INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Teacher I-III

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:

Position: Position:

Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Date of Review:

Rating Period:

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

Performance Indicators
Weight Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Score
per KRA QET
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T Ave
Basic 1. Content 1. Applied 22.50% Quality Showed Showed Showed Showed No acceptable
Education Knowledge knowledge of knowledge of knowledge of knowledge of knowledge of evidence was
Services and Pedagogy content within and content and its content and its content and its content and its shown
across curriculum integration within integration within integration within integration within
teaching areas. and across subject and across subject and across subject and across subject
areas as shown in areas as shown in areas as shown in areas as shown in
MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a
rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4

Efficiency Submitted at least Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 of No acceptable ### #DIV/0!
4 lessons using lessons using lessons using the given MOV evidence was
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and shown
supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1
of the other given of the other given of the other given
MOV MOV MOV
 Timeliness

Performance Indicators
Weight Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Score
per KRA QET
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T Ave
Basic 2. Used a range of Quality Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using No acceptable
Education teaching strategies different teaching different teaching different teaching different teaching evidence was
Services that enhance strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that shown
learner promote reading, promote reading, promote reading, promote reading,
achievement in writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or
literacy and numeracy skills as numeracy skills as numeracy skills as numeracy skills as
numeracy skills. shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4

Efficiency Submitted at least Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable

4 learner-centered learner-centered learner-centered learner-centered evidence was ### #DIV/0!
lessons as lessons as lessons as lesson as evidently shown
evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in shown in any of
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and the given MOV
supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1
of the other MOV of the other MOV of the other MOV
given given given

Timeliness

Basic 3. Applied a range Quality Used different Used different Used different Used different No acceptable
Education of teaching teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies evidence was
Services strategies to that develop critical that develop critical that develop critical that develop critical shown
develop critical and and creative and creative and creative and creative
creative thinking, thinking and/or thinking and/or thinking and/or thinking and/or
as well as other other HOTS as other HOTS as other HOTS as other HOTS as
higher-order shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
thinking skills. with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4

Efficiency Submitted at least Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable ### #DIV/0!
4 lessons as lessons as lessons as as evidenced by evidence was
evidenced by MOV evidenced by evidenced by any 1 of the given shown
1 and supported by MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV
any 1 of the other supported by any 1 supported by any 1
given MOV of the other given of the other given
MOV MOV
 1 and supported by MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV
any 1 of the other supported by any 1 supported by any 1
given MOV of the other given of the other given
MOV MOV

Timeliness

Performance Indicators
Weight Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Score
per KRA QET
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T Ave
Basic 2. Learning 4. Managed 22.50% Quality Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom No acceptable
Education Environment classroom management management management management evidence was
Services and Diversity structure to strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that shown
of Learners engage learners, engage learners in engage learners in engage learners in engage learners in
individually or in activities/ tasks as activities/ tasks as activities/ tasks as activities/ tasks as
groups, in shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
meaningful with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4
exploration,
discovery and
hands-on activities Efficiency Submitted at least Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable ### #DIV/0!
within a range of 4 lessons lessons supported lessons supported supported by any evidence was
physical learning supported by MOV by MOV 1 and any by MOV 1 and any of the acceptable shown
environments. 1 and any 1 of the 1 of the other 1 of the other MOV
other acceptable acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
MOV

Timeliness

Basic 5. Managed Quality Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher No acceptable
Education learner behavior management management management management evidence was
Services constructively by strategies of strategies of strategies of strategies of shown
applying positive learner behavior learner behavior learner behavior learner behavior
and non-violent that promote that promote that promote that promote
discipline to ensure positive and non- positive and non- positive and non- positive and non-
learning-focused violent discipline violent discipline violent discipline violent discipline
environments. as shown in MOV as shown in MOV as shown in MOV as shown in MOV
submitted with a submitted with a submitted with a submitted with a
rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4
### #DIV/0!
 ### #DIV/0!

Efficiency Submitted at least Submitted at least Submitted at least Submitted any 1 of No acceptable
4 of the given 4 of the given 4 of the given the given evidence was
strategies as strategies as strategies as strategies as shown
observed in at observed in 3 observed in 2 observed in only 1
least 4 lessons lessons lessons lesson

Timeliness

Performance Indicators
Weight Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Score
per KRA QET
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T Ave
Basic 6. Used Quality Applied Applied Applied Applied No acceptable
Education differentiated, differentiated differentiated differentiated differentiated evidence shown
Services developmentally teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies
appropriate to address learner to address learner to address learner to address learner
learning diversity as shown diversity as shown diversity as shown diversity as shown
experiences to in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a
address learners’ rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4
gender, needs,
strengths, interests Efficiency Submitted at least Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 No acceptable
and experiences. 4 differentiated differentiated differentiated differentiated evidence shown
teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategy ### #DIV/0!
in at least 2 in at least 2 in 2 lessons as in only 1 lesson as
lessons as lessons as evidenced by MOV evidently shown in
evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV 1 and supported by any 1 of the
1 and supported by 1 and supported by any 1 of the other acceptable MOV
any 1 of the other any 1 of the other acceptable MOV
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV

Timeliness
Basic 3. Curriculum 7. Planned, 22.50% Quality Planned and Planned and Planned and Planned and No acceptable
Education and Planning managed and implemented implemented implemented implemented evidence was
Services implemented developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally shown
developmentally sequenced sequenced sequenced sequenced
sequenced teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and
teaching and learning process learning process learning process learning process
learning processes as shown in MOV as shown in MOV as shown in MOV as shown in MOV
to meet curriculum 1 with a rating of 7 1 with a rating of 6 1 with a rating of 5 1 with a rating of 4
requirements and
varied teaching
contexts. ### #DIV/0!
 teaching and
learning processes
to meet curriculum
requirements and
varied teaching Efficiency Submitted at least Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable
contexts. 4 developmental- developmentally developmentally developmentally evidence was ### #DIV/0!
ly sequenced sequenced sequenced sequenced shown
teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and
learning process learning process learning process learning process
as evidently shown as evidently shown as evidently shown as evidently shown
in MOV 1 and in MOV 1 and in MOV 1 and in any 1 of the
supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1 given MOV
of the other given of the other given of the other given
MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness
Performance Indicators
Weight Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Score
per KRA QET
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T Ave
Basic 8. Participated in Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely participated No acceptable
Education collegial participated in participated in participated in in LAC/FGD/ evidence was
Services discussions that LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ meeting to discuss shown
use teacher and meetings to meetings to meetings to teacher/learner
learner feedback to discuss discuss discuss feedback to enrich
enrich teaching teacher/learner teacher/learner teacher/learner instruction as
practice. feedback to enrich feedback to enrich feedback to enrich shown in the MOV
instruction as instruction as instruction as submitted
shown in the MOV shown in the MOV shown in the MOV
submitted submitted submitted ### #DIV/0!

Efficiency Participated in at Participated in 3 Participated in 2 Participated in 1 No acceptable

least 4 LACs/ LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ LAC/FGD/meeting evidence was
FGDs/meetings as meetings as meetings as as evidently shown shown
evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in in any 1 of the
any 1 of the given any 1 of the given any 1 of the given given MOV
MOV MOV MOV
Timeliness
Basic 9. Selected, Quality Developed and Developed and Developed and Developed and No acceptable
Education developed, used varied used varied used varied used varied evidence was
Services organized and teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and shown
used appropriate learning resources, learning resources, learning resources, learning resources,
teaching and including ICT, to including ICT, to including ICT, to including ICT, to
learning resources, address learning address learning address learning address learning
including ICT, to goals as shown in goals as shown in goals as shown in goals as shown in
address learning MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a
goals. rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4

Efficiency Submitted at least Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied Submitted any No acceptable ### #DIV/0!
4 varied teaching teaching and teaching and teaching and evidence was
and learning learning resources, learning resources, learning resource, shown
resources, including ICT, as including ICT, as including ICT, as
including ICT, as evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in
evidently shown in MOV 1 and MOV 1 and any of the
MOV 1 and supported by any 1 supported by any 1 acceptable MOV
supported by any 1 of the acceptable of the acceptable
of the acceptable MOV MOV
MOV

Timeliness
Performance Indicators
Weight Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Score
per KRA QET
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T Ave
Basic 4. Assessment 10. Designed, 22.50% Quality Designed, Designed, Designed, Designed, No acceptable
Education and Reporting selected, selected, selected, selected, selected, evidence was
Services organized and organized and organized and organized and organized and shown
used diagnostic, used diagnostic, used diagnostic, used diagnostic, used diagnostic,
formative and formative and formative and formative and formative and
summative summative summative summative summative
assessment assessment assessment assessment assessment
strategies strategies strategies strategies strategies
consistent with consistent with consistent with consistent with consistent with
curriculum curriculum curriculum curriculum curriculum
requirements. requirements as requirements as requirements as requirements as
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4 ### #DIV/0!
 requirements.

### #DIV/0!

Efficiency Submitted at least Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied Submitted 1 No acceptable

4 varied assessment tools assessment tools assessment tool as evidence was
assessment tools as evidently shown as evidently shown evidently shown in shown
as evidently shown in any 1 of the in any 1 of the any of the
in any 1 of the acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
acceptable MOV

Timeliness

Basic 11. Monitored and Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely monitored No acceptable
Education evaluated learner monitored and monitored and monitored and and evaluated evidence was
Services progress and evaluated learner evaluated learner evaluated learner learner progress shown
achievement using progress and progress and progress and and achievement
learner attainment achievement using achievement using achievement using using learner
data. learner attainment learner attainment learner attainment attainment data as
data as shown in data as shown in data as shown in shown in the MOV
the MOV submitted the MOV submitted the MOV submitted submitted
### #DIV/0!
Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted 1 No acceptable
combination of at combination of 3 of combination of 2 of acceptable MOV evidence was
least 4 of the the acceptable the acceptable shown
acceptable MOV MOV MOV
Timeliness Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV No acceptable
were distributed were distributed were distributed was completed in evidence was
across 4 quarters across 3 quarters across 2 quarters only 1 quarter shown

Performance Indicators
Rating
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Score
per KRA
QET
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T Ave
Basic 12. Communicated Quality Consistently Frequently showed Occasionally Rarely showed No acceptable
Education promptly and showed prompt prompt and clear showed prompt prompt and clear evidence was
Services clearly the and clear communication of and clear communication of shown
learners’ needs, communication of the learners’ communication of the learners’
progress and the learners’ needs, progress the learners’ needs, progress
achievement to needs, progress and achievement needs, progress and achievement
key stakeholders, and achievement to key and achievement to key
including to key stakeholders, to key stakeholders,
parents/guardians. stakeholders, including parents/ stakeholders, including parents/
including parents/ guardians as including parents/ guardians as
guardians as shown in the MOV guardians as shown in the MOV
shown in the MOV submitted shown in the MOV submitted
submitted submitted
### #DIV/0!

Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted any 1 of No acceptable

combination of at combination of 3 of combination of 2 the given MOV evidence was
least 4 of the the acceptable of the acceptable shown
acceptable MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV No acceptable
were distributed were distributed were distributed was completed in evidence was
across 4 quarters across 3 quarters across 2 quarters only 1 quarter shown

Performance Indicators
Weight Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Score
per KRA QET
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T Ave
Basic 5. Plus Factor 13. Performed
Education various related
Services works/activities
that contribute to
the teaching-
learning process.
10% Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely performed No acceptable
performed various performed various performed various various related evidence was
related related related work/activities that shown
work/activities that work/activities that work/activities that contribute to the
contribute to the contribute to the contribute to the teaching learning
teaching learning teaching learning teaching learning process as shown
process as shown process as shown process as shown in the MOV
in the MOV in the MOV in the MOV submitted
submitted submitted submitted ### #DIV/0!

Efficiency Submitted at least Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 of No acceptable

4 different kinds of different kinds of different kinds of the acceptable evidence was
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV MOV shown

Timeliness

RATING FOR
OVERALL
#DIV/0! ###
ACCOMPLISH-
MENTS
ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCES
RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500 – 5.000 Outstanding
3.500 – 4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500 – 3.499 Satisfactory
1.500 – 2.499 Unsatisfactory
below 1.499 Poor

Rater Ratee Approving Authority