise
that the L", value of 65 dBA is presentat a site, far away from the road where the
noiselevelsfrom individualvehicles,evenvery noisyones,is very low
@igure2). The critical factor in the situationdascribedaboveis the numberof
events. To what extentthen is the numberof eventsrelatedto the human
perceptionof environmental stimuli?
ffi 75dB(A)
10 000 vehicle" '_
5'^' 65ciB(A)
\ r"c= 65 dB(A)
\
69
Motor vehicleair potrlution
Hazard identification
Fhysical efferts
70
Health effects of environmental noise
Physiological effects
7l
Motor vehicle air pollution
72
Heglth effects of environmental noise
Sleepdisturbance
73
Motor vehicle air pollution
A goodcorrelationwasfoundbetweenEEG definedsleepdisturbanceandpeak
noiselevel, but no correlationwasfoundbetweenthe durationof noiseand sleep
disturbance.The percentage increasedwhenpeaknoiselevels
of responses
increasedabove45 dBA. Subjectswere not wokenup by noisebelow 52 dB peak
level. About25% of noiseeventsat 70 dBA causedsleepinterference.There
werethreetimesas manydisturbances by roadtraffrc noiseas by railway noise
for the sameL* value (meannoiselevel).
74
Health effects of environmental noise
was still thereat the endof the testperiod. Moreover,an increasein fatigue
(mostlyin the non-sensitive persons)and a reduceddegreeof extroversion(mostly
for the sensitivepersons)couldbe registeredtowardsthe endof the periodof
noiseexposure.Both groupsperformedworsein performance tests,andthis
deteriorationtendedto continuetowardsthe endof the period.
Amongpersonsliving alongnoisyroads,instantimprovements
in subjectivesleep
quality.havebeenreportedwhenwindowswerenoise-insulated
(Wilkinsonet al.,
1980;OhrstrdmandBj<irkman,1983).
Studieson sleepinterference
dueto noiseagreethat the mostimportantexposure
parameteris peaknoiseduringnight hours. As effectsare generallyreportedat
levelsfrom 45 dBA peaklevel indoors,largepartsofthe populationin our cities
arethus regularlyexposedto noiselevelswhich interferewith their sleep.
Psychologicaleffects
75
Motor vehicle air pollution
development
couldbe accelerated in predisposedpersonsor symptomscould
appeartemporarilyunderparticularconditions.
76
Health effects of environmental noise
Annoyance
77
Motor vehicle air pollution
78
Health effects of environmental noise
Conclusion
79
Motor vehicle air pollution
80
Health effects of environmental noise
REFERENCES
8l
Motor vehicle air pollution
82
Health effects of environmental noise
Health
World HealthOrganization.Noise. Geneva,WHO, 1980@nvironmental
CriteriaNo. 12).
83
CHAPTER 3
PeterG. Flachsbart'
Introduction
85
Motor vehicleair pollution
Direct Approach
86
Human exposure to motor vehicle air pollutants
87
Motor vehicle air pollution
C-ommuter
Studies
Indirect Approach
88
Humanexposureto motor vehicle air pollutants
MeanIn-Vehicle MeanAmbient
Air Pollutant Concentration Concentration
OrganicGases
Metals
89
Motor vehicle air pollution
StandardizedRoutes
90
Human exposureto motor vehicle air pollutants
91
Motor vehicle air pollution
Privateautomobile 55 - 57 ppm 34
'Combi" type van
39 - 67 ppm 35
Minibus 32 - 64 ppm t52
Dieselbus 20 - 40 ppm 170
Electrictrolleybus 22 -32ppm 47
Subwayandlight rail 16-26ppm 111
92
Human exposureto motor vehicle air pollutants
CarbonMonoxide Hydrocarbon
(ppm)
Concentration (ppm)
Concentration
Mean Range Mean Range
Intersections
Queues
93
Motor vehicle air pollution
Tunnelsand Underpas
ses
94
Human exposureto motor vehicle air pollutants
surveyed25 businessoutletsfor
FlachsbartandBrown (1989)systematically
employeeexposureto CO on the groundlevel of the Ala MoanaShoppingCenter
95
Motor vehicle air pollution
Benzene 9 2l 5 4
Carbonmonoxide 4300 l 1000 4000 2000
Ethylenedichloride 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
Formaldehyde 4 34 36 20
m-/p-xylenes 13 43 9 9
Toluene 36 49 26 29
Curb-sidesin CommercialAreas
96
Human exposureto motor vehicle air pollutants
97
Motor vehicle air pollution
PerpendicularDistancefrom Roads
Indoor-Outdoor Relationships
Estimatesof PeopleExposed
98
Human exposureto motor vehicle air pollutants
99
Motor vehicleair pollution
100
Human exposure to motor vehicle air pollutants
€5 <€;t qaqR
F \ ^
s.R i $.ls.qH eflas.qaeJa il8.
zbu
El r \ o c r c . s l3 !i ,^'ol! s3s-ls ll€
(
siF.El s€81€ Eq€eq6 qnEqq qqqqE ile
*;dlg s id c t = d l $ - ' : - : r 6 i l \ d i:"ddli
EESEI ilg
bo
6.)
cr 8l
6 trtl c-i-ralo\ 6to66lr €moolo\ \o!ao@l 6 ll@
d O al t\o-lc\ oott\o€l 6l EhhNlO\ ttl..\OlC.l llN
f i'al c|o\-l o ortrrol F- \oo\rhl 6 oFraoll o\ llo\
5 FO\Cll -\ -h-l \O FhFFI r
- - i xpl x l -v.r
6
\ora \o
t FO@O\l
rt otFrorl co
116
lF 16 m('|cltl llo\
i{ EF l€ c.l tr r- (?r6e.r l@
a - l-' illc.l
lq
d
:6oll \O \ @
PX
k{x !?l
-.El oH ,!q.
6-OFl
N
\o
,h
r^sl\aFl o\
,r
GIO\tcrl
ic{ ,m
llo\ t*>
il! vv
{
EEI '=
! ' ix $
+
JTIE (l Sc')
.s .s F-
EE
(l(Jo.
FJ tiig
E5 E 5e lri' 5 E 5e
tI di
$s
.\{
a
6
&l
;l Ef H * :q E € : , E -g
sse
::-
H El €E F = o
E
.
=
o E EE NE;
B :l :s f E !* \fN tr
<<€
F-
F
(.)
fl:,iiE,islfiiul*lgi* o
;fiF=
gFFa
€r>;
101
ots
Motor vehicle air pollution
Numbers of RoadsideExposures
ro2
Human exposure to motor vehicle air pollutants
il o
6
rd'F
d
q q q !19
*l s
d
e
alll- Io
Iq
ll<)
d c.l ..1 lr il:
!{q.c >l
;oorl
^o
;,{.i6l$"{14 a"9n$.fle
:H S lS
sqqqq snq$J$ti{
q
Ril lF
t5uqc! 3 =-e=l$ n3;=lS ll+ -66 l@
a) 2.a.e ll:
fi5
= a ! >t - o r-.t @ r @ \o 6le \a F
q q q 9s e l \ 6 Flal o\ € 6 Nl e{ ilo
;"{i al :::l:
N 'c{
- f) O @ Ol \a
rH l q- \ lHn *l r,
! g:
F- O\ +
ql\
Ol -
In
ilc
llc)
!
F
$'>i tl ll9
F E S'El3
tr,v c{
lo r
FI
F
#5€E3R:RI; EfrEHiI€
.:r Jlr -1"
HNSH$ HSE$IRflN
5 5 1 : Fi Il A ,? qi e a]j a j$ -1,{i ll.i
€r {6o\bt@
223}-" e 3 " i1
l t r3 R l3 **i-l:
C) .FAEcE
ll:
>.'
Fgg,E$ 'o
El tr'tr'ih
il Ed E do E (5 ; ci
.91 tii 9 ur rii 9 di _g
6
;lc l €:
!a
E
i
*€ :i H
5
€
!
:; €
=
;F
E
3| ;; : T In -E = : = r.e
E: E€ 3
:Ix :E = : E€ E : E !:pi*
00
o
slsgl; tsr*:* isE*: f
F filiE?5 itxnis $tx,i5 E"x;tE I
103
Motor vehicle air pollution
Conclusion
104
Human exposure to motor vehicle air pollutants
bo
u;3Fg
3F1B
s*-a1tiiBx|:ip*$lR
:J il3
O
tr
Q
rrl
q er!q*l O\ olQ!!@91 @q\\aO\l r
€Egl qqqE 8.{3;-ela c^8.€-sJq
9Al
s^qeslq
F 6\OC\@trt il-
E55E
E€€,tr
Br ?d E 3 E 5 u E
H !r t s ? i * €
gE
q
ilA sl E
gE 5 € :. E r E :.
rrl
EE5 : E ,* Ej
o\
c) EIEsI!xs;*;* Es.Is;fEs;a 3
Eli5x5JEEIESE
rIlJ
EqiEE
5
f,.i;Ee
E
!6
L1
105
Motor vehicle air pollution
106
Humenexposureto motor vehicle air pollutants
REFERENCES
t07
Motor vehicle air pollution
Flachsbart,P. Effectiveness
of priority lanesin reducingtravel time and carbon
monoxideexposure. Institute of TransportationEngineersJournal, 59:.4145
(1e8e).
108
Human exposureto motor vehicle air pollutants
in
Flachsbart,P. & Ott, W. A rapid methodfor surveyingCO concentrations
high-risebuildings. EnvironmentInternational,12: 255-264(1986).
109
Motor vehicleair pollution
Organizationfor EconomicCo-operation
andDevelopment.Citiesand transport.
OECD,Paris,France,(1988).
110
Hunranexposureto motor vehicle air pollutants
of benzeneand someother
Seifert,B. & Abraham,H. Indoor air concentrations
aromatichydrocarbons.Ecotoxicologicaland EnvironmentalSafery,6: 190'192
(1e82).
111
Motor vehicle air pollution
Lt2
Human exposure 0o motor vehicle air pollutants
113
Chapter4
MichaelP. Walsh"
115
Motor vehicle air pollution
Strategy Analysis
VehiclePerformance
VehicleBuild - New
116
Control measuresand their effectiveness
VehicleBuild - UsefulLife
ProperMaintenance
1t7
Motor vehicle air pollution
Owner Incentive
MarketplaceAbility
118
Control measures and their effectiveness
FueI hmposition
119
Motor vehicle air pollution
r20
Control measuresand their effectiveness
Thoughgenerallypoliticallylessacceptable,
suchapproaches tendto promotefuel
conservation,canaid in urbanrenewal,andrepresentthe only mobilesource
controlmeasureremainingoncevehiclecontroltechnologyhasbeenpushedto its
limits.
Strateg5rEvaluation
t2r
Motor vehicle air pollution
t22
Control measuresand their effectiveness
Schedule/ Sequence
123
Motor vehicle air pollution
Electronics
With so manyinterrelatedenginedesignandoperatingvariablesplayingan
increasinglyimportantrole in the modernengine,the control systemhas takenon
increasedimportance. Modificationsin sparktiming must be closely coordinated
with air-fuel ratio changesand degreesof EGR lest significantfuel economyor
performancepenaltiesresultfrom emissionsreductions,or NO, emissionsincrease
as CO goesdown. In addition,controlswhich canbe muchmoreselective
t24
Control measuresand their effectiveness
Therefore,electronicshavebegunto replacemoretraditionalmechanicalcontrols.
For exanple, electroniccontrol can optimize ignition timing under all engine
conditionsand hasthe addedadvantageof reducedmaintenanceand improved
durability comparedwith mechanicalsystems. When coupledwith electronic
control of EGR, it has beendemonstratedthat NO* emissionscan be reducedwith
no fuel economypenaltyand in somecaseswith improvedfuel economy.
Exhaust afrer-treatrnentdevices
Whenstringentexhaustemissionsstandards or nitrogen
(especiallyhydrocarbons
oxides)are madecompulsory,exhaustafter-treatmentdevicessuchas catalytic
converterstend to be usedto supplementenginemodifications.
SpecialProblemsWith Two-StrokeEngines
125
Motor vehicle air pollution
126
Control measuresand their effectiveness
127
Motor vehicle air pollution
Petrol Vehicles
128
Control measures and their effectiveness
l. Requireall new modelsof light duty vehiclesby July 1992nd all new cars
after 1 January1993to meetemissionstandards roughlyequivalentto US
1987levelsQ.72 elkmCO, 0.97 g/km of HC plusNO,,,0.14 g/km of
particulatesfor Type Approval,3.16 g/km CO, 1.13g/km for HC plus NO*,
0.18 g/km particulatesfor Conformityof Production),
r29
Motor vehicle air pollution
In summary,the in-useexhaustemissionperformancehasimproved
substantiallysincethe introductionof computercontrolledclosed-loopsystems
in 1981. GM's 1986modelyearperformanceis belowthe Federalstandards,
on average,at 50,000miles. Additionalimprovements, especiallyfor CO,
are desired.
UnitedStates
130
Control measuresand their effectiveness
Canada
Japan
13r
Motor vehicle air pollution
EuropeanCommunity
r32
Control measuresand their effectiveness
SeveralotherEuropeancountrieshavebeencooperativelymovingtowardmore
significantdieselparticulaterequirements.Swedenhasalreadyadoptedthe US-
EPA passenger car standardto go into effectin 1989andSwitzerlandandAustria
arelikely to do so in the nearfuture. In Austria,a maximumpermissiblelimit for
particulateemissionsof 0.373g/km (0.6 gramsper mile) is alreadyprescribed.
133
Motor vehicle air pollution
134
Control measuresand their effectiveness
(CurrentStatus)
Summaryof Europeanheavyduty dieselrequirements
r35
Motor vehicle air pollution
136
Control measures and their effectiveness
REIIERTNCES
Wyczalek. Two-Strolce
EngineTechnology
in the 19X)'s. Containedin SP-849,
Two-StrokeEngineDesignandDevelopment.SAE 910663(March 1991).
t37
Chapter5
*
David T. Mage, Scientist,World HealthOrganization,Geneva,Switzerland.
139
Motor vehicle air pollution
r€;,,,Banlkok,,Manild;,
...i...,.'.llvlo.iltoting..dtta..Chow..$+{..aii...qualiry..in,Siilg
: and rakarta are not at*ays acceptabteaccordingto thb country's
ambientair quality sandards.":Thepollutantsof concernare directly or
.. indiiectly causedby motorvehicles, They |re suspended particulate
,, mtuers (SP$; Car-bq*mbnoxide (CO) andlead. LCvelsof CO were
Grt ...fi...be..as...high...as.i.95...pp
i..t..,iiiif i..!il...Ja*l'rs't..49.i.BpRi..in..H
.:Yai'i.(clty
i
ei:.s6 ,.of..i|htmA)...0n.....l...
.1.1,;,.,.iin.i ,.,anffie:..i.'..c.. fidfi..dn..
e:l.ffibieilti*Fllqudi$iiiudsl:*#;
i:il:i:::idr*[:ippllluffil:lu$Ufiryllleffii:i
'
,, ,
.,,..bttnt'n'*ufednear,roadwtt'rt, ,,,. , ,
1...,..S:0ui'ce:...'i.'1t:'.!Aii.1P'1ution..P.iobr.1$..bid',Manag.e.nent:i..ih:!Asian]:i:::]i::.::::::
.. ' 'Countriest;::KirtVanichr,,ranicfi
am Middfeton;Air :
,
". ',, '. : :::PoitutibnCdntrof AsociationPaper8G33,+,June19t6,
1rm
Casestudiesof cities around the world
A 2t.4 5.3 8l
G 9.4
J 5.1 63.3
141
Motor vehicleair pollution
I rhe InternationalProgramme
on chemicalSafety,a cooperativeprogramme
of ILO, UNEP, andWHO is in the processof assessing the humanhealthand
ecotoxicrisks of motor vehiclefuels (petrol,diesel,alcohols)and exhaust
emissions.The assessment will includefuels and exhaustemissionsas complex
mixtureswith consideration of importantchemicalconstituents.
r42
Case studies of cities around the world
143
Motor vehicle air pollution
r44
Casestudiesof cities around the world
t45
Motor vehicle air pollution
kposure Measurements
146
Case studies of cities around the world
New Vehicles
147
Motor vehicleair pollution
EmissionStandards
for Mexico in g/mile
HC CO Nox
'89 Cars,no
trucks 3.20 35.2 3.68
'90 Cars
2.88 28.8 3.20
GVW'up to 6,012lbs. (1) 3.20 35.2 3.68
GVW 6,013- 6,614lbs.(2) 4.80 56.0 5.60
'91 Cars
l.t2 tl.2 2.24
GVW up to 6,012lbs.(1) 3.20 35.2 3.68
GVW 6,013- 6,614lbs.(2) 4.80 56.0 5.60
'92 Cars
t.t2 tI.z 2.24
GVW up to 6,012lbs.(1) 3.20 3s.2 3.68
GVW 6,013-6,614lbs. (2) 3.20 35.2 3.68
'93 Cars
0.40 3.4 1.00
GVW up to 6,0L2lbs. (1) 3.20 35.2 3.68
GVW 6,013- 6,614lbs.(2) 3.20 3s.2 3.68
'94 Cars
0.40 3.4 1.00
GVW up ta 6,0L2lbs.(1) 1.00 14.0 2.30
GVW 6,013-6,614lbs.(2) 1.00 14.0 2.30
* GrossVehicleWeight
(1) CommercialVehicles(i.e. NissanVan & Combis)
(2) Light Dury Trucks
when thesestandards go into full effect, Mexicowill be the first Latin American
country to introducecars meetingUS standards.
148
Casestudiesof cities around the world
Inspectionand Maintenance
I/M is a critical elementin maximizingthe success of both new car controland in-
usevehicleretrofit as well as a sourceof significantdirect emissionsreductions.
Becauseit potentiallyaffectseveryonewho drives, it mustbe implemented
carefully;for the samereason,it hasbeenthe mostpolitically controversialof the
"shortterm" motor vehiclestrategies underreview
Becauseof fearsover the public reaction,the only firm decisiontakenat ttris time
wasto makeinspections of official vehiclesandthoseinvolvedin transportingthe
public obligatory.
Fuels
149
Motor vehicleair pollution
150
Casestudiesof cities around the wodd
tighteningof petrol-powered
Progressive automotiveemissions
Year CO HC No*
US CARB US CARB US CARB
Source:M. Walsh
151
Motor vehicle air pollution
a) reducinghydrocarbona-ndNO* emlssionstandards
by 80% and50%
respectivelyfrom the 1990levels,
r52
Casestudiesof cities around the world
CleanFuels Progran
153
Motor vehicle air pollution
Motorqcles
In Use Controls
Diesels
154
Case studies of cities around the world
t55
Motor vehicle air pollution
156
Casestudiesof cities around the world
Inspectionand Maintenance(I/M)
I/M programshavebeendemonstrated
to lower emissionsfrom existingvehicles
in two ways;
r57
lll
v, o
z =
o
o o
e, z
o
C)
o z
G
o o
o
E
o s
ct
c.i SS
Nq\
G'
J4
s J
a0
c!
o
$
h
k
ch lu
UJ bo
o o o
x x ()
o o (t)
zl! 6
o z O
o
o 00 >|
0c t o
F
z C) q'\ a
o
r|\
u?
o
()
bo
Eti
F6 a
v,T, i I
o sSIS
ul ETIffi
&
J
bo
E
f
IIJ l.L
L
bo
o 6)
() q)
{)
O
E
c)
o-
>l
9
z o
E
(t
E
o lrl
e.l
ci)
bo
LL
s s
q
s qG' \f
tt,
tro LIJ
o
z
o xo s
@
E z I
o o
() E
o
E
z
o o
dl
G,
()
s
u?
ro
ct
fil
k
ct)
tr
o IIJ L
trJ o
o o oo
c)
x x
o o a
o
zIIJ o o
(9 z a
c,
o o
lll >r
E E I
F IA
E
z o o
a
ar7
E
Irl
ci
G)
k
a
bo
th
ox
-cG(/,
oFo
=v
.Fi7d' g
o
O
E.e
T 2
69
E
l! ooEz
ETIffi
(t
(l
-o
d
a
v,
a
UJ h
F DO
c)
fil
f CJ
C) 6)
(J
F
t o)
o-
s >\
0q I
9 {,
tr
z o)
a
(' {,
0c
o trl
.+
c)
a
bo
.,.
3000
J4
J
Thousands tons per year bo
E
80
q
6.)
70
bo
C)
fil
60
.a
50 L
r:
()
40
o
30 (t
F
20
(l
a
10 c)
o
0
rn
Base Base l/M MC Stds O.15pb CNG CarlTruck (t)
k
0.3S Buses Stds
oo
600
500
400
300
200
100
o
CNG Car/Truck
(!
Buses Stds
Gt
D
10 c
o
O
8
(J
(!t
6 a
F
RI
4
c
t
2
0 \o
(.)
l/M MC Stds 0.15Pb cNG Car/Truck k
,
0.3S Buses Stds b0
Motor vehicleair pollution
Petrol
Diesel Fuel
Sulfur Content
154
Casestudiesof cities around the world
Aromatic Hydrocarbons
Fuel Additives
165
Motor vehicle air pollution
Natural Gas
t6
Casestudiesof cities aroundthe wodd
Alcohol Fuels
Methanolhasmanydesirablecombustionand emissionscharacteristics,
including
goodleancombustioncharacteristics,
low flametemperature(leadingto low NO*
emissions)zurdlow photochemical
reactivity.
Emissions
t67
Motor vehicleair pollution
Conclusions
Over the last forty years,the globalvehiclefleet hasgrown from under50 million
to more than 500 million, andthereis everyindicationthat this growth will
continue. Over the next twentyyears,the globalfleet could doubleto one billion.
Unlesstransportationtechnologyandplanningare fundamentallytransformed,
emissionsof greenhouse andotherpollutinggasesfrom thesevehicleswill
continueto increase,manyrelativelycleanenvironments will deteriorate,andthe
few areasthat havemadeprogresswill seesomeof their gainseroded.
168
Case sh.rdiesof cities around the wodd
169
Motor vehicleair pollution
REFEREI\CES
170
Casestudiesof cities aroundthe world
171,
Chapter6
t73
Motor vehicle air pollution
Frrnce
GENEVA
l0tm
2
In 1814the Republicand Cantonof Genevajoined the SwissConfederation.
t74
Casestudy of Geneva
Nation
................ and canton
borders
rnner and (
l
niddle rings
r----=-=-==--
E Rivers U
t
fr
f14
r.i'
,i..
la
AJ
1a
\
, a
o
Figure 2. Tlte Genevatraffic plan is a "crown" type, with an inner ring, a middle
ring and a bypassmotorway. The built up areasare shownin black.
175
Moior vehicle air pollution
Genevain brief 3
The areaof the Canton,not includingthe Lake of Geneva,is 246 km2. The
populationis concentratedin the city of Genevaand in somesurrounding
conrmuneswherenew settlements havebeenbuilt, mainly in the 1960sand 1970s
(Figures2 and 3). some 80% of the population(1989data)live in an area
representinglessthan a quarterof the Canton, and90Toofjobs are concentrated
here(1985data).
300000
250000
200000
\' -dM"a
150000
ato'
100000
soo00
o #
1850 1860 1870 1880 1 9 1 0 1 9 2 0 1 9 3 0 1 9 4 0 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990
YEAR
3 Servicecantonalde statistique,
Genbve,variousyears.
176
Casestudy of Geneva
TUTTGART
ALLEMAGNE
AUTRICHE
FRANCE
GRENOBLE
/\tz-
Figure 4. Genevalinks with the Europeanmotorway nefiilork.
t77
Motor vehicle air pollution
Public Agriculture,
administrations, Industry,arts and
diplom crafts, energy
Building and civil
Otherservices engineering
Vegetables,
toes and beets
Figure6. Agricultural
production
in thecantonof Geneva
(scs, l99l).
178
Case study of Geneva
Woodland and
Buih-upareasand
publicworks
Parksand
recreationalareas
\-.--.------
Agricultural land
t79
Motor vehicleair pollution
Motor traffic
65
YEAR
180
Casestudyof Geneva
200000
150000
100000
+ Private cars
-*- Total numbet of vehicles
s0000
0
1975 1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989
Figure 10. Traffic flows (numberof vehiclesper da1) at the bordersof the
Canton,on the mainroutesinto the city andon the bl idgesover the Rhone(SCS,
variousyearsandOffice destransportset de la circulrtion (OTC), 1988).
181
Motor vehicle air pollution
Urban transport
182
Ca.sestudy of Geneva
40000
20000
YEAR
The concernto reducetraffic within the city of Genela hasled to two major road
projects:a motorwaybypassingthe city and a lake crossingby bridgeor tunnel.
183
Motor vehicle air pollution
Network of passivesamplers
184
Case study cf Ganeva
600
f-r.r"'""--
--* Garouge l
500 I -'*":__J I
l_l
400
300
200
raa
0
60 65 70 75 80 85 90
YEAR
Figure 12. Trendsin the annualflux of sulfurdioxid: (SQ)measuredby three
passivesamplersrepresentative
of urban(ItOtelde Ville), suburban(Carouge)and
rural (Landecy)environments(ECOTOX, 1991).
185
Motor vehicle air pollution
I-egal context
186
Case study of Geneva
187
#
B
q)
u
o
&
c)
tr
a
G
q
9
o
E
(D
k
)
(^
€
o
€
k
E
CI
!<
bo
€
B
+
(l)
!
oo
Case study of Geneva
1 pgh# (arithmetic
Cadmium (Cd) in suspended particulate \nnusl M man)
mtter
ln no/m3 \nnul mro (arithmetic mean)
Deposited particulate matter (total) 200 mglmz. dty .\nnul mru (arithmetic mean)
mtier
Znc (7a) in deposited particulale matief 4 o op g l & ' d ^ y ,\nnual mean (arithmetic mean)
pglm3
8O r'*
70 1
60 f--
50 t--..----
40+ ^
30|.:
20
10
o
190
Casestudy of Geneva
Ozone(O3)
In the caseof co andSo2 the oPair limit valuesare being' or shortly will be,
compliedwith (Table2). On the otherhand,this is lar from beingthe casefor
ozoneand nitrogendioxide. In summertimethe ozoneconcentrations very
frequentlyexceedthe hourly limit value for t:oncentration.
ambient Figure 16
showsa typical exampleof the pattern of on
concentrations a sunny day.
191
Motor vehicleair pollution
14 16 18 20 2i
nol,
192
Case study of Geneva
Information
The bulletincontains:
r93
Motor vehicleair pollution
I-egal context
t94
Case studv of Geneva
(EIA)
Environmentalimpact assessment
Generallimitation of emissions
Theanti-pollutionplan
195
Motor vehicle air pollution
Theair qualirymanagement
plan
Introduction
Principle of evaluation
196
Case study ofGeneva
NTRATIONS
Division of tasks
197
Motor vehicle air pollution
MAPoF
q:17
/ l
oF
TMoDEr \
\EMtSStONS/
\,/
198
Casestudyof Geneva
Model of emissions
0uestions Sptrifications
Table3. Requisitespecifications
for the numericalmrdel.
t99
Motor vehicle air pollution
Map of emissions
Transpon
Heatingplant
200
Case study of Geneva
Model of emissions
20r
X
td
7-r
x
rn
ol
o
f\.
'tq
€<
I3
-J6
\-A @
o\
\nc
* on
nilmm '=
ffiilttr 3
t,9
oE
ffix
ffi5
cn5
aA
rn .?
cl
c)
ma
m= x
C)
bo
\n9
tc
.€
f]*,
o(
o
k
bo
Case study of Geneva
RoadTraffic
Air traffic
Heatinginstallations
Total
Introduction
203
Motor vehicle air pollution
204
Case study of Geneva
Anti-pollution measures
Introduction
Guidingprinciples
205
A
X
F
C)
C'
6)
4)
o
,oo:'
t\
fi
d
U
o
*ih
h
@
€
o\
t4
(.)
0.)
O
k
-'.?;\
ffi
c)
rc
x
E
ff (D
bo
v
o
oo
H
o)
o o oooo
(o|J)!t('N
o ooooo
lot(9N
al ct
o o
z
ffiffiffiH8 bo
It
Casestudy of Geneva
207
Motor vehicle air pollution
Trffic management
208
Case study of Geneva
trafficplan. (Source:Cffrcedestransportset de la
Figure21. Radial/concentric
dejusticeet police,Genbv'e.
circulation,Ddpartement r
209
Motor vehicle air pollution
The establishment
of "park andride" car parksat the entry to the town will be
encouraged.
The canton of Genevaenjoysa Federalconcession for the use of its airport. Its
powers,especiallyas regardspoilution,arethereforevery limited.
Striaer emissionstandards
Reductionof energyconsumption
210
Case study of Geneva
Introduction
Rood trffic
On the otherhand,the new traffic plan will leadto nlore traffic on the bypass
motorwayas of 1994,and in the regionsaffectedtry thelake crossing,as of the
year2000. With this linear reductionin roadtraffic, overall emissionscalculated
on the basisof thesehypotheses shouldbe 2496to;nsof NO* per year for 1994
and 1367tons of NO, per yearfor 2000. Thesecalculationstake accountof the
gradualintroductionof the catalyser,which shouldctt the emissionfactors.
Heating
Industry
2t2
c
f
€
19
L
q)
^>\
()
,+
z
v2
rD
a asasasi3888
o6oOoOo
o6)@F(OD$C?NF
6)
d)
L)
c)
v2
a
(E.=
c)
x
z
a
0)
o
v)
c.)
c.l
o
bo
{L
.+
o\
o\
v1
ts
c)
O
o
li
0)
o
bo
k
c)
d)
d)
d0
2ooooo
€@'ort('oi
o'rrl \f
=Looooo c.l
Nto<l(''$l o
o
Z ffiffiBffiffi bo
o
c.l
k
{1
c)
(J
O
k
c)
q)
x
rc
o
bo
k
e
{)
b0
k
o
oooo('
E @|r,t('(N h
l l N
oooo() ()
6l loto$l
o0
z trammEil
Motor vehicle air pollution
Conclusions
The air quallty management plan will permit the achievementof the objectivesof
the legislationon environmental protectionandminimisehealthrisks for the
population. It will not give instantresultsandits applicationmustbe rigorously
supervisedfor yearsto come.
216
Casestudyof Geneva
REFERET{CES
1?X). GenUve(1991).
ECOTOX. Mesurede la qualitCde l'air d GenCvet
217
Motor vehicle air pollution
Servicecantonalde statistique,Genbve.Annuairesstatistiques
du cantonde
Genlve, (1990,1988,1987,1985et 1973).
218
Chapter7
219
Motor vehicleair pollution
220
Summary and conclusions
8. Somedevelopedcountrieshavemadesignificantreluctionsin vehicular
emissions.
221
Motor vehicle air pollution
222
Appendix A
In-Vehicles
Yir = (xir)
+ 0'00Cr0(6
1.033295 ttl
where:
223
Motor vehicleair pollution
Vehicular Country's
Economic trips per day per capitaGNP
Group MetropolitanArea per person-a (1988US $)-g
Low Income Bombay,India 0.82 340
Jakarta,Indonesia 0.77 440
Karachi,Pakistan 1.76 350
Lagos,Nigeria 0.30 290
Lower-Middle Abidjan, Ivory Coast 1.0s 770
Income Bangkok,Thailand t.l2 1,000
Bogota,Colombia t.r4 I,lg0
Cairo, Egypt 0.67 660
Mexico City, Mexico t.73 1,7&
SaoPaulo,Brazil r.52 2,|ffi
Upper-MiddleBuenosAires,Argentina |.37 2,520
Income Caracas,Venezuela t.25 3,250
Pusan,SouthKorea t.24 3,600
Seoul,SouthKorea 1.82 3,600
High Income Hong Kong 1.47 9,220
Munich, Germany 2.31-b 18,480
Osaka-Kobe-Kyoto, Japan 2.30-c 21,020
Paris, France 1.84-d 16,090
Sampleof Britishtowns 1.96-e 12,810
Sampleof Frenchtowns 2.14-e 16,090
S:unpleof Spanishtowns l.l2-e 7,74fr
Singapore 1.41 9,070
USA average 2.68-f 19,840
Notes:
a/ Dimitriou, 1990,p 57, exceptas indicated.
b/ OECD, 1988,pp. 97,100.
c/ OECD, 1988,pp. 145,147.
d/ OECD, 1988,p. 161.
e/ Websteret al., 1985,p.22.
f/ CharlesRiver Associates,1988,p. B-3.
g/ World Bank, 1990,pp. 178-179.
224
Appendices
225
^a qQr 4)l
>,'=Z-rQOOo AOoOaaOOOooOO oo
Efi'enss$S
- l,/ =l
FBKS=€38=FeeR
i-:i I d:(\C.l:
Se
(\ICA
l. Cl
dP -l
991
o! €6.)
:-{l
z
.=
x
6
()
I
E€ERI-.-.
o tr >r€l
in S \nh\O (ae{ci\O (\l - d Q - (\.l
- rn(\ - N - r- - oi \o6o\ {- c- (\l
Y
() E a5:l
a [;.s.:l
€ ool
(J o'l
o -l
O
r!.)
c)
(t)
L<
,9
E::t
FSol
(-) ;)
L
C)
b
gl Fs
'; r
,a
KI
N
L
<l.s.E
EIE E€,g
I 9. ?sc€E-?.A:
5iuq= Hg
Y
v)
GI
fiEsFgsSsss;fF
SIEEEE HE
={
a
o
trl
ctl -l
ol o
o r-|i| (D
vl tr !
4)
.o
qo
ol=
(\ EIE .ro
=r ' {D
4) ol H (l)E
ot:
-o
,(g 5lE
EII J
io
A()
xtr -39
: safl+S$
v k
-P
H€l
ool
$siRsg*i3
ss*3snsii!i
-i; - - - i - (l - - - - (\.l
o\l A
3U
.e
vt =
9)
g
F* $sssRssai:tsesssKHn$
g€EHIF
I lr ?x-t
C)
6. }+"
-d'.E
()
(l)
Q
G)
c)
v)
!r
\o r: op .t !^\ i p :q
&.4 fl o t i+ca \o
- cn rn €
rn o i r-
\n \o ct \o eq
in co = .! F
t/1i4 \n s! $ t a co d h \n
E F 8l
Q
EE=I
1..
() '-E
€ .- ('
FTE
-,t -Ea- B> $
N
Lr
E?
il?tqfl*flFurs:e$B
u-?qe
o.
aa
+(l)
ggsE
He g€ g,*EE
E3gi+'ffiFFs
E.s
a6
dO
=v
(J
-Hl ()
\Jt i
' ot
=t o
o
ol Ht q
o E l bo
=
ol
<J : -'1
F rqE
g
eg
ia
k
6*
,; xE
.15 r.{
!t) ao ;' F
FE
(g
=-
H?
o nH
O,
l<
c) d.6
^.()
A ;de
(u
o
c) ;9
C) tro'Fo
'i,o
V)
k }e
30'F
A gEs
z
Eg
k,.
r5?
<E
C)
E8 E
H(!O
l-r
c) 9E t€s
tsq,
p 8 E g
qQ 5
O:Y
r)
;3 .g
d ?Q
N
<! qr
r^- r
L
Dg
-d :
VH.
F-i
<n g "dFR
ooo9l
tX 69 9+"b
qA .i{t-
t/B
+G)
Gtl
E.g
<:
E€ r.F e*
d - - t=O
a^
dO
=v .EEE od.{59
db;
ct 9: t n
;E H EEEH
e e
o
^'1?.ts-
A-r lJ -Y;'C,
o.l 8VE !2 Hi*E
oU
Eg
fr aE 5di;
F.Z \\\\
c ord 4)
Appendices
Roadside
229
Motor vehicleair pollution
230
Appendices
REFERT,NCE'S
of urt an transportationdemand.
CharlesRiver Associates,Inc. Characteristics
Urban MassTransportationAdministration,U.S. Delrartmentof Transportation,
Washington,D.C. (1988).
andDevelolrment.Citiesand tansport,
Organizationfor EconomicCo-operation
OECD,Paris,France,(1988).
report, Oxford
UnitedNationsDevelopmentProgramme.Humandevelopment
Press,
University New York, New York, (1991).
and developedcountries.
Zahavi, Y . Trayel characteristicsin cities of devell,oping
World BankStaffWorkingPap'erNo. 230, Washirrgon,D.C., (1976).
231
APPEh{DIX B
Parameter Definition
Table 1. Parameters
for estimationof total nitrogenoxidesemissionsfrom road
traffic.
232
Appendices
The volumeof road traffic is calculated to the traffic plan for the
with referenrce
Genevanetwork, publishedby the office of roadtraffi,: andtransportation(OTC)
in 1988(Ofricedestransports et de la circulation,Gienbve,1988).
The traffic plan showstle averagetraffic on a workinil day for the entireroad
network. The map of emissionswasmadeto coincidewith the boundariesof the
cantons. The basicgrids squaresareof 0.25 km2;the r side is therefore500 m in
length. The volume of traffic is expressedin termsof vehicles/kmper day.
Emissionsfor eachgrid squarewerecalculatedby addingtogethertle outputs
from the volumeof traffic for the lengthof road.
Type of vehicle
233
Motor vehicle air pollution
EmissionFactor Relativeemission
Category Vo Number
g/vh (1) %
Passenger
cars 79 188597 1,5 65,5
Vehicle speed
Emissioncoefficients
234
Appendices
km/h Passenger
cars@C) Heavygoods )assenger
cars Heavygoods
vehicles(IIGV) Vehicles(HGV)
("c)
10 0.1 0.1 5.8 4.1
20 1.6 1.0 19.2 t7.7
30 t.l 1.1 16.7 17.3
40 3.9 6.5 18.7 17.7
50 6.5 r0 .8 20.7 2t.8
60 11.1 t4.2 1.8.7 2r.2
70 14.6 2t.7
80 1,9.4 24.2
90 19.6 20.4
00 14.2
10 7.9
20
30
235
Motor vehicle air pollution
in g/vehicle. km
Table 4. Total nitrogenoxidesemissioncoefficientsexpressed
(ECOTOX/OFEFP). pQ = personalcars;HGV = heavygoodsvehicles.
236
Appendices
Methodology
Emissioncoefficientsfor heating
Sensitivitytets
A significancepercentage
of real estateis the propertl'ofthe city of Geneva. Its
heatingdepartmentwasthereforeableto checkall its installationsin order to
237
Motor vehicleair pollution
238
Appendices
REFEREI.ICES
du cantonde
Servicecantonalde statistique,Genbve.Annuairessttttistiques
Gen/ve. (1991, 1990,1988, 1987,1985et 1973).
239
Motor vehicleair pollution
APPENDIX C
EHeating-
@g) corresponds to total annualnitrogenoxidesemissions[NO*]
due toleating in the 1 km2andexpressed in tonsof NO2.
The valuesof Es andEr are obtainedfrom the mapof emissionsfor 19gg. The
valuesusedto obtainthe relationshipby multiplelinearregressionare shown in
Table1.
240
Appendices
[ N O * ]= 4 4 + 0 . 2 8 . E u * 1 . 3 6 . E r (l)
Whenthe grid squareis reducedto 500 x 500 m, the :orrelationis not so good,
so the 1 km2grid squarewas preferred.
241
Motor vehicle air pollution
lNO2l = po * trr.tNOl Q)
lNol = tNo_l - [No2] with [No*] > INol > 0 and INo,.l > tNot >0(3)
Lto Pl
lNOrl= +---------.[NO*] (4)
(1 + pr) (1 + pr)
242
Appendices
Ile 323 6t t5
Wilson 170 f, 56
SainteClotilde 144 5: 50
Meyrin 7l 41
30
Foron 8l Jz 33
Anibres T9 1l t6
Jussy 29 2( 19
of ttotalnitrogenoxidesand
Table2. Relationshipbetweenannualaverages
(pglm3)
nitrogendioxide concentrations
243
Motor vehicleair pollution
NO, relm3
.O+
s
\\g
gt/
,z= E:'u"-l
o too 2oo No* rdm3
244
Appendices
REFERENCE'S
245