LAMPIRAN 6

HASIL PENGOLAHAN DATA SPSS

Frequencies

Statistics

Us ia
N Valid 72
Missing 0
Mean 28,58
Median 28,00
Mode 33
Std. Deviation 5,375
Minimum 17
Maximum 41

Frequencies
Statistics

Tingkat Tingkat Status Jarak

Kel Us ia Pendidikan Pendidikan Pekerjaan Ekonomi Kehamilan Paritas Aktivitas Fis ik Anemia KEK ANC
N Valid 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72
Missing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Frequency Table

Kel

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Kontrol 48 66,7 66,7 66,7
Kasus 24 33,3 33,3 100,0
Total 72 100,0 100,0

Usia

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Tidak Beresiko 58 80,6 80,6 80,6
Beresiko 14 19,4 19,4 100,0
Total 72 100,0 100,0

Tingkat Pendidikan

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid D2 1 1,4 1,4 1,4
D3 1 1,4 1,4 2,8
S1 9 12,5 12,5 15,3
SD 2 2,8 2,8 18,1
SMA 46 63,9 63,9 81,9
SMP 13 18,1 18,1 100,0
Total 72 100,0 100,0
 Tingkat Pendidikan

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Tinggi 57 79,2 79,2 79,2
Rendah 15 20,8 20,8 100,0
Total 72 100,0 100,0

Pekerjaan

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Dokter 1 1,4 1,4 1,4
IRT 54 75,0 75,0 76,4
Karyawan 7 9,7 9,7 86,1
Pedagang 8 11,1 11,1 97,2
Wiraswas 2 2,8 2,8 100,0
Total 72 100,0 100,0

Status Ekonomi

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Tidak Miskin 44 61,1 61,1 61,1
Miskin 28 38,9 38,9 100,0
Total 72 100,0 100,0

Jarak Kehamilan

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Tidak Beresiko 63 87,5 87,5 87,5
Beresiko 9 12,5 12,5 100,0
Total 72 100,0 100,0

Paritas

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Tidak Beresiko 41 56,9 56,9 56,9
Beresiko 31 43,1 43,1 100,0
Total 72 100,0 100,0

Aktivitas Fisik

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Ringan 54 75,0 75,0 75,0
Sedang - berat 18 25,0 25,0 100,0
Total 72 100,0 100,0
 Anemia

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Tidak Anemia 42 58,3 58,3 58,3
Anemia 30 41,7 41,7 100,0
Total 72 100,0 100,0

KEK

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Tidak 51 70,8 70,8 70,8
Ya 21 29,2 29,2 100,0
Total 72 100,0 100,0

ANC

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Sesuai Standar 50 69,4 69,4 69,4
Tidak Sesuai s tandar 22 30,6 30,6 100,0
Total 72 100,0 100,0

Crosstabs

Usia * Kel

Crosstab

Kel
Kontrol Kasus Total
Us ia Tidak Beresiko Count 40 18 58
% within Kel 83,3% 75,0% 80,6%
Beresiko Count 8 6 14
% within Kel 16,7% 25,0% 19,4%
Total Count 48 24 72
% within Kel 100,0% 100,0% 100,0%

Chi-Square Tests

As ymp. Sig. Exact Sig. Exact Sig.

Value df (2-sided) (2-sided) (1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square ,709b 1 ,400
Continuity Correctiona ,277 1 ,599
Likelihood Ratio ,689 1 ,407
Fis her's Exact Test ,529 ,294
Linear-by-Linear
,700 1 ,403
As sociation
N of Valid Cases 72
a. Computed only for a 2x2 table
b. 1 cells (25,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
4,67.
 Ri sk Estim ate

95% Confidenc e
Int erval
Value Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for Usia
(Tidak Beresiko / 1,667 ,504 5,510
Beresiko)
For cohort Kel = Kontrol 1,207 ,743 1,961
For cohort Kel = Kasus ,724 ,354 1,482
N of Valid Cases 72

Tingkat Pendidikan * Kel

Crosstab

Kel
Kontrol Kasus Total
Tingkat Pendidikan Tinggi Count 41 16 57
% within Kel 85,4% 66,7% 79,2%
Rendah Count 7 8 15
% within Kel 14,6% 33,3% 20,8%
Total Count 48 24 72
% within Kel 100,0% 100,0% 100,0%

Chi-Square Tests

As ymp. Sig. Exact Sig. Exact Sig.

Value df (2-sided) (2-sided) (1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 3,411b 1 ,065
Continuity Correctiona 2,368 1 ,124
Likelihood Ratio 3,258 1 ,071
Fis her's Exact Test ,121 ,064
Linear-by-Linear
3,363 1 ,067
As sociation
N of Valid Cases 72
a. Computed only for a 2x2 table
b. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count les s than 5. The minimum expected count is
5,00.

Ri sk Estim ate

95% Confidenc e
Int erval
Value Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for Tingkat
Pendidikan (Tinggi / 2,929 ,911 9,411
Rendah)
For cohort Kel = Kontrol 1,541 ,876 2,711
For cohort Kel = Kasus ,526 ,280 ,988
N of Valid Cases 72
Aktivitas Fisik * Kel

Crosstab

Kel
Kontrol Kasus Total
Aktivitas Ringan Count 38 16 54
Fis ik % within Kel 79,2% 66,7% 75,0%
Sedang - berat Count 10 8 18
% within Kel 20,8% 33,3% 25,0%
Total Count 48 24 72
% within Kel 100,0% 100,0% 100,0%

Chi-Square Tests

As ymp. Sig. Exact Sig. Exact Sig.

Value df (2-sided) (2-sided) (1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 1,333b 1 ,248
Continuity Correctiona ,750 1 ,386
Likelihood Ratio 1,297 1 ,255
Fis her's Exact Test ,263 ,192
Linear-by-Linear
1,315 1 ,252
As sociation
N of Valid Cases 72
a. Computed only for a 2x2 table
b. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count les s than 5. The minimum expected count is
6,00.

Ri sk Estim ate

95% Confidenc e
Int erval
Value Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for Aktivitas
Fis ik (Ringan / Sedang 1,900 ,634 5,696
- berat )
For cohort Kel = Kontrol 1,267 ,809 1,983
For cohort Kel = Kasus ,667 ,345 1,290
N of Valid Cases 72

Status Ekonomi * Kel

Crosstab

Kel
Kontrol Kasus Total
Status Ekonomi Tidak Miskin Count 34 10 44
% within Kel 70,8% 41,7% 61,1%
Miskin Count 14 14 28
% within Kel 29,2% 58,3% 38,9%
Total Count 48 24 72
% within Kel 100,0% 100,0% 100,0%
 Chi-Square Tests

As ymp. Sig. Exact Sig. Exact Sig.

Value df (2-sided) (2-sided) (1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 5,727b 1 ,017
Continuity Correctiona 4,566 1 ,033
Likelihood Ratio 5,677 1 ,017
Fis her's Exact Test ,022 ,017
Linear-by-Linear
5,648 1 ,017
As sociation
N of Valid Cases 72
a. Computed only for a 2x2 table
b. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count les s than 5. The minimum expected count is
9,33.

Ri sk Estim ate

95% Confidenc e
Int erval
Value Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for Stat us
Ek onomi (Tidak Miskin 3,400 1,223 9,454
/ Misk in)
For cohort Kel = Kontrol 1,545 1,032 2,314
For cohort Kel = Kasus ,455 ,235 ,878
N of Valid Cases 72

Jarak Kehamilan * Kel

Crosstab

Kel
Kontrol Kasus Total
Jarak Kehamilan Tidak Beresiko Count 44 19 63
% within Kel 91,7% 79,2% 87,5%
Beresiko Count 4 5 9
% within Kel 8,3% 20,8% 12,5%
Total Count 48 24 72
% within Kel 100,0% 100,0% 100,0%

Chi-Square Tests

As ymp. Sig. Exact Sig. Exact Sig.

Value df (2-sided) (2-sided) (1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 2,286b 1 ,131
Continuity Correctiona 1,286 1 ,257
Likelihood Ratio 2,155 1 ,142
Fis her's Exact Test ,149 ,130
Linear-by-Linear
2,254 1 ,133
As sociation
N of Valid Cases 72
a. Computed only for a 2x2 table
b. 1 cells (25,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
3,00.
 Ri sk Estim ate

95% Confidenc e
Int erval
Value Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for Jarak
Kehamilan (Tidak 2,895 ,699 11,983
Beresiko / Beresiko)
For cohort Kel = Kontrol 1,571 ,744 3,321
For cohort Kel = Kasus ,543 ,271 1,087
N of Valid Cases 72

Paritas * Kel

Crosstab

Kel
Kontrol Kasus Total
Paritas Tidak Beresiko Count 31 10 41
% within Kel 64,6% 41,7% 56,9%
Beresiko Count 17 14 31
% within Kel 35,4% 58,3% 43,1%
Total Count 48 24 72
% within Kel 100,0% 100,0% 100,0%

Chi-Square Tests

As ymp. Sig. Exact Sig. Exact Sig.

Value df (2-sided) (2-sided) (1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 3,427b 1 ,064
Continuity Correctiona 2,556 1 ,110
Likelihood Ratio 3,420 1 ,064
Fis her's Exact Test ,080 ,055
Linear-by-Linear
3,380 1 ,066
As sociation
N of Valid Cases 72
a. Computed only for a 2x2 table
b. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count les s than 5. The minimum expected count is
10,33.

Ri sk Estim ate

95% Confidenc e
Int erval
Value Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for Paritas
(Tidak Beresiko / 2,553 ,935 6,969
Beresiko)
For cohort Kel = Kontrol 1,379 ,958 1,984
For cohort Kel = Kasus ,540 ,278 1,049
N of Valid Cases 72
Anemia * Kel

Crosstab

Kel
Kontrol Kasus Total
Anemia Tidak Anemia Count 34 8 42
% within Kel 70,8% 33,3% 58,3%
Anemia Count 14 16 30
% within Kel 29,2% 66,7% 41,7%
Total Count 48 24 72
% within Kel 100,0% 100,0% 100,0%

Chi-Square Tests

As ymp. Sig. Exact Sig. Exact Sig.

Value df (2-sided) (2-sided) (1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 9,257b 1 ,002
Continuity Correctiona 7,779 1 ,005
Likelihood Ratio 9,302 1 ,002
Fis her's Exact Test ,005 ,003
Linear-by-Linear
9,129 1 ,003
As sociation
N of Valid Cases 72
a. Computed only for a 2x2 table
b. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count les s than 5. The minimum expected count is
10,00.

Risk Estimate

95% Confidence
Interval
Value Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for Anemia
4,857 1,696 13,914
(Tidak Anemia / Anemia)
For cohort Kel = Kontrol 1,735 1,152 2,613
For cohort Kel = Kasus ,357 ,176 ,725
N of Valid Cases 72

KEK * Kel

Crosstab

Kel
Kontrol Kasus Total
KEK Tidak Count 40 11 51
% within Kel 83,3% 45,8% 70,8%
Ya Count 8 13 21
% within Kel 16,7% 54,2% 29,2%
Total Count 48 24 72
% within Kel 100,0% 100,0% 100,0%
 Chi-Square Tests

As ymp. Sig. Exact Sig. Exact Sig.

Value df (2-sided) (2-sided) (1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 10,891 b 1 ,001
Continuity Correctiona 9,151 1 ,002
Likelihood Ratio 10,566 1 ,001
Fis her's Exact Test ,002 ,001
Linear-by-Linear
10,739 1 ,001
As sociation
N of Valid Cases 72
a. Computed only for a 2x2 table
b. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count les s than 5. The minimum expected count is
7,00.

Risk Estimate

95% Confidence
Interval
Value Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for KEK
5,909 1,957 17,840
(Tidak / Ya)
For cohort Kel = Kontrol 2,059 1,171 3,618
For cohort Kel = Kas us ,348 ,187 ,649
N of Valid Cases 72

ANC * Kel

Crosstab

Kel
Kontrol Kasus Total
ANC Sesuai Standar Count 40 10 50
% within Kel 83,3% 41,7% 69,4%
Tidak Sesuai s tandar Count 8 14 22
% within Kel 16,7% 58,3% 30,6%
Total Count 48 24 72
% within Kel 100,0% 100,0% 100,0%

Chi-Square Tests

As ymp. Sig. Exact Sig. Exact Sig.

Value df (2-sided) (2-sided) (1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 13,091 b 1 ,000
Continuity Correctiona 11,201 1 ,001
Likelihood Ratio 12,777 1 ,000
Fis her's Exact Test ,001 ,000
Linear-by-Linear
12,909 1 ,000
As sociation
N of Valid Cases 72
a. Computed only for a 2x2 table
b. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count les s than 5. The minimum expected count is
7,33.
 Ri sk Estim ate

95% Confidenc e
Int erval
Value Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for ANC
(Sesuai St andar / Tidak 7,000 2,304 21,266
Sesuai standar)
For cohort Kel = Kontrol 2,200 1,244 3,890
For cohort Kel = Kasus ,314 ,166 ,595
N of Valid Cases 72